Enqueue for work item n deleted by called application
Hi All
We upgraded from 4.6C till ECC6.0 and from then we receive occasionaly messages in SM21: Enqueue for work item 000001198539 deleted by called application.
This results in problems when 2 dialog task are executes after each other. Somethimes the second taks is not executed. I find in the log the following errors:
- Temporary error in result processing of work item 000001199739
- Error when loading component: Work item 000001198388 locked
- Work item 000001198388 locked by user WF-BATCH (enqueue error)
This is the head of the WF that's locked..
We implemented all relevant OSS notes regarding the message, but still we receive those messages (notes 1040693 - 1050793 etc) We are on support package SAPKB70012.
I have checked the code in our custom WF and in some background task we use a DEQUEUE_ALL. Can this be the problem? The WF worked perfectly in 4.6C.
CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_EFBKPF'
EXPORTING
* MODE_BKPF = 'E'
* MANDT = SY-MANDT
bukrs = i_bukrs
belnr = i_belnr
gjahr = i_gjahr
* X_BUKRS = ' '
* X_BELNR = ' '
* X_GJAHR = ' '
* _SCOPE = '2'
_wait = 'X'
* _COLLECT = ' '
EXCEPTIONS
foreign_lock = 1
system_failure = 2
OTHERS = 3
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
RAISE locked.
ENDIF.
UPDATE vbsegk SET zlspr = i_zlspr
WHERE ausbk = i_bukrs
AND belnr = i_belnr
AND gjahr = i_gjahr.
* and ( zlspr = 'A' or zlspr = 'Y' ) .
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_ALL'
EXPORTING
_synchron = 'X'.
Any help appriciated
Kristof
The entries we have solved by removing the DEQUEUE_ALL function in a method.
Still we receive somethimes errors in the workflow log
Temporary error in result processing of work item <n>
Message no. SWP030
Error when loading component: Work item <n> locked
Message no. SWP034
Work item <n> locked by user WF-BATCH (enqueue error)
Message no. WL605
Similar Messages
-
How to set status for work items
Hello Friend's,
As per my client current scenario every work item will be sent to 3 useru2019s .If any one of the user click on work item it will automatically call a Ztransaction for further action. Here if the user has viewed the item and back to sap inbox by clicking the back push button(in Ztransaction) without any modification or taking the any action(SAVE) then the rest of other user (2 users ) work items are disappearing from other user SAP inbox.
But my client required that whenever the user click on back button it should be READY status to all the users and it should not disappear from other user SAP inbox.
Please provide me any advice to the above requirement.Hello Ranga,
that requirement is solved here: Automatic put back workitem after execution
But as it's quite an old one, it's hard to find here by the Forum's search option.
A more advance way could also make use of the work item exits.
Best wishes,
Florin -
Dear All,
When I trigger my workflow from SWUE,the workflow containers must be populated with agent name.But it is populated only with 'US'.Please suggest.
On the other hand, when I trigger my workflow from ME21N,the workflow goes into error.The error statement is "Exception occurred - Error handling for work item 000000954797".What is the problem?
Please suggest the solution for which I will be grateful.
Thanks and regards,
S.SureshDear ,
I use bus2012 as BOR and event as created.
When I create purchase order from ME21N,bus2012 is not triggering.Instead FREBUS2012 gets triggered which is a subtype of bus2012.
At SWETYPV,event linkage is activated only for BUS2012 and there is no entry at SWETYPV for FREBUS2012.
Though I configured the workflow with start events:BUS2012->created,why FREBUS2012 should trigger my workflow which is not seen in SWETYPV?How to override it?Please suggest.
There is no start conditions for my workflow.Whenever purchase order is created,this workflow should trigger.
So,the parameters passed between even to workflow are
&_EVT_OBJECT& -> &BUS2012&
&_EVT_CREATOR& -> & WFINITIATOR&
Thanks and regards,
S.Suresh -
How to deactivate *Schedule Background Job for Work Items with Errors* SWU3
Hello Guys,
Can any one tell me how do I DEACTIVATE Schedule Background Job for Work Items with Errors in sap workflow SWU3.
Currently it is green which I don't want. I want to stop this service.
Regards
NKHello,
You could also just stop the job in tx SM37.
