Garnishment Remittance Rules

My company requires remittance rules for garnishments that allow the payments to be issued (through FI Payment Processing) on the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th of each month. Currently, when I review the configuration for Third Party Remittance Rules, our configuration is set up so that the, for example, our Remit on the 7th rule references:
H = End of Month - is the Transfer Interval
007 = 7 days - Number of Grace Period in Days
A = Calendar Days - is the Grace Period Type.
This is causing the payment to be issued the following month instead of the current month. We have tried changing the Transfer Interval to O = 4 times monthly (7, 14, 21, EOM) but that is causing the payment to the third party weekly instead of monthly.
Has anyone encountered this same issue and if so, how did you get the system to count 7 days (or 14, 21 or 28 days) from the BEGINNING of the month instead of the end of the month?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Anita Carlton

Hello Giselle,
The payments should be issued once a month on the date specified by the remittance rule which is entered onto IT0194. For example,
Garnishment 1:
IT0194 is created June 1st and is set up to remit on the 14th of the month.
Garnishment 2:
IT0194 is created June 1st and is set up to remit on the 21st of the month.
I should see a third party payment to the vendor for Garnishment 1 on June 14th and then again on July 14th and so on. Likewise, I should see a third party payment to the vendor for Garnishment 2 on June 21st and then again on July 21st and so on.
Currently, our configuration is issuing the first payment on July 14th instead of June 14th (Garn 1) and July 21st instead of June 21st (Garn 2) and this is incorrect.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you
Anita

Similar Messages

Remittance Rules Details - Payment Method Drop Down List

In reviewing Remittance Rule details for an HR payee, when I go to Payment method and click the drop down list are any of the listed payment methods SAP standard delivered?
I know Payment Method is configured under Financial accounting. Is there a way to tell which of the options in the drop down list is standard delivered as opposed to customized?
Thanks,

Hello,
Go to T-code FBZP and click on Payment methods in company code.
Then go to company code US01 and there you can see the standard delivered payment methods for USA.
Any payment methods other than standard assigned to your company code are customized.
Arti

Garnishment - Special Rule for Non-Exempt Amount

There is calculation scheme for each special rule for non-exempt amount. For example federal rule for support is 04. The calculation scheme for this rule has 2 lines with operation multiplication and subtraction; and operand F1 and DN. Can someone explain to me what each line means and the cumulative effect of both the lines?
Thanks for your help!!
BBC

Hi,
Line 1 = F1 * DN i.e. Field 1 from infotype (IT0195 field 1 for fed exempt as per table T5UGA config) is multiplied by Disposable Net (wage type /G00) and stores result in R1 (intermediate result field)
Line 2 = DN - R1 i.e. subtract intermediate result stored from line 1 in R1 field from Disposable Net (/G00 wage type) to output result as minimum limit defined for nonexempt amount.
You can verify same in UGARN CALC (Garnishment Calculations section) in schema.
Thanks,
Ameet

Third party remittance Error

Hi
While running the third party remittance program PC00_M99_URME - Evaluate remittance (New)
I am getting the error "No entry in table T51RK for key 00000" There is no remittance rule 00000 which I have defined. Nor this entry is present in the table. but I am getting the message
THere is one more messga e which I am getting "No entry in table 3 for key 90000001 20.06.2008"
This 90000001 entry is in the HR payee table but this entry is not linked to any of my vendor or wage types. when I delete this entry I still get this message.
Any clue ?? Is there a note ?

It sounds like you have the wage type tied to third-party remittance via table T512W, processing classes 73 and 78. Do you want this wage type to remit and it is generating an error or are you getting the error and do not intend to remit?

Various Queries from a new learner of SAP

Hello Gurus,
I have some queries. I am very new to SAP and just trying to explore different things. I would be grateful if I can get some help from the experts like you. These queries may sound silly but I really need to learn these things.
a. If you could provide me with some documents for configuration of US taxation.
b. Explanation about COBRA
c. what does it mean when someone says " I have maintained time evaluation schema TM04 for negative recording"?
d. steps for configuration of off-cycle payroll activities.
e.what does it mean when some one says "I have integrated with personnel administration using the reports RHINTE20, RHINTE30?
f. if you could provide me with some documents for ESS configuration.
g. steps for creating line layout of remuneration statement.
h. How can we maintain "date types for date monitoring, date specifications, infotypes for hire date, service dates and terminatin date"?
i. How can we configure time types, processing types and time wage type selection rules?
j. what are processing classes?
k. steps for configuring data entry profiles for CATS for employees entering time data into CATS
l. What are "remittance rule, order types, adjustment model for the disposable net?
j. How can be creat and assign forms to letter types in payroll?
k. What are inbound and outbund interfaces in Benefits?
l. what are vesting and investing in benefits?
m. how can we customize benefits and payroll integration?
I know these are too much questions for a single time; but I just got excited when I came to know about this website. This is the first time I am exploring this website. I didn't know I can learn from forums where there are so many experts to help you.
Thank you all in advance!
Linda

it's like a 400 level class.

