Factoring, partial period factor

Hi all,
Can you please throw some light on (1) What is partial period factor(PPF), where to find details about PPF. (2) What is the diffrenece between SSOLL, SIDVI (3) For unpaid absences my wage type is displayed in the payroll form but the amount is not deducted,Specification in processing 10 is 1(/801)
Thanks,
Akki.

Hi,
Go through these links.It will give you some idea.
diff. between PPF and OUTPUT TYPES
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PYINT/PYINT_FACTORING.pdf
http://www.jt77.com/human2/resources-09522.html
Regards,
Manoj.

Similar Messages

Partial Period factoring

Dear Friends,
I have re-written the rule for Partial period factoring for LOP days and it is working fine.Now I need your help to do the same for mid-month joinees. Help needed in rewritting the second rule XPP1.
This is working fine for LOP Days,Deducting the number of days the employee is absent including holidays(including holidays is client's requirement)
UPP1 Determine partial period factors (subrule)-LOP Days when Indicator is 'U'
      /801 Partial period factor 1
        RTE=TKDIVI Set
        RTE-TKAU** Subtraction
        RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
        RTE/TKDIVI Division
        ADDWT *    OT   Output table
This needs the change
Employee Joined on November-17-2009. Sap is calculating by hours, requirement by Days.
XPP1 Determine partial period factors (subrule)- When Indicator is 'E'
      /801 Partial period factor 1
        RTE=TSSOLL Set
        RTE-TSAU** Subtraction
        RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
        RTE/TSDIVI Division
        ADDWT *    OT   Output table
I wanted the above rule to calculate for days instead of hours.

in standrad
hire an employee in mid month and check how the pay roll is being processed
801 Partial period factor 1
RTE=TKSOLL Set
RTE-TSAU** Subtraction
RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
RTE/TKDIVI Division
ADDWT * OT Output table
try this

Partial period factor

Hi
what is partial period factor and where it should be configured
Regards
Please try to search on your own

Hai..
If an employee did not work for the whole payroll period, then a partial remuneration is calculated during the payroll run. Factoring is used in the following cases:
To reduce payments made to an employee because he or she joins, leaves, or is absent from the company during a period
To calculate remuneration for an exact period because of substitutions, changes in basic pay, organizational reassignments, or changes in the personal work schedule
For further information pls check sap library under country specific payroll in the gross part,Factoring..
Ram Manohar

Partial Period Factor in INP1

Dear Experts,
I have copied INP1 to ZNP1& created new PPF as /807 in it. I have a wagetype 1102 - Attendance allowance that is to be paid to those having 0 days leave without pay in a month. I have set Processing Class 10 to WT 1102 as 7.
Now even if a person has 0 LWP, attendance allowance is not paid to him. If I set PC 10 to 3, then it is deducted in prorata basis which I dont want. May I know if this program is technically & logically correct for my requirement?
   /807 Partial period factor 7
     RTE=AAU** Set
     RTE?0      Comparison
         RTE=0      Set
         ADDWT *    OT   Output table
       =
         RTE=1      Set
         ADDWT *    OT   Output table
May I know commenly used commands / syntax in PCR & Schemas?
Regards
Bindumadhav
9869028264

Dear Shashi & Praveen,
Many thanx for your help. I am giving current scenario :
Setting    Amount without absence   Current Amount with absence              Expected Amount with absence
PC 10 = 3               1000          Proportionately deducted              Totally deducted
PC 10 = 7            Not Shown          Not Shown                              Totally deducted
Changes in ZVAL are as follows :
ZVAL Valuate payroll elements using partial period factors
        VWTCL 10   Processing class
            ERROR      Cancel processing
0
            ADDWT *    OT   Output table
7
            RTE=AAU** Set
            RTE?0      Comparison
                RTE=0      Set
                ADDWT *    OT   Output table
              =
                RTE=1      Set
                ADDWT *    OT   Output table
Changes in ZNP1 are as follows :
   /807 Partial period factor 7
     RTE=AAU** Set
     RTE?0      Comparison
         RTE=0      Set
         ADDWT *    OT   Output table
       =
         RTE=1      Set
         ADDWT *    OT   Output table
Please suggest if the coding logic is correct ?
Or Please call me on my mobile 9869028264
Regards
Bindumadhav
9869028264

Partial Period Factor - Processing Class 10

Hi Experts,
Please tell me the difference between the different specification of the processing class 10 like reduction with factor /801, /802....../809 .
regards
TS

hi ts,
these are the wagetypes which stores the standard formulas for reduction.. provided by sap, like as per calendar days,work days and hours. /801-/805 you have standard formulas..where as from /806 to /816 is for your customer specific formulas..

