EOF on communication channel

Hi,
I'm trying to install 11g onto XP. However, when database configuration assistant starts, it fails with:
ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
ORA-24342: service handle not initialized
ORA-01041: intenral error. Hostdef extension doesn't exist
I was able to install 11g onto this machine a month or so ago, but last week it stopped working. I uninstalled it and can't install it back.
Any ideas?
Regards
Jernej

Try to perform a software only install, once your 11g binaries are installed, manually launch the dbca, and check the database creation logs. If the deinstall procedure was not properly made, then it could have left configuration files behind, which are preventing the current installation to successfully perform.
~ Madrid

Similar Messages

Error during import: eof on communication channel

Oracle 8.1.7.4.1 on Win2k
Hi there,
I'm trying to import a dump into an existing schema:
imp GIDAC/GIDAC@NT3 file=EXPGIDAC.dmp LOG=IMPORT.LOG FROMUSER=GIDAC TOUSER=GIDAC buffer=256000 commit=Y analyze=N
Objects were exported by SYSTEM, not by GIDAC, but it goes on.
When Oracle tries to import the first wrapped package structure, I get an ORA-03113 end-of-file on communication channel, and the import process stops. Always at the first wrapped package structure.
Oracle database versions are exactly the same (8.1.7.4.1)
Any idea about that?
Thanks a lot, Mark

Unfortunately I do not have access to Metalink.
I'm quite sure it's something related with wrapped packages: I've dropped that package from the source db (it was an old one, no more needed), exported the schema and launched the import process again, this time without any problem. It seems that importing/recompiling wrapped packages takes a lot of time, may be Oracle disconnects me after a while, due to a kind of timeout, don't know.
Thanks a lot to everybody,
Mark

ORA-03113 : end-of-file on communication channel while running a SQL Query

Hi,
While executing the following query, we are facing ORA-03113 : EOF on communication channel error.
SELECT
FROM QDF_CLSS_SHENG_HIST
/*WHERE* a.FACT_TYPE_CODE='BS'
AND */
WHERE (SRCE_SYS_ID = 850 OR (SRCE_SYS_ID IN (1747,1764) AND GEO_ID IN (826,372) AND PRTTN_BY_FUNC_DATE>=to_date('20060701','YYYYMMDD') ))
When we remove one of the values in the SRCE_SYS_ID's 'IN' condition the error is not thrown, e.g.
WHERE (SRCE_SYS_ID = 850 OR (SRCE_SYS_ID IN (1747) AND GEO_ID IN (826,372) AND PRTTN_BY_FUNC_DATE>=to_date('20060701','YYYYMMDD') ))
The version of the Database we are using is 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi. Is this a common error in this version of the database because when we ran the same query in a 9i database we got no such error.
P.S : QDF_CLSS_SHENG_HIST table is partitioned on SRCE_SYS_ID and PRTTN_BY_FUNC_DATE
Thanks,
Puneeth

Yes, we get the same error and no dumps are getting created.It might be interesting to look at a trace file for this SQL statement with event 10046 at level 12 and event 10053 at level 1 enabled for the session. You may need to modify the query slightly to make certain that a hard parse is required (possibly by specifying a couple of the column names to be returned rather than *). Take a look through the raw trace file for something like this
cost: -1.#IND card: 1.#INFThere is at least one query in the ERP package that I use that will output the following in a 10053 trace when optimizer_features_enable is greater than 10.1.0.4, followed by an ORA-600:
Access Path: index (AllEqUnique)
    Index: SYS_C004588
    resc_io: 1.00 resc_cpu: 8341
    ix_sel: 0.5 ix_sel_with_filters: 0.5
    NL Join: Cost: 1.#J Resp: 1.#J Degree: 1
      Cost_io: 1.#J Cost_cpu: 1
      Resp_io: 1.#J Resp_cpu: 1
Best NL cost: 1797693134862315700000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000.00
          resc: 3.01 resc_io: 3.00 resc_cpu: 35947
          resp: 3.01 resp_io: 3.00 resp_cpu: 35947
Outer Join Card: 1.#J = max ( outer (1.#J), (outer (1.#J) * inner (2.00) * sel (0.5) )
Join Card - Rounded: 1 Computed: 1.#JYou may be experiencing a similar problem that might become evident with both trace events enabled.
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

