Payment proposal not picking up all documents

We have several credit memos for one vendor that are not picked up by the payment proposal run even though their due dates are within the payment run. These credit memos are manually created through FB60 and not through MIRO. In the payment proposal, the error log says "due items with currency USD, pmt method W - items total is >0". The same payment proposal picked up all other invoices (for the same vendor) correctly. These invoices have the same payment method as the credit memos and the credit memo due dates are prior to the payment date.
If anybody can point me in the right direction as to what to look for, I'd appreciate it.
rgds,
Lanny

Hi Ruslim,
Please refer below OSS notes:
Note 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and invoices
Hope this helps.
Pls assign points as way to say thanks

Similar Messages

Revaluation not picking up all documents

Hi
The revaluation program is not picking up all foreign currency GRIR documents. I've checked and the exchange rates are different and the items are open, but when we run the revaluation program it skips certain documents. Has anyone ever come accross this issue?
Thanks

I think that you posted this on the wrong forum. This is the asset accounting forum. Revaluation usually refers to the revaluation of assets. I think that you are asking about currency revaluations. You shold post your question in the correct forum.

Payment proposal not generated throgh f110

Hi FI Gurus,
My problem will understand with the following scenario:
I have one vendor having debit balance of 5000 and have many debit and credit trsanction including down payment of 6000.
I haven't clear down payment through F-54.
I executed f110, after payment proposal saving, I want to open to see payment proposal list but it was throwing message like " Company codes xxx/xxxx do not appear in proposal 21.12.2009 xxxx; correct".
Could you tell me reason why payment proposal not generated. Or this may be because of overall this vendor has debit balance.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Prakash

Hi,
Some times this message comes if vendor or document (intend to clear) is locked under some other payment proposal.
I would suggest check previously created payment runs and find out where the proposal run is not complete successfully.
If you find any such entry then ask user either to complete this run or delete the proposal then parameters. Later create a fresh proposal & payment run.
Please let me know if it helps!!
Regards,

Reply all not picking up all email addresses

On a mail list email when I hit "Reply All" Mail app does not pick up all email addresses when composing a response to a non subscribed user. This also happens when using web mail in Safari. No problems on iMac.

last step on the process is a factory restore through itunes to see if its a software glitch, if that doesnt solve it, you iphone may need service
iTunes: Restoring iOS software

AP - Payment Process not picking up Invoices

Hi All,
I am running the payment process from AP(Payments Manager).I have created 5 Invoices on 12-Dec-2013 and have attached the Pay Group. Once i run the payment process with the pay group none of my invoices has been picked up for processing.I have given the date range from 01-Dec-2013 to 13-Dec-2013
Please help i need close this task ASAP
Regards

Hi,
What are the payment terms on the invoices? If these are not IMMEDIATE, and the payment is not due, the system would not pick them up until they are due.
What is the payment method on the invoice and in the PPR? Are you running the PPR for electronically paid invoices but the invoices are set to be paid by check?
Are there any holds on the suppliers you are trying to pay?
What are the other parameters you gave when running the PPR? It helps to check those against the invoice to make sure they would qualify.
Information about the pararameters you are using and one of the invoices to be selected would be helpful.
Cheryl

F110 AUTOMATIC PAYMENT PROGRAM NOT PICKING PAYMENT METHOD

hi guru's
F110 - Running payment program proposal list going to exeption list , House bank not picking up from VENDOR master. if not maintaing house bank in vendor master
proposal list is coming but 2nd house bank picking but i need 1 house bank. i maintained ranking order in FBZP.
pls suggest me this issue.
raj.

Hi,
I had an other problem with payment methods and in that case it was important how you fill it in the vendor and in the payment run. prhaps this helps you to found a solution or to understand how it is working
I have set-up a new payment method "E" for splitting euro payments under EUR 50,000 (K is for the other and non iban payments)
For this I have made the following settings in the Bank determination:
PM Rank order House bank
E 1 733BE
K 2 733BE
In the vendor masterdata I will fill in EK (to make it easy for users)
When I run the payment method with KE the system is using K and not E. when I fill in EK the IBAN payments are going with E and and the other one's with K what is correct.
Why is the Rank order not working for this? (look first to E and when E is not permitted go use K)
Paul

F110 PAYMENT RUN NOT PICKING UP LINE ITEMS

Hi Everyone,
We use the APP functionality to pay customers credit memo. so when running F110, we indicate the credit memo document number in the further selection criteria in F110. It has always been working fine, but some customer that we have paid before, we ran F110 and it cleared some documents but did not clear the others. The line item is sitting in the customers account correctly and the payment terms is the one we have always used (2% 15 days net 30days).
What do you think i can check againg

hi Adeola,
See for running the F110 the payment must be overdue then only can able to run the APP run.
As you have mentioned in ur seetings only that the payment terms is set for 30 days.
As this payments is not yet overdue.
If you Run after 30 days then you can run the Payment run.
Please let me know, is this helpfull to u.....
Regards
Ranjit

Foreign Currency Payments are not Picking up Exchnage Rates

Hi,
We are on R12.0.6 and while entering foreign currency payments the system is not picking up the exchange rate. It is only allowing us to enter USER exchange rate. The field of exchange rate on Payment form is greyed out and not showing anything.
We have checked the rates and these are present in system. The same rates are picked up by invoice entry screens but for payments it gives us no exchange rate found.
Has anyone faced this problem.

