Repeats for work items with temporary errors for background WI

Hi!
I have a task that generates a temporary error method in order to activate the Repeats for work items with temporary errors. It currently has 5 repeats at intervals of 2 min. After running above the WI-status is 'Error'. When Restart by SWPR runs only once and sends the message 'Work item set to error following 05 failed attempts'.
Please can tell me any way that when run again relaunch fixed repetitions.
I welcome your comments.
Thanks.
Regards,
Raisme Wilhelm

Hi Raisme,
Please show me since it is the design of the workflow. It is probable that you are inside a repetitive sequence that send several work items.
Best Regards
Victor Enzo
Edited by: Victor Enzo Montenegro on Feb 23, 2011 3:34 PM

Similar Messages

  • How to deactivate *Schedule Background Job for Work Items with Errors* SWU3

    Hello Guys,
    Can any one tell me how do I DEACTIVATE Schedule Background Job for Work Items with Errors in sap workflow SWU3.
    Currently it is green which I don't want. I want to stop this service.
    Regards
    NK

    Hello,
    You could also just stop the job in tx SM37.
    But why would you want to do this? As a test?
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    hanabi technology

  • Error handling for work item

    Dear All,
         When I trigger my workflow from SWUE,the workflow containers must be populated with agent name.But it is populated only with 'US'.Please suggest.
         On the other hand, when I trigger my workflow from ME21N,the workflow goes into error.The error statement is "Exception occurred - Error handling for work item 000000954797".What is the problem?
        Please suggest the solution for which I will be grateful.
    Thanks and regards,
    S.Suresh

    Dear ,
    I use bus2012 as BOR and event as created.
    When I create purchase order from ME21N,bus2012 is not triggering.Instead FREBUS2012 gets triggered which is a subtype of bus2012.
    At SWETYPV,event linkage is activated only for BUS2012 and there is no entry at SWETYPV for FREBUS2012.
    Though I configured the workflow with start events:BUS2012->created,why FREBUS2012 should trigger my workflow which is not seen in SWETYPV?How to override it?Please suggest.
    There is no start conditions for my workflow.Whenever purchase order is created,this workflow should trigger.
    So,the parameters passed between even to workflow are 
    &_EVT_OBJECT&    ->        &BUS2012&
    &_EVT_CREATOR&   ->     & WFINITIATOR&
    Thanks and regards,
    S.Suresh

  • Enqueue for work item n deleted by called application

    Hi All
    We upgraded from 4.6C till ECC6.0 and from then we receive occasionaly messages in SM21: Enqueue for work item 000001198539 deleted by called application.
    This results in problems when 2 dialog task are executes after each other. Somethimes the second taks is not executed. I find in the log the following errors:
    - Temporary error in result processing of work item 000001199739
    - Error when loading component: Work item 000001198388 locked
    - Work item 000001198388 locked by user WF-BATCH (enqueue error)
    This is the head of the WF that's locked..
    We implemented all relevant OSS notes regarding the message, but still we receive those messages (notes 1040693 - 1050793 etc) We are on support package SAPKB70012.
    I have checked the code in our custom WF and in some background task we use a DEQUEUE_ALL. Can this be the problem? The WF worked perfectly in 4.6C.
      CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_EFBKPF'
       EXPORTING
    *   MODE_BKPF            = 'E'
    *   MANDT                = SY-MANDT
         bukrs                = i_bukrs
         belnr                = i_belnr
         gjahr                = i_gjahr
    *   X_BUKRS              = ' '
    *   X_BELNR              = ' '
    *   X_GJAHR              = ' '
    *   _SCOPE               = '2'
         _wait                = 'X'
    *   _COLLECT             = ' '
       EXCEPTIONS
         foreign_lock         = 1
         system_failure       = 2
         OTHERS               = 3
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
        RAISE locked.
      ENDIF.
      UPDATE vbsegk SET zlspr = i_zlspr
                    WHERE ausbk = i_bukrs
                      AND belnr = i_belnr
                      AND gjahr = i_gjahr.
    *                and ( zlspr = 'A' or zlspr = 'Y' ) .
      COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
      CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_ALL'
           EXPORTING
                _synchron = 'X'.
    Any help appriciated
    Kristof

    The entries we have solved by removing the DEQUEUE_ALL function in a method.
    Still we receive somethimes errors in the workflow log
    Temporary error in result processing of work item <n>
    Message no. SWP030
    Error when loading component: Work item <n> locked
    Message no. SWP034
    Work item <n> locked by user WF-BATCH (enqueue error)
    Message no. WL605

  • Region Monitoring iOS 7 : didEnterRegion method is not calling when app is killed by user or by OS in iOS 7 only. It is working fine when it is in background. and the same code is working fine with iOS 6 for both app in suspended mode and background mode.

