G550 with geforce g150m gpu core temperature question

my gpu core goes 77 when not using any games ... and goes high as 103 c approximately... should i be worried ? i mean it still work normal. using riva tuner to see core temp....
nfo file of laptop
where should i clean if necessary

the temperature should be about 39c* while idle
it looks like you are having "cooling" issue.
have you tried to clean fan?
*according to this review

Similar Messages

Best preference settings for MacBook Pro Retina Mid 2012 with 2.7 Ghz Core i7 processor 16GB memory Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 1024MB processor

(using latest AE CC2014)
I have a MacBook Pro Retina Mid 2012 with 2.7 Ghz Core i7 processor 16GB memory Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 1024MB processor, doing some heavy AE renderings and just realized that this machine says it has 8 Cores? I'm had not yet turned on Multprocessing in Preferences Should I be?
Should I leave 1 or 2 cores for other applications?
RAM allocation per background CPU is defaulted set to 3GB
Also for Adobe Media Encoder: in preferences under Video Rendering /Rendere it is set at Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (OpenCL) is that the best config for this computer?

How much ram?
The best settings depend on what you are working on. Here are mine for a nearly identical system:
It's usually best to keep memory blocks in 4GB blocks. If my workflow is more in other apps I'll switch out other apps to 8 gb if things start to slow down. Because of my usual project settings I keep MP turned off on this machine, but for some projects I'll turn it on. If you decide to experiment to MP then keep an eye on the Actual CPU's that will be used and make sure the numbers add up. Other applications and Actual Cores should add up the the total in your system.

X100e, It's burning my pants with very low core temperature

Hi,
I got X100e just a day ago. All day long, I did so many updates. During that, there were sevreal sudden reset or freezings.
Also, sometimes the bottom of X100e gets pretty hot, so I checked core temperature. However, it was the coolest CPU that
I ever seen. Even, one time, it was 2 celcius degree. I checked the temperature of the core using Core Temp, Speed Fan, and rmclock, all similar readings. I am not sure what theproblem is. Is it sensor issue or software issue?

it's often hard to get a consensus on anything, but my opinion is that it's a mixture of comfort-level, flexibility, and quality.
• i've heard lots of good things about the Snowball, and it's simple
• a mixer and good mic would offer greater flexibility for recording different things while adding a level of complexity (if you're not familiar with using consoles, etc) and possibly lowering quality if you use cheap gear.
a lot depends on what you want to do, and what you expect from your final product.
and after saying all that, i remembered that you're talking about strictly voice for a podcast. i think for the simplicity alone i might lean toward the USB mic, it would provide excellent quality for podcasting, and not put more things in your signal chain to deal with when recording.

Graphics Corruption in Some Apps - Problem with Geforce GT750

Hi
I am recently facing a graphics corruption problem with my 2013 MBPr. Yesterday I noticed that the window that shows the mail in Mail.app suddenly showed just some noise (just some strange colors). I restarted the app and it was gone. Then I installed a game named "Tales from the Borderlands". On the menu of the game I noticed the corruption again. Every time I would exit and rerun the game, the distortion would randomly change. Here are some examples:
The problem appeared throughout the game too.
Then I forced "Integrated Only" using a gfxCardStatus to use Intel Iris Pro instead of Geforce GT750. I started the game and the problem was gone. I tried some more times again by switching GPUs and every time I noticed that the problem is with Geforce GT750 and Intel Iris Pro has no problem.
Any ideas what is causing the problem and what should I do? Thanks in advance for any help.

