Freight addition

Dear GURUS,
Is it possible to change the Freight Condition Amt or add new condition type in PO after the partial Goods Receipt.
Plz suggest.......
Thanks

Hi, If a vendor reports any additional freight charges after the GR say during IR, you can book it under unplanned delivery costs in MIRO. The cost can be posted directly to a seperate GL account or distributed amongst the items

Similar Messages

AR Down Payment and Freight/Additional Charges

We have several clients that would like the following functionallity:
When creating and AR Down Payment Invoice form a Sales Order, the Freight/Additional expenses should be populated.
The fields should be active so users can apply partial payments and the amounts reduce the open balance on the Sales Order appropriately, leaving the Sales Order open for adjustment (i.e. increased frieght charge)
This function should work as all other marketing documents do, allowing the mentioned fields to be drawn to the AR Down Payment.
Thanks,
Dean

I have a business case example.
My client, who only sells to distributors, so no sales tax is charged, has a web site that enables their customers to purchase products and pay for them using a credit card. Most products are priced to include freight, insurance, and handling charges. However, if the customer wants the product shipped over night, they can pay an additional freight charge. The Web site then forwards a sales order to the manufacturing site with the ordered item number and a flat rate shipping charge for over night delivery. The sales order is created in SAP B1 and since the order has been pre-paid, the special orders representative that manages these orders, creates a down payment invoice and enters a payment for the full amount of the order including the freight charge. When the actual invoice is created later, it is saved as a draft so that the special orders representative can drawn from the down payment invoice. But, since only the item price amount can be drawn, the freight charge has to be handled with an internal reconciliation.

Freight Charges on Subcontacted items

Hello All,
I would like to know if anyone has implemented freight charges on subcontracted items. We would like to add the freight charges on the costing of subcontracted items, I have seen some threads on this,
I am not sure what the solution is. I appreciate your time and help in advance, Please guide on the right path as to how we can implement this.
Thanks

Ajay and Shailendar,
thanks for your replies. Sorry for the delay in getting back on this issue. Our users want to see the freight charges on a separate cost component line in the CK11N. So I created a cost component for Freight. However, I do not know how to get the value into this Freight cost component line. When I tried to add the freight charges through CK74N, they are going into overhead as I was using overhead cost element in CK74N. Users do not want this as the overhead costs are inflated because of the freight addition to the overhead. Any ideas how to get the freight charges only into the cost component?
Thanks in advance.

Freight charges on return delivery

Hi,
How freight chargers are reversed while doing 161 mvt type.
Is there any separate mvt required to return freight charge.
How do we handle this plz clarify me....
BR
Vel
Note :Please search forum,subject is widely discussed in various threads in this forum
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Jun 7, 2011 8:20 AM

Ajay and Shailendar,
thanks for your replies. Sorry for the delay in getting back on this issue. Our users want to see the freight charges on a separate cost component line in the CK11N. So I created a cost component for Freight. However, I do not know how to get the value into this Freight cost component line. When I tried to add the freight charges through CK74N, they are going into overhead as I was using overhead cost element in CK74N. Users do not want this as the overhead costs are inflated because of the freight addition to the overhead. Any ideas how to get the freight charges only into the cost component?
Thanks in advance.

Freight Set up

Hello
I would like some information on setting up freight.
Is there any e-learning available, I have had a look under Administration , but could not find anything.
Thanks
D

Hi,
If you are talking aboutn freight/additional expenses as defined on the document, then there is a How-to guide, it is for version 2004 but there has been no big change since then.
[Additional Expenses in Release 2004 A|https://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_HIER_KEY=701100035871000371280&_OBJECT=011000358700001303772005E&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000183&]
Hope it helps,
Jesper

Additional Field require to flow from SAP Delivery Line to DTR Line to Freight Unit

Dear All,
My scenario is Delivery line Item = DTR Line Item = Freight Unit.
For this my requirement is I have added Additional field in ECC Delivery Line Item Table (LIPS) to record BAR Code Number.
Now I want this BAR Code Number to flow in DTR Line Item and also in Freight Unit probably in Z Field as I do not found any standard field which I can use to map Bar code Number.
Please suggest the necessary steps to achieve the same and also the Table/ Structures that need to be modified to flow additional field from Delivery (ECC) to PI and from PI to DTR (TM) and from DTR to Freight Unit.
Regards,
Vibhu Gupta

