EBP SUS scenario ---sending a PO output from EBP to SUS

Hi All,
We are working on EBP SUS scenario with SRM 5.0 and ECC6.0 as the backend.
We are creating a PO in the EBP which is to be sent to SUS for creating a POR in SUS from vendor.
1) How do we configure the PO output from EBP to SUS system?
We could see one method call in Set output actions and output format for sending XML purchase orders. How do we configure this to send it to SUS.
2) Is it possible to have EBP and SUS in one client where from we will create a PO and send it to SUS?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

hi,
there is one customizing setting available --> you need to set this in your SRM system
transaction --> spro ---> supplier relationship Management --> SRM Server --> cross application basic settings -->
Set output actions and output format --->Condition dependent document output
in this setting select --> purchase order ---> you can see four actions --->
for the last action --->Method call ---> Time of processing ---> should be -->Processing when saving document.
2) it is possible to have SUS and EBP in same client.
You can refer to few notes available on service market place.
---> it is not to be used for productive use --> only for demo purpose.
one thing i remember is --> the system type in the scenario is EBP_SUS ( One client EBP and SUS )
Edited by: khan voyalpad usman on Feb 19, 2008 12:59 AM

Similar Messages

  • Using fnd_request to send email of output from concurrent program

    Hello,
    In R12 how can I use one of the FND api's to send output from an FND_REQUEST to an email? Would I use FND_DELIVERY?
    I cann't seem to find documentation on this.
    I did find this:
    l_ret := fnd_request.add_delivery_option
    (type => FND_DELIVERY.TYPE_EMAIL
    ,p_argument1 => 'Quick Invoice to Workbench Transfer Details' -- Subject
    ,p_argument2 => '[email protected]' -- From
    ,p_argument3 => l_email_add -- To
    ,p_argument4 => '[email protected]'); -- CC
    But not sure how to use the above or if this would work.

    In R12 how can I use one of the FND api's to send output from an FND_REQUEST to an email? Would I use FND_DELIVERY?
    I cann't seem to find documentation on this.
    I did find this:
    l_ret := fnd_request.add_delivery_option
    (type => FND_DELIVERY.TYPE_EMAIL
    ,p_argument1 => 'Quick Invoice to Workbench Transfer Details' -- Subject
    ,p_argument2 => '[email protected]' -- From
    ,p_argument3 => l_email_add -- To
    ,p_argument4 => '[email protected]'); -- CC
    But not sure how to use the above or if this would work.Please see these links.
    https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=FND_REQUEST+AND+Email&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
    https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Concurrent+AND+Email&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • How to send a binary output from ni daq 6009

    I am trying to get a binary output from ni daq 6009 to make the selections of a multiplexer.
    I am trying to make the selection directly from the labview program.
    Please help me in getting this binary output from ni daq 6009 to do the selection

    Try something like this. 
    I'm not a fan of daq-assistant express vi's... use the primitives.  Create the task outside the main structure, pass that task inside the loop and do a write where needed.  Close the task after the main loop.  This improves speed and labview performance.
    Attachments:
    ocelot.png ‏43 KB
    ocelot.vi ‏21 KB

  • MM-SUS scenario mapping of the Goodsreceipt for inbound delivery @SUS

    Hi SRM gurus,
      We are working on the MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0 and ECC6.0 as the backend.
    We are creating a goods receipt in the backend with respect to the inbounddelivery created from the ASN made at the SUS end.
    But this goods receipt is not updated as the goods receipt in the SUS for that vendor.
    Can anybody tell me how it is configured for the backend?
    I could see a business object BUS2233 for the SUS confirmation transaction type as SUCF with the int.number range as 01 and the ext. number range as 02.
    I am not sure where it is configured in MM. I could find one MM--> IM --> Define Number Assignment for Goods Receipt/Issue slips  --> Number range grpg.code where there is an NO. rng.grpg.code and the Intern.number range as 01.
    Is this the place we have the external number range as 01 which is maintained as internal in SUS BUS2233.
    Any help in this regard.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Sridhar.
    Edited by: P.T. Sridharbabu on Jan 31, 2008 4:57 AM

    Hi All,
    The report is running fine and could be able to generate the Idoc and sending it to the XI systems also. But our XI system is not able to post the same to the SUS system and is giving the following error :
    The reference to a source object via the object number is different than the reference via the GUID Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_API; Include: LBBP_BD_APIF39; Line: 175
    Any thoughts on this.
    Shall I have to configure something in the SUS system for this report to capture there?
    Or
    Shall I have to configure something in the MM system ECC6.0 for this report to send it to XI correctly?
    Thanks in advance.
    Will be of most useful to us, if somebody throws some light on this.
    Best regards,
    Sridhar.

