Error in user account-SU01

Hi,
I am working with SRM5.0. I have observed a problem in accessing an user account. When I try to open the userid in SU01, I get a message:
Internal error - insert in sorted tabl ZADRU
10000000105890000011257INT001AD_DEFAULT
This user is a part of organization structure. Same is the message when I try to open the BP for this user. One change I did was I deleted email address entry from table ADR6 in debugging mode. I suppose since then the problem has arised.
Pls suggest to correct the use account if anybody has come across similar issue?
Thanks & Regards,
Prashant

Hi, Prashant
First find "Person number" and "Address number" from table:USR21S for this user.
Then go to table:ADR6, to find/add this missing entry.
If you are not sure which data should be entered for some unfamiliar field, you canuse a similiar user to compare.
Hope this information is helpful for you.
Rgegards
Lauren

Similar Messages

  • Data Buffer error USER_AUTH_FAILED: User account for logonid "SYSTEM"

    All,  I have the following errors on both the Quality and the Production system in our data buffer job.
    com.sap.security.api.NoSuchUserException: USER_AUTH_FAILED: User account for logonid "SYSTEM" not found!
    These entries will not process because they are generating an error about the loginid for the Username SYSTEM is not found.
    So I am thinking that somehow the MII system is not capturing the correct username when they are being added into the Data Buffer Jobs, or there is something I am overlooking when I set up the databuffering.
    Other entries that were in the data buffer jobs were listed as using the RS1000SVC-QMUSBATCH, RS1630SVC-PMIIBATCH User accounts.  These are the accounts that our scheduled tasks run under.
    Those entries process OK out of the data buffer jobs.
    I did notice a similarity between the data buffer jobs in the quality and production systems as it pertains to the following transactions.
    Production MII ver 12.0.7 (Build 20)
    Muscatine%2FIntegration%2FSAP%2FPROD_CONFIRMED_INPUT_InsertQuery
    Which is called from the MIIC1043_IDOC Message Processing Rule.
    Muscatine%2FIntegration%2FSAP%2FHEADER_InsertQuery
    Which is called from the MIIC1043_Control_Recipe_Download Message Processing Rule.
    Quality MII 12.0.11 (Build 14)
    Muscatine%2FIntegration%2FSAP%2FPROD_CONFIRMED_INPUT_InsertQuery
    Which is called from the MIIC1043_IDOC Message Processing Rule.
    So the commonality is that these transactions are being initaiated by the Message processing rules.
    Are there known issues with data buffering from transactions initiated with Message Processing Rules?
    Is anyone sucessfully using data buffering of transactions called by message processing rules?
    Any help is appreciated.
    Bob

    Jeremy,  Thanks for your reply.
    There doesn't seem to be much detailed information on the use of Catagories with Processing rules in Help or in the forums.  So let me see if I understand your suggestion correctly.
    On the MII server create a processing rule for the message using a category instead of using a transaction,  The message received by the message listener will be placed in a buffer.  I am assuming these messages whould show up in the message monitor and not in the  Data Buffer jobs/entries.
    So in my transaction which normally processes this data I could add logic to access the message data; using the Message Service (Query, Read, Update and Delete) action blocks.  I could pare down the selection by selecting messages based on the MessageCategory that I defined in the message processing rule.   This will allow me to access the stored message data.
    Finally use a scheduled Job to execute the transaction.  The scheduled job would be run with a valid userID and Password so if it connection to the external database failed the enteries would be placed in the data buffer jobs with a valid userID credentials.
    Does this sound like what you had in mind?

