Excel not calculating correctly.

Using OS 10.5 I am getting incorrect answers using Excel. Switching back to OS 10.4.10 corrects that problem. Since I make my living with my Mac spreadsheets I will curtail my use of OS 10.5. So far I have found no new item worth the change of Excel not working correctly. Numbers gives only about 1% of what I need so don't say to use Numbers instead. I've tried it & used a spreadsheet for a few weeks, but stopped because of how slow Numbers is plus I had to do a lot more work to get it to do a very simple job. This was a sheet set up new in Numbers, not one that started in Excel & was translated.
I've had some minor problems with OS 10.5 that something stopped working, but it was not any of my known running programs. I'm glad that I have OS 10.5 mounted on an external FW800 drive.
Has anyone else had trouble like I have with Excel or with another problem with some program looking like it works, but giving incorrect answers?

Just so I can give clients better advice, can you give a specific example of a calculation that works in Tiger, but fails in Leopard?

Similar Messages

TT89 for MN - Not calculating correctly

Hi,
TT 89 for MN is not calculating correctlty - BSi Message status is as appended below.
2000
NO COMPANY UT EXPERIENCE RATE INFORMATION FOR THE MINNESOTA STATE UT TAX WAS FOU
ND. THIS TAX HAS BEEN CALCULATED USING THE BASE RATE. THIS RESULT MAY OR MAY N
OT BE VALID FOR YOUR COMPANY
Currently we are at TUB 52 ( Version 9.0 ) and i have iconfigured the TT 89 in the Tax Model. Howver TT89 is not coming correctly. ( T5UTX value is .005 ) .
With Regards,
Abhishek

Hello,
Please check T5UTI for tax type 89 unemployment note down the Employer ID. Then with the Employer ID go to the T5UTH table and check if there is an entry there. If not, can you please maintain the T5UTH table with an appropriate entry for Employer ID?
2000
NO COMPANY UT EXPERIENCE RATE INFORMATION FOR THE MINNESOTA STATE UT TAX WAS FOUND. THIS TAX HAS BEEN CALCULATED USING THE BASE RATE. THIS RESULT MAY OR MAY NOT BE VALID FOR YOUR COMPANY
Then this means that you haven't overrided the UT experience rate for MN state for your company 'xxxx' in the appropriate dataset in BSI Server.
Please maintain the Company UT exp rate for NM state in the respective datasets and then run the payroll. This will solve the issue.
Kindly maintain the BTXRATE for it at SAP side as well as BSI Side also
Kindly maintain following in your Tax factory for your dataset --> Group Overrides >Choose your Employee Group > Maintain record for MN.
With regards,
S.Karthik

Calculating Average on a Pivot table- Not calculating correct

Hello All BI Techie's,
I have a requirrement, which is calculating the average out of a column , this column is aggreated by sum in the rpd.
Month Year      Associate Headcount      Involuntary Termination Count (Associates)
2012 / 07      18878.0      55
2012 / 08      18817.0      53
2012 / 09      18770.0      63
Grand Total      18770.0      17
Now, I want calculate a column which gives the average of Associate Headcount, ( 18878+18817+18770)/3 , how I can achieve that?
I tried, using avg(associate headcount), it not returning correct average, any insight?
Please share your ideas.
Thanks,
Bala

Thanks Srini, The tried your solution but still the problem exists.
I have created a new column, called Avg Headcount and entered condition in the column, I am using pivot table.
max(rsum("Workforce Profile Facts"."Associate Headcount"))/max(rsum(1))
Actual Results
Month Year      Associate Headcount      Involuntary Termination Count (Associates)      Avg Headcount
2012 / 07      18878.0      55      18907.8
2012 / 08      18817.0      53      18878.0
Grand Total      18817.0      108      18878.0
Expected results
Month Year      Associate Headcount      Involuntary Termination Count (Associates)      Avg Headcount
2012 / 07      18878.0      55      18878
2012 / 08      18817.0      53      18817
Grand Total      37695.0      108      37695/2 = 18847.5
Eeven my Associate Headcount, pivots grand total was wrong, my instanceconfig.xml already setted to aggregate enabled.

