EP 5 System defining in EP 6

Friends,
I am facing problem in migrating ep 5 content to ep 6.
My first hurdle is how to define the ep 5 system in ep 6.
I have tried several ways but i am ending with same error message
Export objects of type SYSTEM was unsuccessful,
Reason Root Cause: parseSystems(): Failed to get Systems.xml ,null
Please let me how to define ep 5 system in ep6
Connection URL 
 EP5_DRIVER_CONNECTION_URL ?
Database Administrator ID
 For this i have given the database administrator id of oracle which portal was using
Database Administrator Password 
 Password of Database Administrator
Driver Class Name
 com.sap.portals.jdbc.Oracle.OracleDriver
EP 5.0 server Name
 Given the ip address of the ep 5 portal machine
EP 5.0 Serve Port
 j2ee Server running port (2777)
Location of EP 5.0 Styles
 I have uploaded all the zip files which i have downloaded from Styles->Related Tools->style archives.
 What we have to give here?
Location of EP 5.0 System Landscape
 I have copied landscape folder which is availabl in ep5 at the mentioned location to ep6
 and has given the path where it is there.
 I have fetched landscape in ep 5 from :drive:\enterprise portal\tr\system

Location of EP 5.0 User Management
 I have copied all the content from
irj\webinf\plugins\portal\services\usermanagement\data
 and copied to
usr\sap\<system_name>\j2ee\j2ee_00\migration\ume
 This directory structure is not existing in ep 6 i have created.I have given this path
Location of EP 5.0 ZAR Files
I have copied the zar file com.sapportals.pct.comm.fw.zar
 to
usr\sap\<system_name>\j2ee\j2ee_00\migration\zar
 I have given this path
Please help me in resolving this...
regards
Mrutyunjay
Message was edited by: Mrutyunjay Rao Dora
Message was edited by: Mrutyunjay Rao Dora

Hi,
I will try to answer your question in the migration forum.
SAP Enterprise Portal: Migration and Upgrade
Esh

Similar Messages

VC Error: There are no BI systems defined in portal/ no authorization

Hi,
when trying to launch the BI integration wizard on an iview in Visual Composer in the ESA Discovery system I get the follwing error message:
"WARNING 2005: There are no BI systems defined in portal. In order to use BI integration wizard, you must first define at least one BI system based on the BI XMLA, BI ODBO, BI JDBC, or BI SAP Query Connector."
When I click on the "Find data" button in VC I am able to see the names of BI systems in the System drop down box and can search queries and execute them. So the BI must be connected.
I did not change the original configuration of portal or VC.
When trying to launch the MDX editor or SQL editor I get the error message that I am not authorized to do this, but I am logged on as user admin or user j2ee_admin.
Can somebody help me please
Best Regards
Maximilian Lohrer

Question has been sent twice, I close it.

Require a Java API to read Business System defined in SLD

Hi Experts,
Is there any standard java API that provides any methods to retrieve information about the system mentioned in business landscapes. e.g.(name of a system )
In my Web DynPro Application I need to provide a drop down UI that contains names of the Business Systems defined in SLD

Hi,
http://help.sap.com/javadocs/nwce/current/se/com/sap/security/api/umap/system/ISystemLandscapeWrapper.html
try
ISystemLandscapeObject system;
try
 List wrappers = UMFactory.getSystemLandscapeWrappers();
 for (int i = 0;i < wrappers.size(); i++)
 ISystemLandscapeWrapper e = (ISystemLandscapeWrapper) wrappers.get(i);
 system = e.getSystemByUniqueKey("CN");
 if(system == null)
 system = e.getSystemByAlias("CN");
 else
 break;
}catch(Exception e)
// handle the exception
Regards
Ayyapparaj

Role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS'

hi
in RWB integration engine status is red in detail it is showing.
'No role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS'.
how can i fix this.
regards,
krushi

