FMS 2 License Stack issue

Due to increased traffic on our FMS we need to stack another
license. We have 2 licenses on 2 servers. We would like to take the
license from server 2 which is not in use and stack with the
license already on server 1.
When I try and add the serial via the console it invalidates
both licenses and switches to developer edition. I have checked the
admin log and this shows the following error - "Volume licenses can
not be mixed with any other kind. Switching to developer edition."
If I remove either serial key the remaining key becomes valid again
and so switches back to 150 connections mode.
Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks Graham. After finally getting through to there
technical support I was able to speak to someone who looked into
the license keys and found that the first one we purchased was a
volume licence. They then issued us with a new License key which
enabled us to stack with no problems.
Now running some tests on FMS3 will deffinatly look to use
this soon.

Similar Messages

  • Having trouble installing ProIX on new Windows 8 machine after XP crash.  Get almost ll of the way through and get an error box ... contact system support.  Only way out is to abort and then it un-installs.  Wondering if a licensing max issue since we did

    having trouble installing ProIX on new Windows 8 machine after XP crash.  Get almost ll of the way through and get an error box ... contact system support.  Only way out is to abort and then it un-installs.  Wondering if a licensing max issue since we didn't get an opportunity to uninstall off of crashed machine?

    Hey robr72339266,
    With a single user license, you can install Acrobat on maximum two computers, say, your laptop at work and desktop at office.
    But, you cannot use Acrobat on both the machines simultaneously.
    You will first need to deactivate Acrobat from the old machine, then install and activate the software on the new OS with the same serial key.
    Please Contact | Adobe to seek help on the same.
    Regards,
    Anubha

  • 3750x stack issue adding additional unit

    I have a 3750X stack with 2 48 port members that have been up and running for over a year without issue.
    I'm trying to add a new 24 port 3750X. I've made sure the priority is correct, and I've added a provision for the new member in the stack.
    they are all running the exact same version of IOS.
    I think the problem is, the version of the stack.  the existing stack states it is version 1.45, while the new member states it is version 6.45
    According to what I've read, the way to upgrade the stack version is to upgrade the IOS, but the IOS is already at the version of the new member.
    I've not tried to reboot the existing stack because it's in high usage production.
    here's the data I think is relevant. if anyone has a clue or needs more info, let me know.
    Here's the existing stack:
    The System image file is "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE5/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE5.bin"
    BOOTLDR: C3750E Boot Loader (C3750X-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(53r)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
                     Stack State Machine View
    ==============================================================
    Switch   Master/   Mac Address          Version    Current
    Number   Member                          (maj.min)  State
    1        Master    7cad.74eb.3300          1.45        Ready
    2        Member    bc16.656a.5a80          1.45        Ready
    Here's the new Member:
    System image file is "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE5/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE5.bin"
    BOOTLDR: C3750E Boot Loader (C3750X-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(58r)SE1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
                     Stack State Machine View
    ==============================================================
    Switch   Master/   Mac Address          Version    Current
    Number   Member                          (maj.min)  State
    3        Master    e4c7.22a1.f400          6.45        Ready

    I actually need the IP Base because this stack does routing.
    I think I need a license upgrade on the new switch.
    I'm looking into it now.

  • Concurrent crystal license timeout Issue, need help.

    Hi,
    My company is using crystal enterprise 10 with 18 concurrent user license.
    However, we often hit out of crystal license issues.
    Does time to wait for exporting crystal reports to excel/pdf takes up licenses?
    Does time to wait for crystal report to be printed or viewed on the web browser takes up licenses?
    We all know that user sessions take up user licenses. 1 user login take up 1 license.
    Does crystal pruning job takes up user licenses too?
    Need help urgently, much appreciated.