Group Totals Not Calculating Correctly P6 7.0 SP 4.0

Hi there,
For no reason I can tell, my schedule has suddenly started showing Group Totals in my layout that do not add up correctly, although the activity durations are correct.
From past experience this is usually a calendar issue. I am using a Project Calendar, and the Hours per Time Period checkbox to use assigned calendar is ticked. I am using a 11hr / Day, 7 day a week calendar. Upon looking into the Global calendars, a 38hr week calendar is clicked as a default. Could this be causing the issue? I have done some calculations and it appears that some of the totals are being calculated on a 38hr week, but not in every case.
I know the Global calendar issue was a problem in V6.0 but I was under the impression that the Project Calendar would overide in v7.0. is this the case?
Is there something else I may be missing? The only major work that has been done recently is a colleague removed all the WBS Summary activities from the schedule.
Can anyone provide any way forward?
With Regards,

Hi there,
For no reason I can tell, my schedule has suddenly started showing Group Totals in my layout that do not add up correctly, although the activity durations are correct.
From past experience this is usually a calendar issue. I am using a Project Calendar, and the Hours per Time Period checkbox to use assigned calendar is ticked. I am using a 11hr / Day, 7 day a week calendar. Upon looking into the Global calendars, a 38hr week calendar is clicked as a default. Could this be causing the issue? I have done some calculations and it appears that some of the totals are being calculated on a 38hr week, but not in every case.
I know the Global calendar issue was a problem in V6.0 but I was under the impression that the Project Calendar would overide in v7.0. is this the case?
Is there something else I may be missing? The only major work that has been done recently is a colleague removed all the WBS Summary activities from the schedule.
Can anyone provide any way forward?
With Regards,

Nested CASE Statements in my SELECT of Query not calculating correctly

Hi - Am doing simple query to calculate statistics on students per course, the WHERE includes a parameter for Academic Year, so need If Academic Year = x then calculate age in the 1st Sept of that Year, then count number of 19Yrs&Over. Have included my successful lines for sum of other data, in my CASE the calculations are not distinguishing whether age is over or under 19 just counting all. Presume is problem with Date calculation or CASE?? Runs without error..I'm guessing I can nest a CASE?!
Many thanks!
SELECT ......
various fields bought through then
count(p.PERSON_CODE) All_Enrolments,
sum(DECODE(ru.FES_PROGRESS_CODE,'ACT',1,0)) Active,
sum(DECODE(ru.FES_PROGRESS_CODE,'WNS',1,0)) NonStarter,
sum(DECODE(ru.FES_PROGRESS_CODE,'WTH',1,0)) Withdrawn,
sum(DECODE(ru.FES_PROGRESS_CODE,'TRN',1,0)) Transfers,
sum(DECODE(la.completion,'2',1,0)) Completed,
sum(DECODE(la.outcome,'1',1,0)) Achieved,
sum(DECODE(p.sex,'F','1','0')) Female,
sum(DECODE(p.sex,'M','1','0')) Male,
SUM(
CASE
WHEN uio.CALOCC_OCCURRENCE_CODE='04'
THEN
CASE
WHEN ((to_date('01-08-2004','dd-mm-yyyy')-to_date(p.date_of_birth,'dd-mm-yyyy'))/365.25)<'19'
THEN '0'
ELSE '1'
END
WHEN uio.CALOCC_OCCURRENCE_CODE='05'
THEN
CASE
WHEN ((to_date('01-08-2005','dd-mm-yyyy')-to_date(p.date_of_birth,'dd-mm-yyyy'))/365.25)<'19'
THEN '0'
ELSE '1'
END
WHEN uio.CALOCC_OCCURRENCE_CODE='03'
THEN
CASE
WHEN ((to_date('01-08-2003','dd-mm-yyyy')-to_date(p.date_of_birth,'dd-mm-yyyy'))/365.25)<'19'
THEN '0'
ELSE '1'
END
ELSE '0'
END ) Over19sInc19
FROM .......

you can use this formula to check on the age:
TRUNC(MONTHS_BETWEEN(to_date('01-08-2004','dd-mm-yyyy'),to_date(p.date_of_birth,'dd-mm-yyyy'))/12)hope this helps.

PLEASE HELP - Subtraction not calculating correctly

Post Author: hollyschulz
CA Forum: Formula
This formula I have seems to work any other time, but this one batch I am reporting on doesn't work properly:
(distinctcount({CHART.CHART_ID}))-(distinctcount({@nc})){@nc} = if ({CHART.SUSPEND_CODE} <> "GC") then 1
The results for {@nc} is 0 in the report, the result for (distinctcount({CHART.CHART_ID})) is 41. How come this result of (distinctcount({CHART.CHART_ID}))-(distinctcount({@nc})) is 40 in the report?? (41-0 should = 41 but crystal has 41-0 = 40)
I tried adding a +1 to the end of the formula and pulling data from a different batch, but the results were 1 too much.

Post Author: V361
CA Forum: Formula
Hi, Sometimes I will break the formula on purpose, save it any way and run, then when the error pops up, it will show the values in the formula editor. (in CR XI anyway) try this formula..
(distinctcount({CHART.CHART_ID}))-(distinctcount({@nc})){@nc} = if ({CHART.SUSPEND_CODE} <> "GC") then 1 / 0
This will cause the formula to fail, but hopefully you will be able to see the value of {@nc} during the calculation. Also, try adding this to the details section and manually count.
If that does not help, could you give some sample data.