Hi Tormirez,
I can't believe my eyes.. I actually was afraid this might happen.
Since I've been following the 2011 MBP forum after i had my MBP repaired (reflow by someone near Antwerp, Belgium), I've been learning some specific things about the very likely nature of these GPU issues.
All these issues seem to be related to the replacement of leaded solder by nearly pure tin solder + not soldering according to the best profile (temperature vs time).
The factor of time saving = money saving may very well play a role here.
When you consider the nature of that leaded solder problem versus the soldering profiles, it's not hard to imagine that the problem isn't just in the 2011 model range, but may actually have started FROM that range...! I've already heard that some 2012 models also failed in a similar way.
It may all be quite logical; tin solder needs a roughly 60ºC higher temperature to get into full liquid state then leaded solder.
As the cheapest way to produce boards is probably rolling entire boards through ovens, melting the parts on it, it would require very precise monitoring of temperatures UNDER the CPU and GPU, to be SURE you have a full flow going on.
But, at the same time, as you're cooking ALL components around 240ºC, they may have chosen not to stay at this temperature long enough. Or, maybe they stop at 240ºC, while 242ºC might be the minimum required temperature to guarantee full flow.
Etc.. It's a very complicated mix of factors that determines if small or large batches of board could contain errors at all or not.
But it may at least be called "bizarre" that these solder errors are found in tens of thousands 2011 MBPs, but also in 2012 models, and in the PS4 and also other brand Windows PCs!!
If you want to test your GPU hard, download GpuTest OSX x64 0.7.0 from ( geeks3d . com / gputest ) and run the FurMark based stress test on HD resolution for 30-60 mins straight, then turn your machine off completely for 15-30 mins (until it's really cold, put it down on some cold stone floor might help), then repeat several times.
If the same problem would be hidden in there as in the 2011 models, this is the way to get it triggered soon.
If you ask me, this might be the first report of the same problem in the 2013 series.....
Question; do you game a lot? If you answer yes, then it would pretty much make a connection to this similar problem I think!
I'm curious about the results of the stress test!

GeForce 8800 with GeForce 7300

I'm looking for some advice... I am planning on purchasing a 30in LCD (Samsung 305T) and I'm wondering if I should upgrade my current GPU (GeForce 7300) to the GeForce 8800. Or if the 7300 is capable of driving the 30in monitor.
My next question is whether or not I can re-utilize my existing GeForce 7300 GPU's with the 8800. If the 8800 is that much better than the 7300 I would like install the 8800 and connect the new 30in monitor to it. Then connect my existing 2 x 24" LCD's to the 7300 GPU's (one each, I have 2 x 7300).
Will this be possible?
Most of my time on the system is spend using standard desktop application like MS Office (70%). The rest of the time I spend in Aperture and Final Cut.
Thanks in advance...

I don't see the 7300GT on Apple Store, but Nvidia specifies:
Dual-link DVI capability to drive the industry's largest and highest resolution digital flat panel displays up to 2560x16001
So if you plan on only using a single 30", you are fine, but if you feel you need an upgrade graphics, the Radeon 2600XT would be my first choice actually. People are generally happy as a replacement for 7300 or even x1900. The first revisions had a noisy fan, but so too would the 8800GT. Two dual link DVI ports
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB198Z/A
Someone last night said their 7300 and 8800 'don't get along' and having trouble, though it seems it should but make sure you get the right card.
And there is the Radeon 3870.
http://www.barefeats.com/harper16.html
http://www.barefeats.com/harper15.html
Even the 2600 can be used if you have Leopard.
Comparing 2600 to 8800.
http://www.barefeats.com/harper8.html

Right core temperature is...?

Hi everyone. I recently have format my t61 and face a clearly heating problem. Both core temperatures, 1 & 2, when i was doing the well known download-update-installations required in a fresh SO, reach 90 'c. Add to that the absolutely silence of the fans assure me that something was idle done. Thinking that it was due to an update not yet completeted issue, i end up with my updates and finally heard the sound of the fans. Though, it keeped reaching 90 C and it disturb me. Finally i hit with the TPfancontrol tool and im able to turn on the fans manually. But now that i have the control dont know where to stablish the "normal temperature" so to the fans turn on when that temperature threshold is reached (i dont think that 90 will be normal right?) So, can you help me with that piece of information?, whats the ideal temperature of the cores? I've just read 2 opinions: 60-70, and 60-80. Thanks in advance
Add to that is it normal that the core temperatures change in 1 seconds from, lets say 80-75?.
regards