End-of-communication channel while executing sqlldr from java procedure

Hi all,
I am having 10g 10.1.0.3.1 ( Infrastructure ) on linux, I am executing Sql Loader
( sqlldr ) from client (XP) using java stored procedure. After loading the data I am getting Error - ( end-of-communication channel). But same java procedure is working fine without any error on 10g without (Infrastructure). Is this problem is becuase of infrastructure or some patch has to be installed on the database. For my satisfaction I reinstalled java Virtual Machine on database with the help of
( initjvm.sql ). But problem is still there. Any idea what exactly the problem is.
SKM

This is the most frequently asked question from Oracle developers.. Never mind putting some light on this error, I want to put it alight! ;-)
First thing. It is not The Error. It is a sympton of an error.
This message does not come from the database. It comes from the client OCI (of JDBC) drivers - which suddenly discovered that the Oracle connection (usually a TCP socket connection) has been torn down at the server side. It attempts to write to that socket, only to find that the other party has hung up.
Why has the other party hung up? That party is either a Dedicated Server Process or a Dispatcher Process. If a dedicated server dies (crashes), it will take its socket handles with it to The Great Recycle Bin In The Sky. If you was serviced by a shared server and it died, the Dispatcher (who handles the TCP comms for it), will automatically close that shared server's connection.
Usually when a process dies on the Oracle server, it leaves behind an error in the alert log, and trace files. That is where you will find the inklings of what The Error was that caused your client to get the EOF on comms channel message.

Open and close communication channel in one link

Hello,
I implement with successful the scenario that described in this blog:
Control Communication Channels Externally without using RWB
Right now I use with this link to start the CC
http://aaaa:50000/AdapterFramework/ChannelAdminServlet?party=*&service=Open_Friday_Service_Sender&channel=Open_Friday_Sender&action=start
And with this link to stop the CC
http://aaaa:50000/AdapterFramework/ChannelAdminServlet?party=*&service=Open_Friday_Service_Sender&channel=Open_Friday_Sender&action=stop
I looking for the way to start and stop the communication channel in one link.
Elad

hi elan
i think you need to write an abap program and schedule it..
abap program will call this HTTP link as The URL has no dependency on where it is called.
regards
kummari

Using a variable in communication channel

Hi,
I have a lot of Communication Channels looking for files in the same directory. This directory's path will be changed soon and so I assume I'll have to change all my Communication Channels.
I was wondering whether there was a means of using a variable for the Source Directory in order to just have to change its value where it is defined and not every where it is used...
Regards
Yann

Hi,
Is this a sender file adapter? or a receiver file adapter?
You can make a change / make the receiver file adapter's directory dynamic by setting the value during runtime in the mapping.
Use this blog and the code in the blog to acheive this,
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/10/xi-the-same-filename-from-a-sender-to-a-receiver-file-adapter--sp14
Sender File adapter, I dont think this is possible.
Regards,
Bhavesh

Error in the SOAP Receiver communication channel

Hi ,
My scenario is RFC - to -SOAP (synchronous ) i have specified the TARGET URL inthe SOAP receiver comminication chanel.. but while testing the interface by providing the test data from R/3 .. I'm not getting any Respose.. ..
If I check in the SXMB_MONI in i'm getting the following message .. but the URL whicjh i provided that is fine.. but my doubt is through XI may be it's not able to connect the Target System... .. so, please suggest me...
<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapterFramework</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MESSAGE">GENERAL</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: www.webservicex.net</SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack />
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
regards
Jain

