FB60 vs. MIRO in reference to MRBR

In accounts payable, is it necessary to use MRBR if using FB60 to post vendor invoices? It is my understanding that only invoices posted with MIRO will show up in MRBR to be released. Therefore, if we have a payment block on a FB60, can we just skip ahead to selecting the invoices needed to be paid in F110?
What would be the proper business procedure when using FB60 to get to F110?
Also, would it be possible to just use MIRO all together instead of FB60?

Hi
Yes
If you enter the invoice by FB60, you'll create an accouting document without a link to the logistic, so if it's locked, it means it's an accounting block and you have to delete it by FI transaction (like FB02)
Max

Similar Messages

CO-PA FB60 vs MIRO

Hi guys, we are posting third party invoices through FB60 and MIRO. We need to make sure cost should flow to CO-PA. Can some one explain advantages and disadvantages using FB60 or MIRO. Is there white paper or documentation I can go and study so that we can submit our recommendations to customer. Please help.

HI
Double invoice check for a vendor is possible for:
1. Company Code
2. Invoice Date
3. Referece document
If in config all of these are selected, and if you enter 2 invoices with all same values for above parameters, then system will throw an error.
Amount is not checked for this and can you verify may be Reference given differently
Thanks
Vishnu

Reporting country on FB60 and MIRO for EU countries

Hi,
I am trying to post an Incoming Invoice using FB60 or MIRO.
Since the company code is defined as a EU country(Netherlands), the Reporting country and VAT registration number fields apear on the 'DETAILS' Tab on both MIRO and FB60.
Once reporting country is entered, the VAT number gets selected from the Vendor Master.
I have the following questions for which I need help:
1. Is there a way to configure MIRO and FB60 so that the 'reporting country' is automatically selected and defaulted once I enter the Vendor Number? (similar to how the Payment terms gets defaulted from Vendor master).
Currently, I have to enter the reporting country each time I enter an Invoice.
2.If the Invoice is saved without entering the 'Reporting country', if I try to change the Invoice document, this field is not available for edit and so I cannot fill the Rptg country later. (The field appears in Document Header).
Is there a way to handle this in FB60 and MIRO configuration so that the field 'reporting country' is available for change when we change document using Fb02? is there a seperate setting for this?
Thanks,
Uma Toraskar

Hi Uma,
did you find some solutions for your questions?
Greetings, Vanessa

Posting MIRO with reference to MIGO document number

Hi,
Is there any way of posting a vendor invoice in MIRO, taking MIGO document number as the reference instead of PO or Delivery Note reference?
Muru

Hi,
In MIGO you mention the delivery note in the header part.
There is a drop down in MIRO transaction where we enter PO number, please check and you will find the "Delivery Note" option in the drop down list.
you can do the MIRO with reference to this Delivery Note number from this option.
(Just make sure, that you have selected the "GR based IR" indicator in the PO line item.)
Doiong MIRO with reference to material document number of MIGO is not possible in standatd SAP.
Regards,
Gaurav

FB60 / MIGO / MIRO

What is the main purpose of each of these transactions as it relates to AP? What are the primary differences between these transactions?

hi Hari
Good question
first os all understand the process of Account payable
there are two scenario
Local purchase
Import purchase
when u purchase a material from vendor, there are flow how to receive material and post the invocie
in local case- u create Purchase requisation - PO -
then u receive a material u capture Excise
J1IEX - Capture excise
then u post good receipt Through MIGO Transaction
MIGO Means - Good receipt whichever u receipt
here fi entry genrated
Stock a./c dr
GR/IR A/c
then u post the excise through J1IEX
then u post vendor invocie through MIRO T.Code
here fi entry
Vendor Cr
GR/IR Dr
Excise Dr
cess on excise Dr
Secess Dr
u use FB60 and MIRO for Vendor invoice
then u make a payment through
F-53 - Mannual
F110 -- Automatic
If any query revert back
Regards
Roobal

MIRO with reference to delivery note in import case.

Hi,
While doing the invoice verification in case of import scenario for main vendor we are facing the problem.
We have created the PO with a 3 line items , but the material code entered is same in all three line items. We have done the GRN with reference to the PO for each line item seperately with different delivery notes in each case.
Now while doing the MIRO when i gave the reference of delivery note number system is showing all 3 quantities in MIRO screen instead of single line item with qty 1.
Why it is so.Please guide.