Facing a problem to run the garnishment for third party remittances

Hi All,
When we try create a posting run using Progrm RPURMP00 for garnishment for third party remittances. We got an error messages as PERNO. ...... no link to payroll results.
Thanks,
-suresh

Did you carry out the following two activities?
1. The payroll run, the evaluation run and the store evaluation run must have been completed before you can remit anything.
2. Tables T51RL, T51RC, T51RH and T51RD must be maintained.

Thirdparty remittance for Garnishment

Hi Gurus,
Need your help on this. When a third party Posting is done for Garnishment. Can you let me know what is the format of Reference document number created by SAP in Posting run. It should be like this HRGRNXX3567 for Garnishment? We have a error on AP for reference document HR (SPACE) 3567.
Regards,
Fred

Hello Fred,
I am having the same problem that you described in your original post. What exactly did you do to resolve the problem.
regards,
mike

Third Part Remittance - Garnishment posting

Hi,
While doing the Third party posting for Garnishments, it works fine when the EE doesn't have a retro. But if the EE has a retro, it doesn't post. It gives a message saying its already evaluated in the prior pay period. Can someone tell me how to overcome this issue.
Thanks,
Swarna.

Hi Guys,
This is the problem in the coding of SAP Program itself. I have copied it to Z Program and have made the changes, it works properly now.
Have also notified SAP OSS .
Jay Gandhi

Third party remittance posting - FI payments

Hello experts,
I am facing a problem in 3PR posting for Garnishment data.
For few employees though the data has been paid by AP , Garnishment history report is showing the status as 'Posted to AP'.(correct status must be - 'Paid by AP')
From HR side i confirmed that the Garnishment data has been posted successfully.The end users confirmed that the vendor payment is done.
I could find out that in remittance table T51R5 there is a acknowledgement field (REMPN) which is confirmation sent by FI once the payment is run.But in this scenario the acknowledgement field is not getting updated.
Do you have any idea how payment is done in FI ( any program or utilility that is run ) and how the acknowledgement is passed to HR module?
Regards,
Malathi V.

Hello Experts,
I got the solution for the issue.
The payment program RFFOUS_T/ RFFOUS_C was not updating the payment acknowledgement number in T51R5 for 3PR Garnishments.
The SAP Note 1130975 contains the details about this problem.Application of this note must solve the problem.
Regards,
Malathi V.

Garnishment Vendor Advice Info Missing

Friends,
We have setup third party remittance for Garnishments and on Vendor check/Advice(F110) we are missing the employee information.
what we can see now is only "0003100070001510692340000689399900403" and "HRGRNX00031069".
Now in this "99900403" is employee code.
Instead of all this big information we need Employee Name / Garnishment Case Number on the Advice.
Configuration done :
a) T5UGI - Garnishment assigned to Letter Type 08/09 with UFG1.
b) Employee in P0194 has "Information on advice of vendor check" as Answer Letter Indicator.
Would appreciate the Help, let me know what i am missing.
aman

SPRO :-
Payroll: USA -> Garnishments -> Letters.
Assign forms to letter types (T5UGI) Type 08.
FI side:-
Copy of the FI advice form F110_US_AVIS to print the garnishment information. And Change section 625-HR of the form to add the text lines REGUD-TEXT1 through REGUD-TEXT9
Edited by: Aman Kumar on Aug 18, 2009 1:37 AM

Customised Garnishment Report missing few employees

Hey guys...
Am caught up with this issue. A customised Garnishment report that run every pay period (bi weekly) fails to pick up few employees. The processing has happened and the checks have been printed. But the employees do not appear on the report.
Moreover, the same employee is found against the same vendor account for a different period, but gets dropped of for another period.
Any thought son what I need to check?

