F110 clearing
Hi,
I have some vendors of which master data have a customer number and for these vendors customer clearing is acitve.
In the F110 prorposal display I need to see the vendor account and customer account balances separately in the first screen without clicking to see the line items of the payment.
In the end what I want is to see the vendors whose related customer account has debit balances and not include these customers in the payment program.
Thanks,
Maybe you can redefine the screen with the ABAPer, but there is no standard option. In you want to see then go to FBL1N and give the vendor and check box customer items down in the type area. This will display both the line items if this vendor contains a customer clearing.
Similar Messages
-
F110 - Clearing of Credit Memo and Invoice Document in Customer account
Hi,
The scenario is, the customer is posted with invoice amount of 3000 and a credit memo of 500. Instead of clearing this manually using f-32 can we use F110 to clear the debit and credit with in a customer account which must create a residual document for the differential (2500)
please advice, and the steps to be performed to achieve the scenario.
Best regards
AbishayHi All,
we have activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P " and Switch "MM_SFWS_CI_01 - Enhanced Functions in EhP4 for Applications in Materials Management" using Tcode SFW1. And followed all instructions documented when activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P ". The Busines function is activated to order to clear downpayments at the time of invoice posting in MIRO or MIR7. When I post the invoice in MIRO system is posting 2 indepedent document as below.
1. Invoice posting,
Dr GR/IR
Cr Vendor
2. Downpayment Recovery
Dr Vendor
Cr Vendor with SP GL Indicator "C"
My point is, as per the link http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/48/b42c22e8603095e10000000a421937/frameset.htm, it says "You can use the Down Payment Clearing function to clear down payments that you have posted with reference to a purchase order without going to the relevant financial accounting transactions, directly in logistics invoice verification."
But, in my case, the system is not clearing the downpayment but instead is just posting a Credit memo account entry with SP GL indicator (refer to th Downpayment Entry).
Please advice if SAP is designed to clear the downpayment in LIV or just to post the downpayment recovery entry.
If advice on any corrections to be applied.
Best regards
Abishay Solomon -
Hi experts,
Do you happen to know configuration concerning clearing of debit and credit items on a single payment for vendor/customer?
I don't want open debit and credit lines to be compensated and cleared together after running payment in F110.
Please helpHi,
In F110 > tab "Free Selections"
Select the field BSEG-SHKZG "Debit/Credit ind" and give the value as H
Then only credit lines will be picked up in payment run.
Regards,
Gaurav -
F110 - clear debits in one vendor with credits in another vendor
Hi Experts
We have a scenario where there are two vendor accounts created in SAP for two different business processes done with same vendor.
For example -
Vendor A created in SAP for all finished goods purchases from XYZ ltd
Vendor B created in SAP for all raw materials purchased from XYZ ltd
Both Vendor A & Vendor B have same payment details using the concept of alternate payee.
So it is possible some times that Vendor A has debit balance and Vendor B has credit balance.
In such circumstances, we want to net off Vendor A balance with Vendor B and make only the net payment to XYZ limited.
We want to achieve these through F110 as we need to reflect these details on payment remittance sent to vendor.
We do not want to use F.13 functionality by setting up OB74 configuration.
Please let me know if it is possible. Any inputs on this will be helpful.
Regards,
SantoshHi
Thanks for your reply. Alternate payee will work only to ensure that payments are made to the desired vendor. However it does not help clearing in credit and debits in different vendor accounts though they have same alternate payee. It consider each vendor as different and makes payment individual even though they have same alternate payee. Could you please suggest if there are any other work around.
Regards,
Santosh -
F110 Clearing of Zero Payments
Hi Experts:
Sometimes we realize we have made an overpayment and will issue a credit memo (CM) to a vendor account. Subsequent invoices will then post. If the CM and invoices net to zero we find that F110 will automatically clear vendor items that net to zero. These show as posting orders in the payment run log. They also show in the Payment Settlement List as "zero balance notifications". In addition, no cheque, EFT, or payment advice notices are generated. This means that the vendor is not aware that the items have been cleared.
My clients would like to clear these items manually. Application of payment blocks to the CM is an option but not practical because we cannot apply a payment block to subsequent invoices because these are generated automatically (ie recurring payments).
