F110 paymnet proposal - Deletion Issue

Hi,
I have run F110. Du to paymnet method missing the Paymnet run executed but didnt mak any paymnets.
NOw I want to delete the paymnet proposal .
It does not allow me to delete .
So I cant create a new paymnet proposal for the same record.
The Vendor OI is still there - ie no postings.
Basically how to delete the paymnet run ?
Thanks,
Sekar.P

Hi,
First option ~
Edit the payment proposal ~ Double-click on the line item and choose 'Reallocate' option to assign the payment method ~ Save your proposal ~ Execute the payment run..... this option can help you without deleting the proposal or payment run.
Second option ~
In the initial screen of the relevant payment run ID (t.code: F110), go to Menu ~ Edit ~ Proposal ~ Delete. This will help you in deleting a proposal and enter the paremeters again. In turn, you will be able to create a new proposal and execute the payment run.
Cheers.

Similar Messages

Open items (F110 payment proposal)

Hi All,
Can someone clarify what are open items
1: invoices that are not cleared
2: credit memos
3:credit memos applied to an invoice
4:residuals
(When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items)
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's?
Any help appreciated
Thanks,
Prashanth

1: invoices that are not cleared - YES
2: credit memos - YES, if not cleared against any invoice
3:credit memos applied to an invoice - YES
4:residuals - once you do the payment system create new invoice for balance , that will open item
When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items - if not cleared against any invoice that will come under open item list.
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's? - YES, which are in red , are called as open items...all the items in open will come in F110 proposal run
VVR

Restrict user from deleting issued component in Tcode CN22

1) In T Code - CN22 user can delete issued components ( thru movt type - 281 ) how this can be restricted .
2) Deletion indicator for deleted component not seen in CN22.
Pls tell me what are the settings required to set deleted component indicator on.

Hi,
In OPSG u can restrict deletion of withdrawn material component as error....

Delete Issue with 1:M Relationship.

We had following Relationship M-M relation mapped through a cross Reference Table.
Table Cust(customer Table), AddrXRef (XRef table), Addr(Address)
Relationship is as follows.
Cust - > AddrXRef 1-M Privatly Owned
AddrXRef -> Cust 1-1
Addr -> AddrXRef 1-M Privatly Owned
AddrXRef -> Addr 1-1
Here the Sittuation we have a use case where two row in AddrXRef table which
share the the same Addr Row for Same Customer. We need to update one of
the AddrXRef row to association with a New Addr row.
We tried create a new instance for instance of Addr Object and associating it
to existing AddrXRef instance.(Both Forward and Back Refrence for Add ->AddrXRef)
The behaviour we see is instance of issue update on AddrXRef table and Insert of new row in Addr table. We see two insert one of new Addr row and one for AddrXRef.
and delete issue for AddrXRef row and old Addr row which is shared with other AddrXRef row.
sample code for method.
     public void validatePackageSentAddress()
CustomerAddress homeAddress = getHomeAddress();
CustomerAddress pkgSentAddress = getPackageSentAddress();
if ( pkgSentAddress != null && homeAddress != null &&
          pkgSentAddress.getDelegate() != null &&
          pkgSentAddress.getAddrUniqNum() != null
          && pkgSentAddress.getAddrUniqNum().equals(homeAddress.getAddrUniqNum()) )
     CustomerAddrXRefBO pkgSentAddrXRefBo = pkgSentAddress.getDelegate();
     CustomerAddressBO newAddrBo = new CustomerAddressBO();
     // Associated new CustAddressBo instance pkgsendAddrXRefBo
     //     1) reference the new Addr from AddrXRef for PkgSent
     // Set from Forward and Back reference
     pkgSentAddrXRefBo.setCustomerAddress(newAddrBo);
     newAddrBo.addCustomerAddrXRef(pkgSentAddrXRefBo);
     // Only specific attribute need to be copied for PackageSent Address
     pkgSentAddress.setCityName(homeAddress.getCityName());
     pkgSentAddress.setCountryDescText(homeAddress.getCountryDescText());
     pkgSentAddress.setCountyDescText(homeAddress.getCountyDescText());
     pkgSentAddress.setStateCd(homeAddress.getStateCd());
     pkgSentAddress.setStreetNum(homeAddress.getStreetNum());
     pkgSentAddress.setStreetName(homeAddress.getStreetName());
     pkgSentAddress.setResidencyTypeCd(homeAddress.getResidencyTypeCd());
     pkgSentAddress.setBldgName(homeAddress.getBldgName());
Message was edited by:
user462895

