F-92: Retirement with revenue

Could any one check and clarify on the following:
a) Is it possible to post an acquisition using t.code f-92.
b) If yes, how does the accounting entry look like?
c) What will be the balances in that particular asset history.
d) If we retire the asset after posting the above, how does the loss / profit of that particular asset reflect?
Thanks,
P K

Hi PK,
Basically F-92 is used for posting Asset retirement with Customer and F-90 is used for Acquisition as per Standard SAP. But you can post the acquisition also, but you need to use the correct Posting Keys while doing so. Basically the screen for both F-90 and F-92 is the same, it is only the posting key and the document type that makes the difference.
Use Doc Type KR, Posting key 31, give the vendor and use posting key 70 give the asset number and post for acquisition.
Regards
Sridhar
Regards
Sridhar

Similar Messages

Issue with Asset Retirement without Revenue (ABAVN)

Hi Experts, hope that you are able to help shed some light on an issue with retirement without revenue (Scrapping).
We have an asset capitalised in FY 2007 with two depreciation areas 01 - Book & 15 Tax. There have then been settlements made to the asset from WSB Elements using transaction type 331 & 336. These were through FY 2008 and depreciation was calculated correctly throughout this time.
The issue was then in FY 2009 when there have been negative settlements posted (adjustments) to the asset and then the asset was retired. The retirement was posted but the values aren't what was expected. It was my belief that the posting should be credit APC, debit accumulated depreciation and then posting to a loss account defined in AO86.
Period Control are the same for retirement '01' for both the straight-line method in book depreciation and the declining balance method in the tax depreciation area .
The posting has been pretty much as expected in the book depreciation area - but in the tax depreciation area where the depreciation key is declining balance there is a reported gain from the retirement.
The report for depreciation are 01 - book shows retirement $1m split between $1.1m in PY and -$0.1m in Current Year.
The issue is that in the tax depreciation area the amount posted for retirement is $1.0 but depreciation posted is $1.125 and -$0.5 with a respective Gain for both prior year (PY) and current year... why has this happened ???
Thanks in advance
Chris
Retirement posting:
PK 75 CR APC value                 TType 200
PK 70 DR Acc. Dep'n CY          TType 250
PK 70 DR Amortisation              TType 290

Thanks Tarun,
I've solved checking the limitation in Customizing. There was a limitation for the Retirement: this was activated only for first Depreciation Area, so for the other ones no retirement will be calculated and net book value was always not equal to zero.
Regards,
Jody

Enter a true account assignment object with revenues

Hi there,
At my current client site we implemented COPA - Costing Based. I mapped a few revenue accounts to COPA. Now when I try to make a posting in to COPA using FB70 . The system issues a error Message "Enter a true account assignment object with revenues" . I know the Prof Segment is the account assignment object its looking for and the system is not deriving it from the information I entered in the FB70 document. Am I missing somethig here? Did anyone out there face similar issue??
You inputs are highly appreciated!
Regards,
Siva Padallaparthy

Hi Siva,
Please check note 373823 for this error. Also please go through the long text of error message KI166. The solution of the error is mentioned in the long text itself.
Regards,
Abhisek

Enter a true account assignment object with revenues while reversing FB08

Hi All
When I am reversing the document through FB08 I am getting the warning messege "Enter a true account assignment object with revenues"
Message no. KI166
Diagnosis
You made an account assignment for 31211100, a revenue element, in controlling area 1000 to a cost center or profit center.
System Response
Cost centers and profit centers can carry revenues in the SAP system as statistics only. To ensure reconciliation between FI and CO for revenue element 31211100, a CO account assignment object must record the revenues as a real value. This object type is used for updating to the reconciliation ledger.
In principle, it is possible for the SAP system to automatically derive this CO account assignment object, the reconciliation object. However, all postings made in CO for costing-based Profitability Analysis are logged in the reconciliation ledger under "reconciliation object". In this manner, the reconciliation ledger identifies the exact values flowing into the operating profit. If you post reconciliation objects during revenue postings to cost centers or profit centers, you must do so while keeping the interpretation of the reconciliation ledger reports in mind. The sums of revenue postings to profitability segments, cost centers, and profit centers cannot be broken down further.
Procedure
To avoid posting to reconciliation objects, make account assignments to a real CO account assignment object.
If you want to post to reconciliation objects, you can change this message to a warning or a note for future users, or deactivate the message entirely. Use the Implementation Guide under "Controlling: General" and choose Change message control. Enter area KI and message number 166. If you do not enter an individual user here, the change is valid for all users.
It is not allowing me to reverse the document already posted.
Please guide
Thanks in Advance
Sonal

