ERP 6 NW 7.0 upgrade to NW 7.01(NW EHP1) + ERP EHP4

is here anyone who has successfully upgraded/updated ERP 6 NW 7.0 with NW EH1 + ERP EHP4 (as sap suggests in guide. I really need only NW EHP1)? There are a lot of questions about this process and sap-EHPI and how to do it, and I need this info from someone who has done this, not some links to notes which i red already some 10 times or pdf guides. I have pretty simple questions and I need direct instructions.
server is ABAP+JAVA with portal.
any help appreciated

Hi
You must apply Netweaver EHP1 for EHP4 ERP, this is a recommendation of sap that you have a lastest patchs and kernel. If not you system could have inconsistenses.
Now, I update my ERP 6.0 to EHP4 with EHP1 for SAP Netweaver.
regards
William Neira

Similar Messages

  • ERP EHP4 causing dump when posting invoice in MIRO

    I originally posted this in the MM forum but was advised to move it here.
    We just implemented ERP EhP4 w/SAPAPPL603 and are now getting a dump when using MIRO to posting a vendor invoice against a PO. The error seems to involve new logic for multiple account assignment introduced with this EHP. The dump is in include LMRMBWF02 of SAPLMRMBM, and indicates that data object S_MCRBPO does not contain component XHISTMA. The lines in LMRMBWF02 are (starting at 772):
    FORM bw_read_co_history_dyn_sub USING event TYPE bwmode
    s_index_mcrbpo TYPE eval_iv_index_key_s
    s_mcrbpo TYPE mcrbitm
    CHANGING s_mcrbco TYPE mcrbco.
    DATA: s_ekbe LIKE ekbe,
    s_ekbz LIKE ekbz,
    s_ekbz_ma TYPE ekbz_ma, "MAA EhP4
    s_ekbe_ma TYPE ekbe_ma, "MAA EhP4
    f_arewr TYPE ekbz-arewr, "MAA EhP4
    f_areww TYPE ekbz-areww. "MAA EhP4
    CASE event.
    WHEN c_recompilation.
    IF s_mcrbco-xunpl = space.
    Not for unplanned account assignments
    IF ( s_mcrbpo-exkbe = 'X' ).
    Read PO history for goods item
    IF s_mcrbpo-xhistma = space. "MAA EhP4
    ...with the last line being the culprit. The actual break in execution occurs at line 119 of SAPLMRMP, BESTELLUNG_BUCHEN where function MRM_BW_PO_HISTORY is called.
    Had some other errors where tables weren't properly activated after the EHP installation, but here most everything seems to be activated properly. The exception is table EKBE, which activates but with warnings about missing enhancement categories of tables or includes/subtypes for four active dependent tables. That's the only lead I've got.
    Can't find any notes or other posts about this error, any ideas would be greatly appreciated!

    Hi,
    the only thing i´ve found is this OSS Note:
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1105679
    Best regards.

  • HA Installation of ERP EHP4 on AIX and DB2

    Dear All,
    I have to do a HA installation of ERP EHP4 system on AIX and DB2. I have followed the standard inst.guide from SAP but I want more information. Can anyone help me in understanding how to go about installing HA in detail. I would be very grateful if anyone can provide me a guide/document of what and how they have done. Can you pls explain me the steps.
    I also have few questions
    1. Shall i do a Central installation or distributed installation ( meaning CI, ASCS and DB in one server failover to other; CI,ASCS on one server and DB running on different server which in case of failure will move to other server)
    2. I know that OS team will do the cluster configuration but is there any other software to be bought for an automatic switchover in case of failures?
    3. Mainly, as a BASIS consultant what is our role in HA configuration?  What file systems should be defined and nfs mounted?
    Request you to take time and answer. Thanks in Advance.
    Lastly, i hope this is the right forum. If not , please let me know.

