FD10N and Sp GL Transactions

Hi
Does FD10N triggers special GL transactions also?
Thanks
Sanjay

Hi,
Try using FD11 you have the icon for selection in initial screen.
Regards
K.R

Similar Messages

  • Define event types in Customizing and restart the transaction.

    how to define event to restart the transaction in BADI
    I have given error message in badi. it is giving
    No SAP Event Management communication for events; no event types def
        Message no. /SAPTRX/ASC084
    Diagnosis
        You have not defined event types for the business process types.
        therefore not possible to communicate event data to SAP Event
        Management.
    System response
        The communication of event data is aborted.
    Procedure
        Define event types in Customizing and restart the transaction.

    Hi Kevin,
    What DataSource does your testalias refer to?
    - If it is a custom DataSource, you must have created this custom DataSource also.
    - If it is the default DataSource, you shouldn't have this problem in general...
    In either case, you can try deploying your DataSource and/or DataSource alias together with your application:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce10/helpdata/en/45/07d2eeea3e0485e10000000a155369/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce10/helpdata/en/45/c82cd460a42e96e10000000a155369/frameset.htm
    I hope that helps!
    Regards,
    Yordan

  • How to start and finish a transaction using EJB 3.0 in JDeveloper

    Hello everybody!
    Does anybody can explain how to start and finish a transaction using EJB 3.0. I need to start a transaction insert some information in some tables and if everything was fine commit the information.
    I put the annotation @TransactionManagement(TransactionManagementType.BEAN) in my session bean and @Resource SessionContext ejbContext; but I don't what anything else I have to do.
    Any help will be appreciate.

    I tryied to use in the client the statement EntityTransaction transaction = myBean.getTransact(); but I receive the EJBException: Cannot use resource level transactions with a container managed EntityManager
    I just need to start a transaction something like this: transaction.begin(); and finish the transaction, something like this: transaction.commit();
    Does anybody can help?

  • Error while loading and adding IC Transaction

    I received the following error while loading IC Transaction through Load Tasks utility and adding IC Transaction through Process IC Transaction option
    Transactions Load - log:
    *'Cell does not support inter-company transaction details*
    Rajhi Holding; Falcon; 4110100;[NONE];[NONE];[NONE];[NONE];CF1234; 1; 01/01/2006; SAR; 2000; 2000; 1; FC1234; Grant;OWE
    Kindly tell me what it is and how I can resolve this issue.

    Hello
    The probleme is that you have to include in your rule the transactions rule, to allow the acount where you whant to load icp transaction.
    If you are working with YTD that you should use a diferent acount to load the icp transaction and then make the ajustment.
    Becuse the program would not allow to load data and if you have already data it will give you an error, if you load your rule with the integrity box check
    Sub Transactions()
         Hs.SupportsTran "A#Modulo_ICP_Ventas"
         Hs.SupportsTran "A#Modulo_ICP_Costos"
         Hs.SupportsTran "A#Modulo_ICP_Deudores"
         Hs.SupportsTran "A#Modulo_ICP_Acreedores"
    End Sub
    hope it helps