  • Best scenario sending/receiving data to/from remote office

    We must implement some interfaces, sending and receiving from/to a great number of local office (more than two hundred) located arround our country.
    Moreover this local office may be off-line all night long and also at times, so we must control it sending them information.
    So... what's the best scenario in the case of SAP --> local office?
    and what's the best scenario in the case local office --> SAP?
    It's very important to guarantee control of exception and avoid lost of information.
    Thanks, in advance.

    hi
    if you want to transfer data from local offices to SAP and vice versa u need to use SAp XI in between and schedule the interfaces.
    if u tell me you requirement in deatil i can help you out
    regards
    Sheetal

  • Restricting P.O output from ECC to  Sus component of SRM

    Hi,
    I do have a requirement of Restricting the output of P.O document created in ECC to SRM-Sus. When a P.O is created and saved in ecc system it mustnot be shared with
    SUS provided it has no indirect materials . I do have the logic with me . I created on routine in VOFM and customized it in "Define Message Schema for Purchase Order" in SPRO and the sy-subrc is set ne 0 if the condition fails . Then also the P.O is being shared with SRM-SUS . Are there any method for accomplishing this? Thanks in Advance,
    Pradeep.

    Hi ,
    Initially when I repliacted P of HR Org Struture it sucessfully craeted BP in SRM  and was CP in Org Structure.
    But suddenly , what happned don;t know, when I replicating Employees (P) in SRM , it is assigning  to respective Postion (S), but BP is not creating in SRM  and in the USERS_GEN  for this User, its postion and ORg Unit to whom it assigned is giving  below error
    Determination of connections to object 'BP' of 'CP' '00000015' failed
    Message no. BBP_UM_UI036
    I checked all this as per Note 550055, 934372..etc....checked respetcive setting in table T77S0...I checked address alos....but no any clue......IDoC in SRM posting sucessfully....
    Can anyone please suggest what should be the cause and solution of it ?
    Thanks
    NAP

  • R/3(MM) -XI- SUS Scenario Error

    Hello,
    I'm working on SRM Integration: R/3(MM) to SUS Scenario
    Whenever i post a PO message to SUS from R/3 (MM module), I see the following error in SXMB_MONI:
    ERROR:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?><!-- Call Inbound Proxy --> <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand=""><SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category><SAP:Code area="ABAP">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code><SAP:P1/><SAP:P2/><SAP:P3/><SAP:P4/><SAP:AdditionalText/><SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">StandardMessageFault</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage><SAP:Stack>The application triggered an exception
    </SAP:Stack><SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry></SAP:Error>
    TRACE:
    "An error occured within an XI interface: SLD system SNT_BS is not known Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1F1Y; Line:92 "
    Can anyone help me resolve this problem ?
    Thanks,
    Regards,
    Sridhar

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply Vishnu. No i didn't create those OSS messages
    I just now found the reason and resolved the problem.
    Let me describe the reason for the problem:
    In the SRM box, values for the "System Landscape Directory Names" (Business System Names) in the "Definition of backend systems in B2B" were not entered.
    Txn : SPRO
    SAP Reference IMG> Supplier Relationship Manager>Supplier Self Services>Technical Settings>Define Backend Systems.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • Item level attachments in confirmation sent from SUS in EBP-SUS scenario

    Dear colleagues,
    I am in SRM 5.0
    In an EBP-SUS scenario, I have created a Confirmation for a Purchase Order with an attachment added at header level of confirmation as well as item level of confirmation and sent to EBP.
    The XML that reaches EBP has both the attachments but effectively the confirmation that gets created in EBP has attachment only in header level and the item level attachment is missing.
    Could any of you with your experience let me know whether it is a limitation or is it possible to send attachments in item level to EBP?
    Many thanks.
    Best regards,
    Srivatsa Ganesh V
    SAP Labs

    vatsa,
    if the xml message has both the attachments , then it is a problem.
    please debug the inbound of xml , it is very easy to find out whether both the attachments are considered in the creation of the document.
    use transaction sxi_support and the inbound xml for debugging.