Select GR by vendor with posting date in miro.
Check this SAP note 393431 - MIRO - Vendor
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Jul 6, 2010 9:45 AM

MIRO with reference to MIGO number

Hi All,
I want to have MIRO with respect to MIGO Number.
e.g
PO QTY 1000
GRN 1 -
10 Qty
GRN 2------5 Qty
Required scenario:
If we run MIRO then Qty would be 15 Qty
We have a requirement that MIRO is done GRN wise.
like for MIGO # 1 -
MIRO reflects 10 Qty
for MIGO #2----
MIRO reflects 5 qTY

Hi ,
In standard SAP it is not possible to select MIGO no to do MIRO .
Only you can use the Delivary note no. as reference for doing MIRO .
Else , purchase order is always taken as reference and non required line item is deselcted at the time of MIRO .
So please check how best you can use the filed delivary note in MIGO for doing MIRO .
Regards,
Dewang T.

FB60 vs MIRO

Hi All
I am using "Instruction Keys" for entering some data for the bank. When posting via FB60 there is no problem - these fields are nicely on "Payment" tab. When using MIRO I can't see them!!!! I do not understand it - the field status is the same, the posting key is the same.... I do not know any other parameters resonsible for those instruction keys field(s).
Anyone will help please!!!!
Regards
R.

Hello Robert
As per my information unfortunately, MIRO does not support these fields DTWS1-DTWS4.
This functionality is not implemented for MM invoice verification and therefore the screens of the MM invoice verification do not contain these fields.
Regards
Javier Reviriego

T-code:FB60 and MIRO business place validation Section Code mandatory

Hi,
My requirement is to make mandatory in MIRO and FB60 field: BUPLA-business place and field:SECCO-Section Code.
I have done validation through GGB0 . i am facing problem
prerequisite: syst-tcode = 'FB60'
check bseg-bupla   <>   ' ' and bseg-secco <> ' '
message 'Enter business place and business section.
This is working fine when bseg-bupla and bseg-secco is not entered .
but when user enter value in both fields bseg-bupla and bseg-secco .
in table bseg-bupla and bseg-secco both become blank.
Is ther any other method to achieve this
regads,
K.Shobha.

Hi
Have you tried it with customizing tools? I understand that you can achieve it. I think that you want to populate these fields if you have a field status group for this account (check it in FS00). You can create a field status group for this account and do mandatory this fields. If you have doubts, search the help of a FI consultant.
If you see the help for this field:
Field status group
    Determines the screen layout for document entry.
    Fields can have the following statuses:
    o   Optional entry - you can enter data in the field
    o   Mandatory entry - you must enter data in the field
    o   Suppressed - the field does not appear on the screen
You can mantain it with tcode OBC4.
I hope this helps you.
Regards
Eduardo

Delivery date in MIRO - PO reference

I would like to see the delivery date (posting date in the GR document) in the MIRO transaction under PO reference. There is a delivery date that appears in the All information layout, but that refers to the expected delivery date. Please advise.

Hi,
Go to SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Environment Data > Define Attributes of System Messages > System Messages - Here make message no. ME039 i.e. Delivery date is in the past as ERROR.
But this will check the System Date not PO Date.

Automatic invoice reduction - MIRO XBLNR1 - Reference field

Hello all,
I've set up the automatic invoice reduction in MIRO due to errors in vendor invoice (with subsequent credit received in paper).
In this process there are two FI documents (A1 for invoice and background A2 for reduction) regarding the original MM document.
The user uses "refence" field in invoice header to relate to the vendors physical document but the field only goes into A1 (BKPF) document and not A2, event with this A2 being background document and in it's master this reference field being mandatory...
How can I put the reference field in A2 as well?
Regards.

Hello,
Procedure for posting the Invoice Reduction :
(1) Enter the T.Code MIRO - Select the Transaction as Invoice only.
(2) Give the reference number ( Example PO Number) for which you want to create an Invoice.
(3) In the Display Variant, Select Invocie Reduction.
(4) Maintain the required details and post the Invocie.
Example: Invoice Reduction due to Quantity Variance:
PO: 100 nos @ 10 EUR/No
GR: 40 nos
Invoice: 40 nos @ 12 EUR/No = 480 EUR
When you enter Invoice,
Order Qty Order Amount Invoiced Qty Invocied Amt
40 400
Select Reduce Invocie in the Display Variant.
Enter the Quantity and Amount stated in the Invocie in the fields Invoice quantity acc. vendor and Invoice amount acc. vendor.
Order Qty Order Amount Invoiced Qty Invocied Amt
40 400 40 480
When you post the Invocie, Purchase order history will be updated as follows:
Quantity Value
Total Delivered 40 400
Total Invoiced 40 400
Accounting Documents:
GR:
Stock Account = 400
GR/IR Clearing Account = 400(-)
Invoice:
Vendor Account = 480(-)
GR/IR Clearing Account = 400(-)
Invoice Reduction Clearing Account = 80(+)
Automatic Credit Memo:
Vendor Account = 80(+)
Invoice Reduction Clearing Account = 80(-)
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

