Drill down to Multiple Levels for Subtasks in Gantt Chart

Hello,
I need to use a Gantt Chart in one of my screens. I have constructed the required data model by using VO and corresponding view links. The issue is that I am not able to drill down to the last level in a Gantt Chart. I am able to drill down to only the second level. Any help appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Sandeep

Any response to this question? Out team has similar requirement.

Similar Messages

Drill-down to multiple columns at same time

Hello,
Is it possible to simultaneously drill down to multiple columns on the same level with one click? I have several attributes that the user will want to see together at all times, so I want to be able to drill from level1 to level2a,2b, and 2c with one click.
Thanks,
Elliot

This drilling down to all the levels may not be available with the OBIEE drill level based hierarchy feature OOTB but as an alternative you can try this at you DB level to create a hierarchy within you data using START WITH and CONNECT BY PRIOR to generate the parent->child levels hierarchy within the view instead of creating multiple hierarchical columns.
Or may be you can try to create separate columns in a table for each hierarchy level. That table could either be in the database or be a logical one in the repository. For example:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Description
1 2A 3A
1 2A 3B
1 2B 3A
1 2B 3B
etc
You then create separate reports for each level, so one report has only level1 in it for this dimension, another report has levels 1 an 2 and a third report has levels 1, 2 and 3 etc.
In each report you put an action link on the levels' cells so that if you click on them you drill up or down by displaying a new report with either less or more level columns.
Hope this helps. Pls mark if it does.
Thanks,
SVS

OBIEE 11g Report-When drilling down to lower level, totals are not matching

Hi All,
I am creating a report in Analytics 7.9.6.3 , OBIEE 11g - Let’s say Budget Cost/Actual Cost based on the Date Dimension
Have selected the Fiscal Year Dim, Fact Budget Cost, Fact Actual Cost
FY BCost ACost
2011 100 120
2012 150 140
Total 250 260
But here when I am drilling down from Year to Quarter and Period - The values are not matching with the totals....
FY FY Qrt BCost ACost
2011 2011 Q1 80 100
2011 Q2 100 90
2011 Q3 110 120
2011 Q4 90 130
Total 380 440
Fiscal Year, Fiscal Quarter Budget Cost and Actual Cost are not returning correct results – When selecting cost's by fiscal year, or filtering on a specific fiscal year, the amount returned does not equal the fiscal year total;
when I am drilling down to Quarter and Period Level the BCost & ACosts are bumping the Numbers as above and not matching with totals
Any suggestions?

Check out the query in both the times.Execute against database and try to sum the data for quarter/period and compare it with Year data.
Just try to differentiate is it a report total that is getting wrong or the data in the database table itself is getting wrong stored.
Mark as helpful if it helps.
Regards,
Veeresh Rayan

Cash Management Report FF7B - drill-down from planning levels to AP/AR OIs

Hi
I'm configuring cash management and have created all planning levels and groups needed.
All master data, ie GL accounts, vendors and customers, have the correct planning level or group.
I've created all the groupings etc that I need.
I'm running the reports FF7A and FF7B. I have two questions and problems.
1. When running the Liquidity Forecsat for customers and vendors I drill-down to the standard PL or SL planning levels for AP and AR postings respectively. Then I drill into the planning groups correctly (E1-E9 and R1-R8). But when I try to drill into the cash management detail records (or is it the AP/AR line items?) I get "Memo Records: List - List Contains No Data". This happens every time. Should I now see the AP or AP line items? Or should I see some cash management memo records? I have deleted all the cash management data several times and recreated but I still get this problem (using reports RFFDDL00 and RFFDKU00)
When I do the same for purchase orders, purchase requisitions or sales orders I see a Memo Records List which agrees with the previous planning level total and I can then drill into the actiual POs, PRs or SOs from this list without an issue.
2. When running the Cash Position and I do the drill-down to the GL Line Items, I get an enormous list which does not just show the total of items at the previous planning level. Why is this please? Example: a bank account with a balance of £2,000 (shown on the panning level) but with 000's of line items totalling say £5m. Again I have deleted the CM data and recreated but without any improvement to the problem.
Any help anyone can give me with these issues will be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
Wayne

Hi
I have the same trouble with Tcode FF7B. There´s a message "Memo Records: List - List Contains No Data"; bit in the TcodeFF7A, it runs OK. The message appears just witn Tcode FF7A.
Also, There´s all TR data in tables FDSB for GL accounts, FDSR and FDFIEP for customers/vendors.
Can you help me?? can you solved this issue?
Tanks for your Help

Reporting by org hierarchy with drill down by each level of reports to...

