FS15 and FS15 in ECC 5.0 and 4.6C

Hi, is there any difference between the transactions in ECC 5 and 4.6C.
I was trying to import GL accounts from 4.6C(with tcode-FS15) and export into ECC 5.0(with tcode-FS16) and i was endedup with the error "Transaction type 01000 not valid in record type Y".
Please suggest me.
Thanks.

The export/import should work the way you are using it. Just make sure you are using same memory id and make sure its unique - meaning u are using it only for this itab purpose and not overwriting it with other values. Check itab is not initial before you export in program 1 - then import it in prog2 with same memory id...also check case, I am not sure if its case sensitive...
Here is how you use the second variant...
Two fields with two different identifications "P1" and "P2" with the dynamic variant of the cluster definition are written to the ABAP Memory. After execution of the statement IMPORT, the contents of the fields text1 and text2 are interchanged.
TYPES:
  BEGIN OF tab_type,
    para TYPE string,
    dobj TYPE string,
  END OF tab_type.
DATA:
  id    TYPE c LENGTH 10 VALUE 'TEXTS',
  text1 TYPE string VALUE `IKE`,
  text2 TYPE string VALUE `TINA`,
  line  TYPE tab_type,
  itab  TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tab_type.
line-para = 'P1'.
line-dobj = 'TEXT1'.
APPEND line TO itab.
line-para = 'P2'.
line-dobj = 'TEXT2'.
APPEND line TO itab.
EXPORT (itab)     TO MEMORY ID id.
IMPORT p1 = text2
       p2 = text1 FROM MEMORY ID id.

Similar Messages

  • Using the Open Catalog Interface (OCI) between SAP-ECC 6.0 and SAP-MDM

    Hello ASUG Community.
    I'm working on an SAP-MDM project where we will configure the OCI interface between SAP-ECC 6.0 and SAP-MDM.  The business requirement will be to punch out to SAP-MDM's catalog from SAP-ECC for expensed items (e.g., no material master record exists in SAP-ECC).
    The data that will be returned to SAP-ECC will be purchase price info, material group, short text, & our global SAP-MDM item number.
    The question I've been trying to design around is "where to store the SAP-MDM item number"?
    I've looked into creating a custom filed on EKPO but now feel that a configured text field will be the best solution from an SAP-ECC point of view (less effort on the SAP-ECC side from a development perspective, no need to regenerate the EKPO table, etc.).
    The question I'd like to pose to ASUG is.... Does anyone have experience or an opinion to offer using this functionality?  It seems that I will have to code in a user exit or BAdi to insure that the SAP-MDM item numbers are returned to the appropriate text field on my POu2019s.  Or can this be done using the standard OCI functionality?
    I found OSS note 1347656 which references BADI "ME_CATALOG_INTERFACE" but I'm not sure if this right path to go down or if this would be the correct place to code non-conforming OCI mapping requiremetns.
    Any insight would be most appreciated.
    Thanks.  Sincerely,
    Rich Wortmann

    I would suggest you create a new field for this as you may require thois going forward for reporting as well. Text fields are difficult to report.
    Sorry not sure about the BADI to use.