  • Two phase commit and bean managed transactions

    To all the Transaction GURUS!
              Hi guys (-and gals).
              I've been doing J2EE for quite a while, but today was my first at
              XA-Transactions and Bean Managed Transactions.
              Why am I doing this?
              ====================
              Well I have to be able to controll the transactionalbehaviour of my
              bean
              during runtime, since some bean calls would cause a transactional
              overflow due to the stress they would cause to the system, whereas
              smaller bean calls need to run in one transaction.
              -> Therefore I need Bean Managed Transactions
              Since the bean does a call on two Database Connections it has to use a
              XA-Transaction.
              -> Therefore I need XA-Transactions.
              Abstract
              ========
              - I just can't get a User TransAction into the right Status it stays
              in 'STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION' all the time
              - Therefore the SQL Commands can be comitted 'java.sql.SQLException:
              Does not support SQL execution with no global transaction'
              - Therefore I can't do a rollback 'java.lang.IllegalStateException:
              Transaction does not exist'
              - Therefore I wrote this mail.
              I don't want to be a smart-"ass" writing such a detailed and indepth
              mail. I just would like to show that I tried, and would like to have
              some replies from you guys.
              Below are my configurations, code and logfiles.
              Thanx for taking your time and hope that the other people may learn
              something as well.
              cu
              Stefan
              Scenario
              ========
              used Software
              Bea Weblogic (WL) 6.0 SPx (not real sure which SP i have)
              Oracle 8.1.6 using the API-Version 8
              I configured the system as follows:
              (ofcourse I 'xxx'ed out all of the confidential data, sorry guys;-))
              excerpt from:
              config.xml
              <JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
              DriverName="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver" InitialCapacity="2"
              LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="5" Name="oraclePool"
              Properties="user=xxx;password=xxx;dll=ocijdbc8;protocol=thin"
              RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
              TestTableName="languages" URL="jdbc:oracle:thin:@xxx:1521:xxx "/>
              <!-- Since this is our Main Datasource I would not like to use a XA
              Transaction due to performance Issues
              and the TxDataSource:
              -->
              <JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="true"
              JNDIName="finstral.datasource.fbs" Name="finstral Content Datasource"
              PoolName="oraclePool" Targets="fbsserver"/>
              <!-- no comment required -I hope.
              Next comes the "special" Pool
              -->
              <JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
              DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XADataSource" InitialCapacity="1"
              LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="2" Name="oracleSecurityPool"
              Properties="user=xxx;password=xxx;server=xxx.xxx.xxx"
              RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
              TestTableName="Users" SupportsLocalTransaction="true"/>
              <!-- Well since there can only be one none XARessourceManager involved
              in a 2PC
              (keyword: Two Phase Commit) I will have to use a XACapable Driver for
              the other
              Datasource. Due to all the bugs in the oracle.xxx driver. I'll be
              using the jdriver for oci.
              I activated 'SupportsLocalTransaction' hoping it would solve my
              problem - without effect. I just left in there now, since it made
              sense me. Not?
              Again the TxDataSource:
              -->
              <JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="true"
              JNDIName="finstral.datasource.fbssecurity" Name="finstral Security
              Datasource" PoolName="oracleSecurityPool" Targets="fbsserver"/>
              <!-- The System starts right up and can locate the test tables and
              everything. So I think all of this stuff is working here -->
              ejb-jar.xml
              <ejb-jar>
                   <enterprise-beans>
                        <session>
                             <ejb-name>TPCTestBean</ejb-name>
              <home>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCHome</home>
              <remote>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPC</remote>
              <ejb-class>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean</ejb-class>
                             <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
                             <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
                        </session>
                   </enterprise-beans>
                   <assembly-descriptor/>
              </ejb-jar>
              <!-- Originally I had the assembly-descriptor full of transaction
              requirements. I thought since
              the bean is handling all of the transaction stuff itself, it might get
              confused by the 'container-transaction'
              properties, and deleted them. Do I need them anyway?-->
              weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
              <weblogic-ejb-jar>
                   <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
                        <ejb-name>TPCTestBean</ejb-name>
                        <stateless-session-descriptor/>
                        <jndi-name>finstral/ejb/test_tpc</jndi-name>
                   </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
              </weblogic-ejb-jar>
              <!-- Nothing I have to explain here -->
              BeanCode (from the implementingBeanClass:
              'de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean')
              public void setupTables() throws RemoteException
              UserTransaction tx = getTransaction();
              //getTransaction calls: 'tx = sCtx.getUserTransaction()' and does
              some errorhandling
              log.info("Die Transaktion vor den Connections: "+tx.toString());
              //Sorry bout the German. You should get the Message though.
              log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor den Connections:
              "+transactionStatus(tx));
              Connection conSecurity = getConnection(DATASOURCE_SECURITY, tx);
              //gets a Connection via a DataSourceName from the JNDI tree
              Connection conContent = getConnection(DATASOURCE_CONTENT, tx);
              log.info("Die frische Connection conSecurity: "+conSecurity);
              log.info("Die frische Connection conContent: "+conContent);
              tearDownTable(conSecurity);
              //Does nothing special
              tearDownTable(conContent);
              log.info("Die Transaktion nach dem Teardown: "+tx.toString());
              log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Teardown:
              "+transactionStatus(tx));
              Statement stmt = null;
              try
              stmt = conSecurity.createStatement();
              //Well its getting interesting now.....
              log.info("Die Transaktion vor dem createtable: "+tx.toString());
              log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem createtable:
              "+transactionStatus(tx));
              log.info("Die Connection conSecurity vor dem createtable:
              "+conSecurity);
              log.info("Die Connection conContent vor dem createtable:
              "+conContent);
              stmt.executeUpdate(CREATE_TABLE);
              //above is the row 91 -> throws: 'java.sql.SQLException: Does
              not support SQL execution with no global transaction'
              stmt.close();
              stmt = conContent.createStatement();
              stmt.executeUpdate(CREATE_TABLE);
              stmt.close();
              commitTransaction(tx);
              catch (SQLException sqle)