How can we get F110 to NOT clear vendor items that net to zero?
Thanks
LisaHi All,
we have activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P " and Switch "MM_SFWS_CI_01 - Enhanced Functions in EhP4 for Applications in Materials Management" using Tcode SFW1. And followed all instructions documented when activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P ". The Busines function is activated to order to clear downpayments at the time of invoice posting in MIRO or MIR7. When I post the invoice in MIRO system is posting 2 indepedent document as below.
1. Invoice posting,
Dr GR/IR
Cr Vendor
2. Downpayment Recovery
Dr Vendor
Cr Vendor with SP GL Indicator "C"
My point is, as per the link http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/48/b42c22e8603095e10000000a421937/frameset.htm, it says "You can use the Down Payment Clearing function to clear down payments that you have posted with reference to a purchase order without going to the relevant financial accounting transactions, directly in logistics invoice verification."
But, in my case, the system is not clearing the downpayment but instead is just posting a Credit memo account entry with SP GL indicator (refer to th Downpayment Entry).
Please advice if SAP is designed to clear the downpayment in LIV or just to post the downpayment recovery entry.
If advice on any corrections to be applied.
Best regards
Abishay Solomon -
I'm trying to find out which program utilized for the F110 to post in the company bank account and clearing the vendor.
Does anyone know?
ThanksThis is the Global Program, I need to know what´s the "function" or transaction thet the F110 call for clearing the item in the vendor.
-
F110 - Clearing Date for Documents
We Run the F110 on 28.07.2011 and it is run with successfully for payments. But actually we run it on 28.07.2011 Date but it will take for the clearing documents 29.07.2011.
I don't know how it will take for clearing documents with 29.07.2011?
Can you explain about itHi:
In F110...parameters tab, please check the document entered up to date or the free selection tab what you have specified in there. System takes the invoices according to the date Document entered up to date or whatever you specify in the free selection tab.
Regards -
Dear Experts,
I have performed a payment through F110 with a wrong clearing account which, Now the documents have been cleared with wrong clearing account,
Mt question is, Can we able to reclasify the balance to the correct clearing account ? I do not want to reverse the documents , sicne I need to do the paymets again
thanks for your commetnsHi All,
we have activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P " and Switch "MM_SFWS_CI_01 - Enhanced Functions in EhP4 for Applications in Materials Management" using Tcode SFW1. And followed all instructions documented when activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P ". The Busines function is activated to order to clear downpayments at the time of invoice posting in MIRO or MIR7. When I post the invoice in MIRO system is posting 2 indepedent document as below.
1. Invoice posting,
Dr GR/IR
Cr Vendor
2. Downpayment Recovery
Dr Vendor
Cr Vendor with SP GL Indicator "C"
My point is, as per the link http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/48/b42c22e8603095e10000000a421937/frameset.htm, it says "You can use the Down Payment Clearing function to clear down payments that you have posted with reference to a purchase order without going to the relevant financial accounting transactions, directly in logistics invoice verification."
But, in my case, the system is not clearing the downpayment but instead is just posting a Credit memo account entry with SP GL indicator (refer to th Downpayment Entry).
Please advice if SAP is designed to clear the downpayment in LIV or just to post the downpayment recovery entry.
If advice on any corrections to be applied.
Best regards
Abishay Solomon -
F110 cleared but didnt generate checks
Hi friends,
User executed F110, I do not know what happened but it cleared the vendors in the proposal but did not generate checks for them.
Can anyone please tell me what could be the reason for this, and how to resolve it.
Please help.Hi Vijay,
I did check, checklot is maintained properly. and payment program is executed.
Message was edited by:
Shefford William -
How to clear Vendor Debit item Through F110
Hi All,
I have a new requirement,
I have a vendor for which transactions are posted in multiple currecies, like USD & EUR.