Processing class 10 and partial period factor specification /807

dear experts,
I want to know the difference in specification of /801 or /802 or 803 or /804 or /805 or /807 when we give or maintain processing class 10 for an y customised wage type in table v_t512w_d. there is no documetation for /806 or /807 wage types .can any one send me the documetation on this or explain

Just go to X013 PCR. There you can find the documentation.
Open the PCR in display mode and press F1 for documentation.
Reward the points.
Venu

Period factor : Depreciation posting

In the depreciation simulation, I find a 'period factor' with some value 0.5656. I dont get how this factor is derived by the ssytem. My asset value is 250000 and the declining depreciation rate is 10% with a 99 useful life.

It is possible that the asset was capitalized around the 5th month (around 206 days balance )of the year which brings in the computed period factor. Check your depreciation start date - It may not be for full year.
Thanks
Jagdish

Period factor VS SNP heuristic & deployment heuristic

Hi ,
I am using period factor to decide avalabilty date with in each bucket. i know first periority would be period factor in Tlane . accordingly i maintained period factor 0 .
SNP heuristics cretaes the receipts in the start of the buckets since period factor is ZERO.
But when i execute Deployment heuristic its NOT cretating in the start of the bucket. instead its creating middle of the each bucket
My questuion is.....
1) period factor setting is only for SNP Heuristic NOT for deployment heuristic???
2) if thats the case how to decide manually creation date in deployment?
3) Receipts available in middle of the bucket , But depoyment confirms the demand in the START of the bucket ? logically how its possible. it should not be???
Regards
Rajesh

Hi,
My understanding is that period factor of 0 is interpreted as 0.5 by heuristics.
So in your case Heuristics should create stock transfers in the middle of the bucket and deployment should just confirm it.
Please let me know the following.
You have maintained factor 0.5 in lane right?
Have you maintained any value in the product master?
What is your deployment method, pull or some type of Push?
What is your bucket type (days/weeks/months)?
Hi Claire,
I do not understand why a simple pull deployment has to schedule the stock transfers again?
It should just check the ATD qty and confirm the heuristic order, if possible right?
Could you please explain your point further with a scenario?.
Regards,
Ashok

Billing Factor and Conversion Factor..

Hi All,
While understanding meter reading estimation, I found two factors that are being used - Billing Factor and Conversion Factor. Please could anyone let me know where these billing factor and conversion factors are stored. I understand that the Register factor is maintained at the register level. I would like to know where the billing factor and the conversion factor get stored and how are they set per business rules of the industry.
Thanks in advance,
Yuvi.

Yuvi:
I am confused by your statements. Estimation works for all utility service scenarios, like electric, gas, water, etc. The differences are in the billing rules, the measurement details, and some conversion information. You also define the period details for estimation - do you use the previous period or the same period previous year. The unbilled scenario you describe is executed the same for any service type. The readings are checked, the estimation rules are evaluated and then an estimated reading is determined. The conversion factor and billing factor could be independent of the estimation logic which determines the reading. But that reading, based upon the device details, could be multiplied to determine a billing quantity. It might also be converted from the unit of measure for the reading to the unit of measure for billing eg. ccf > mcf.
You should be able to find documentation on unbilled calculations, as well as estimation.
regards,
bill.

Partial Period Parameter Error

Dear all,
I had created new daily work schedule, period work schedule, define valuation classes, set work schedule rules and generate work schedule.
After creation of this new work schedule rule, I assign it to an employee infotype 0007 Planned working time.
However, when I simulate payroll for this employee, error occurs.
I check in the log, when operation PARTT Partial month parameter, message was shown "Customizing error in work schedule rule 2 MY 14 SECG1SU". System could determine the Partial period parameter for WPBP period 02. There was no Individual divisors for partial period in WPBP period 02 being computed.
Please help...

Customizing error in work schedule rule 2 MY 14 SECG1SU".
here 2 is ur EG
MY is ur Holiday Calendar
14 is ur PSA
SECG1SU is ur DWSR
Check the dates of the above customisations and also check the Groupings properly Check the tables
V_001P_ALL V_503_ALL thru SM3o for that PERNR
did u generated the WSR thru PT01
Edited by: Sikindar on Jan 24, 2009 2:43 PM

Partial & Periodic Invoicing plan

What is Partial & Periodic invoicing plan ? How it can use for some perticular monthly service?
what are the settings to do it in SAP.

You use the periodic invoicing plan if the total value of the PO item is to be invoiced in each period. When you create a PO with a periodic invoice plan only the value of one month is displayed on the header status and used for the release strategy. If you want the entire 12 months included you should use the partial invoice plan and specify the invoice amount for each month
Search the forum.
Regards
Ayyallas

