Export choice for non-compressed clip backup

I'm ripping some of my movie DVDs with songs in them and editing out all the content other than the songs and creating a new "song-only DVD".
If I want to dispose of the original movie DV Streams (to save storage space) and just keep the song clips for a future "greatest hits" song DVD to re-edit in FCP, should I export the individual song clips in "Quicktime Movie" or DV Stream format? Test exports seem to show they are about the same size, would one be better than the other to keep the original quality?
Thanks,
Dave

That's what I originally assumed, but someone I know with a long history in FCP thought DV stream was the way to go. I agree with your take though, that the QT "Conversion" must be adding some additional compression.
The strange thing is that I do essential the same parameters for the export, the display size in QT Pro is 640 x 480 for DV stream and the display size for QuickTime Movie is 720 x 480 and is displayed slightly freakish wide (both say have the same FORMAT info though in the QT Movie Inspector). They both seem to Import back into FCP ok.
Thanks again,
Dave

Similar Messages

  • HT4859 If the SMS messages are not a choice for the data to backup, along with things such as "camera roll" and other apps, does that mean it isn't being backed up?

    I want to backup my text messages but it's not a choice. Does it still backup? Or do I need to figure out how to make it a choice?

    It will still back up.

  • Is iCal best choice for Non-Profit shared calendar?

    Non-profit has need for shared calendar ($$ always an issue). Is a .mac account for each employee really necessary? Multiple users need to be able to access and update the calendar. Any/all thoughts, ideas, suggestions would be appreciated.

    Welcome to Apple Discussions!
    iCal does not lend itself to use by multiple users - dotmac syncing is really only for the individual to maintain calendars across many devices, rather than many users on many devices.
    In my opinion, you'd be best signing up for a Google Calendar account each and then sharing a calendar between you. If you want this to show up on your mac, you can sync using one of the commercially available apps if you need to edit locally - Spanning Sync springs to mind - or to view in iCal by simply subscribing to the Google Calendar.
    You'll be able to get help on all this from the Google forums.
    Good luck!

  • Exporting for non-widescreen TVs

    I exported a video to MPEG2-DVD then burned it onto a DVD. It plays perfectly on my TV. The problem is, my in-laws have an old, non-widescreen TV and the video is cut off around the edges. Is there any way to export specifically for non-widescreen TVs or to play the DVD I already made on their TV without it getting cut off?

    I have CS5 (and I'm not there at the moment) but memory tells me there are two MPEG2-DVD settings... Widescreen and regular... I always use widescreen because my video is HiDef widescreen... I will **guess** that if you select the regular export setting your video will be formatted for a 4:3 TV

  • "Export Movie" exports original, non-trimmed clip! Help!

    Hello everyone. I'm using iMovie '11, and trying to make a series of videos.
    I have taken clips imported from iPhoto, dragged them to create new projects, then used the "clip trimmer" tool to cut off the beginning and ends of the clip.
    So here's the problem. When I "Export using QuickTime" and select MPEG-4 and various settings, I get the video as I edited it.
    However, when I use "Export Movie" and select 720p, the result file uses the entire non-trimmed clip.
    This makes my HD videos unusable. Does anyone know what is going on or how to fix it?
    Thanks for your help!

    Bumping this in the hopes someone has an answer.
    I've tried exporting other video sizes, and it appears this only happens with 720p. This is the size of the original recording, which possibly holds a clue. But I still need it fixed!

  • Is Exporting "None" Compression better than "Uncompressed 10 bit 4:2:2"?

    i am trying to finish my first HD project on FCP. it's a stop-motion film which uses sequences of large jpgs (image size3504 x 2336). I have used the scaling feature in FCP to scale the image to fit into a 1920 x 1080 framing.
    when my sequence settings are "Uncompressed 10 bit 4:2:2", and i export a quicktime with "Uncompressed 10 bit 4:2:2" compression, i get slight blockiness around some of my edges (near pinks, reds, oranges) that do not appear in the original jpegs. I thought "Uncompressed 10 bit 4:2:2 meant i was going to get the best image possible, thats what a professional post facility told me to use.
    In experimenting, When i Choose "None" Compression for my sequence settings, and i exported the quicktime as "None" Compression, the image is much better and does not have the above blockiness.
    Does this make sense?
    Is there an aliasing problem with Uncompressed 10 bit 4:2:2?
    Why does it say "Quality:Medium" when exporting Uncompressed 10 bit 4:2:2 but not give me the option to change that?
    If i have to supply a master quicktime for an HD screening, can it be in "None" compression?
    answers to any of these questions would be much appreciated.
    thanks again,
    aj