    Hi,
    >
    > 1. Shall i do a Central installation or distributed installation ( meaning CI, ASCS and DB in one server failover to other; CI,ASCS on one server and DB running on different server which in case of failure will move to other server)
    >
    I think you did not get basic of HA installation. Its neither central nor distributed installation. You need to install CI and Dialog Instance locally on 2 nodes. DB and ASCS instance on the disk that will move across 2 nodes.
    > 2. I know that OS team will do the cluster configuration but is there any other software to be bought for an automatic switchover in case of failures?
    >
    OS team will do file system config so that file system having ASCS and DB should move across 2 nodes. And rest of the file system should be local.
    After installation making cluster movement automatic both OS and SAP Basis guy have to work together.
    > 3. Mainly, as a BASIS consultant what is our role in HA configuration?  What file systems should be defined and nfs mounted?
    >
    I would say primary role in HA installation is of Basis guy. Because he is the person who will decide what approach will you take to install HA either active-active or active-passive. Its you on whom requirement OS guy will work.
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • ERP EhP4 causing dump in MIRO posting

    We just implemented ERP EhP4 w/SAPAPPL603 and are now getting a dump when using MIRO to posting a vendor invoice against a PO. The error seems to involve new logic for multiple account assignment introduced with this EHP.  The dump is in include LMRMBWF02 of SAPLMRMBM, and indicates that data object S_MCRBPO does not contain component XHISTMA.  The lines in LMRMBWF02 are (starting at 772):
    FORM bw_read_co_history_dyn_sub  USING   event  TYPE bwmode
                                     s_index_mcrbpo TYPE eval_iv_index_key_s
                                     s_mcrbpo       TYPE mcrbitm
                            CHANGING s_mcrbco       TYPE mcrbco.
      DATA: s_ekbe LIKE ekbe,
            s_ekbz LIKE ekbz,
            s_ekbz_ma TYPE ekbz_ma,                             "MAA EhP4
            s_ekbe_ma TYPE ekbe_ma,                             "MAA EhP4
            f_arewr TYPE ekbz-arewr,                            "MAA EhP4
            f_areww TYPE ekbz-areww.                            "MAA EhP4
    CASE event.
        WHEN c_recompilation.
          IF s_mcrbco-xunpl = space.
    Not for unplanned account assignments
            IF ( s_mcrbpo-exkbe = 'X' ).
    Read PO history for goods item
              IF s_mcrbpo-xhistma = space.                      "MAA EhP4
    ...with the last line being the culprit.  The actual break in execution occurs at line 119 of SAPLMRMP, BESTELLUNG_BUCHEN where function MRM_BW_PO_HISTORY is called.
    Had some other errors where tables weren't properly activated after the EHP installation, but here most everything seems to be activated properly.  The exception is table EKBE, which activates but with warnings about missing enhancement categories of tables or includes/subtypes for four active dependent tables.  That's the only lead I've got. 
    Can't find any notes or other posts about this error, any ideas would be greatly appreciated!

    Per the recommendation I've moved this thread to the ABAP forum:
    ERP EHP4 causing dump when posting invoice in MIRO

