Extended search problem in SRM

Hi,
We have a problem with extended search in SRM while checking the status.
In Status
If I have selected 'Awaiting approval' and clicked on start button, now it is showing all the SC of awating approvals status.
If I have selected 'In approval inbox' and clicked on start button, now it is showing all
the SC of 'In your Inbox' & 'Awaiting approval' status.
If I have selected both 'In your inbox' in status and check 'Bought on Behalf of' and clicked on start button, now it is showing the SC's of 'Awaiting approval' and normal SC(without creating with on behalf of).
What might be the issue. How to solve.
Any OSS Notes available for this issue.
Regards,
Chandu

Hi Jagan,
If your SC is considered as complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
- prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
- custom checks in user exits in R/3
- error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
Kind regards,
Yann

Similar Messages

  • SC : Extended  Search on Header Customer field

    Hi ,
    I have created customer defined field on Header & Item in SRM 5.0 .
    I am showing both of them on Extended Search in Check Status of Shopping Cart .
    But I can search on the basis of Item Customer field <b>not</b> on the basis of Header Customer Fields .
    There is flaw in BBP_PDH_SEARCH_SC FM on header Cus. field .
    Has anyone encounter these problem .
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sachin

    Hi,
      For SC,you cannot search on custom fields at the header level.
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

  • How disable the Extended Search default in the BBP_AUCTION

    Hi Experts,
    How could I disable the Extended Search in the BBP_AUCTION in SRM 4.0 ?  
    Just for one user I getting the Extend Search by default and the message "(Note: Extended Search Active)". 
    We need the simple search default fot this user.
    We try apply the SAP Note 990490 but the problem did not solve.
    Regards,
    André Aguiar

    The note suggest by SAP worked.

  • Problem in SRM (with backend PO)

    Hi,
    I have a problem in creating a PO with backend product category in backend. The error message is some backend documents could not be determined.
    But I could able to create a PR Reservation and Direct PO for the same Product Category. (in the backend and in SRM too).
    Org Structure:
    I have maintained the transaction type in attribute tab. (backend/EC).
    I have maintained the Product Responsibilties and Org Responsibilities for the Respective Pgrp. (Product Cateogeries)
    I also have maintained the Product Categories in Extended attributes.
    In SRM I havent maintained the transaction type for the EC but I have maintained the follow on document number range. (shopping cart)
    The Transaction Type is maintained in the backend and the number range as external.
    I have also maintained the Product categories in Technical Basic settings and defined the backend system with respect Product categories in Cross application basic settings.
    Please let me know if you need any more information...
    Thanks
    Jagan

    Hi Jagan,
    If your SC is considered as complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
    For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
    Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
    - prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
    - custom checks in user exits in R/3
    - error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Can we use both Stand alone and Extended classic in one SRM system

    Hi All,
    Our client is now using Stand alone SRM system with back-end R/3 FI-CO system. Now they want to go Extended classic scenario for few product categories.
             Would it be possible to use both in one SRM system? If possible could you please provide what are the sequential steps to do this?
                 Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ram

    Hi Ramesh,
    How did you end up solving your problem, as i have the same scenario.  Did you use this BADI (
    SRM Server->Business Add-Ins->Control Extended Classic Scenario->Activate Extended Classic Scenario)?  Based on my reading, it seems this BADI is relevant to switch between extended classic and classic scenarios. 
    From what i understand, we can control the standalone scenario via the define backend system configuration (SAP SRM -> SRM Server -> Technical Basic Settings -> Define Backend System for Product Category).  In my scenario, I have one set of product categories, so i will likely need to implement this BADI (BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS, method:   DETERMINE_LOGSYS - SAP SRM -> SRM Server -> Business Add-Ins ->Shopping Carts and Requirement Items -> Determine Backend System / Company Code) in order to determine the correct backend system based on company/plant for example. 
    Did you then leave the extended classic scenario activated (IMG --> Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM Server-> Cross-Application Basic Settings->
    Activate Extended Classic Scenario)? 
    Or how did you achieve both standalone and extended classic using one SRM server?
    cheers,
    AD

  • BBPSC04 "extended search" as default?