Hello,
I'm trying to determine how to aggregate reporting by org hierarchy. Utlimately to report on opportunities at the highest level (CEO; all opportunities below CEO) then a second drill down report that shows summary by Level 2 (all those who report to the CEO), then again by Level 3 drill down which would be those who report to somone in Level 2. In all instances I want the report to show all records that ultimately roll up to that level (thus include direct reports alll of their direct and indirect reports )
Level 1
CEO $10,000,000 200 Optys
Level 2
Sales Leader 1 $ 3,000,000
Sales Leader 2 $ 2,000,000
Sales Leader 3 $ 1,500,000
Sales Leader 4 $ 3,500,000
Level 3
<ul><li>- rollup of all that report to Sales Leader 1 (and so on) aggregated by first level of direct reports ($3,000,000)
     Sales Mgr 1.1 $ 1,000,000
     Sales Mgr 1.2 $ 500,000
     Sales Mgr 1.3 $ 750,000
     Sales Mgr 1.4 $ 250,000</li>
</ul>
I'd appreicate any help you can send my way.
Thanks, Aaron

Hi Aaron,
I have come across this and found that using the "Reports To" hierarchy and "Territory Team" hierarchy are not sufficient. I implemented this as a solution for one of our clients and it works very well:
I have modified the user entity and renamed 4 standard fields:
•     Business Unit renamed to "Primary Line of Business"
•     Business Unit Level 1 renamed to "BU Group"
•     Business Unit Level 2 renamed to "Business Unit"
•     Business Unit Level 3renamed to "Team"
Not all fields go through into analytics so I had to use these fields which are available in the Opportunity-Product History subject area. The downside is that they have to be text boxes so restrict access to who can populate these. From this you can get 4 hierarchy levels and drill from one to the next. The record owner then becomes the lowest level in your report and it can look something like this:
Level 1
Primary Line of Business
Level 2
BU Group
BU Group
Level 3
Business Unit
Business Unit
Business Unit
Level 4
Team
Team
Team
Team
Level 5
Sales Person 1
Sales Person 2
Sales Person 3
Sales Person 4
Sales Person 5
Obviously it would appear side by side in the report..
Thanks

Drill down is not working for Pivot tables,but working for chart

I have two reports and trying to navigate betwen summary report to detail report. But details report is displaying all the records .The filter condition is not working and displaying all the filters .I have Case statement in my filter.But the summary report column where the filter condition is applied is aggregated in the RPD level. Does this might be the reason ?. Is it passing different type of data type to details report ?. The filter condition is not working for Pivot table .But Chart is working fine and displaying the only selected records based on the filter condition.
Please help me with the below issue.

Hi sil174sss,
Per my understanding you are experiencing the issue with the excel report which have add the drill down action, after export to excel only the expanded nodes included and the collapsed nodes is not shown, right?
Generally, if we expand the nodes before export to excel then the excel will display the expanded details row and keep collapsed the details row which haven't expand, but we have the toggle "+","-" on the left of the Excel to help
control the expand and collapse, when you click the "+" you can expand the collapsed notes to see the details rows.
I have tested on my local environment with different version of SSRS and can always see the "+","-" as below:
On the Top left corner you can find the "1","2", this help to control the "Collapse All" and "Expand All".
If you can't see the "+","-" in the excel, the issue can be caused by the Excel version you are currently using, and also excel have limit support of this, please provide us the Excel version information and the SSRS version. You
can reference to this similar thread:
lost collapsing columns when export to excel
Please try to export other drill down report to excel and check if they work fine, if they did, the issue can be caused by the drill down action you have added in this report is not correctly, if possible, please try to redesign the report.
Article below about how to add Expand/Collapse Action to an Item for your reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd220405.aspx
If your problem still exists, please feel free to ask
Regards
Vicky Liu

Error when Drill down on top level of hierarchy node

Hi Gurus,
The following error occurs when I drill down to a "Actual Line items sub report" using the "top node" of an hierarchy based report .
But, the same drill down works fine when I drill down using the very sub level of the same hierarchy (without any further levels of hierarchies).
System error in program SAPLRRK0 and form NACHLESEN_INIT_NODE-01-
Any help or work around suggestion would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Ajay

Hi,
Thanks for the start.
But, My Hierarchy is already active.
Any other place to check for?

