Export error: value of length column (38) greater than VARDATA column (36)

Hello @,
I am performing an export on HP-UX/Oracle of a R/3 Enterprise 1.10 system.
I already use got the latest R3load binary. For pool table KAPOL I get
this strange error and I couldn't find any further information about it:
cat SAPPOOL.log
(EXP) TABLE: "DEBI"
(EXP) TABLE: "DVPOOL"
(EXP) TABLE: "DVPOOLTEXT"
(EXP) TABLE: "FINPL"
(EXP) TABLE: "GLTP"
(EXP) TABLE: "KALK"
value of length column (38) greater than VARDATA column (36)
(CNVPOOL) conversion failed for row 356 of table A004       VARKEY = 001V ZSP0003010TI060067A.01      00000000
(CNV) ERROR: data conversion failed. rc = 2
(DB) INFO: disconnected from DB
/usr/sap/AVT/SYS/exe/run/R3load: job finished with 1 error(s)
/usr/sap/AVT/SYS/exe/run/R3load: END OF LOG: 20110117114148
SQL> desc kapol
Name                                      Null?    Type
TABNAME                                   NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
VARKEY                                    NOT NULL VARCHAR2(195)
DATALN                                    NOT NULL NUMBER(5)
VARDATA                                            RAW(36)
SQL> select length(vardata),count(*) from kapol group by length(vardata);
LENGTH(VARDATA)   COUNT(*)
             72     183681
select dataln,count(*) from kapol group by dataln;
    DATALN   COUNT(*)
    -32730          2
        36     183679
Does this mean that one row in KAPOL has to be changed from within SAP?
Or could it be an error/bug within R3load?
Regards,
Mark
Edited by: Mark Foerster on Jan 17, 2011 12:46 PM

Maybe this information is of any help:
I opened a support call and was told by SAP support to change the
two entries from -32730 to -32732. Don't ask me why...

Similar Messages

How do I make a text box solid if the value in the field is greater than 0 and do this for all recor

Hello,
I have several text boxes on a document, and wish to make the boxes either solid or visible if the value in the field is greater than 0.
I am using an excel file for the data, each cell with either 1 or 0 (true or false).
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
BJ

Yes, I also sent an email regarding this problem.
I am using XNET to write a custom device for PXI-8516 LIN card.
I've attached a couple snippets showing where I've tracked the problem.
The only error that I've seen comes from the XNET Wait vi in the timeout snippet. I believe that error occurs because frame queued in the write snippet is never transmitted by the LIN card.
Attachments:
Timeout_Error_Snippet.png ‏22 KB
XNET_Write_Snippet.png ‏24 KB

ORA-00162: external dbid length 117 is greater than maximum(16)

A .net user facing this oracle issue any body plz identify the soution it will be very big help.This is the error.
ORA-00162: external dbid length 117 is greater than maximum(16)

Hello,
What's your Database name? Can you post content of your tnsnames.ora file?
Here is an example of tnsnames.ora
MYDB =
(DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST =192.168.1.100)(PORT = 1521))
    (CONNECT_DATA =
      (SERVER = dedicated)
      (SERVICE_NAME = MYDB)
)Regards
OrionNet

A message "Value in "Discount %" field is greater than permitted"

Hi Experts,
A message "Value in "Discount %" field is greater than permitted" will appear when adding an Issue for Production in production..

Hi Karthick,
Check Discount Limit for User
Administration-System Initialization-Authorization-General Authorization
and check Max Discount Limit
Regards,
Sandeep kr.

Maintaine error message if posting date is greater than Sch del date in PO

I have maintained a delivery schedule in a PO for a material
Say PO qty 100
Del Schedule
10.04.09 - 60
20.04.09 - 40
While GRN, for 60 qty, if posting date is greater than 10.04.09, system needs to throw error.
I want to do it for selected materials only.
Is there a way to do this.
Regards,
Rakesh

Thanx for reply
If I use OMCQ message , it will be applicable for all GRNs and I want for a particular set of materials.
Can one please suggest User exits / BADi for the same. I have checkd BADIs but those are based upon MSEG and EKBE table.. and i dont have any material doc no before posting the document.
requiement is to check the delivery sch date and posting date befor posting the document is posted.
Any suggestions welcomed.
Reagrds,
rakesh

Is there a correlation b/w Error -2048 and MPEG-4 files greater than 2GB?