By default, the SOAP adapter sends the SOAP message with the content type text/xml.
When you check "Do not use SOAP envelope", the default contnet type is application/xml.
You can change the content type like this: Go to the SOAP receiver communication channel module tab. Add the module "localejbs/AF_Modules/MessageTransformBean" before the standard module. Add the parameter name Transform.ContentType and value text/xml.
Check out this
/people/varadharajan.krishnasamy/blog/2007/01/09/troubleshooting-soap-message--xi
One way of testing ur scenario
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/08/25/xi-sending-a-message-without-the-use-of-an-adapter-not-possible
Also have a look here
SAP Note 856597
reward points if solution found helpfull
regards
chandrakanth

How to set up the communication channel for third party idoc

Hello,
I am trying to send an idoc from an sap 4.6c system to an third party system. The third party system is supporting idcos with trfc.
My problem is to set up the communication channel in the integration builder (configuration) for the third party system. The idoc is waitung in XI to transport.
My settings are:
adapter type: idoc
transport protocol: idoc
message protocol: idoc
adapter engine: integration engine
rfc destination: xyz (is working fine)
interface version: sap release 4.0 or higher
port: ??
sap release 46c
My problem is the port. should i set up a port in idx1? But the third party is not an sap system and so i dont have a client.
On the xi i have defined a port in transaction we21 (transactional rfc) for the third party with my rfc destination xyz. But if i enter that port in communication channel i got error messages.
Thanks for any help.

Hi Christian,
yes, you have to mainztain that port in idx1.
First ypi load the rfc-metadata from an SAP referenzsystem and afterwards copy this metadata to the third party port.
For further details check the onlinedocumentation "IDoc Processing with the IDoc Adapter" XI -> runtime -> adapter
Good luck,
Holger

Convrtd to Invterval Part- ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel

Hi all,
I had a table as Interval Partitioned. In order to create XML- Xpath indexes on it, I converted it to Range Partitioned table.
I am able to create the XPATH indexes but I get the error: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
- When I revert the code to Interval Partitioned without the XMLIndex, it works fine(although takes time as no XML Index)
- When I convert table to non partitioned table, create the XML Index, it works fine.
But I need the partitons, so when I create the partitioned table I get the error.
CREATE TABLE INT_PART_TABLE
DB_ID VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
xML_mESSAGE SYS.XMLTYPE,
LOAD_TIMESTAMP TIMESTAMP(6)
XMLTYPE xML_mESSAGE STORE AS BINARY XML
PARTITION BY RANGE (LOAD_TIMESTAMP)
PARTITION MAX VALUES LESS THAN (TIMESTAMP' 2013-06-01 00:00:00')
TABLESPACE CSTR_STG_DATA
NOCOMPRESS
NOCACHE
ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
BEGIN
DBMS_XMLINDEX.dropparameter('Indx_Par');
END;
BEGIN
DBMS_XMLINDEX.REGISTERPARAMETER(
'Indx_Par',
'PATH TABLE Table1
PATHS (INCLUDE ( /abc:field1/xyz:field2
/abc:field1/def:field2
NAMESPACE MAPPING ( xmlns:abc="ABCD"
xmlns:def="DEFG"
xmlns:xyz="XYZA"
end;
create index INDX_XPATHS on "INT_PART_TABLE" (XML_MESSAGE) indextype is xdb.xmlindex
parameters ('PARAM Indx_Par') local;
Now if I execute the following statement in
SELECT T.xML_mESSAGE
FROM INT_PART_TABLE1 T
WHERE XMLEXISTS (
declare namespace abc="ABCD";
declare namespacedef="DEFG";
declare namespace xyz="XYZA";
let $tt as xs:boolean := fn:exists($p/main/id = ("144283","9085802")])
return if ($tt) then true()
else ()'
PASSING T.xML_mESSAGE AS "p");
- Is there any other way of writing this Select statement, which may work?
- Any other thing I need to take care of when defining the table and partitions script so that I don't get this error?