But why would you want to do this? As a test?
regards
Rick Bakker
hanabi technology -
Repeats for work items with temporary errors for background WI
Hi!
I have a task that generates a temporary error method in order to activate the Repeats for work items with temporary errors. It currently has 5 repeats at intervals of 2 min. After running above the WI-status is 'Error'. When Restart by SWPR runs only once and sends the message 'Work item set to error following 05 failed attempts'.
Please can tell me any way that when run again relaunch fixed repetitions.
I welcome your comments.
Thanks.
Regards,
Raisme WilhelmHi Raisme,
Please show me since it is the design of the workflow. It is probable that you are inside a repetitive sequence that send several work items.
Best Regards
Victor Enzo
Edited by: Victor Enzo Montenegro on Feb 23, 2011 3:34 PM -
Master Table for Work Items from BSP Application
hello guys,
just want to ask if there is a master table for work items (and other details) from BSP application?Hi,
Ya its true but i want to connect my customized application to UWL in Enterprise Portal and there after approval i want my workitems to be punched in R/3 system.Is there any source code available,so that my application directly contact UWL in sap enterprise Portal as a link or workitems where user should have an option to approve or reject.
If u have any idea plz let me know.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Santosh Saraf -
UWL - direct URL needed for work items
We have NetWeaver Portal EP7 and use the UWL for work items from the ECC6 backend system. The work items appear as expected and users can process them correctly.
I now have a requirement for a direct portal URL for each work item that appears in the UWL so that it can be accessed directly instead of via the UWL. However, I'm struggling in my attempts to find or construct such a URL.
I would appreciate any help to resolve this.
TrevorHi,
Why do you need this URL? If you want the recipient to be able to display a work item from within an e-mail, this can help you : [Executing or Displaying Work Items from Within a Message|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/c7/009f405660f418e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm].
Regards,
Pierre -
Show detailed screen for "WORK ITEMS"
Hi
We have configured POWL for showing Leave / Travel request. The requirement is ... we have to show detailed screen of respective item which are displaying under "Work Items", it's a combination of Leave / Travel etc.
How do I show complete detail screen of selected item which are displaying under "Work Items "???
ThanksPowl has multiples queries ie leave request and Timesheet you can all filter to see all tasks in one screen ALl the queries in the initial screen comes form POWL_COCKPIT
-
UWL: enabling the web GUI for html for work items
Hi,
We have configured UWL in portal. All the backend work items are appearing in the UWL iView in portal.
But when we click on some of the work items SAP GUI opens instead of web GUI for html.
Does any one have information what needs to be configured in UWL configuration xml file so as to enable the web GUI for html for rest of the work items?
Regards
SkHi,
We have configured UWL in portal. All the backend work items are appearing in the UWL iView in portal.
But when we click on some of the work items SAP GUI opens instead of web GUI for html.
Does any one have information what needs to be configured in UWL configuration xml file so as to enable the web GUI for html for rest of the work items?
Regards
Sk -
Error in WEB IC FOR WORK ITEM "Choose an assignment reason"
We are getting an error in WEB IC where user is trying to resubmit the work item by giving the resubmission date, re submission reason , Status, and sub status
but when users are trying to save it they are getting an error i.e. "Choose an assignment reason" and they are not able to complete the process
I know there is config for maintaining "Define Reasons for Assignment of Work Items" in SPRO under work items, but this config is not applicable since we are not assigning work item to a new unit and/or a new collection specialist, or removing any assignment. we are just re submitting the work items
Any help on this will be highly appreciated.Hi,
Just a thought - on a couple of my previous projects we had some custom CRM Fron-end validation between Work Item Sub Status and either re-assignment reason and/or Closing result code.
Perhaps check with your Development support team to ensure no such cross-validation exists upon saving.
Regards,
Ivor Martin -
Alignment of body for work item via SWNCONFIG
Hi All,
As per my present client scenario, every work item will be sent to UWL and external mail also. It means, user wants to execute the work item from external mail (Gmail or outlook)through SWNCONFIG transaction. Here my issue is as follows.
I am getting the below issue when work item goes to external mail.
Body sequence is out of alignment as you can see it in Red color below(You can observe the placement of the symbol u2018:u2019 is out of alignment).