The first thing I'd do is to remove the fan and clean out the dust then apply some Arctic Silver thermal paste to your CPU and GPU chips. When done, you should see the fans come on at 60-65c and you'll only see temps in the 70s when you have moderate to heavy cpu use. Temps in the 80s will be rare, only in extreme usage and it should never get to 90c degrees. The fast temp change indicates poor contact between cpu and heatsink, so I'd definitely not use it until you get it cleaned out. You'll probably find the therma paste has tried out and if your laptop was jarred or bumped hard it could dislodge the heatsink and you'll no longer have good contact.
ThinkPad W-510 i7-820QM(1.73-3.06GHz) Quad Core... ThinkPad T500, T9900, 8gb SSD...FrankNpad T-60p/61p (X9000 2.8ghz) 8gb SSD ips FlexView...ThinkPad T-61p (T9300 2.5ghz) 8gb ram...Thinkpad X-61 Tablet 4gb ram...ThinkPad A-31 (1.9ghz P4 1.5gb ram)

MPB temperature questions...

just 2 quick questions. Ive searched the forums a bit, and while Ive found hints, i cant quite answer my own question.
First, my macbook pro 2.6ghz (Merom proc) can run as hot as 165-170 degrees Fahrenheit while surfing the web/streaming videos. This seems a bit hot to me... I realize these computers tend to run pretty warm, and as i slow down net usage and the computer idles more, the temp drops as low as 120 F, but usually hovers (with casual use) between 140-150 F. I've heard of some macbook pros running much MUCH cooler, as low as 100 F. These might be older models though, with considerably slower processors.
Second, how does apple handle heat-related issues? Ive heard of people replacing the thermal paste (I'm VERY reluctant to do this myself)... is this the sort of thing apple maintenance would do? Or will they just send me on my way and tell me its normal.
I don't use my laptop ON my lap ever, but i worry about the machine overheating, and the kind of damage this can do to the processor or the internal circuitry... at what temp should i REALLY begin to worry that my processor is pushing it too far...
Thanks
Chris

Chris Bedrosian wrote:
I've heard of some macbook pros running much MUCH cooler, as low as 100 F. These might be older models though, with considerably slower processors...
Ive heard of people replacing the thermal paste (I'm VERY reluctant to do this myself)...
Actually, the older MacBook Pros ran hotter - which was when people got really exercised about replacing thermal paste and the like. My first MacBook Pro, which was the first generation ran substantially hotter than my current beast. The first generation was Core Duo rather than Core 2 Duo - hence the temperature problems. When they made the transition to Core 2 Duo the angst about temperatures kind of died down.
As for MacBook Pros running at 100F - I'd be amazed. Desktop processors might, but that is not the way these things are designed to work. Maybe that reading is an external case reading rather than a core reading. But marginally above room temperature would be remarkable for a laptop processor. With the first generation people were happy to get their core temperatures down to 60C ~ 140F. I'd consider that bog standard for my current MBP - a 2.4GHz Santa Rosa (forget what name people give to the processor because I don't care about Meroms, Penryns, Flagelates, Bornswindles or Fliggelhoofers - just that it works.) When you tax the processor it should jump to about 80C ~ 175F. Some websites can do that because they need all those ads to run smooth animation endlessly.
You should worry if you burn yourself or the computer doesn't function properly - otherwise trust that Apple hires thermal engineers that are competent at their jobs and forget about it.

Unexpected shutdowns / high GPU diode temperatures / new RAM?

