Max number of items exceeded?

I am trying to develop a questionaire like application. Most of the logic is stored inside pl/sql functions (that is retrieving the previous or next question with possible answers and answer-types, like, eg. radiogroup, select-list, textarea, ...) while all of the questions and respective possible answers are kept inside a collection. In processing the answers after submit I store given answers inside the same collection, basically by nullifying all possibly previously given answers for the current question and then looping through eg, g_f01.count to refill. The entire application remains on the same page, showing eg., in one 'frame', one or two questions with say 7 checkboxes and two textareas.
Everything seems to work fine, I can go forward and backward and will find new questions or ones that already have been answerd, but!!...
after the 50st item (answer), that is after I reached the 50st radiogroup, checkbox or textarea, new checkboxes or radiogroups even though shown the resulting values will not be stored inside the collection anymore.
generating the page i use:
htp.prn(apex_item.radiogroup(p_idx => 1, p_value => c2.a_id, p_selected_value => c2.qa_id, p_attributes => 'id="P2_QUEST_' || i || '"'));
and in processing correspondingly ...
FOR i IN 1 .. apex_application.g_f01.COUNT
LOOP
FOR c2 IN
(SELECT seq_id,
c001 q_id,
c002 a_id,
c012 qa_id
FROM apex_collections
WHERE c001 = to_char(p_q_id)
AND collection_name = 'ANSWERS'
AND c002 = apex_application.g_f01(i))
LOOP
apex_collection.update_member_attribute(p_collection_name =>
'ANSWERS', p_seq => c2.seq_id, p_attr_number => '12',
p_attr_value => c2.a_id);
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
to me I only use f01 ... f04 say, ... Is it possible that I still hit the max of 50 page-items?
Regards
j.

max number of items exceeded?

Similar Messages

  • Max Number of items for an FI document (999) has been exceded

    Dear Guru's
    I hav production Bom For A ( Truck) , and now when i declare the production it gives me an ERROR :-
    Max Number of items for an FI document (999) has been exceded.
    How i can overcome this error!!
    Please help
    Regards
    Rahul Bhardwaj

    Hi
    You cant post more than 999 line items in FI document and you need to split the document if line items crosses 999.  It looks your production BOM itself contains some errors.  Check it.  Becoz no production BOM contains such a huge materials.  Splitting the BOM into sub BOM may be another option.
    Srinivas

  • Max. number of expressions exceeded

    I have a simple SQL to select data from a single table with a
    list of 1000 elements i.e. SELECT A FROM TABLE_A WHERE B IN (1,
    2, 3, ..., 1000). It worked fine. If I added one more i.e.
    WHERE B IN (1, 2, 3, ...., 1000, 1001), then I got error 1795 -
    Max number of expressions exceeded 254. I thought this error
    applies to the number of expressions. What I have was a list of
    values in a single expression -> B IN (1, 2, ...).
    I think the error message is misleading. If there is a limit of
    1000 elements in the IN expression, the error message should say
    so unlesss Oracle somehow formats the 1000 elements into 254
    expressions behind the scene.
    Any comments.
    Thanks.
    null

    What versions are you using?
    Do you have a License?
    thanks
    mike

  • Max number of items in detail of an object of User Administration

    Hello.
    When I go into "User Administration"->"Identity Management", I search an object (for example a Group XY
    After I select it to see the details.
    I choose the "Assigned Users" tab and Search.
    I see many items but I can display only 5 items for page.
    Is there a way to customize it to display, for example 20 items for page?
    Thanks for your help.
    Mario

    In new version of portal you have this option.
    right click on table -> User Settings -> More. Select desired no. of Rows. I am using CE 7.1 SP 11 and its available in this version.

  • Problems with max number of items on a page limit?

    I have a page with 106 items which submits fine but when I add another item (a text field) a page 404 error displays when I click the submit button. I had a look at [m-2399990] which mentioned that the "items rendered per page" limit is 100. I'm not sure whether this limit is the problem or not. I would greatly appreciate any help you can give.
    Many thanks,
    Christopher

    Hi Christopher,
    i had a same problem, the solution was to break the single forum into two tab pages.
    More than 100 items in Form or Page
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    mozkavra

  • Is a subquery in a BO report limited to a max number of records???

