FICO Issue

Hi All
I am working on MEDIA project and it gets upgraded from 4.6 to ECC6 but after upgradation when we are generating the billing doc. at the same time FI doc. should also generate simultaneously and it's not gets generated when i am using the Tcode jhf1[for billing doc].
After executing jhf1, i am getting the pop up that [notes have been generated, please check the log].
Message no.JH423
Diagnosis
The following have been generated as log notes for the current collective processing run:
0001 Error messages
0000 Warnings
0000 information
0000 Sucess messages
Procedure
Please check the log notes
When I am clicking on notes list , I am getting the error:
Account determination for the doc. items contains error
Program which is showing on the screen is-RJHFAKDI
Kindly do the needful << Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>.
Please let me know the solution << Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>.
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 19, 2010 3:21 PM

u need to create one transaction in FICO with all line items included within this transaction...Now when u click on each individual line item, it shows the details...

Similar Messages

FICO issues

Respected gurus,
i have some issues,
1what are the basic needs for electronic BRS
2 relationship b/n work in process and work in progress in sap
thanks in advance
jana

Hi Jana,
Basic needs for EBS is transaction types of Bank and customized SAP must be same. Example every day end or Month end business can download the statement from bank website,which same statement having transaction type (type of transaction example cheque reced,cheque issue,Bill recd,bill issue) ,value date and amount with narration. You need to assign the same transaction types in customization and also you need to maintain the Bnak clearing accounts.
Business can make posting with using of Bank clearing accounts for all transactions in SAP.Main Bnak accoiunt would be debit or credit ,while execut the BRS in system. Same time Bank clearing accont nulify with Main bank account.
Best Rgds
Suma

Report issue , logical name of the system has been changed

Hi
Recently our system has been upgraded to ECC5.0. In a particular report while drilling down we get error. The error says the original doc can not be shown as it belongs to logical system ( DRH-123) . Now we know that this logical name of the system was in old box . The new logical name is DRH-100 . We are saying it's a basis issue and the basis team is saying it's FICO issue.Has any body encountered this type of problem. ? In my report i have never mentioned logical name of the system.Hence unable to understand it. But so far what I have understood , that the each box has been partioned and given a system name which is called logical name.Now that logical name they have changed in new box.My initial response was change the logical name but basis says that is a big task and more over it has been a while when they changed it.
Gurus, Kindly shed some light on this mess.
Thanks in advance
Satya

Which report are you pulling out? T-code?
This link has some that may help you:
www.scribd.com/doc/24447/SAP-R3-IDoc-Cookbook-for-EDI-and-Interfaces-by-Axel-Angeli
Do CTRL+F to find Logical Systems
If the link doesnt work use the following keywords and google it, shoose second result: EDI IDOCS interface axel angeli sap
You may also want to get in touch with the person who was involved in developing LS. Talk with your ABAPer, they normally have an idea about these things (well atleast my ABAPer knows!)
Message was edited by:
Vj

SAP : ECC 6.0 Module : Production and MM Issue : Monthly and Yearly targets

SAP : ECC 6.0
Module : FICO
Issue : Payment Mode and Type
Domain : Chemicals
How to Trap Bank Receipts / Bank Payments Mode of payment and doc no
Ex : Any bank Receipt We need to enter the Mode of Receipt : Chq/ DD/ Order and Also need to enter the Instrument details
In SAP standard F-28 form shows does not have the details to enter.
What is the best approach to trap this in case of receipts and payments.

Sreekanth
Thanks for the reply
If you want to maintain Cheque no., DD, etc.. You can enter those in assignment field or text field, While Document display you can see it in report.
So this assignment filed can be used for All the DD-Chq details ?
The information can queried on the Assignment field also ?

Advice: CC or Installment Loan

I need some sound advice. I am trying to figure out the best approach to my only financial/Fico issue. I have an AMEX card with a $11,000 CL at 12.5%. . I have thought about asking for a CLI. I owe a balance of $8,000 on it. My intention is to have it paid off or nearly paid off by the end of the year through monthly payments. I don't have any pressing concern right now, but I do intend to buy a house next year about this time. Questions: 1) Should I apply for a card that I could expect to get a high CL with a BT of 0.00%? or 2) Apply for an Installment loan through Lending Club? I have a guaranteed 5.99% offer with them for up to $35,000. 3) Or should I just continue paying it down as I have done, and not do either above option? My FICO 8 scores are: EX: 771, TU: 761, and EQ: 743The FICO simulator shows if the balance (my outstanding revolving debt) on the AMEX card is paid off my scores would go to 809 on EX, 801 on TU and 793 on EQ.The only thing I have is a car note for a new Jeep I bought lat November. Thanks for ALL your help!