    Dear SRM gurus!
    In BBPSC04 (check status) is it possible to set the "extended search" as default setting?
    Thanks and best regards,
    Henning

    Hi Hubert,
    did you already find a solution for this issue?
    Thanks for your answer.
    Regards,
    Henning

  • LSO - Search and Extended Search are not working

    Hi ,
    From the learning portal we click on Search and Extended Search , nothing is diplay by the system . We have course matching the description . Also in the back office : LSO_TRAININGTYPE_SEARCH_C seems to be OK .
    Any help will be welcome, should work out of the box .
    Thank you.

    Hi Schutz
    Were you able to resolve this? If so could you please provide the solution. We are also facing the same kind of problem. It works in QA but not in Production.
    Thanks, Raj

  • Extended search account assignment BBP_POC

    Guys,
    Got a question about the account search in BBP_POC. Don't know where to look anymore, but it's probably easy to solve.
    When a user searches (in extended search) on account assignment Cost Center with a value he gets a result.
    When he changes the account assignment type to Internal Order and searches on a particular internal order there's no result. However, if you know the PO number and search on that directly a result is shown.
    Non of the users are able to get a result on account assignment type Internal Order.
    Any idea what the solution could be?
    We're SP18 of SRM 5.0 ECS
    Regards,
    Timo

    Implemented note 1586602

  • Passing Search Parameter to SRM-MDM Through the URL

    Greeting all,
    I would like to know how I can pass a search parameter to SRM-MDM using the URL in the web browser. This is needed to display the result directly instead of listing the whole catalog contents.
    I am trying to pass a search parameter (Text string) to the catalog through an R/3 SAP system. As a result, it should give only the material that I am looking for.
    I tried the "Background Search" as described in the OCI-specification paper but still couldn't get it!
    By using the parameters mentioned in chapter 3.2.4 of OCI-specification paper, I did the recommended configuration and use the following URL but still failed to pass the parameter:  http://....&FUNCTION=BACKGROUND_SEARCH&SEARCHSTRING=searchterm
    Can anyone help me on that?!
    Regards,
    Yousif

    Hi Yousif,
    Why dont u save the search as a named search in MDM and then pass it onto the SRM MDM.
    Save the records  as Named search in MDM Data Manager
    For eg:
    Named Search name -->> search1
    Now while passing the parameters to the SRM MDM Catalog specify the Named Search in its url.
    http://J2EESERVER:PORTNO/SRM-MDM/SRM_MDM?sap-locale=EN&HOOK_URL=&mask=&namedSearch=search1&username=Admin&password=PASSWORD&catalog=REPOSITORYNAME&server=MDMSERVERIPADDRESS&datalanguage=EN
    After passing the named search in the hook url the you will be able to see only the search which was saved in Data Manager.
    Hope dis helps u
    Regards Tejas.........

  • Shopping cart - Status: extended search as default

    Is it possible to set the extended search as default setting for all users?
    Regards
    Hubert

    Hi Hubert,
    did you already find a solution for this issue?
    Thanks for your answer.
    Regards,
    Henning

  • Restricting vendors in search help in srm portal

    Hi,
    I need to restrict certain vendors in search help in srm portal while creating shopping cart.
    These vendors should not be visible to the users for selection.
    I tried in the BBP_F4IF_SHLP_EXIT_VENDOR_EXP of the search help BBP_BUPA_VENDOR, but its not working.
    Thanks in advance.
    Aravind

    Hi,
       1) Use tcode BP and enter the vendor number and in the last tab (control). Select central block.
       2)  Use program BUPA_TEST_DELETE for the vendors.

  • Extended search by default with  closed SC actived as well??