I have 2 invoices for this vendor, one is in EUR, and other one is in USD, along with this i have a dabit balance for this vendor which generated through a credit note.
now when iam trying to make the payament for this Vendor thrugh F110, and try to clear the debit amount also, the system is throwing one error message saying that "Enter incoming payment method for the debit amount "(whici is in USD)
Please let me know how to solve this issue
Thanks in advanceHi Robert,
This is the content of SAP Note 164835 as follows:
SAP Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and
invoices
Note Language: English Version: 14 Validity: Valid Since 29.05.2008
Summary
Symptom
When you execute a payment run, you select credit memos and invoices for a
customer or a vendor, but the system does not clear them together. In the
payment (default) log, the system may generate the error message FZ
347:"...none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items".
Other terms
F110, SAPF110S, clearing, FZ 347
Reason and Prerequisites
The items to be cleared do not match in particular fields (see below).
Therefore, they are not paid together.
You can set a payment method only for either outgoing or incoming payments.
This explains the error message FZ 347.
Example
- Payment run is executed with payment method U for outgoing
payment.
- Credit memo is not cleared against invoice.
- Invoice is paid with U.
- Error message FZ 347 is generated for the credit memo.
Solution
The following explains in general how to clear, and describes some options
for eliminating errors. The logic of the grouping in the payment program is
independent of the type of the documents (for example, invoice, credit
memo, down payment, cross-company code posting).
General information
o You can pay open items together using the automatic payment
transactions, but only if certain fields are identical. The
structure ZHLG1 specifies these fields. Important fields are:
- Currency
- Receiver
- Payment method in the item
- Bank details in the item
o Whenever invoices and credit memos are in different payment groups,
you cannot clear them together, even if the credit memo contains an
invoice reference. If you set a payment group for a business
27.12.2010 Page 2 of 4
SAP Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and
invoices
partner (grouping key in the master record), then this is saved in
structure ZHLG1 (field PAYGR). This way the invoice reference in
the credit memo is overridden if they do not belong to the same
payment group.
o Invoice and credit memo must be due at the date of clearing. The
due date of a credit memo without invoice reference (BSEG-REBZG) is
the baseline date for payment (BSEG-ZFBDT), and for a credit memo
with a fixed value date (BSEG-REBZG = 'V'), the due date is
calculated in the same way as for an invoice. For credit memos with
invoice reference, the due date of the invoice applies.
o You cannot clear credit memos and invoices if the payment is
supposed to be made using a payment method set for the POR
procedure.
Invoices are grouped with a POR number with the document number as
an additional part of the grouping key so as to save the individual
payment required for POR payment methods. Invoice-related credit
memos for invoices with POR numbers receive the same grouping key
as the related invoice. This ensures that the clearing is
performed. However, you can no longer make payments using the POR
payment method because this payment method allows only one item to
be paid. However, you can make the payment using a different
payment method.
The POR procedure is only relevant for payment transactions with
the Swiss Postal Service. Consequently, the relevant fields in the
document and in the business partner master record are only of
importance in Switzerland.
What can you do?
o Check the payment methods in the line items (field BSEG-ZLSCH). For
clearing, these must be filled with the same value.
o If you have entered a specific payment method for the items, then
check Customizing for this payment method (transaction FBZP). The
indicator "Single payment for marked item" should not be set there.
o Check the field "Grouping key" in the master record of the business
partner for payment transactions in the company code. If, for
example, there is a grouping set according to assignment number,
then the invoice and credit memo must have the same assignment
number in the business partner line for clearing. Using transaction
OBAP, you can define which fields of the key you want the system to
use for grouping.
o Check the indicator "Pay all items separately" (LFB1- or
KNB1-XPORE) in the master record of the business partner for
payment transactions in the company code. If this field is set,
each open item for this business partner is paid separately.
o If you have set the indicator "Separate payment for each Business
Area" (T042-XGBTR) for the payment program (all company codes) in
Customizing, check the business area in the items. They must match
in this case.
o Check the house bank in the line items (field BSEG-HBKID). The
27.12.2010 Page 3 of 4
SAP Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and
invoices
values must also match for clearing. A document without house bank
can only be cleared with a document with house bank if this house
bank is defined in the master record of the business partner
(LFB1-HBKID or KNB1-HBKID).