  • Possible version conflict, sending purchase order to SUS in MM-SUS scenario

    We are currently trying to get the MM-SUS scenario working. In this
    scenario, we create a purchase order in the ERP/MM system. The
    purchase order is then transferred into SUS via XI/PI.
    After creating a purchase order in the MM system, the purchase order
    reaches the SUS system, but then errors-out in the SUS system upon
    posting. The specific error is paraphrased as follows:
    No interface action for sender or receiver found (from Trace)
    PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA
    CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT
    System expected the element http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal20/Global;
    PurchaseOrderRequest
    We suspect a version conflict. The SUS version is 7.01. The XI/PI
    system is version 7.11.
    Can you confirm or rule-out a version conflict?
    The Integration Builder scenario we are using is Plan
    Driven Procurement with Supplier Enablement.
    We have tryed many variations in Integration Builder, but all
    produce errors in SUS.  The test tool in Integration Builder also shows errors
    for certain message types.  The message type ORDERS.ORDERS02
    needed to be added manually, and did not come along with the scenario.
    Edited by: Bill Guderian on Mar 19, 2010 4:53 PM

    Any clue from here.
    Note 936003 - ERS Invoice causes conversion error within SRM
    When the SRM system attempts to process an ERS Invoice sent from the MM backend, a PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR fault is thrown.
    Other terms
    CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA SUS SRM EBP ERS Invoice XI Exchange Infrastructure Mapping
    Reason and Prerequisites
    This error will occur when the IDOC does not have a VPREI value; it is the result of an error within the divide logic of the XI mapping operation.  This operation is performed within the XI system.  A calculation of NETWR/MENGE is performed; however, the result is not properly formatted.  As such, 72.30/10 produces a result of 7.2300002. This value is too long for the inbound SRM proxy and hence the error is thrown.
    Solution
    The solution to this problem is to add a FORMATNUM function within the XI mapping operation.  This restricts the result to 2 decimal places, which adheres to the definition of the inbound proxy.
    Step by step directions on how one implements the FORMATNUM function are as follows:
    1. Log into the XI system with SAPGUI
    2. Start the Integration Builder:Design tool (for steps on how to do this, review the steps below):
        a. Run transaction sxmb_ifr
        b. This will cause a browser to come up.  Select the Integration Repository link
    3. In the left pane, select the Objects tab
    4. Navigate to the SAP SRM SERVER ' SAP SRM SERVER 5.0 ' http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global --> Mapping Objects --> Message Mappings folder
    5. Double-click on MM2SUSInvoice
    6. The right pane will display the mapping object
    7. Select Edit mode
    8. In the box that contains the output (Message Type: InvoiceRequest), navigate to InvoiceRequest ' Invoice ' Item ' Price ' NetUnitPrice
    9. Double-click on the Amount element and you should see the mapping, represented graphically in the bottom pane
    10. In the status line of the graphical editor, select Arithmetic from the list box:
    11. To the right of the listbox, scroll until you see the FormatNum function
    12. Click on FormatNum, which will cause the function to be added to the graphical editor.  You may drag the box as desired
    13. Select the connection that binds the if/then/else to the Amount box by grabbing the arrow within the input of the Amount
    14. Release the drag of the connection while over the input to the FormatNum box.  This will reassign the output of the if/then/else to the input of FormatNum
    15. Create a connection between the output of the FormatNum box and the input of the Amount box.  You accomplish this by clicking within the output and releasing within the input (respectively).
    16. Save the modified mapping object
    17. Activate the changes
        a. In the left pane, select the Change Lists tab
        b. Navigate to the Standard Change List entry
        c. Right-click the Standard Change List entry and select Activate
        d. Select only MM2SUSInvoice if more than one item is available, and press the Activate button
    18. This will complete the required modification.