    Hi Daren,
    Support on Cystal Enterprise 10 has expired. Make sure that your users are actually logging off and not just closing their browser.
    One user can take up multiple licenses by not logging off or opening multiple browsers to view multiple reports. Scheduled jobs that are running do not take up license, but a user veiwing a historical instance does take up a license.
    In your metrics tab in the Cyrsatl Management Console -> Servers-> cms you should be able to see the active number of sessions- system connections are backend connections between the servers and these do not take up any licenses.
    Best Regards,
    Jadie

  • ISE 1.2/1.2.1 license consumption issues

    Hi all, I know this topic is somewhat done to death but I want to know whether anyone else is experiencing this issue. In summary my ISE deployment (right this minute) has 17 Active sessions with 17 base and 17 plus licenses consumed. My issue with this is that of the 17 active sessions only 8 of these sessions are utilising a plus feature ie the registration status in the authorisation policy. In short at all times the plus license consumption always matches the base license consumption.
    I have continually had this issue with all ISE deployments whereby the license consumption does not reflect Cisco documentation and my configurations. Without giving screenshots I can say with certainty that the only plus feature been used is the BYOD onboarding and subsequent registration status in the authz policy. The rest of my policies are straight forward CWA guest and EAP-TLS machine cert authorisations with no profiling information used in the policy. I have gone so far as to turn off profiling and removing BYOD policies with the same results.
    The following document clearly states what should and shouldn't consume a license:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/identity-services-engine/datasheet-c78-730772.pdf
    Any input would be appreciated.

    The bug is listed as fixed, but I don't see which software it is fixed in. I must admit I've seen this problem for months, probably over a year now. It was already the case on 1.1.4 at least. I have some customers using 1300 of 500 advanced licenses.
    It would be nice if it functioned exactly as the documentation always said. It would give you a warm feeling that things will keep working when the advanced license expires entirely (I'm sure we'll find out soon).
    At one point I was told it was under discussion whether to fix the problem, or to fix the documentation to fit the problem, but last I heard it would be fixed at some point in the future. Every time we get a call regarding new software (1.2.1, 1.3) I make sure I ask them that the trust based licensing continues. We're OK as long as trust based licensing continues, but it's scruffy and hard to explain to customers why it shows 3 times as many advanced users as they already have. And then on occasions you see their eyes light up when they realise they can run 3000 advanced and Cisco will be none the wiser, or alternatively that they could have got away with a 100 user license and you've just cost them a 5000 user license that nobody can tell if they are using or not.

  • Adobe Pro 9.0 Licensing / Upgrade issues

    We have 15 users with 9.0, most of whom periodically experience the well known Error "Licensing has stopped working". The licensing repair tool does not fix for long nor does any  of the other lengthy resolutions detailed in the licensing stopped working KB on adobe.com
    My question -
    1. How do I upgrade users from 9.0 to 9.5 if 9.0 no longer has any updates available? Will the 9.0 license cover this and how can I get media / install file as I can only find update files to an existing 9.5 file (we have tested a problematic user on a new version of Adobe and this is shown to resolve the issue)

    Hi Stefan,
    You can download the updates for Acrobat 9 from: Update, patch | Acrobat, Reader 7.x - 9.x | Windows
    or : ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/acrobat/win/9.x/
    For licensing error please try the following:
    Delete the Adobe PCD folder and caps.db file:
    Windows:  \Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Adobe PCD
                        \Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\caps\caps.db
    Launch Acrobat, enter the serial number and check.
    Regards,
    Rave

  • Acrobat 9 Pro license key issue.

    Why won't my Acrobat 9 Pro license key work on the install onto my new computer?

    I have two days left on my "Trial version". From what I've read in the forums, reinstalling from a link has fixed this issue with other users. Can you send me one? (This is driving me crazier than normal)
    Kerry
    Frustrated and running out of patience  . . . . .

  • Flex 2 charting license watermark issue

    We've purchased the flex 2 builder and flex charting. I've
    installed the serials and all works fine when the application is
    build using flex builder. The watermark is removed. When I build
    the application using command line (which points to same SDK as in
    flex builder), the watermark remains? Does anyone know how to
    resolve this issue or if this is a bug?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    I had the same problem and I am also using Maven instead of
    Ant to build.
    I managed to workout that you can add the mxmlc command line
    argument, "-licenses.license charting XXXXXXXXXXX", to the
    "flex-config.xml" using the following (Note: add it outside of the
    <compiler> tag):
    <licenses>
    <license>
    <product>charting</product>
    <serial-number>XXXXXXXXXX</serial-number>
    </license>
    </licenses>
    By doing this I could continue to build my Flex code through
    maven.

