Freight Question

Hi,
The freight is charged agaist the total value of the order. There is a scale for the total value based on which the frieght is charged. If there are multiple items in an order and even if one if it is shipped, the complete freight corresponding to the total order should be invoiced. But for any delivery created for the other items in this order, no freight will be charged since it is already charged with the first delivery.
How should this be done?
Thanks,
GA

Hi ,
Say supporse on total value 100 frieght amt is 10 or 10%.
So if you have a sales order of 5 item , then the freight amt or percentage should be chaged . ie if you want to deliver one ie 1 item then the system should take 2 out of 10.
so maintain FR00 - header freight conditon - in the config of condition please trigger the group condition.
scale tab you trigger amount or value.
thanks
Kunlta

Similar Messages

  • Questions about Unplanned deliv cost as Freight in Invoice

    Hi Experts,
    I believe if you don't have any condition for freight in purchase order, then only way to charge freight in Invoice is by using "Unplanned deliv cost" field. My questions are:
    1. Is there any way that we can calculate tax on this unplanned deliv cost value?
    2. Can we have some tolerance limit for "Unplanned Deliv. cost". (e.g $500)?
    We are receiving invoice through EDI.
    Regards,
    Kamal

    1. Is there any way that we can calculate tax on this unplanned deliv cost value?
    Yes, you can. Go to OMR2 trasnaciton adn maintain the tax code for you rcompany than it will populate that in tax code in MIRO for unplanned
    if you want to see the tax code in MIRO than in the SPRO-MM-Invoice verificaiton-Incoming invoice- Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
    here you have to maintain the 2 in your company code
    than only you can see the tax code in MIRO for unplanned delivery cost
    2. Can we have some tolerance limit for "Unplanned Deliv. cost". (e.g $500)?
    No, this free form fiedl except you use the custom code or user eixt for this to control

  • Question on uplanned delivery costs need to go to GL account

    Hello
    I have a question regarding unplanned deliver costs. I am a FI analyst  Can you please explain my how I can solve my problem . My user wants unplanned delivery costs to go in to the GL account .
    In MM account determination GL account is set up but when I am doing MIRO
    . I am putting  total amount in amount field and freight costs in unplanned field under ‘detail ‘ section.
    When I simulate it gives me ‘tax code ‘ related warning when I hit enter it credit vendor and debits  GR/IR clearing and some debit  to inventory  account but not  to freight account,
    What’s  the problem. Can someone explain me :
    1)     What do I need to do to make it go to GL account ( account is set up but what is tax code related error . how do I fix that,
    2)     How does unplanned delivery costs work if I have tax, discount and freight.
    3)     Is tax calculated off total amount (inventory + freight) and discount too. How can I prevent that so that my tax is calculated just on inventory amount?
    4)     DO I have to put total in amount field (meaning inventory amount + fright ) or not .
    I will be grateful if someone can guide me towards right direction. Please give me a detailed answer. How does it work???
    Thanks
    Kavita Reddy

    Hi,
    1. If you eant ot post to a differnet GL account the GL tab is there.. there you have to mention the Gl account.. like Fb50.
    2. When you put some amount in unplanend delivery cost ..
    a. If material is Moving average price then the amount will be debited to inventory account
    b. If material is in standard price then it eill go to price differnece account.
    3. frieght vendor , discount why not u calculate through pricing schema in PO and after that in MIRP for firght vendor u will have different option..Just check with MM guys..
    4.answered in point 1.
    Hope it will helps ..
    Assign point if helpful
    regards
    PK

  • Question on unplanned delivery costs need to go to GL account ????

    Hello
    I have a question regarding unplanned deliver costs. I am a FI analyst  Can you please explain my how I can solve my problem . My user wants unplanned delivery costs to go in to the GL account .
    In MM account determination GL account is set up but when I am doing MIRO
    . I am putting  total amount in amount field and freight costs in unplanned field under ‘detail ‘ section.
    When I simulate it gives me ‘tax code ‘ related warning when I hit enter it credit vendor and debits  GR/IR clearing and some debit  to inventory  account but not  to freight account,
    What’s  the problem. Can someone explain me :
    1)     What do I need to do to make it go to GL account ( account is set up but what is tax code related error . how do I fix that,
    2)     How does unplanned delivery costs work if I have tax, discount and freight.
    3)     Is tax calculated off total amount (inventory + freight) and discount too. How can I prevent that so that my tax is calculated just on inventory amount?
    4)     DO I have to put total in amount field (meaning inventory amount + fright ) or not .
    I will be grateful if someone can guide me towards right direction. Please give me a detailed answer. How does it work???
    Thanks
    Kavita Reddy