The problem is that by making the AddrXRef privately owned it cannot be reparented. Once it is removed from it's parent's list (either one) it will be deleted. To achieve what you're trying to do you'll need to delete the old incorrect AddrXRef and replace it with a new correct one.
From the TopLink Developer's Guide[1]:
When you tell TopLink that a relationship is privately owned, you are specifying that:
* If the source of a privately owned relationship is deleted, then delete the target.
* If you remove the reference to a target from a source, then delete the target.
--Shaun
[1] http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/doc/10131/main/_html/uowbas007.htm#i1134011

Run F110 Payment Proposal in Custom Z Report

Hi Folks,
I have a requirement to run payment proposal part of the F110 transaction from a Z program without having to create a payment proposal.
It's a little tricky to explain so I will try to say it in these terms:
My desired output is the "Display Payment Proposal: Payments" table that can be viewed by clicking Display Proposal button in F110.
My desired input is Company Code, Pament Methods, Next Payment Date and the list of Vendors (i.e. the values that are entered when creating the payment parameters.)
So, is this achieve able without going through tons of F110 code to replicate the functionality.
Many thanks for any help,
Colm

I created a function module to do the work. Hopefully somone finds it useful
FUNCTION z_run_dummy_pay_proposal.
*"*"Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(I_LAUFD) TYPE F110V-LAUFD
*"     REFERENCE(I_ZWELS) TYPE F110V-ZWELS
*"     REFERENCE(I_NEDAT) TYPE F110V-NEDAT
*"     REFERENCE(I_LAUFI) TYPE F110V-LAUFI
*" EXPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(EXCEPTION) TYPE CHAR255
*" CHANGING
*"     REFERENCE(T_LIFNR) TYPE ZTT_LIFNR
*"     REFERENCE(T_BUKRS) TYPE ZTT_BUKRS
*"     REFERENCE(T_REGUH) TYPE ZTT_REGUH
*"     REFERENCE(T_REGUP) TYPE ZTT_REGUP
*"     REFERENCE(T_BSIK) TYPE ZTT_BSIK
DATA: ls_rfdt TYPE rfdt, "Cluster Table that stores the Payment Parameters
        lv_seconds TYPE i, "Seconds used to control the wait time
        ls_lifnr TYPE lifnr,
        ls_bukrs TYPE bukrs.
*RFTD table is the parameter cluster table for F110 amoung others
CONSTANTS: lc_relid TYPE rfdt-relid VALUE 'FB', "CHAR02 data element for SYST from RFDT table
             lc_parm TYPE c LENGTH 4 VALUE 'PARM', "Constant value to pass into the RFDT table
             lc_f110 TYPE c LENGTH 4 VALUE 'F110'. "Constant value to pass into the RFDT table
*The values are needed to store the parameters correctly in the Parameter Cluster Table
f110v-laufd = i_laufd.
f110v-laufi = i_laufi.
f110c-budat = i_laufd.
f110c-grdat = i_laufd.
rfdt-mandt = sy-mandt.
rfdt-relid = lc_relid.
CONCATENATE lc_f110 i_laufd i_laufi lc_parm INTO rfdt-srtfd.
f110id-progr = lc_f110.
f110id-laufd = i_laufd.
f110id-laufi = i_laufi.
f110id-objkt = lc_parm.
*Build up the Vendors that are being stored in the parameters
LOOP AT t_lifnr INTO ls_lifnr.
    r_lifnr-sign = 'I'.
    r_lifnr-option = 'EQ'.
    r_lifnr-low = ls_lifnr.
    APPEND r_lifnr.
ENDLOOP.
*Build up the Company Codes that are being stored in the parameters
LOOP AT t_bukrs INTO ls_bukrs.
    fkttab-bugrp = sy-tabix.
    fkttab-zwels = i_zwels.
    fkttab-nedat = i_nedat.
    fkttab-bukls = ls_bukrs.
    fkttab-xpruf = 'X'.
*To match the SAP standard I put in 6 blank lines
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT fkttab WHERE bugrp IS NOT INITIAL.
    buktab-bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
    buktab-bugrp = fkttab-bugrp.
    SELECT SINGLE land1
      FROM t001
      INTO buktab-land1
      WHERE bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
    SELECT SINGLE zbukr
      FROM t042
      INTO buktab-zbukr
      WHERE bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
    APPEND buktab.
ENDLOOP.
*Use the SAP standard to format the Vendors
PERFORM selektion_lifnr.
*Create the Payment Parameters
PERFORM sichern.
*Commit the work and wait for the Payment Parameters to be written to the database