  • "Write Error - Limited User Account"

    I get the following message after having worked on a flash
    file for a couple of hours:
    "An error occured while attempting to write to a file. If you
    are logged in with a limited user account, then you may be
    attempting to write into another user's folder which is not
    supported."
    I have a perfectly legit copy of MX Studio 2004 and is
    registered and in good standings at Adobe. I saved my file every 15
    minutes or so. Now, I can't save it, or do a save as either, plus
    the file has vanished. I still actually have it because I have not
    closed Flash, but it will be lost once I shut down. The SWF file is
    still in my file system, but the FLA file has disappeared.
    This has happened to me once before - any idea what's going
    on?
    Thanks!

    sounds like a hard disk error or fragmentation, try saving
    the file under a different name (save as...) in a different
    directory folder.

  • Error Message "User account has been deactivated"

    Hello, I'm having some issues with some users because when they try to sign on into Cisco Jabber or Webex Communicator the next error message is shown "User account has been deactivated". I was checking their Active Directory account and have no issues, everything works fine. If any of these users try to SSO on a different computer the same message appears, so I can discard a problem with the app, maybe we have to check something on the server but I don't know where to start or what can I do to solve and prevent future issues. I'm from technical support but if something has to be checked on the server I can involve the administrator.
    Thanks in advance, I'll be waiting for your answer.

    Hi obimaukenobi,
     just to double check ...
     You are having this problem with only part of your users, am I correct?
     Are you trying to SSO "users with problems" on a computer that works with some users?

  • Try resetting camera error-New user account works

    I went to capture using a Sony DSR-11 in Premiere and got this error. I have recently (over three months ago) have only been using a JVC HD-100 camera in Premiere Pro to capture with no problems. After many tries, I researched Adobe and went through there correction method with multiple steps for correction. In the end, when I created a new user in Windows and logged into the new user, Premiere Pro sees the deck with no problem. I then went by there steps and switched back to my log-in and it fails giving me the same error.
    So this has to be a DV codec, registry type of issue. I tried using Graphedit as mentioned in one of the steps, to find the problem dll but can't locate it. I also did the delete the 1394 device in one of the suggested steps and Windows re-installed the 1394 driver but it did not fix the problem. Any ideas on what/where to look? I would really hate to switch back and forth between user accounts just to capture and I would hate even more to migrate to the new user account. Thanks in advance, Jose Burgos
    www.burgosfx.com

    Windows XP Pro SP3.
    It works when I create a new user so it's not the deck. I somehow have activated another DV capture dll when I installed another software, from what I read from the Adobe help section. Adobe suggest creating a new user and testing. If that works, which it does, then try back in the original and if that does not work, migrate to the new user. I am trying very hard not to migrate.

  • System accounting sa command error converting user accounting stats

    after enabling system accounting (underlying BSD os features) with "sudo accton /var/account/acct", daily attempts to summarize and rotate data into /var/account/savacct and ...usracct fails.  these files were created by /usr/sbin/sa, and later runs of /usr/sbin/sa -s -q fail with an error
    "sa: converting user accounting stats: Inappropriate file type or format"
    "sa: user accounting initialization failed"
    is there some bug  being tracked with /usr/sbin/sa or do I need to file one?

    Above indeed works; file /var/account/acct begins accumulating stats and running 'sa' command shows them.
    The problem is when running 'sa -s -q' daily to roll the individual records into summary count files /var/account/{sav,usr}acct; the first time creates those files and empties the .../acct file but the second and following times fail with the error lines:
    sa: converting user accounting stats: Inappropriate file type or format
    sa: user accounting initialization failed
    After above setup steps you sent, try this:
    sudo -s
    /usr/sbin/sa -s -q
    # observe that the files /var/account/{sav,usr}acct are newly created; now wait a bit and:
    /usr/sbin/sa -s -q
    # observe failure (at least, that's what I get)
    (by the way Linc, thanks for all the digging you've done)

  • RSPLAN - User account not in validity date

    Hallo,
    when I open the TA RSPLAN and jump into the planning modeler, I get the error message "User account not in validity date" in the web-browser.
    I've checked the validity period of my SAP user in the SU01 (... also in the backend of the Netweaver portal) - The date is valid (01.10.2009 - 31.12.9999)! So, why I get this message?
    Thanks in advance...

