Duty/Tax Requirements in different sales scenarios.

Hi,
Could anyone please tell me what are the statutaory requirements in terms of excise duty, LST, CST, VAT for sales/stock transfers between-
1- A factory and a factory in the same state in India
2- A factory and a factory in another state in India
3- A factory and a depot (distribution plant) in the same state in India
4-A factory and a depot (distribution plant) in another state in India
5- For exports from India.
Pl also tell about different registers and the major provisions to avail exemption of these taxes/duties.
Broadly, please also tell how to configure these in SAP
Would appreciate the help.
Jayant

Hi Dear,
1- A factory and a factory in the same state in India - JLST (VAT)
2- A factory and a factory in another state in India - JCST (CST)
3- A factory and a depot (distribution plant) in the same state in India - Only excise duty is applicable no tax here because no sales will happen its only stock transfer
4-A factory and a depot (distribution plant) in another state in India - same as above Only excise duty is applicable no tax here because no sales will happen its only stock transfer
5- For exports from India. - Excise duty is applicable after excise invoice refered ARE documents are closed excise duties will taken back
Hope it is helpful for u
Please reward if this is informative for u
Regards,
Jay

Similar Messages

Very urgent...accounting entries for (excise duty)taxes and duties on sales

Hi Friends,
I'd appreciate if anyone would help me out the entries for excise duty and cenvat utilisation during sales.
During billing document:
Customer -- dr
To sales a/c --(cr)
To CENVAT SUSPENSE AC (CR).
Now could anyone tell me what kind of account is cenvat suspense account i.e., current asset or current liability.
Like wise can anyone help me out with the entries of excise invoice creation, TR6C Challan, Entries for Fortnightly utilization etc. that is all the entries until that particular sale is completed.
It would be greatly useful if you could even specify the kind of account is (for each account possibly) i.e, if the account is an expense or current asset or current liability.
If anyone possesses a document in regards to the same plz do forward the same to my mail id:
[email protected]
regards
kim.

Hi!!! Kim,
Entries related to Excise
When Availing of Cenvat Credit (T.Code J1IEX)
(GL A/Cs against ETT GRPO)
RG23A BED A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
RG23A E.Cess A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
RG23A S&H E.Cess A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
To Cenvat Clearing A/C (BS GL Current Liabilities)
RG23C BED A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
RG23C E.Cess A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
RG23C S&H E.Cess A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
To Cenvat Clearing A/C (BS GL Current Liabilities)
When Billing Document is created, Corresponding A/C Entry -
(GL A/Cs from VKOA & Tax Codes)
Customer A/C Dr. (Recon GL BS Current Assets)
To Sales A/C (P&L GL Income)
To BED. Recovered A/C / Cenvat Suspense A/C
To E.Cess Recovered A/C / Cenvat Suspense A/C
To S&H E.Cess Recovered A/C / Cenvat Suspense A/C
When BED / E.Cess / S&H E.Cess Recovered A/Cs are used -
These are P&L A/Cs & Grouped as Income A/Cs in FS Version.
When Cenvat Suspense A/C is used -
It is BS A/C & Grouped in Current Liabilties in FS Version
When Creation of Excise Invoice - (GL A/Cs against ETT - DLFC)
E.D Paid A/C / Cenvat Suspense A/C Dr.
To BED. Payable A/C (BS GL Current Liabilities)
To E.Cess Payable A/C (BS GL Current Liabilities)
To S&H E.cess Payable A/C (BS GL Current Liabilities)
When E.D. Paid A/C (P&L GL - Expenditure)
When Cenvat Suspense A/C (BS GL - Current Liabilities)
When TR6 Challan & Deposit of Cash into PLA A/C - (JV by FB50 / F-02)
PLA on Hold A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
To Cheque Issued A/C (BS GL Current Assets)
Updation of TR6 Challan in J1IH (GL A/Cs against ETT TR6)
PLA BED Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
PLA E.Cess Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
PLA S&H E.Cess Dr. (BS GL Current Assets)
To PLA on Hold A/C (BS GL Current Assets)
When Fortnightly Utilization (T.Code J2IUN)
Utilization from RG23A Registers / RG23 C Registers (GL A/Cs against ETT UTLZ)
BED. Payable A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Liabilities)
E.Cess Payable A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Liabilities)
S&H E.cess Payable A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Liabilities)
To RG 23A BED A/C Cr. (BS GL Current Assets)
To RG23A E.Cess A/C Cr. (BS GL Current Assets)
To RG23A S&H Ecess A/C Cr. (BS GL Current Assets)
BED. Payable A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Liabilities)
E.Cess Payable A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Liabilities)
S&H E.cess Payable A/C Dr. (BS GL Current Liabilities)
To RG 23C BED A/C Cr. (BS GL Current Assets)
To RG23C E.Cess A/C Cr. (BS GL Current Assets)
To RG23C S&H Ecess A/C Cr. (BS GL Current Assets)
Hope that this information will serve your purpose.
Please give necessary marks.
Regards...
Ameya D. Mohoni...

