Forecast Cost - WBS Components

I've read the link: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/df/56121cc3c411d1ad990000e8a6353a/content.htm
I would like to ask if you experts could confirm me that there is no way of including the Forecast cost of the project components with procurement type "Reservation for WBS Element" as WBS element plan values are not considered.
Is this correct?
The same issue happens with RemOrdPlan value? WBS element plan values are neither considered?
Thanks

Let me better explain.
Non-stock material component worth $100. PR created.
- Execute transaction CJ9L
- Commitments column shows $100.
- Updated Remaining Cost shows $0.
In this case, should the commitments and the updated remaining costs be equal?
Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Cost of components display in CS11 /Cs12 / CS13 T.codes

    Hi,
      I want to display cost of the components in CS11 / CS12 / CS13 T.codes Std SAP will not display the cost of components. for this they have given note 177006 and asked to change some manual correction. In the post processing of the note they have asked put "your_display_profl" This is making me confusing I wanted know whether I want to create a new display pofile using CLVL t.code or can I make the correction as said by SAP "your_display_profl". Could some body guide me in this regard.
    Regards
    Ramana

    HI
    Check these reports for BOM Components and costs
    CK79_99 Material: Itemization Comparison
    K80_99 Material: Cost Components
    CK84 Line Items in Cost Est for Product
    CK84_99 Material: Itemization
    CK86 Costed Multilevel BOM
    CK86_99 Material: Multilevel BOM.
    Also you can use this FM for developing reports,CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2 provided X is included for the input parameter
    Regards
    Anupam Sharma

  • Forecast on Material Components

    Hello.
    I am executing a forecast on a simple project to try and understand the functionality of the forecast. There is 1 WBS with an Internal Activity with a Material Component assigned. There is no work (ie. work center and hours) on the internal activity. The Material Component has a PReq generated and is in released status. I show commitments on the project of $100 corresponding to the PReq line item for the material cost of $100. There are no actuals and no PO has been created. However, when I execute the CJ9L forecast, the Updated Remaining costs show 0. It is my understanding that the commitments of the material component should factor into the forecast. Am I missing something? Should this not show $100 in the Remaining Costs? Ultimately, we have no spent the $100 yet, so there should be $100 forecast to spend, right?
    Thanks.

    Let me better explain.
    Non-stock material component worth $100. PR created.
    - Execute transaction CJ9L
    - Commitments column shows $100.
    - Updated Remaining Cost shows $0.
    In this case, should the commitments and the updated remaining costs be equal?
    Thanks.

  • Project Cost - WBS Element

    Experts,
    If we collect costs at the Project level (i.e by entering Project Number and not by the WBS Element) on the PO, is there anyway we can kind of split that costs to the WBS Elements - Please note that we are doing a settlement on the costs collected by the project to an AuC during period end.
    All answers/inputs/thoughts would be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
    Thanks,
    Nandita

    as Venkat said, you CANNOT post cost directly to project definition..
    as per my understanding you have a PO and you want to allocate it to different WBS elements?
    example PO XXXXXX with amount 500; you want say 350 to go to WBSX and 150 to go to WBSY? is that your requirement?
    if yes, you could do manual reposting (500 will go to WBSX then you repost 150 to WBSY)
    or perhaps in your settlement you define more than 1 settlemtn rule and you can allocate it by percentage, amount or equivalence number to several WBS.
    best regards.