Actual Output Required:
Item # : &MATNR&
Description : &WA_MARA.MAKTX&
Item type : &WA_MARA.ITEMTYPE&
Project ID : &WA_MARA.LPID&
Product Group : &WA_MARA.PRODUCTGRP&
Purchase / Manufacture value : &WA_MARA.PUR_MAN_VALUE&
PDM Status : &WA_MARA.PDMSTATUS&
Life Cycle Status : &WA_MARA.LCSTATUS&
Task sent by : &WA_MARA.ZUSER&
Actual Output Obtained At Present:
Item # : 1111
Description : PDM Data
Item type : PHysical Item
Project ID : Local Project ID
Product Group : Product Group
Purchase / Manufacture value : P
PDM Status : PDM Status
Life Cycle Status : Life cycle
Task sent by :
Please let me know the solution for this asap.I would really appreciate you for your help in this.
Thanks in advance..Hi!
You can try playing around with mail formats in SWNCONFIG, provided work item text is formatted using tabs, however I do not think that will help. You should format task description using SAPscript formatting symbols - SWN_SELSEN should convert it to correct output format.
Or you can create work item description in HTML - that should keep formatting everywhere. Use tab "Work item display" in your WF step, there is a demo f-n module SWL0_PREVIEW_DEMO_HTML that can be used as example.
WBR -
Pauls -
Hi Experts,
I am searching for tables that would give me work items that are un processed. Then find the responsible person who has to take action on that un processed work item.
Thanks in advance.If I understood you correctly toposmotrite table REPOSRC
but generally one most likely not be enough so that the search here
D010S
DD03L
FUPARAREF
D010T
D020SINF
D021S
D022S
D023S
DD05S
D010INC
DD08L
DD08T
D010SINF
DD12L
DD12T
DD16S
DD17S
DD20T
DD21S
DD23L
DD23T
DD24S
DD25T
DD29T
D010TAB
D010TINF
D020S
D020T
D021T
D301T
D345T
D347T
DBDIFF
DBMAPS
DD01L
DD01T
DD02L
DD02T
DD03T
DD04L
DD04T
DD06L
DD06T
DD07L
DD07T
DD09L
DD20L
DD25L
DD26S
DD27S
DD28S
DD29L
DD30L
DD30T
DD31S
DD32S
DD33S
DD35L
DD36S
DD40L
DD40T
DD42S
DDTYPES
DDTYPET
DDXTF
DDXTT
DF03L
DF03T
DF04L
DF04T
DF06L
DF06T
DF07L
DF07T
DF08L
DF08T
DF10L
DF10T
DF11L
DF11T
DF12L
DF12T
DF13L
DF13T
DF14L
DF14T
DF15L
DF15T
DF16L
DF16T
DF30S
DF34S
DF40D
DF41S
DF42S
DF43S
DIAPAR
DM02L
DM02S
DM02T
DM03S
DM25L
DM26L
DM40L
DM40T
DM41S
DM42S
DM42T
DM43T
DM45L
DM45T
DM46S
DOKHL
DOKIL
DSYST
ENLFDIR
EUDB
EUGUITEXT
EUOBJ
EUOBJEDIT
EUOBJT
FUNCT
IADB2
IADB6
IAINF
IAMSS
IAORA
IASYB
IGDB2
IGORA
LDBA
LDBB
LDBD
LDBH
LDBN
LDBNT
LDBQUAN
LDBT
MACID
MACOB
MCUSREXITS
NOTRA
RODIR
RSMPTEXTS
SEOCLASS
SEOCLASSDF
SEOCLASSEX
SEOCLASSTX
SEOCOMPO
SEOCOMPODF
SEOCOMPOEX
SEOCOMPOTX
SEOFRIENDS
SEOIMPLREL
SEOMAPATT
SEOMAPCLS
SEOMETAREL
SEOREDEF
SEOSUBCO
SEOSUBCODF
SEOSUBCOTX
SEOTYPEPLS
T100
T100A
T100O
T100T
T100U
T100X
T512CLU
TCDCOUPLES
TDCT
TERCL
TERCL2
TERCL3
TERM
TERM2
TERM3
TERM4
TERM6
TERM7
TFDIR
TFM18X
TFTIT
TGDB2
TGINF
TGORA
TITLE
TLDB
TLDBT
TLIBG
TLIBT
TMDIR
TPARA
TPARAT
TRBAT
TRDIRT
TRESC
TRMSG
TSDB6
TSINF
TSORA
TSPDD
TSTC
TSTCA
TSTCC
TSTCP
TSTCT
TSTC_SM
TSTC_SRT
TTREE
TTREEI
TTREEN
TTREEP
TTREET
TTREE_APPL
TTREE_FLNK
USOBT
WBACTIONS
WBACTIONST
WBEXTTYPES
WBOBJTYPES
WBOBJTYPT
WBREGISTRY
WBTOOLTYPE
DOKCLU
Edited by: DAV_999 on Oct 15, 2009 1:25 PM
Edited by: DAV_999 on Oct 15, 2009 1:26 PM
Edited by: DAV_999 on Oct 15, 2009 1:27 PM -
SAP workflow logs for work item forwarding.