JEXS not calculating correctly

Hi Gurus,
IN MM pricing i have defined sub total 1 and given JEXS condition to caluclate the tax on the sub total 1,but it is calulating on the whole amount,i.e value after those also considering for tax calculation.
Why the system is not calulating fromn the step i have defined,
In TAXINN against BASB 362 is defined
Kindly guide where i am doing mistake.

Just so I can give clients better advice, can you give a specific example of a calculation that works in Tiger, but fails in Leopard?

SNP Planned order start and end dates are not calculated correctly

Hello SNP Guru's
The SNP planned orders generated after the Heuristics run, have a start and end date based on the Activity Duration (Fixed), while the resource consumption is based on the Bucket Consumption (Variable), which is correct.
The Activity Duration (Fixed) is based on the BOM Base Quantity. So if the Activity Duration = 1 day, and if the order quantity is more than a day, the start and end dates, still shows as 1 day. So no matter what is the order quantity, the start and end dates is always = 1 day.
Does anyone have any experience in implementing any code to change the start and end dates on SNP Planned Order?
Seems like it should work as standard.
Am i missing something?
Thanks,
Mangesh

Dear Mangesh,
SNP is a infinite planning tool. If you have defined fixed duration to be 1 DAY in the activity, no matter how many quantity you input for your planned order, the order will last for one day. If the resourced is overloaded, you then run capacity levelling to
banlance the capacity. What your expected beahavior happens in PPDS planning.
Claire

Exchange Rate amount is not calculating correctly in iProcurement

Hi All,
The exchange rate is mismatching when i create a requisition in the iProcurement (11.5.10.2 version).Please find the below test case and suggest me accrodingly.
Example: on 06-May-09 and 07-May-09 i have create a requisition in the iProcurement with the currency as BHD (Note: Our functional currency is USD). The exchange rate is defined from USD to BHD is .377 and this rate is fixed for the entire month.
The requisition created in the following manner:
Requisition created in 06-May-09:
=======================
Line #1 120 BHD---the exchange rate amount in USD is 318.22
Line#2 20BHD---the exchange rate amount in USD is 53.04
=========
Total : 371.25
Requisition Created in 07-May-09:
====================
Line #1 120 BHD---the exchange rate amount in USD is 318.30
Line #2 20BHD---the exchange rate amount in USD is 53.05
============
Total: 371.35
Form the above test cases can any one help me why the requisition amount is slightly chagned from 371.25 to 371.35 even though we are using the same conversion rate (.377)..plz help ASAP , this is an very urgent for ME.
Regards,
Kevin.
Edited by: kevin329 on May 7, 2009 4:53 AM

hi
check whether you have maintained the exchange rate settings also check whether price is maintained

Pennsylvania Local Service Tax Not Calculating correctly

I received a TUB for a local service tax area that is going from a $10 tax to a $52 LST( tax type 084). When I review the BSI interface/ script , I see an additional tax code of a 9 which means to substitute the lump sum for the pro-rated LST amount which is for authorities that have a $10 or less tax.
The LST is showing up as a lump sum of $52 for /484. In PA the LST is prorated per pay period of $2 per pay period. I need to remove the Additional Tax Code. Once I do this, the tax will calculate as it should in the amount of $2.00.
Please advise how to remove this additional tax code of 9. I am referencing TUB # 179.
Thanks,

Tax Authority - East Petersburg Borough (PAKV). Tax Type 84, Local Service Tax. When I maintain PAKV on the IT 0207 record it calculates the local withholding.
I am testing TUB # 205. This particular tax authority is adopting local service tax (84) instead of OPT (51). Effective immediately.
When we first loaded the TUB and I ran payroll for an employee, the tax area was not pulling in the payroll results. I did the steps I listed in my post and I now get the tax authority pulling in but the $2 bi-weekly deduction is not coming out. I also noticed, the taxable earning is showing $0 thus the tax is showing $0.
Thanks for your response,,,

Tax Not Calculating Correctly

Hi experts.
I have noticed that sometimes, on some lines on a sales order, the tax is incorrect. For example the line total is 17.96 the tax at 20% should be 3.59 (3.592) but SAP makes it 3.60
This happens on most orders all the other lines are correct though.
Thanks

Hi
Check the below thread it may helps you
Change of Rounding method on Doc.Settings
With Regards
Balaji Sampath

Usage not calculating correctly. Cannot load apps.