HI
Runtime Workbench - Integration Engine
Are the Roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and the SLD Consistent?
//***The role of a business system is defined centrally in the SLD. However, you can overwrite this setting locally in the table SXMS_CONF_ITEMS.
This test checks whether the role descriptions are consistent. If not, the locally defined role is used at runtime.
extract taken from this thread
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/a5/1b5342d8a7be30e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Message was edited by:
Anusha Ramsiva

No role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS

Hi Experts.
I have the following problem. We were set up the XI in our company and now we are trying to configure and run it propertly. We had some problems so far and now there is the next one: I configured the simple scenario FILE-XI-FILE but it doesn't work :(. Every step from the scenario was completed successfully (after some problems) but when I have started runtime Workbench (RWB) in order to monitor the functionality of XI and I choosed Component Monitoring | Components | Integration Server | Integration Engine GPI I see that I have an error in Self-Test Status | Are roles in SXML_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent? In detail it's No role for business system defined in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS. My business and technical systems look to be well configured but now I'm hopeless because I can't find nothing more specific about SXMS_CONF_ITEMS table. I tried some notes and threads from the forum but nothing helped me after all. So please help if someone has an experience with something similar. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks
Ondrej

Hi,
The role of a business system is defined centrally in the SLD. However, you can overwrite this setting locally in the table SXMS_CONF_ITEMS.
This test checks whether the role descriptions are consistent. If not, the locally defined role is used at runtime.
Check in transaction SXMB_ADM -> integration engine configuration a parameter (Corresponding Integ. Server) if all parameters are correct n not lost.
refer : http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a5/1b5342d8a7be30e10000000a155106/content.htm
Runtime Workbench - Integration Engine
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/70/58b43be7492354e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards
Aashish Sinha
PS : reward points if helpful

How do we import business systems defined in the SLD to IB:configuration...

how do we import business systems defined in the SLD to IB:configuration...

hi,
go to Scenario tab, Object -> New , Select the configuration scenario enter the configuration scenario name then save.
Expand Service without party ->Select the business system and right click click on next, next select your business systemd.
IF business system not appeared in ID..go to Environment -> Clear SLD data cache.
again try to assign the business system.
Regards,
Venu.

How to delete system-defined attributes (e.g. author...)?

As title.
I can't find any ways to delete those system defined attributes like author, description and etc.
Thanks.

Thanks for your quick response. Which tool (iTunes?) would you recommend to use on the PC (Windows 7) to select the photos I want to delete?

Cisco Prime 2.0 - System-Defined Jobs keep running

Hi PI Experts,
The following two jobs keep running for two weeks. Is it normal?
They are under Job Dashboard -> System-Defined.
Not sure what are they for. Cannot find them with google.
Is there any way to stop them from running if it's not normal?
SAM_Poller_22_15_GETVPNPoller_-253935627
PollerJob
In-Progress
Running
2014-02-13 12:12
SAM_Poller_22_15_GETVPNPoller_961682338
PollerJob
In-Progress
Running
2014-02-11 12:10
Thanks
Cedar

My 2.0 box has 4 SAM_Poller Jobs all of which have a Last Run status of Success
SAM_Poller_700_15_CPU_622922702
SAM_Poller_700_15_DVAVAILABILITY_2064595572
SAM_Poller_700_15_ENVTEMP_-477657161
SAM_Poller_700_15_MEMORY_-1199548056
The names of mine indicate Memory, Envmonitoring, CPU and Availability-
By the looks of the names on your two processes that aren't finishing it appears they have something to do with VPN.
This raises the question: are you monitoring any devices that are VPN capable? If no, perhaps you could disable that functionality on the monitored device...