    in standard setting the freight amount gets debit in the stock or inventoy account and gets credit in the fright accoutn at the time fo gr so it means the amount of frieght is gettting invenotrised
    now at the time of IV IN MIRO SYSTEM CREDITS THE VENDOR ACCOUNT AND DEBITS THE GR/IR account
    if u want to settele the planned delivery cost then select the laout variant for the planned delivery at item level
    or in case if u want to make use of the unplanned delivery cost then u r doing the right step
    but as u simulate the g/l accounts sytem will debit the inventory or stock account for it  rather then frieght account (i belive so )
    as the uplanned delivery cost may be getting inventorised that is added to the material price
    and as u said u dont want to have tax calulated on the unplanned delivery cost then i suggest u to post it as subsequent debit and there do not make use of the claulate tax option or do the direct posting for the g/l account option

  • Regarding additon of Freight charges and Revised Delivery date in Z Trans

    Hi All,
    My client is using Z Transaction ZSales_Book(Billing report) and he wants to add  two extra fields Freight Charges and Revised Delivery date to this report as it is related to VBAP saled document line item and how can we connect it to VBRP Billing document line item can i know the connecting fileds.
    As i passed it to ABAPER as a requirement he asked me the same question..........

    Hi
    Is it is a revised or request delivery date? Assuming it is a request delivery date i am using request terminology
    As you want to add two extra feilds freight charges and Request delivery date.
    For Freight Charges - If they are item level freight charges then you give the following tables data - VBAP,KOMV
    For Revised Delivery Date -  use the following data  - VBAP, RV45A-ETDAT also
    Regards
    Srinath

  • STO with freight--to beloaded on material at GR--Critical

    Hi,
    Scenario:Cross company stock transport
    Goods are transfered from plants A to B.
    PO in B with freight condition FRB1 is to be created.
    Goods issued against this PO.
    Goods are received in th B plant.
    B comes to know the EXACT freight costs ( clearing charges,customs transportation etc) only after goods reach to B, so he wants to enter/modify the EXACT cost at the time of GR ie to load this cost on material.
    But once GI is done, system does not allow to change/add the conditions in PO.
    How this can be handled so to have delivery costs loaded on material at the time of GR in plant B?
    This question has been raised by me earlier also but yet to find out any conclusive suggestion.This is very critical for me.
    PLEASE suggest how this type of requirement is mapped.I am sure this is a very commonly followed process in any industry and in SAP must be mapped.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    manOO

    Hi Sairam,
    Thanks for the feedback.
    In my case the exact delivery costs are only known when the goods reach the destination.
    I can put some prefixed value as the delivery cost.But once I issue the goods vide delivery created, I can not alter the freight costs.
    In most of the cases, it will be very difficult to put the exact costs in PO and that is the problem.
    How this can be handled then ?
    Is there any way by means of which we can have conditions in Inbound delivery by means of which I can create a Inbound delivery and put the exact conditions there ..
    Please suggest a another approach.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    manOO

  • Freight is not updated in R/3

    Friends,
    Freight is not updated in R/3 in the Extended Classic scenario after
    creating and ordering a PO with the Freight condition added.
    We have created a condition for Freight (Value and Percentage)in Create
    Payment Conditions using the following menu path:
    spro
    --> Supplier Relationship Management
       --> SRM Server
        --> Cross-Application Basic Settings
         --> Pricing
          --> Process Payment Conditions
    When creating a Purchase Order in SRM in the "Item Data" tab, there is a
    "Pricing" option.  Choose "Pricing" and select "Add Further Conditions"
    from the drop down menu.  Here Freight is available.  Add Freight and
    the PO record in SRM is updated with the Freight Condition.  However,
    upon ordering, the  Freight condition does not transfer to the PO record
    in R/3.
    Is there a setting or configuration that will allow the interface to
    include the Freight or any other condition?
    Software versions:
    SRM:
    SRM 5.0
    SRM_SERVER 550 -- Level 0006 -- SAPKIBKT06
    SAP_BASIS 7.0 -- Level 0009 -- SAPKB70009
    ECC:
    ECC 6.0
    SAP_BASIS 7.0 -- Level 0009 -- SAPKB70009
    This is my first posting ever so forgive me if I'm not asking this question in the correct manner.  Please feel free to let me know what I've done wrong.  Thanks.