I am having considerable difficulty in getting any of my DVD/movie files greater than 2GB to upload into my iTunes library. Anyone else having this difficulty? Through another problem, I discovered that iTunes ability to play video is based a thinned-down version of the Apple's QT engine, which prompted me to try and open these files using QT Pro; however, there too, I am getting a peculiar -2048 error suggesting it is not a movie file. The files were created using WONDERSHARE and I am experiencing difficulty with only the files that exceed 2GB in size.
For WONDERSHARE users, here are my relevant settings:
RESOLUTION: 720*400
CODEC: H.264
FPS: 30
KBPS: 2,000 or 2,500 (toggled in between both to manage file size for longer movies, like 3 hour Bollywood epics)
Any help on this matter woudl be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Tabish

Jon,
Thanks for your response. I have inserted commentary below:
I am having
considerable difficulty in getting any of my
DVD/movie files greater than 2GB to upload into my
iTunes library.The 2 GB
restriction is usually on your source file -- the DVD
VOB -- or associated with Fat-32 file system. I have
H.264 files as large as 3.8 GB for SD content.
The file system is NTFS. I am not sure what you mean by DVD VOB.
I discovered that
iTunes ability to play video is based a thinned-down
version of the Apple's QT
engineiTunes can access the
entire QT structure. The iPod and TV players are
limited to a modest QT sub-set.
O.K. But, QT still cannot open the file. If the files are corrupt, how come they only become corrupt at 2+ GB.
however, there too, I
am getting a peculiar -2048 error suggesting it is
not a movie file.If issued by an
Apple application, this error code usually equates to
"noMovieFound" at the referenced location. This could
be a path error or refer to a movie interrupt during
conversion (as when your 2 GB plus source file
terminates prematurely) and the target file is not
closed properly (and is likely not recognized as a
valid QT file).
CODEC:
H.264In which profile?
Again, not sure what you mean by "profile."

Error in VL01N(Delivery qty is greater than target qty while taking return)

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem "Delivery Quantity is greater than the target quantity" while doing the inbound delivery from VL01N t-code for sales returns with reference to return order.
I am trying to do the inbound delivery for the same Quantity which is in return order but still it is showing error.
I have checked my configuration and could not find any mistake under this process. I am not able to identify the error. In my delivery item category we have put "B" under over delivery check which is our business requirement.
If I remove "B" from delivery item category, i am not getting any error in inbound delivery but which is not right way of doing.
I could not find suitable query in SDN. Can any one please share your expertise to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Regards
Srinivas

You have to check the following:-
a) whether for that return delivery, picking is not activated
b) whether customer master or material master is maintained for over delivery tolerance
c) whether in VD51, any overdelivery tolerance is maintained
You can also have a look at the following notes:-
1) Note 151901 - Check of delivery quantity is consistent
2) Note 322588 - VLSP:incor.checks for qty to be delvrd during split
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Time values that add up to greater than 24 hours

Hi Apple SUpport Community,
I am trying to get a cell in Numbers to return a TIME value when the sum of two time values are greater than 24.
For example, if a worker has a shift that starts at 8pm and works for 6 hours and 15 minutes, the shift ends at ((20:00+06:15=26:15)-24:00)=02:15am the next day.
If I formulate a cell in numbers to add to time values, it comes return the nasty red triangle saying "The Formula's arguments can only contain one date value"
Thanks in advance for any help!
ST

a duration can be obtained by subtracting two time values (which are technically the date and the time). durations are specified as:
weeks, days, hours, minutes, seconds and milliseconds.
I do not know what you are trying to figure out...
- how long did the worker work? or
- when did the shift end?
can you state a question (without regard for the solution) so we can assist? Also a screen shot of what you enter and what you want as output would be helpful.
All that said you can subtract two times to get a duration. You can add durations to get another duration. You cannot add times. To specify that an entry is a time you enter in the format "0w 0d 30h 14m 22s 0ms" any of the entries with 0 may be omitted.
you can add durations in cells by using the "+" or "-" operator
as in A1-B1
where A1 contains "3h 45m" and B1 contains "1h 15m"
the result will be "2h 30m"

