Excise condition Record Problem
I have Created one excise Record for one tax code (FOR EX :M0) ( T-Code :FV11, key combination : Plant / Vendor / Material ).
Then i went for creating po, If i take that tax code ( M0) only, system has to be those details right....
But it's not happening like that.... If i take different tax code ( FOR EX : M1 ) ( which is not having any condition record )... then also system is picking all the condition.
Why it is happening like this ?
Please give me any suggestion for this.
In standard SAP .... I didn't have Plant/Vendor/Material / Taxcode combination right....
I will explain my problem...
I have created one PO ( for 1000 plant , A material & X vendor ) & i have mainted condtion record for that % BASED CONDITIONS.
There is no problem.
But before closing that po, my user has to raise one more PO with same combination, but duties are different.... i mean to say quality based condition will come in to picture.
Here what i have done is i have changed Valid to date in FV11.... Then in MIRO I couldn't able to get the condition FOR PREVIOUS PO... SO what have to do plz suggest me
Similar Messages
-
I have set a condition record which is by sales org, / division, I would like to know the division which appear in both header level and item level, if header and item have different division, so, the sales org and division will follow by which condition. Thanks!
Hi
I worked on this scenario
Take the example sales org 7777 dist channel 07 Div 00(1 sales area)
and another sales area 7777,07,07
A material say Pen is created for division 07 in MMR
Customer is created for S.A 7777,07,00 say the customer no is 400181
Now you are entering a sales order for the customer 400181
Now the header div is 00
Item Div is 07
Case1
If the item div is ticked in vov8 for your order type this order is not possible because header div and item div are different
Case2
If the item div is not ticked in vov8 for your order type this order is possible provide you have a customer say 400182 in sales area7777,07,07 who is assigned as ship to party to this sold to party 400181
Considering the second being your case in VK11 if you maintain condition record for header division 00 price as rs 10 and Item division 07 price as rs 9 ,system in sales order takes as rs10 only that is header division price
_I feel the pricing conditions will always taken from SOLD TO PARTY hence the doc header division price will only apply_
If you are getting different outcome in testing please keep me posted
Regards
Raja
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Oct 31, 2008 1:20 AM -
Tax code function in TAXINN & Condition record creation
Hi Friends,
We are using TAXINN.
I am talking about Local Pricing procedure.
We maintained condition record for following conditions with the combination of country / Plant / Control code:
Excise (JMOP),
Excise Setoff(JMX1),
Ed.cess (JECP),
ED. Cess set off (JEX10,
SHE. Cess (JECS),
SHE cess set off(JHX1)
While creating condition record we maintained tax code as V1. While making PO even though I entered V2 / V3 / VB values are flowing in taxes tab perfectly. (I maintained other tax codes for the co. code also)
In that case what is the use of tax code & how it will be used in TAXINN & for what purpose.
Coming to Sales tax / VAT Access sequence JST1 to maintain condition record for the existing tables data maintenance will be more. For that reason we thought to add table of classification 3. Through this we can solve VAT Raw material & Capital goods and vatable & non Vatable etc.
Is it OK ? Can we proceed like this ?
Regards
Sai KrishnaHi,
We maintained as follows :
For Excise :
condition record based on Plant / Vendor and for exceptions plant / vendor / Material. This is cenvatable.
For non cenvatable we make branch vendor ( to the main vendor), themn maintained condition record on plant / vendor / material. We issue Po on Branch , payment (IR/ LIV) will be done on main vendor.
For sales / VAT tax:
Made new table with combination of Plant / Country/ Tax code. Then maintained tax code as condition record. In this we cover VAT modavatable / non modavatable for Raw Materials/ Capital Gods / Spare pats ( we diff. G/L accounts.)
We also can maintain Tax code for excise & VAT but tax codes becoming around 300+ considering our scenerio.
What I found from many people in the market no one made NEW condition table & assign it to sequence which normally we do in MM & SD. There are very less options.
Regards
Sai Krishna -
Excise duty 4% diff. while MIRO posting after FV12 condition record change
Hi Gurus,
Iam coming straight to the CRUX of the matter.