Miro with reference to PO

hi,
i have 2 scenario for credit memo and subsequent credit which is referenced to PO.
the item purchased is based on moving average price.
1) when vendor invoice comes in, quantity difference, say missing 5 box (original 20 box). i will create the invoice by changing the quantity in miro to 15 box. then later when vendor sends in the credit note, i will create the credit memo. in credit memo, i need to call out the PO and change the quantity to 5 box. correct?
2) let say the invoice comes in and found out the price is printed wrong by mistake of higher price which is not due to quantity. i will create the invoice by changing the price in miro. then later on when vendor sends in credit note, i need to create subsequent credit. may i know i still need to call out PO when do subsequent credit?
3) as this is based on moving average and not standard price, the variance will go to stock account. the double entry for point 1 and 2 will be both also debit vendor credit stock?
thanks

Hi,
1) If you are to post a credit memo on receipt from the Vendor, then at the time of original invoice, there should n't be any changes made either in qty. or value, it should be done in line with the GR qty and value.
2) Invoice to be raised for the original qty and value, subsequent credit to be raised on receipt of the credit note from the supplier,
Both the Credit Memo and Subsequent credit to be referred from the PO both entries will be debit vendor credit stock
Regards
Merwyn

MIRO PO Reference Delivery Note

Dear Gurus,
we have a problem with PO Reference using Delivery Note
when there are multiple PO with the same Delivery note on 1 vendor, for some reason SAP taking the old PO(finished PO) as reference
the problem is the old PO having old Payment term which is different than current payment term.
example for vendor Cipta Pratama SM Box the PO number 45031395 is an old PO(year 2009 PO which already finished) with old Payment Term(30 days) which is different than current Payment Term(45 days)
is there any setting that I can change to fix this strange behaviour?
Regards,
Fredy

Dear Dev Patra,
yes you are correct, I believe I already read that on some SAP note when I search for a solution on my problem(which is a fail attemp, I can't found SAP note that related to my problem).
but that is the case when I enter reference using PO number.
in my case I enter Delivery Number as reference
then SAP give me Vendor Selection since there are multiple Vendor that have the same Delivery Note
and SAP give reference on PO 0045031395 which is already a finished PO.
can't SAP skip Finished PO from reference, and take the Newest PO(with the same delivery note) instead?
regards,
Fredy

Document clearing required in vendor invoice in FB60 and MIRO

Hello Experts,
I am posting one vendor invoice. I want to distribute one vendor invoice between two profit centers. Now SAP is posting following entries:
Expense A/c... Dr (Cost Center: 100001 / Profit Center: 1000) - Rs.5000
Tax Receivable A/c... Dr (Profit Center: 1100) - Rs.400 (Default profit center for this GL is pulled from FAGL3KEH)
    To Vendor A/c (Profit Center 1000) - Rs.5000
    To Vendor A/c (Profit Center 1100) - Rs.400
In above entry, vendor line item is getting divided into two profit center. But my requirement is that, system should not vendor line item in two. It should post using document balance clearing A/c. Desired entry is:
Expense A/c... Dr (Cost Center: 100001 / Profit Center: 1000) - Rs.5000
Tax Receivable A/c... Dr (Profit Center: 1100) - Rs.400 (Default profit center for this GL is pulled from FAGL3KEH)
Document Splitting clearing A/c... Dr (Profit Center 1000) - Rs.400
    To Vendor A/c (Profit Center 1000) - Rs.5400
    To Document Splitting clearing A/c (Profit Center 1100) - Rs.400
Please help me in achieving the above set of entries. Following and attached are the settings done for document splitting:
1. Vendor GL account is marked as 03000 (Vendor) without overridden tick.
2. Tax GL account is marked as 05100 (Tax on Sales / Purchase) without overridden tick.
3. Expense GL account is marked as 20000 (Expense) without over ridden tick.
Please look into it and provide with your inputs

Hi Deepak,
check document splitting for gl a/c give vendor recon a/c gl and give item category as vendor.
also check doucment type which you are using it should be vendor only.
when ever you use document splitting don't use standard one copy it do the modifications.
Regards,
Raman

Reference filed length in MIRO and FB60 should be increased.

Hi ,
I have a problem with the reference filed in the transaction MIRO and FB60, needs to increase the field length from 16 to 19.
Is it possible ? if so how we can we do that?
We have got one idea to use existing Header text field for the reference field, then how to map the Header text field to reference field in the General Ledger?
can you pls look into this and do the the needfull.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Phani.

Hi,
I think you can change field length for reference field. Goto domain XBLNR1 and change the length of the field.
Or
There is another common field (assignment field) in both the transactions FB60 and MIRO.
This is field also additional information field for item. this field length is 18. You can use this field instead of changing length of reference field.
You can see this field in FBL1N also.
Regards,
Chandra

FB60 vs. MIRO in reference to MRBR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for