              log.error("Konnte kein table init machen", sqle);
              rollbackTransaction(tx);
              //The Code for this method is below
              throw new EJBException(sqle);
              finally
              closeConnection(conSecurity);
              closeConnection(conContent);
              protected void rollbackTransaction(UserTransaction tx)
              log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem Rollback:
              "+transactionStatus(tx));
              log.info("Die Transaktion vor dem Rollback: "+tx.toString());
              try
              tx.rollback();
              //above is row 200 -> throws: 'java.lang.IllegalStateException:
              Transaction does not exist'
              log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Rollback:
              "+transactionStatus(tx));
              log.info("Die Transaktion nach dem Rollback: "+tx.toString());
              catch (Exception e)
              log.error("Konnte die Transaktion nicht backrollen.", e);
              throw new EJBException(e);
              Log Excerpt
              ===========
              INFO setupTables() (66) - Die Transaktion vor den Connections:
              [email protected]
              INFO setupTables() (67) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor den Connections:
              STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
              INFO setupTables() (72) - Die frische Connection conSecurity:
              weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@7c6daa
              INFO setupTables() (73) - Die frische Connection conContent:
              weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@3b425
              INFO setupTables() (78) - Die Transaktion nach dem Teardown:
              [email protected]
              INFO setupTables() (79) - Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Teardown:
              STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
              INFO setupTables() (86) - Die Transaktion vor dem createtable:
              [email protected]
              INFO setupTables() (87) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem createtable:
              STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
              INFO setupTables() (88) - Die Connection conSecurity vor dem
              createtable: weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@7c6daa
              INFO setupTables() (89) - Die Connection conContent vor dem
              createtable: weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@3b425
              ERROR setupTables() (101) - Konnte kein table init machen
              java.sql.SQLException: Does not support SQL execution with no global
              transaction
                   at
              weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XAConnection.beforeExecute(XAConnection.java:137)
                   at
              weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:112)
                   at weblogic.jdbc.jta.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:185)
                   at
              weblogic.jdbc.rmi.internal.StatementImpl.executeUpdate(StatementImpl.jav
              a:42)
                   at
              weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialStatement.executeUpdate(SerialStatement.java:54)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.setupTables(TPCBean.jav
              a:91)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanImpl.setupTables(TPCBean
              Impl.java:130)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanEOImpl.setupTables(TPCBe
              anEOImpl.java:64)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.TwoPhaseCommitUnitTest.setUp(TwoPhaseCo
              mmitUnitTest.java:51)
                   at
              org.apache.commons.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runBareServerTest(AbstractTes
              tCase.java:297)
                   at
              org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.callTestMethod(Servle
              tTestCaller.java:148)
                   at
              org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.doTest(ServletTestCal
              ler.java:199)
                   at
              org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestRedirector.doPost(ServletTes
              tRedirector.java:149)
                   at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
                   at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
                   at
              weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.
              java:213)
                   at
              weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServl
              etContext.java:1265)
                   at
              weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.
              java:1631)
                   at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
                   at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
              INFO rollbackTransaction() (196) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem
              Rollback: STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
              INFO rollbackTransaction() (197) - Die Transaktion vor dem Rollback:
              [email protected]
              ERROR rollbackTransaction() (206) - Konnte die Transaktion nicht
              backrollen.
              java.lang.IllegalStateException: Transaction does not exist
                   at
              weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.rollback(Transactio
              nManagerImpl.java:228)
                   at
              weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.rollback(Transactio
              nManagerImpl.java:222)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.rollbackTransaction(TPC
              Bean.java:200)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.setupTables(TPCBean.jav
              a:102)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanImpl.setupTables(TPCBean
              Impl.java:130)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanEOImpl.setupTables(TPCBe
              anEOImpl.java:64)
                   at
              de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.TwoPhaseCommitUnitTest.setUp(TwoPhaseCo
              mmitUnitTest.java:51)
                   at
              org.apache.commons.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runBareServerTest(AbstractTes
              tCase.java:297)
                   at
              org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.callTestMethod(Servle
              tTestCaller.java:148)
                   at
              org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.doTest(ServletTestCal
              ler.java:199)
                   at
              org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestRedirector.doPost(ServletTes
              tRedirector.java:149)
                   at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
                   at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
                   at
              weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.
              java:213)
                   at
              weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServl
              etContext.java:1265)
                   at
              weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.
              java:1631)
                   at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
                   at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
              CONCLUSION
              ==========
              I'm going nuts.
              I just don't get it.
              The transaction is the same. I don't change the Connection. I start
              the Transaction at the beginning before I do anything!
              Please guys help me out.
              Thx alot.
              Stefan "it's three o'clock in the morning, my girlfriend left me, and
              my only friend is that stupid linux pinguine" Siprell
              Software-Development
              <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
              <sitewaerts> GmbH
              Hebelstraße 15
              D-76131 Karlsruhe
              Tel: +49 (721) 920 918 22
              Fax: +49 (721) 920 918 29
              http://www.sitewaerts.de
              >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
              