  • SAP Support for Classic G/L in ECC 6.0 and above

    Hello,
    Running an SAP upgrade project from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 (EHP6). The customer is running the existing release since the past 8 years with FI/CO, MM,SD,PM and HCM modules.
    We are exploring the possibilities and repercussions of moving on to new G/L from the legacy classic G/L. Please have a look at the mentioned points for replies accordingly.
    1. As far as I understand, if need to seamlessly transit in the ECC 6.0 with New G/L in a way that the old transactional data, and all balances are retained with historical records, then we need to purchase the SAP New G/L Migration Services, and this would be lead and done by SAP. There is no alternate way of doing it solely by our ownself, Is this correct ?. If we engage SAP for this migration exercise and consulting then does it ensure that all historical data and balances are moved intact in the new G/L environment and from an end user perspective all transactional done to date before moving in ECC 6.0 are retained.
    2. I guess we still need to review the integration impact of the new G/L for all other modules, is there a substantial rework to be done or with minimal effort, new account assignments and related configuration can be altered .
    3. If we don't opt for SAP G/L Migration service but still want to activate and use the new G/L and profit center accounting, then as far as myself and my team assess, we need to decide a cutover date and gather the balances/open items from the legacy G/L and upload them to the new G/L in ECC 6.0, just as it would be the case for a fresh new implementation for a customer coming from non-SAP environment. If this is correct then :    
    The customer will lose all historical, detailed transactional data with respect to the legacy G/L and relevant originating entries. In such case for any business reporting requirement, the customer has to keep a separate PRD server alive in a dormant state for fetching the data before the transition in ECC 6.0 environment. Is this the correct understanding and the only possible approach, can there be a better way of ensuring the availability of historical data.
    In such a case of doing a cutover data migration from old G/L to new G/L, do we have to upload the rest of the master/transactional data for all other modules as well, enacting a situation that all of them started as fresh new modules in ECC.6.0,  or the legacy master / transactional data for all other modules can be kept intact for historical purposes. (examples, all vendors and PO / sales order and customer master / employee master and all payroll historical records for past 8 years).
    4. Any indication or official SAP note, that for how long SAP intends to support the legacy G/L in the upcoming ECC versions. It is necessary to know in case the customer currently opts for still continuing with the classic G/L in ECC 6.0 , but we have a lurking danger that SAP would stop the support and availability of legacy classic G/L in the near future. So to a have a long term sustainable benefit, we might deliberate with the customer to take a bitter sip now , and move on to the new G/L with all its bells/whistles and the nuisances it might bring in terms of historical transaction data unavailability.
    I hope i was able to make my scenario clearly understandable for having some valuable input from the forum members.
    Thanks a lot for reading and replying.

    Hi Syed,
    From Technical basis perspective there is not much work in newGL migration apart from application and database tuning.
    Time taken for migrating to newGL will depend upon number of open items available in the system at the time of migration.
    Most of your queries are functional and suggestion would be to move this thread to ERP Financials.
    For your information you may go through below links
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/ae/b3569044974c6985c4e711e20435d6/content.htm
    http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/NewGL+Migration+Scenarios
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Deepak Kori

  • ECC 6.0 and BI Authorizations in Project Implementation Phase for Dev only

    I ) ECC 6.0 Authorizations for Project Team
         I have browsed through SDN and gone through several documents and perhaps trying to post our senario as clearly as possible for better answers
    Aim : 1) To give appropriate authorizations to
          a) Functional Consultants
          b) ABAP developers
          c) BI consultants 
          in Development environment only on Customizing client,
          sandbox client and unit testing client
    There is no inhouse security consultant in house at this time.
    Type of Oragnization : Midsize
    project Life cycle phase : Bluprint-Realization
    Question1:
         What role and profile should I assign to functional consultants by preparing a role from the SAP standard role and what is the best way to restrict functional consultants from sensitive areas.
    eg: Modifying SAP_ALL option and assigning it to functional consultants.
    II.
    BI 7.0 Authorizations for BI consultants in Development environment
    Aim: 1) To give authorizations to BI 7.0 consultants (using only ABAP          stack)
      Question: I have read through some forum and wiki answers in sdn and many explain that give SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW to BI consultants and in addition give 0bi_all, SAP_BW_DEVELOPER and much more.
        Can some body list what are the needed Roles for this kind of users ?
    I know in theory many talk, do not assign SAP_ALL, but the person who advice this never explained the best alternative, and none of them I know have practially told that they have not assigned SAP_ALL.
    Please explain . I think asnwering my question will bury many questions in this fourm .

    Hi Nick,
    Did you get the answer? I'm lookinf for the same information about profiles.
    Thanks!!

  • Install ECC 6.0 and Solution Manager on same server Error (MaxDB/Linux)

    I have installed Solution manager on one server and then ECC 6 also in the same server with another SID. during the installation it errored out at phase "SLD configuration" with UME error , J2EE_ADMIN locked etc..we checked the user id and noticed it got locked in ECC 6 system and we unlocked it.
    But after the ECC installation the solution manager java engine is not coming up error with "com.sap.security.core.ume.service failed" error. Prior to the ECC installation the Solution Manager J2EE was working.
    thanks in advance
    Mathew

    error in the /j2ee/cluster/server0/log/defaultTrace.1.trc
    is as follows
    #1.5#00137256A483001E0000001700006F190004163784D40864#1150327614343#com.sap.engine.core.Framework##com.sap.engine.core.Framework#######SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_61##0#0#Fatal#1#/System/Server#Plain###Critical shutdown was invoked. Reason is: Core service com.sap.security.core.ume.service failed. J2EE Engine cannot be started.#
    When I looked at using jcmon the dispacher is up and the server0 and SDM is down

