Entering invoice for additional cost.

Hi,
I have a PO with some 200 line items and 3 header conditions.
I did migo and done MIRO also.Now I want to enter an invoice for subsequent debit for a value of say 200 EUR.
How can I apportion this in to all the 200 items ?
Is there any better approach ?
Secondly, If I want to enter an invoice only for unplanned delivery cost.When I try to do this the balance does not get zero.
Wher should I enter values.
Assuming 200 Eur , I put the value as unplanned cost then to balance out this where shall I put this 200Eur in invoice ?
I have 100 line items in PO.
Please suggest.
regards,
manOO

Hi,
Thx again for the explaination.However I am facing some issues and needs guidance from you.
When I enter invoice for vendor I always get some differences in the supplier invoice and the SAP value.Please suggest the approach in following cases:
1.
Invoice amount in supplier invoice greater than SAP suggested value.
The supplier invoice is correct but somhow SAP invoice shows lesser values.It sometimes goes to level of 50-60 USD.
In fact the user enters the PO based on the actual invoice since it comes with the shipment before GR(import procedure)
Still it gives differences.
If I want to accept vendor invoice then how can I adjust that difference in SAP.
Normally a PO comprises of 200-300 lines.In that case how can the value be apportioned on each line suggested by SAP ?
2.
Sometimes the SAP value comes more than vendor invoice.In this case how to adjust the invoice ? I can not put the exact value as received from vendor.
3.
In most scenarios I have PO with header conditions of 3-4 types(all copied from freight).However these are the conditions used for clearing charges,freight charges misc. charges etc and many a times they are to be paid to the local supplier.
If I have a exchange rate maintained on PO header and made it as fixed and my local currency is different(example: Goods supplier currency-EUR and Local clearing agent currency-say AED), then when I do invoice the exchange rate will be only applicable to the Goods supplier.Correct ?
When I enter Invoice for the same PO for Delivery costs which is a local vendor, it will not pick up the exchange rate mentioned in the PO.Correct ? It will pick  the existing exchange rate maintained in system. Correct ?
4.
When can I use subsequent debit or subsequent credit considering my scenarios.
Thanks in advance.request you to answer the questions and suggest the approach.
Regards,
manOO

Similar Messages

  • Entering Invoices for an EXPIRED Blanket PO

    Hi All,
    Howcome the system lets me enter Invoices for an expired Blanket PO (when the Validity End date has passed) but there is a remaining amount in the overall limit (for example, out of 1,000 USD limit....Invoices upto only 700USD entered....so 300USD remaining...but the Blanket PO is expired).
    I thought what ever comes first --- the Value Limit OR the Validity End date would block further invoices for payment?
    Isn't this the case?
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: Duke Dukester on Sep 17, 2008 12:07 AM
    Edited by: Duke Dukester on Sep 17, 2008 12:10 AM

    On a framework order by setting the item category to B will invoke the
    Limit functionality on the PO. The expected value will be the price
    that appears on the PO. The overall value is the absolute limit that
    the system will accept against this PO. The overall value can be larger
    than the expected value, never less.
    Using MIRO; (1) enter the invoice date, reference # and amount of
    invoice. (2) enter the PO #, (3) ensure the display variant = account
    assignment - cost center. (4) click on the yellow arrow icon in the
    account assignment column, (5) enter the invoice amount on the first
    line of the account assignment box, (6) click the BACK button on the
    account assignment box, (7) the traffic light should now be green and
    you can save your invoice.
    regards
    kunal
    award if helpful

  • MIRO take long time when enter invoice for PO with GR-based invoice

    Hi,
    In my client system, system take long time for extracting PO data while booking invoice via. MIRO for the purchase order which have GR-based IV is marked. However system take few second for extracting PO data when enter invoice via. MIRO for the PO which don't have GR-based IV. Please note following point while providing the solution:
    - this problem is exist only for the purchase order related to one company code. However system working perfectly for other company code in the same client. Hence we assuming that some company code level cofiguration is missing.
    - the problem is exist for po with account assignment K.
    - we have one to one mapping for purchase organization to company code to plant.
    Appreciate for you quick respond. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    sp sahu

    Hi,
    Please check with FI guy for GL A/c and Cost centers which you are using to create the PO with item category K.
    Still problem permits check with your ABAP person.
    Regards,
    Mohd Ali.

  • Entering invoice for a blanket PO

    Dear Experts,
    please I need your assistance, as I have  created a blanket PO , In the invoice for the blanket PO I entered the amount and the tax, the balance was still showing red, could not calculate the tax as it was giving me 0.00, since the blanket PO being referred to in the invoice has no  amount, please I will need your assistance to resolve this problem.
    Thanks for your anticipated assistance.