Hi there, all. First time posting on the discussion forum.
My problem started earlier. I ordered some additional RAM for the new World of Warcraft expansion and put it in today. Here's the RAM in question, from the place I got it from:
http://www.crucial.com/store/partspecs.aspx?imodule=CT25664AC667
I used their locator tool, input my computer (24" iMac, 2.33ghz, late 2007), and that's what it gave me. Just to be safe I cross-checked it with the RAM specs necessary that I found here:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1423
As far as I could tell, this all checked out. I ordered the RAM and installed it today with little effort. I did notice that the levers for popping out/securing the RAM were a little hard to move. It seemed like they were an awfully tight fit, and sometimes were touching the sodimms as they moved in and out. Nevertheless everything fit in and clicked. I removed one of the 1gb sodimms I had by default and installed my new 2gb sodimm, for a total of 3gb.
After that I rebooted and checked system profiler. It registered 3gb of memory and said both modules were working OK. I checked iStat Pro and it also showed 3gb of memory. I noticed a pretty substantial performance increase in WoW, which is what I was looking for, so I assumed everything was fine. I played WoW all day, from about 12:00 noon to midnight off and on. No problems.
Around midnight, my computer shut down. No warning at all. I thought it was a power outage of some kind; either a cord was loose, my power strip was out, etc. That's how sudden and weird it was. I checked my cords, unplugged the power, plugged it back in, and rebooted.
About 5 minutes later, it happened again. I repeated this 3-4 times. Each time I booted up, checked to make sure the RAM was working properly, fired up WoW, and it would crap out very shortly afterward.
After a few repeats of this I started looking at my temperatures in iStat Pro. I noticed that the GPU Diode was significantly higher than the others - in the 170 degrees Fahrenheit / 70 degrees Celsius range. I watched them closely as I rebooted, and I figured out that as soon as the GPU Diode temperature got into the 170f/70c range my computer would die instantly.
Did some research on these forums and elsewhere, and discovered reports of a pretty widespread issue of GPUs overheating on the Intel iMacs, with an identical response: instant shutdown at a critical temperature.
The computer geek in me says that this is a problem with the RAM. However, system profiler and iStat Pro all say the RAM is functioning properly. And if the problem does have to do with the GPU, as the temperatures seem to indicate, is that connected to the RAM?
Anyway. I unplugged my system and reseated the RAM just to be sure everything was fitted properly. I think that one of the sodimms may have been loose. I made double sure everything clicked into place this time, and as of this writing WoW has been running for 35 minutes with no hitches. The GPU Diode temperature went as high as 190f/90c, but my computer didn't shut down. Now the GPU Diode has calmed down to a more reasonable 160f/70c, and it's hovering there.
Anybody have any input? The problem has gone away for the moment, but my temperatures are still pretty high and I'm a little nervous. Should I take it in to the Apple store? I have Applecare, so it certainly wouldn't hurt.

Hi arco311
It does sound like you may have dislodged the remaining 1GB module or not fully seated the new 2GB module. If you have any more issues that seem to be ram related, reinstall the ram pushing real hard on each of the modules with both thumbs and then close the ejector clips.
There are three fans in the Intel iMac (CPU/GPU, HD and Optical Drive) and you may want to experiment with smcFanControl 2.1.3. Then run up only the CPU/GPU fan speed a couple hundred RPM to see if that helps to keep the GPU down in the 160 to 170 range.
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/23049
Dennis

I am running Photoshop CC 2014 on Windows 8.1 with an AMD quad core processor and AMD E1-2100 APU with AMD Radeon HD 8210 Graphics Card. I have installed the latest driver version 13.152.0.0. When I activate puppet warp, the mesh appears over the image an

I am running Photoshop CC 2014 on Windows 8.1 with an AMD quad core processor and AMD E1-2100 APU with AMD Radeon HD 8210 Graphics Card. I have installed the latest driver version 13.152.0.0. When I activate puppet warp, the mesh appears over the image and I can place the first pin. However, when I go to add the second pin, Photoshop crashes. I have tried with on a new, blank file, with just a few lines on it, but, as soon as I place the first pin, the image disappears, and then, as soon as I click anywhere else in the image, Photoshop crashes. I have followed all the online advice about settings under the Preferences/Performance interface, but nothing fixes the problem. Can anyone please help?

BOILERPLATE TEXT:
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand, such as your platform (Mac or Win), exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop and of Bridge, machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, video card specs, what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far, what error message(s) you receive, if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them, etc., someone may be able to help you.
A screen shot could be very helpful too.
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

4GB memory on new MacBook Pro Retina 13 with 2.4GHz dual core i5 processor &128GB flash storage