Please check if employee is active now or garnishment is displayed in GRDOC/GRORD tables ....not sure may be because of some conditions imposed in custom interface to not display I guess.
Please check with developer on rules set in interface.
Thanks,
Ameet

Bank Statement Processing - FF_5 - FEBA - Posting Rules

Hi All SAP Experts !!!
I am a non SAP expert (I am a tehcnically minded accountant) trying to find out if I can find a SAP solution to my problem.
I am trying to introduce automatic processing / upload and posting of journals from electronic Bank statements from Citibank.
My particular problem is in the area of processing Cash/Customer receipts which can come from various
different external transaction types from my bank statement.
I have tested a solution whereby the e-bank statement is queried for Invoice numbers with some success but
my problem is the success depends on the accuracy and completeness of Invoice numbers provided by my cusomters.
The above solution when it works makes the following accouNting entries
Level 1 Dr Bank A/c Cr Suspense A/c (General Ledger)
Level 2 Dr Suspense A/c Cr A/R Subledger (Clearing the Customer Invoices)
Due to the lack of consistancy in results of testing I now wish to do something different
Query the same statement on the basis of Customer Name or Customer Bank Details (Bank Orig ID)
From this I would simply like to make the same level 1 posting as above but for the Level 2 posting I simply
want to leave the monies received unallocated on the subledger (ie FBO1 or Not clearing anything)
Is it possible to query the E-Bank statemnent on a name or Bank Originatiing ID and use same to map to a
Customer No within one of SAP's tables ie "Widget & Co" = Cust No 10001 in the AR subledger?
Can the above FB01 Level 2 type transaction be carried out just posting and not allocating/clearing?
Thanks a million
MJOAP40

In the definition of the level 2 posting rule, you have a couple of options. You can leave the posting rule type as a subledger clearing and specify a "Posting on acct key". With that SAP will attempt to clear, but if it can't it will use the posting key specified to post on account (FB01).
Another option is to change the posting rule posting type from clearing the subledger to posting to the subledger - in this case, SAP will not attempt to clear anything, but just post everything on account.
In either scenario, if the system does not have an invoice to clear, then you will probably need to use a search string to assign the customer number so the system knows what account to use for the on account posting. Search strings look at the remittance information on the bank statement (Note to Payee). You would need to create search strings specific to each customer. The search string would map the customer's remittance information to the customer's number in SAP. There are multiple posts in this forum and the ERP Financials - Treasury Applications forum regarding configuration of search strings.
Regards,
Shannon

Garnishment Statistics report

Hello All,
Can anyone explain how to execute Garnishment Statistics report . I would like to get the employees numbers with name who have an active Garnishment . when i execute it, i just get Personnel subarea with number of employees who have an active Garnishment. I would like to know, is there a way to get into detail of employee number and name? Appreciate your help.

The Garnishment Statistics Report is programmed not to give employee details, but rather Statistics.
Check in SAP's Menu, there is an other Garnishment Report that gives details on employees and their garnishments, including the history of remittances and current debt.
The big caveat is that there is probably strict security on that report as only a few persons should be able to see all that confidential information.

ACH file IL Child support Garnishment

Hi,
I working on to activate the Third party remittance (US Payroll) functionality for garnishment. Every thing is working fine, but I am not able to produce correct format ACH file for IL Child support.
Should be <705DEDCSCSIL02101507400.00>
coming out <705RMROIHR0004300121*400.00>
I will appreciate any input to the matter.
Regards,
Rizwan

hi! Did you resolve the issue? Wud appreciate if you could share it with us/me. I have a similar kinda problem.
Regards and thanks in advance,

Garnishment - Federal Student Loan

I have been asked to configure Student Loan Garnishment to deduct as below when there are more than one active Student Loan Garnishment per employee.
The 25% limit is for the combination of both. If one school loan is for 15% of disposable net and the second is also for 15% of disposable then it should be deducting 15% for the first and up 10% for the second loan for a total limit of 25% of disposable net.
Please help if anyone was able to configure special rule in SAP for this.

Hi Vaibhav,
You need to create 2 non-exempt models with 2 different rules and map it to FED Student loan under table V_T5UG4.
First rule say 001 for single Student loan should have Non-exempt model say /FE1 in table V_T5UG3-
Limit 1 section=>
Nonexempt of 15% of Net i.e. Indicator - 2, Value - 15.00 and Unit - 1 (Percent of Net).
Federal Minimum Wage section=>
Min Hours as 30
Hourly Wage as "blank"
Second rule say 002 for multiple Student loan should have Non-exempt model say /FE2 in table V_T5UG3-
Limit 1 section=>
Nonexempt of 25% of Net i.e. Indicator - 2, Value - 25.00 and Unit - 1 (Percent of Net).
Federal Minimum Wage section=>
Min Hours as 30
Hourly Wage as "blank"
You will need to input the respective rules 001 and 002 in IT0195 depending upon whether single or multiple FED student loan exists.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Ameet

Garnishment Remittance Rules

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for