    Hi
    Please check following link
    Blanket PO/invoice
    Regards
    Kailas

  • Invoice for landed costs

    Dear forum members,
    I'd like to know how can I create an invoice for a landed cost document linked to a GRPO. How can I link an invoice from - e.g. the transporter company - to the landed cost document I've created?
    Any suggestion?
    Thanks in advance
    Victor Cau

    Hi Gordon Du, Manuel Barreto
    Gordon:
    My conclusion, and as I understood from Robert Czik's postings (Links), is that in B1 2007 there is no way one can post an invoice for the landed costs document. So if I receive an invoice from the company that took the items from the airport to my company, the only way to create an invoice in the system is starting a Purchasing process from the beginning (PO then GRPO then IN).
    Thank you very much.
    Manuel:
    I think there is a missunderstanding from you. But any way, I thank you for your attention.
    Thanks & Regards
    Victor

  • Common practice for additional cost like banking fees on PO's

    Hi
    Is it common practice to use the Freight functions for other cost like banking fee or other fees?
    Can it be set up with different freight types that the user does not have to enter a value, instead he can just pick the type of freight and automatically gets the correct value?
    I tried, but I it die not work ... its always 0 as proposed value.
    Thanks
    Franz

    Hi,
       Since freight is an expense, you can use this functionality wherein expense is involved, there is no wrong in this. Unless you have to keep in mind that the expense occurred in the freight tab would include in the itemcost if you run the item valuation.
    To make the value come automatically you have to customize a bit. My idea would be define a user defined table, enter all the values required in it and apply a formatted search in the amount field which pulls the data from the user defined table.
    Hope you understood.
    Regards,
    Aditya

  • Invoices for delivery costs

    Hi
    i need to close an import PO line item and am trying to delete it. however it gives me the error that the "Invoices are pending for delivery costs". i checked and found that the delivery costs invoicing has been done and the customs vendor paid. can anyone suggest how to go about it . thanks in advance
    regards
    Gurvinder

    Hi Gurvinder,
    First of all understand that, if any followup document was created on the System against the Purchase Order line item. then it is not possible ot delete it.
    I belive, you want to delete it 'coz you had acknowledge the partial qty against that line item and payment is also cleared. and further you are not expecting any more deliveries against that item. If that is the case, then change the Po item Qty with the GRN qty and manually marked the Delivery Completion indicator. So that this particular line item will be closed for further GRN Processing.
    Secondly, if it is not the case, then you have to delete/ reverse all the followup documents like Payment reversal, MIRO reversal and GRN Reversal. After that you will be able to do it.
    Regards,
    S Anand.

  • Inventorising a condition (for additional cost)

    All SAP Gurus,
    We have created a new condition type, cost of which needed to be inventorised (loaded on the material value).
    What settings we need to maintain for inventorising this newly created condition?
    Regards,

    Hi
    Add the new condition type in your calculation schema in the steps/counters as desired based upon your calculations requirement and put the from & to details. Once set , check the calculations working , by creating a PO & subsequent GR in your test/dev system. You may or may not have the account key & accrual key settings for the condition type you have added, depends upon your requirement.
    Regards

  • Additional cost in invoice

    Hello Experts,
    Greetings,
    My issue is that while creating the invoice through transaction code MIR7,it does not consider the additional cost which was entered in purchase order.
    Please advice what could be the problem or how to do this to get those additional cost in SAP?
    Best Rgds
    Nitin

    Hello Sir,
    Thanks for the reply.It shows the line items for additional cost now in invoice.But while saving the document it asks for "Enter G/L ACCOUNT".Can you please tell me where we have to enter the g/l code?
    One more thing I would like to know is that the additional cost we have entered manually in line items,Will it has to be copied from PO or user has enter it manually always.
    Please do let me know.
    Thanks
    Nitin

  • Condition type for pricing came from PC but has not included the additive cost record

    hello all;
    we have the pricing base for the sales order with the estimated cost from pc; our costing process has a posting record for additive cost is not included on the total cost is sent to the condition type EK02.
    question: It is possible to include these kind of postings?, in fact, these record apear on the costing report as part of the cost of sales..
    thanks in advanced...

    Hi Francisco
    Two things,
    1. Your condition type must be EK01 if you wanna use it in
    Pricing
    2. Additive cost in CK74 is at the level of material and plant. It is not at the level of sales order
    If you wish to add costs manually in sales order cost estimate, then use Unit Costing as the costing method in your requirement class
    Or use Product costing as costing method and use a costing sheet
    Br. Ajay M

  • Invoice Approval not required for certain cost centres

    Hi - Can anyone advise how to setup in R12 so that AP Invoices for certain Cost Centers do not require approval in Payables Invoice Approval, Approvals Management?
    Thanks

    In PTARQ --> Customizing --> ESS > Service Specific Settings > Working Time > Leave Request > Processing Processes > Specify Processing Processes for Types of Leave, for each combination of rule group, PS grouping and absence type where approval is not required, untick the "Requests have to be approved" flag.
    I haven't tried this as we haven't had the need, but I assume it will work.