Gridium wrote:
The way I personally would play that scenario would be to pay down the Amex. The reason is a new account could hit your average age of account, possibly significantly depending on how many accounts in total are on your CR. I don't know exactly what that would translate into in terms of Fico hit and mortgage rate, but I would be hesitant to risk the possibility of a better(even if only slightly better) mortgage rate in a situation where I'm capable of just paying down a balance in a few months. Getting the best possible mortgage rate is going to be a much bigger money saver over the long run, than getting a 0% APR on a relatively small short term debt that it sounds like you're set to pay off in 4 or 5 months anyway. I would also, if I hadn't already in that scenario, talk to my credit union's lending department(or whoever I was hoping to finance my house through) about my situation and get some feedback from them, ideally after providing them with a copy of my full credit report(to avoid them doing a hard pull).I would concur. Just pay it down normally. At best you save a few hundred bucks by getting a loan or 0% transfer card, but you risk lowering your scores - possibly below a rate threshold.

Order Settlement to another B area cost objects

Dear all
In my requirement We are carrying the work at one Business area on behalf of another business area. The maintenance order has some expenses amount,after completion of the job i need to settle into another business areas cost objects. But sap is giving the error only. Is ot possible?

Thenna,
Message to all: you really should get an OSS logon - its free and would save us all a lot of time...
However, this looks like a FICO issue... and here is the OSS Note text:
During settlement error message KD256 is output
"There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
The error message and the long text do not supply sufficient information on the causes for the error message.
Additional key words
CJ88, CJ8G, VA88, KO88, KO8G, CO88
Cause and prerequisites
Preconditions for message KD256 are:
1. The sender carries a results analysis key
and
2. it is
a) a sender with revenue
or
b) a production order with FUL rule to product which in the settlement period has neither the status DLV nor the status TECO
or
c) a WBS element which does not have the status TECO
or
d) an order, which in the settlement period has neither the status DLV nor the status TECO, and the indicator 'WIP on dependent orders' is in the results analysis version.
In these cases, only data from accrual calculation is settled. In the cases b) to d), no actual costs are settled to the receiver of the settlement rule.
The error message is now output
1. if no accrual calculation has been carried out,
or
2. the accrued data have already been settled
or
3. the flag 'Settlement to FI' has not been set in any of the results analysis versions
or
4. no posting rules have been defined for any of the results analysis categories.
Solution
1. Check for the cases b), c) and d) whether the sender already had the status GLV or TECO in the settlement period, that is, whether the delivery date or the date of the technical closure is prior to the posting date of the settlement. If this is not the case, the system continues to determine and settle in period WIP.
Note: Prior to Release 4.0, the system did not update the date of the technical closure with WBS elements. This is why the date of the technical closure was not checked in Release 3.0/3.1. This was an error in Release 3.0/3.1.
2. Check the settings in the Customizing of accrual calculation, that is, check the flags 'Settlement to FI' in the results analysis version and check the posting rules.
3. Check the previous settlements for the sender. For this use the function 'Extras -> Previous settlements' on the initial screen of the settlement.
4. If necessary, start accrual calculation for the sender again and start the settlement again afterwards.

What is function consultant role in technical up grade

Hi All,
Please share your experiences on upgrade project.
What is function consultant role in technical up grade.
Aditya.

Check this answered links
Technical Upgrade
Technical and Functional Upgrade
Check also this links module wise,
Role of MM consultant in Upgrade Project
Technical Upgrade
FICO Issues while Technical upgrade frm 4.6c to ECC6
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on May 10, 2010 4:14 PM

Issue at Posting to FICO

Hi
Iam new to SAP-HR, I had an issue at posting to FICO. I had some wage types like basic, HRA,convayence, PT,ESI,PF ...... i want to create Symbolic account for these. I want to know what symbolic is related to what? i,e for basic what symbolic account we have to create are link(name of symbolic account).
Thanks in Advance
Sudha