  • Costs of components and activities not incorporated in costs of FG

    Dear experts,
    I am setting up discrete manufacturing in a warehouse with Handling units. The process I follow:
    1. Crate handling unit with COWBPACK
    2. Do goods receipt with COWBHUWE
    3. Consume components with COWBHUWA
    When looking at the financial documents behind the goods receipt of the finished product, I notice that the only costs that are booked are the costs of the actual finished product to inventory, but not the activities or the costs of the components...
    What am I doing wrong or what configuration is missing?
    Thanks. M

    Hi Pankaj,
    When generating PPM/
    PDS, the system checks whether the components of the bill of material exist in an active integration model. If not, the corresponding components are not transferred to the PPM.
    Compenet will not transfer if :
    -Components that have the phantom item indicator are not transferred.
    -Components that have the bulk issue indicator are not transferred.
    -If the leading material already exists in APO but this leading material is no longer in an active integration model, no  data is sent to APO.
    If all are fine, will suggest you to to do initial tranfer again.
    Manish

  • Planned Cost WBS Element = which extractor

    Der all,
    i try to extract the planned cost for an WBS element.
    The extractor 0CO_OM_WBS_2 delivers no data and 0CO_OM_WBS_3 only a few.
    Am I using the correct extractors.
    I want to extract the same figures you can see in R/3 with transaction CJ41.
    Thanks for help !
    Marc

    Hi,
    Please try the 0CO_OM_WBS_1 extractor for WBS Element Costs (Plan). Data can be extracted using Currency Type = 00 (transaction Currency), 10 (CC Currency) and 20 (Controlling area currency).
    Refer to the below link for fields of origin in the extract Structure.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/EN/dc/f8ab39bae14c67e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Thanks.

  • Costing for components

    Dear all,
    With respect to the above subject, we are trying to calculate the costing
    for the semifinsihed material using a T-code CK11N.
    But, Most of the operations carried out by the job workers are on our
    machinery. So, whenever we are creating a routing for operation in our
    factory we are mentioning the work center and the control key as PP02. But,
    when we are trying to capture operation cost for the PP02 it is taking
    only the cost which is mentioned in the purchase info records or which is
    mentioned in routing.
    So, please specify what necessary change in the fields are required so that we can capture the
    exact cost of the components.
    Best regards,
    Shailesh

    How about creating Activity Types for each machine and assiging these activities to the material BOM? The cost centre(s) assigned to the corresponding work centres will help calculate the unit cost for the sake of product costing.
    Cheers.

  • Project Management -Automatic process to approve Forecast Cost and Revenue?

    Hello,
    If anyone can help me with this it would be greatly appreciated.
    Due to our business requirements, we have to run the "PRC: Generate Financial Plan Amounts" program every week for 40-50 projects.
    The issue with this is that after running this program we have to manually go into each project and approve the latest cost and revenue versions. Is there a program or an api that I can use to automatically approve these projects without going into each project and manually update them?
    Thank you in advanced.

    Hello,
    I found a way to approve the budget costs and revenues using the PA Budget workflow. In order to kick off this workflow I still have to submit the budget costs or revenue. Is there anyway I can by pass this submission process? Is there an api I can use to submit the latest budget costs so it will kick off the workflow?
    Thanks
    -Nelly

  • Product costing with components purchased in countries with high inflation

    Hi guru,
    I have the following problem. My company produced in Italy but buy some component from India, that is a country with high inflation.
    When I run the product costing for a finished product in Italy, in which way I can consider the high inflation in India? My doubt is that I can have a wrong product costing because the value of component is not correct
    Thanks
    Regards
    Raffaele

    Hi
    Product costing allows recursive BOM with certain restrictions. Kindly check the following link for more information on recursiveness:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/bc/566916eff011d189be0000e8214595/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Suraj

  • Exclusion of components from costing in production.