  • Additive Cost and Variance Calcultion

    We started using Tcode CK74N to enter additive costs for certian materials. I did the configuration needed in the costing variant and added a cost element for additive costs in the cost component structure.
    Everything is working fine, when we run CK11n for a material that already have an additive cost estimate, the additive costs are being picked up and included in the cost estimate. if we mark and release the cost estimate the additive costs are being reflected in the new standard, so far so good.
    My question is around the variance postings that happen once we enter a production order and settle the variance at period end.
    lets look at this example
    Assume the following:
    Material X current standard = $100
    Order X quantity produced =10 cases
    Material X NEW standard after negative additive cost =$80
    Scenario 1 (no additive costs) the total debits (Actual postings form material consumption and activity confirmation) to a the order = $900
    The total credit was $1000 (standard*quantity produced) , a $100 in variance will occur, and the posting at settlement will be to Debit the price difference account and to credit the cost of sales account for $100. This is the normal case
    Scenario 2 : We included a -$200 of additive costs for that material in the standard (new Standard is 80) , the credit to the order will be $800 instead of $1000 , which will make the variance -$200 and the posting currently is to DR cost of sales and credit price difference account for $200
    The business and Based on scenario 2 wants to automatically generate a posting to the ACTUAL side of the production order equivalent to the additional variance caused by additive costs? which will put the variance back at 100.
    They would like to see a credit to the cost element used in the cost component structure to book additive costs. and the reminder of the variance 100 in our example should continue to be booked to the same price different account .
    If this is possible and right to do? what account should be used to offset this credit that being proposed to the additive cost element ? Because I assume that a new FI document should be created to record the credit?
    Thanks for your help

    Hey,
    It depends a little upon the settlement rule of your process/production order.
    If you are settling to the material (MAT), the price difference will only be accounted for with one line, without separation between difference coming from additive costs and other differences.
    If you are settling not via within CO, you maybe have the possibility the way you settle, but I can not see how you can use such a logic in a settlement process.
    What I would do, is to create a custom reposting program, which reposts the additive cost difference separately, after which the normal settlement can take care of the remaining difference.
    Regards,
    Koen

  • Additive costs and LSMW

    Hi ,
    I have LSMW for Additive cost upload, but unfortunately we have additive cost for all materilas  valid up to 9999 year so when ever we use LSMW for upload we need to hit (as it gives that screen showing previous additive cost estimate as it over laps) ENTER for so many times until we finish all materilas, so
    can any one please tell me how to delete all additive costs which is maintainted till 9999 , so that we don't get any messages during LSMW upload?
    Paartha

    Suraj,
    Don't mind As both my issues are inte-rrelated I am dragging our conversaton, I saw that Field in KEKO-KKZMA, but it is Just a indicator that says this product is having some Additive costs, But not the Dollar amount,
    S_ALR_87099930 the regular cost estimates report from the Field selection I can Have Additive costs but even this shows Blank, i really wonder "where can I see the actual dollar amount" or any Document that saves the data, Just Like a price change Document, as you said you guys developed the Z report (to be frank I couldn't do this in My last Project, Now I got the same requirement here with new Client) , If you can let me know the main Tables you (MARA, MARC, MBEW, KEKO, KEPH) you took as base,?
    and where can I see actaul dollar amount, even in CK76N It won't show "the dolalr amount" for materials it Just Lists all materilas from where you need to Click and go in side to see the dollar amount,
    If you want you can reply to below thread I will close  this Thread,
    Additive costs :Report
    Regards
    Paartha

  • Error when posting invoice for Asset purchase order

    Hi,
    we are getting the errore message account determination for asset posting with keys not defined in chart of accounts,when posting an invoice for asset purchase order.
    Can any one see why this error is coming and what will be the solution.
    Nagesh

    Hi Prabhakar,
    Here is the reply,
    we have 10 line items,in which 3 items are freight related and other 7 items are related to goods reciept.
    i am trying to enter invoice for 3 line items at a time with two relevant to goods reciept and other related to non goods receipt(freight related).
    accounting entries generated after the GR are as follows,
    asset under construction account,and GR/IR account.
    Let me know the details is sufficient or not.

  • STO Accounting entries for indirect costs

    Hi experts,
    I have following scenario:
    Plant A
    Quantity Update
    Plant B
    Value/Quantity Updatae
    Then I create STO from plant A to Plant B. Include Indirect costs. No accounting entries is getting generated at goods issues nor goods receipt. System allows me to introduce invoice for indirect costs through miro. However, it doesn't propose the values as it happens in purchase orders.
    Is there anything in custominzing I am missing.
    Thanks.

    But that's not the standard behaviour (i know it's strange, I made that error myself in the past).
    Remove the K, and the system will make the posting to the cost element defined in OKB9.

Maybe you are looking for