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
*Wait up to 4 minutes for the Payment Parameters to be created, if they aren't after
*4 minutes raise an exception
CLEAR lv_seconds.
DO 240 TIMES.
    SELECT SINGLE *
      FROM rfdt
      INTO ls_rfdt
      WHERE relid = lc_relid
      AND srtfd = rfdt-srtfd.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      EXIT.
    ELSE.
      WAIT UP TO 1 SECONDS.
      lv_seconds = lv_seconds + 1.
      IF lv_seconds = 240.
        exception = 'parameter_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDDO.
*Once the payment parameters have been created we can create a payment proposal
CALL FUNCTION 'SCHEDULE_PAYMENT_PROPOSAL'
    EXPORTING
      i_laufd           = i_laufd
      i_laufi           = i_laufi
      i_xstrf           = 'X' "Create immediatly
    EXCEPTIONS
      startdate_wrong   = 1
      parameters_missed = 2
      lock_failed       = 3
      job_open_failed   = 4
      job_close_failed = 5
      OTHERS            = 6.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    exception = 'proposal_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
*Trigger the Job
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
*Clear out the tables that are used to store the cluster table
*values for the parameters
REFRESH: buktab, fkttab, slktab, sldtab, trctab, usrtab,
           faetab, jobtab.
CLEAR:   buktab, fkttab, slktab, sldtab, trctab, usrtab,
           faetab, jobtab, f110c, trcopt, f110versionpar.
*Import the Payment Parameters Values
IMPORT buktab fkttab slktab sldtab trctab usrtab
         faetab jobtab f110c trcopt f110versionpar
         FROM DATABASE rfdt(fb) ID f110id.
*Check to see has the job finished
CLEAR lv_seconds.
DO 240 TIMES.
    READ TABLE jobtab INDEX 1.
    SELECT SINGLE *
      FROM tbtco
      WHERE jobname = jobtab-jobname
      AND jobcount = jobtab-jobcount
      AND status = 'F'.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      EXIT.
    ELSE.
      WAIT UP TO 1 SECONDS.
      lv_seconds = lv_seconds + 1.
      IF lv_seconds = 240.
        exception = 'proposal_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDDO.
*Store the Payment Proposal Header Values
SELECT *
    FROM reguh
    INTO TABLE t_reguh
    WHERE laufd = i_laufd
    AND laufi = i_laufi.
*Delete the values where no payment will be made
DELETE t_reguh WHERE vblnr IS INITIAL.
*Store the Payment Proposal Line Item Values
SELECT *
    FROM regup
    INTO TABLE t_regup
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_reguh
    WHERE laufd = t_reguh-laufd
AND laufi = t_reguh-laufi
AND xvorl = t_reguh-xvorl
AND zbukr = t_reguh-zbukr
AND lifnr = t_reguh-lifnr
AND kunnr = t_reguh-kunnr
AND empfg = t_reguh-empfg
AND vblnr = t_reguh-vblnr.
*Get the relevant Outstanding Payment to Vendors Values
SELECT *
    FROM bsik
    INTO TABLE t_bsik
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_regup
    WHERE bukrs = t_regup-bukrs
AND lifnr = t_regup-lifnr
AND umsks = t_regup-umsks
AND umskz = t_regup-umskz
AND zuonr = t_regup-zuonr
AND gjahr = t_regup-gjahr
AND belnr = t_regup-belnr
AND buzei = t_regup-buzei.
*Delete the Payment Proposal
CALL FUNCTION 'DELETE_PAYMENT_PROPOSAL'
    EXPORTING
      date                = i_laufd
      identification      = i_laufi
    EXCEPTIONS
      abnormal_end        = 1
      no_delete_authority = 2
      OTHERS              = 3.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    exception = 'proposal_delete_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
*Delete the Payment Parameters
CALL FUNCTION 'DELETE_PAYMENT_PARAMETERS'
    EXPORTING
      i_laufd           = i_laufd
      i_laufi           = i_laufi
      i_inter           = space
    EXCEPTIONS
      no_authority      = 1
      parameters_missed = 2
      wrong_status      = 3
      OTHERS            = 4.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    exception = 'parameter_delete_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
ENDFUNCTION.
Edited by: Colm Gavin on Apr 15, 2011 12:22 PM