  • Difference between ECC 6.0 and earlier versions

    Hi,
    one of the difference between ECC 6.0 and earlier versions is that instead 'WS_UPLOAD'  and 'WS_DOWNLOAD' in ECC we should use 'GUI_UPLOAD' and 'GUI_DOWNLOAD'  respectively.
    (of course SPDD and SPRO tcodes is known by everone i suppose)
    Similarly can u all put down some differences here, atleast one entry by each, I think we can make a good docu. I have searched the net for the differences but could not get much, so by each of us contributing one each, it would become good docu..for all of us.
    Thanx in advance

    Unicode Errors Encountered and their Solutions
    E1. In u201CTEXT MODEu201D the u201CENCODINGu201D addition must be specified.
         Error:
         OPEN DATASET FILE FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE.
         Solution:
         OPEN DATASET FILE FOR OUTPUT IN LEGACY TEXT MODE.
    E2. In Unicode, DESCRIBE DISTANCE can only be used with the IN BYTE MODE  or  IN
          CHARACTER MODE  addition.
         Error:
         DESCRIBE DISTANCE  BETWEEN T_KOMK AND T_KOMK-HIEBO01 INTO BPOS.
         Solution:
    DESCRIBE DISTANCE  BETWEEN T_KOMK AND T_KOMK-HIENR01 INTO BPOS
    IN CHARACTER MODE.
    E3. u201CUSR02-UFLAGu201D must be a byte-type field (Typ X or XSTRING )
         Error:
         IF USR02-UFLAG O YULOCK.
         Solution:  Since the data type of USR02-UFLAG is type INT and is compared with data type
                    X u2013 Hence the error. So we  define a new variable ZULOCK and assign the
                    value of USR02-UFLAG to ZULOCK.
                  New variable             
                  DATA: ZULOCK(1) TYPE X.   "APBRP00
                  Assign value               
                                ZULOCK = USR02-UFLAG.
            Compare -
                   IF ZULOCK = YULOCK.   u201Creplace IF USR02-UFLAG O YULOCK.
    E4.  HT cannot be converted to a Character type field
    Error :
    WRITE ht TO t_data+10(2).
    Solution : Since the data type of ht is a type u2018Xu2019 and the data is been transfer to
             t_data which has a data type u2018Cu2019. value of one data type cannot be copy to
             another data type where one of them is type string .Hence the error occur,
             so the data type of ht is been change to Type u2018Cu2019
         OR
               A Tab ( value 09 ) is introduced as part of the row. The value 09 is not converted in Unicode environment. Instead we need to use class
         Error:
              DATA: BEGIN OF ht,
                   x(1) TYPE x VALUE '09',
              END OF ht.
         Solution:
                  Define Class after the Tables definition.
                       CLASS cl_abap_char_utilities DEFINITION LOAD.
                  Data Defination :  Comment internal table HT and define a variable HT type C.
           *   Insert + APRIA00 05/02/2007 Unicode project
           *   DATA: BEGIN OF ht,
         *         x(1) TYPE x VALUE '09'
           *   END OF ht.
         *   Insert - APRIA00 05/02/2007 Unicode project
           DATA HT type C.
           Before using HT assign Horizontal tab.
                     Ht = CL_ABAP_CHAR_UTILITIES=>HORIZONTAL_TAB.  
    E5.  In Unicode programs the u201C#u201D cannot appear in names, as it is does here in the name    u201C#LINESu201D
         Error :
         #LINES                 TYPE I,
         Solution : Since the # is used in the start of name, it is not allowed. We need to
                  remove it. 
         Solution for the above
         V_LINES                 TYPE I,
    E6. In u201CTEXT MODEu201D the u201CENCODINGu201D addition must be specified as well as the addition was required FOR OUTPUT,FOR INPUT, FOR APPENDING OR FOR UPDATE was expected.
         Error:
         OPEN DATASET PATH_NAME IN TEXT MODE.
         Solution:
         Download =     OPEN DATASET PATH_NAME FOR OUTPUT IN LEGACY TEXT MODE.
         Upload        =  OPEN DATASET AUSZUG-FILE IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
    E7. u201CTABu201D must be a character-type data object( data type C,N, D, T or String). Field string)    
         Error:
                data: begin of tab,                   "Excel Parameter Split at TAB
            t type x value '09',          "Tabulator
           end of tab.
                concatenate 'Material' 'Package Status'
                    into z_download-line separated by tab.
                ( In the above command  the two field are to be separated with a horizontal Tab. The earlier      way of assigning the tab value u201809u2019 will not work in Unicode environment.
         Solution:
         Define a  class just after the Table defination.
              CLASS cl_abap_char_utilities DEFINITION LOAD.
                Define  variable Tab as shown below :
              Data : TAB           TYPE C.
         Before the concatenate statement assign the value of Tab using pre-defined attributes.
              TAB = CL_ABAP_CHAR_UTILITIES=>HORIZONTAL_TAB.
    E8. Upload/Ws_Upload and Download/Ws_Download are obsolete, since they are not Unicode-
          enabled; use the class cl_gui_frontend_services     