    Hi Priscilla
              (did you ever see the movie ? :-))
              Well I moved away from the idea of using bean managed transaction. I'll
              be using Container Managed Transactions. To modify the
              transactionalbehaviour I'll write proxymethods which have certain
              different containermanaged transaction properties, but which all call
              the same private methods.
              But it works! Here is my experience:
              - I was doing a DDL statement: I was trying to create new Tables, which
              is a definite "no-go"
              - pay careful attention to:
              http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs60/jta/trxejb.html#1051405
                        and
              http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs60/jta/trxejb.html#1051741
              and use these Settings for the Pool, don't ask me why, but it took me
              hours to find it out by myself:
                   <JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
              DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XADataSource" InitialCapacity="1"
              LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="2" Name="oracleSecurityPool"
              Properties="user=xxx; password=xxx; server=xxx.xxx.xxx"
              RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
              TestTableName="Users" SupportsLocalTransaction="true"/>
              where as the server (shown as: xxx.xxx.xxx) is the TNS Name of the
              Oracle Driver.
              It works great.
              Another thing you guys might want to do is write a simple StatelessSB
              which does JDBC calls and two different database Connections.
              Then write a UnitTest which calls this bean a couple hundred times (with
              the same transaction). Have one test do clean writes, and another which
              causes some SQL-Exception (too long Data Columns, or likewise).
              Always count the entries and see if everything worked out. We're using
              this SetupConstruction to test new combinations of AS(sorry Priscilla) /
              Database / Db-Drivers to have a "standard test".
              I know my two cents were uncalled for, but it might save you some
              time.....
              thanx for your help
              Stefan
              -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
              Von: Priscilla Fung [mailto:[email protected]]
              Bereitgestellt: Donnerstag, 2. August 2001 21:42
              Bereitgestellt in: transaction
              Unterhaltung: Two phase commit and bean managed transactions
              Betreff: Re: Two phase commit and bean managed transactions
              Hi Stefan,
              Looks like you have not actually begun a transaction by calling
              UserTransaction.begin(),
              so your setupTables method is really executing with no transaction
              context.
              Priscilla
              Stefan Siprell <[email protected]> wrote:
              >To all the Transaction GURUS!
              >
              >Hi guys (-and gals).
              >I've been doing J2EE for quite a while, but today was my first at
              >XA-Transactions and Bean Managed Transactions.
              >
              >Why am I doing this?
              >====================
              >Well I have to be able to controll the transactionalbehaviour of my
              >bean
              >during runtime, since some bean calls would cause a transactional
              >overflow due to the stress they would cause to the system, whereas
              >smaller bean calls need to run in one transaction.
              >-> Therefore I need Bean Managed Transactions
              >Since the bean does a call on two Database Connections it has to use
              >a
              >XA-Transaction.
              >-> Therefore I need XA-Transactions.
              >
              >Abstract
              >========
              >- I just can't get a User TransAction into the right Status it stays
              >in 'STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION' all the time
              >- Therefore the SQL Commands can be comitted 'java.sql.SQLException:
              >Does not support SQL execution with no global transaction'
              >- Therefore I can't do a rollback 'java.lang.IllegalStateException:
              >Transaction does not exist'
              >- Therefore I wrote this mail.
              >
              >I don't want to be a smart-"ass" writing such a detailed and indepth
              >mail. I just would like to show that I tried, and would like to have
              >some replies from you guys.
              >
              >Below are my configurations, code and logfiles.
              >
              >Thanx for taking your time and hope that the other people may learn
              >something as well.
              >
              >cu
              >
              >Stefan
              >
              >
              >Scenario
              >========
              >
              >used Software
              >-------------
              >Bea Weblogic (WL) 6.0 SPx (not real sure which SP i have)
              >Oracle 8.1.6 using the API-Version 8
              >
              >
              >I configured the system as follows:
              >(ofcourse I 'xxx'ed out all of the confidential data, sorry guys;-))
              >excerpt from:
              >
              >config.xml
              >----------
              ><JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
              >DriverName="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver" InitialCapacity="2"
              >LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="5" Name="oraclePool"
              >Properties="user=xxx;password=xxx;dll=ocijdbc8;protocol=thin"
              >RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
              >TestTableName="languages" URL="jdbc:oracle:thin:@xxx:1521:xxx "/>
              >
              ><!-- Since this is our Main Datasource I would not like to use a XA
              >Transaction due to performance Issues
              >and the TxDataSource:
              >-->
              >
              ><JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="true"
              >JNDIName="finstral.datasource.fbs" Name="finstral Content Datasource"
              >PoolName="oraclePool" Targets="fbsserver"/>
              >
              ><!-- no comment required -I hope.
              >Next comes the "special" Pool
              >-->
              >
              ><JDBCConnectionPool CapacityIncrement="5"
              >DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XADataSource" InitialCapacity="1"
              >LoginDelaySeconds="1" MaxCapacity="2" Name="oracleSecurityPool"
              >Properties="user=xxx;password=xxx;server=xxx.xxx.xxx"
              >RefreshMinutes="5" Targets="fbsserver" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
              >TestTableName="Users" SupportsLocalTransaction="true"/>
              >
              ><!-- Well since there can only be one none XARessourceManager involved
              >in a 2PC
              >(keyword: Two Phase Commit) I will have to use a XACapable Driver for
