FM Error: No assignment object determined for P100 / 457000
Dear GURUS,
we are facing the problem while changing the PO and system is giving the error message as CB item 00010: No assignment object determined for P100 / 457000
we checked in FM9K and reconstructed in FMBV and run the report .
pl suggest...
Message no. BP748
Diagnosis
The budget structure for the combination funds center P100/commitment item 457000/fund in line item 00010 does not contain a superior assignment object in the commitment budget.
Also, if you have only assigned one assignment object in the commitment budget, you must create assignment objects in such a way that every assignable element has ONE assignment object in the upward path in the commitment budget.
System Response
Posting not made.
Procedure
1. Define a superior element in the budget structure or define the BS element itself as an assignment object in the commitment budget.
2. Check your definition.
3. Reconstruct the assigned values for the fund and year where you have changed the assignment object definition.
Regards,
Venkat
Hi,
Please check the Note 1080301
Summary
Symptom
You receive the error message BP746 or any similar message (see below).
Other terms
BP 746 - BP746 - BP 747 - BP747 - BP745 - BP 745 - BP748 - BP 748
Reason and Prerequisites
You use the functionality of assignment objects in the budget structure for Former Budgeting
Solution
The functionality of the assignment object is not generally released for customers.
Customers who want to use this functionality must first contact SAP consulting, if they are allowed to do so.
If you do not need or know this functionality, then you must update the budget structure (transaction code FM9K) and remove the definition of all assignment objects. Sometimes, the corresponding columns are hidden in the transactions FM9L or FM9K. If this is the case, you should first activate them in the table control settings (right-upper button). The columns in FM9K and FM9L have the titles "CmA" and "PmA".
If you use a complex budget structure, the easiest way to detect these assignment objects will to search in table BPCJ for entries with the field WRTTP equal to 72 or 46. As well you can use table BPCK which tells you whether assignment objects are used or not, by filtering entries with the field WRTTP equal to 72 or 46.
After removing all combinations detected in tables BPCJ or BPCK using transaction code FM9K, you must reconstruct availability control, by means of transaction code FMBV.
Note
Problems with assignment objects are detected by the report BPCARRC0.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.
Similar Messages
-
PB item 00001: No assignment object determined for
Dear All
PB item 00001: No assignment object determined for
We are getting attached error in our system continuously.We do not know
why this is coming.
regards,
Edited by: Sagar on Apr 29, 2009 12:43 PMDear Sagar,
If you use a complex budget structure, the easiest way to detect these assignment objects will to search in table BPCJ for entries with the field WRTTP equal to 72 or 46. As well you can use table BPCK which tells you whether assignment objects are used or not, by filtering entries with the field WRTTP equal to 72 or 46.
After removing all combinations detected in tables BPCJ or BPCK using transaction code FM9K, you must reconstruct availability control, by means of transaction code FMBV.
If not solved then please refer note number 1080301
Regards,
Abhijit
Edited by: Abhijit Joshi on Apr 29, 2009 12:47 PM -
ERROR - JBO-25005: Object name for type View Object is invalid
Hi All,
I am getting this error "JBO-25005: Object name for type View Object is invalid" while executing my VO query in Controller code. Can any one please tell me the reason behind this error?
I am creating a VO dynamically and .xml file of a VO is placed in a proper directly. Please let me know some inputs to resolve this.
Thanks & Regards,
-AbmI found the below explanation for the error mentioned. Check if your package name, Object names confirm to the standard specified
JBO-25005: InvalidObjNameException
Cause: An attempt has been made to associate a business component name with an object for which it is not valid.
Action: The name should be a valid Java identifier with no spaces or punctuation. Names are of the format myProjectPackage.BusinessPackage.BusinessComponent -
[Error] No timing pattern determined for horizon in /SAPAPO/SEQ1
Hi Experts,
I'm trying to use transaction /SAPAPO/SEQ1 for Model Mix Planning (Sequencing) and I get this error message :
No timing pattern determined for horizon 2010/07/09 11:00:00 to 2010/07/14 19:00:00
Message no. /SAPAPO/SEQ130
Can't find anything on it on the Web or OSS.
Does anybody ever had this error ?
Thanks,
MarcHi Ranjini,
Please look into the following
1) Customer master data is fully maintained
2) Customer number ranges are fully defined in customisation
3) Customer address details are maintained
4) Is there any special characters used while defining customer data or customer
number like $, #,[ etc.,?
5) Customer int models are active in SCM side prior to IDOC processing (including
customer, demand, stocks etc)
Please confirm your findings
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran. -
Error in profit center determination for settled vendor down payments
Hello All,
When we try to settle vendor down payments an error is detected for the profit center determination .
The settled down payment is found on the dummy profit center instead of the profit center of the original invoice. This means that the reporting of oustanding payables per profit center is wrong
When you only see the invoice and not the settled down payment which should reduce you outstanding debt (down payment already paid).