Hi,
Do you have this cost element maintained in OKB9 with a reference to an internal order or profitability segment? If yes, please look at the note 373823.
Regards,
Eli

Internal order with revenues: settling to FI and PSG

Hi,
I have this scenario:
- internal order with revenues has to settle to FI when not TECO - this is working
- when order status becomes TECO - it has to reverse the previous posting - it' s working
and settle to PSG, acording to settlment rule - this is the part where I need help, because it's not working.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks,
Lavinia

Hi,
Sorry for the delay and thank for you answer, but I have the PA transfer structure configured, also the settlement profile alows PSG and the transfer structuer is alocate to the settlemnet profile. The thing is that when I don't have a RA key, the settlement to PSG is working fine.
Anyway, the customer changed his mind and doesn't need RA for this type of orders and for the moment I don't need a solution
Best regards,
Lavinia

Enter a true account assignment object with revenues - WARNING MESSAGE

Hi All Experts,
I am configuring PCA. Where my GL balances are not getting updated with having assignment of Profit Center. I am getting this below warning message :
Enter a true account assignment object with revenues
Message no. KI166
Diagnosis
You made an account assignment for 410000, a revenue element, in controlling area 8000 to a cost center or profit center.
System Response
Cost centers and profit centers can carry revenues in the SAP system as statistics only. To ensure reconciliation between FI and CO for revenue element 410000, a CO account assignment object must record the revenues as a real value. This object type is used for updating to the reconciliation ledger.
In principle, it is possible for the SAP system to automatically derive this CO account assignment object, the reconciliation object. However, all postings made in CO for costing-based Profitability Analysis are logged in the reconciliation ledger under "reconciliation object". In this manner, the reconciliation ledger identifies the exact values flowing into the operating profit. If you post reconciliation objects during revenue postings to cost centers or profit centers, you must do so while keeping the interpretation of the reconciliation ledger reports in mind. The sums of revenue postings to profitability segments, cost centers, and profit centers cannot be broken down further.
Procedure
To avoid posting to reconciliation objects, make account assignments to a real CO account assignment object.
If you want to post to reconciliation objects, you can change this message to a warning or a note for future users, or deactivate the message entirely. Use the Implementation Guide under "Controlling: General" and choose Change message control. Enter area KI and message number 166. If you do not enter an individual user here, the change is valid for all users.
I dont understand when I am giving PC as CO Object assignment which is I think true assignment for revenue collecting over. Still system showing this warning message. I know this can be supressed by just pressing ENTER and I can save. By posting in this way document even , I am not able to draw any report based on PC, neither KE5Z or F.01. All says No data found.
What configuration piece I am missing ? Can any expert guide ?
Regards,
Revati Joshi.

Just go to OKB9 and check the Cost Element, whether any default cost center or Profitability segment have been been assigned or
not.
If not, check if the Cost element is Revenue related, assign Profitability analisys. If not, check with settings of PCA.
You shoukd never assign PC to a cost element ntil unless it is a Revenue element.
Hope it helps
Thanks

Enter a true account object with revenues

Hi,
I am geting the Warning :enter a true account object with revenues .--- when i am posting a sales invoice.f-22
actuvally i am trying to enter business area and cost center too in the sales invoice.That time i am geting the above warning.
what to do to avoid this warning.
If we neglect this warning,is there any effect in the reports?
please let me know.
Points are awaiting for right one.Thanking you very much.