  • Wlc-2504-k9 ap license upload issue

    Hi i have 20 access points and wlc controller with 15 ap supported .I got 5 ap license but am not able to upload .
    Temproray i have enabled evaluation license which is valid 12 weeks . but when i tried to upload the liecense its giving me error .
    Can anybody help me the exact steps .

    Hi Breeze,
    I think its normal behaviour for Cisco WLCs.
    Example: It happend with me.
    Old licence was for 15APs
    if you add 5 more ap licence to WLC then old Licence will go in inactive state but evaluation License will be in use.
    After evaluation period you will get the total 20 AP licence in in use status.
    This happend with me.
    I think this guy I also have similer issue: https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2205144
    If you still have doubts or issues then please go for TAC case.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards

  • CAF License Key issue solved

    Hi,
    Some questions in this forum relate to the CAF license key. (This key is needed if you'd like to work with the CAS perspective in the NetWeaver Developer Studio.)
    This issue is now solved: use the newest SneakPreview NetWeaver NW04s, SP7, then no license key is needed for designing CAF projects.
    Here the corresponding <a href="/people/jan.rauscher/blog/2006/05/11/caf-license-key">CAF license key web log</a>
    Regards,
      Jan

    Hi Suresh,
    Do you have an addon with a special character in the name?
    Regards
    Ad

  • B2B Document Editor License Key Issue

    Hi,
    I have downloaded Oracle B2B Document Editor from OTN and installed the same without any error but while trying to use it to generate B2B guideline files (ecs and xsd files), at the very first step we are getting the error saying -
    *"This feature is not available with the current type of license. Please contact [email protected] to obtain an upgraded license key."*
    As a result, it is not allowing further to create the guideline files i.e. we cannot use the software.
    Have anybody faced this issue? Any idea about is it expected or why this is coming or how to get rid of this?
    Note: Buying a license is not an option for me as I just want to evaluate the software.
    Download link I have used: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/downloads/fmw-11-download-092893.html
    Thanks
    Satyaki

    Satyaki,
    But as I understand installing b2b doc editor does not have any dependency with SOA installation as such and it can be installed at any Standard Windows machine with no SOA in it. So, has this concept changed in case of this latest version? Should the latest doc editor version can be installed only where soa is installed? Your understanding is correct. B2B Doc Editor is independent of SOA and that patch should be applied into SOA environment(SOA Suite 11g R1 (11.1.1.5.0)) release to use complete health care features in SOA which are already available in Doc Editor 11.1.1.5.0
    Moreover, will the guideline files generated using this doc editor NOT work if used with soa suite version 11.1.1.3? You are not supposed to use B2B Doc Editor 11.1.1.5.0 version with SOA Suite 11.1.1.3.0
    I will personally suggest you to use SOA 11.1.1.4.0 and B2B Doc editor 11.1.1.4.0 if you are working on any evaluation.
    Regards,
    Anuj

  • Wcs license upgrade issue

    Dear all,
    We have two 4400 controllers which support 50 Access points each and wcs with 100 base license.Now we added 5508 controller supports 50 access points.wcs is upgraded with another 50 ap license.The 5508 controller is joined to wcs and the licence showing permanent.WCS showing all aps and showing both 100 and 50 licence as permanent.
    But the issue is while loging into the wcs it showing the error message as"The system is in violation of license.The number of APs registered is greater then licensed."
    What might be the reason.Please help me.
    Attaching the screen shot.
    Thanks in Advance
    Bose.

    Because your WCS is still licensed for 100 APs ....
    There are 2 license level : Base and PLUS.
    You had a 100 AP Base license.
    You bought a PLUS_UPG license which upgrade 50 out of your 100 AP count to PLUS.
    Result : you now have 100 AP licensed on WCS, out of which 50 have the "PLUS" feature set.
    You should have ordered a "BASE ap count 50" license. or if you want to go to plus, a "plus_UPG" license but for the 100, and then a plus ap count 50.