    I'm sure someone who has more experience with codecs will be along soon, but I'll take a crack at it for now.
    Using the None option, you're outputting 4:4:4 video, which means there's no color downsampling. When using Uncompressed 4:2:2 the codec is only capable of producing half the color samples of 4:4:4.
    Depending on what your source files were originally sampled it, this could explain why you're seeing the degredation. Only very high end videos cameras capture 4:4:4, however. I'm assuming you used a still camera, and I really couldn't tell you what the color sampling is likely to be.
    But in most regards, Uncompressed 10-bit 4:2:2 should be extremely high quality. There's an excellent site for comparing codecs here:
    http://codecs.onerivermedia.com/ which does report some slight anti-aliasing issues.
    Hopefully someone else can offer a solution.
    Mac Pro 2.66Ghz - 3GBs RAM - X1900XT   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • If exporting images for backup, to reimport into a clean aperture or other program, is it best to use 72 dpi or 300 dpi, or does it matter?

    If exporting images for backup, to reimport into a clean aperture or other program, is it better to use 72 dpi or 300 dpi, or does it matter?  I want the best quality for any future unforeseen use. 

    I am somewhat reluctant to answer your questions after Frank Caggiano's excellent advice, but I really do not like to leave the question open, for there will be many occasions when you will need to export images and to understand how it works.
    But please, follow Frank's advice, right now you do not need to worry about pixels and dpi. That is exactly what I meant, when I suggested to you to make sure you keep a copy of your Aperture Library and to back it up with all your other data, before you erase your disk for a clean reinstall.
    DPI revisited:
    So, is the dpi setting only for exporting to print?
    The dpi settings are necessary to define the size of a digital image, since pixels don't have any dimensions. And since you cannot print or display an image without knowing its width and height, you will need to specify dpi when you are printing or scanning.
    If I leave it at the default 72dpi will there be any problems getting quality prints in the future from jpeg versions exported with that setting?
    Not if you export with the original size - the maximum number of pixels available. That will ensure the maximum print quality.
    The dpi settings are required to export versions; versions are derived from the masters and new image files are computed. When you export masters you get a copy of the original file that already may have a dpi setting.
    If I choose "export masters", will aperture will export my masters just as they are? 
    yes, and  you may add IPICT data if you choose
    Pardon my thick skull--I'm an old dog trying to learn new tricks in this digital world!
    No apologies necessary, we were all beginners once
    Here is another example, maybe that helps a little:
    I exported an image (jpeg) with three different setting: export masters, a version with 72dpi, a version with 300dpi and inspected the files in Graphic Converter:
    The master was exported like this:
    Notice, the master had already dpi settings, although I did not specify any on export.
    The size is 51,48 cm x 38,61 cm.
    The 72 dpi Version has larger dimensions, but also 10 Megapixels.
    and here the 300 dpi version: smaller dimensions, same amount of pixels.

  • Export License Determination for Non R/3 systems

    Hi Experts,
    We have a non-R/3 system from where sales orders are created and sent to GTS for License Determination. We have developed an interface to load required details to create export declarations.
    We would like to determine export license for the documents created in GTS. We have done all the settings required for License Determination but, still not able to determine license automatically.
    Can anyone advise  is it possible to determine license without r/3 feed? If it is possible, what could be the additional check we have to do.
    Thanks,
    Sudheer

    Thanks for your reply..
    The settings which i done was determining license perfectly when the export declaration documents are created with reference to R/3 documents (proforma invoice from R/3.
    I am looking for manually created document only in GTS, how can we determine export license. Is it possible to determine export license?
    Thanks,
    Sudheer.

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 11641: A simple fix - we need to keep track of the display list index for non-clipping masks such as luminosity masks , not just alpha masks.