Tax Requirement - with different base value

Hi,
We have material (Service) for which the tax calculation should be as follows:
If the quantity is 6, say the per unit value is 100 $. Then the first 4 will have tax calculation of 15 % (GST) on 100 $ and the rest of 2 will have 60 % of total value = 60 (X). And the tax value will be 15 % 0n X = 9.
So the total value will be - 100 (Basic Price) + 15 (tax for qty 4) + 9 (for qty - 2) = 124 $.
Is it possible in standard ? Also, the above is for Newzealand government , is there any specific requirement for that ?
Please Help !
Regards

Hi Chidambaram,
Can you please give me more details on how we achieve this requirement.
Any document on this would be more helpful to me. Removed by Moderator
Please help !!!
Regards
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Sep 3, 2010 7:02 PM
Please dont deviate the forum rules by asking to share any SAP related information to personal mail through this forum

I need to split 2 different sales taxes to 2 separate GL Accounts

On a customer sales order, I have a need to split two different sales taxes for a single lineitem to two different General Ledger (GL) accounts. I know that a sales tax code (2 digit) is defined on the UTXJ pricing condition and that this tax code in combination with the account key associated with the tax type is used to determine the GL account to be used. However, in all of my current business situations, all taxes (state, city, and local) get posted to the same GL account as there doesn't appear to be a way to control the tax code at an individual tax pricing condition level. Has anyone been able to do this?
Here's my example:
Order 123, lineitem 1 has a JR1 tax pricing condition. The main UTXJ pricing condition contains a CX sales tax code. It should get posted to GL account GL001.
Order 123, lineitem 2 also has a JR2 tax pricing condition. The UTXJ pricing condition (from above) contains a CX tax code. However, it should get posted to GL account GL002.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Hi Friend
Then in order 123 in the line-item 1 say the material is a finished material , so your will be doing sales cycle OR->LF->F2
Then in order 123 in the line-item 2 say the material is a Trading material , so your will be doing ME21N->MIGO->MIRO->BILLING
So even though you assign CX tax code it gets posted to G/L account GL001. But even though the lineitem 2 has CX tax code it will be posted to G/L account GL002 because you will be assigning the stock in OBYC
Regards
Srinath

Need to load import duty / taxes onto inventory

Hi SAP Gurus
Need your help in one issue related to loading import duty / taxes onto inventory.
Scenario is, Corpoprate office is procuring the doing import for J&K plant.
PO has been raised by corporate office for asset & raw material. Commercial invoice has been posted for Customs 10 %, Customs Edu.Cess- 2 %, Custom Se Edu.Cess- 1 %, IN CVD 14 %, Edu.Cess- 2 %, Sec Edu.Cess- 1 %, IT Duty - 4 %. Material has been delivered at J&K plant. GRN has been done at J&K plant and excise duty has been capture but not posted yet. Invoice verification is also not done for vendor.
Now the requirement is, if we post excise using J1IEX_P for part 2 entry, the posting will happen to CEN SEC EDU CESS CR., CVD/CENVAT CREDIT, CENVAT EDU CESS CR., CVD/CENVAT CLG., CENVAT CREDIT ON HLD accounts. But for J&K plant we want the duty values to be inventorised as we canu2019t take cenvat credit for J&K plant. Also the material has been consumed i.e. stock is also not available.
How can we post the duty values to inventory in above case?
Looking for your valuable suggestions.
Thanks & regards'
Manoj Gupta