System defined infoobject 0MATERIAL is edited

One of the system defined infoobject 0Material has been edited , after which it's not responding at all to any other info providers or Datasources .
For e.g. when this 0MATERIAL is being "inserted as a infoprovider" , after creating a datasource its corresponding transformation or DTP is not getting created in the infoprovider space.
Can I install the 0material info object from any other instances as installing from business content is throwing error.
Could someone please guide , how can I get back the info object with original settings and configuration without affecting its master data
It's bit urgent, quick reply would be much appreciated.
Many Thanks
Regards
Deblina

Hi Deblina,
Is 0MATERIAL not in active form in your system?
If not then, try repairing it with RSRV. If there is a problem with data available in it then try adjust all 0MATERIAL master tables with SE14. Better delete data and reload.
If this is about transformation and DTP not getting crerated then...it's not becasue of reason that you have inserted this as infoprovider.
Make sure that both your target (IO) and Source (Datasource) are active in system and then try create transformation and DTP. It should work.
Regards,
Gaurav

What is system defination

may i know wht is the system defination and where exactly it is used in the EP and what all types of system defination are there in EP.
pls tell me
regards,
Rahul

A system definition or system object is created in the portal under: System Administration, System Configuration, Landscape (right click, create system) The system object can point to a backend SAP system , a webserver etc etc. You essentially configure the connection information in the system object to prevent 'hard-coding' any connection information in individual iViews.
Here are some examples of the type of system you can configure (in EP6 SP18):
EP 5.0 System
HTTP System
JDBC System
SAP system using connection string
SAP system using dedicated application server
SAP system with load balancing
Web Application
Web Application
Web Service System using WSDL URL
Yahoo! System
etc

What is Meter reading validations (System defined & User defined)

Hi Experts,
1 )How to configure Meter Readings (Technical Control Parameters, MR Control, MR Notes etc)
2) what is Meter reading validations (System defined & User defined) and how to configure it.
3) What is Register Relationships,Device Groupings & Device Allocations and how to configure.
Kindly explain with examples.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shabnum

hi,
Meter Validation Steps:
1.     The Validation Process begins with Meter Reading Order Creation when the expected consumption is determined for the meter reading to be recorded for each register. The meter reading status is u201C0u201D or un-entered at this time.
2.     The meter reading is entered via an upload program as part of the batch processing or entered manually.
This result is validated or evaluated against the permitted range of allowable meter reads/consumption for that register. The expected consumption is the basis for determining the range of the minimum and maximum values for the meter reading.
If the result is plausible, or valid, for all registers of the meter, the billing order becomes billable and the contract/installation is passed to billing for further processing. The meter reading status is updated to u201C1u201D or billable.
If the meter reading is validated as implausible, the meter reading result is transferred to the List of Implausibles for further processing (EL70). The status of the meter reading is u201C2u201D or automatically blocked. One or more independent validations can be failed in this validation process.
3.     During processing, the agent can release the meter reading for billing; the status is updated to u201C4u201D, released by clerk. The reading is accepted as measured. The agent can also process the implausible meter reading result using transaction code: EL27 Execute Correct Implausible Meter Reading Results. EL27 is recommended for individual processing.
SAP Easy Access  Utility Industry  Device Management  Meter Reading  Correction of Meter Reading Results  Implausible Results (Transaction EL27)
EL70 is recommended for processing of implausibles for mass processing. It is not on the menu, however, one way to open the screen is:
SAP Easy Access  Utilities  Device Management  Meter Reading  Correction of Meter Reading Results  Implausible Results
Once the screen opens, click on the List button on the application toolbar
4.     The agent may also correct the meter reading. If this corrected read is validated as within range, the status is updated to u201C1u201D, billable.
5.     Alternatively, the reading can be determined to require follow up action and a service order is executed from the IC for re-read. A read status has been configured to support this flagging of the account for follow-up service order processing.
6.     When the service order is returned from the field, the CSR releases corrects, resets or possibly estimates the meter reading depending on the outcome of the service order processing.
7.     The meter reading is then passed to the billing engine for billing execution when the reading is validated as plausible.
-Siva

How to schedule system defined info package in process chain?