Hi,
I think it's time you give a clear (and working) test case so that we can safely try to reproduce the issue.
What you've given so far has syntax error and name mismatch.
So please :
- database version (SELECT * FROM v$version)
- complete sequence of DLLs
- some sample XML documents (it doesn't have to be the real ones, but at least something realistic)
Thanks in advance.
declare namespace abc="ABCD";
declare namespacedef="DEFG";
declare namespace xyz="XYZA";
let $tt as xs:boolean := fn:exists($p/main/id = ("144283","9085802")])
return if ($tt) then true()
else ()'Why all that stuff? You don't have to return a boolean.
The following works for me on 11.2.0.3 :
SQL> CREATE TABLE int_part_table (
2    db_id          VARCHAR2(10)
3 , xml_message    XMLTYPE
4 , load_timestamp TIMESTAMP
5 )
6 XMLTYPE xml_message STORE AS BINARY XML
7 PARTITION BY RANGE (load_timestamp) (
8    PARTITION MAX VALUES LESS THAN (timestamp '2013-06-01 00:00:00')
9 )
10 NOCOMPRESS
11 NOCACHE
12 ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
Table created
SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>144283</id></main>'), sysdate);
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>9085802</id></main>'), sysdate);
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>1</id></main>'), sysdate);
1 row inserted
SQL> commit;
Commit complete
SQL> create index int_part_table_uix on int_part_table (xml_message)
2 indextype is xdb.xmlindex
3 parameters (
4 'PATH TABLE INT_PART_TABLE_PT
5 PATHS ( INCLUDE ( /main/id ) )')
6 local;
Index created
SQL> SELECT xml_message
2 FROM int_part_table
3 WHERE XMLExists(
4         '/main[id=("144283","9085802")]'
5         PASSING xml_message
6       )
7 ;
XML_MESSAGE
<main>
<id>144283</id>
</main>
<main>
<id>9085802</id>
</main>
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3517234298
| Id | Operation                              | Name                         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                              |     1 |   155 |    34   (6)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | NESTED LOOPS                          |                              |     1 |   155 |    34   (6)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 | VW_SQ_1                      |     1 |    25 |    32   (4)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   3 |    HASH UNIQUE                         |                              |     1 |    47 |         |             |       |       |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN SEMI                     |                              |     1 |    47 |    32   (4)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   5 |      PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     2 |    90 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     2 |    90 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 7 |        INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|   8 |      COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH | XQSEQUENCEFROMXMLTYPE        | 8168 | 16336 |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|* 9 |   TABLE ACCESS BY USER ROWID           | INT_PART_TABLE               |     1 |   130 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - access("SYS_P3"."VALUE"=SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(VALUE(KOKBF$),2,1,0) AND
              SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)=SUBSTRB(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(VALUE(KOKBF$),2,1,0),1,1599))
   6 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
   7 - access("SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
       filter("SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
   9 - filter("ITEM_6"=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"INT_PART_TABLE".ROWID))
Note
   - Unoptimized XML construct detected (enable XMLOptimizationCheck for more information)
SQL> SELECT xml_message
2 FROM int_part_table
3 WHERE XMLExists(
4         '/main[id="144283" or id="9085802"]'
5         PASSING xml_message
6       )
7 ;
XML_MESSAGE
<main>
<id>144283</id>
</main>
<main>
<id>9085802</id>
</main>
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3748936130
| Id | Operation                                | Name                         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                         |                              |     1 |   155 |    11 (10)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | NESTED LOOPS                            |                              |     1 |   155 |    11 (10)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   2 |   VIEW                                   | VW_SQ_1                      |     2 |    50 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   3 |    HASH UNIQUE                           |                              |     2 |   180 |         |             |       |       |
|   4 |     CONCATENATION                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                       |                              |     1 |    90 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   7 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 8 |         TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 9 |          INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
| 10 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 11 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 12 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID | INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
| 13 |      NESTED LOOPS                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
| 14 |       NESTED LOOPS                       |                              |     1 |    90 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
| 15 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 16 |         TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 17 |          INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
| 18 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 19 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 20 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID | INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 21 |   TABLE ACCESS BY USER ROWID             | INT_PART_TABLE               |     1 |   130 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   8 - filter("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='9085802' AND SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1 AND SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='9085802')
   9 - access("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
       filter("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
11 - access("SYS_P5"."RID"="SYS_P3"."RID" AND "SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('0BBD') AND
              "SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"<"SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY")
       filter(SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY")+1=SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY") AND
              TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"SYS_P3"."RID")=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE_PT",0,7,65535,ROWI
              D) AND "SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY"<SYS_ORDERKEY_MAXCHILD("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"))
12 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
16 - filter("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='144283' AND SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1 AND SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='144283' AND
              (LNNVL("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='9085802') OR LNNVL("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') ) OR
              LNNVL(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1) OR LNNVL(SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='9085802')))
17 - access("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
       filter("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
19 - access("SYS_P5"."RID"="SYS_P3"."RID" AND "SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('0BBD') AND
              "SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"<"SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY")
       filter(SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY")+1=SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY") AND
              TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"SYS_P3"."RID")=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE_PT",0,7,65535,ROWI
              D) AND "SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY"<SYS_ORDERKEY_MAXCHILD("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"))
20 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
21 - filter("ITEM_2"=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"INT_PART_TABLE".ROWID))I asked in one of your other threads if /main/id was unique per XML document.
If so, you can use a simple function-based index instead of the XMLIndex :
SQL> drop index int_part_table_uix;
Index dropped.
SQL> create index int_part_table_ix1 on int_part_table (
2    xmlcast(
3      xmlquery('/main/id' passing XML_MESSAGE returning content)
4      as varchar2(10)
5    )
6 );
Index created.
SQL> SELECT xml_message
2 FROM int_part_table
3 WHERE XMLCast(
4          XMLQuery('/main/id' PASSING xml_message RETURNING CONTENT)
5          AS VARCHAR2(10)
6        )
7 IN ('144283', '9085802');
XML_MESSAGE
<main>
<id>144283</id>
</main>
<main>
<id>9085802</id>
</main>
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2864653096
| Id | Operation                           | Name               | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                    |                    |     2 |   236 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | INLIST ITERATOR                    |                    |       |       |            |       | |       |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE     |     2 |   236 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | INT_PART_TABLE_IX1 |     2 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access(CAST(EXTRACTVALUE(SYS_MAKEXML(0,"SYS_NC00003$"),'/main/id',null,0,0,524293,1073874944) AS
              varchar2(10)   )='144283' OR CAST(EXTRACTVALUE(SYS_MAKEXML(0,"SYS_NC00003$"),'/main/id',null,0,0,524293,1073874944
              ) AS varchar2(10)   )='9085802')