  • ERP Ehp4 / NW Ehp1 error on NET_VALIDATE_USER_PASS phase

    <p>Hi all,
    <p>I upgrade for an EPR 6.0 Ehp3 to Ehp4 level. ABAP configuration phase done. The firsts of step in J2EE phase (INPUT_SAPSERVICESID_PWD_DEPL) the user cheks are ok, but NET_VALIDATE_USER_PASS__ISPD phase have error.
    <p>In the test command:
    <p>net use E:
    127.0.0.1\sapmnt /user:.\SAPService<SID> <SecureField>
    <p>I think, this line have syntax error, because "net use" in any Microsoft systems use "/user:<username>" or "/user:<domain>\<username>" syntax. The ".\<username>" ,like as service parameter, not acceptable by net command.
    <p>"System error 53 has occurred. The network path was not found." from the command line and the ERR log files too.
    <p>// with /user:<username> and /user:<domain>\<username> work fine, user and password is correct
    <p>Somebody have idea how to correct this?
    <p>Thanks
    Imre
    <p><!LOGHEADER[START]/>
    <p><!HELP[Manual modification of the header may cause parsing problem!]/>
    <p><!LOGGINGVERSION[2.0.7.1006]/>
    <p><!NAME[D:\Install\Ehpi_700_IE4\java\log\INPUT_SAPSERVICESID_PWD_DEPL_ISPD_11.LOG]/>
    <p><!PATTERN[INPUT_SAPSERVICESID_PWD_DEPL_ISPD_11.LOG]/>
    <p><!FORMATTER[com.sap.tc.logging.TraceFormatter(%d [%s]: %-100l [%t]: %m)]/>
    <p><!ENCODING[UTF8]/>
    <p><!LOGHEADER[END]/>
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                      com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.initialize(AbstractPhaseType.java:754) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase PREPARE/INIT/INPUT_SAPSERVICESID_PWD_DEPL has been started.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                      com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.initialize(AbstractPhaseType.java:755) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase type is com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypeInputServiceUser.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                   com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.logParameters(AbstractPhaseType.java:409) [Thread[main,5,main]]:   Parameter dialog=SAPServiceSIDPasswordDialog
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]: com.sap.sdt.ucp.dialog.elim.DialogEliminatorContainer.canBeOmitted(DialogEliminatorContainer.java:96) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Dialog eliminator jeeServiceUserEliminator allows to omit dialog SAPServiceSIDPasswordDialog </br>
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]: com.sap.sdt.ucp.dialog.elim.DialogEliminatorContainer.canBeOmitted(DialogEliminatorContainer.java:96) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Dialog eliminator jeeServiceUserPassEliminator allows to omit dialog SAPServiceSIDPasswordDialog </br>
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:              com.sap.sdt.tools.proc.OsProcessController.logProcessInfo(OsProcessController.java:155) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Process ID 4, name net has been started. </br>
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:              com.sap.sdt.tools.proc.OsProcessController.logProcessInfo(OsProcessController.java:157) [Thread[main,5,main]]:  Command line: net use E:
    127.0.0.1\sapmnt /user:.\SAPServiceIE4 <SecureField>
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:              com.sap.sdt.tools.proc.OsProcessController.logProcessInfo(OsProcessController.java:158) [Thread[main,5,main]]:   Standard out: D:\Install\Ehpi_700_IE4\java\log\NET_VALIDATE_USER_PASS__ISPD_02.OUT
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                      com.sap.sdt.tools.proc.OsProcessController.launch(OsProcessController.java:142) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Process ID 4 has been started.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                     com.sap.sdt.tools.proc.OsProcessController.waitFor(OsProcessController.java:198) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Waiting for process ID 4, name net to finish.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                     com.sap.sdt.tools.proc.OsProcessController.waitFor(OsProcessController.java:231) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Process ID 4, name net has been finished, exit code 2.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Error]:                       com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.doExecute(AbstractPhaseType.java:863) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Exception has occurred during the execution of the phase.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Error]:                      com.sap.sdt.util.dialog.CompositeDialog.validateInput(CompositeDialog.java:517) [Thread[main,5,main]]: com.sap.sdt.util.validate.ValidationException
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Error]:                               com.sap.sdt.ucp.dialog.DialogExecutor.execute(DialogExecutor.java:263) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Could not execute dialog SAPServiceSIDPasswordDialog. See previous messages.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase PREPARE/INIT/INPUT_SAPSERVICESID_PWD_DEPL has been completed.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/07/20 16:05:08.
    <p>Jul 20, 2009 4:05:08 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/07/20 16:05:08.
    <p>Ehpi J2EE plugin version: 1.0.5
    <p>System: Windows 2008 with MSSQL 2008
    Edited by: Imre Ihring on Jul 20, 2009 4:50 PM