Can any one help in this matter
Regards
ArunHi,
Check the document splitting configuration. Advances to vendors recon.. account should be assigned as category 'Vendor 'special gl transaction''.
Check the document type 'KA' transaction as '0300'... or unspecified posting.
Thanks,
padmaja N -
Compiler error type of object in for (Class obj : Items) - why?
Hi all,
I'm new to Java generics and am in the process of converting some
legacy code. I have encountered a particular error which I do not
understand the reason for, since I think the compiler has enough
information about the code to work out type information. The following
code shows a test class which demonstrates this error:
import java.util.Collection;
public class Test
interface Base {}
static class Impl1 implements Base{}
public <T extends Base> Collection<T> getCollection(Class<? extends Base> cls)
return null;
void someMethod()
for ( Impl1 obj : getCollection( Impl1.class ))
// *** compiler complains about the line above ***
// compiler says:
// Test.java:22: incompatible types
// found : Test.Base
// required: Test.Impl1
// for ( Impl1 obj : getCollection( Impl1.class ))
// ^
void someMethod2()
Collection<Impl1> coln = getCollection(Impl1.class);
for (Impl1 obj : coln)
// do something here with obj
}Why should the compiler complain where it does ( the line marked with
asterisks) in someMethod, but does not reject the declaration statement
in someMethod2? I would have assumed both are the same and the
compiler has the same type information at its disposal to determine
the correct type.
Cheers,
BonnyThe Java 5 compiler not only looks at a method's name and arguments, but also at its return value in order to determine whether a method is callable and what type should be infered for its type parameters.
In your example the type parameter T is only used in the declaration of the method's return type. Note that there is no relation between T and the type of the argument cls!
Thus, the compiles needs to know what type of variable the return value will be assigned to.
Hence, someMethod2 can be resolved, whereas in someMethod there is no assignment of the return value. (Rather, an implicit call to Iterable.iterator()).
You can solve this problem by forming a relation between the method's argument, its return type and its type parameter. Just declare the method like this:
public <T extends Base> Collection<T> getCollection(Class<T> cls)
return null;
} -
Error while assigning objects to Transport Request
Hi All,
while assigning a Transfromation to a Treq i am getting an error saying
Object '7KU37C7IG3T7AQ5NHSLEZVC91' (ROUT) of type 'Routine' is not available in version 'A'
Message no. RSO252
Diagnosis
You wanted to generate an object with the name '7KU37C7IG3T7AQ5NHSLEZVC91' (in transport request ROUT) of type 'Routine' (TLOGO). This is, however, not available in the BW Repository database. It does not exist in the requested version A. If the version is 'D' then it is possible that an error arose during the delivery or installation. If the version is 'A' then the Object was either not created or not activated.
System Response
The object was not taken into account in the next stage of processing.
Kindly advice how to rectify this errorHi,
You see the which infoobejct contains that routine and first collect that infoobejct and transport it then transport Transfromation. I hope you are missing some Routines while collecting the Transformations into request.
See OSS Notes:
Note 613581 - Transfer structure does not exist in version 'D'
Note 508921 - P11:Content transfer:RSO 252 or RSO 296:InfoObject
Note 1157873 - BI7.0(SP18) Message RSO 252 using transport connection
Thanks
Reddy -
Assign Object dependencies for hierarchial tasklist
Hi All,
I want to programmatically update the hierarchial tasklist with object dependency assignment. BDC is not supporting for WPSTLH1.
Is there any function module or BAPI available?To Jagdish ,
Can you elaborate exactly where you want use object dependency in routing .Inprocess or in spection plasn .
Regards
SANIL -
Help needed in SD VC Assigning Object Dep. for all values at the 1 time
Dear, Gurus
I am successful in achieving pricing in VC the long way example: If Characteristic is Car_Color and values Blue, Red. I assign
$self.Z_CarPrice=u2019Redu2019 and it works. Z_CarPrice is basically the variant condition linkage with tables SDCOM and VKOND.
My question is how can I achieve the above by assigning it to the header so that it automatically enters the code $self into all values without me having to go into it 1 by 1 and assigning the codes? Or what is the best way in achieving the results?
If I have 3 characteristics ex: Car_Model, Car_Color, Car_Size? 100's of values? 4th characteristic is Z_CarPrice inside this I have entered all the Values from the 3 characteristics.
Thanks in AdvanceHi,
Try these steps and hope will definitely resolve your issue
Create one variant table VT_BASE_PRICE with combinations of the char Z_COLOR,Z_MODEL and Z_SIZE as key fields
Table Structure
Z_Color
Z_Model
Z_Size
Z_Car_Price
Table Contents
Z_Color Z_Model Z_Size Z_Car_Price
RED Honda Big BP_RED_HONDA_BIG
RED Honda Small BP_RED_HONDA_SML
Maintain the table values with all possible combinations and for each combination enter a unique key under Z_car_Price column. Remember the variant key length Max is 26 and you can use any unique value which should give a meaning by looking at
Once maintained the table write a dependency
Table VT_BASE_PRICE
(Z_COLOR = Z_COLOR,
Z_MODEL = Z_MODEL,
Z_SIZE = Z_SIZE,
Z_CAR_PRICE = $self.Z_CAR_PRICE)
Thus for each combination no need to write the code to infer the variant key. It will automatically choose from table as per configuration values entered.For each variant key you need to maintain price in condition records for condition type.