Ipad2. 16Gb. ios7.1.2. Am using under 2Gb on my apps (according) to General: Usage. Says over 13Gb used.
What is is the size of iOS ? Cannot load needed apps.
Have upgraded from ios7.1.1 to. iOS 7.1.2. Have one video. May be just a purchase record as cannot play or delete it.
Cannot use as is. No apps and unbearably slow.. Something is stuck somewhere!
PPlease help. Celia

Thats a typical cause. Itunes sees that there's content on the device associated with another account and wants you to sign into that account on computer. It might be best to set up all devices as new, then sync with itunes, all with same computer, same itunes library, same account name.
Since you're trying to set up several deivices in an enterprise environment, you may want to look into this:
Enterprise/Business/Education
Apple Configurator (multiple device configuration)
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/apple-configurator/id434433123?mt=12
Mobile Device Management
Amtelnet MDM
http://www.amtelnet.com/mdm/mobile-device-management.php
Meraki MDM
http://www.meraki.com/products/systems-manager/
Here's information regarding rolling out iOS devices across an organisation, business or educational establishment:
http://www.apple.com/support/ipad/enterprise/
And here's about bulk app purchasing:
http://www.apple.com/business/vpp/

Wagetype calculation not coming correctly

Hi
Whenever we run a transfer action in between the payroll period wagetypes which we have maintained in 14 Infotype are not calculating correctly.
Ex: Performance pay wagetype is there Amt is Rs 1000 start date 01.04.2008 and end date 31.12.9999. If we run transfer action on 15.04.2008 at the end of the payroll period i.e., 30.04.2008 Payout in this particular wagetype should be 1000 but it is coming as Rs 500
What we have do suggest please
Thanks
Mahantesh

Hi
Amount whatever it is calculating is taking in to account the Loss of pay days is correct.
Problem is when we transfer the employee in between the payroll period while we getting the payout for the period for the earliest record
Ex Employee 1001 holding Postion X from 01.01.2008, on 15.04.2008 transfered to postion Y.
This employee is getting the payout from 15.04.2008 to 30.04.2008 for tht particular month.
Again in the next month from 01.05.2008 to 31.05.2008 he will get the correct payout
whenever we run action in between the payroll period this problem is coming
Thanks

Not getting correct Tax calculation - due to "Ship to party region code"

When we are making Sales order   using (UTXJ cond.)
Origin Country----
IN
Delivering Plant Region----
24
Ship To Party region----
24   (maintained in customer 1 address)
Tax Classification Customer------J
Tax Classification Material----
1
We are getting correct   Tax calculation for tax code AD (4% + 1%)
But when we are using
Origin Country----
IN
Delivering Plant Region     -
24
Ship To Party region----
06     (maintained for customer 2 address)
Tax Classification Customer------ J
Tax Classification Material----
1
We are not getting correct   Tax calculation for same tax code AD (4 %( JIN2) + 1 %( ZIN2)). Instead we are getting only 1%..

difference in tax codes used for sales purpose is just the fact that Ship to party region is different.
Ship To Party region----
24   (up)
Ship To Party region----
06    (Bihar)
For 06 it is not calculating correct values

HS.Exp not calculating in HFM

We have a account calculated through the bus rules. My understanding is that the rules are run when a Calculation or Consolidation is performed in workspace. There have been a few instances where some of the accounts are not calculating correctly/at all. I know the consolidation is run at several levels of review. Any reason why the account (FCF_ConCap_Flow below) wouldn't be calculated correctly? It's a simple calculation -
HS.Exp "A#FCF_ConCap_Flow = A#FCF_ConCap_Ex_Claim - Y#Prior.P#Last.A#FCF_ConCap_Ex_Claim"
HS.Exp "A#FCF_ConCap_Ex_Claim = A#Con_Cap - A#Claims"
** Con_Cap & Claims are part of the account hierarchy
Thanks

Unless I'm reading this wrong... your logic looks flawed
To simplify:
Flow = [ConCapXClaim] - [Prior Year ConCapXClaim]
ConCapXClaim = [ConCap]-[Claims]
By setting claims after Flow uses the claim account, you're going to wind up with a different result:
Start:
ConCapXClaim = 10
Prior Year ConXapXClaim = 5
ConCap = 7
Claims = 5
So
Flow = [10] - [5]
ConCapXClaim = [7] - [5]
At the end:
Flow = 5
ConCapXClaim = 2
Now lets say you calculate again
Flow = [2] - [5]
ConCapXClaim = [7] - [2]
Now Flow = -3
Calculating again will leave the Flow at -3, but you see the issue. You have to calculate twice to get the final results. Depending on your data the intermediate step may look like your calculation didn't work.

Excel not calculating correctly.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for