    Hi,
    If you run the support desk tool, note 937697. It will most likely tell you where the problem is, my guess is that one of the users defined in the JCo destinations of the Web Dynpro Content Administrator are not in validity date in SU01.
    thanks,
    Michael

  • Can't enroll device for user and this user account is not authorized to use Windows Intune.

    Hello,
    We have SCCM 2012 R2 inegrated with intune via an intune subscription. When I enroll a device with my admin account there are no problems, but when I want to add it with another user account which is a member of the Intune users collection, it can't be enrolled.
    When I tested on https://portal.manage.microsoft.com with the credentials of the user I couldn't connect and received the following error: This user account is not authorized to use Windows Intune.
    Do I have to do anything in the https://accounts.manage.microsoft.com as there is a checkbox saying Windows Intune. this is unchecked now for all the users even my own account on which I'm able to enroll a device.
    Or is this a license problem? I know configuration Manager uses licenses for Intune but where can we track how many licenses are used and how many available? Is there some kind of report available?
    I hope someone can help me
    Kind regards,
    Robben

    I added them yesterday and this morning I was still not able to enroll a device with the added user his credentials.
    The UPN is correct. Maybe I need to force the DirSync then? Or will one day of waiting be enough normally?
    I can see the user in the intune management portal. Does this means it has been synced?
    Another thing I noticed is the cloudusersync.log doesn't show them being added? What I was thinking is I first used the all Users collection in the subscription and afterwards I changed it to a specific collection with only the test users. Could it be that
    they all synced already and the log doesn't show them anymore?
    A warning in this log shows this also:
    WARNING: Failed to get lsu url. default release one will be used. exception = System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.~~   at Microsoft.ConfigurationManager.DmpConnector.UserSync.CloudUserUpload..ctor()  
     SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:18    7684 (0x1E04)
    I don't know if that has anything to do with this?
    this is an extract of that log:
    CCloudUserSync::Process - User sync processing thread is now stopping.    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 14:59:42    8144 (0x1FD0)
    SMS_EXECUTIVE started SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC as thread ID 7684 (0x1E04).    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:15    7572 (0x1D94)
    CCloudUserSync::Process - User sync processing has started.    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:15    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user sync ...    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:15    7684 (0x1E04)
    WARNING: Failed to get lsu url. default release one will be used. exception = System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.~~   at Microsoft.ConfigurationManager.DmpConnector.UserSync.CloudUserUpload..ctor()  
     SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:18    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:18    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:02:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:07:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:12:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:17:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Starting user delta sync, raise failure status messages = True    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users from SCCM to be removed from cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Successfully removed users from cloud 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:19    7684 (0x1E04)
    Total received users to add from SCCM = 0, Total Successfully added users to Cloud = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:20    7684 (0x1E04)
    UserDeltaSync:- Users Added = 0, Users Removed = 0    SMS_CLOUD_USERSYNC    23/04/2014 15:22:20    7684 (0x1E04)
    kind regards,
    Robben

  • ESW : User account not in validity date

    hi team,
    i'm trying to log in to the system " HU2" with the id P1047788 and for which i'm getting the error as " User account not in validity date".
    i have already registered again in the page " http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/soareg" using my P-id and the password.
    but, unfortunately i didn't receive any mail communication since 2pm totay.
    could you please help me to activate my account ?
    thanks in advance,
    Alok

    HELLO ALL,
    I am also facing the same problem, can any one helps us out to solve this problem.