    Revision: 11641
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-11-10 18:29:57 -0800 (Tue, 10 Nov 2009)
    Log Message:
    A simple fix - we need to keep track of the display list index for non-clipping masks such as luminosity masks, not just alpha masks.
    QE notes: Please include tests for multiple graphic content nodes with masks under a .
    Doc notes: N/A
    Bugs:
    SDK-24133 - Multiple non-Group maskees don't work when using maskType="luminosity"
    Reviewer: Deepa
    Tests run: Checkintests, Bug test case
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24133
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/fxg/FlexFXG2SWFTranscoder.java

    Revision: 11641
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-11-10 18:29:57 -0800 (Tue, 10 Nov 2009)
    Log Message:
    A simple fix - we need to keep track of the display list index for non-clipping masks such as luminosity masks, not just alpha masks.
    QE notes: Please include tests for multiple graphic content nodes with masks under a .
    Doc notes: N/A
    Bugs:
    SDK-24133 - Multiple non-Group maskees don't work when using maskType="luminosity"
    Reviewer: Deepa
    Tests run: Checkintests, Bug test case
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24133
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/fxg/FlexFXG2SWFTranscoder.java

  • Need instructions for downloading a CD in non-compressed file format

    Friends, I have purchased some woo-woo brain wave meditation CD that requires it be downloaded to my ipod in a non-compressed file format -- either .wav or aiff. I have absolutely no idea what that means or how to do it. HELP!!

    Change your import settings to AIFF or WAV and import the CD. Go to Edit>Preferences>Advanced>Importing and from the "import using" menu choose AIFF encoder or WAV encoder: How To Choose Import Settings

  • "Uncompressed 10-bit" vs. "None" Compression settings

    Hello,
    I work at a FX/finishing/color grading facility that provides the final masters for commercials seen on television.
    I am trying to gain some insight on the difference between some compression settings, so that I can educate a client on the proper file to provide us.
    We have been provided Quicktime files with an "Uncompressed 10-bit NTSC" tag attached to it, though they always come with an FCP wrapper that requires a special codec for us to access the files. They are usually relatively smaller files, which also has us suspecting that they are actually compressed.
    We would prefer files with a universal Quicktime codec, such as exporting it with "None" as done in the Quicktime conversion in FCP. Problem being, these files get so huge and unmanageable even when derived from low-end acquisition formats.
    A 5 second clip exported with "Uncompressed 10 bit" comes to are 115megs, while "None" is at 457 megs.
    Can someone explain to me the differences between these codecs and what causes the vast difference in file sizes?

    La diferencia en clara, tú tienes un file uncompressed y otro sin none compresion, paresen igula pero no es así, ambos te dicen sin compresion, pero el none comprsesion es puro, es el file en crudo por esa razon pesa mucho mas, tú tiens que ver que deseas porque ambos se ven bien el resultado en ambos en optimo, ecepto cuando los tienes en FCP y los exportas como DV, ahí se ven la diferencia pues la compresion a DV siempre baja un poco la calidad del producto final.
    El file "none" pesa más del doble que el "uncompressed-8bits"
    mi recomendacion es depende de lo qué quieres y que capacidad de tu HD estas dispusto a ocupar y par qué trabajo usarlo? será el formato que escojas pero ambos son muy buenos..
    pd:puedes contestar en ingles si deseas.. thanks

  • Best image EXPORT settings for best quality

    What should i have my export settings at when exporting to a jump drive to give to clients for web and printing use???
    When i see my images uploaded on Facebook for example, the qulity looks poor which worries me that when printing the quality will be poor as well. Am i missing something in the setting for exporting? What is the proper way to export for the best quality image? HELP!
    My settings now under Aperture>Presets>Image Export:
    JPG Original size
    300 dpi