    Here's my problem:
    I recieved an excel sheet with 700 records of customers from a client who wants me to to create a report with specific data for these customers in my Business Objects universe (BO6.5 on SQL Server).
    So I created a dataprovider with query 1, i.e. the requested data of customers. Then I created a second dataprovider, query 2, based on 'personal files', i.e. the excel sheet. In query 1 I added to the conditions that each customer should be in (sub)query 2 (CustomerId In list of the query result ('query2.CustomerId').
    the syntax I have used for this seems OK.
    However, I recieve the following error: "Too many selected values (LOV0001)". I know this error has to do with parameter MAX_INLIST_VALUES, which is limited by default to 99 and can be extended to 256 max. But I thought it refers to the max number of items in lists of values.
    When I limit the number of records in the excel sheet to 99 the result is perfect (proof that I got the syntax right!). I can upgrade the parameter to 256, and can split the excel sheet into three, but that will not be useful when next time my client sends me 10.000 customer records.
    Can I make reports in BO which use subqueries that result in more than 256 records at all? (hardly imaginable).
    What is the best way to do this?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Lucas,
    Following is the information regarding the issue you are getting and might help you to resolve the issue.
    ADAPT00519195- Too many selected values (LOV0001) - Select Query Result operand
    For XIR2 Fixed Details-Rejected as this is by design
    I have found that this is a limitation by design and when the values exceed 18000 we get this error in BO.
    There is no fix for this issue, as itu2019s by design. The product always behaved in this manner.
    Also an ER (ADAPT00754295) for this issue has already been raised.
    Unfortunately, we cannot confirm if and when this Enhancement Request will be taken on by the developers.
    A dedicated team reviews all ERs on a regular basis for technical and commercial feasibility and whether or not the functionality is consistent with our product direction. Unfortunately we cannot presently advise on a timeframe for the inclusion of any ER to our product suite.
    The product group will then review the request and determine whether or not the functionality/feature will be included in a future release.
    Currently I can only suggest that you check the release notes in the ReadMe documents of future service packs, as it will be listed there once the ER has been included
    The only workaround which I can suggest for now is:
    Workaround 1:
    Test the issue by keep the value of MAX_Inlist_values parameter to 256 on designer level.
    Workaround 2:
    The best solution is to combine 'n' queries via a UNION. You should first highlight the first 99 or so entries from the LOV list box and then combine this query with a second one that selects the remaining LOV choices.
    Using UNION between queries; which is the only possible workaround
    Please do let me know if you have any queries related to the same.
    Regards,
    Sarbhjeet Kaur

  • Error :cannot show the value of the filter.The Field may not be filterable or the number of items returned exceeds the list view threshold enforced by administrator

    Issue : In sharepoint 2013, I am experiening below error while using filter in the list view due to the number of items in this list exceeds the list view threshold, which is 10000 items. Tasks that cause excessive server load (such as those
    involving all list items) are currently prohibited.
    Error :cannot show the value of the filter.The Field may not be filterable or the number of items returned exceeds the list view threshold enforced by administrator
    Could you please suggest a way to avoid this issue apart from incrementing the list view threshold limit .
    Prashanth

    Reorganizing content, or creating more specific views. sharepoint is warning you that the content is structured in such a way that it can cause performance issues, which should be addressed in some way.
    Kind regards,
    Margriet Bruggeman
    Lois & Clark IT Services
    web site: http://www.loisandclark.eu
    blog: http://www.sharepointdragons.com

  • Real-time 8.6 Remote panel connection exceeds max number of licenses- with no connection​s

    I've been using the remote panel right along with no problems to connect to my Compact Fieldpoint.  This morning I accidently opened the connection twice on the same computer and tripped the "Remote panel connection exceeds max number of licenses" error.  Now it will not let me connect anymore from my computer.  I've tried clearing cookies, cache and history in Internet Explorer and rebooting my computer.  I've fired up the Remote Panel Connection Manager which shows no connections, and the NI License Information window does not show any connections which have been denied due to max # of clients being exceeded.  Is there a way to reset this without having to reboot my RT controller?  I'm running RT8.6 and LV 8.6 Full Dev System and understanding that it should come with 1 remote panel license. 
    Thanks
    maat
    LV2014

    The boss wanted to see an updated feature, so I was forced to deploy a new version and reboot.  Problem went away as I suspected it would. 
    I did manage to make the same mistake again this morning (launch the remote panel in 2 different MSIE windows) and after closing them both I could reconnect.  Must be a glitch or a bug?  It'd be interesting to see if anyone else has this problem.  For now...solved, but it would be nice to see a way to fix this without rebooting.
    Message Edited by maat on 10-22-2008 10:10 AM
    maat
    LV2014

  • DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 0, timeout)