Make sure that the house bank from the payment program is filled
for any reset clearing documents (see Note 159607).
o Check the partner bank type in the line items (> Other data > field
BSEG-BVTYP). These values must also match for clearing. You can
specify the partner bank type in the master record of the business
partner for general payment transactions.
o For postings to one-time accounts, the address data is encoded and
saved in field BSEC-EMPFG. The coding routine has been changed in
Release 3.0E. Therefore, if you want to offset documents from an
earlier release against documents from a later release (for
example, after an upgrade) you need to check the contents of this
field. These values must match for clearing. If this is not the
case, the documents from the earlier release need to be reversed
and be posted again. If reversal is not possible, contact SAP
Support.
o If you do not clear using a payment method set with POR procedure
(with or without invoice reference in the credit memo), then check
the contents of the fields BSEG-ESRNR, BSEG-ESRRE and BSEG-ESRPZ.
They must not be filled if you do not enter a payment method in the
item.
o If you set a separate payment for each payment reference (for
example separated by a CID number in Norway or reference number in
Finland) (FBZP > Paying Company Codes > field T042B-XKIDS), then
the items for a clearing in field BSEG-KIDNO must be the same. Note
that the Customizing setting (T042B-XKIDS) is effective only if
vendors are involved in the payments. When you separate the
payments by payment reference, also take into account that no
outgoing payment can be generated for a payment reference for which
only credit memos exist.
o Check the structure ZHLG1 in your system. If you have inserted
additional fields there, the line items must also match in these
fields. Contact your consultant.
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 30.05.2008 10:55:56
Master Language: German
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Consulting
Primary Component: FI-AP-AP-B Payment Progam / Payment transfer
(DE, JP, US)
Secondary Components:
27.12.2010 Page 4 of 4
SAP Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and
invoices
RE-RT Rental
The Note is release-independent
Related Notes
Number Short Text
1084325 FSCM-BD: Payment method for invoice-related credit memo II
305414 F110: Unintelligible grouping of documents
197626 Partner bank category in RAs and payment program
159607 F110: Reset clearing is not offset against
143311 F110:Incorr.due date for cred.memo w/ fix.val.date
109233 F110: message FZ347 or several payment documents
86578 Guidelines for F110 Payment Program (W/Check mgmt)
33288 Payment methods for rental agreement
22856 Customer credit memos are not paid
20484 Payment program does not clear due items
4904 Credit memo clearing or down pmnt clearing for POR -
Automatic Payments-Offsetting Downpayments with related Goods Receipt-ECC6
Dear all,
We are using automatic payments (faa0) and creating a payment proposal to settle an invoice that has a downpayment posted for the same purchase order. The purchase order has a goods receipt posted against it.
We are on version ERP2005 (ECC6) and use Funds Management (BCS). New functionality in Funds Management allows for the offsetting(clearing) of the downpayment by the goods receipt value. For example:
You have created a purchase order for $200.
You have created a down payment for $100 as below.
Credit the bank account $100-
Debit the vendor special G/L $100
You then create a GR for $50. If this is a valuated GR and if you are using this feature, you get an additional posting like below in addition to the standard GR lines.
Credit the vendor special G/L $50-
Debit the vendor account $50
The problem we are experiencing is when we have to perform the automatic payment. The payment proposal is picking up the downpayment and determines that it needs to be settled but then generates the following message:
Message no. FZ347 - ...none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items
In analysing the error message we did the following:
1) Looked at remedies for customising settings for payment methods and payment groupings as per OSS note 164835 - F110 Clearing Credit Memos and Invoices - none of the remedies applied
2) Applied a test on a downpayment with no goods receipt - The payment proposal was able to process downpayment and net it off against the invoice and therefore the problem solely relates to this specific scenario and not all downpayments.
My question is whether anyone has managed to successfully create the payment proposal for the scenario described above and how they achieved it?
Thanks.
Regards,
ShaunHi,
500000*9 is GR and 51*0020205 is IR
GR/IR Commitment item- Find in the atttachment
OF29-Find in the attachment.
Thanks. -
Payment proposal not picking up all documents
We have several credit memos for one vendor that are not picked up by the payment proposal run even though their due dates are within the payment run. These credit memos are manually created through FB60 and not through MIRO. In the payment proposal, the error log says "due items with currency USD, pmt method W - items total is >0". The same payment proposal picked up all other invoices (for the same vendor) correctly. These invoices have the same payment method as the credit memos and the credit memo due dates are prior to the payment date.