    Hi Gurus,
    The requirement is not to cost some components in the BOM during production.
    One option is to use the Not to cost indicator in the Costing view of the material master but still the component is costed as the planned and the actual costs are calculated and viewed in the Cost Analysis in the Production Order.
    Next option is to use the component as a Bulk material but it needs more attention Can any one tell me the consequences of the usage of a bulk materail thereby not costing the material.
    Thanks
    Anand.

    go to cs02
    select the component  go to Item
    In status/lng text tab
    In costing relevancy maintain " " blank ( not relevant for costing ) instead of "X" - 100% Relevant to Costing.
    during costing run, system won't consider this component

  • How do I delete Statistical Forecasts for components that have no history

    Hi
    How do I delete Statistical Forecasts for components that have no historical data, but the Stat forecast model is still forecasting values for components.
    Other than creating a macro to clear the key figure columns interactively in the planning book, where in the model or background job do I activate or set that components without 12 months historical data are not forecasted .i.e. zero values in forecast for these components?
    Thanx
    Keegan

    Hi Keegan,
    To my knowledge there is no standard way you can tell the system not to forecast if the last 12 periods are zeros.
    We have the same issue and we use 3 methods to get around this:
    1. A macro as you said
    2. Create a phase out profile in life cycle profile with parameters, start date today to some 12/31/9999 and set the "Before start date, apply constant factor" 100% and "After start date, apply constant factor" 0%
    and check the indicator " Life cycle planning " in master forecast profile.
    This puts zeros for all future values but does not check if the history has zeros in it.
    3. Delete unwanted CVCs so that we will not see any issues with disaggregation and junk data.

  • Burden Cost by Burden Cost Components

    Implementation completed accounting for total Burdened Cost,now need to implement based on burden cost components.
    How to go about it? Can anyone help me Please?
    Thanks a lot in advance

    Hi
    There are several methods of handling burdening. You might want to review the Projects Costing user guide. Chapter 3 is dedicated to discussion on various alternative setups of Burden.
    If you need to leave burdened costs on the same expenditure item, using the total burden costs, you could setup to account for the burden components on separate expenditure types charged to a shared indirect project. That indirect project will control the AA of the burden costs by components.
    Dina

  • Costing Run Error

    Hi All,
    I am currently trying to roll cost for materials but have an error that i can not seem to resolve, i hope someone can assist me and help me understand.
    While rolling the cost for a specific material the MFG Overhead cost is not being calculated correctly, i have looked at the routings for this material and do see where the error might stem from, but i do not think it can be corrected from there.
    The error is that in the routing the cost for MFG Overhead is calculated by adding Labour (1H) and Setup (0.017) and MFG Overhead = 1.017.  The lot size of this material is 300 but when roll up the cost with CK11N per unit the Set up value is 0.003 but the MFG Overhead does not calculate in the same fashion it remains as 1.017 (it should be 1.017/300 = 0.0033 ) This is causing a massive discrepancy in costing.  Now one solution is that the amount can be corrected externally and then update the routing and run the costing, but there will be an issue if the lot size is increased in the future (instead of 300 the lot size is increased to 400, now the routing will have to be change to 1.017/400 = 0.0025).  How can i correct the logic within SAP?  I have tried configuring the costing sheet, but i am not not sure where to change it.  In my costing run i am using costing variant PPC1.
    I have tried being as detailed as possible, and i hope it is coherent.
    I would really appreciate you help and points will be awarded.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Althea,
    Thank you for your response.
    In the routing we have removed the MFG Overhead and now are using the Costing Sheet to calculate the Overhead.  I think i have updated everything, eg costing sheet, costing sheet components, percentage overhead rates, costing variants.  But now the requirement has changed again!!!! Just when you think you have crawled your way out of a ditch, someone pulls you back in. 
    In the legacy system they were able to calculate overhead in relation to cost centers ( Setup, Labor and Overhead for 403, Setup, Labor and Overhead for 403B and for 407 etc), but in the costing sheet you can only enter one cost center, is it possible to enter multiple cost centers and where would i do that?
    Now i had a cost element for Overhead, but in the cost element category was incorrectly selected as 43 (Internal activity allocation) instead of 41 (Overhead rates) now when i am trying to use select that Cost Element in the Costing Sheet under the credit area it will not allow me to save it.  I have created a new cost element but i am not certain what the impact might be
    Please help!!!
    Thanks in advance

  • Query to show component cost of production order

    Need help writing a query to show the component cost of a production order, using moving average valuation method.
    I understand the table oinm has all history for an item and its calculated price.
    would like to query a production order to show the cost of components at the time of receipt of that production order.
    ideas?