Hello,
I'm completely new to the mac world but I'm fed up with pc's and all the insanity with processor problems, viruses, etc. I'm seriously looking at replacing my HP laptop with the new MacBook Pro Retina 13 with 2.4GHz dual core i5 processor, 4GB memory (RAM) & 128GB flash storage, OS X Mavericks (not sure which version). My concern is whether this will be reliably & consistantly fast & smooth both in desktop apps & internet use. I don't need it to do somersaults or anything too advanced. I would mostly be using Pages & spreadsheet apps & internet. It would double as my daughter's computer for cyber school so it's crucial that it runs quickly & efficiently. If she can't complete everything on time or log in to her online sessions because of a computer issue we'll be up a creek without a paddle since this particular cyber school's tech department is still working off of pc's running Windows XP. My father, thus far a pc user, thought I should consider moving up to 8GB memory but I was hoping that with flash storage being faster, I would be able to avoid the extra $100 for the upgrade to 8GB. My biggest fear is finding myself as frustrated & angry as I am now with all of my pc's, ready to take a sledge hammer to them because they take forever to boot, launch apps, internet or do just about anything (that is if they're even fuctioning at all- not joking). Does anyone have any advice or input? Thanks!!
P.s. On Apple's site I found a refurbished late 2013 model of the MacBook Pro Retina 13 with all of the same specs as listed above (4GB, not 8GB), running OS X (doesn't say which one) but for a bit less than a brand new one. Is this the same model as what they're currently selling new in their store or did they just upgrade everything to match what is being offered in the current "new" model? I realize this may be a dumb question but I can't seem to find anything online indicated that Apple has released a model newer than what was released late last year (October 2013, I believe), except that the model released then came with SSD storage instead of flash.

No computer is fault free but Apple MBPs have a good track record. In those cases where problems do arise, Apple has the best support in the industry.
A MBP with 4 GB RAM with the SSD storage should be adequate for your needs.
lsmoondancer01 wrote:
P.s. On Apple's site I found a refurbished late 2013 model of the MacBook Pro Retina 13 with all of the same specs as listed above (4GB, not 8GB), running OS X (doesn't say which one) but for a bit less than a brand new one. Is this the same model as what they're currently selling new in their store or did they just upgrade everything to match what is being offered in the current "new" model?
The latest MBP models came out in October 2013, so it will be the same, with the same warranty and telephone support. The difference will be that the price will be less and it will be delivered in a plain white box.
I have purchased three MBPs from the refurbished section. I have never been able to detect any cosmetic differences and will go that route again.
Ciao.

My Macbook Pro with 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo (Mac OS X v10.4 Tiger) can convert to Lion?

my Macbook Pro with 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo (Mac OS X v10.4 Tiger) can convert to Lion?
Toyoo