    Hello,
    In our CRM system EHP1 FOR CRM 7 ABAP ,users get this screen mainly for big contracts at different stages like collision run,saving.
    Status before error started
    I have already gone through notes 1757252
    But the parameter rdisp/max_vm_priv_time and  rdisp/max_vm_priv_no doesn't exist in our system. Instead is there any other parameter which we can use in our release ?
    I could find these errors when the timeout screen occurred :
    DEV_DISP
    Wed Jul 23 15:26:08 2014
    DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
    Wed Jul 23 15:26:28 2014
    DpVmCheck: max number of priv VMs exceeded (1 > 0, timeout), reset T59/M0/U13880/V4
    Wed Jul 23 15:26:46 2014
    *** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
    ***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
    *** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
    -IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
    -IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid  13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type  DIA
    -IN-- new_stat  NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24366
    -IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
    -IN-- msg_name  -
    *** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
    ***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
    *** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
    -IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
    -IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid  13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type  DIA
    -IN-- new_stat  NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24502
    -IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
    -IN-- msg_name  -
    *** ERROR => DpRqCheck: T59 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c   8006]
    ***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c   6125]
    *** ERROR => DpRqBadHandle: BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 7037): [dpxxdisp.c 6127]
    -IN-- sender_id DISPATCHER        tid 59    wp_ca_blk   -1 wp_id -1
    -IN-- action SEND_TO_WP        uid  13880 appc_ca_blk -1      type  DIA
    -IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE         mode 0     len 0       rq_id 24691
    -IN-- req_info DP_CANCEL_PRIV
    -IN-- msg_name  -
    sm21:
    Q0  G Request (type DIA) cannot be processed
    work process trace
    please check the image
    Thanks
    Shradha

    Hello Divyanshu
    It didnt create dev_vm.trc and VM_STACK_TRACE
    And I am unable to provide dev_disp and dev_w* here due to size of the trace
    But could the error be due to any of these parameters :
    Parameters
    Current
    Changed
    rdisp/max_vm_priv_time
    2400
    SERVLET=2400, RFC=2400
    isp/max_vm_priv_no
    3
    SERVLET=3, RFC=3
    rdisp/max_priv_time
    600
    3600
    Maximum hold time for work processes in PRIV mode
    rdisp/max_debug_lazy_time
    600
    3600
    Maximum hold time for work processes in DEBUG mode
    rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no
    1000
    1058
    Buffer Size for CPI-C Communications
    rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no
    300
    1058
    Work Process Communication Blocks
    vmcj/option/ps
    960M
    1460M
    poolsize for the VMC
    vmcj/option/gc/sharedWaterMark
    90
    70
    VMC: watermark for shared garbage collector
    vmcj/max_vm_heap_MB
    64
    128
    max. vm heap
    rdisp/keepalive
    1200
    3600
    Timer for check of unused connections
    rdisp/keepalive_timeout
    60
    150
    Timeout for connection to SAPGUI
    rdisp/wppriv_max_no
    DEFAULT
    16
    Maximum number of work processes in PRIV mode

  • Max number of content items in one folder

    Hi,
    What would be the max limit content item dumped in one folder???
    Thanks

    Take a look, for instance, at this link: http://hishamgalal.blogspot.com/2012/01/increase-maximum-number-of-folders-and.html
    There is no factual limit. Only, when there are too many items in one folder, the system does not perform well. Therefore, you may adjust the maximum number of allowed items by two parameters mentioned on the linked page.

  • Error: List View Threshold. The number of items in this list exceeds the list view threshold, which is 5000 items.

    Hi, i had created a SharePoint List in cloud ( office 365) using List Template.
    List template contains 12000 items taken as template from SharePoint on Premise.
    I am getting this error message, in SharePoint Online (Office 365)
    The number of items in this list exceeds the list view threshold, which is 5000 items. Tasks that cause excessive server load (such as those involving all list items) are currently prohibited.
    How to resolve it, to get data in my SharePoint list, any help will be appreciated.

    With O365 lists over 5k items are now officially supported but they will have limited behaviour due to the threshold. There are no workarounds or options to increase the threshold either temporarily, for specific users or for the list itself as you have
    with on-prem.
    You'll need to remove enough items to get it below the threshold limit, add indexed columns to support indexed views, then re-add the items again. This article is for 2010 but the section around indexed columns and views is still accurate:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262813(v=office.14).aspx
    It may be possible to add the indexes on your on-prem list where you can increase/avoid the threshold, then re-export the list. That would rely upon the list creation script adding indexes before it uploads items but it's a logical assumption.