    Region Monitoring iOS 7 : didEnterRegion method is not calling when app is killed by user or by OS in iOS 7 only. It is working fine when it is in background. and the same code is working fine with iOS 6 for both app in suspended mode and background mode. What changes I have to made to work great in iOS 7 also.

    I rewrote code for debugging purpose and tried to catch error using GetLastError();  method,
    but it only printed 0. Below is code snippet; I think Create() throw an exception
    and code goes to catch block. 
    LONG ConnectTS(CString strIP, UINT n_Port)
    try{
              ErrorLog(0,0,"ConnectTS is calling Create [is going to call]","");
              if(!Create())
    // Exception Line
    n_Err = GetLastError();
    return NET_INIT;
    catch(...)
                       DWORD errorCode = GetLastError();
                       CString errorMessage
                       errorMessage.Format("%lu",errorCode);
                       ErrorLog (0, 0, "Image
    System", (LPTSTR)(LPCTSTR)errorMessage);
                       return  IS_ERR_WINDOWS;
    Output: -
    ConnectTS is calling Create [is going to call]
    Image System
    0

  • There are still batch split items with quantity X for item

    Our current system is ECC6. The deletion of item in the delivery (TO
    confirmed) is different before ECC6 (4.6C). In 4.6, unless quantity of
    batch split items are zeroed out in the delivery, the item cannot be
    deleted. Message "There are still batch split items with quantity X for
    item" is encountered. In ECC, line item can be deleted even batch split
    items are not 0. The message doesn't exist in ECC6.
    Please advise how to activate this message.

    In ECC6, the logic has been completely changed during item deletion.
    Now, there is no way to activate the message VL224 when deleting batch item.
    In 46c,
    FORM XLIPS_LOESCHEN_PRUEFEN is called with XL_ERROR = 'X'.
    Main program     SAPFV50P
    Source code of   FV50PFLP_XLIPS_LOESCHEN_RC
    FORM XLIPS_LOESCHEN_RC
               IF IF_TABIX IS INITIAL.
                 REFRESH LT_REASONS.
                 PERFORM XLIPS_LOESCHEN_PRUEFEN TABLES   LT_REASONS      <<<<<<
                                                USING    LF_POSNR
                                                         CHARX        <<<<<<<
                                                         IF_ALL
                                                CHANGING LF_EXIT.
    In ECC6,
    The FORM is called with XL_ERROR = SPACE. That's why the error is not issued.
    Actually, they are called from different place in ECC and 46c. The logic has  been completely changed.
    Main Program     SAPMV50A
    Source code of   MV50AF0D        
    FORM DELETE_ITEMS_CHECK                                      
               perform xlips_loeschen_pruefen(sapfv50p) tables   ct_reasons   <<<<<
                                                        using    ls_admin-posnr
                                                                 space
                                                                 space   <<<<
                                                                 'GHK' "n_766525
                                                        changing lf_exit.

  • How to find open SO Items with tax code for a particular day?

    Dear all
    If i want to see all open SOs(items), with tax code for a particular day, how to find using table VBAP in SE16?
    Please guide me
    Edited by: Julius Bussche on Mar 3, 2009 11:10 PM
    Please use descriptive subject titles and the search

    Hi GB,
    Its always better to see through the standard reports , as you will be able to see the aditional info as well.
    In the case of table in se16 you will be able to see one table at a time and then you need to manually figure out the fields that required.
    For example if you want to see the sales order details through tables then
    1.You have to go to VBAK to see the document type and then you need to go to VBAP to see the items , it means that you need to access 2 tables for this simple thing ....
    In standard reports there will be lot of joins between the tables and you can view the data more elobarately as weel.
    Note : In general if you want to see the complete details of the documents(open), then pls use the reports.
    Regards,
    Vvieks

  • GR going to wrong GL account for PO Item with Account Assignment Category M

    Hi Experts,
    I need some help on GR posting for PO Item with M as AAC.
    PO1 for material ABC with M as  Account Assignment Category, when I book GR for this Item, the GL document generated as below.
    Dr: PRD  (Cost Price Differences)
    Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
    The material ABC price control is "S" and already have standard cost.
    For another material DEF which have ascetically same master data as  ABC and got a similar PO2 with M as Account Assignment Category.
    But the GR document as below.
    Dr: BSX (Inventory)
    Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
    How can be one same setting got so different results, is there any data in Material or PO make these differences?
    Actually the results for material DEF is what we want, how could I avoid the GR results for material ABC.
    Thanks~

    Thanks you Mukthar,
    I have checked all the information and porcess for both material and did a lot of testing in testing system.
    Here is what I found.
    Case
    Material ABC  SO: 1111   PO: 6666 (ACC:M)
    Material DEF  SO:2222    PO: 7777(ACC:M)
    All the information in material mast data, SO, PO are the same.
    The differences is that:
    PO:6666 post GR before Material ABC's standard price release. So the first GR document as below
    Dr: PRD  (Cost Price Differences)
    Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
    This is correct document without material stand cost.
    The problem we reverse the fist GR document, release standard cost for Material ABC. Then re-do the GR. but the GL document still book into  PRD instead of BSX.
    If I create a new SO:3333 and PO:8888 (with ACC M) for material ABC now.
    The GR could be book into BSX.
    It seem like once the PO got GR with 0 standard cost, even I relesed a new price for the material and re do the GR, it still take the previous 0 cost to book inventory which make all the amount into PRD.
    Quite Strange

  • Master Table for Work Items from BSP Application

    hello guys,
    just want to ask if there is a master table for work items (and other details) from BSP application?