              >the other
              >Datasource. Due to all the bugs in the oracle.xxx driver. I'll be
              >using the jdriver for oci.
              >I activated 'SupportsLocalTransaction' hoping it would solve my
              >problem - without effect. I just left in there now, since it made
              >sense me. Not?
              >Again the TxDataSource:
              >-->
              >
              ><JDBCTxDataSource EnableTwoPhaseCommit="true"
              >JNDIName="finstral.datasource.fbssecurity" Name="finstral Security
              >Datasource" PoolName="oracleSecurityPool" Targets="fbsserver"/>
              >
              ><!-- The System starts right up and can locate the test tables and
              >everything. So I think all of this stuff is working here -->
              >
              >
              >
              >ejb-jar.xml
              >-----------
              ><ejb-jar>
              >     <enterprise-beans>
              >          <session>
              >               <ejb-name>TPCTestBean</ejb-name>
              >     
              ><home>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCHome</home>
              >     
              ><remote>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPC</remote>
              >     
              ><ejb-class>de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean</ejb-class>
              >               <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
              >               <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
              >          </session>
              >     </enterprise-beans>
              >     <assembly-descriptor/>
              ></ejb-jar>
              >
              ><!-- Originally I had the assembly-descriptor full of transaction
              >requirements. I thought since
              >the bean is handling all of the transaction stuff itself, it might get
              >confused by the 'container-transaction'
              >properties, and deleted them. Do I need them anyway?-->
              >
              >weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
              >--------------------
              ><weblogic-ejb-jar>
              >     <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
              >          <ejb-name>TPCTestBean</ejb-name>
              >          <stateless-session-descriptor/>
              >          <jndi-name>finstral/ejb/test_tpc</jndi-name>
              >     </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
              ></weblogic-ejb-jar>
              >
              ><!-- Nothing I have to explain here -->
              >
              >BeanCode (from the implementingBeanClass:
              >'de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean')
              >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
              >---------------------
              >
              > public void setupTables() throws RemoteException
              > {
              > UserTransaction tx = getTransaction();
              > //getTransaction calls: 'tx = sCtx.getUserTransaction()' and does
              >some errorhandling
              >
              > log.info("Die Transaktion vor den Connections: "+tx.toString());
              > //Sorry bout the German. You should get the Message though.
              > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor den Connections:
              >"+transactionStatus(tx));
              >
              > Connection conSecurity = getConnection(DATASOURCE_SECURITY, tx);
              > //gets a Connection via a DataSourceName from the JNDI tree
              > Connection conContent = getConnection(DATASOURCE_CONTENT, tx);
              >
              > log.info("Die frische Connection conSecurity: "+conSecurity);
              > log.info("Die frische Connection conContent: "+conContent);
              >
              > tearDownTable(conSecurity);
              > //Does nothing special
              > tearDownTable(conContent);
              >
              > log.info("Die Transaktion nach dem Teardown: "+tx.toString());
              > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Teardown:
              >"+transactionStatus(tx));
              >
              > Statement stmt = null;
              > try
              > {
              > stmt = conSecurity.createStatement();
              > //Well its getting interesting now.....
              >
              > log.info("Die Transaktion vor dem createtable: "+tx.toString());
              > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem createtable:
              >"+transactionStatus(tx));
              > log.info("Die Connection conSecurity vor dem createtable:
              >"+conSecurity);
              > log.info("Die Connection conContent vor dem createtable:
              >"+conContent);
              >
              > stmt.executeUpdate(CREATE_TABLE);
              > //above is the row 91 -> throws: 'java.sql.SQLException: Does
              >not support SQL execution with no global transaction'
              >
              > stmt.close();
              >
              > stmt = conContent.createStatement();
              > stmt.executeUpdate(CREATE_TABLE);
              > stmt.close();
              > commitTransaction(tx);
              > }
              > catch (SQLException sqle)
              > {
              > log.error("Konnte kein table init machen", sqle);
              > rollbackTransaction(tx);
              > //The Code for this method is below
              > throw new EJBException(sqle);
              > }
              > finally
              > {
              > closeConnection(conSecurity);
              > closeConnection(conContent);
              > }
              > }
              >
              > protected void rollbackTransaction(UserTransaction tx)
              > {
              > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem Rollback:
              >"+transactionStatus(tx));
              > log.info("Die Transaktion vor dem Rollback: "+tx.toString());
              > try
              > {
              > tx.rollback();
              > //above is row 200 -> throws: 'java.lang.IllegalStateException:
              >Transaction does not exist'
              > log.info("Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Rollback:
              >"+transactionStatus(tx));
              > log.info("Die Transaktion nach dem Rollback: "+tx.toString());
              > }
              > catch (Exception e)
              > {
              > log.error("Konnte die Transaktion nicht backrollen.", e);
              > throw new EJBException(e);
              > }
              > }
              >
              >Log Excerpt
              >===========
              >INFO setupTables() (66) - Die Transaktion vor den Connections:
              >[email protected]
              >INFO setupTables() (67) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor den Connections:
              >STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
              >INFO setupTables() (72) - Die frische Connection conSecurity:
              >weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@7c6daa
              >INFO setupTables() (73) - Die frische Connection conContent:
              >weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@3b425
              >INFO setupTables() (78) - Die Transaktion nach dem Teardown:
              >[email protected]
              >INFO setupTables() (79) - Der Transaktionsstatus nach dem Teardown:
              >STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
              >INFO setupTables() (86) - Die Transaktion vor dem createtable:
              >[email protected]
              >INFO setupTables() (87) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem createtable:
              >STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
              >INFO setupTables() (88) - Die Connection conSecurity vor dem
              >createtable: weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@7c6daa
              >INFO setupTables() (89) - Die Connection conContent vor dem
              >createtable: weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialConnection@3b425
              >ERROR setupTables() (101) - Konnte kein table init machen
              >java.sql.SQLException: Does not support SQL execution with no global
              >transaction
              >     at
              >weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.XAConnection.beforeExecute(XAConnection.java:137)
              >     at
              >weblogic.jdbc.oci.xa.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:112)
              >     at weblogic.jdbc.jta.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:185)
              >     at
              >weblogic.jdbc.rmi.internal.StatementImpl.executeUpdate(StatementImpl.ja
              v
              >a:42)
              >     at
              >weblogic.jdbc.rmi.SerialStatement.executeUpdate(SerialStatement.java:54
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.setupTables(TPCBean.ja
              v
              >a:91)
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanImpl.setupTables(TPCBea
              n
              >Impl.java:130)
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanEOImpl.setupTables(TPCB
              e
              >anEOImpl.java:64)
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.TwoPhaseCommitUnitTest.setUp(TwoPhaseC
              o
              >mmitUnitTest.java:51)
              >     at
              >org.apache.commons.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runBareServerTest(AbstractTe
              s
              >tCase.java:297)
              >     at
              >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.callTestMethod(Servl
              e
              >tTestCaller.java:148)
              >     at
              >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.doTest(ServletTestCa
              l
              >ler.java:199)
              >     at
              >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestRedirector.doPost(ServletTe
              s
              >tRedirector.java:149)
              >     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
              >     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
              >     at
              >weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl
              >java:213)
              >     at
              >weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServ
              l
              >etContext.java:1265)
              >     at
              >weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl
              >java:1631)
              >     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
              >     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
              >INFO rollbackTransaction() (196) - Der Transaktionsstatus vor dem
              >Rollback: STATUS_NO_TRANSACTION
              >INFO rollbackTransaction() (197) - Die Transaktion vor dem Rollback:
              >[email protected]
              >ERROR rollbackTransaction() (206) - Konnte die Transaktion nicht
              >backrollen.
              >java.lang.IllegalStateException: Transaction does not exist
              >     at
              >weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.rollback(Transacti
              o
              >nManagerImpl.java:228)
              >     at
              >weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.rollback(Transacti
              o
              >nManagerImpl.java:222)
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.rollbackTransaction(TP
              C
              >Bean.java:200)
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBean.setupTables(TPCBean.ja
              v
              >a:102)
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanImpl.setupTables(TPCBea
              n
              >Impl.java:130)
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.tpcbean.TPCBeanEOImpl.setupTables(TPCB
              e
              >anEOImpl.java:64)
              >     at
              >de.sitewaerts.futuna.common.test.TwoPhaseCommitUnitTest.setUp(TwoPhaseC
              o
              >mmitUnitTest.java:51)
              >     at
              >org.apache.commons.cactus.AbstractTestCase.runBareServerTest(AbstractTe
              s
              >tCase.java:297)
              >     at
              >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.callTestMethod(Servl
              e
              >tTestCaller.java:148)
              >     at
              >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestCaller.doTest(ServletTestCa
              l
              >ler.java:199)
              >     at
              >org.apache.commons.cactus.server.ServletTestRedirector.doPost(ServletTe
              s
              >tRedirector.java:149)
              >     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
              >     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
              >     at
              >weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl
              >java:213)
              >     at
              >weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServ
              l
              >etContext.java:1265)
              >     at
              >weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl
              >java:1631)
              >     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
              >     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
              >
              >
              >CONCLUSION
              >==========
              >I'm going nuts.
              >I just don't get it.
              >The transaction is the same. I don't change the Connection. I start
              >the Transaction at the beginning before I do anything!
              >Please guys help me out.
              >Thx alot.
              >
              >Stefan "it's three o'clock in the morning, my girlfriend left me, and
              >my only friend is that stupid linux pinguine" Siprell
              >Software-Development
              ><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
              ><sitewaerts> GmbH
              >Hebelstraße 15
              >D-76131 Karlsruhe
              >
              >Tel: +49 (721) 920 918 22
              >Fax: +49 (721) 920 918 29
              >http://www.sitewaerts.de
              >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
              >
              >
              >
              