Drill-Down Report Printing Problem for Selection Parameters

Dear Experts,
Have tried to configure Drill-Down Report for Vendor Balances,
Am having trouble when printing this drill-down report, Printing is coming OK but it comes with ALL selection parameters, for e.g, have entered 20 vendor codes for the balance display, system first prints all selection parameters and then it prints the output of vendor balances,
User does not want selection Parameters to be printed with the Report Output. Please find below screenshot for the problem.
Input Parameter Screen
Report Output Screen
Print Preview Screen (First Page - Selection Parameters)
Your help is much appreciated, if anyone can guide me, how to switch off selection parameters from Print Output of Drill-Down Report
Thanks
Regards
P

Hello Ms. Preeti,
Thanks for your reply, Have designed the report through FKI0 (FKI*)
Have already looked these setting, but these are not helping really, PFB screenshot for settings am having in my system, if you have any idea which can avoid User Input Parameters from printing then it will be really great help
Thanks for your help
Kind Regards
P

Diplaying matrix with drill down (toggle visibility) enabled for 4 row groups

Hello,
I have a matrix in SSRS 2012 with 4 row groups representing a product hierarchy. Product Sub Group, Product, Sub Product and Account Number are the levels of the hierarchy. I have enabled drill down (toggle item visibility) on the first
3 of these levels.
This works great, but my matrix is very wide when it is first rendered. Ideally I want my matrix to expand horizontally as I expand/drill down into each grouping. So when the report is first rendered, and 3 of the groups are invisible, the
matrix will be thin. Is this possible?
Thanks,
Gabe

Hi Gabe,
Based on my test, it cannot achieved in SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS).
We can hide these column contents in matrix, however, we cannot hide the space in the report. In this situation, I recommend you use table to display these data.
Alternative, we can add a drill-down in the column group to hide the column group when it is first rendered. Please refer to the following screenshot:
If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know.
Regards,
Alisa Tang
Alisa Tang
TechNet Community Support

How can we Restrict the Drill Down upto certain levels

Hi Friends,
We have the Date Hierarchy with the following Levels,
Year-> Semester -> Qaurter -> Month -> Week -> Day
Our requirement is Wehen we run the Report, User would able to drill from From year- > Semester -> Quarter,We need to prevent drill down from Month to date.
Thanks
Laxman

One way is to create a role and restrict access through it
see
http://cwebbbi.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/denying-access-to-an-entire-level-with-dimension-security/
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

Ideas for programming a Gantt Chart.

Well I guess almost anybody know what is a Gantt Chart. It's the chart in charge for keeping track of tasks and task relationships always following an Agenda.
This is my next step so I would like to hear some stuff from you on how to program it.
I think it's just a JTable where rows are lower than normal and the header column represents the task days, so if a task day match a header column i use a JLabel as a TableCellRenderer, and a group of painted (JLabel) table cells in a row represent the task.
That's all i know about ideas of Gantt Chart programming.
Any other better suggestions and more ?
Thanks a lot !

I see why you are doing it, but the idea would seem to break down if you were to have tasks that take less than a day. Also, you might get an unweildy number of columns if someone were to plot out a multi month (year!) plan.
If you are just going to use this as a light weight planner, the convenience of using a JTable might outweigh the disadvantages.
A better, but much more complex solution might be to manage your own graphic objects. One thought I had was to use a JPanel with buttons that could be dragged around. (for a simple sample http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=57&thread=319958 )
To take this approach, you would probably want to subclass the JButton (or JPanel), and add some sort of controls to it that would allow it to be resized (to change the task duration) and to listen for double clicks which could bring up task details. (summary, startdate, end date, etc).
humble $.02

Disabling drill down on workbook level

Is there a way to disable drill up/down on a workbook level?
Currently the drill action uses the hierarchies defined in the admin edition, which apply to all workbooks.
In certain workbooks, particular the ones I use analytic functions like LAG, allowing drilldowns may result in incorrect results. How can I disable such drilling.
Thanks!

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by [email protected]:
Ernest,
This is easy to correct. All you need to do is create a calculation of the variable that has the drill on it... then drop the field from the workbook and use the cal. in its place.
Christopher<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Thanks for the tip!
null

Af:tree , have drill down to 10th level,Master child relation.