Hi,
It seems that you are entering statistical account assignment object. Check if your cost center is statistical. If you are processing invoice based on order, check the a/c assignment object of Sales order.
Regards

Error:Enter a true account assignment object with revenues

Hi expert,
Pl advise it is coming at the time of making entry through F-02.I have selected GL for sales.Then this error comes.
Regards,
Samar

Hi Experts,
When i do entry in F-02,following error comes:
Enter a true account assignment object with revenues
Message no. KI166
Diagnosis
You made an account assignment for 700000, a revenue element, in controlling area 1000 to a cost center or profit center.
System Response
Cost centers and profit centers can carry revenues in the R/3 System as statistics only. To ensure reconciliation between FI and CO for revenue element 700000, a CO account assignment object must record the revenues as a real value. This object type is used for updating to the reconciliation ledger.
In principle, it's possible for the R/3 System to automatically derive this CO account assignment object, the reconciliation object. However, all postings made in CO for costing-based Profitability Analysis are logged in the reconciliation ledger under "reconciliation object". In this manner, the reconcilation ledger identifies the exact values flowing into the operating profit. If you post reconciliation objects during revenue postings to cost centers or profit centers, you must do so while keeping the interpretation of the reconciliation ledger reports in mind. The sums of revenue postings to profitability segments, cost centers, and profit centers cannot be broken down further.
Procedure
To avoid posting to reconciliation objects, make account assignments to a real CO account assignment object.
If you want to post to reconciliation objects, you can change this message to a caution or a note for future users, or deactivate the message entirely. Use the Implementation Guide under "Controlling: General" and choose Change message control. Enter area KI and message number 166. If you do not enter an individual user here, the change is valid for all users.
Pl advise.
Regards,
Samar

Internal Order Settlement for Orders with Revenues

Hi
How do you set up the system to allocate costs only to a cost centre and not the revenue for internal orders with revenues. Any help is greatly appreciated.

In the allocation structure you have give source cost elements .. there give only Cost Elements/group of cost elements which are relating to expenses.. .. then only expenses will be settled .
best regards
assign points if useful
Message was edited by:
Emani

Service Resource Related Billing with Revenue Recognization

Hey Guys,
Some one could briefly explain me what is the Service Resource related billing with Revenue Recognization.
The business process with any sample power point presentation and configuration document will be appreciated.
If someone have the time for KT will also welcome.
Thanks
ANGKS
Edited by: ANGKS on Sep 16, 2008 10:35 PM
Edited by: ANGKS on Sep 16, 2008 11:35 PM
Edited by: ANGKS on Sep 16, 2008 11:37 PM

Dear ANGKS,
Please go through this SAP help link it will help you about Resource related billing for service.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/59/54fc37004d0a1ee10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Order with revenues settlement

Hi all,
I created an order with revenues and I post on that order cost and revenues.
And I want to settle this order to a cost center, but I want to settle both, cost and revenues. Can I do that? Can I settle revenues and cost toghether?
Thanks a lot!

Depends on how you have defined your revenue cost elements.
If you define them as type 1, you will not have any problems settling them to CC. However, if you have defined them as type 11, you cannot settle to CC as CC accept only statistical revenue postings - you would still need a real cost object to post the revenues to.
Praveen.

HELP: AR Open Invoices Conversion with Revenue Recognition (Daily Revenue)

Hi,
I need some help on Conversion of AR Open Invoices with Accounting Rules in R12, Here the client wanted to use Daily Revenue Schedule rule,
I am developing Functional Specification Document (CV.040); Need to understand the Assumptions, Approach and Which data needs to be extracted from Legacy System.
Appreciate your reply at the earliest
Thanks
Ravi

Anil,
Thanks for your response, Here are the answers to your questions.
1) The invoices that you want to convert - Do they already have revenue recognition on them?
Ans: Yes they have Revenue Recognition On Them.
2) Are you bringing only Open Invoices? What about Invoices that are closed (paid), but still have unrecognized revenue on them? DO you want to bring them
over? If no, how will be mage the recognition of those invoices?
Ans: We want to bring only Open Invoices. i.e the following scenarios want in Data Extraction
a) Invoice is Fully Paid (REC is Zero) and Unearned is Full Invoice Amount, Revenue is 0
b) Invoice is Partially Paid (REC is Partial) and Unearned is Partial, Revenue is partial
c) Invoice is fully Paid (Rec is Zero) and Unearned is Partial and Revenue is Partial
d) We do not want to bring the invoices with Fully Paid and Fully Recognized, Unearned is Zero
3) What about partially paid invoices? How do you want to bring them in?
Ans: See above scenarios.
4) Do you want to bring in all Invoice details,or just bring in a summary line with the outstanding amount?
we assume only Summary, but if the Invoices with Several Lines and Different Accounting Rules, We may have to bring them too
Appreciate your response; Suggest some possibilties?
Thanks
Ravi