Hi
How to schedule the system defined infopackage in process chain?
Regards
Saddy

Hi Saddy,
Hope the following links will give u a clear idea about process chains and clear ur doubts.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/events/sap-teched-03/using%20process%20chains%20in%20sap%20business%20information%20warehouse
Business Intelligence Old Forum (Read Only Archive)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/8f/c08b3baaa59649e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8da0cd90-0201-0010-2d9a-abab69f10045
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/19683495-0501-0010-4381-b31db6ece1e9
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/36693695-0501-0010-698a-a015c6aac9e1
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9936e790-0201-0010-f185-89d0377639db
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3507aa90-0201-0010-6891-d7df8c4722f7
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/263de690-0201-0010-bc9f-b65b3e7ba11c
/people/siegfried.szameitat/blog/2006/02/26/restarting-processchains
****Assign Points if Helpful****
Regards,
Ravikanth.

How to prove it is system defined

Hello guru's,
In Mi03 transaction, if you go and edit the transaction displays material, material description followed by Stock Type, where should I define stock type in IMG settings so that the list will display in the scroll bar. Will anyone guide me. if it is system defined how to prove will anyone guide me.
Full points for the answer.

you can't find it in spro - so you can't customize it via spro
technically you can try to maintain table T064A

System defined Shared memory limits

Hello,
I am in a situation where I want to determine the system defined shared memory limits in a process on Solaris 7.
Is there a system call or a library function which can serve this information on the system?
I want to avoid using system() function or popen().

Your problem seemed reasonable. What were you doing wrong?
Darren

What is the Best Approach for System Defined Fields and Default values

Hi ,
Please let me know that what can be the best approach for providing a Default value for the System defined fields when creating a User and How can we hide the System defined fields at the time of User creation

You cannot provide default values for any attributes defined in the FormMetaData.xml file. You can only provide default values for fields defined in the User Defined Fields and supply a default value.
You can using entity adapters to populate some of the values, but you must supply an Organization because there is an entity adapter that you cannot modify that verifies the organization name.
-Kevin

Content Enrichment - Updating System Defined Managed Properties (Author, Department)

Hi
I've been running into a couple of oddities whilst working with the content enrichment web service.   Initially I worked through the sample here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj163982.aspx#SP15ContentEnrich_configure, which shows how to update the "Author" managed property.   In our case this is something we'd like to do but I haven't been able to get this to work at
all with the system defined "Author" managed property.
When we crawl the content everything seems happy enough however we don't get the extra author value "ExampleService" appearing against the "Author" managed property.   I've setup a 'replica' of the "Author" property
"AuthorReplica", which has the same crawled property mappings etc and the enrichment service happily updates the values of this when I run a full crawl.
To further test this I've rebuilt the Search Service as well as also starting up a brand new seperate SharePoint instance.   In all cases I can happily update the "AuthorReplica" managed property but the system defined "Author"
property won't update at all.
I noticed that their is some type of relationship between the "Author" managed property and the "DisplayAuthor" property and I wonder if this could be related.   I also notice with the "Author" managed property, that
it provides an user lookup type box when you display it as a refiner.   Perhaps their is some further processing occuring with this Managed Property further along which knocks out the update I make.
A second oddity that I've noticed has been with the "Department" property.   In our case we have instances where content may cover multiple departments.   To enable this I have updated the "Department" property to
"Allow multiple values".   When I then attempt to update the department property I receive the error: "The item failed due to an error occurring when sending or receiving data to the external content processing enrichment web service."
Again, I've created a replica of the "Department" managed property called "DepartmentReplica" which allows multiple values, and this property happily updates using the same code.
Hopefully this all makes sense.
Regards
Pete