    Hi,
          Ya its true but i want to connect my customized application to UWL in Enterprise Portal and there after approval i want my workitems to be punched in R/3 system.Is there any source code available,so that my application directly contact UWL in sap enterprise Portal as a link or workitems where user should have an option to approve or reject.
    If u have any idea plz let me know.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Santosh Saraf

  • CFCHART only works for pie, invalid attribute: autoAdjust Error for all other types

    CFCHART only works for pie, invalid attribute: autoAdjust
    Error for all other types.
    Im just trying to render a simple bar chart, and it works on
    the developer server, but not in production.
    Any tips?
    Dave

    It's 7.0.2
    But I have not tried this yet...
    ColdFusion MX 7.0.2 Cumulative Hot Fix 2
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=kb400996
    I'm worried that If I apply that hotfix, something else will
    break :(
    ANd I wont be able to un=do it, and I'm not able to
    re-install CF if it all goes tits up.

  • UWL - direct URL needed for work items

    We have NetWeaver Portal EP7 and use the UWL for work items from the ECC6 backend system. The work items appear as expected and users can process them correctly.
    I now have a requirement for a direct portal URL for each work item that appears in the UWL so that it can be accessed directly instead of via the UWL. However, I'm struggling in my attempts to find or construct such a URL.
    I would appreciate any help to resolve this.
    Trevor

    Hi,
    Why do you need this URL? If you want the recipient to be able to display a work item from within an e-mail, this can help you : [Executing or Displaying Work Items from Within a Message|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/c7/009f405660f418e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm].
    Regards,
    Pierre

  • Execute Work Items with Outlook  (WF)

    Abapers, where i can find information about execute work items with outlook??
    Can you suggest me some links?

    Take a look at the documentation for report RSWUWFML or RSWUWFML2.
    Or if you want a richer integration with Outlook, like e-mails disappearing when the work item is finished, then take a look at http://www.desktopworkplace.com.
    Cheers,
    Scott

  • Error in WEB IC FOR WORK ITEM "Choose an assignment reason"

    We are getting an error in WEB IC where user is trying to resubmit the work item by giving the resubmission date, re submission reason , Status, and sub status
    but when users are trying to save  it they are getting an error i.e. "Choose an assignment reason" and they are not able to complete the process
    I know there is config for maintaining "Define Reasons for Assignment of Work Items" in SPRO under work items, but this config is not applicable since we are not assigning work item to a new unit and/or a new collection specialist, or removing any assignment.  we are just re submitting the work items
    Any help on this will be highly appreciated.

    Hi,
    Just a thought - on a couple of my previous projects we had some custom CRM Fron-end validation between Work Item Sub Status and either re-assignment reason and/or Closing result code.
    Perhaps check with your Development support team to ensure no such cross-validation exists upon saving.
    Regards,
    Ivor Martin

  • Error while opening work item in Inbox sbwp for verifcaion of right invoice

    Hi,
    I am working on SAP workflow with IXOS.
    I faced  a problem in opening the workitem when it came into the inbox.
    In nomal scenario when i click on the workitem under workflow folder in my inbox, it opens the attached document in document viewer, i can see the attached document ,and after verifying it ,i can furher process it.
    But now when i click on the work item in my inbox it directly takes me to the next processing window, without opening the attached document for my verification, so i am unable to check that i am processing the right invoice.
    Please help.

    Yes, it was working fine before.
    And also the problem generally rise in afternoon.

  • Execute Work Item: Invalid Link (SWN155)  for WD ABAP task ?

    Dear all,
    I have created a workflow task with WEBSERVICE object and configured task visualization with WD ABAP application.
    When i am executing the work item through  SAP Inbox , the application is triggering successfully.
    But when the work item is transmitted to Outlook through Extended notifications configuration i am getting the error
    Execute Work Item: Invalid Link (SWN155).
    We have already implemented the 1381164 and 1164090 OSS notes.
    We don't have UWL, the link need to be opened the WD application directly.
    I am unable to find the error.
    Please help to solve the issue.
    Thanks,
    Vamshi

    Hi,
    Have you checked OSS for possible fixes? It might that this was something that was clearly a bug, and not matter what you do, it will not work, unless you implement some fix.
    Regards,
    Karri
    PS. The note is 966681
    Edited by: Karri Kemppi on Oct 27, 2009 9:26 PM

Maybe you are looking for