  • Creating user accounts with OIDDAS and use them from the OS

    Hi,
    I have a customer that is experiencing an error creating user accounts from OIDDAS, and use that user accounts from the operating system.
    My customer is using OID/OAS4OS 10.1.4.2.0, and that version is not longer available to download, then, I will try in my own environment
    with OID/OAS4OS 10.1.4.3.0.
    And the question is the following: is supported to create user accounts with OIDDAS and expect that users can work with OAS4OS and be
    able to authenticate in the operating system?
    For the reference, SR# 7222351.993:
    Thanks,
    Luis Vivero.
    Edited by: LV in ORCL on Dec 11, 2008 6:47 AM

    Hi Jacco,
    I didn't see your post before.
    Nop, unfortulately I don't have a document with that. I just received that answer
    from development (related to the plugin for AD that is not certified, and DAS is
    not intended to work with OAS4OS).
    Anyway, about the plugin to work with AD, this is working for me; at least I tested
    it by configuring the plugin, I configured synchronization, the mapping file, I did
    the bootstrap, and the accounts that were bootstraped now shows the OS attributes
    on DAS.
    Regards,
    Luis Vivero.

  • Domain user account limit exceeded

    My company is running Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials. I receive the error:
    Domain user accounts limit exceeded
    Alert details: Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials supports a maximum of 25 domain users. If you want to upgrade your server to Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard, please follow the steps in resolution.
    I am aware that the Domain User limit is set to 25. However, we have created, and have less than 25 active domain user accounts. The rest are 'system' users that are either disabled, or active but not real user accounts, and they became active within the system
    themselves; in other words, we have less that 25 real people who have been created an account to use the domain.
    Can someone please tell me what they count? 25 user accounts? Or 25 real, active users?
    If it is 25 accounts in total, then it is slightly unfair as most of the accounts are therefore already taken before we add a single domain user.
    If it is 25 real, active users, why do I receive the error message in the logs?

    Hi William Kirkman,
    à
    The rest are 'system' users that are either disabled, or active but not real user accounts, and they became active within the system themselves.
    I’m a little confused with this sentence. Would you please provide some details of system users and let me
    understand it clearly? Did you mean some Administrator accounts or any other?
    Regarding to how count 25 user accounts, “Any user that appears in the dashboard counts against your total
    of 25.” Robert answered in the following thread. Please refer to.
    Admin
    Account Setup as Part of Wizard Count Against 25 Users?
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu

  • Help needed, M getting this message sandbox environment error no test user account, when downloading any application from iTunes, friend told me to sign out and sign in iTunes it might solve the problem but instead I cannot login I to my itune account.

    Help needed,
    I am getting this message sandbox environment error no test user account, when downloading any application from iTunes, friend told me to sign out and sign in iTunes it might solve the problem , and i triyed it but still  I cannot login I to my itune account. Same message keeping. Popping up,  this problem started supricly today.

    Take a look at the instructions here.
    http://www.technogal.net/2012/03/this-is-not-test-user-account-please.html

  • Redwood User Account error on Job

    Hi All,
    We currently had all our BWP jobs fail with the following error:
    JCS-00503: OS account SYSJCS does not exist or is disabled on BRSAPPRDBWPV2
    JCS-00315: job must run under OS equivalent of Oracle account SYSJCS
    We run our oracle database on a Windows 2003 environment and also our Redwood/SAP servers are on a Windows 2003 server.
    The job itself users "USER" account.
    The only way we could get the jobs to start was by restarting the BWP Redwood services, and this worked fine.
    Also want to state the we had the following issue at the sametime which was flagged up to us in "messages":
    resubmit.update_job:
    ORA-04061: existing state of package body "SYSJCS.CHAIN" has been invalidated
    ORA-04065: not executed, altered or dropped package body "SYSJCS.CHAIN"
    ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called: "SYSJCS.CHAIN"
    All our BWP process chains are executed via the RUN BW CHAIN script, which is copied and renamed for the process chain.
    We have tried to replicate the error in our dev environment but it worked fine. RFC points nothing at all.. Any help would be much appreciated. OSS note has been raised...
    Thank You
    Jazz