    <p>I think so, but I only see once the Password request dialog box. Choose  "Repeat phase from point of failure" or "Exit program" option are never endless cycle, not questioning the passwords. Exit and back reset all ABAP phase
    <p>I typed correct passwords. Tested these from command promt, config tool, Visual Admin and JSPM tool.
    <p>These passwords accept by the Ehp installer:
    <p>
    <!LOGHEADER[START]/>
    <!HELP[Manual modification of the header may cause parsing problem!]/>
    <!LOGGINGVERSION[2.0.7.1006]/>
    <!NAME[D:\Install\Ehpi_700_IE4\java\log\USER_PASSWORDS_UPWDS_03.LOG]/>
    <!PATTERN[USER_PASSWORDS_UPWDS_03.LOG]/>
    <!FORMATTER[com.sap.tc.logging.TraceFormatter(%d [%s]: %-100l [%t]: %m)]/>
    <!ENCODING[UTF8]/>
    <!LOGHEADER[END]/>
    Jul 20, 2009 6:39:24 PM [Info]:                      com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.initialize(AbstractPhaseType.java:754) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase PREPARE/INIT/USER_PASSWORDS has been started.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:39:24 PM [Info]:                      com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.initialize(AbstractPhaseType.java:755) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase type is com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.PhaseTypeDataModelInput.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:39:24 PM [Info]:                   com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.logParameters(AbstractPhaseType.java:409) [Thread[main,5,main]]:   Parameter dialog=UserPasswords
    Jul 20, 2009 6:39:24 PM [Info]:      com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.PhaseTypeDataModelInput.checkParameters(PhaseTypeDataModelInput.java:65) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Checking phase parameters dialog.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:39:24 PM [Info]:      com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.PhaseTypeDataModelInput.checkParameters(PhaseTypeDataModelInput.java:71) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase parameters have been checked. All required 1 phase parameters have been set.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:39:24 PM [Info]: com.sap.sdt.ucp.dialog.elim.DialogEliminatorContainer.canBeOmitted(DialogEliminatorContainer.java:101) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Dialog eliminator jeeAdminPassEliminator does not allow to omit dialog UserPasswords
    Jul 20, 2009 6:39:24 PM [Info]: com.sap.sdt.ucp.dialog.elim.DialogEliminatorContainer.canBeOmitted(DialogEliminatorContainer.java:101) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Dialog eliminator jeeSdmPassEliminator does not allow to omit dialog UserPasswords
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:33 PM [Info]:                  com.sap.sdt.util.validate.ValidationProcessor.validate(ValidationProcessor.java:95) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Validatable parameter J2EE/J2EEADMIN/PWD has been validated by validator RequiredFields.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:                  com.sap.sdt.util.validate.ValidationProcessor.validate(ValidationProcessor.java:95) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Validatable parameter J2EE/J2EEADMIN/PWD has been validated by validator J2EEAdministratorPasswordValidator.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:                  com.sap.sdt.util.validate.ValidationProcessor.validate(ValidationProcessor.java:95) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Validatable parameter J2EE/SDM/PWD has been validated by validator RequiredFields.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:                  com.sap.sdt.util.validate.ValidationProcessor.validate(ValidationProcessor.java:95) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Validatable parameter J2EE/SDM/PWD has been validated by validator SDMPasswordValidator.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:        com.sap.sdt.ucp.dialog.elim.SimpleDialogEliminator.shareInput(SimpleDialogEliminator.java:94) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Setting password variable for catalog key JeeAdminPassword into shared input catalog.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:        com.sap.sdt.ucp.dialog.elim.SimpleDialogEliminator.shareInput(SimpleDialogEliminator.java:94) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Setting password variable for catalog key JeeSdmPassword into shared input catalog.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase PREPARE/INIT/USER_PASSWORDS has been completed.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/07/20 18:39:24.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/07/20 18:44:34.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:910) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Duration: 0:05:10.719.
    Jul 20, 2009 6:44:34 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:911) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase status is initial.
    <p> Only \EHPI\java\log\NET_TEST__ISPD_xx.ERR phase failed! " The network connection could not be found. More help is available by typing NET HELPMSG 2250."  and the test command reproduced the error:
    <p> Command line: net use E:
    127.0.0.1\sapmnt /user:.\SAPServiceIE4 <SecureField>
    <p>This working: Command line: net use E:
    127.0.0.1\sapmnt /user:SAPServiceIE4 <SecureField>
    <p>This working: Command line: net use E:
    127.0.0.1\sapmnt /use:WINDOWS_DOMAIN\SAPServiceIE4 <SecureField>
    <p> J2EE_ADMIN and SAPService<SID> user's passwords were saved, because the first connention tests (subphase 1,2,3)were successed... The NET_TEST without ".\" is working too, but ".\" coded inside somewere in jar files.
    <p> Imre
    Edited by: Imre Ihring on Jul 20, 2009 7:14 PM