         Error-1:  Function WS_DOWNLOAD is obsolete in Unicode environment.
                call function 'WS_DOWNLOAD'
                     exporting
                          filename = zfilename
                     tables
                          data_tab = z_download.
         Solutions-1: Instead of WS_DOWNLOAD use  GUI_DOWNLOAD.
    CALL FUNCTION 'GUI_DOWNLOAD'
      EXPORTING
    *   BIN_FILESIZE                  =
        FILENAME                      = zfilename
      TABLES
        DATA_TAB                      = z_download.
    E9.  The "/" character is reserved for identification of namespaces. It must be entered twice.
            The name  of a namespace must be at least 3 characters long.
         Error :      
                     U/N(3)        TYPE C,  "U/N    --> ERSETZT DURCH SPACE
         Solution :
         * Special character can not be used to define a data variable
         *      U/N(3)        TYPE C,  "U/N    --> ERSETZT DURCH SPACE
                  U_N(3)        TYPE C,  "U/N    --> ERSETZT DURCH SPACE
         * Insert - APSUS02 07/02/2007 Unicode Project
    E10.  "LP_TAB" and "CS_TAB" are not mutually convertible. In Unicode programs,
             "LP_TAB" must have the same structure layout as "CS_TAB", independent of the length
             of a Unicode character.
         Error : This error is encountered when data from one internal table is copied to another
                             internal table which different structure. In this case its LP_TAB & CS_TAB.
                     LP_TAB[] = CS_TAB[].
         Solution :
              * Replace + APSUS02 07/02/2007  Unicode Project
    *   LP_TAB[] = CS_TAB[].
                  move-corresponding CS_TAB to LP_TAB.
              * Replace + APSUS02 07/02/2007  Unicode Project
    E11.  Could not specify the access range automatically. This means that you need a RANGE
              addition.          
         Error :  Range need to be specified as an addition to the command.
                DO 4 TIMES VARYING HELP_CHAR FROM ABCD(1) NEXT ABCD+1(1).
               Solution : 
                DO 4 TIMES VARYING HELP_CHAR FROM ABCD(1) NEXT ABCD+1(1)
              * Insert + APSUS02 07/02/2007  Unicode Project.
                                                          RANGE ABCD+0(4).
    * Insert - APSUS02 07/02/2007  Unicode Project.
    E12 .  Processing Terminated Error code: Error in opening /
                                              Path not found when downloading to Unix directory.
         Error : PARAMETER: outfile(92) DEFAULT
                  '/CP/interface/NPP/data/MX/cbslaprcpts'
                        LOWER CASE,
                   kmxmstrd AS CHECKBOX.
                This error is encountered when the path is missing. The above path is related to CCP.
         Solution:  For testing purpose comment the original path and replace it with
                                     /CP/interface/CCD/Unicode_test/ 
    E13.    Upload/Ws_Upload and Download/Ws_Download are obsolete, since they are not                                                                       Unicode- enabled; use the class cl_gui_frontend_services
         Error: Function WS_UPLOAD is obsolete in Unicode environment. (During UCCHECK)
                   Call function 'WS_UPLOAD'
           Exporting
                Filename                = zfilename
                Filetype                = u2018DATu2019
           Tables
                data_tab                = z_upload
           Exceptions
                Conversion_error        = 1
                file_open_error         = 2
                file_read_error         = 3
                invalid_table_width     = 4
                invalid_type            = 5
                no_batch                = 6
                unknown_error           = 7
                gui_refuse_filetransfer = 8
                others                  = 9.
         Solution: Instead of WS_UPLOAD use TEXT_CONVERT_XLS_TO_SAP. Do not use temporary file put the file name as it is.
    1) First define a type pool and a variable of type truxs_t_text_data.
    TYPE-POOLS: truxs.
    DATA: it_raw TYPE truxs_t_text_data.
         2) Use this it_raw in the function module in parameter i_tab_raw_data. Put file name and the internal table in the function module.
    CALL FUNCTION 'TEXT_CONVERT_XLS_TO_SAP'
        EXPORTING
    *     I_FIELD_SEPERATOR        =
    *      i_line_header            =  ' '
          i_tab_raw_data           =  it_raw       " WORK TABLE
          i_filename               =  zfilename
        TABLES
          i_tab_converted_data     = z_upload[]    "ACTUAL DATA
       EXCEPTIONS
          conversion_failed        = 1
          OTHERS                   = 2.
         Comment u201Ci_line headeru201D. It takes the first/ header line of the file which is to be uploaded.
    Put  square brackets after internal table as shown above.
    E14.    CURSORHOLD may not be converted into a number.
         Error:  GET CURSOR LINE CURSORHOLD VALUE CURSOR_HOLD.
         Solution: In the declaration part of CURSORHOLD, one field is of u2018Pu2019 type and one field is of u2018Iu2019 type, which is not allowed in Unicode environment.So change the the type of it to NUMC.  