Hi ,
Am using adf 11.1.1.5
I have two read only vo . which i have created a view link to make Master - Details relation .
Now i have to show tree structure up to 10th level .
I have table were one column provided with check box where user select a record like accid and fire menu command button.
On that fire i wanna show a pop which show a parent id as Parentnode and its related child ids as child node .Again if child has sub child id, i have to show them upto 10th level.
Any suggestions ..

i knew somewhere i was messed up .
There is only viewlink between, Parent and child .NO FK ,these are not related database table (Entity Object.).
simple query's which are made from same table , but base on Parent/Root col i have show data in tree structure way.
Just like
ParentId Chilld id
100 jhon
100 max
100 adam
101 jack
103 jill
103 marven
Now it will show in table like
jhon
max
adam
jack
jill
marven
If i click max i mean check box and fire button , i have to show tree structure like below
100
jhon
max
adam
As max parentid is 100 , i have to show all the childid which have 100 as parentid.
any suggestion plz , me struck here to handel

Drill down by customer only for 1 year (only total then) in query designer

Hello experts,
I face a need I don't manage to fit with the query designer. It sounds easy, but I didn't find solution after few trials.
The target report has to look like that :
       01.2010   02.2010   03.2010   04.2010   u2026   12.2010   Total
Customer
cust 1        ratio          ratio         ratio          ratio    ratio     ratio     Total
cust 2        ratio          ratio         ratio          ratio    ratio     ratio     Total
cust 3        ratio          ratio         ratio          ratio    ratio     ratio     Total
cust 4        ratio          ratio         ratio          ratio    ratio     ratio     Total
cust 5        ratio          ratio         ratio          ratio    ratio     ratio     Total
cust 6        ratio          ratio         ratio          ratio    ratio     ratio     Total
Year 2010   total          total          total          total    total      total      total
     2009      total           total          total          total    total      total      total
     2008      total           total          total          total    total      total      total
     2007      total           total          total          total    total      total      total
The particular point disturbing me is to display detailled ratio according to customer caractéristique ONLY for the current year (2010) and ONLY TOTAL for past years.
Thanks in advance for help, points will be awarded.
Guillaume

Hi Petiaux,
All the replies have been correct & all you need to do is a combination of a few. A step-by-step approach for your report, I'll explain in detail, and please correct me if I'm wrong.
01.2010 02.2010 03.2010 04.2010 u2026 12.2010 Total
Customer
cust 1 ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio Total
cust 2 ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio Total
cust 3 ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio Total
cust 4 ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio Total
cust 5 ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio Total
cust 6 ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio ratio Total
Year 2010 total total total total total total total
So, the above is the first set of details you need to make. Follow up by using offsets for 1 variable followed up till the 12th month. Create a variable for 0CALMONTH (Cal Yr-Month) in a selection. Follow up by copying this variable 12 times, changing the offset of the input varaible to +1, +2, etc..
Now for the next set as below, there are 2 approaches.
2009 total total total total total total total
2008 total total total total total total total
2007 total total total total total total total
1. If you are using i/p variable as Cal-Month, then its best you can approach to find the differences by making a selection for the same variable in a range like New Var (EnterMonth -12 : Enter Month -23 ). Same fashion, approach to calculate (EnterMonth - 24 : EnterMonth-35) etc. But limitations are there for this approach, as you need to select ranges & with each year you need to update the query.
2. Use CELL Editor: At the top of the icon tray, you can notice a 'cell' symbol, wherein you can find the cell editor. Under the 2009, 2008, 2007 headings you can choose to create a selection with following restrictions: 0CALYEAR (Cal Year) as varaible. But the only thing here is the input variable for this query must be 2 seperate variables > One CALYEAR & another CALMONTH. So this is another approach, where user will have option to enter cal month & cal year seperately in 2 different text input boxes.
3. Perform the calculation for 2010. Copy the same for 2009,2008,2007 etc with offsets. You can try hiding the rest of the month feilds, after calculating the total for all months of the years in 2009,2008 etc using offsets. Although it sounds crazy idea, but sometimes if customers require such an output we need to do something crazy though. I hope it might work, but as stated its the last option if nothing works out.

Drill Down Report/ Multiple Prompts During runtime

Using XML publisher can I prompt the user twice during run time? For example:
1) Enter your business id
then based on the input, give user list of all depts under that business id.
2) User selects the dept id from the list which would trigger the actual report.
Can this be made possible using the delivered functionality and user interface?
Thank you

Hi
1. This can be done, check the user guide for cascading parameters.
2. This can not currently be done. Your user would select their business id, then deprt (based on business id) then hit View to run the report
Its an extra click but not an onerous one, the user is focussed up on the parameter area anyway. IF you have a burning business case please log a TAR and ask for an Enhancement Request against product 1479 and we can look into it.
Regards, Tim

Drill down to Multiple Levels for Subtasks in Gantt Chart

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for