  • BU_RELNR error while transferring a vendor from EBP to SUS

    Hi experts,
    We have EBP on one client and SUS on abother client on the same server.  SRM 5.0 and (srm server 5.5) and XI 7.0 (PI).  We could succesfully import the scenario of service procurement with supplier enablement and we are going with Extended classic scenario.
    All the XI settings are done properly and we could send the vendors from EBP to XI.  there is a problem in the inbound XML messages when it is creating a BP in SUS.  The no. ranges are maintained properly in SUS and the No. range Grouping done si fine.
    01)  We have an error in the SUS in the SXI monitor telling that:
    We found the BU_RELNR in the table NRIV is set as external and there is no table maint. for this.  We cannot uncheck external indicator.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <nr1:StandardMessageFault xmlns:nr1="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">
    - <standard>
      <faultText>An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredA:R1:735 -Number range interval 01 for number range object BU_RELNR incorrectly maintain. E:BBP_BUPA:060 -Error while trying to create contact person. Inform system administration Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57</faultText>
      </standard>
      </nr1:StandardMessageFault
    02)  We are not using the bidding functionality in EBP as we are going with e-sourcing.  Hence, we will have to replicate vendors from R/3 to EBP. We set the standard communication as XML/XI and make as a portal vendor in EBP in manage business partners in the web transaction. Do we need to create contact persons in EBP and then transfer to SUS?  Will it send an automatic mail regarding the login details to the user?
    03)  Or do we need to create contact persons in SUS.  Will it send an e-mail to the vendors from SUS?
    Thanks in advance,
    DV

    Alex,
    The issue to which you have replied is to do with the namespace in XI mappings.  The standard content seems to have a bug when it got imported into the configuration.
    Coming to the e-sourcing, SAP is giving phase wise integration with ECC and SRM.  The roadmap is already SAP has delivered the xi content for E-sourcing to ECC for the master data like Material masters and vendor masters.  In general, E-sourcing is a hosted application till now.  But, there is an exception for us to have it hosted by ourselves.  There are few integration issues in this.  But, it is working fine now.  Only thing is you need to send the company codes, p orgs, p groups etc... 17 objects I guess before transferring the material master and vendor master from ECC to E-sourcing.
    Then, e-sourcing to ECC integration for contracts push, SAP is moving towards ramp-up.  This will take some time to have the GA.
    Finally, e-sourcing to SRM integration, it will happen (?????????? lot of question marks) in SRM 7.0.  Right now, we are planning to have a customer interface from e-sourcing to SRM.
    Hope these answers your question.
    Regards,
    DV

  • SUS Invoicing in EBP-SUS Scenario

    Hello SRM Gurus,
                                  Due to various business process we will be deploying ECS SRM with EBP-SUS scenario.  We have strong requirement to provide PO invoice and non PO invoices ( eg utilities) via SUS.  I know EBP-SUS scenario is limited to POR, I would apprecite if anyone has implemented invoicing in SUS as people tell me it is technically possible.  If so, please share information.
    -thanks!
    Shilpa

    Hi
    <b><u>Please go through this which might give you some useful details -></u></b>
    In the original business package for SRM 5.0, the two iViews , "Invoice Monitor" and "Setting for Invoice Monitor" , are not included in the content. But for some business cases, these two iView are required.
    To add these two new iViews change the business package content manually as described below in the  Release-Independent SAP OSS Note 928764:
    Note 928764 - BP SRM 5.0: Add two new iViews to standard business package
    Note 543544 SUS: Extended Classic Scenario for EBP not supported
    Note 662077 - No values return for Order/Contract Simulation on Invc Pymnt
    Note 1096691 EBP invoice from SUS in ECS gets 'To Be Corrected Manually'
    Note 1064557 SRM 6.0 SP02: Additional Notes to be applied on SRM Server
    Note 700350 Supplier Enablement: Deployment Scenarios integrating SUS
    Note 1024334 Error when sending invoices to EBP
    Note 947198 IMS monitor: Web Dynpro with hierarchies
    Note 836943 BP SRM 50 Additional Installation Information
    Note 733255 BP Supplier Coll. 60.1: installation information
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Schedule lines tranfer from R/3 to SUS in a MM-SUS scenario

    Hi SRM gurus,
    We are working on the MM-SUS scenario where the scheduling agreement is created in the backend R/3 system. Delivery schedule lines are generated in the backend and transfered to the SUS thru. ME9E transaction for sending the delivery schedule to the SUS.
    We have a confirmation control key which guides us in SUS to create an ASN in the backend.
    Though there is a confirmation control key exist in the SA for that particular line item, when the ASN is sent from SUS to XI to R/3. There is an idoc error in the R/3 which says that there is no confirmation control key though it is there for the line item which is transfered to SUS.
    Now Pls. answer my questions :
    1) Will ME9E transfer the total lines in the SA or the schedule lines with the delivery schedules only ?
    2) Is it possible to resend the same schedule line ( with the updated delivery schedule) to the SUS as per the standard scenario?
    3) In the SUS how do we findout the materials corresponding to that particular delivery schedule line. Because in SUS the reference is only the scheduling agreement number as we could not see any scheduline line item.
    Pls. suggest.
    We are working on SRM(SUS) 5.0 with ECC6.0 as the backend.
    Best regards,
    Sridhar.