Sum of Total(LC) to be tally with Revenue captured in PLD

Dear Expert,
Whenever we give Total Discount at AR Invoice Footer, the actual Revenue captured will be different as Total (LC), because the Total Discount will be deducted from each row equally.
How can we show the actual Unit Price and Total(LC) in AR Invoice PLD so that the sum of Total(LC) can be tally with the AR Invoice JE Revenue?
Thanks.
Regards,
Lay Chin

Hi Gordon,
Ok, I am trying the query, I am using StockSUM at INV1, feel that this is the correct field by testing a few orders.
Is it the correct field? If bz nvm, sorry to trouble you and thanks for the advise.
Thanks.
Regards,
Lay Chin

UNBILLED RECIEVABLE ACCOUNT- SERVICE CONTRACT WITH REVENUE RECOGNITION

Hi SAP Gurus,
I want to draw your kind attention towards my problem:
I have created service contract with one year contract and created an invoice for the whole year in advance.
Now in-between i cancelled a contract (after three months) and want to recognised a revenue for the contract period , so i'm creating a revenue recognition for the three months one by one using transaction code-VF44,
first month revenue recogniton is working fine as first month amount is going from deffered account to revenue account
But for second month instead of deffered account ,system is using unbilled recievable account ,which is wrong .
Can anybody tell me why the system is picking unbilled receivable account instead of deffered account in case of second month revenue recogniton.
This may help us:
"When i was cancelling a contract ,at that time i was entering a billing plan end date in billing plan tab at an item level.
and just after entering end date ,system was creating two lines instead of one in billing plan tab and i think because of that extra line system is picking unbilled receivables in second revenue recognition."
Thanks in advance
Ujjawal
Edited by: Ujjawal Singh Karki on Dec 29, 2010 12:05 PM

Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
I am doing a contract billing for overall period that is for 12 months (contract is of 12 months).
Just after 3 months i have realized that somehow we have to cancel the contract and we canceled that in 3rd month.
I had created the created a contract with periodic billing plan and for canceling that contract i'm putting contract end date in BILLING PLAN TAB as 31/03/2011 (Let say contract is from 01/01/2011 to 31/12/2011).
Can you/anybody please tell me whether is this the correct way of canceling the contract with periodic billing plan?
As per your analysis:
"It seems you have done the billing document for one period and you are doing the RR document for multiple periods and hence the revenue is going to unbilled receivable account for the period for which billing document has not been done"
As i have billed the customer for 12 months but contract was only for 3 months so i'll create RR for only 3 months and for rest of the period (i.e. 9 months) i'll create credit memo and send it to customer.
"Please use a billing type where you will specify only start date and end date of the contract and not the billing plan in contract"
How can we use billing type for contract start and end date .
I think as soon as i'm changing the dates in billing plan tab system is proposing another line item with different billing dates and that is not getting covered under deferred account that is still unbilled amount .
Waiting for your valuable inputs.
In case of any clarification kindly revert to me.
Thanks,
Ujjawal
Edited by: Ujjawal Singh Karki on Jan 20, 2011 11:10 AM

Problems with revenue's settlement

Good morning,
When I execute a revenue settlement (CJ88) from WBS to asset, the following error appears:
The sender has revenues or customer down payments with cost element 112030 (business transaction: CO Through-postings from FI).
You cannot settle these revenues or customer down payments to receiver FXA 40000005 0.
We're using cost element category 11 and the revenue posting is recorded in PS table. Moreover, we recorded the cost element in allocation structure.
Is it possible to settle revenues to asset under construction?
thanks
Marcel

if the revenue is set up as negative cost then it should be fine

F-92: Retirement with revenue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for