If anybody can point me in the right direction as to what to look for, I'd appreciate it.
rgds,
LannyHi Ruslim,
Please refer below OSS notes:
Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and invoices
Hope this helps.
Pls assign points as way to say thanks -
F110 doesn't clear vendor open items. Interad it creates one more entry.
Hi!
This is the problem I have. I run F110, proposal is great, payment is great, check is printer. Check in FCHR is created.
I go back to FBL1N - open item is still there! More that that - another open item with document type - ZP is there, but it showed up as additional open item - not clearing item. When I click on it - accounting document shows me : Clearing date 12/03/2008 - and same document number.
Why doesn't it clear it and it still says OVERDUE???
And of course, I can not post check cashed because of that in FCHR.
Please let me know.
Thanks!!!!!Hi,
In FBZP transaction code while configuring The Automatic Outgoing payment, In Payment methods in country Tab under posting control What are document type you have defined for
Document type for Payment and Clearing document type ? generally it should be same , normally KZ
The payment for which F110 was executed , Is it a down payment to vendors?
Pleease Check it.
With Regards,
Sudipto -
F110- not able to clear the debit and credit entry with the same reference
Hi,
I am not able to clear the debit and credit entry with the same reference in F110 even after having the payment terms as immediate payment, payment method is maintained in document no and vendor master data. Both debit and credit entry is appearing in FBL1N as an open item but it is not appearing in F110.
In Log message appear as 8 days grace period is existing whereas as payment term is just 0001- immediate payment.
Kindly advice me what could be wrong.
Thanks,
Manya.Hi,
Credit and debit balance in vendor account are not cleared automatically when only vendor line item has payment method and credit memo has not payment method. Also when there is not payment method maintained in vendor master data.
In such case to avoid payment to vendor when vendor has debit balance we perform debit balance check.
In second scenario when u2018individual paymentu2019 is selected in vendor master data vendor invoice and credit memo are not cleared automatically in F110.
To setoff vendor credit and debit balance in F110 you to uncheck u2018individual paymentu2019 check in vendor master data > company code data > payment data.
Thanks!
Raju -
Clear one time customer against normal vendor in F110
Hi Gurus,
I am trying to see if it is possible to clear one time customer against normal vendor in F110.
Customer and vendor have been linked and clearing with customer/vendor have been ticked.
Customer invoice of $100 and vendor invoice of $150 have been posted.
In F110 proposal, the two entries appears as separate lines. The customer invoice has a red icon and it says that debit balance is not possible for payment.
What are the matching criteria for customer and vendor transactions in F110?
I suspect it is caused by different payment recipient. The customer transaction took the customer name as payment recipient (e.g. ABC Coy - 00000001 which we have seen often for one time customers/vendors) I entered during invoicing. It's blank for the vendor transaction.
Putting aside the reason why we are not using a normal customer, anybody has any ideas?
Thanks.Hi,
Do you able to find a solution for your requirement.
My business need is also similar to your. If you have got a workaround,can you kindly share it.
Regards,
Maybe you are looking for
-
A Case Study Question in the Use of Stills with Final Cut Pro
Believe it or not, for the last week I have been reading endlessly about pixels, resolution, aspect ratio, Photoshop resizing, the bloody battle over the usefulness of the term "dpi" in video discussions, and generally about what one should do in ord
-
We sell a lot of packages. We are looking for a way to display the products that are included in the packages when folks create a revenue record for the top level item. So if they add part A to a revenue record, since parts 1, 2, and 3 are included w
-
I'm currently updating the 'OS X Yosemite v10.10.3 Update' and it's taking over 10 hours! Has anyone else had this experience?
-
I can't join LAP to WLC 5508 in difference subnet
i can't join LAP to WLC in difference subnet now i create 2 interface [management / ap-manager] management : 192.168.1.1 / 24 ap-manager : 192.168.1.2 / 24 vlan 10 ap-manager2 : 192.168.2.2 / 24 vlan 11 ap-manager3 : 192.168.3.2 / 24 vlan 12 connect
-
what happens when a app like netflix is no longer compatible with my ipod if i update apps will it not work?