MANOJ
you go to j1iex select A02 Change
then select the vendor invoice no then go to item detail data, item select N non cenvatable and and save and go to j1iex A04 Post.
system will post ( it reverse the part1 entries) and it will give you the staus when u post.
This for this time
and for next time you create a seperate pricing procedure for JK plant if vendors are different for JK plant other wise if vendors are common to other plants
then create separate nondeductable conditon types for CVD Ecess on cvd and secess on cvd and addl duty copying the same condition types and assigning account key (with nondedudtable ticked) in pricing procedure.
Chao
give points if helpful
chris

Manual Excise duty with fixed amount in Sales order

Dear Sir/Madam.,
This is regarding manual excise duty with fixed amount in SD Module . I
have created three conditon type ZEXP,ZECS,ZA1X for BED ,CESS and HSED for manual excise duty with fixed amount, other than the standard condition type JEXP,JECS,JA1X , because my TRADING SALE scenario needs both condition type with fixed percentage and fixed amount conditions also. After the pricing procedure updation for trading sale, I have tried to create the sale invoice with VF01 , it is ok till the VF01 for manual excise duty but when ever I tried to excise posting with J1IIN. the manual excise duty show only zero, whiile we used the standard Condition type JEXP, JECS, AND JA1X with fixed percentage 8% -2% -1% our over all steps are ok till J1IIN for excise invoice, mean BED ,CESS and HSED shown correctly.
I have done some experiment with the TAXINN tax procedure in (Logistics general > tax on good movments> india> basic settting>determination of excise duty> Maintain excise default), I have replaced the condition types JEXP, JECS and JA1X with the ZEXP, ZECS and ZA1X in the corresponding filed. then after my manual excise duty with fixed amount data was reflecting
in the J1IIN and it start to work properly with the excise duty but my fixed percentage condition type stop to working mean, it was now showing the duty at the time of excise duty posting J1IIN .
I want to use both the condition types in the same TRADING SALE scenario. May anybody help me to solve this issue.
With Regard
Vijay Kumar

Dear Mr. Siva,
Sorry for the late reply, actually I was out of touch from this issue for few days. I am sending you the detail about my configuration----
I have assigned this condition type as following ...
TAXINN     ZA1X     A/R AT1 Quantity based
TAXINN     ZECS     A/R Cess Quantity Based
TAXINN     ZEXP     A/R BED Quantity based
Condition type information
     Control data 1
Cond. class       D Taxes
Calculat.type     Q Commodity
Cond.category D Tax
Rounding rule         Commercia
StrucCond.
     Change which can be made---
Manual entries      C       Manual entry has priority
Still it is not showing the duty at the time of (J1IIN)
It may be I am missing some configuration or wrong configuration.
give me some hints...
thank you
Vijay