DTW error 10000100 Document total value must be zero or greater than zero

I am trying to import AR service invoices and I am getting an error.
I am using the Document and Document line files and I have tried several different ways but still get the same error.
On the main document file I have
DocNum,DocType,DocDate,DocDueDate,CardCode,NumAtCard,TaxDate,Doctotal
123 S (tried the ddocuemnt_Service) 20111130 20111130 1111 TEST 20111130 1.00
Document lines
ParentKey,LineNum,ItemDescription,TaxCode,FormatCode,Location,LineTotal
123 (blank) decription EX 418000 1 1.00
Now I have tried removing the total columns on 1 file, then alternating it...leaving it on both.
What am I missing here?
Thanks

Hi,
You may check this first: DTW Error when Importing A/R Quotation - document total value must be zero
Thanks,
Gordon

:Offset specification "+4" is greater than or equal to field length ("4")

hi all,
when i writing routine for Date field(len 8) in transfer rules, im getting below error
<b>:Offset specification "+4" is greater than or equal to field length ("4")</b>
the same routine in another old dev server , there were no syntax errors.
pls can anyone help me out in this
thanks

Activated transfer rules w/o routine , and again i created the same routine , no syntx errors.
thanks

Using EVDRE to return only records having a value greater than X

in the old reporting wizard you could use MDX statement like "return only those members/data where the value of some account is greater than 100".
Thus allowing you to select for instance those entities that had signinficant sales or the like.
In EVDRE i am looking for a way to do the same but apart from returning the Top n members or suppressing zero's i cannot fnd a way to do this. From an earlier post in the old outlooksoft consultancy forum (dating from march last year) i understood that this functionality was already prepared so i assumed it is in, but how ???? (if it is there of course).
I hope some of you have the answer.....
Thanks,
Edwin van Geel (SAP Netherlands)

Maggie, I think what David's answer implies is this:
You can't (now, 5.1) use EVDRE to do a suppression based on signeddata.
You can either build your entire report with EVENEs for the expansion, and EVGETs for the data retrieval (basically use the wizard templates) or use an EVENE for the expansion and EVDRE to only retrieve the data. The second option's a bit more complicated to set up, but likely the better approach in terms of performance and future-proofing.
Either way, in the EVENE you use the MDX filter, both to evaluate the data values, and the other filter requirement you have.

Invoice quantity greater than PO quantity (item without GR)

Dear All,
I want a restriction in Import PO where system should give error message when Invoice quantity is greater than PO quality ( and GR is not posted).Following setting has been done but still system is issuing any error or warning message.
1) Set System Message M8 087 as a Error in column online and BatchI in transaction OMRM.
2) In OMR6 for tolerance key DQ (Exceed amount: quantity variance) set upper limit zero (check limit) in val and %.
3) In MM-Inventory Management & Phy Invt.u2014Goods Receiptu2014Set tolerance Limit (OMC0)--for B1 and B2 (Order price qty variance (GR) / E and W message Upper limit is set as zero.
Please guide me where i am going wrong or need any other setting?

There is no tolerance key which compares the quantity/amount of the purchase order with the quantity/amount of the invoice.
This is the standard system design.
In the SAP standard release, the system checks the price and quantity variances on the basis of the default values for the goods
receipts. As a result, we can post invoices although the amounts and quantities in the invoice items are greater than the amounts and quantities in the corresponding purchase order items.
If we want the amounts and quantities for the purchase order items to be included in the tolerance check, we can use a customer enhancement (BADI) in the 'MRM_BADI_INVOICE_CHECK' function module to run the check on price and quantity variances based on the amounts and quantities from the purchase order item.

Rownum greater than query

Hi all,
first of all, what I am aware about...
I am aware about the fact, that ROWNUM filters, inside the query which is to be filtered by rownum, are incorrect. That is this is incorrect:
select * from <table> where rownum < 20;
Also I am aware, that the following will never return a result:
select * from <table> where rownum > 20;
That is clear. The correct version of the "less than" query is:
select * from (select * from <table> order by a) where rownum < 20;
Now the question: what does the last example still not work with "greater than" queries:
Take e.g. following example:
select * from (
select * from dba_objects order by object_name
) where rownum > 5
;