  • R/3 upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and BW upgrade from 3.5 to 7.0

    Is there a reason to upgrade Solution Manager from 3.2 to 4.0 when upgrading R/3 from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and BW upgrade from 3.5 to 7.0?
    And when in current situation Unicode UTF8 is used, could that give problems during / after the upgrade?

    Hello ALex,
    There is not a must to upgrade also your solman 3.2 when you upgrade your satellites, only consider if you need the solman diagnostic or not and also that the new functionality in solman 4.0.
    Which system is unicode, the satellite?
    There is also not problems having a non-unicode solman with unicode satellites and the other, having a unicode-solman "linked" to unicode-satellites.
    Hope this helps,
    Dolores

  • Data Consistency when Copying/ Refreshing ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0 Systems

    Hello,
    We are planning a refresh / system copy of an ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0 system
    The refreshes will be completed from backups taken of production systems refreshed onto the QA Landscape.
    I have referenced the following SDN thread that provides some guidelines on how to refresh R/3 and SRM systems and maintain data consistency between the systems using BDLS and changing entries that correspond to backend RFC destinations:
    [Is there a process/program  to update tables/data after System Refresh?;
    This thread is fairly old and relates to earlier versions of R/3 (4.7) and SRM (3.0).  We have heard that at higher system versions there may be technical reasons why a refresh canu2019t be performed.
    Does anyone have experience of completing successful refreshes of landscape that contain ECC and SRM systems at higher SAP versions (ideally ECC 6.0 and SRM-SUS 5.0)  Does anyone know whether it is technically possible?
    Are there any additional steps that we need to be aware of at these higher SAP versions in completing the copy to ensure that the data remains consistent between ECC and SRM?
    Thanks
    Frances

    I have seen this somewhere in the forum: See if this helps you
    BDLS: Convertion of logical system (SRM).
    Check entry in table TWPURLSVR.
    Check RFC connections (R/3 and SRM)
    SPRO, check or set the following points:
    Set up Distribution Model and distribute it
    Define backend system
    Define backend sytem per product category
    Setting for vendor synchronization
    Numbe ranges
    Define object in backend sytem
    Define external services (catalogs)
    Check WF customizing: SWU3, settings for tasks
    SICF: maintain the service BBPSTART, SAPCONNECT
    SE38:
    Run SIAC_PUBLISH_ALL_INTERNAL
    Run BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL
    Update vendor BBPUPDVD
    Check Middleware if used.
    Run BBP_GET_EXRATE.
    Schedule jobs (bbp_get_status2, clean_reqreq_up)
    Convert attributes with RHOM_ATTRIBUTE_REPLACE

  • Difference Between SAP ECC 6.0 and SAP Solution

    Dear Experts,
       We are in the process of implementing a new SAP Structure.
        We are taking a hosted model from vendor which is called SBH (Subscription Based Hosting) of SAP Solution
      So my question to all experts is that, what is the exact difference between SAP ECC 6.0 and SAP Solution SBH model.
       If any comparison chart,  it would be helfull.
    Do reply asap.
    Thanks in advance,
    Nilesh Jain