Incorrect PO price vs. tax requirement in Poland

Please advice how to handle situations in SAP, where the Purchase Order price is incorrect at the time of Goods Receipt.
1.     Legal tax requirement: invoice quantity and value must match
There are situations when the Buyer enters an incorrect price in the Purchase Order (for example mistyping- human error). Later the Goods Receipt is posted and then the vendoru2019s invoice is received. It contains the correct price, different than the one on the PO.
In our US locations, Accounts Payable is able to post the invoice. It is blocked for payment because it fails the automatic three-way match, but the Buyer then corrects the Purchase Order and the system unblocks the invoice.
Theoretical example:
US Process
1.     Create Purchase Order: 1 ton, 2 PLN/ton
2.     Goods Receipt: 1 ton
3.     Post Invoice: 1 ton, 3 PLN/ton
4.     Purchase Order correction to: 1 ton, 3PLN/ton
Unfortunately, in our Polish location, this process would violate government rules. The Tax Office would question that Purchase Order History would show a different Goods Receipt value than invoice value (u201CAmount in LCu201D field)
Instead, the Polish users are forced to use a much more complicated process:
1.     Create Purchase Order: 1 ton, 2 PLN/ton
2.     Goods Receipt: 1 ton
3.     Park Invoice: 1 ton, 3 PLN/ton
4.     Reverse Goods Receipt
5.     Purchase Order correction to: 1 ton, 3PLN/ton
6.     Goods Receipt: 1 ton
7.     Post Invoice: 1 ton, 3 PLN/ton
Bottom line: We would be very much interested in finding out if any Polish SAP users have a way of satisfying the requirement of having the invoice value (quantity) match the Goods Receipt value (quantity) in a situation where the Purchase Order price was incorrect at the time of Goods Receipt. We are trying to be able to post the invoice immediately and avoid reversing and later re-posting the Goods Receipt.
2.     In the same scenario, the price difference (1 PLN in the example above) is posted to u201CMat Cost PPVu201D account which is presented in P&L.
Part of PPV should be presented in Balance Sheet (material could be still on stock) while currently total amount goes directly to P&L. Is there any solution to automatically book PPV at the end of the month between 2 different accounts: one in Balance Sheet and P&L?
If any other Polish company is willing to discuss this with us directly, we can provide example and communicate in Polish.

Raghavan,
Already replication in Q environment done but the results are not same as similar to P environment. Due to this my confusion gets even more bigger.
Please let me know whether the price in layout gets appear from item detail of condition tab page (pricing procedure) or it gets determined from smarform.
Regards,
Kumar S

Which is better Different Distribution channel or different sales order typ

Hi
My requirement can be met with three config options. Kindly go through these options and suggest which one is best and why
1. Keeping one distribution channel and different sales order types.
2. Configuring different distribution channel but single sales order type.
3. Configuring different distribution channel and different sales order types.
Kindly suggest
Regards
Gaurav Jain

Hi there,
Without telling what the requirement is how can we suggest you something?
All the below options are possible in SD. Depends on the scenario to choose which is the best 1.
Regards,
Sivanand

To obtain TDID for different Sales Document

Hi all,
I must run READ_TEXT Function to obtain comments with VBBP (Position) VBBK (Header) of document I've created by VA01 transaction.
From this transaction I can create different types of document and parameter TDID of the function changes in according with ducument type I've created; so I need to obtain the correct TDID.
For example:
CLIENT                      100
ID                              ZTE4
LANGUAGE              IT
NAME                        0179000320
OBJECT                     VBBK
ZTE4 is the correct parameter for one kind of document but is not ever the same.
Someone know the way?
Thank You

Hi,
Refer to customizing tables for your requirement
For header text ids (VBBK) do the following
Get the tax determination procedure of sales document type from TVAK.(tvak-txtgr).
Get the text ids from the table TTXERN by passing
text id = VBBK and Text determination procedure = tvak-txtgr (previous step)
Use appropriate text id from the above list for READ_TEXT
For item text ids (VBBP) do the following
Get the tax determination procedure of sales document type from TVAP.(tvap-txtgr).
Pass item category as input parameter
Get the text ids from the table TTXERN by passing
text id = VBBP and Text determination procedure = tvap-txtgr (previous step)
Use appropriate text id from the above list for READ_TEXT
Regards
Vinod

Inventory sometimes coming to our place in high sea sales scenario?