Hi,
First the inbound PI service needs to be enhanced with the addtional field on item level and in TRQ item node, this field also needs to be enahnced;
For this field, do you want to save it in FU header or item level?
In the implementation class of the inbound service, this field should be mapped to DTR item instance;
If you enhance the field in FU item level with same field name, then the field value saved in DTR item will automatically flow to FU item.
Hope this help.
BR, Dawson

Proceed with invoice addition automatically after updating freight form

Hi everybody,
Here is my problem
i am writing an add-on which intercepts the click of add button of the A/R Invoice form, so whenever this button is clicked the freight form is shown (where some values are added). But when the user confirms these values (presses update on the freight form) the addition of the invoice does not proceed, even though BubbleEvent is set to true.
Thanx in advance

Hi,
we had a hard fight with marc and got it solved.
[look here|Setting a Freight by the UI API ?;
regards
David

Free goods but want to freight cost updation upon GR

Hi,
Scenario:
I have a PO with 20 line items and header freight cost.
There are few more items in PO which are ticked as free goods.
There is a stock of those materials with certain MAP.
Freight condition has been configured as vendor GR so that it gets loaded on materials upon GR.
Requirement is that
Upon GR of this PO,MAPshould get updated with the freight cost for those materials also which have been marked as free goods.
How this can be achieved ?
Regards,
manOO

Hi Rang,
Thanks for the feedback.However service PO is out of scope as client do not want to go for servicees.
I could not understand your suggestion
<u>you give PO to frieght vendor for freight value & in remarks you mention reciving as FREE GOODS from vendor xxxxx & do GR load cost to material & pay to freight vendor. (this is not advisible, but one solution for your problem).</u>
I have to receive one material via purchase order as a free item but I need to pay vendor for the freight charges that will be incurred to ship this item along with all the other items in the same PO.
Can you please explain me further as what you mean to say in your post.
I should be able to load these freight cost on all the materials in PO including the material with 'free' indiactor.
In short upon GR MAP should affect with freight cost as there will not be value addition of the material since received as free.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
manOO

How to handle Packing, Frieght etc., additional charges on PO as separate lines - not looking for LCM

Hi,
Following is Business requirement given by client
1.Create Item ( say item code : PACKING CHARGES ) as Purchasable only ( non-stockable )
2.Invoice Match Option in Purchasing Tab of Item is : Receipt Required : No , Inspection Required : No
3.Receipt Close Tolerance is : 100% in Item setup > Purchasing Tab ( Client don't want this line to appear in Receipt Screen )
4.PO Created with two lines one is Inventory Item and second line is PACKING CHARGES
5.As soon as PO is approved Second line got closed for Receiving , First line is the only line visible in Receipt Screen
6.Receipt and Delivery is completed for Inventory item
7.Invoice is entered > Matched > Validated > generate accounting entries is also successfully completed
8.PO is still with Closure Status : Open at header level
9.Inventory Item Closed Status is Closed , PACKING CHARGES line is still with status Ope
Expectation is the PO Closure Status should go to Closed , since we have completed Invoice matching and account generation and there is nothing pending to be done.
Please help.
If you have any Test case document or document explaining similar case with accounting entries, this will be a great help.
Regards
Anil

Hi Anil,
I tried your test case here and below are my inferences.
a) At the time of PO Creation, the packaging item selected will be close for receiving.
b) The Item will be available for matching only if the Invoice Line type is Item, and the controls are defined as 3 Way Match Level with PO match option.
c) Before attempting to match this line, the match level at invoice must be changed to PO.
d) This line will not be created as a freight or packaging line, but it will be an item line type.
These inferences point to the fact that the mapping is not correct. By the book, freight or any other misc charges are finalized only when the item is received and not at PO creation.
Which means that the PO should have the only the item which is being procured and not the charges as separate line items.
At the time of creation of the Invoice, while matching you have an option to check the Freight/ Miscellaneous check box, which gives you a popup to enter the value of the Freight and associated cost type.
By adding this, system adds a new invoice line with the type freight/ misc and puts the additional amount incurred as charges there which is the correct behavior.
Please discuss with the customer and update us based on above facts.
Rgds,
Abhi

GRPO with Freight gives an error ...