These are some of the most common Questions (Q) and Answers (A) about Lion:
Q: What are the system requirements of the Lion upgrade?
A: Core2Duo, Core i3, i5, i7, and Xeon Intel CPUs with 2 GB of RAM in a Macintosh computer with 2 GB of RAM, and 4 GB (7 GB after installed) for downloading from the Mac App Store (Available in 10.6.6 and later). Unofficially, past upgrades have arbitrarily also required an additional 15% of the hard drive to be free for data.
Q: What applications are compatible with Lion?
A: http://roaringapps.com/apps:table provides a nice third party editable listing for people to include the compatible applications. Many of these compatibility entries came from before Lion's release. Please verify they are correct now that it has been released, and help edit it for more accurate data. Be sure to include any update version of Lion post release that you have found is or is not compatible with it, for the help of others who may be upgrading to Lion the first time. Additionally, as it was released, there is no Rosetta. This means any application that is stated to be PowerPC in the System Profiler, will not work with Lion, and needs a comparable application or upgrade to be compatible. The System Profiler is in Apple menu -> About This Mac -> More Info. Intel and Universal applications are on the whole supported, though may still need some tweaking before every feature is compatible.
Q: Are there any pitfalls to watch out for?
A: With all upgrades, backing up your data at least twice has been a given. Hardware can fail independently of downloads and upgrades, though may happen simultaneously. Software may be found to be incompatible that has not been tested with the new upgrade, or combination of other software that might be installed with the upgrade. It is also strongly recommended once your backup is complete, to shut down your computer, remove all but Apple wired keyboard and mouse (notebooks remove all input devices). Then once done, reboot, and go directly to the upgrade distribution system available. Third party system tools, modification, and "maintenance" applications should be verified as compatible, or removed until known to be compatible. Check with developers how to remove if it is essential to use Lion before those applications become compatible. Most "maintenance" tools that deal with system cache, prebinding, are not really maintenance tools. Ask on forum when are the appropriate times to use them before assuming they should be used for upgrades or otherwise.
Q: How can I get from 10.4 or 10.5 to 10.6.6?
A: Purchase a 10.6 retail installer from an Apple retail or third party reseller. It has a picture of a Snow Leopard on the DVD, and does not say Upgrade, Dropin, or OEM. Install it, and then install the 10.6.6 combo update from:
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1349
Q: Is it true that I can only get it from the Mac App Store?
A: Presently this truth is based on current documentation as of the writing of this article. It may change, but we can't speculate as to its change. It has a better chance of changing if users request something different at:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html
Q: What limitations might one encounter if it doesn't change?
A: First off the 7 GB space limitation on the hard disc after it is installed. Secondly, the size of the download file requires significant time, unless you have a high speed broadband connection. Times expected are below -
4 GB at:
5Mbps is 2 hours.
at 1 Mbps is 10 hours.
at 384 kbps is 27 hours.
at 56k kbps is 184 hours (nearly 8 days).
If you include the 10.6.6 combo update of 1.06 GB
add 29 minutes for 5 Mbps
145 minutes (2 and 25 minutes) for 1 Mbps
6 and a half hours for 384kbps
A 24 hour day and 15 hours (for a total of a minimum of 39 hours) for 56kbps
Remember the retail 10.6 currently does not include the App Store, and those upgrading from 10.5.8 or earlier will need to both buy the retail 10.6, and download the combo 10.6.6 update, not to mention ensure they have the correct processor and 2 GB of RAM. Finally once it is available, you'll have find out how long approximately it takes to install after the download is complete.
These times do not include installation time, which on a MacBook Pro 3,1 15" installing on a Firewire 800 Newertech Voyager with WD10ACS-322J80 drive, 10.6.7, took 1 hour and a half to complete the installation from double clicking the install command to the registration screen. These times may vary by connection speeds from a non-dedicated connection, or background application usage of the internet. Any applications running when the installation process begins might interfere with the installation itself, and they should be quit first.
The installer just before it starts has in its package contents an InstallESD.dmg file a DVD burnable image to install on additional computers in the home without downloading over again. So if you desire to reinstall without an extra internet download, extract that file, by selecting the installer in the dock, and control-clicking it, and revealing it in the Finder. Next Control-mouse click it, and select show package contents. Inside that folder is a Shared Support folder. That's where you find the DMG.
Q: If I purchased a Mac recently, can I get it cheaper?
A: Yes, visit http://www.apple.com/macosx/uptodate/ for details.
Q: When will Lion become available?
A: It became available July 20, 2011.
Q: Which Macs can run Lion?
A: Look at Apple menu -> About This Mac -> More Info, and see if you meet the Machine ID and RAM requires under the hardware. 2 GB is required for all These Machine IDs will run Lion:
Mac Mini 2,1 and later
MacBook 2,1 and later.
iMac 5,1 and later.
All MacBook Air.
MacBook Pro 2,1 and later
All MacPros.
The Macs with the Machine IDs below will not run Lion (x can be any number):
Mac Mini 1,x or PowerMac x,x
MacBook 1,x
MacBook Pro 1,x
iMac 4,x, 3,x, 2,x, 1,x
Authored by a brody

Core Center Question ?

hello guys,
i wanted to know about corecell feature and and core center i am using latest version now and my CPU fan is usually at 4440 RPM even with gaming but my system temperature increases from 43-47 usually when gaming ? is this ok and my CPU temperature is 51C because its Prescott and i cannot do anything about it ? i wanted to know does corecell protect our computer from electric shock, overheating without Core Center or it would not without core center becasue the first time after installing windows xp service pack 1 (clean installation) i hear loud noise usually the CPU fan is on full speed but as soon as i installed the latest version of Core Center it adjusts it automatically and quietly and should i change my CPU priority for Core Center as maximum does that do any thing and i wanted to know i have DDR 400 Mhz but in bios it says DDR 333 because i have 533 FSB CPU is that right ? well does that mean i wasted my money on this or does that mean an upgrade to FSB 800 will make that better.

well, your MSI P4 mobo is your friend, because it shuts the system down, when the CPU is about to overheat. and the function "spread spectrum" helps preventing all static issues. but you should disable it, when you overclock. at least its recommended that way in the manual.
your temps seem fine to me, and they look even better because you have a Prescott.
dont change any settings in corecenter. everything is just fine there. i think it reports the temps a little higher than they actually are, but thats just my two cents. but 4400RPM is really fast! my CPU fan isnt reported to be faster than 2800 at most. still enough for my CPU.
no dude, everything is fine with your system. DDR400 memory goes in sync with FSB800 CPUs, such as the northy c versions.