    i have seen the code --> where the FM is called for creation of SAR in SRM.
    that is FM
    BBP_SAPXML1_SUSPO_CREATE_IN --> in this --> search for this
    Call API
          IF ls_header-description EQ 'DELINS'.
            CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_API_SUSPO_CRT'
            EXPORTING
              is_header   = ls_header
              it_item     = lt_item
              it_attach   = lt_attach
              it_partner  = lt_partner
              it_longtext = lt_longtext
              it_tax      = lt_tax
              it_limit    = lt_limit
              it_sdln     = lt_sdln
            IMPORTING
              es_header   = ls_header_e
    this one creates ---> the SAR in SRM.
    and also i have seen further --> there is no place where any BADI is also called.
    i am afraid it is not possible to control what you want using BADI.
    only --> difference between --> New document and the old document is
    the Indicator --> C for create
    U for update.
    And Also if you can see the XML message for the updated document --> you can see all the lines in the XML message.
    Not the added lines...

  • MM-SUS Scenario---Error while posting the PO in SUS System from R/3 system.

    Hi All,
    An error occurred within an XI interface: Exception occurred:BBP_PD:004 -Partner 0000003000 not found E:BBP_PD:147 -Enter a country for partner 0000003000 with type 'Sold-to Party' Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57
    The above is problem occurred in SUS system. I have checked the message SXMb_MONI Tcode for XML message.
    Can any one suggest what could be the problem and the solution for the same.
    we are working on MM-SUS scenario (Plan Driven Procurement).
    Thanks
    Jagan

    Hi
    <b>Please go through the links below -></b>
    purchase order doesn't create in srm sus
    purchase order not create in sus
    Enter a country for partner with type 'Sold-to Party'
    BBP_BUPA_SUPPLIER:101
    Unable to determine logical system of sender
    Help MM-SUS!
    SUS-MM:PO not transferred to SUS--message:'sold to party'
    Error in SUS PO creation
    Re: PO error in SUS-MM Scenario
    Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Goods receipt data from R/3 to SUS ( MM-SUS Scenario)

    Hi !
    In the MM-SUS scenario, we create an ASN in SUS and the system automatically creates an inbound delivery in the backend MM system.Now after we post a GR with reference to the Inbound delivery - can we send the GR data back to the SUS system. If yes - how do we do it ?
    If the answer id no - I would like to understand the use of  links available for Goods receipt on the SUS home page.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Manoj

    Hi
    <b>Please go through the list of SAP Consulting OSS Notes, which will definitely answer your queries -></b>
    Note 868192 - Consulting solution: SUS-MM (SUS-MMSRV) service procurement
    Note 1028264 - Consulting solution: Additional function for SRM-SUS
    Note 982871 - Consulting services: supplier integration in SRM
    Note 1026638 - GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47-
    Related Notes
    Note 1064557 - SRM 6.0 SP02: Additional Notes to be applied on SRM Server
    Note 995352 - SRM 6.0 SP Stack 01 (03/2007): Release Information Note
    Please implement the following notes as applicable, if you use GR Notifications functionality in MM-SUS scenario:
    Note 1028920: RPDODELVRY does not work when both PO and SAR are selected
    Note 1026638: GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47-
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario

    Hi !
    We are planning to implement EBP-SUS and MM-SUS in one Client . Request you to help us on the following issues.
    1. While the outbound messages will not have a problem from MM & EBP, how do we route inbound messages to MM & EBP effectively. Should be handle it in XI ?? If ues, what is the best criteria .
    2. Since both the config guides for MM-SUS and EBP-SUS scenarios include transactions for transferring Vendor & Comapny Code data, how do we check duplication.For ex : if we transfer a Vendor from R/3 and subsequently try to transfer the same vendor from EBP , is there any inbuilt duplicate check ?
    3. In MM-SUS, an ASN created in SUS creates an inbound delivery is created in MM. What would happen in case of EBP-SUS i.e when an ASN is created for an EBP PO ? We are on extended classic scenario ?
    4.If you do a confirmation in EBP-SUS, will a GR be generated in both EBP and subsequently in MM.
    Request yr help pl.
    Regards