BTE F110 Edit Proposal

Guys,
I found the BTE 00002105 for the creation of the proposal in t-code F110. But the same BTE doesn't work for the Edit Proposal.
I will need a BTE for editig the proposal (when clicking on the save button).
Dou you know if there's any?
Thanks!

Hi Matias,
Mentioned below are the list of BTE for dunning:
00001020     DUNNING: Following reading, prior to printing
00001030     DUNNING: Determine form
00001040     DUNNING: Determine output device
00001050     DUNNING: Read additional fields for MHNK
00001051     DUNNING: Read additional fields for MHND (BSID)
00001052     DUNNING: Read additional fiels for MHND (BSIK)
00001053     DUNNING: Set one time account
00001060     DUNNING: Dunning check MHND
00001061     DUNNING: Delete indicator MHND
00001070     DUNNING: Interest determination MHND
00001071     DUNNING: Calculate charges (MHNK)
Check which one will be helpful for you. For more information of the indvidual read the documentation of the BTE.
Regards
Dillip

Open Items run (F110 payment proposal)

Hi All,
Can someone please help me with a problem that I am facing when running F110.
We pay our vendors through F110 but also we have customers who we need to issue dividend equity check and their loan payout's. So when I do FB75 and create a credit note for customer and than I go FBL5N I see it there with other open invoices. Than I go to F110 and do a payment run and it creates a check for the difference. I don't want that to happen, I want the check issued for the credit amount that I posted in FB75. Is there any way I can print checks for the credit memos only and not mess with the customer open invoices. Please help if you know how to fix this problem. Thank you in advance for your help.
Happy Holidays!
Monika

You have a couple of options (select whichever is possible for your current system config):
First, you can specify different payment methods in cust. invoices and cust. credit memos. Then, in F110, specify only the cust. credit memo payment method, and the system should pick up only the credit memos.
Secondly, if the payment methods can't be different for both the document types, and if there are not too many invoices open, you can block all the open invoices. This way, F110 will not process the invoices with the credit memos.
Thirdly, there is a checkbox in the cust. master data (Company Code Data - Payment transactions) named "Single payment". Place your cursor on it, and hit <F1>. SAP says that "If this indicator is set, every customer/vendor open item is paid separately during automatic payment transactions. This means that open items are not grouped together for payment."
Fourthly, you can define Payment Groupings (T.Code OBAP).
IMG path Fin. Acctg. --> AR and AP --> Buss. Trans. --> Outgoing Payments --> Autom. Outgoing Payments --> Payment Method / Bank Selection for Payment Prog. --> Define Payment Groupings.
You can then specify these groupings in the cust. master screen (Company Code Data - Payment transactions) using field "Grouping Key".
Remember to assign points if found useful.
Regards,
Gulshan

Icloud data back up delete issue

Hi! I've recently bought an iphone5 and have restored it from icloud.
The problem I have now is that i cannot delete the back up data.
I have 3 back up data showing
(1) My old iphone
(2) My new iphone
(3) My ipad.
I can delete items 2 and 3 and not (1) My old iphone data. I keep geting the message "cannot delete data as it'sin use".
I have tried everything from turning Wifi off, stoping icloud back ups, nothing sems to work!
Please help!!!!!