Iam working for a client and facing a support problem.
I got an issue that recently Government has reduced excise rate from 14% to 10%
But PO already created with 14%.Later the condition record changed to 10% in FV12.
then only MIGO posted.
while doing MIRO iam getting 4% difference value
why is it so?
Please help me in this regard.
I also attached the screen shot in the link given below
[http://rapidshare.com/files/184718013/MIRO__ED__14_.rtf.html]
Regards,
AnbuHI
Check your PO creation date and condition record validity date (FV12) an MIRO posting date.
Thank You -
Tax Condition record automatically created after Excise Invoice creation
Hello,
Excise Document for the export has been created in the J1iin then in the back ground the condition record for the ja1x has been created with key combination reference doc( Delivery no)/ item no.
Please help to know, which configuration setting causes this condition record creation and can we avoid this..
regards
SBMoved from SAP ERP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD) to Internationalization and Unicode. Please post all your CIN related queries here.
Coming to the issue, in normal circumstances, this will never happen unless some exit is triggering. Check whether J_1I7_USEREXIT_EXCISE_BEF_SAVE is validating like that
G. Lakshmipathi -
STO Problem - Condition record missing
Hi,
I am facing the following issue while creating P.O
I have mentined a pricing procedure with condition Pi01 ( for moving average price ), ZMRP ( which is maintained in SD. condition records are filled ) and ZSTO which for calculating excise and is based on ZMRP.
Condition record of ZSTO is filled in the MM side.
Now, when I try to make a P.O. by ME21, I get the error message that " mandatory Condition ZSTO is missing". I have analysed the ZSTO access sequence. It OK and maintained.
The Error Message No. is V.1801.
As a result of the above issue, the excise is not flowing in the order when doing goods transfer from Plant.
Thanks & regards,
KVinodHi,
My main issue is that in the P.O, which I am creating by ME21N, I am getting an error message that "Condition Type ZSTO's records are missing" . Even though its record is maintained in the correct combination. The access sequence is correct. It is assigned at the right place in STO pricing procedure.
To elaborate further on this, in my STO pricing procedure, I am using condition type P101( for moving average price), ZMRP ( which is the MRP of the item and maintained in SD by VK11), Freight condition and condition type ZSTO . ZSTO is maintained in the MM side.and is calcuIated as 4% of ZMRP. I am getting all the condition while doing ME21N, except ZSTO.
Pl give me solution, why I am not getting the ZSTO condition record in ME21N.
Thx & regards,
KVinod -
Problem Cross Selling - No condition record to find but material shows up
Hi!
I have a problem with one material which always pops up in the sales order - cross selling list but I cannot see the condition record (VB43). I do not want this material in the cross selling list, but how do I get it out?
Any advise would be appreciated.
Thanks,
StefanHi Stefan,
please check note 869601:
1. Question: What options are there to create a Cross-Selling
relationship between two or more materials?
The SAP standard system provides two options:
- Create a condition record using Transaction VB41.
- Start the analysis run (report SDCRSL01) using Transaction
SDVK. The companion sales analysis statistically determines a
list with the double combinations of materials that are most
common. You must specify the specified identifier as an
attribute of the SD_DPP_CROSS_SELLING function module in the
access sequence of the product proposal schema in Customizing.
hope this helps! -
TAXINN SD For Excise Duty where to maintain TAX CODE in condition record?
is Tax code necessary for excise determination in TAXINN in SD Scenario? While maintaining condition record ( JEXP) for Excise access sequence JEXC doesnu2019t has Tax Code field Whereas for Sale Tax determination ( JCST/JLST) access sequence JLST /CST which has Tax code field . (In TAXINN we create Dummy tax code (blank))
is it true whatever I have written ? If yes then what is use of tax code where it triggers in FI Posting? Why we use only for Sale Tax not for Excise duty?
If u go to SAP Std condition type & access sequence provide for CIN in SD (TAXINN) While maintaining condition record ( JEXP) for Excise. Access sequence JEXC doesnu2019t has Tax Code field . do u think we should modify that create field for Tax code ..... Pl check in system & answer the question .......I hope u understand what i want to ask.Hi,
As per my knowledge, Excise is not Tax its a Duty....