  • About Container-managed Transactions and Bean-managed Transactions

    as the document of weblogic7.0 describe the differents of Container-managed
              Transactions and Bean-managed Transactions,and in the document,It tell us
              details of using Bean-managed Transactions,such as \:
              import javax.naming.*;import javax.transaction.UserTransaction;.....
              import java.sql.*;import java.util.*;
              UserTransaction tx = (UserTransaction)
              ctx.lookup("javax.transaction.UserTransaction");tx.begin();
              tx.commit() //or tx.rollback
              but how to use Container-managed Transactions?
              what is EJB's deployment descriptor? can someone tell me?
              i wonder someone will show me an example of how to use Container-managed
              Transactions.
              thanks
              fish
              

    Many if not all of the WLS EJB examples use container-managed
              transactions. That's a good place to start.
              I'd also recommend that you pick up a decent EJB book. There's several
              on the market right now.
              -- Rob
              fish wrote:
              > <ejb-jar>
              > <enterprise-beans>
              > <session>
              > <ejb-name>testbean</ejb-name>
              > <home>test.test.TestHome</home>
              > <remote>test.test.Test</remote>
              > <ejb-class>test.test.TestBean</ejb-class>
              > <session-type>Stateful</session-type>
              > <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
              > </session>
              > </enterprise-beans>
              >
              > <assembly-descriptor>
              > <container-transaction>
              > <method>
              > <ejb-name>EmployeeRecord</ejb-name>
              > <method-name>*</method-name>
              > </method>
              > <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
              > </container-transaction>
              > </assembly-descriptor>
              > </ejb-jar>
              > ----------------------------------------------
              > seems i have to write ejb-jar.xml like this,am i right?
              > what about <ejb-client-jar>? is it needed in this xml file?
              >
              > thanks
              >
              > fish
              >
              >
              

  • Assign User Profiles and Web Interface Transactions to Users

    Hi EM Gurus,
    Has anyone worked with not standard scenarios in SCEM?
    They are working well but I can't access them on interface web.
    In selection page (search page after logon), where choose tracking scenarios, only standard scenarios appear although I have assigned both scenarios to the user and made same configuration; Assigned and Defined Web Interface Transactions, Configured Fields for User Profiles, Defined User Profiles, Assigned User Profiles and Web Interface Transactions to Users.
    But only Standard Scenarios appear as choice of tracking scenarios that are displayed to the user as a dropdown box on the selection screen after logging on to the Web interface.
    Has anyone accessed not standard scenarios on interface web??
    Help, please!
    Thanks a lot.
    Rodrigo Freitas

    Hello Rodrigo,
    if you have assigned the scenarios to your user in transaction /SAPTRX/UCUSER you must go to the admin page and reload the profile manager.
    /admin in the URL of the WCL instead /ehsearch.
    Afterwards you should see them also in the drop-down box.
    Best regards,
    Steffen

  • Is it possible to lock and unlock a transaction?

    Hi SDN,
    Is it possible to lock and unlock a standard transaction( for eg VA02 ) through my program?( i am creating a customized version of standard transaction ) I want to lock the transaction for my user-id and then i will update the values in that transaction and finally i will unlock it.
    I got the FM for locking at the database level.is there is any FM to lock and unlock the transaction?

    Hi,
    It may not be the best way, but maybe you could use the functionality behind transaction code SM01. Here you can lock/unlock the transaction code. If you look at the program, all it is really doing is updating table TSTC field CINFO. CINFO = 80 when unlocked, CINFO = A0 when locked. You could just update the field accordingly and then call this function module right after.
    * For locking
    CALL FUNCTION 'RSAU_WRITE_SM01_LOG'
      EXPORTING
        TCODE = TSTC-TCODE
        LOCK = 'X'.
    * For unlocking
    CALL FUNCTION 'RSAU_WRITE_SM01_LOG'
      EXPORTING
        TCODE = TSTC-TCODE
        UNLOCK = 'X'.
    Regards,
    Ferry Lianto

  • Oracle 9i and Oracle 10g transaction log shipping

    Hi,
    We have Oracle 9i and we use the transaction log shipping mechanism to transport our transaction log files to our DR site. We then import these against the database at the remote site.
    Our telecomms infrastructure is pretty limited so this is a manual process.
    We are looking at upgrading to 10G. I believe that with 10g you have to use dataguard, or is there a way to mimic the behavior of 9i that would allow us to transport and apply the transaction logs manually?
    Thanks
    Andrew

    You can try setting the SGA to a low value and bring up both the databases. I don't think it should be too slow provided you are not running other windows programs.
    If you are really interested in trying out new products you can also explore the option of installing VMware, creating virtual machines & installing Linux, and then playing with the different Oracle products. Doing this will at least keep your main windows operating system clean.
    You may want to check out my blog post on Build your own oracle test lab
    Cheers !!!
    Ashish Agarwal
    http://www.asagarwal.com

  • AR - How to Complete and Incomplete a Transaction

    Hi,
    We have a requirement, where after a transaction is created by AutoInvoice, we want to make the Transaction Incomplete, so that it cannot be posted to GL. Send the Transaction for some approval and once approval is obtained, make the Transaction complete, so that the normal Transaction process can continue.
    We could not find any API to make a Transaction Complete or Incomplete. Can somebody suggest how to achieve this?
    Thanks.
    Prabhat

    I tryied to use in the client the statement EntityTransaction transaction = myBean.getTransact(); but I receive the EJBException: Cannot use resource level transactions with a container managed EntityManager
    I just need to start a transaction something like this: transaction.begin(); and finish the transaction, something like this: transaction.commit();
    Does anybody can help?