  • RFC connections in SRM 7.0 = ERP EHP4 system setup

    Hello,
    In SRM 7.0 there is a lot being said about the combination with an ERP EHP4 system. I thought that certain capabilities of SRM <> ERP EHP4 in the area of RFC are not supported anymore. SAP is forcing XI/PI for this.
    When we migrate our R/3 system to EHP4 will we still be able to use the following RFC / iDOC communications?:
    - Purchase Request (R/3 > SRM)
    - Purchase Order (ECS, SRM > R/3)
    - Invoicing (SRM > R/3)
    - Confirmations (SRM <> R/3)
    Anybody has any experience with an EHP4 back-end system? Are there already any plusses for SRM?
    Kind regards,
    Tim

    Hi Rchard,
    SAP promised to release RFC functionalities instead of the current PI obligation for certain new functionality only available on SRM i.c.w. ERP EHP4 with the release of SRM EHP1.
    But what i'm asking is: with an SRM 7.0 (without EHP1, isn't available yet..) can we still utilize RFC for document exchange with R/3 (f.e. Purchase Orders) or does ERP EHP4 require PI?
    Kind regards,
    Tim

  • Upgrade from ERP 6.0 with AFS 6.0 to ERP EHP4 - AFS 6.4

    Dear all,
    I've upgraded our Solution Manager to latest maintenance (all latest release/all latest Sp/all Oss notes)
    I 'm unable to have a queue with EHP4 - Afs 6.4 from Solution Manager
    If I define a system as SAP ERP 6 with Afs, the sol. man. give me the option to upgrade to EHP4 but 'forget' AFS 6.4.
    If I define a system as Afs Server 6, the sol. man doesn't show me the option to upgrade to EHP4.
    Any Idea to exit from this stall condition ?
    If I choose the option SAP ERP 6.0 to upgrade to EHP4, SAPHEPI will ask me the AFS upgrade CD and all AFS Sp ?
    My target is:
    - ERP 6.0 SPS 16 with AFS SP8 + ERP 6 EHP4 SPS 4 with AFS 6.4 SP 2, the max possibile now.
    Thanks tho who will try to help me.
    Regards

    Hi Reena
    Yes, you can upgrade the system to ECC 6 EHP 6 or 7,
    before that is any other SAP system are connected to ECC6 ?
    If it is yes, Kindly refer the SAP Note, & you require to check those SAP version are supported to ECC 6 EHP 7 ?
    1388258 - Version Interoperability within the SAP Business Suite
    BR
    SS

  • Help: Landscape Impacts of ERP EhP4

    I am seeking advice or documents -- we have found conflicting answers on this issue.
    We have:
    - One HR ABAP system running ERP.
    - One Portal Java system executing ESS/MSS Java code, connected to the HR ERP system.
    - One BW ABAP system doing information broadcasting to our Portal.
    Here's my questions:
    - If we upgrade HR's ERP to EhP4, this requires it to upgrade to NetWeaver EhP1.
    - Since HR's ESS/MSS Java code is physically running on our Portal, do we now have to upgrade our Portal to NetWeaver EhP1 to support this?
    - Then, if our Portal upgrades to NetWeaver EhP1, does this force our BW system (using it for information broadcasting) to also upgrade to NetWeaver EhP1?
    Any answers or advice?