Hi,
Symbolic aacounts are theones which act as a bridge between wagetyes on the HR side and GL accounts on the FI side.
TO get al ist of all the symbolic accounts and or to create one you can got to the following IMG node.
Payroll>Posting to financial accounting>activities in the HR system
Now to relate the wagetypes to a symbolic account , you need to identify what kind of amount gets into wagetypes.
A simp;le example...
consider Basic Pay (M002) is 1000
employee Taxes--200
/559(amount paid to bank)--800
Now since we are passing info to the FI system, we need to think from the employers perspective.
fom the employer's perspective, basic pay to an employee is a expense to the company.
hence the basic pay should be assigned to a expense account.
So in the system ,we pick out a symbolic account of type expense and assign the basic pay wagetype to it.
alternatively navigate to Payroll>Posting to financial accounting>activities in the AC system
then ensure the symbolic account is assigned to a valid GL expense account.
the employee taxes and amount paid to bank are amounts that are going out to be paid to the tax authorities and the bank.
Hence we assign this to a symbolic account of type balance sheet.
If we have a employer contribution wagetype, it will have to be assigned to both an expense account as it is an expense to the company and also a balance sheet account as it has to be paid to an employee or suthority according to the requirement.
Kindly let me know if you have any further queries.
thank you,
Jose

Real life technical and business issues--FICO--implementation

Hello,
Can someone please give some real-life Technical and Business issues and problems faced by FICO consultant in different-different phases of implementation (asap)? please provide from basic to critical examples?
Thanks,
Amit
Moderator: Please, respect the rules of the forum

What you are asking is very project specific.
Try to do the following:
1. Ask for the detailed business requirements
2. Ask for the design documents. Usually, there will be bunch of documents that got documented when the project team made the design. There must be documents like conceptual / high level design, detailed / low level design, ABAP specifications, report specifications, etc.
3. The design documents will contian other things, DATA FLOW DIAGRAM. Here in this diagram, you will see where the data comes and how it gets processed and transformed when the data reaches BW.
4. Ask for your access to the develoment system or the sandbox ( where you can play around without affecting anybody's work).
5. With the data fliow, you keep reviewing the objects in BW and also in the source system.
6. Even if you dont get access to dev or sandbox, you cans till view the objects in display mode.
7. Open the query designer and see how the variables are defined and how formulas are defined and how the restricted key figures are defined.
8. In production system, go to SM37 and see the jobs that are scheduled.
9. Try and co ordinate weekly calls with your team members and this is the place where ideas and problems will be shared.
If you have specific questions ot need some specific help, dont hesitate to send me a note. My email is [email protected]
Best luck,
Ravi Thothadri

Typical FICO End-User Issues

Sap Gurus,
What are the major issues (& their solutions) faced by end user while using the SAP FICO module?
Also, please let me know some issues (& their solutions) faced by end users while using AP-MM.
Thanks alot in advance.
--SJ

Hi,
Issues in FICO revolve around Master Data setup, minor enhancements by changes to config, design of new reports (ABAP or Report Painter), some analysis issues etc.,
AP & MM would revolve around F110, MIGO, MIRO, Master Data setup and Integrations issues.
Rgds.

FICO : Asset Accounting - Depreciation Run Issue

Dear Friends,
I have an issue in asset accounting.
Let me explain the actual background of this issue.
1. I created a new company code(2000) by copying the existing one(1000 along with the closed year 2009
2. After that when i was trying to post acquisition for an asset i got the below error
You cannot post to asset in company code 2000 fiscal year 2011
3. Then i closed the year 2010 and opened 2011, it allowed me to post in the month of june
4. Now i am trying to run the depreciation for june, its giving the below error.
According to posting cycle, you should post period 001 next
5. What could be the reason for this error , is it the correct procedure what i am doing it now?
Please help if someone has an idea about that
Thanks ,
Perumal.

Hi,
You can get the solution if you double click the error message.
Please note that depreciation of current month can only be posted if the depreciation dycles till the previous month is completed. Coming to your case, you have opened the year 2011 and trying to post depreciation for period 6. You need to run the depreciation cycles from period 1 to 5 before trying to post for period 6.
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T.