Hi All,
I just forwarded the workitem today to around 25 users. But I dont know where does this reflect in the logs. My workflow is waiting for approval in managers inbox.
And the workflow logs says ready state. And no where that I can see the list of 30 users that I have forwarded it to !
Thanks,
AC.Hi,
I just forwarded the workitem today to around 25 users. But I dont know where does this reflect in the logs. My workflow is waiting for approval in managers inbox.
You can only forward the dialog workitem. Now go to workflow log. Clicks on agent button you will find the current agent to whom the workitme is belongs. After forwarding refresh your managers SBWP, workitem will not be there.
Thanks and regards,
SNJY -
Change in Work item Text for Approval Workflow WS14000133
Hi,
I need to change the work item text for Shopping Cart Approval Workflow WS14000133.
I have created an Attribute in Business Object BUS2121 and called the same attribute in work item text.
In PFTC -> Redefine Work item text - > and i have defined the work item text as well called the attribute from the container.
what the problem over here is - when I am passing the attribute in the work item text in the task, I am unable to see the work item text with the Dynamic Attribute but I am able to see the work item alone (not with the Dynamic attribut)
But when i debug the workflow from SWI1 then i can see the dynamic attribute in the Container of the workflow but nt in the approver's inbox in portal..
Can you please tell me - that why is this a strange behaviour that i can see the Dynamic attributed created initially in the workflow container of the Business Object but nt in the Approvers inbox either in Backend nor in the front end...
Thanks,Hi,
Maybe this SAP note/KBA will help :
1470761 - How to change the text of the SRM approval links in inbox or UWL
Kind regards,
Siobhan -
Hi All,
I need to delete/archive work item from SAP Inbox for a particular task upto a specific date only.
How can I do this.
Regards,
NeerjaHi,
Delete in test system using RSWWWIDE and RSWWHIDE reports.
Reports RSWWWIDE and RSWWHIDE are intended for internal use only. The work items are deleted from the database without further query or an authorization check. They can be started from the workflow development environment using the administration menu.
In a production system, you must archive the work items before you delete them (transaction SARA), with the object 'WORKITEM'.
Regards,
Lim...
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi Guys I am writing this on behalf of a friend of mine. To understand my issue let me explain how it started. My friend has a apple ID with email address (lets call it) [email protected] when activating iCloud on her iPhone a email was sent to ve
-
Function module for calculating planned and actual cost of production order
Hi , Do we have any standard function module for calculating planned and actual cost for production order? i need to implement this in a Z-report. Thanks Srini
-
I imported about 150 photos today from a shoot into Lightroom, and began to edit them. A few hours later, I got a message on my computer that my hard drive was full, so I made space by deleting some old files. When I opened up Lightroom, I found that
-
SQL 2008 how to compare & identify data among 2 tables with same structure ?
Hello is there a TSQL way of comparing row by row for example comparing DateTimeStamp field in 2 separate tables with same structure in identifying if it's data was changed (If Table1.DateField > Table2.DateField THEN UPDATE it's entire row to match
-
Help - doesn't Arch support my computer anymore? [solved]
I had a fine Arch Linux system running on my Laptop, until yesterday's package upgrade - which pulled in xf86-video-intel-2.10.0-1. For some reason, this new version of the intel video driver now requires kernel modesetting being enabled. This puts m