    Hi Kristjan,
    you are not forced to update the portal to NetWeaver EHP1 in case you use XSS and update the ECC Server (HR).
    Please read the EHP 4 Master Guide (via http://service.sap.com/instguides).
    Best regards,
    Christian.

  • Asset query execution performance after upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0+EHP4

    Hi,guys
    I am encounted a weird problems about asset query execution performance after upgrade to ECC 6.0.
    Our client had migrated sap system from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We test all transaction code and related stand report and query.
    Everything is working normally except this asset depreciation query report. It is created based on ANLP, ANLZ, ANLA, ANLB, ANLC table; there is also some ABAP code for additional field.
    This report execution costed about 6 minutes in 4.6C system; however it will take 25 minutes in ECC 6.0 with same selection parameter.
    At first, I am trying to find some difference in table index ,structure between 4.6c and ECC 6.0,but there is no difference about it.
    i am wondering why the other query reports is running normally but only this report running with too long time execution dump messages even though we do not make any changes for it.
    your reply is very appreciated
    Regards
    Brian

    Thanks for your replies.
    I check these notes, unfortunately it is different our situation.
    Our situation is all standard asset report and query (sq01) is running normally except this query report.
    I executed se30 for this query (SQ01) at both 4.6C and ECC 6.0.
    I find there is some difference in select sequence logic even though same query without any changes.
    I list there for your reference.
    4.6C
    AQA0FI==========S2============
    Open Cursor ANLP                                    38,702  39,329,356  = 39,329,356      34.6     AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     Opens
    Fetch ANLP                                         292,177  30,378,351  = 30,378,351      26.7    26.7  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    Select Single ANLC                                  15,012  19,965,172  = 19,965,172      17.5    17.5  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    Select Single ANLA                                  13,721  11,754,305  = 11,754,305      10.3    10.3  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    Select Single ANLZ                                   3,753   3,259,308  =  3,259,308       2.9     2.9  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    Select Single ANLB                                   3,753   3,069,119  =  3,069,119       2.7     2.7  AQA0FI==========S2============   DB     OpenS
    ECC 6.0
    Perform FUNKTION_AUSFUEHREN     2     358,620,931          355
    Perform COMMAND_QSUB     1     358,620,062          68
    Call Func. RSAQ_SUBMIT_QUERY_REPORT     1     358,569,656          88
    Program AQIWFI==========S2============     2     358,558,488          1,350
    Select Single ANLA     160,306     75,576,052     =     75,576,052
    Open Cursor ANLP     71,136     42,096,314     =     42,096,314
    Select Single ANLC     71,134     38,799,393     =     38,799,393
    Select Single ANLB     61,888     26,007,721     =     26,007,721
    Select Single ANLZ     61,888     24,072,111     =     24,072,111
    Fetch ANLP     234,524     13,510,646     =     13,510,646
    Close Cursor ANLP     71,136     2,017,654     =     2,017,654
    We can see first open cursor ANLP ,fetch ANLP then select ANLC,ANLA,ANLZ,ANLB at 4.C.
    But it changed to first select ANLA,and open cursor ANLP,then select  ANLC,ANLB,ANLZ,at last fetch ANLP.
    Probably,it is the real reason why it is running long time in ECC 6.0.
    Is there any changes for query selcection logic(table join function) in ECC 6.0.

  • Upgrade straight to PI 7.1 EHP1 possible?