Error in Receiver Communication Channel in FCC

I have a simple scenario of Proxy to File. I have to just one field in complete row. So my structure is as below : MT_RecordIB -> Records. So my XSD looks like this :
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://XXXl.com/INF31018/SAPSerOrd_DaysIn" targetNamespace="http://hnwl.com/INF31018/SAPSerOrd_DaysIn">
   <xsd:element name="MT_RecordIB" type="DT_RecordIB" />
   <xsd:complexType name="DT_RecordIB">
      <xsd:sequence>
         <xsd:element name="Records" type="xsd:string" />
      </xsd:sequence>
   </xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>
I have used FCC and the parameters are :
Recordset Structure                                  Records
Records.fieldSeparator             'nl'
But I am getting following error in Receiver Communication Channel :
Failed to process message content. Reason: Exception in XML Parser (format problem?):'java.lang.Exception: Message processing failed in XML parser: 'Conversion configuration error: Unknown structure 'ns0:MT_RecordIB' found in document', probably configuration error in file adapter (XML parser error)' (Software version: 3.0.21)
Thanks,
Pankaj Singh

Hey Pankaj,
Your content conversion parameter might be configured improperly.
Refer this blogs
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2007/08/03/file-adapter-receiver--are-we-really-sure-about-the-concepts
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/02/file-receiver-with-content-conversion
Refer the following threads for your problem
[ Unknown structure 'ns0:MT_dbglgtr_FileName' found in document'|Unknown structure 'ns0:MT_dbglgtr_FileName' found in document']
Rgds
Ramesh

Need to use only one sender and receiver communication channel.