Hello Experts,
When I post a GRPO without Freight it gives no error, but when I try to add with Freight Amount it gives an ERROR.
Inventory Account is not defined [Goods Receipt PO - Rows - Warehouse Code] Message 173-77.
Freight Setup: for that perticulat Freight that I am using... is Revenue and Expense Accounts are defined... Distribution and Drawing Methods are Quantity and Stock Check Box is CHECKED.
Help Required...
Thanks & Regards

Hello Nazir,
If your the items are set up with 'GL accounts managed by warehouse' (this is defined under the Inventory Tab of the Item Master Data), you should check that all the accounts for the warehouse have been set up under Administration => Set Up => Inventory => Warehouses => Accounting Tab.
In particulary you should check that you have defined an Expense Account for the specific warehouse in the GRPO document.
Also since you have chosen to affect the stock with additional expenses you need to specify an offsetting G/L account to the Stock account for clearing journal entries created by A/P Invoices and Goods Receipt POs.
I hope it solves your issue.
Kind Regards,
Magalie Grolleau
SAP Business One Forums Team

Freight condition on pallet level

Hi Guys
Iu2019m stuck with a problem for a condition for freight. Sorry if it's answered somewhere else in the forum, but I haven't found it yet.
Currently there is a freight condition working for this which basically is using KG and there is a scale, which identifies the freight cost.
The freight condition in KG is created as an item condition and as a group condition, i.e. when more than one material in the order then the freight cost is distributed to every material line.
This works excellent, but does of course face some problems in the scale values.
We now want to create a new freight condition, which basically is basing the freight determination upon the number of pallets.
I have then created a new condition, which is created as an item condition and as a group condition and the relevant master data.
I have a scale which says:
0-1 pallet 50u20AC/pallet
1-2 pallet 49u20AC/pallet
2-3 pallet 48u20AC/pallet
etc.
If a material for instance is 100 cartons per pallet then the condition determination for an order will be:
Order 1:
Pos.nr 10 100 cartons = 1 pallet = freight 50u20AC
Order 2:
Pos.nr 10 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Pos.nr 20 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Result = freight 50u20AC
Order 3:
Pos.nr 10 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Pos.nr 20 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Pos.nr 30 1 carton = 1/100 of a pallet
Result = freight = 49u20AC + 1/100th of 49u20AC = 49,49u20AC
Order 4:
Pos.nr 10 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Result = freight = 25u20AC
Order 1 + 2 would be OK u2013 but only because it matches a full pallet
Order 3 + 4 would not be OK. For order 3 the result should be 2x49u20AC and for order 4 the cost should be 50u20AC
I have been trying to use the Alternative formula for condition base value (to round up the number of pallets to a whole number), but as this is only calculated on position level I canu2019t see what to do. Additionally I think I have also tried every combination in the book for the customizing of the condition, butu2026u2026.
Can anyone please give me a hint as this would be highly valuated??
rgds
Steff

Hi Raghu
I have also had my ABAP'er experimenting a bit with AltCTyp to determine the number of pallets, but unfortunately not something succesfully yet.
The problem with the AltCTyp was that I could easily have an alternative calculation, which would use this to determine the number of pallets and thereby the scale, but it wouldn't give me the correct value back.
If I can use the example of a full pallet in line 10 and a sample carton in line 20, then the total number of pallets is 1 pallet and one carton, i.e. it will be sent on two pallets.
When using AltCTyp I got two options:
[1]: line 10 (the price of one pallet) + line 20 (the price of one pallet / no of cartons in pallet * 1
[2]: line 10 (the price of one pallet) + line 20 (the price of one pallet)
When using AltCTyp it's my understanding that it's calculating per item line - handling all lines and group values - and distributing the values to each line.
I miss the option of SAP providing me the sum of all lines. This sum should then look in the scales where it identifies that it's above 1 pallet but below two, identify that it should be 2 pallets. Then it should take this freight cost of two pallets and distribute the amount to the lines according to the quantity, so the result of sending an extra pallet for this one line 20 would have an impact on both lines.
Basically I had thought that the scale formula could provide this for me, but..............
I will have my ABAP'er have a look at your suggestion for the user exit
rgds
Steff

Freight condition modify after reverse GR

Hi,
I have done PO with freight condition FR1 and done GR again i reverse GR now i want to change my PO freight value but system is not allowed, in Config i have removed Dlivery cost B in Condition type now it will work but i want to know this is correct way or not or any other option.
What is use of Delivery cost B in PO,GR or MIRO, please explain this
Please suggest solution
Thank

hi
it is not possible to change value once GR is done
go for addition of new item (copy of original )
or take the freight in unplanned del cost