    t_hall10 wrote:
    The information provided was helpful, but did not completely answer my question...
    Are there specific settings with-in Aperture I can set for exporting so that clients have the ability to print as wanted and post on the web as wanted whithout losing any major amount of photo quality?
    No, not for one size fits all.
    I do appreciate this may be a frustrating answer, but non-the-less, that's how it is.
    t_hall10 wrote:
    Should I be gving 2 folders of pictures, one for web use and one for printing use? If I were to do that, what should the exporting setting be set for both folders?
    Maybe, it's your choice.
    Let's go through the settings.
    The only real quality setting is for JPG compression. 12 is virtually no (lossless) compression but gives huge file sizes which may breach a websites limits.
    A 16MP images on quality 12 will be about 22MB. 11 brings it down to 8MB and 10 down to 7MB. You'd be very hard pressed to see the difference between a 12 and a 10. But if you want to feel you are giving the best quality without the extreme file size, go for 11.
    The the vast majority of web sites, like facebook, will either resize uploaded images and/or re-compress them. They may also crop them to a different aspect ratio to fit their browser software.
    Many report the best size for upload to facebook, for small images is 960 pixels on the long side. For large images it's 2048. For different websites it may be different. It is discussed on many photography sites and blogs. You will find some promoting the 960 / 2048, and others with their own preferences. Here's a good one which also shows you many ways FB will mess with the images:
    http://havecamerawilltravel.com/photographer/images-photos-facebook-sizes-dimens ions-types
    The safest colour space is sRGB (Mac profile: sRGB IEC61966-2.1) as it will more often be right than wrong. You should preview your images on screen with this profile to get a feel for how it will look and avoid unexpected colour shifts in your files. Ideally your screen should be calibrated so you know what you are giving them is accurate.
    To understand the printing issue, try this exercise:
    If you have a printer installed on your Mac, it probably also installed some printer profiles. In Aperture, look at one of your nicer vibrant images. From the view menu turn on 'Onscreen Proofing' and then from the 'Proofing Profile' sub menu, select one of your printer profiles and look at how the onscreen image changes. Repeat with each of the printing profiles and see how the image changes each time.
    This is only a fraction of the colour shifts that will be occuring after you give your file to someone and they print it on their own uncalibrated system with their uncalibrated printer.
    Many photographers don't offer full size images to their clients. They will usually give them smaller versions for their own use, which may include small size printing.
    They will either do the main printing themself on their own calibrated printer, or work with a print shop, and may have installed calibrated profiles on their system for the shops printing equipment so they can use onscreen proofing to gauge what the pictures will look like when printed on that equipment.
    But if you are just giving a file to someone, you lose all control of how they will print it. Even experienced photographers and computer users can struggle to make the prints match close to what they look like on screen.
    Most often photos will appear too dark, or the colours look wrong, or it lacks sharpness. There are some settings on the export presets for gamma and blackpoint compensation. Gamma will brighten the image for when it's printing too dark, and blackpoint will try to stop the shadows turning black (within the chosen colour space). But as you don't know in advance whether the images are going to print too dark, or the shadows are turning black, you can't really set these for a one-size fits all scenario.
    So there are not many settings to help you here.
    You are actually moving into the realm of defining your product. You could, for example, ask the client which site they intend to publish the photos on, research that site and produce files optimized specifically for that site.
    You also need to decide what size (resolution) files to give them for printing and whether you are happy giving away your full size images.
    These choices will lead you to a number of a different files sizes as 'your product', all should be in sRGB colour space, and all with quality 10 or 11. For any client's who know how to make use of a wider clour space like Adobe RGB for printing, they will probably ask you up front to supply the print versions as such.
    Next, for each size and usage, you now need to sharpen these images.
    This is because sharpeing is best applied to images that have been resized to their intended output size and should be sharpened in accordance with how they will be viewed. Images displayed on computer screen generally need less sharpening than those that will be printed. Depening on the printer, the images may need some oversharpening in the file, in order to appear crisp and sharp in the print. As you won't be controlling the printing process you should probably avoid oversharpening. The bottom line is, if people are taking on the task of their own printing, they'll need to figure out what they are doing to get good results, or use a commercial printer.
    Andy

  • Db backup failure with DB13 for whole database offline backup

    Dear experts,
         I found a problem after using DB13 for whole database offline backup,it prompt the following error information :
    BR0143I Backup type: offline_force                                                                               
    BR0130I Backup device type: util_file                                                                               
    BR0109I Files will be saved by backup utility                                                                               
    BR0289I BRARCHIVE will be started at the end of processing                                                                               
    BR0134I Unattended mode with 'force' active - no operator confirmation allowed                                                                               
    BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2008-09-06 22.03.32                                                                               
    BR0307I Shutting down database instance DEV ...                                                                               
    BR0278E Command output of '/sapdev/oracle/DEV/102_64/bin/sqlplus':                                                                               
    SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production on Sat Sep 6 22:03:33 2008                                                                               
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.                                                                               
    SQL> Connected.                                                                               
    SQL> csh: The file access permissions do not allow the specified action.                                                                               
    SQL> ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation                                                                               
    SQL> Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production                                                                               
    With the Partitioning and Data Mining options                                                                               
    BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2008-09-06 23.03.40                                                                               
    BR0279E Return code from '/sapdev/oracle/DEV/102_64/bin/sqlplus': 0                                                                               
    BR0302E SQLPLUS call for database instance DEV failed                                                                               
    BR0309E Shutdown of database instance DEV failed                                                                               
    BR0056I End of database backup: bdythfth.aff 2008-09-06 23.03.40                                                                               
    BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2008-09-06 23.03.40                                                                               
    BR0054I BRBACKUP terminated with errors 
    i have checked the file mode in the directory of sapbackup and it seem no problem.please help me to analyze it,thanks.