Hello Experts.
I have a scenario where in I have to use only one sender and receiver communication channel to push files from different source directories to different receiver directories.
For Eg;
Sender
D://dir1/file1 --->                  E://dir1/File1
F://dir2/file2 ---->                 G://dir2/file2
H://dir3/file3----->                 I://dir3/file3.
Can this be achieved by using pass through scenario?
Please let me know if the requirement is not clear.
Thanks in advance.
Advit Ramesh

Hi Advit,
I think it is possible. You have to use the Advanced Selection for Source file in the sender channel to define multiple files to be picked up. Also, the Dynamic configuration must also be enabled and used in the mapping so you can manipulate the target directory and target file name based on your source files.
For Polling from multiple directories:
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/File+Sender+Adapter+-+Polling+Multiple+Directories
Dynamic Configuration:
Dynamic file name and directory in Receiver File Adapter - summary of possibilities - Process Integration - SCN Wiki

One communication channel with 2 cluster node functioning at the same time

Hi Gurus,
We have PI 7.1 installed in a HA environment, which includes two servers.
server A: ASCSSCSDBERSAAS
server B: ERS + PAS
and we can see a jdbc channel in the communication channel monitoring, and along with the CC there are two cluster ID available,both of which are showing green -- functioning.
now the issue is the process is actually not started because there is no processing details, and when we stop the CC and then start, nothing happens, but there are still 2 green nights, seems very strange.
does any one have such experience and how can make these two nodes work well?
Thanks.

Probably they use an older version of alsa that doesn't have dmix enabled by default.
Have a read through: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_ALSA_Compl … ix%29#dmix
Perhaps it will help.

One Communication Channel for two XML-Structure

Hi to all!
i'm Newbee in XI.
i register one Communication Channel to recieve two different XML-Structure and when i sent second structure there was a Mapping error, because XI waiting for first XML-Structure.
I'd like to ask if there are any additional condition that i must tune up to make it possible or just it's impossible?

Hi,
Please refer below links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/121b053d-0401-0010-539f-f9295efb7bad
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3a913f71-0601-0010-7a83-dfd3208a9a0b
how to find the URL of deployed Web services?
Creating .NET Web service
http://www.15seconds.com/issue/010430.htm
Also refer SOAP Framework to generate the common wsdl for both the messages with single SOAP CC
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/bb/ddb33d2ae46b3be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Thanks
swarup

Error ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel in droppping a table

Good evening,
I am very new on Oracle and I have a problem with some tables. Without any reason, apparently, I can't drop some of my table. Oracle gives me this error:
ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
and then close the connection of the user.
What I should have to do?
It is very important.
Thanks a lot
best regards
Anna Zanetti