Freight Calculation in Standard cost Run

Hi,
The requirement is while doing the standard cost calculation through CK11N / CK40N system should show seperately how much is freight plan cost &; how much is duty plan cost.e.g.
100 is material price as per condition PB00 Cost element 355100
10 is freight cost (ZFR1 10%) Cost element 363170
5 is duty cost (Zduty lets say 0.5%) Cost element 363171
So taotal cost will be 115
I wanted to get this in cost component wise. Client does not want manual intervention so do not want to go for additive cost method
I had tried through Purchasing info record. I have maintained the valuation variant accordingly. Assigned correct sub strategy to it & also maintained delivery cost button in the same screen to assign conditions to origin group.
Also I had maintained purchasing info record through me11 ; mainteined conditions there.
These above mentioned cost elements are mapped in cost component structure in T code OKTZ. Seperately for material ,freight &; duty
Now when I make a PO, system is showing correct calculation as per the conditions.When I do the GR the Freight &; duty is getting posted &; these GLs are having above mentioned primary cost elements . .So the primary cost element is also getting posted correctly.
Now the problem is
While doing the cost run system shows me Seperate cost for material as 100 , seperate for freight 10 & seperate for duty 5, but to the same cost element i.e. 355100. So all the cost is shown as material cost ; nothing is displayed as freight or duty
If I see the cost element report the corresponding value is flown to the corresponding cost element. But it is not reflecting in proper cost component in cost run
.Please guide me why this is happening. How can I resolve this
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi Ajay,
I was waiting for your reply.
As mentioned by you, I have mapped my cost component structure like Raw material, Freigh, Duty & assigned the corresponding cost elements to it.. But still in itemisation view it shows three values
consumption cost element 355100 - 100
consumption cost element 355100 - 10 (which should go to freight component where I have assigned the Freight cost element)
consumption cost element 355100 -5 (which should go to Duty component where I have assigned the Duty cost element)
FI entries are getting posted correctly. Values are flown to coresponding cost elements.
For the time being We will keep duty part side. We are discussing with client on this.
But, what could be the reason of this problem. How I can achieve the below mentioned result.
Cost component view
Raw material -100
Freight - 10
Duty - 5

Post freight cost to a different a GL account during 411-K for consignment PO Process

We are planning to implement PO consignment for one of the client.
The scenario is, client pays the freight cost to the supplier in advance upon receipt of consignment stock .When consignment stock is moved to own stock (411k), during the movement of the stock we need to create two accounting entries one for the material cost and the other for freight cost such that the freight can be adjusted with advance paid freight cost. Freight cost can be settled manually with another PO but the requirement is moving average price of the material should include the cost of material and freight cost .
For an example if the material cost is $100(PB00) and freight cost is $10(FAR1 - 10%), during 411k it should create two entries one for material cost($100) and the other for freight cost($10) which can be adjusted manually.
We tried by adding freight condition (FRA1) in consignment info record along with PB00 –Gross price and in this case during 411k it is summing both the prices($110) and posting to one GL account and the same settles during MRKO but what we are looking for is how we can split this into $100 and $10 .
I know standard SAP does not support this this during 411k.
I want to know if there is any User exit, pricing procedure, routines, etc... Or any other way that can be used to achieve this requirement. Appreciate more detailed answer

Hi,
   As you know, currently the delivery cost are not supported in consignment and pipeline settlement. The system design is explained in the note: 208555 - MB11 Delivery costs for pipeline and consignment.
   If you want delivery cost in consignment, you have to go for development. There should be additional entry for delivery costs in RKWA table. I am not sure about the feasibility, but still would like to share the below points:
   For creating additional entry in the accounting document while doing MB1B / MB11, you may check the BADI AC_DOCUMENT.
   You may refer the note: 165647 - Documentation: Enhancement RMVKON00 (MM-IV) which explains some enhancements related to consignment settlement.
Regards,
AKPT

MIRO - Credit memo considering freight costs

Dear friends ,
We need to process a Goods Return to the vendor, but the goods has additional costs like Freight.
So we are doing the reversal process as follow:
MIRO - Credit memo
=> but when we process the credit memo the System brought together the freight costs.
we need to return but not remove the freight costs from the material cost.
MIGO movement 122.
=> here everything is ok.
Question:
How treat that situation where we need to keep the freight costs in the material account ?
Best regards,
Alessandro

hi
in that case, in miro header, there is a tab "details" here u have a option to enter unplanned dlvy cost.. u can enter ur unplanned dkvy cost.
ref the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/cb/370d3ae4533072e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Edited by: Jayakumar Raju A.S on Aug 17, 2009 3:00 PM

Freight addition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for