Excise gets added to your base price and the tax is calculated on the whole amount and not only the basic price.
Say if u r manufacturing a material and u r under excise regulations, then without paying excise duty you can't move the goods out of your premises, Here even before you sell the material to a customer the excise duty is paid from you. But when u will be selling the material to a customer, the customer is charged the excise duty which gets added to the net value and then the sales tax is calculated.
If u see a sale order condition tab page, there are two fields
1. Net Value 2. Tax
Net value is the value which includes the excise duty and the tax is only the CST/LST/VAT.
Regards -
Problem in Condition record Creation
I am creating condition record in ML51
My amount is 95.20 INR
System is issues the error message Input must be in the formatHi,
Please check the format assigned to the user ID.
As different ID in same client can have different formats.
You can either ask your Basis consultant to check the format assigned or do it your self throgu T code SU01.
Hope it will help.
Regards, -
Hi all,
I couldnt able to maintain condition record in the key combination of tax classification 003.
For condition type JMOP, i have maintained 8% for V1 tax code. If i maintain 2% for condition type JEC1 and 1% for JSEP, the system is not allowing to maintain 2% and 1%. It allowing 8% only.
Any one suggest me....
Regards,
Mohan.Hi,
It will allows to maintaine single tax code to different condition tpes.
Please check once agian
For condition type JMOP, you can maintain 8% for V1 tax code, 2% for condition type JEC1 and 1% for JSEP.
I hope your entering tax % as per the condition type wise.
Reagrds,
Rama Mohan Bangaru -
Condition Record Updation Problem
Hi
Kindly note that after i maintain a condition in VK11 ,in the sales order item level , when i click on the Update button it does not get effected ,ie the condition is not updated in the line item in the order
Please advice
Regards
AkHi,
As I understood from your question, first time when you create the line item, price was picked correctly. And then when you click on the Update button, if went off. Am I right?
If that's the case, do like this. You'll be able to identify the issue.
First add another line item there with the same material. Then go to LI/ Condition tab. If the price is there, click on the Analysis button. Under that check your condition type. You'll be able to see how the condition record was determined.
Then do the Update button option.
Then again try with the Analysis button option.
You should be able to compare this with your previous findings and identify the cause.
Best regards,
Anupa -
Condition record exists, but has not been set IN JVRD Condition
Dear Expert,
I am facing a problem, when trying to create P.O with Excise and Vat Condition. So i am getting Error like Condition record exists, but has not been set so all duties are Calculated Properly but JVRD condition is not Appearing. when going for analysis so that time i am finding this error.
Thanks You.hi,
Please check that have you maintained Sett-off Conditions for JVRD Condition Types in T-Code: FV11 with respect to your combinations.
Thanks,
Raviteja -
Automatic detrermination of Excise conditions - TAXINN
Dear Friends,,
I have a rrequirement where i need to do Automatic deterrmination of Excise conditions...(TAXINN)..The problem is sometimes the Customer produces CT1 form where he is exempted from Excise....I just eant to do this in the same way where I ahve determined for VAT and CST...
Can you pl guide me reg this....
I will brief you what I have done...In order to Determine VAT and CST ...(TAXINN)
Step1 .FTXP: Defined tax codes
Z1 - CST output Tax
Z2 - VAT out put Tax
Step 2. OVK1:Defined Tax categories as below:
CNTRY SEQ TAX CATEGORY
IN India 1 ZVAT
IN India 2 ZCST
Step 3.OVK3: Defined Customer Tax Classification
ZCST IN A/R CST % 0 Tax exempt Form H
ZCST IN A/R CST % 1 2% CST Form C
ZCST IN A/R CST % 2 12.5 CST
ZVAT IN A/R VAT % 0 Tax exempt Form H
ZVAT IN A/R VAT % 3 12.5% VAT
Step 4:OVK4: Defined Material Tax Classification
ZCST IN A/R CST % 0 Tax exempt
ZCST IN A/R CST % 1 Full tax
ZCST IN A/R CST % 2 4 % CST
ZVAT IN A/R VAT % 0 Tax exempt
ZVAT IN A/R VAT % 1 Full tax
ZVAT IN A/R VAT % 2 4 % VAT
Step 5. Condition Type ZVAT and ZCST is maintained in the pricing procedure with Access sequence - fields(Country/PlntRegion/Region/TaxCl1Cust/TaxCl.Mat) for both ZVAT and ZCST ...and maintained condition records for the same.