    Hi Experts - We are running PI 7.0 SP12. Can we directly upgrade to PI 7.1 EHP1?
    Or firstly complete move to PI 7.1 and than apply EHP1 separately?
    Thanks for your ideas.
    Mathias,

    Hello,
    Please look this forum
    sap pi 7.1 ehp1
    i hope this help you. The suggestion is this blog /people/sindhu.gangadharan/blog/2009/03/26/sap-enhancement-package-1-for-sap-netweaver-pi-71-now-in-ramp-up
    Regards,
    lpbuff

  • Do we need to Upgrade existing BI 7.0 to EHP1 for BPC 7.0 NW.

    Can BPC 7.0 NW be installed as App Server with EHP1 and then use our existing BI 7.0 as the database.  Or will our BI system need to be upgraded to EHP1?

    Tania,
    There are two basic configurations of BPC NW with regard to BW at customers:
    1. Install BPC on the existing/common Netweaver BW platform (with Ehp1 and at least SP03/05 - depending on version) - this is most common at customers that are either quite aggressive with their application of BW support packages and enhancement packs, or customers who do not have an existing BW installation and are primarily installing BW to support BPC version for Netweaver.
    2. Support two BW instances: One for the datawarehouse and one for BPC version for Netweaver - this is the most common architecture at customers who already have a mature BW installation and who wish to manage BW support pack and enhancement pack application without being constrained by BPC's requirements.
    Another reason we see this type of architecture (#2) is because of incompatibilities between add-ons - for example SEM requires the FINBASIS add-on that is incompatible with Ehp1, so you can't run SEM-BPS/BCS on the same system as BPC version for Netweaver. I hear that technically you can do it by overriding the Ehp1 installer but it is not supported and should not be attempted. The release of Netweaver Ehp2 complicates the matter even further, since it is unclear if BPC is compatible with Ehp2.
    As far as the question of whether it is too much overhead, that is a question that is going to need to be answered on a customer-by-customer basis. It depends on your budget, the maturity of your datawarehouse, your basis and BW management practices, and the maturity of your support organization, among other things.
    If you had a separate BW instance for BPC, then you would still need to load data into that instance directly in order to load to BPC. You would probably want to think of your BW instance for BPC as a datamart separate from you main BW datawarehouse.
    Hope that helps,
    Ethan

  • Upgrading Solman from SP 17 to EHP1 errors with the Kernel install

    I've been trying to upgrade solman to EHP1 but I get errors when I try to install Kernel 7.01. After I have copied the kernel to \SYS\exe\uc\NTAMD64 I can start SAP and for a while it works. Then SAP stops working and both services stop. I've tried to restart the services but I get and error telling me its the wrong product version and to re-install the software. Its a 64bit unicode kernel on windows 2003 64bit and I have the right kernel. Any ideas anyone?

    HI
    I am having the same issues. when upgrading via JSPM or manually, the sap services won't start and keep saying the version is incompatable, and suggested to reinstall.
    Did you manage to get around it?
    Regards
    Kevin

  • Applying NW 7.01 SP6 to  ERP EHP4 SPS5 (NW7.01 SP5) - what do you think?

    Hi
    We have just implemented ERP (ECC) EHP4 SPS5 with NW7.01 SP5.  Unfortunately (for us) we have found some functionality that is delivered in NW7.01 SP6 .  Our next major maintenance period is next year.
    I would like to just apply the NW7.01 SP6 without implementing EHP4 SPS6 for ERP.
    I understand that this would not be consistent with the SP Stack concept but has anyone done something similar or found a note with more information about the interdependencies of NW7.01 and EHP for ERP?
    Thanks in advance.
    Doug

    SAP have confirmed that this is OK if all Basis Components SP6 are applied.