Good morning, I still have the same problem, I can't drop a table from my database.
The message is again:
Re: Error ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
The alert log file says:
Fri Nov 17 12:27:31 2006
Errors in file /usr/oracle/admin/oracledb/udump/oracledb_ora_4369.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [0955C61F] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0xC] [] []
and in file oracledb_ora_4369.trc there is:
Exception signal: 11 (SIGSEGV), code: 1 (Address not mapped to object), addr: 0xc, PC: [0x955c61f, 0955C61F]
Registers:
%eax: 0x00000000 %ebx: 0x00012d95 %ecx: 0x58301930
%edx: 0x00000000 %edi: 0x5830d9e8 %esi: 0x00000000
%esp: 0xbfffae1c %ebp: 0xbfffb060 %eip: 0x0955c61f
%efl: 0x00210282
(0x955c61f) movzw 0xc(%eax),%eax(0x955c623) cmp $30,%eax
(0x955c626) jle 0x955c63e
(0x955c628) xor %edx,%edx
(0x955c62a) push %edx
*** 2006-11-17 12:27:31.658
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [0955C61F] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0xC] [] []
Current SQL statement for this session:
drop table fiumiforjoin
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling call entry argument values in hex
location type point (? means dubious value)
08856247 call 0885776A 1 ? 0 ? 1 ? 1 ? 0 ? 0 ?
08290320 call 0885605A 3 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ?
0955C61F signal 08290320 B ? BFFFAAB0 ? BFFFAB30 ?
0955D6BE call 0955C61F 5830F01C ? 0 ? FFFFFFFF ? 0 ?
1 ? 5830F01C ?
08DD1EEB call 0955CC22 BFFFB394 ? 0 ? 0 ? BFFFB348 ?
58EAB2B0 ? C ?
09434EF3 call 08DD1A28 BF2A8C4 ? BFFFC0C0 ?
BFFFC0C0 ? 4 ? B6AB0300 ?
B6ABC2E0 ?
094106E0 call 094326D4 4 ? 0 ? BFFFC0C0 ?
093D7BB5 call 0940FEF8 3 ? E ? BFFFC1F8 ? A4 ?
093D630C call 093D7AC4 BFFFCDF0 ? BFFFCD08 ? 17 ?
1 ? 0 ? A4 ?
08293DE6 call 0850FFFF 5E ? 14 ? BFFFCDEC ?
0A1ED44D call 08293DE6 5E ? 14 ? BFFFCDEC ? 0 ?
08292122 call 0A1ECAE4 BF2A8C0 ? 5E ? BFFFCDEC ? 0 ?
BFFFD6E8 ? BFFFD6E4 ?
0941F190 call 0829193C 0 ? 0 ? BF2A8C0 ? BF83090 ?
F1 ? 0 ?
08293DE6 call 0850FFFF 3C ? 4 ? BFFFEB08 ?
08291238 call 082937A8 3C ? 4 ? BFFFEB08 ? 0 ?
0828F403 call 08291012 3C ? 4 ? BFFFEB08 ?
08274A3D call 0828F39C BFFFEAEC ? 3C ? 4 ?
BFFFEB08 ? B6CC017C ?
B6C1A17C ?
__libc_start_main() call 08274A3D 2 ? BFFFEBA4 ? BFFFEBB0 ? 0 ?
+218 B6C1C898 ? B7600020 ?
Any idea of what I have to do?
Thanks for your help..
Best Regards
Anna Zanetti

Different message structures on one communication channel

Hello,
we've got the situation where on on single communication channel, we will have multiple message structures. We need to discriminate between them and then handle them according to their structure.
All messages have a header section in which the message type is stored. So I've created a dummy structure:
<ns0:dummy>
<header>
    <message_type></message_type>
</header>
</ns0:dummy>
the actual messges will have a different root element, but you can ignore this by using xpath. So, I've created a sender agremeent with this dummy message as the interface. I have a interface determination with conditions:
/*/header/message_type = MT_A
and receiving interface MT_A. Same for MT_B and so forth. There's no interface mapping in between.
The receiving system now has a receiver agreement with MT_A as the interface. This all works. But in the receiver agreement you set up a communication channel where the message is sent to.
But at this point, MT_A was what the original system sended. All we did was figuring out what message type we're dealing with. Now we need to handle this message as MT_A and using a interface mapping, map it to MT_A_New. We cannot do this in the original receiver determination / interface determination combi, sinse this would mean a message mapping from dummy to something, and we need from MT_A -> MT_A_NEW.
Does anyone have thoughts on how to do this?
Thanx in advance!
Greetings, Walter.

Hello All,
thanks for all your input, it gave me quite a few possible directions to look.
we eventually solved our issue by creating a "generic" structure. It contains the header part (which is the same in structure A and B) and both the A body and B body as optional parts.
now we can make a mapping which only operates on the A part and ignores the B part and also one which does the B part.
<root>
<header>
    <MT></MT>
</header>
<MT_A>
</MT_A>
<MT_B>
   </MT_B>
</root>
we can still define which mapping to use based on the header information. It all seems to work.
Thanks again for all your input!
Greetings, Walter.

EOF on communication channel

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for