This is how I went on with determining VAT and CST....
Thanks
SasiHi Sasi,
1.The thing is sometimes the same customer submits FOrm CT1 when he is buying the material for Exports...in this case he is exempted from Excise..it is independent to region
Try with this
You create different sales document type to sale the material who are ordering for export.
You add document type in your condition table.
You define tax code for that
You define defferent customer Taxclasification in OVK3
Maintain two tax classification in the customer master
Create condition record with the one of the key combination sales document type.
Now if you create sales order with that document type system will take condition record accordingly.
2.My second question is say I have defined two categories ZVAT and ZCST ...so the selection of fields should be same for both ZVAT and ZCST or it should be lioke below:
ZVAT - Country/PlntRegion/Region/TaxCl1Cust/TaxCl.Mat
ZCST - Country/PlntRegion/Region/TaxCl2Cust/TaxCl.Mat ????
If you are using TAXINN you need to have condition records for condition type wise
If you are using TAXINJ only UTXJ will have the access sequence no need for other condition types.
This will be based on the business process it may be same or different.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.
Edited by: Murali Mohan.Tallapaneni on Jul 5, 2008 8:24 AM -
S.Cess without condition records
when i created an excise invoice,S.Cess is triggering evethough I didn't maintain any condition records for the same.I am wondering how come this 2% S.cess is getting captured.I request you all to kindly help me in solving this problem
Regards,
Phani Prasad
Edited by: phanip on Jul 17, 2009 9:32 AMKindly check the Condition Type of S.Cess in the Sales Order by Double Click it.you will get a Tax Code.then go to FTXP with that Tax Code where you will see the Amount of 2 %.
Best regards,
Ankur -
Accruals Condition Record posted late in COPA along with the Settlement
Hi Gurus,
Accruals condition record for 1 item in an Invoice is posted along with the Settlement Credit Note in COPA. While condition records of the other items from the same invoice were posted on the Billing Date itself.
For eg:
Invoice 111 Date 01.03.2011
Items Condition value
1 Z1 100
2 Z1 200
3 Z1 300
COPA Doc No. Value Field Date
001 200 01.03.2011
002 300 01.03.2011
003 100 30.05.2011
30.05.2011 is the date of Rebate Credit Note for the Invoice # 111
I also got that if Posting of Accrual is not done for an Item, Retroactive rebate settlement automatically posts a new document for accrual.
So the question is why the posting of accrual was not done on the Invoice date in the first place?
Edited by: Parth Kulkarni on Jul 1, 2011 4:31 PMHi Suraj,
i too have the same problem, the condition types for Values and quantity in COPA are assigned. The system updates the quantity for the first billing document but not for the subsequent billing documents.
Cost of goods sold and revenue gets updated.
Regards,
Prateek
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi Iam using Flex to display pie chart in my application. Im getting the pie chart in Mozilla firefox but in IE iam getting Http Request Error. Iam giving the code what i wrote. Please find. can anybody help me in this? thanks mxml file <?xml version
-
The screen on my iPhone 4 does not have the same color quality compared with other iPhone 4 and shows horizontal reflections
-
hi I am having a doubt in Idoc in creating Model view. I had made a Z-segment,infotype,message type & in WE82 had assigned the infotype to message type. But when i m craeting am model view I am trying to add ths z message type to model view,its not s
-
Hi All I have this code for search i want search by two items like that either one field is fill or both were filled i tried but not succeed please guide Same type of one more search field need to add declare l_where varchar2(4000); begin if :
-
Secure remote login in scripts
Hello, I stated this same question to also metalink discussion forum, so I'm cross posting a bit here. Sorry about that. I have a following business problem: I have two Solaris servers where in first (DBS-node) I have the database. In the other one (