    Hi,
    If you are using oracle database than you can take backup using brtools(online or offline). login as user <sid>adm & run brtools command at command prompt.Than you will get a menu driven screen .
    BR*Tools main menu
    1 = Instance management
    2 - Space management
    3 - Segment management
    4 - Backup and database copy
    5 - Restore and recovery
    6 - Check and verification
    7 - Database statistics
    8 - Additional functions
    9 - Exit program
    Standard keys: c - cont, b - back, s - stop, r - refr, h - help
    BR0662I Enter your choice:
    select option 4(Backup & database copy)
    than you get the following screen
    Backup and database copy
    1 = Database backup
    2 - Archivelog backup
    3 - Database copy
    4 - Non-database backup
    5 - Backup of database disk backup
    6 - Verification of database backup
    7 - Verification of archivelog backup
    8 - Additional functions
    9 - Reset program status
    Standard keys: c - cont, b - back, s - stop, r - refr, h - help
    select 8(Additional functions)
    you get the following screen
    Additional functions for backup and copy
    1 = Update of compression rates
    2 - Preparation of RMAN backups
    3 - Deletion of database disk backups
    4 - Deletion of archivelog disk backups
    5 - Controlling of BRARCHIVE run
    6 - Initialization of BRBACKUP tape volumes
    7 - Initialization of BRARCHIVE tape volumes
    Standard keys: c - cont, b - back, s - stop, r - refr, h - help
    select option 6(Initialization of BRBACKUP tape volumes)
    than u get the following screen
    Options for initialization of BRBACKUP tape volumes
    1 - BRBACKUP profile (profile) ....... http://initPRD.sap
    2 - Initialization type (initialize) . rename
    3 ~ Number of volumes (number) ....... []
    4 - Confirmation mode (confirm) ...... yes
    5 - Message language (language) ...... [E]
    6 ~ Tape volume names (volume) ....... PRDB01
    7 - BRBACKUP command line (command) .. http://-p initPRD.sap -i -l E -v PRDB01
    choose option 2 & put force & enter
    than choose 6 give tape name which one you define in init<sid>.sap file
    than press "c"
    press "c" to initialize the tape
    After that go back to main menu
    Backup and database copy
    1 = Database backup
    2 - Archivelog backup
    3 - Database copy
    4 - Non-database backup
    5 - Backup of database disk backup
    6 - Verification of database backup
    7 - Verification of archivelog backup
    8 - Additional functions
    9 - Reset program status
    Standard keys: c - cont, b - back, s - stop, r - refr, h - help
    chose option 1
    BRBACKUP main options for backup and database copy
    1 - BRBACKUP profile (profile) ....... http://initPRD.sap
    2 - Backup device type (device) ...... tape
    3 ~ Tape volumes for backup (volume) . []
    4 # BACKINT/Mount profile (parfile) .. []
    5 - Database user/password (user) .... [/]
    6 - Backup type (type) ............... offline_force
    7 - Disk backup for backup (backup) .. no
    8 # Delete disk backup (delete) ...... no
    9 ~ Files for backup (mode) .......... all
    Standard keys: c - cont, b - back, s - stop, r - refr, h - help
    chose option 3
    give the tape volume name (Ex -PRDB01)
    tahn c & c&c &c backup will start
    Let me know If you have any query related to backup.
    Karan

  • What are the best export settings for a HD video in Premier Pro CS4?