  • Maximum number of items in FI reached - CJ88

    Hi;
    recnetly i came accross an issue, while executing Settelement system gives me following error message:
    Message no. F5727
    The maximum number of items for an FI document ('999') has been exceeded.
    It is due to the reason that after capitalization (999) line items in the grid for an AuC had been filled up and now when we execute settlemnet any further, system issue this error.
    Now i need to enhance the limit from 999 line items.
    Your suggestins / solutions would be highly appreciable.
    Thanks in advance.

    the maximum number of distribution rules (settlement rules) is 999
    this means that you cannot settle the object anymore as there is no option to enter a new settlement rule.
    Check your settlement profile - look at distribution rules - 999 is the max possible
    this is why you are getting the error
    create another WBS - that is the only option as you need another object to settle - this will create a new AuC
    Finally settle this from the new AuC to the existing asset

  • Maximum number of items reached in FI--help required please

    Hi,
    How to avoid the situation(error)
    Po raised for some 300 line items.
    PO consists of 3-4 header conditions and all the conditions are linked to a differrent GL account all together.
    GR to be done against PO.
    System fails to post the document because of the error 'max no of items reached in FI(since counter limit for accounting document lines is 999).
    This is most likey to happen frequently in my requirement since the POs are often consisting of 200-300 line items and alsmost 2-3 conditions minimum.
    In addition to that we have thought of going for purchase account management which means that effectively 2 more additional postings in GR.
    So all in all for every line in PO there could be atleast 6-8 accounting entries getting generated at the time of MIGO or any goods movement.
    This very commonly happens in Sales issues also and in Invoicng also.
    I have raised this issue earlier also but could not got any concrete answer.
    Many suggested to go in for split GR but how far that is advicable.
    There is summerization option but I am really not getting any que out of some notes I read and some forum postings I read.
    Can anyone suggest me a simple step by step approach for achieving this and basically how it works and would be helpful for me.
    I repeat and request you all to help me in this.If someone has already done this then please share the knowledge.
    Regards,
    arjman

    Hi,
    The issue what you mentioned is really a very painful and most complex one which we are also researching.  OSS suggested a OSS note and it didn't work.  Yes, as you  said, we have that issue in MIRO for now....I am afraid, it would comeup in MIGO as well, then, I will have no sleep, for sure....suprizingly, OSS is working very slow on this issue to my surprize.  The OSS note doesn't clearly specify what to and how to summarize.  We have different issues in MIRO....one for number of tax lines exceeding 500 lines...and GR/IR lines exceeding on another end...we thought if we can't fix tax lines, at least we can work on GR/IR lines but neither one is successful....We have this issue in ECC 5 for the past 3 months...with real good expert in each functional space in the team, we couldn't fix it yet!!!
    just FYI

  • How to limit the number of items that a list control can hold?

    Hi,
    I am using a Flex3 List control for one of my projects.
    I add drag & drop functionality to it, so that i can drag & drop elements from one control to another.
    How to limit the number of items that a list control can hold / can be dropped in a list control ?
    - Sen.

    1. Listen for the dragdrop event on the control you are dragging onto.
    2. check the length of the items in the dataprovider - if it exceeds your maximum override the default drop action with e.preventDefault(); (assuming you used e for the event on the handler).
    Regards,
    Mark.

  • To fill in the material number with item category u201CBu201D for Framework Order.

    The use of framework orders (also referred to as blanket purchase orders)  enables you to procure a variety of materials or services from a vendor up to a predefined maximum value (the value limit).
    Instead of a specific delivery date, you specify a validity period for the order.
    Goods receipts or the entry and acceptance of services performed are not necessary in the case of a framework PO and limit items.
    The invoices are posted directly with reference to the purchase order, provided that the specified value limit is not exceeded. When the value limit of the PO is reached, or the validity period is exceeded, the system issues a warning message. It is possible to book the invoices, but these are blocked for payment.
    During the phase of service performance, the cumulative u201Cactual" values (for the services actually performed) are continually updated in the underlying purchase. This enables you to monitor the progress of a procurement project on an ongoing basis. By comparing the "actual" value with the total value, you can always obtain an overview of the degree to which a budget for unplanned services or materials has been exhausted (i.e. see whether predefined limits have been reached or nearly reached).
    So with the Framework Order type (FO) and item category u201CBu201D you get the error that it is not allowed to fill in the material number with item category u201CBu201D.
    Please suggest me the possible solution to fill in the material number with item category u201CBu201D for Framework Order.
    Best Regards,
    Harisha

    The Framework order type is specialy defined for lesser value procurements (ex: stationeries, cleaning services ....) which are all not worthy to create Material Master at all.
    If you are very sure to fill the Material number, then proceed with some other document type.
    In what circumstances you want to put material number in FO order?
    Karthi.

Maybe you are looking for