    Hi,
    Does anybody know if I can put Extended search by default with show also closed SC actived as well.
    Could I put a customer field in first place in the search criteria??
    It might be done using screen variant or BADI? or I should modify templates or standard code.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Jorge

    Hi Jorge,
    how did you implement the request? We have the same request.
    Thanks from
    Joe

  • Extended search for contracts

    When I select a purchasing organisation in the extended search criteria, the search results returned are those that are expected. However if I change the purchasing org the old value is retained. If I delete the old value and search again it is put back into the search field by the system. Also, when I choose a product category sometimes the results give me all the contracts when I am expecting no results.
    We have applied notes 1088749 and 1067327...still the issue persists....
    Is there a new note for this issue?
    Regards
    Vinay Sridhar

    to go into details:
    I am facing the following issue when trying to search for contracts or global outline agreement:
    When I try to search for a contract after clicking the Extended search...I enter a purch. organisation and some results are displayed.
    However if I change the purchasing org the old value is retained. If I delete the old value and search again it is put back into the search field by the system.
    Also, when I choose a product category sometimes the results give me all the contracts when I am expecting no results.
    We have applied notes 1088749 and 1067327...still the issue persists....
    Is there a new note for this issue?

  • Outlook 2010, Exchange 2010 - Searching Problems

    Anyone out there able to help with some searching problems some of our users have been seeing?
    Searching in OWA works fine but some people have problems when searching for older emails in Outlook. We've rebuilt Outlook profiles, rebuilt the windows index's (which seems to work but only temporarily). If there's a way to schedule the Windows index to
    rebuild every night or once  week, I'd be very happy to test that out but haven't been able to figure out how to do that.
    Anyone have any other ideas?

    Hi,
    It seems something keeps corrupting the index... Run Anti-virus program and Malicious Software Removal Tool to scan your system, check if there's any virus or malware that may cause the index issue.
    If this issue persists, please also go to File tab ->
    Options -> Search -> Indexing Options
    -> Advanced -> Click Troubleshoot search and indexing, to do some troubleshooting steps to find the possible cause.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Melon Chen
    TechNet Community Support

  • Adding a new button in the PO search summary in SRM 3

    Hello gurus,
    my requirement is to add a new button in the search summary for PO in SRM. Here's the task: every time a search is executed, the result is a list of purchase orders and every item has on the left two icons, "Show PO" and "Modify PO". There are merely a shortcut that brings the user to the PO screen in which the document is shown/can be modified.
    These two buttons are standard... my task is to add a new button in the template, "Copy PO", which should be a shortcut to the omonimous button which is present in the PO view screen. So I think this new button should work as the two standard ones.
    In order to do so, I looked into the proper template: SAPLBBP_PDH_SEARCH, screen 3003, which belongs to the package BBP_PRODOC_C (ITS service BBPSEARCH).
    I tried to "duplicate" the part referring to a standard button (e.g. the "display icon" chunk), obtaining a new chunk which represents the new button in the template.
    And... it works, in the sense that the button is visible and clickable. So far so good. Here's the questions since I'm not absolutely an expert on Jscript... My button, once clicked, triggers my FORM (PO_COPY) which should receive the header GUID of the Puchase Order.
    In debug I've seen that the form fails since it does not receive any parameter, and that's probably related to this section:
    (angle brackets omitted, it gave me an error posting tags in sdn)
    "JavaScript:HyperSubmit('PO_COPY', '`MAINLIST-LINE_NUMBER[j].value`')"
    The problem is I did not understand how to check for possible parameters of this HyperSubmit method. Also, I'd like to check what's the structure of MAINLIST (as far as I've seen,  MAINLIST-LINE_NUMBER[j].value is a parameter passed to the form) but don't know how to see that. Can anyone please direct me through these passages? Thanks in advance.

    Hi Matteo Montalto,
    Please let me know how you added new button.
    Regards,
    neelima

Maybe you are looking for