    Hi!
       I've been having so much trouble with this issue and it's something that continually frustrates my boss. I have a HD video the settings for it are
    FPS 23.98
    1920 x 1080, then a few lines down it says 1408 x 792
    16 bit,
    2 channels
    48000 Hz
       What should the settings be when I make a new sequence?
                 When I look at it in the window in Premiere Pro I have to contantly 'shrink' the image to fit the window, is that something I should be doing or does it indicate the sequence settings are incorrect?
    But more importantly what should the export settings be? I exported a 4 minute long video and the size was 1 GB, I know that's too big.
    I need to export it without loosing any quality and export another one that meets the Youtube and Vimeo limits on size.
    Vimeo is 500 MB per week, sometimes I upload 4 videos per week. I think Youtube you can only upload 500 MB at a time.
    I need to get smaller sizes with loosing the least amount of quality possible AND the best export settings for quality, so I guess I have 3 separate questions-
    What are the best sequence settings for HD video?
    What are the best export settings for HD without loosing any quality?
    What are the best export settings for the size to come out around 500 MB with loosing the least amount of quality possible?
    Thank You!
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/713070
    On the above thread I used the 5th anwer, and it's going to take about 7 hours to export a 4 minute video :/

    It Stands for "Coder Decoder."
    Your format is like a container for your video file. Certain containers can hold certain codecs and not others. Other containers can hold other codecs. Sometimes different containers can hold the same codecs.
    This might be a bad analogy but I'll give it a try.
    A coffe cup (container) can hold pretty much any liquid you drink, where a red solo cup (container) won't hold scolding water. So, the coffe cup would be your container of choice most likely because it has the most options for liquids (codecs). But, you might want a red solo cup for just a single crappy beer at a party (a moderate quality streaming video on the web). In that case, you don't need all the optoins of another container.
    In Premiere Pro CC H.264 is a Container and the Codec in one option. This has been streamlined for web distrobution of video to be played in browsers without things like Flash or special players.
    Were as if you choose the QuickTime Container there are over 40 codec optoins (at least on my machine with additinal ones installed) but you may run into an issue where your browser doesn't support QuickTime playback.
    I would say that your container is for compatability with players and your codec is taken into consideration when looking at the quality of the compression.
    Yesteraday I wrote a blog entery on Exporting from Premiere Pro and found that the MPEG-4 codec inside of the QuickTime container gave me much richer colors than the H.264 container/codec option.
    I posted the link before but here it is:
    http://goo.gl/8GZq4i

  • Exporting files for Surround mix... fairly urgent!

    hi there... I'm having an advert piece i've written mixed in surround sound which is a first for me. it was all recorded and mixed my end in stereo so I need to know how best to export them for the mix engineer. I am yet to hear from them so I was wandering if anyone could answer the following:
    - Should I send split or interleaved files (assuming 48khz 24 bit .aifs are suitable)?
    - Where there is corrective or creative compression or EQ, should I keep in bounced versions?
    - Where tracks are panned, should I bounce this information or leave centered?
    - Where a track is bussed to a reverb for example, should I send the bus as a separate track, or send the original file wet?
    - Where more than one SFX appears on a track, should I separate them onto separate tracks?
    - I'm assuming I should retain creative volume rides in the bounced information (eg. long fades).
    And is there anything I'm overlooking? I'd be VERY grateful for any input (this has to be sent by tomorrow afternoon!).
    Thanks

    Q: Should I send split or interleaved files (assuming 48khz 24 bit .aifs are suitable)?
    A: Interleaved! see down here.
    Q: Where there is corrective or creative compression or EQ, should I keep in bounced versions?
    A: depends on the media you are going to ship your production.
    Q: Where tracks are panned, should I bounce this information or leave centered?
    A: Be shure your tracks are surround at the first place. then the pans could have been converted. better check in the Automation screen if it does.
    Q: Where a track is bussed to a reverb for example, should I send the bus as a separate track, or send the original file wet?
    A: By my knowledge is this your choice. In the bounce all tracks are mixed to the 5+1 (or the 7+1) channels.
    Q: Where more than one SFX appears on a track, should I separate them onto separate tracks?
    A: Deepends on the effects you have in mind. I see no reason do split it up.
    Other thing: if you are going to bounce be shure it is a PCM 48000 (required for replay on standard dvd player) Interleaved (all channels in one file) put the button Surround on.
    checking your work on a standard video-dvd-player is only possible if you put the audio files in to a video stream with a black image as video. there is no other option unless you have a DVD-A player in your collection. such a player is hard to find these days.
    hope this helps a little,
    R

Maybe you are looking for