I ckeck it again. It's working for me !
Any way I'll quote it.
How ROWNUM Works
ROWNUM is a pseudocolumn (not a real column) that is available in a query. ROWNUM will be assigned the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, ... N, where N is the number of rows in the set ROWNUM is used with. A ROWNUM value is not assigned permanently to a row (this is a common misconception). A row in a table does not have a number; you cannot ask for row 5 from a table—there is no such thing.
Also confusing to many people is when a ROWNUM value is actually assigned. A ROWNUM value is assigned to a row after it passes the predicate phase of the query but before the query does any sorting or aggregation. Also, a ROWNUM value is incremented only after it is assigned, which is why the following query will never return a row:
select *
from t
where ROWNUM > 1;
Because ROWNUM > 1 is not true for the first row, ROWNUM does not advance to 2. Hence, no ROWNUM value ever gets to be greater than 1. Consider a query with this structure:
select ..., ROWNUM
from t
where <where clause>
group by <columns>
having <having clause>
order by <columns>;
Think of it as being processed in this order:
1. The FROM/WHERE clause goes first.
2. ROWNUM is assigned and incremented to each output row from the FROM/WHERE clause.
3. SELECT is applied.
4. GROUP BY is applied.
5. HAVING is applied.
6. ORDER BY is applied.
That is why a query in the following form is almost certainly an error:
select *
from emp
where ROWNUM <= 5
order by sal desc;
The intention was most likely to get the five highest-paid people—a top-N query. What the query will return is five random records (the first five the query happens to hit), sorted by salary. The procedural pseudocode for this query is as follows:
ROWNUM = 1
for x in
( select * from emp )
loop
exit when NOT(ROWNUM <= 5)
OUTPUT record to temp
ROWNUM = ROWNUM+1
end loop
SORT TEMP
It gets the first five records and then sorts them. A query with WHERE ROWNUM = 5 or WHERE ROWNUM > 5 doesn't make sense. This is because a ROWNUM value is assigned to a row during the predicate evaluation and gets incremented only after a row passes the WHERE clause.
Here is the correct version of this query:
select *
from
( select *
from emp
order by sal desc )
where ROWNUM <= 5;
This version will sort EMP by salary descending and then return the first five records it encounters (the top-five records). As you'll see in the top-N discussion coming up shortly, Oracle Database doesn't really sort the entire result set—it is smarter than that—but conceptually that is what takes place.

VL 363 Delivery quantity is greater than target quantity 22.800 FT

If I am using BDC to create outbound delivery then i am getting below error:
VL 363 Delivery quantity is greater than target quantity 22.800 FT
But if I am using BAPI to create outbound delivery, then i am not getting any message and delivery is being created but includes only those items for which delivery qty is less than below order qty. I want to have error message in case of BAPI also.
What is the solution? Is there any enhancement of function module available to have this message.
Regards,
Vijay

Dear VIjay,
Are you using contract has reference to create the delivery, then below link could be of help.
[Error Delivery|Error: Delivery quantity is greater than target quantity]
Thanks
Murtuza

SP to Block GRPO Qty if greater than PO Qty

Hi all,
I need to block the GRPO Document when adding it if the Qty in the GRPO is greater than the PO Qty.
But this Stored Procedure blocks me even when i raise the GRPO with Qty less than the PO Qty.
IF @transaction_type IN ('A') AND
(@Object_type = '20')
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT T1.BaseEntry
FROM dbo.OPDN T0
INNER JOIN dbo.PDN1 T1 ON T1.DOCENTRY = T0.DocEntry
INNER JOIN dbo.POR1 T2 ON T2.DOCENTRY = T1.BaseEntry
WHERE T1.BaseType = '22' AND
T1.ItemCode = T2.ItemCode AND
T1.BaseLine = T2.LineNum AND
T0.DOCENTRY = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del
GROUP BY T1.BaseEntry
HAVING SUM(T1.Quantity) > SUM(T2.OpenQty))
Begin
SELECT @Error = 10, @error_message = 'GRPO quantity is greater than PO quantity'
End
END
Is something wrong with this SP...

Hi
Check bellow Sp
--------------- Validation for Goods Receipt PO Restricting Excess Qunatity ----------------------------
IF @Object_type = '20' and @transaction_type = 'A'
BEGIN
declare @line int
SELECT @line = (LineNum + 1)
From PDN1
Where PDN1.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del
and (Quantity > BaseOpnQty)
Order by LineNum
If (not ISNULL(@line, 0) = 0)
begin
Set @error = 10
Set @error_message = 'Line quantity' + CONVERT(nvarchar(4), @line) +' is more then open quantity !'
end
END
Thanks& Regards
AndakondaRamudu

Export error: value of length column (38) greater than VARDATA column (36)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for