Regards,
Brahmaji D -
Error in Migo: Account determination for entry NCSA KDM not possible
We did not setup the account for KDM as we fixed the exchange rate at PO. Did not expect such error when perform GR for foreign currency PO. This happened in our production environment.
In the developement environment, did not encountered such problem.
Would appreciate if anyone had encounter the same issue enlighten us where went wrong.
Regards,
Peck HarHi,
Yes, the data entry (PO) is correct. And compare the valuation setting in IMG of developement environment seem alright. Not sure what's else to check.
Regards,
Peck Har -
Error during material determination for sales document item - RRB
Hi
Iam getting following error when trying to create a billing request using DP91.
Error during material determination for sales document item 40001560/000010
Message no. AD01155
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
I have checked my DIP profile using ODP02 there are no errors in it, I have created a Setid and assigned it to costing element in selection criteria and material determination criteria.
Material origin is checked in costing tab in material master.
Appreciate help in resolving this.
thanks,
VaishnaviHi Vaishnavi
The error which you are getting is related to costing.So kindly reach your FI Consultant
please check the following links which may help you.Also check the link that has been provided my Lakshmipathi
ERROR AT DP90 TRANSACTION
Regards
Srinath -
In DP50 Error during material determination for service order
Hi,
While doing Resources-Related Billing request,the following error is displaying..
Kindly Help
Error during material determination for service order
Message no. AD01156
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
501384
Message no. AD01156
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
Thanks,
MohitHi mohit,
You need to check DIP profile setting if profile is attached to your order type or not please check this
Thanks and regards
Sachin Kadam -
Error:Account determination for entry 1000 KBS 0001 not possible
Hi all,
i created one project PO account assignment category Q ,with out master data ,material text , material group , i entered W.B.S ,
P.O . created ,while doing GR , i am getting following error Account determination for entry 1000 KBS 0001 not possible
regards
vijjuDear Viju,
The error M8 147(Account determination for entry XXX KBS
not possible)is because of the corresponding entry mismatch in T030
table .For resolving this we need to make a corresponding entry in
transaction OBYC (the menu path in SPRO is as follows)
Materials Management
-> Valuation and Account Assignment
-> Account Determination
-> Account Determination Without Wizard
-> Configure Automatic Postings
Please also review
Note 364570 M8147,KBS posting when assigning accnt to GR for PO
Regards
V V -
CO assignment object for sales revenue account
while doing the intercompany billing after PGI, system is throwing an error 'account assignment object is required for sales revenue account xxxxxx'. However, the sales revenue account is created as a revenue element and the profit centre accounting is active. How can I solve this issue ?
RegardsHi,
The account assignments flow from the sales order into the billing document. If you update the profit center in the sales order in the profi center field of the item detail view - > account assignment tab, it will be captured in the billing document.
Also if you want this to happen automatically, this can be maintained in the material master. Or you may need to define a substitution using 0KEM.
Cheers. -
Business area not determined for line item?
Hello All,
I am trying to create a sales order. When I enter a line item and enter plant for the item, it gives me an error "Business area not determined for the line item #" and it does not accept the item.
I have already checked in the enterprise structure in IMG that the business area is defined and assigned for this plant.
Is there anything else need to be done? Do we have to define or assign the business area in material master?
I would appreciate if somebody can answer.
Thanks.There are three rules for determining a business area:
o Rule 1: plant and division
o Rule 2: for each sales area
o Rule 3: for each plant and item division
See what you are missing
Maybe you are looking for
-
I Upgraded my iPad mini with retina screen 16 GB to iOS 8. I'm facing weird issues..i can't open iTunes , itunes store and can't upgrade app which I have downloaded..furthermore my iPad became slow..I don't understand what to do...please help me
-
Sim free Z10 purchase from UK to be used in Pakistan
Hello I am from Pakistan and am currently in UK. I want to buy a Z10 from here which i will use back home. Some questions please. 1. Can i use the sim free phone with my mobile operator in pakistan, without a hassle. Last thing i want is I buy the ph
-
Now both of my websites do not appear iniWeb. In following suggestions to find my domain files, when I go to users and click on my folder, there are negative signs on several of the folders, including libray. The message says I don't have access. How
-
How do I change my I cloud ID to match my Apple ID?
-
Another string pool clarification
public static void main(String[] args) { char[] diff = new char[]{'D','i','f','f','e','r'}; String s = new String(diff); String t = new String(diff); System.out.println(System.identityHashCode(s));