Dear Experts,
Here we have mapped the high sea sales scenario through third party sales process.
here in this process since the documents are endorsed on the name of customers when the shipment is sailing only, so here we have to do only statistical GR where in client's inventory will not be updated as per standard third party scenario, but here some times goods are stored at client's plot ( which was hired at port) and the shipment for the same starts after 5 days or so.
under such situations client is asking us to show the inventory like third party stocks. To deal with this kindly suggest your suggestions so that this can be adressed by taking legal points of high sea sales agreement in mind.
Balu R.V

Hi Balakrishna,
If clients asking you tshow the stock which is only possible when if carry out GR in the respective plant in that ase only stco will show or in othe way is in STO stock will as in transist. Without doing GR how the stock will updated /Show.
But you can Map with creation of Logical plant which i uite normal in Bonded storage process as and when required pay the duty and release the material which bulk purchase and material will be stored at Cutom as and when reqyured pay the Duty and receipt the material through STO in the same way you can map.
1) You can create Port as a plant
2) For high sea material tracking ,recieve the material through MIGO -Movement type 103 (No acunting documents will generate)
3) MIRO for Customs dept
4) MIGO 105 at port plant to recieve the material at Port( accounting documents for inventory will generate )
5) MIRO for Import Vendor
6) perform STO from port to manufacturing plant. Hope this will helps you.

Brazil: Different sale order and billing document

Hi all.
We are implementing SAP in Brazil country. I notice that for Brazil there are special sale order and invoice types but I would like to know if for a normal sale (not consignment, not third party...) it is possible to use the same sale order and invoice types that we are currently using in SAP for other countries (Z types).
I made the customizing necessary and test one sale flow in Brazil and nota fiscal is correctly generated and test the same sale order in other countries but no nota fiscal was generated.
My question is: is it mandatory requested to use different sale order/invoice type for Brasil than in other countries or they can be shared?
Many thanks in advance and best regards.

Hello,
The key to your requirement can be maintenance of Excise condition type with proper access sequence and accordingly maintain condition record for them.
You create an access sequence with following access:
- Country / Plant / PlntRegion / Region / Price grp / Mat.pr.grp / Materia
- Country / Plant / PlntRegion / Region / Price grp / Mat.pr.grp
- Country / Plant / PlntRegion / Region / TaxCl1Cust / Mat.pr.grp
- Country / Plant / PlntRegion / TaxCl1Cust / Mat.pr.grp
For export maintain condition record based on any key combination, say for
Country / Plant / PlntRegion / TaxCl1Cust / Mat.pr.grp - Tax % - Tax Code
FR / 1000 / KR / 03 (EXPORT) / 04 / 0% / V1
I hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Re: Sales scenario (monthly deduction)

Dear all,
Need your guidance on executing this process as below:
1. Company will purchase the goods required by the worker.
2. Worker will purchase the goods from the company (this is treated as normal sales scenario - not intercompany sales)
3. Delivery is carried out. (automatically - can be triggered via cash sales scenario)
4. Billing run is executed.
The issue:
1. The item sold by the Company to the staff may cost USD1,000 for example. Though billing is done, monthly deduction from the staff's salary per month basis is required instead of carrying out a cash sales (full payment upfront).
Hence, the deduction per month may look something like this:
Jan: USD 100
Feb: USD 100
Mar: USD 100
Apr: USD 100
(and so forth until full payment is done.. in Oct)
2. I figured that we can execute this using Billing Plan, with the amount or percentage laid out in the Schedule Line and each month, the Billing block is released and Billing is done. Staff that purchase from the company will each have a customer master.
Please advise if this is possible? Or is there any other alternative for this scenario?
Thanks.
Regards.

Hi,
I have checked, yes the note partially meet the requirement I was looking for.
I have configured the Billing Plan, but however, for an item, the total price is not separated over the entire validity period.
For example:
Material A = USD1,000
Valid From: Today's date
Valid To: 31.12.2010
I have the below problem:
1. The Billing Plan generated 5 billing plan item(s) priced at USD1,000 each, hence I have a Net Value of USD 5,000 as a result.
2. And for each billing plan line, the billing date is next two months.
3. Eventhough a Billing block has been automatically set for each billing plan. I am able to execute Billing (Order-related) and there is a Billing Split (which is mainly due to the different Billing Date set for each of the billing plan item). And, I have only released one billing plan, but I still see all 5 billing plan lines appearing during Billing. Shouldn't only one line appear since only one line has the Billing block removed?
Please assist.
Thanks.