Well, it seems that the "Exchange Rate" field on the Payment form populates when the user selects the Bank Account before the Payment Date field. Previously we were entering the information first in the Payment Date field and than selecting the Bank Account. This was preventing the Exchange Rate field from being populated with the rate.
I just changed the order of the entry and it worked perfectly. Now first we select the bank from which payment is going to take take place and than the date, and the exchange rate is automatically picked up from the rates table.

Automatic Payment program not picking vendors

Hi
On Monday,user run F110, some vendors are not picked up for payment. When I've checked this vendor master data payment terms 60 days (Net due date from Doc.date) is mentioned. These vendors fall in to due next 06/22/2008.But they are in open items only. The payment method is assigned correctly, no changes were done for past 3/4 months.
My doubt is Why these are not picked for payment when they are in Open Item in this payment run ?
Can any one tell me when will these vendors can be picked up for payment ? Do they complete the total period as per payment terms assignement ?
Regards
Madan

Hi
I've checked the next p/date, it is 06/19/2008 which is less than due date (06/22/2008).
Is it the reason for not picking ? If I want this vendor to be picked up for payment, Shall I run this once again by giving more than due date like 06/24/2008 ?
I've checked other vendors also, they fall under due date and got picked up.
I appreciate your kind response and will award you the points soon..
Regards
Madan

"Restore last view settings when reopening documents" option not working with all documents

Said option (found under Edit/Preferences, category Documents), which works like an automatic bookmark in that it takes you back to the same place you were at when you last closed a document, is very useful, but apparently doesn't work with *all* documents.
- Does anyone know what determines whether a given document works with this option or not?
- Is this by design or a bug? A matter of PDF format version?
- Is there a way to work around the problem?
I've compared two documents, only one of which works with the option, to determine what the relevant difference may be, and found two suspects (under File/Properties): the PDF version (1.5 in the document that works, 1.4 in the one that doesn't), and 'Fast Web View' ('yes' in the document that works, 'no' in the one that doesn't).
Thanks,
Michael

This seems to be a problem with some PDF files.
Suggested workaround: If the PDF you have allows "Save As", then try save-as to a new file. The "Restore last view settings when reopening documents" option should then work as expected (in the new file).
(Original post: Restore last view setting not working in version XI)

PO down payment is not picking FI substitution rule.

Hi All,
We have an issue with PO down payment and clearing. We have a
substitution rule on line item level as per company code were default profit
center is set. But while doing ME2DP, profit center is picking from PO account
assignment and overriding our substitution rule. We did try with complete
document substitution rule also but not worked.
Clearing of the pre-payment is deriving the profit center of
the account assignment on the PO, overriding our profit center substitution.
This is only happening with PO down payment. Please let me
know any solution.

Hi Rakesh
If the Down payment GL you are referring to is a Balance sheet account, your substitution should work.. How have you written your substitution? Can you give a screen shot?
But if you are referring to the Down Payment Cost Element assigned against your Controlling area, system is correct... For a cost element, PC is always derived from the associated CO object
br, Ajay M

Data Merge not picking up all data fields

Hi,
I've been having a problem, posted here: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1217090
Essentially, I have been using the script 'CSV2Tables' to prepopulate simple 2 column tables with information drawn from a CSV data source.
The tables consist of a title, and a block of information about that specific subject. Many of the blocks of information I am importing also contain data tags (<<DataTag>>)
The plan is to use CSV2Tables to populate the tables, then change data source and run a normal ID Data Merge to replace all of the <<tags>> within the tables with information from a second CSV data source.
The problem is, CSV2Tables is importing the data and prepopulating the tables just fine, but the data tags that are found within each body of text are being picked up as plain text (as Peter Spier has pointed out, they are being drawn from a plain text stream rather than being dragged from the Mail Merge panel) so when I try to run the ID Mail Merge, none of the fields are found within my document.
My question is - is there a method, or script available out there that can essentially do a Find/Change within a document, and replace plain text that appears like this <<PlainText>> with a Data Tag that is recognised by ID, which will allow me to run a Data Merge?
I have been told to check out some of the commercial plugins available out there, but registering and setting up demo's would require me to contact our IT provider for each, and that would be an exhaustive process.
Any help is much appreciated.