    Hi Nilesh,
    Looking at the image below, you will find out that ECC6 is under SAP ERP, and SAP ERP is under SAP Solution:
    SAP solution is of a bigger element and ECC 6 is a component of it.
    Regards,
    Rod

  • Differences between SAP 4.7, SAP ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0

    Hello SAP Gurus,
    Could someone please let me explain, what are the main differences between SAP 4.7, SAP ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0.
    Thanks
    Sha

    Hi,
    Check in this link
    http://erp.fmpmedia.com/Default.aspx?alias=erp.fmpmedia.com/english

  • PPDS: I have a setup matrix in SAP ECC 6.0, and want to transfer the same to APO using Core Interface.

    PPDS: I have a setup matrix in SAP ECC 6.0, and want to transfer the same to APO using Core Interface. Has anyone done it before?

    Hi Subhash,
    Please open this link to see the details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/89/bd3e42ce98033be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    You perform the data transfer in the following sequence:
    Plant
    Setup groups
    Work centers
    Routings
    You check the setup groups in SAP APO.
    You create the setup matrixes in SAP SCM.
    Thanks, Marius

  • SAP ECC 6.0 and mySAP ERP

    Hello Gurus,
    Could somebody tell me the difference between SAP ECC 6.0 and mySAP ERP
    Thanks and reward guaranteed

    Hi,
    These are versions of SAP.
    you can findout the differences between these two versions from the following link
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    Regards
    Ali

  • Data mismatch with ECC FBL5N report and debtor ageing report(BI side)

    Hi,
    I am facing a data mismatch problem with FBl5N(t-code for customer line item report) report in ECC side and Debtor ageing report in BI side.
    The problem is
    1) there are mismatch of data with some customer amounts in both ECC and Bi side.
    2) and also there are customer Nos with amounts in BI Debtor ageing report which are not there in the ECC FBL5N(t-code for customer line item report)
    for the second problem, I checked in the Tables BSID,BSAD in ECC side ,there also these customer Nos are not available.
    One more strange thing is that with the same selectionin report on both ECC and BI reports the data mismatch and The extra customers in Bi reports are changing everyday, i.e. we are getting new set of data mismatch and extra customers Nos in BI Side.
    If anyone  have worked on this type of issue.....kindly help...
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    on the one hand it may be delta mechanism of FI_*_4 extractors with the timestamps issue, that your comparision between BI and ECC is at no time up to date.
    FI Extraction
    on the other hand, it may be the delta problem between data targets in your BI-System, in case you load the FI-Data from a DSO to a cube and make a report on the cube. I have this problem at the moment and will watch this thread for more suggestions.

  • What are the best ways (for best performance) in MII to process the incoming process messages from shop floor systems to SAP ECC 6.0 and vice versa?

    Hi All,
    Can you please suggest to choose the best ways (for best performance) in MII (12.2 on NW 7.3), to process the incoming process messages from shop floor systems to SAP ECC 6.0 and vice versa?
    Thanks

    Hi Surya,
    Best practices for flow of data from ECC --> SAP MII --> Shop floor & Vice verse:
    1. Send ECC data through IDOC's/RFC's as messages to SAP MII message listener and BSL transaction process data and update directly on shop floor database as if you configured in Data services or later send those data by web service to shop floor system (i.e. depends on Shop floor machines).
    From Shop floor:
    shop floor --> SAP MII --> ECC
    1. Use either Web service or fetch data from DB and pass data to BAPI's  for sending to ECC through BLS transaction.
    Regards,
    Praveen Reddy

  • ECC 5.0 and BO without BW/BI Integration Best Practise

    Hi,
    I know that SAP can connect with BO system using RapidMart (replacing data warehouse BW/BI). Is this best practise?Because when i see the BI Platform RoadMap,I conclude that BI and BO will be integrate into one product, and i'm afraid to invest right now because in the future it seems we need to implement the BW system to make this BI system optimal.
    My company want to use BO without implement BW system right now. SAP system that we use right now is ECC 5.0 and my company only upgrade it to next version when version 5.0 not supported again.Thank you.
    Cheers,
    Satria

    Hi Satria,
    the answer depends a little bit on what the requirement is.
    RapidMarts are an option to implement a data mart solution on top of an ERP solution. On top of the Rapid Marts you can then use the BusinessObjects tools without hitting the OLTP system directly.
    Ingo

Maybe you are looking for