How to run Speedy 33 with labVIEW 8.5 core software, Please send procedure.

Dear Sir
Wish u Happy New year (2010). I need a technical support for Speedy33. We have purchased NI speedy 33 h/w setup on 5/11/2008 from Tridet Techlabs Pvt. Ltd. Now we have got new(virtual Instrumentation) lab. when we purchased NI speedy 33 we have got only installation guide with the h/w. we want to run speedy33 with core s/w(LabVIEW8.5.1). So we kindly request you send procedure for running & working with speedy 33 using core module.
Thanking you
S. Antony Jesudurai
Lecturer, ICE Dept,.
Dr. Mahalingam College of engineering & technology,
Pollachi.
TamilNadu
India.

Happy New Year to you as well Dr. Mahalingam!
This forum is a predominently user supported one, although National Instruments monitors it and supports questions when they can, but it isn't an "official" communications pathway to National Instruments. To assure a response I would suggest contacting your nearest National Instruments representative in India, they probably can get you the info you need.
That having been said, while I don't have the info, another user may be able to assist you. As this is the beginning of a long holiday weekend, with many people taking today off, if you haven't seen a reply by Monday the 4th post a simple query to this thread to pop it back up on the "new question" area. As new questions come in, the older ones scroll down, until they are on an previous page, where they tend to get missed.
Putnam
Certified LabVIEW Developer
Senior Test Engineer
Currently using LV 6.1-LabVIEW 2012, RT8.5
LabVIEW Champion

Is CS5 compatible with GeForce 7350GE graphics card?

Is CS5 compatible with GeForce 7350GE graphics card?

The question you're probably asking is if the 7350GE is compatible with MPE or CUDA... http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_gpus.html and http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/systemreqs/

MSI P35 Neo2-FR: CPU vs core temperature

Hi. I've switched to a P35 Neo2-FR from a P35 Neo-F. The Neo2 was so cheap I couldn't resist. The board is fantastic so far. Great features, overclocking and performance for the price. Thumbs up for MSI
I was quite familiarised with the P35 Neo-F and inmediately noticed something weird with the new mobo. It has to do with temperatures. I know that temperature measuring software is making just guesses and that looking at them is a bit of looking into the unknown. This is why I don't care too much about what these programs have to say about temperatures.
BUT the board's SmartFan feature looks at CPU temperature for throttling the CPU fan. Throttled fan = noise, and I do care about the noise, so I care now about reported CPU temperature.
Weird thing is that reported CPU temperature is wrong in the Neo2-FR I think. These are my current temperatures (18º C room temperature):
As you can see, CPU temperature is higher than any of the core's temperatures. The reported core temperatures are as accurate as these things can be, as there is consensus about them among the big dogs in temperature monitoring (SpeedFan, Everest and CoreTemp), and I remember quite well that in my old P35 Neo-F CPU temp was always lower than any of the cores ones. It is my understanding that this is how it should be (ie., cores are always hotter than whatever is reported as CPU temp), and with this board temperatures are always the other way.
I've searched the BB and found very little about this CPU temperature issue on the Neo2-FR, but I'm wondering if this beta update means it is a known issue. It includes, among others, this fix:
Quote
*Adjust CPU temperature(06FB).
BOSSKILLER says that this means it fixes wrong temperature reporting on Q6600 (which is the processor with 0x6FB CPUID), but now RealTemp says that my E6750's CPUID is also 0x6FB:
I don't dare to install a beta version of a BIOS, but does this mean that CPU temp reading is wrong in current BIOS version and that next BIOS version will fix it so CPU fan doesn't kick in noisy mode too early? Anyone with the flawed report processors installed this beta BIOS and can tell how are the new CPU temperature readings?
Thanks and regards

Quote from: darkangel230 on 02-May-08, 01:25:08
That beta bios you're talkin, i've had it "installed" on my board
Only thing it does it report CPU temp 10 degrees cooler than Cores.
That 10 degrees drop on CPU temperature made it into the final 1.9 version of the BIOS. See:
Should I contact MSI about this? Will they care?
Oh dear!

G550 with geforce g150m gpu core temperature question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for