  • Any FM available for partial payment for FB05 and F-36 transaction?

    Dear All,
    Is there any function module available that can post the partial payment for FB05 and F-36 transactions? Please let me know if any function module doing the same. I have searched in SDN but could not find any.
    Best wishes,
    Atanu

    Dear All,
    BDC is giving some issue. When we click on partial payment tab, then the accounting document numbers are coming haphazardly. One partial payment document has two accounting docs, in one of which parial payment amount has to be filled up.  We are unable to interpret the documents through BDC. Please can you help?
    Best wishes,
    Atanu

  • 40655SQL error forced rollback: clear form and re-enter transaction

    Hello ,
    I have ORACLE 10G & Forms 6i on Windows server 2008 . When I open the forms for some work , it give me error in few minis.
    FRM-40655: SQL error forced rollback: clear form and re-enter transaction.
    I have not done anything unusual in form design. it was working properly from a long time.
    Yesterday i set the default profile to idle_time = 20. Will that make any problem ???
    I checked my Alert Log but no sign of any deadlock in it, or any other unusual activity ....
    What is the solution ???
    Thanks in advance ..
    Edited by: DBA4 on Jul 17, 2010 11:43 AM

    Thanks for the reply ......
    I would like to tell some more details here.
    Previously i wanted to set an IDLE_TIME limit of 20 mins for all users in the DEFAULT profile.
    So i did the process for the same...
    I set the resource_limit parameter to true & then altered the default profile's idle_time to 20.
    soon after that all the users who were accessing the database got this error while working ....
    SQL error forced rollback: clear form and re-enter transaction.
    In our case one user is opened & accessed by many people.
    for ex - a user called UERP is open at Machine1 & also at Machine2. So at a time a single user can be opened at multiple sessions.
    can this be the problem for forced rollback ???
    My basic need is , i want to set the IDLE_TIME to 20 min but users should not face forced rollback error ????
    what should i do ???
    thanks in advance ....
    Edited by: DBA4 on Jul 19, 2010 2:28 PM

  • FRM-40655: SQL error forced rollback: clear form and re-enter transaction.

    Hello ,
    I have ORACLE 10G & Forms 6i on Windows server 2008 . When I open the forms for some work , it give me error in few minis.
    FRM-40655: SQL error forced rollback: clear form and re-enter transaction.
    I have not done anything unusual in form design. it was working properly from a long time.
    Yesterday i set the default profile to idle_time = 20. Will that make any problem ???
    I checked my Alert Log but no sign of any deadlock in it, or any other unusual activity ....
    What is the solution ???
    Thanks in advance ..

    This happens due to dead lock situation
    To avoid this problem, add NOWAIT option to the UPDATE and DELETE statements, which returns ORA-00054 error, trap this error and display user defined message like 'The record is being accessed and try after some time'.
    This even improves the performance
    because no process waits for the locks preventing dead locks.
    If it is due to the UPDATE's or DELETE's with base table blocks in the form, in the PRE-UPDATE and PRE-DELETE triggers write SELECT statements to select the particular row with FOR UPDATE NO WAIT option. Handle by trapping the ORA-00054 error

  • Is it possible to see how many COGI errors I have cleared in previous month and in which transaction I can able to see that record?

    Is it possible to see how many COGI errors I have cleared in previous month and in which transaction I can able to see that record?

    Mukundan,
    Refer Below SAP Note 1868084 - FAQ: Transaction COGI
    Question:
    Is it possible to log the actions in transaction COGI?
                  Answer:
    SAP Note 309050 provides a modification but it can only be used temporarily. Also refer to SAP Note 1894587 in this context. It provides a report for displaying and deleting the data records in the log table AFFWPRO.
    BR
    KK

  • Cost Owned Transactions and Cost Derived Transactions

    Hi,
    Need to Know the details about Cost Owned Transactions and Cost Derived Transactions in 'Periodic Item Cost Change Report'.
    Regards,
    Abdul Wasi

    Hi,
    In status control the setting is status of plan and hence the derived transactions will always be generated in planned status and you have to fix them through TPM18.
    In order to post it through TBB1 itself, the control setting should have same status option.  But check with the business also whether this is not going to have any other effect because this is at the central company code and valuation area level.  All derived transactions will have the same status of the operative transactions itself.
    Regards,
    Ravi

Maybe you are looking for