Hi, El P.
You wrote: "I am thinking this is a minimal way to save my important data and be able to re-boot if I have an issue with the hard drive. Any thoughts? El P"Well, if your hard drive fails, you're not going to be able to re-boot. If that's a risk you're prepared to live with, then what you're doing is adequate, but minimal.
FireWire drives are available at far more reasonable prices than $200. For example, OWC's Neptune series starts at $93.99 plus shipping. Their drives include Retrospect Express, the OEM version of the Backup and Recovery solution I use. Therefore, it also provides you with all the software you need to create a bootable backup on the FireWire drive. I've bought all of our FireWire drives from OWC.
Assuming you have a problem that requires wiping the drive to correct, one could still spend many hours reinstalling the OS, your third-party applications, and your data. Having a bootable backup makes that process far faster and less painful.
So, while what you're doing may be minimally adequate, I'd recommend looking into a FireWire-based bootable backup and recovery approach at some point when funds permit.
Good luck!
Dr. Smoke
Author: Troubleshooting Mac® OS X

Photoshop CS3 delete issues

I am having issues in photoshop. I can select a background of a photo but when I hit delete or cut nothing happens. I reset the preferences but still no luck. This has been going on for months and I need to get it fixed.
Had the same problem today inverting selection then hit delete. Nothing. Used CUT nothing. This makes life VERY difficult!

Hmmm... Difficult to test because i think most of use CS5, and delete brings up the Fill dialogue box.
Are these single layer 8 bit bitmap images (opened from a JPG or converted RAW file)? And you are hoping to leave the transparent background?

F110 - Payment proposal simulator

Dear all,
does anybody knows if SAP provide a standard report ables to perform a simulation of payment proposal?
That is, I need to extract the total amount of an hypothetic payment but without locking all open items as F110 does.
Thanks in advance!
Davide

Dear Andreas, my aim is just to avoid to run the proposal and lock all open item.
So, table REGUH and REGUP are unusable.
Thanks and best regards
Davide

F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.

Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please?

F110- payment proposal

Hi FI Gurus,
The vendor master have house bank key xxx1 ( SGD Bank a/c). while making payment to vendor through F110, I want to change house bank key with xxx2 (USD Bank a/c) in payment proposal with option re-allocate, but system won't allowed and giving errors msg. " Change not allowed - change payment amount". I unable to make payment to vendor with HB key xxx2
Is HB is picking from vendor master? or am I doing any mistatake? Please help to resolve my matter. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Prakash

Hi
House Bank is not an editable field once you create an invoice.
So it will throw error.
Regards
Srini

F110 - Payment proposal parameter

Hi all,
Pls tell me if I have created a payment proposal but not yet run, if I change the parameter, let say, "Posting date" or "Document entered up to date", will this changes get logged? Where can I check for the changes made by whom and when?
Thanks.

if you have created the proposal but run is not carried out then u can change the parameters ,if you had saved and created the proposal then first u will have to delete the old proposal then create it again.
thanks
deepa

F110 Payment Proposal - Payment Methods

Regardless of what payment method(s) you enter in the F110 parameters, the payment proposal still comes back with all open items - this can produce a long proposal list consisting mostly of exceptions (exceptions being open items not having the payment method you requested).
Is there any way of getting F110 to only select open items that have the payment method(s) you are interested in, and therefore considerably shorten the length of the proposal (and therefore the length of time it takes users to process it)?
Thanks.

Hi,
I'm seeking for a possibility to select only open items which are due for more then e.g. 10 days.
I've tried to use field Days in arrears [BSEG-PENDAYS] as a criteria for selection of items which where overdue for more then 10 days, but I couldn't fill the proper parameters.
Which parameters do I need and how do you fill the value fields ?
{I tried (1,100), believing this selects all items with days in arrears between 1 and 100 days, or deselects if you fill exclude values}
{I also tried field Days net [BSEG-ZBD3T] but don't know how to fill the values}
Thanx in advance

F110 Payment Proposal BTE

Hi ABAP Gurus,
Can you please suggest a Business Transaction Events (BTE) that I can use when performing Payment Proposal via F110? Basically, I will be updating the Payment Method (REGUP-ZLSCH) via this BTE.
Thank you very much and have a nice day.

hello Brando Braganza ,
y u want to updatte Payment method fields while doing the proposal only ?.....
y dont u update this fields while creating the finance document itself ?
regards
Prabhu

F110 paymnet proposal - Deletion Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for