    Hi Jazz,
    The SYSJCS.CHAIN package is not used for BI Process Chains, only for CPS Chains. So the invalidation must have come from another source.
    When this error occurs, as long as there are sessions started before the package has been re-validated (state reinitialized), you can continue to run into this error until all sessions have been restarted. The extend of the error depends on the package being reinitialized (how often it is used and the dependencies it has) and the session that needs to call it.
    I think the error may already have been there before you did the chain import and just happened to surface shortly after the import.
    Regarding your other questions:
    1. RSI_IMPORT_BW_CHAINS or RSI_IMPORT_BW_CHAIN_DEFINITIONS:
    the second one is only needed if you want to display the process chain definitions in the web interface before the chain is even running in CPS (in the job monitor you only see the processes that have started); if you do not use that, RSI_IMPORT_BW_CHAINS is enough
    2. How would you go about maintaining BW process chains in Redwood (CPS)?
    This is a question that every customer runs into at some point. First, you currently can not change a process chain definition in the BI system from CPS. Then there are cases where you probably want to leave the process chain structure intact (typically on the deepest level: drop index, do some work, recreate indexes). And there are other cases where it can be useful to bring some logic to CPS (typically on all levels where you have process chain within process chain in BI, ie. on all but the deepest levels).
    For this last case, which is of course the most interesting for CPS, it can be very valuable to recreate the BI "meta-chain" structure in a CPS job chain.
    So here you replace the BI "meta-chain" calling several BI process chains by a Cronacle job chain still calling some of the BI process chains (the ones on the deepest levels).
    Now you can add all the CPS extras for error handling, retries, cross system dependencies, (external) events, alerting, etc. etc. on each and every point in the CPS job chain, so you get a lot more information, intervention and recovery points on your BI process than you would when running the entire thing in one big BI Process Chain (triggered from CPS or not does not matter).
    Typically the customer's decision here mainly depends on the advantages that can be achieved, especially if there are service levels to be met on the reports that need to be delivered from BI and these deadlines tend to get tighter by the month.
    By reducing the total runtime of the process or reducing the number of errors that occur or if they occur, the amount of work to fix it, you can save a lot of time, and thus money.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Anton.

  • Microsoft office is installed on two user accounts. One account works fine, the other account keeps getting an error message. Why wont it work on both accounts?

    Microsoft office is installed on two user accounts. My husbands account works fine, but my account keeps getting an error message every time I try to open up a new document. Why wont it work on both accounts? How do I fix this?

    Hi Aubs,
    Without knowing what the error is, there's not much help we can provide....
    Cheers,
    GB

  • How can I fix the "This is not a test user account, please create a new account in the sandbox environment" error?

    Hi there everyone,
    Recently I tried to make an in-app purchase, I'm not sure whether the app is relevant or not but it was for Tapped Out, however, after trying to make the purchase I received an error message saying "Sign-In Required, tap continue to sign in to check for downloads [Environment: Sandbox]" so I followed the instructions and was then presented with another error message saying "This is not a test user account, please create a new account in the sandbox environment. [Environment: Sandbox]"
    I have been doing a lot of research online trying to find a solution and so far nothing has worked for me, I have also been passing emails backwards and forwards between an Apple Customer Support colleague and are yet to find a working solution.
    Here are a few pieces of information.
    1. I am running iOS 6.1.3 on a 4th Gen iPod, it's relatively new, I got it for Christmas.
    2. My iPod is not, and never has been Jail Broken.
    3. I do not have a test account and have never tried to make my own apps.
    4. I have tried signing out of my Apple ID, resetting my iPod's settings and signing in again.
    5. I have tried resetting my Apple ID password
    6. I have tried restoring my iPod to factory settings.
    If anyone has another suggestion for something I could try it would be greatly appreciated, thanks.

    Yep, I've been reading through other threads on lots of different sites over the last few hours and I can't seem to find a working solution, even though some seem to have worked for other people.
    Most of them hadn't been updated in a while so I made my own post to see if anyone has anything new.

Maybe you are looking for