Hi,
is modyfied
Array.prototype.find = function (string) {
    for (var s = 0; s < this.length; s++)
        if (this[s] == string) return s;
        return -1;
var mFrames, mFile, mDoc, mFields, mFieldsNames, mStory,
     mPlainTxt, mNameToCompare, mField_ID;
// edit this with proper .csv path
mFile = File(Folder.myDocuments + "/" + "Merge.csv");
mDoc = app.activeDocument;
mDoc.dataMergeProperties.selectDataSource(mFile);
mFields = mDoc.dataMergeProperties.dataMergeFields;
mFieldsNames = mFields.everyItem().fieldName;
mFrames = mDoc.textFrames.everyItem().getElements();
for (var i = 0; i < mFrames.length; i ++) {
    if (!mFrames[i].name.match(/TF\d*$/) ) continue;
    // script assumes a targered text boxes are named like: TF1, TF2...
     // (TF plus any integer) or just TF (no integer)
    // - they could have the same name
    // any other name exludes frame from this loop
    mStory = mFrames[i].parentStory;
    app.findGrepPreferences = null;
    app.findGrepPreferences.findWhat = "<<.+?>>";
    mPlainTxt = mStory.findGrep(true);
    for (var k = 0; k < mPlainTxt.length; k++) {
        mNameToCompare = mPlainTxt[k].contents.slice(2,-2);
        mField_ID = mFieldsNames.find(mNameToCompare);
        if (mField_ID > -1) {
              mField = mFields[mField_ID];
            mDoc.dataMergeTextPlaceholders.add (
                mStory,
                mPlainTxt[k].insertionPoints[0],
                mField
        mPlainTxt[k].remove();
script assumes a targered text boxes are named like:
TF1, TF2... (TF plus any integer) or just TF (no integer) -
- they could have the same name.
Jarek

Payment advices not picking accounting clerk phone number and fax number.

Hi,
We have executed payment program and payment advices got generated. But in the output it is printing everthing i.e accounting clerk name, vendor number and amount. But it is not filling the accounting clerk phone number and fax number even though we have maintained it in our customized transaction code. Will this values in the payment advices will be picked up from standard t.code OB05, there we don't have option to give these two values.
Can anyboday help me on this.
Regards,
Sree

goto accunt groups with screen layout,
after creating the group or existing group, double click on account management, in payment transactions make the required fields are required.
regards,

Udev/dmraid not picking up all partitions of a fake RAID setup!

Hey all. I've been having a problem with my RAID setup in Arch. At first Arch wasn't picking up a partition on one of my arrays, (a single large NTFS partition on a 2TB array between two 1TB drives) but after re-creating the RAID array in the Intel Storage Manager I have a different problem. Arch now find the single large partition, but now /dev/mapper isn't populated with the other two partitions on the other array that my operating systems are on (Arch and Windows), when it used to just fine! The only thing I changed was re-creating the partition table on the other array, so I don't know what's going on.
Upon trying to boot, GRUB comes back with the error described on the wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/In … oot_device
However I can't boot into the fallback image either! This means that I can't apply the fix as described in the wiki.
I'm starting to think there is a limitation in Arch where it can only handle a certain number of mapper devices (seems to be 3), or maybe it only detects the partitions on the first detected array? Now that I recreated the partition table on the larger array, it seems like that's the array that's detected first in both a GParted live session and Arch. But in a live GParted session, /dev/mapper was fully populated with all of my disks and partitions... so why is it that Arch can only find the partitions on one of the RAID arrays?
If you guys need any additional information just let me know... I really want to get my Arch setup up and working so I don't have to use Windows all that often (only games that don't work well in Wine).

Please do not crosspost. Follow forum rules.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=124247
Closing..

Lookout 6.1 Backup server not picking up all drivers for client links

We are running Lookout 6.1. We have a server and four clients, with one fo the clients acting as the backup server when the server goes down. We have been making loads of changes lately and decided to test by closing lookout on the server and we found the backup seemed to successfully pick up control, but while it had items we had created/ modified (buttons for modbus commands and feedback information from drives), it did not have the connection to the linked drives for command and feddback. while it was missing recent items it still had items present from years past that did function and feedback correctly, all things being on the same TCP/IP network. it seems we may not have all the correct info being backed up in a timely manner to the correct place on the backup server. Is the SQL file in the lookout\database folder an important part of this? can i simply shut down SQL processes via task manager and then copy the 1.15GB sql file over top of the 850MB sql file on the backup server? when instructed to have a COPY of the L4P primary file from the server computer in the standby computer, which one could it be. there are several, and the dates seem to be older. i am sure there is more...

The hypertrend use Citadel service to transfer the data between computer, while the live data is different, so your problem is probably in networking setting or firewall.
If you have firewall on either computer, follow these KBs.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/0D7B86F4B4D19A5E86256F9A006EECB1?OpenDocument
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/8AE45BBFA1D7025E862570F200642FD8?OpenDocument
Lookout client software doesn't install MAX.exe, but if you have MAX.exe on the client computer, you can use MAX to check the connection. In MAX, try to view the remote trace.
You can also use the NI Hypertrend ActiveX object to check the connection. Create a client process with just a NI Hypertrend ActiveX object. Move it to client computer. Edit its properties and add a trace, then try to view the remote trace. See the attached screenshot. If the Citadel communication has problem, you will not see the database or the trace.
The ActiveX object doesn't fix the problem, but can tell you whether the remote connection is good or not.
Message Edited by Ryan.S on 11-14-2008 03:49 AM
Ryan Shi
National Instruments
Attachments:
1.JPG ‏71 KB

Payment proposal not picking up all documents

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for