Hi petecuttriss,
my colleague explained to me with quite complicated method, but the summary that i can get is this issue is by design, so the behaviour is expected.
consideration:
if the author property is easily changed, then it may affect other feature that may use that as base point.
explanation:
In this case while the indexing was mapping and being indexed properly based on the defined crawl
property the actual issue was display based and related to how the teaser summary was being defined and displayed based on the query.
By default the body attribute of the Search index-profile has a static fallback summary defined by the internal teaser field. This static fallback summary is what is displayed whenever a query is being performed which
doesn't return any hits over the actual defined body field content(for example a query matching a term in the title or
author of a document). Instead of returning the query context sensitive summary of the body with the highlighted query term, the defined fallback static summary is displayed.
So in this specific use case the dynamic summary based on the managed
property (body in this case) is only being used if the query submitted actually has a hit in the
managed properties content(i.e. the defined body). Otherwise the defined fallback
managed property content is always being used(i.e. the default ‘teaser’
managed property content).
Here are some example query results illustrating this using the two sample docs you provided with the teaser
managed property defined as the fallback hit highlighted summary for body:
Search for "John"(returns both docs with the fallback teaser summary since the query term is not in the body):
20120126-205524-205418a.html
Just got child of eden for the xbox after hearing great reviews about it.
Authors: System Account Date: 2/2/2012 Size: 4KB
http://moss14/Shared Documents/20120126-205524-205418a.html
20120126-205524-205418b.html
BlogPostID:288 BlogAuthor:john.a.evangelista BlogTitle:Check for Alerts BlogBody: Check for Alerts? BlogCategory:BusyBee,2-2 BlogCategoryS:;BusyBee;2-2; PostCategoryR:BusyBee;#2-2 BlogNumComments:0 BlogPublishedDate:7/28/2011 11:37:00 AM BlogModifiedDate:7/28/2011
11:37:00 AM BlogViewCount:10
Authors: System Account Date: 2/2/2012 Size: 3KB
http://moss14/Shared Documents/20120126-205524-205418b.html
Search for "Alerts"(only returns the one blog doc, teaser displayed is based on the body since alerts is contained in the body):
20120126-205524-205418b.html
Check for Alerts?
Authors: System Account Date: 2/2/2012 Size: 3KB
http://moss14/Shared Documents/20120126-205524-205418b.html
Search for "Eden"(only returns the one blog doc, teaser displayed is based on the body since eden is contained in the body):
20120126-205524-205418a.html
Just got child of eden for the xbox after hearing great reviews about it. Update: It is really cool!?
Authors: System Account Date: 2/2/2012 Size: 4KB
http://moss14/Shared Documents/20120126-205524-205418a.html
We can see in these query results when the search term is actually contained in the body content that the teaser returned is based directly on the body content(which is the mapped blogbody content). Otherwise the teaser returned is from the static
hit highlighting summary fallback(literally the ‘teaser’ managed
property).
The problem in this case is that the "teaser" managed
property is internally generated by the indexing pipeline and
doesn't necessarily reflect the contents of crawled properties being mapped to the body field. This difference initially caused the impression that sometimes the default body content was incorrectly being used instead of the mapped BlodyBody content.
The only way to guarantee that the result list teaser summary shown is always going to be based on the body would be to set the body as its own hit highlighting fallback(as is the default case with some properties like ‘title’ for example).
Because body is a very important managed
property and making changes to it (like mapping a crawled
property) and modifying the way the indexing pipeline normally populates it can potentially produce unexpected results. For all content sources which share the body
managed property the decision was made to not modify the body content and to let the indexing pipeline
populate it automatically. From the testing performed it was confirmed that the indexing pipeline was already populating the body using a number of the defined blog crawled properties including BlogBody.
If you wanted to always display the contents of a particular crawled
property as a part of the results list display you can always just create a new
managed property and map those crawled
property contents to it(assuming a mapping did not already exist). Then just display that
managed property as a part of your results.
The only remaining point of potential concern was if not mapping the BlogBody and BlogBodyNoHtml crawled properties to the CrawledPropertiesContent
managed property would prevent them from being used to
populate the body field by the indexing pipeline.
After removing all the blogbody crawled property related mappings to the body and crawledpropertiescontent
managed properties I re-crawled the two blog sample documents I was provided with some spy stages inserted into the indexing pipeline so I could see exactly what was being inserted into the BODY attribute. This is what the body
managed property populates and what is mapped to the default context full-text-index that all the “free text” searches are being performed against.
Regards,
Aries
Microsoft Online Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

EP 5 System defining in EP 6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for