Suggesting a Rating-factor or Indifference-factor for the Forum Posters

Hi,
This is actually not a question, but a suggestion on presenting forum users' behavior indicators.
I like the new point system that OTN introduced that allows the questioner to rate the answers based on how it solved his/her problem.
However, in some forums, the forum users show exceeded indifference and apathy for rating answers. Often they do not rate a correct answer using the rating method; and sometimes even after acknowledging informally that the question has been answered. I often come across posters who post a question and on seeing the reply they do not answer or even acknowledge any help they receive even informally until they get stuck in the next steps. If it just goes for once in a while, then it's ok. However, some forums show a greater prevalence of such trends and some users show a habitual indifference. I don't know if you have noticed it too.
So, I was wondering what if a rating-factor for the questioners (or indifference-factor, or courtesy-factor) is introduced that can reflect the %age of answers a questioner rates as correct, or helpful. Similarly, their tendency to mark a question as answered when it is answered may also reflect in a similar factor.
what do you think?
AMN

I understand what you're saying, but to me, this is like saying that we want to rate the questioners so if they don't award points we can avoid answering them.
The only questioners I tend to avoid answering are the ones who are blatently rude or obnoxious. Just because they haven't awarded points for getting answers to their questions is not really an overriding factor, in my book anyway. I come here to learn stuff myself and to assist where I can, regardless of whether people give me points for it or not. I've never once had to ask for any of the points I've been awarded, I've just been given them, yet if I had received points for all the useful answers I'd given I'd probably have twice the amount... and so would a lot of other members here. If I'd received no points, I would still answer questions cos, to me, it's not about feeding my ego by saying "look at me I've got loads of points", it's about me assisting and learning from other people's issues and the other expert answers given.
On a more practical/technical level I think you'll find that the forum is limited by what the Jive software is capable of, so whilst it came with a question answered/points system as part of the package, I think awarding points against members for other reasons is probably not part of it's capabilities.
;)

Difference between Receiver Tracing factors and weighting factor

Hi
I   have read sap help, but   the difference between receiver tracing factor and receiver weighting factor is still not clear.
Can u provide an example to understand it.
Thanks
kamala

Hi Kamala
As far as I know, the weigh fac is meant to determine the decimal places...and Sender values tab is meant for determining the % to be allocated...
In the tab "Weigh factor", you would see a field FACTOR PER, which has the following entries
0000001 No decimal places
0000010 One decimal place
0000100 Two decimal places
0001000 Three decimal places
0010000 Four decimal places
0100000 Five decimal places
1000000 Six decimal places
By default it is 0000100 which means 2 decimals..F1 help on this field shows that
You enter 123456 as the weighting factor. Depending on the factor, this number is interpreted as:
Factor      Decimal places   Weighting factor
1                 0              123456
10                 1              12345.6
100               2              1234.56
Hope this helps
Regards
Ajay M

Rules of factoring

Hi All
what are the difference between XPPF, XPP1, XPP0, X VAL ?
please can anybody explain
charan

Hi,
what are the difference between XPPF - To determine partial periods like termination, basic pay change, unpaid absences.
XPP0, This is sub rule for XPPF
XPP1: Partial period factor on which basis we are going to calculate like on calendar days and working days, working hours
X VAL - Valuate payroll elements using partial period factors,
Valuate payroll elements are basic pay, hra, Conveyance, DA etc.
Regards
Devi

Wrong display of No. of days worked in Payslip for mid-month joining

Dear Experts,
We use PE51, form editor for payslip for indian payrol. Our issue is when an employee joins mid of the month or say 4th of any month, still in payslip it shows no. of working days as 30/31 days instead of actual days worked. But pay results are correctly being calculated on factoring basis.
Please let me know how to resolve it, we use PCR ZNP1 for factoring which is written as follows
ZNP1 Partial factors for India - /801(CD), /802(WD), /803(WH),/804(Nom)
      /801 Partial period factor 1
        RTE=TKSOLL Set
        RTE-TKAU** Subtraction
        RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
        RTE/TKDIVI Division
        ADDWT *    OT   Output table
      /802 Partial period factor 2
        RTE=TASOLL Set
        RTE-TAAU** Subtraction
        RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
        RTE/TADIVI Division
        ADDWT *    OT   Output table
      /803 Partial period factor 3
        RTE=TSSOLL Set
        RTE-TSAU** Subtraction
        RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
        RTE/TSDIVI Division
        ADDWT *    OT   Output table
      /804 Partial period factor 4
      /805 Partial period factor 5
      /806 Partial period factor 6
      /807 Partial period factor 7
Please guide, if i need to modify it for getting correct working days display in payslip
Regards
Tan

in that case the Requirement is to display no of working days of employee in a month
Here working days means
Total Calendar Days - Unpaid days - Paid days = working days ( please check the said one again since i have inculded the paid days and unpaid days if u want u can remove paid days)
so in order to fetch this
we need Calendar days that is TKSOLL
Unpaid days   check the technical wage types /845 Paid days /846 ( you can have custom wage types too)
Copy a wage type from standrad overtime wage type that will be 1555
The PCR is as follows
NUM=TKSOLL (calendar Days)
NUM-E /846      Paid days
NUM-E /845
ADDWT 15555
Use ACTIO function and insert it any where in Sub Schema XT00

Factoring, partial period factor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for