    Hi
    Welcome to world of SRM.
    I guess, you must have got enough details in the SRM guides.
    Anyways, better to understand the basics first,, before going in detail. I hope this will answer all your queries.
    <b>Refer to these links -></b>
    <u>Supplier Enablement</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cd/0e343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>SUS-EBP Scenario</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/06/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>SUS-MM Scenario</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/39/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>Supplier Self-services</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/25/99b13c48740d55e10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>Procurement</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/8e/e5623c046a9b67e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm</b>
    <u>Users in SRM user Management</u>
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cd/6313513813554e941a02a91540c29e/frameset.htm</b>
    <b>Please try this SAP OSS notes as well to get System architecture details-></b>
    <u>Note 982871 - Consulting services: supplier integration in SRM
    963000 - Usage and release of SRM as AddOn to ECC in ERP2005
    868192 - Consulting solution: SUS-MM (SUS-MMSRV) service procurement
    573383 - EBP and SUS deployment variants</u>
    <b>Also do read this -></b>
    <u>Check whether the roles delivered by SAP meet your requirements. If not, you can create new roles and assign transactions to them. We recommend that you copy standard roles and tailor them to your requirements.
    All users assigned to a respective role are then allowed to carry out the transactions. If required, you can refine the authorization check on the tab page Authorizations.
    Standard SAP Single-roles
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER (for purchasing administrators - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER (for bidders - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER (for dispatchers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER (for invoicers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR (for order processors - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER (for managers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT (for service agents - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    If you want to use SAP Supplier Self-Services, proceed as follows:
    1. Select one of the following single roles:
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_VENDOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER
    SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER
    SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER
    SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER
    SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_PRODUCT_MANAGER
    SAP_EC_SUS_SAR_PROCESSOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_MANAGER
    2. Choose Change Roles.
    3. Choose the Personalization tab page.
    Note: The personalization applies to all roles, meaning the user can also create his own roles, for example copying the delivered SAP SUS roles. He can tailor these roles to his requirements by changing the SUS-specific attributes (BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES).
    1. Select the entry BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES (SUS-specific role attributes).
    2. Choose Change values.
    A dialog box for maintaining SUS-specific roles appears.
    3. If required, perform the following steps:
    If the role should be displayed in the SUS User Management (UM) and should be able to be assigned to the relevant user by the supplier administrator, set the indicator to display the role in SUS UM.
    If the user should be displayed as a service agent for the purchaser, set the Service agent indicator.
    If you want to define the user as an SRM administrator, set the SRM administrator indicator. The user is then authorized to change all supplier data.
    If want to assign the role SUS administrator automatically to the user during registration, set the SUS administratorindicator.
    Sets the relevant indicators if you want users to receive the following notifications: Notification If Purchase Order Not Opened, Notification If Purchase Order Response Is Missing, Notification If ASN Is Missing, Notification If ConfirmationIs Missing, Notification If Invoice Is Missing,</u>
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

Maybe you are looking for

  • GL account balance not matching with the total stock value

    Hi, The GL account balance is not matching with the total stock value in report RM07MBSTfor stock in transit, Can anyone please let me know, where should, I look into to verify the reason for difference. Quick response will be appreciated. Thanks & R

  • Create an Error Message

    Hi All, I'am trying to create a pop up message if the user try to close the adobe reader window before filling up an Eform. So typically the user will have the form open but if the user didnt complete the form or for some reason got busy doing someth

  • Order in where clause - SQL statement

    Hi, The order of the fields in Where clause in OpenSQL statements is important to get the right index? Select a b c from t1 where  d = p_d and e = p_e Or Select a b c from t1 where  e = p_e and d = p_d Index: columns e and d. Thanks !

  • I'm new but...

    I'm already frustrated with my mac.. This might not be such a very big problem, but cannot play a simple game like Braid without get my brand new MBP 17" antiglared hot... It's just unfair... and also don't feel the graphics are doing a good job. Scr

  • Informatica - Workflow Logs: How to remove INFO "VAR_27014 [Warning!...

    Hi, this is my first post here, so plz excuse any mistakes :) I'm using Informatica PowerCenter 7.1.4. Every time there is a new workflow log created, for each session, there is set of parameters logged with the name and value pairs. INFO : TM_6292 :