    thanks Nick. In fact i have taken up this with SAP thro OSS stating that we have good functionality of pricing proceudre in R/3 or ECC system and loosing that advantage when go for Ext classic scenario in standard SRM .
    still it can be achieved by enhancement at our end...
    I have not got any constructive reply for this message .. we hope in latter versions SAP may come up with some modificaitons in standard itself without the requirement of enhancements....
    Regards
    Mani

  • MIRO - Credit memo considering freight costs

    Dear friends ,
    We need to process a Goods Return  to the vendor, but the goods has additional costs like Freight.
    So we are doing the reversal process as follow:
    MIRO - Credit memo
    => but when we process the credit memo the System brought together the freight costs.
          we need to return but not remove the freight costs from the material cost.
    MIGO movement 122.
    => here everything is ok.
    Question:
    How treat that situation where we need to keep the freight costs in the material account ?
    Best regards,
    Alessandro

    hi
    in that case, in miro header, there is a tab "details" here u have a option to enter unplanned dlvy cost.. u can enter ur unplanned dkvy cost.
    ref the link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/cb/370d3ae4533072e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    Edited by: Jayakumar Raju A.S on Aug 17, 2009 3:00 PM

  • Tax codes - can you set up default value for rows and freight? HELP!

    Hello - I have two issues with tax codes:
    1. When adding  a sales order if any of the rows do not have a value for "Tax Code"  I will get an error "Row without tax was found".
    - How can I get all rows on my sales orders, documents, etc to default to a specific tax code? Or will users ALWAYS have to enter the tax code?
    2. When addring a sales order with Freight, if the order is added without adding a tax code to the freight I will get an error "Expense with tax was found"
    - How can I get the tax code have a default value? We always use the same tax code, so it is redundant to have to enter this information.
    Any suggestions?

    Hi Jhon,
    this is the simplest and best way to make a Tax Code default is Go to
    Answer for Question 1
    Administration -> Setup -> Financial ->  Tax -> Tax Code Determination (Click on this)
    in that screen you can set a default tax code for both sales as well as Purchase.
    If you want to set Tax Code based on Vendors or Customers or Items separately then you can use the Key Fields.
    Answer for Question 2
    Once you enter the Tax Code in the freight i think it takes the Tax Code itself, I'm not so sure about this one though.
    Hope this helps you out
    regards,
    Shreyas

  • Freight Costing - Problem of G/L account with Cost Center

    Dear Gurus,
    In VI02, I have the following u201CAccount Assignmentu201D message of error:
    u201CG/L account 60900000 cannot be used (please correct)u201D
    u201CComparison of the field selection strings from the G/L account 60900000 and the account assignment category K reveals that there is an incompatible combination of field selections for the field selection group 'Earmarked Funds'.u201D
    Questions:
    Bearing in mind that I am in the Shipment Cost cockpit, I need to mention that the system directly allocated me the following Account Assignment Category: u201CKu201D for u201CCost Centeru201D.
    1-     I could there either way create another Account Assignment Category for Shipping instead of Cost Center
    2-     The system tells me about an incompatible combination of field selection, how can I change that field selection to make it compatible? There are so many possibilities that I get bogged down in choosing the right combination.
    I have been to OME9 and OB14 to try to maintain fields, however those fields have different values or names.
    My aim here is to coordinate a G/L account group with a Cost Center for Freight Costing
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks
    Chris

    Dear Zafar,
    If you desire you maintain two different cost centers for the two company and you need to have both of them posted on the same G/L account and Cost element, I would advice you to:
    - create a Z table where by controlling area you define where the specific cost center need to get posted
    - include this validation check in the exit for validation for controlling
    - include this validation check in the exit for validation for finance
    - include this validation check also in the sales order user exit
    Standard SAP seems do not have direct link between cost centers & cost elements. For this reason ideal solution is to generate a table where you may define you needed structure.
    E.g.: some ideas on the table you may create
    Controlling area
    Cost element from
    Cost element to
    Cost center from
    Cost center to
    I hope this suggestion may answer to your need.
    Regards,
    Viviana A.