    I have created this query that will work:
    SELECT t0.docdate,t0.appobjtype as [Prod/Comp],t0.itemcode,t0.dscription,t0.outqty,t0.calcprice,(t0.outqty*t0.calcprice) as [Trans Value],t0.warehouse,t0.appobjabs as [Production Order] FROM OINM T0  WHERE t0.transtype='59' and T0.[AppObjAbs] =[%0] order by t0.transnum
    The prompt is where you enter the production order document number.  It will show the calculated cost of components at the time of receipt.
    Thanks for the guidance.
    Rich

  • How to track costing in Production order

    Hello Everyone
    I would like to get some details about how to set the product costs for Finished Goods and also how to track the expenses like packaging, labor, electricity, other charges etc, for individual production order.
    I have created the labor and packaging as a non inventory item and have used it in the BOM, now after the production order is closed, i find these two costs to be in the Actual Additional costs as shown below, till this is great.   
    But the requirement was, when they want to view the expenses or a month, then they require individual split up of costs against each production order. Is this even feasible?
    Please require help from you guys.
    Appreciate your help in this regard.
    Thank You

    Product Costing
    The cost of a FIFO or moving-average product is the sum of its component costs and additional costs (such as labor and overhead). To ensure accurate calculations of product cost, even if the components were issued manually, SAP Business One uses the cost of the items issued to production order and not the cost of the items currently in inventory. This avoids differences between the actual cost of components used in the order and the value of the product.
    Note
    The cost calculation method described here is relevant only for standard and special production orders, but not for disassembly for companies managing perpetual inventory.
    In the case of disassembly the components enter the inventory with the same cost as the items currently there. If the component is managed by FIFO, the cost of the oldest layer is used.
    The cost of returned components does not change; it is the cost of the last one that was issued.
    The product cost calculation is determined by the item management method.
    Standard – When the product is managed by standard cost, no calculation is made, and the cost is copied from the item master data upon report completion.
    Moving Average – When the product is managed by moving average, two figures are required for product receipt into inventory: receipt quantity and total value added to the inventory. The total value is the product cost, which is the sum of all component costs used for those products.
    FIFO – When the product is managed by FIFO, each report completion opens a new cost layer for the product in the inventory. The quantity in the layer is the quantity of the products just reported as completed. The cost of the products is the sum of all component costs used for the completed products divided by the quantity of the products.
    On every report completion, the system checks the following three quantities for each manually issued component:
    Issued Quantity – The quantity already issued to the production order.
    Used Quantity – The quantity already used for the completed products (completed products multiplied by the base quantity of the component).
    Needed Quantity – The quantity needed for the products that were just reported as completed (quantity of products reported as completed multiplied by the base quantity of the component).
    If the Used Quantity is greater than or equal to the Issued Quantity, this means that all items issued for the production order have already been used, and the Needed Quantity is yet to be reported as issued from the warehouse. Since the cost of the items that were actually used for the products is unknown, SAP Business One takes the current prices from the inventory.
    If the Issued Quantity is greater than the Used Quantity, SAP Business One finds the cost of the components that were issued and not used, and uses them in the calculation of the product cost. When finding those components, the issuing order of the components is taken into account, meaning that the first components to be issued are the first to be used. The components following those that were used are the first to be used for the cost calculation.
    If the sum of Needed Quantity and Used Quantity is greater than the Issued Quantity, meaning that not all needed quantity was issued, SAP Business One needs to make an assumption for those items’ costs, so it takes the current prices from the inventory.
    Upon the completion of a production order, on the Production Order Window: Summary Tab, you can check the product cost figures of the production order.
    Regards
    Kennedy

Maybe you are looking for