Clarification required on the Sales area data information.

Hi Master's,
As per the standard taxation practice,Tax determination depends upon the Tax liability of a Shipt to Party.
But in a Customer master The Tax classification is maintained in the SALES AREA DATA-BILLING TAB,To my understanding
the Billing Tab data comes from Sold to party.If so how does Billing tab convey the Tax liability of Ship to party.
I am Confused,please let me know in terms of Customer master and Partner types:
1) Which Tabs under the sales data i.e Shipping Billing...come from which Partner.i.e like Sold to party.
(Clarification required on the Sales area data information coming from which Partner functions).
Please suggest,
Thanks
Gajender

Hi
As per the standard taxation practice,Tax determination depends upon the Tax liability of a Shipt to Party.
But in a Customer master The Tax classification is maintained in the SALES AREA DATA-BILLING TAB,To my understanding
the Billing Tab data comes from Sold to party.If so how does Billing tab convey the Tax liability of Ship to party.
I am Confused,please let me know in terms of Customer master and Partner types:
1) Which Tabs under the sales data i.e Shipping Billing...come from which Partner.i.e like Sold to party.
(Clarification required on the Sales area data information coming from which Partner functions).
There is no need of any confusion here
All the tabs and data or fields pertains sold to party only
If for a sold to party say 1001 if he himself is going to be SH and PY and BP then there is no confusion
If for a sold to party say 1001 the ship to party is 1002 and PY is 1003 and bill to party is himself that is 1001
This is what mentioned or assigned in the partner functions of CMR of 1001 in the sales area data
This means there are another CMR lies in the name of 1002 and 1003
Whenever an order comes for 1001 as Sold to party for tax classifications the ship to paty 1002's master record is accessed by the system
System accesses another record for a particular detail (tax details)
Similarly for this customer 1001's order for payment terms 1003's CMR is accessed by the system
System accesses another record for a particular detail ( for terms of payment)
There is no need for any confusion and if you run this in the system with different data you will understand it much better
Regards
Raja

Excise Duty tax status

Hi
I can't Modify the field EXCISE Duty tax status in material with transaction MM02
There is a p

Dear,
The excise data related to a particular material is displayed in a separate group box on the Foreign Trade: Import Data tabs. This is maintained at plant Organizational Level means we can maintain different data for different plant to meet the client requirement. If the information is valid for all plants, however, leave the Plant field blank.
In conjunction with other data, the data related to Indian Excise Duty is used to calculate excise duty on various transactions. This data is maintained by following the following path:
SAP Easy Access screen, choose Indirect Taxes > Master Data > Excise Rate
or,
You can use transaction code J1ID for excise maintenance. Where you can maintain The Chapter ID data, combination of Material with Chapter IDs and vendor excise details.
Hope so this will solve your problem
Thanks & regards
Varun Bisaria

Creating Sales Order with reference to Quotation from different Sales Area

Hi,
I would like to inform you that our customer (GE ENERGY OC) from Europe have a requirement where they want to create sales orders with reference to quotation that is from different sales area. Standard SAP functionality doesn't allow this feature, hence requesting your help to give me an update in this regard.
Please treat this as urgent as they have to do business cutover where they are in the process of completing open sales orders.
Thanks
Ashfaq
Mobile: +91-98857-07558
E-Mail: [email protected]

Hi RadhaKrishna,
In standard system it is not possible to create sales order from a quotation whose sales are is different.
However I think this is possible by using some user exit in sales order. I have never tried this.
Regards
srini

Duty/Tax Requirements in different sales scenarios.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for