  • Freight charges cannot be changed in PO

    Hi Masters
             I have created a import PO for a vendor X and freight charges in PO for the vendor Y for about 14000 JPY. MIGO and MIRO(delivery costs) has been done later.After that it is found that the freight charges is wrongly mentioned in the PO.The actual freight cost is 1300 JPY.
         So I cancelled the MIGO document and MIRO document to change the freight charge in PO.Although I have cancelled the both i cannot change the Freight charge in the PO.
    How to solve this?
    Regards
    Mohan

    Refer the OSS Note ::  457511
    Is it possible to change or add delivery costs in the purchase order after a goods receipt has been executed?
    Answer:
    No, this should not be possible. The system generates error message V1631 'You cannot enter new delivery costs' (V1631). Important: If your system does not behave in the manner described, this is an error that can be corrected using Notes 187694 and 196884. This affects the earlier Support Packages of Release 31I, 40B, 45B and 46B (you will find more detailed information in the two notes mentioned).
    For the changeability of delivery costs after an invoice receipt, see Note 651798 and Note 720191, or Note 549408.
    The existence of held delivery cost invoice documents must be checked manually and has to be considered.
    Delivery costs must not be entered again or changed if all follow-on documents were cancelled for the purchase order item, unless there were no delivery costs for the posted documents. Otherwise there is no guarantee that continued processing will run without errors.
    If you change the Customizing for existing delivery costs, the system does not read this either in a purchase order with an existing goods receipt. The new Customizing settings only take effect when you create a new purchase order.
    Of course, the condition values of time-dependent conditions can still be changed even after a goods receipt has occurred. See question four for information on how to change the master condition values.
    Please note:
    The restrictions on changing delivery costs as described above have only been developed over time. This is not due to changed functions, rather previously we did not know that making changes could sometimes lead to subsequent irreparable errors.
    In particular, when you post invoices for delivery costs, the logic considers delivery costs that have already been posted (even if they have since been cancelled) AND the data for delivery costs from the database (as displayed in the purchase order). During processing, you have no way of knowing if this information is no longer compatible, nor any way to discover the cause, and this leads to incorrect processing.
    You should therefore proceed as follows:
    If delivery costs were entered incorrectly, you must cancel all related purchase order items (reverse all documents) and enter a new purchase order item with the correct delivery costs. Otherwise, there is no guarantee that further processing will be correct.
    If your delivery costs are changed regularly, you should use master conditions.
    Additional note:
    If you have manually changed or maintained conditions in the purchase order, under certain Customizing settings when you run a new price determination after a goods receipt, a condition may be determined twice. For more information, see Note 456691, question 26.

  • PO with double freight

    Hi all,
    this is the problem.
    The customer created a PO with two lines of freight condition in the header of the PO, one with no value with the vendor A and one equal to 2000 eur with the vendor B.
    The PO has 6 lines: two of these (with the same material) have double freight condition, one with vendor A value 200 and one with vendor B value 300.
    The freight condition is manual and no material of the PO has the condition value specified in the record info.
    The questions are:
    1. why only for the first two lines the freight is splitted?
    2. why for the vendor A the freight value is > 0 if in the header is = 0?
    Please help me solve the problem.
    Thanks in advance.
    Anna

    Hi,
    Can be set with help of following t.codes to have default G/L account with  cost center in Service PO
    OME9, OMGO ,OMQW & OBYC
    Also check the blog:
    http://www.bluemarlinsys.com/ns/0603-03.asp
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Third-Party Order - Cost from PO incl. Freight into Sales Invoice

    Hello SD gurus,
    Had a question about drop shipments(Third Party Orders). At our company, the third-party order related PO sometimes has Freight/Customs conditions, but they do not come on to the VPRS(cost) condition on the corresponding Sales Invoice. What should I do to make them add up on VPRS?
    See sample PO conditions and history tabs below
    You can see the correct amount(including freight) shows up as cost of goods sold(in the accounting doc for its GR document) below
    But the VPRS line on the sales invoice only shows the GR amount, does not include freight/customs charges as seen below
    Is there any way I can get VPRS to include the Freight/Customs amounts as well. Please help me out....
    My third-party order copy control VTFA configuration for OR =>F2 for ItemCategory TAS, the billing quantity is currently set to F.
    Document Flow for our drop-ship orders is as follows: Creation of sales order triggers creation of a purchase requisition which in-turn gets converted into a PO. Once the GR happens on this Vendor PO the Goods Issue and Sales Invoice is triggered immediately. The Vendor IR comes last.
    Thanks and regards,
    Wayfarer

    Hello
    As per the standard Third party process, cost in the billing document will be picked from Invoice receipt of the vendor (MIRO).
    Basically here the cost determination happens from below three sources.
    1. MIRO (invoice receipt of Vendor)
    2.Goods receipts (MIGO )
    3.Purchase order
    Highest priority is given to the number 1. MIRO.
    In your both the cases, kindly check MIRO price & quantitiy.
    thank you
    Anirudh