Support issues of fico

1.what is master data creation problem in sap for fi/co module and why this problem will occur and how to resolve this issue in the real time.
2.what is automatic payment problem in sap for fi/co module and why this problem will occur and how to resolve this issue in the real time.
3.what is Smart form changes in SAP in fi/co module and how this issue will be resolved and why this problem will occur.
4.what is depreciation key changes in SAP in fi/co module and how this issue will be resolved and why this problem will occur.
thanks and regards
fazal baig
Edited by: fazal baig on Feb 20, 2008 7:19 PM

Dear fazal
The questions you asked are all so generic and I dont think anybody can give you a solution for such questions.
To take an example of your first question "what is master data creation problem", do you think the creation of master data (be it FI or any other module) could not be achieved just because of one problem. It could be due to so many reasons and unless you come out clearly, it will be difficult for the members to give a solution.
By the by please post question one by one in a separate thread so that it will be easy for others to respond accordingly.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Payment Proposal Issue in SAP FICO-Account Payables

Hi ,
I am getting issue in Payment Proposal
When i am putting some of the values and genrating report for vendors in some of the currency then on doing simulation the complete list is coming in all currencies instead of one currency.
How do i sort the same?
Whats the step by step process?
Thanks
Vivek

Hi,
Your query is not clear..if can be more specific than it would help you in resolving the issue. I guess you are getting all currencies getting generated in the payment output file. If you have listed out eg. 5 different currencies in the bank determination tab of payment program configuration (FBZP) and you have invoices with different currencies than the output file will have different currencies as per invoice currency.
Cheers!
Sundar

Issue : HR-FICO Integration

Hi all,
Does any one know why does a posting document is being created for results with a huge retro and has no payment?
Thanks in advance,
Dolly
Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 20, 2010 11:19 AM

HI all,
Is it possible to reverse a posting document for an employee whose latest result has a retro result posted to FI? If it is, then how do we reverse it?
Please respond. Thanks for your assitance.
Dolly
Edited by: DollyShar on Feb 22, 2010 2:06 PM

Cost Center assign Profit Center Issues

Hi Controlling Expert,
i have one issues regarding, Cost Center assign to Profit Center
wht happened , we have made MIS Report Thru Report Painter KE80, we have map based on   Primary Cost Element, at the time of Business Transaction, we have capture the Finance Cost center i.e FI000, Marketing Cost center i.e MK000 , HR Cost Center i,e HR000 and assign the same cost center FI000 to Profit Center i.e FI000 also same name, respectively. in MIS report there is two Head i.e Sustaining Cost and Development Cost ,where we have to capture only Cost center for Sustaining Cost related to display i.e FI000, MK000 and HR000. KE80 report belongs to Profit Center wise you can see the Report. But same FI000, MK000 and HR000 also updated related with business transaction and capture above cost center like in depreciation GL Amount 1000 cost center FI000 and sustaining cost also updated the same amount 1000 because we have assign FI000, i.e wrong . last 3 months post the amount now wht should I do for not updated sustaining cost, as I understand , should be delete sustaining Cost as well Development, and later on we can take report from KSB1 for FI000, MK000 and HR000, for management purpose, so if I cannot assign profit center FI000 to Cost Center .kindly correct me whether ryt or wrong. Coz Fianance, HR cost and marketing is only cost center. not suppose to assigh profit center, in this case how Profit Center removed from Cost center. kindly let me knw, or give me other option.
wen we see the report same Profit Center showing two times along with amount i.e wrong coz of Sustaining Cost we have assign Profit Center
in this report particulars are Below
Revenue : Relevant GL ( At time of Business Transaction we have captured the Relevant Profit Center i.e Finished Product i.e R100: RA Tube
and RA Tube R100 assign with same Cost Center R100.
B.Material Cost : Relevant Primary Cost Element
Manpower      : same like Above
2.Energy            : same like Above
3.Consumption   : same Like Above
Conversion Cost (1+2+3)
Sustaining Cost   : Here we have given Profit Center i.e FI000, MK000 and HR000 these profit center assign
Development Cost : Here we have given profit Cente EN000
Profit      (A-B-C-D-E-F)
G.Depreciation : Relevant Primary Primary Cost Element
Financing Cost : Relevant Primary Cost Element
I. Other Income/Loss : Relevant Primary Cost Element
PBT : (F-G-H-I)
Kind regards
Pranav Kr. Gupta
SAP FICO Consultant.

Hi Pranav
You are logging same issue twice. I didnt see any difference in the two threads though.
If its the same issue, request you not to repeat this in future.
KE80 report two times value effected
Regards
Mustafa

FICO Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for