  • XPRA 70401INBICONT in Upgrade to NW EHP1 / BI EHP4

    Hi all,
    we are in an upgrade from NW700 BI-System with FINBASIS an SEM- Addons.
    now we are running into the following error.
    in the BIND_PATCH phase we added the support packages for BI_CONT 704 01-03.
    Now in the XPRA-phase we get en Error:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ XPRA ERRORS and RETURN CODE in SAPR-70401INBICONT.DBW ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2EER7501XStart of the after-import method &3"RS_DTPD_AFTER_IMPORT" for object type(s) &1"DTPD" (&2"Delivery Mode") A2EERSAR 203 Source system "D01155" does not exist A2EERSAR 203 Source system "D01155" does not exist 2EEPU133 Errors occurred during post-handling "RS_AFTER_IMPORT_D" for "DSCS" "L"
    The Source-System/mandant which is mentioned was deleted long time ago, but there is still some information of these deleted systems in the R/3, but i dont know where is can find these information so that it can be corrected.
    Can someone help me to correct it ?
    Regards
    Bjoern Trabes

    Thank you very much, that is the solution ....
    i read so many notes, but this title seems to me to be not the right one, so i didn't read it
    Regards
    Bjoern

  • Any known issues on upgrading SAP Netweaver from 7.0 EHP1 SP5 to SP6

    Hi All,
    Please let me know the implications after upgrading our portal from 7.0 SP19 to SP21 and also Netweaver ABAP stack from BW 7.0 EHP1 SP 5  to 7.0 EHP1 SP6.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sowmya
    Edited by: Sowmya B on Apr 15, 2010 2:27 PM
    Edited by: Sowmya B on Apr 16, 2010 6:44 AM

    Hi Experts,
                     We're in the process of upgrading SAP NW 7.0 EhP1 SP3 to SP10 using Enterprise Portal. I download the all the patches MOPZ  via in Solution Manager System. NW 7.0 EhP1 SP10 Related patches successfully downloaded. But i didnt get
    Enterprise Portal related patches for Example.
    sap.com/CAF-KM.SCA
    sap.com/EP-PSERV.SCA
    sap.com/EP-WDC.SCA
    sap.com/EPBC.SCA
    sap.com/EPBC2.SCA
    sap.com/KMC-BC.SCA
    sap.com/KMC-CM.SCA
    sap.com/KMC-COLL.SCA
    sap.com/LM-PORTAL.SCA
    sap.com/NET-PDK.SCA
    sap.com/RTC.SCA
    sap.com/RTC-STREAM.SCA
    sap.com/SAP-EU.SCA
    sap.com/SAP_BUILDT.SCA
    I serached through SMP,  But I am getting  NW 7.00 releated patches, But our current running pathes NW 7.0 EhP1 SP03 upgrade plan for SP10. Please How to download the Those Patches.  Thanks for All.
    Thanks,
    Selva

Maybe you are looking for

  • New bt vision box cuts off and re boots at least 6...

    Any help would be great othis is matter , as title says my new bt vision black box keeps cutting off wether I'm on free view on demand or recordings its just cuts off and reboots up to 10 times in a 24 hour period it's driving me to the point of thro

  • OAS's application migrates 4.0.8 to the OAS 10G

    I am trying to migrate an application that runs in 4.0.8 to the OAS 10G, and i want to know if you know if some procedure for best practice for do this.

  • Xmonad: noBorders works improperly with smplayer

    I am using this xmonad.hs, which is essentially brisbin33's with a few minor adjustments. The issue I have is that while applications such as Comix work fine "maximized" (i. e. neither borders nor any bars), for both SMplayer and MPlayer only the rig

  • Announce Problem - Can't Create Email

    Back in June in the archives there's a note about how to cure "Couldn't create announcement email. iWeb encountered an error while attempting to locate your default email program". Old Toad suggested that deleting both /Users/me/Library/Caches/com.ap

  • Sender Service for Client Proxy in Receiver Det step ?

    Hello guys : just to check will the sending business system for receiver det step in ,client proxy to file ,will be the name of R/3 Business system (where the client proxy is configured) ? Please confirm Krishna