  • "Late" Freight charges in third-party-sale

    Hello gurus,
    I have got a question concerning a rather unusual (in my view) third-party deal:
    As usual, there are three parties involved: Our company, our customer and our vendor. Our vendor charges varying freight charges depending on the ordered materials, quantities and several other factors. The problem is, that we do not always know the exact freight charges in advance and so we do not know what to charge our customers.
    Example:
    Our customer orders materials for 100$ (without freight charges). We order those materials to be delivered by our vendor. After the goods have arrived, our vendor invoices 20$ freight charge. Now we would like to charge those 20$ to our customer, but unfortunately, there is no condition for them in the SD order.
    I know, it is unusual to do this, but this is how this business works, unfortunately.
    Does anyone have an idea how to realize this? Is there any way to u201Ccopyu201D the 20$ from the incoming MM invoice into the SD order or at least the outgoing SD invoice?
    The only idea I had up to now was to maintain SD condition records for the freight charges so that we could at least charge an approximate freight charge in our customer invoice. Of course, it would be quite some work to always keep those condition records up to date. Maybe there is a way to create them from the MM condition records?
    Thanks in advance
    Alicia

    Hi,
    You can even automate the process.
    Ask the freight vendor to send the feight rate and sale order details in a flat file format. This can be dropped into an FTP server.
    Discuss with your basis team to develop a UNIX script or some other methods to pull the file from FTP server and put into SAP system folders.
    An ABAP program can be developed to read the flat file in the SAP system folder and further updates the sales orders with the frieght rates (Header level freight condition type). You can combine the above steps as a background job and run at frequent intervals say for every 2hours.
    As proposed earlier, when the user creates the 3rd party sales order, they can apply the billing block (You can make it as default also for this order type). When the background job runs, after applying the frieght rate value on the freight rate condition type at header level, the same program can remove the billing block.
    We are running this scenario with our frieght vendors, but at delivery document level (not for 3rd party orders). It is working good.
    Regards

  • Incomimg Payment / AR invoice B1 2005 Question

    I have an issue with and Incoming Payment in B1 2005
    I appled a check to 2 invoices.  First Invoice had a Credit Memo applied to part of the balance.  The check was for the remaing balance on the forst invoice plus the total of the second invoice.  When viewing the forst Invoice,  the Invoice shows closed in the status field,  with total amout applied the same as the inoivce total.  On the Customer's AR inquiry screen,  the first invoice show it is closed.  The second invoice when viewed,  shows closed with the amout applied the same as the balance.  But on the Customer's AR screen,  the Invoice shows the invoice open for the full amount.   When I go into Incoming Payments for the Customer is question,  in a greyed out box just to the left of the box that shows the amount of the invoices selected for payment,  the amount of the second invoice is deiplayed in that box.  If I check the On Account check box,  the amount is then displayed in the box of the amount to be distributed.   Has anyone seen this before?  If I goe into Automatic reconcillations,  the Invoice shows open but the Payment is no where to be seen.  I was hoping in one of the various reconcilations that I would be able to apply the amout to the Invoice,  but only the Invoice is displayed as open. 
    Does anyone have any idea on how to close the Invoice COMPLETELY?  And also what does the Amount in the Box to the left of the ORCT.NoDocSUm field represent and how to I apply or get ride of the amount?
    Thanks in advance for any input!
    Dana

    Hi Michelle ,
    Your invoice might not have closed because of rounding issues or
    i have found one issue at delivery before :
    1.If your freight code donot match between delivey and invoice , it doesn;t get closed .
    It could be one of the issue might be happening ..
    Otherwise log a support to SAP for further analysis ..
    Thank you
    Bishal

Maybe you are looking for

  • Password change fails in SQL Developer with verify function...

    A couple of months ago I enforced a password verify function on our 11.2.0.3 databases and also one legacy 10.2.0.4 database. At the time I tested on my account (which had elevated privileges...doh!).   Now some users are hitting expiry, they can't c

  • Windows Vista and Airport Extreme USB Disc

    While I'm thrilled with my multiple Macs and their effortless ability to connect to my printers and USB hard drive on my Airport Extreme, my wife's new Windows Vista confuser isn't quite as seamless. When I try to connect to my hard drive using Windo

  • IMovies Quality problems..

    Hi All.. Looking for some help - Started to use iMovie to create a slideshow of pics and the various effects available but seem to be having some quality issues when i play back... when I'm chosing the titles (this is imovie '06) the examples look al

  • Load  and save multi value checkbox value  dynamically to the table

    How to retrieve data for multi value checkbox ?

  • SAP ehs

    Hi everybody, I am fresher . I want know about EHS . What is the conceptual knowledge of EHS module . Why it is developed this .EHS means Enevirmental Health &safty .but i want know the meaning clearly in simple words . Please tell me required inform