  • Font Licensing Restriction Issue

    I recently transferred a lot of ttf and otf fonts (originally purchased for and used on a Windows NT machine) to Mac Book Pro. When I try to use the fonts in Abode CS5.5 (In illustrator) I'm told I need a license. Won't let me embed the fonts, for example, when saving to a PDF. (1) Is this a Mac issue or an Adobe issue? (2) How do I resolve?
    The Illustrator message reads: "The font [name] could not be embedded in the PDF document because of licensing restrictions. Stroked text will not be visible."

    It may be the Mac is more up-to-date with font restriction enforcement, dunno, you may have to Google it. I've run into this for years, generally with free fonts, so before I am ready to produce the final PDF I just outline the font which works fine for print pieces of all sizes but not for online documents with many pages due to file size as the outline shapes are certainly larger in file size than font references based on shapes in fonts that can be embedded.
    You may want to consider asking the font developer first before purchasing again as just repurchasing may not get rid of a "non-embed" setting in a file if that is what the font developer wants there.
    So your options are: use your old Windows workflow, outline fonts, or contact the font developer. Nothing else anyone on discussion boards can do for you.

  • Licensing/Downloading issues with CS5.5?

    Anyone else purchase CS5.5 recently to get the free upgrade to CS6 and run into a bunch of issues?  I purchased Production Premium yesterday (5/3/12), and aside from an initial confirmation email, I've gotten zip since.  None of the programs were showing up on the licensing site (which is now down for "scheduled" maintenance) meaning no chance to download what I bought or get serial numbers, no email with my order number, no history of my order or transaction in my account info, online chat support stating that it's a 72-hour wait to get your downloads/serial numbers instead of the "up to 24 hour" time frame specified by the email, getting transfered from one department to another only to have the call dropped, a 2-hour hold for the licensing support line and no reps available for chat...
    And of course the weekend is upon us so I'll likely have to wait until next week to (hopefully) access the software I purchased.  Kind of ridiculous.  Buy an online product somewhere else and you get download access as soon as you make the payment.  Spend $2000 on Adobe products and get no the runaround about what's going on with the order, why the delay, shoddy support/web services, etc.
    Ugh.  Am I the only one?  Has annyone else made a purchase in the last couple of days without a hitch, namely a Creative Suite product in anticipation of the free upgrade to CS6 when it's released?
    Do other users find this type of experience typical for Adobe purchases/support, or is it usually a hassle-free and straightforward process?  The software itself is going to be fantastic, no doubt, but the ordering process and customer support thus far has been absolutely dreadful. 

    Things are always busy and response times prolonged around the time of a major new release at Adobe.  As you saw, CS6 was released then so there was quite a bit of preparation and cutover going on and increased traffic...  But you should almost always be able to access the free trial downloads to get started with your product right away (no interruption and they're good for 30 days), until the permanent serial numbers arrive.

  • Quality Management 2.7.3 - Licensing Users - Issue

    I have a setup of QM 2.7.3 with IPCCX 7.0.
    The moment I login to QM administrator, I get error:
    Licensed user list is empty, until this is resolved, desktop users will be unable to log in, and recording will not function
    Please (re)license users via the License Users Dialog in User Administion.
    But to fix this issues, when I select one one user and Try to license by clicking the "License Users" , I see another window by the name of
    License/ Unlicense USers, which is totally empty and the "Advanced" and "Unlicensed" buttons are greyed out(see screenshot attached)
    But actually I have 40 QM Advanced users licenses, which are successfully imported from IPCCX and which I can see under "Enterprise Settings".
    This way, my agents can't login in the QM desktop, unless they are licensed.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Yes, entering the Windows logon ID is absolutely vital - it's what links the logged-in user to an 'agent' in QM and therefore UCCX. Who actually logs into CAD doesn't matter, QM doesn't really care about that. If you (for example) log all users in as 'administrator', all their recordings would appear as if they were done by whichever user in QM you have configured with the windows logon of 'administrator'.
    In order to record all calls, you would configure a workflow in the QM Administrator program - see the manual for details of how to map UCCX Teams to AQM Groups, and then the groups to a workflow.
    Regards
    Aaron

Maybe you are looking for