Garnishment - Special Rule for Non-Exempt Amount

There is calculation scheme for each special rule for non-exempt amount. For example federal rule for support is 04. The calculation scheme for this rule has 2 lines with operation multiplication and subtraction; and operand F1 and DN. Can someone explain to me what each line means and the cumulative effect of both the lines?
Thanks for your help!!
BBC

Hi,
Line 1 = F1 * DN i.e. Field 1 from infotype (IT0195 field 1 for fed exempt as per table T5UGA config) is multiplied by Disposable Net (wage type /G00) and stores result in R1 (intermediate result field)
Line 2 = DN - R1 i.e. subtract intermediate result stored from line 1 in R1 field from Disposable Net (/G00 wage type) to output result as minimum limit defined for nonexempt amount.
You can verify same in UGARN CALC (Garnishment Calculations section) in schema.
Thanks,
Ameet

Similar Messages

Sql statement substituion - any special rules for formatting the query?

Hey,
I was wondering - are there any special rules for formatting the query that is to be substituted?
I am asking, as somehow I am unable to make the DSP substitute my query. I took the basesql from the server console (to make sure that I have the correct version), configured a query substitution, and well, nothing happens.
I've tried to substitute it with a modified version of the original query (where NVL(,0) is changed to NVL(,-9999)), then also with select * from dual (which I hope would generate some error), but DSP is ignoring everything...
The query is rather big (400 lines), so maybe I need to format it somehow? I've noticed that in the docs (http://edocs.bea.com/aldsp/docs25/admin/server.html#wp1049919) that the query used in the example has all leading spaces removed. I've tried that, but DSP is still not doing any substitution...
Any suggestions welcomed...
Thanks,
Leszek

Michael,
I am doing everything as in edocs, retrieving from logs the basesql (so with place holders). I've removed all new lines (so the query is now in a single line) and all excessive blanks (so all double/more blanks replaced with a single blank). Still the DSP is like ignoring the substitution. I've tried to do it even with a simple query, like:
SELECT t4."PRODUCT_ID" AS c1, t4."PRODUCT_NAME" AS c2 FROM {DB}.{SELECTION} t1 JOIN {DB}.{CUSTOMER_FACT} t2 ON (t1."VAL" = t2."CUSTOMER_ID") JOIN {DB}.{CUSTOMER} t3 ON (t3."CUSTOMER_ID" = t2."CUSTOMER_ID") JOIN {DB}.{PRODUCT} t4 ON (t4."PRODUCT_ID" = t3."PRODUCT_ID") WHERE ((? = t1."SESSN_ID") AND (t1."NAME" = 'CUSTOMER_ID') AND (t3."DELET_DATE" IS NULL) AND (t3."PRODUCT_TYPE" = 11))
am I missing something here? do I need to remove/add something , to make it work?
I've tried removing blanks around = signs (which from the DSP pov results in a different query), sitll with no results.
Edited by xnts at 06/24/2008 7:37 AM

Garnishment deduction amount greater than non exempt amount ??

Hi all,
Here is my doubt .
Say my garnishment deduction is 150$ and the minimum limit(non exempt ) to be deducted is only 100$ ,
What will happen when I run the payroll for the employee ?
Will he be errored out and written to the match code ?
Will the amount be written to DDNT or ARRS table or only 100 $ will be deducted and no error will be displayed.
Can anyone please tel me what are the possible outcomes ?
Thanks.

I got the answer on my own.

Settlemnent rule for Non-Billable WBS at Level 2 .

Hi Folks,
We have the Finance related WBS at Level 2 one is billable & other is non billable WBS . As per the recommendation of SAP , we are generating the automatic settlement rule for Billable WBS at level 2 & all the below WBS ( which are non-billable ) & account assigned as Do not settle. ( settlemnet rule 90) .
This issue is creating a issue to the non billable WBS at level 2 created wherein we are not able to settlement due to the strategy followed as Do not settle ( Rule 90 ) for the Account assigned WBS element.
Is there any way we can settle the costs posted to the non-billable level 2 WBS to the reciever ?
Your advice to this issue will be helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Ramu

You can settle the cost of Non-billable WBSE to billable WBSE. and then from billable WBSE settle the cost to other reciever. for this to happen, you have to delete the settlement rule "do not settle" in non-billabe WBSE and write a settlement rule which settles to billable WBSE.

Does Adobe provide special pricing for non-profit, religious or humanitarian organizations?

I would like to know if Adobe provides special pricing, discounts for non-profit, humanitarian or religious organizations?

Genesis Technologies is an Authorized Adobe Gold Reseller - and we work with Non-Profit Organizations. You can see our current non-profit catalog here - http://www.genesis-technologies.com/cart/Non_Profit/Adobe_Non_Profit_c93/
And yes, we do carry Adobe Creative Cloud at a discounted non-profit price

How to remove negative values for non-cumulative amount

Hello
I have a requirement from the user, wherein he needs to see the balance amount from credit and debit without calendar day being a factor. Hence, they do not need a bank passbook kind of scenario.
I kept the balance amount aggregation as sum+last value. It works fine when I keep calendar day in rows. However, removing it shows negative value in the balance amount in case of just debit.
They wish to see 30,000 on 07.12.2014 and 25,000 on 04.02.2015 in Non-cumulative key figure column. This works if I drag 0calday, but doesnt work in this scenario.
Is it possible?

Hi Yasemin
Credit & Debit are inflow and outflow amount key figures. The user want the data somewhat like this:-
GL Account No.
Credit
Debit
Non Cumulative Balance
1
1000
1000
1
500
500
1
100
400
However, as of now, I get this data only when I keep 0calday in rows. If I remove it the data turns into this:-
GL Account No.
Credit
Debit
Non Cumulative Balance
1
1000
1000
1
500
-500
1
100
-100
I also tried suppressing result rows, yet it didnt work. This scenario is sort of like an account passbook debit and credit amount balance report, but they want that amount coming in without the 0calday row.

Are there any special plans for Non-profits?

Part of a very small not profit that currently uses Photoshop and Premeire - would love to upgrade but, have to watch the expense. Thank you.

Not that I know about...
Cloud Plans https://creative.adobe.com/plans
-and subscription terms http://www.adobe.com/misc/subscription_terms.html

Garnishabl Amount - Non exempt and Disposable net

Hi all ,
Can any please explain me in detail or forward me suitable material where I can gain enough knowledge on
this Garnishable amount using the Disposable net and Non exempt amounts.
Can anyone explain me with an example how we do the config for Disposable amount and Non exempt amount.
Thanks.
Edited by: Daniel Ben on Feb 28, 2008 5:57 PM

Adjusting the disposable net is done with processing class 59.
The following are valid values:
'1' Transfer to disposable net with same sign
2' Transfer to disposable net with sign reversed
3' Completely non-exempt, used for non-exempt garnishment refund wage types
4' Used for garnishments, used for exempt garnishment refund wage types
Processing class 60 determines whether the garnishment wage type should be saved in the results table.
The disposable net is the basis of calculation for garnishable amounts.
Disposable net is determined by values 1' and 2'.
If you need to create your own model to adjust disposable net, check the value of processing class 59 after copying your wage type(s) and adjust the value accordingly.
An Adjustment Model determines how the disposable net is to be adjusted to fit your company's requirements.
Within the Non-Exempt Amount section, you can define the different ways of determining the garnishable amount and how it is calculated .
The garnishable amount can be determine using the following:
Levy - You can indicate the exempt amount for a levy for each levy form. This is done by indicating for each form the number of filing status, exemptions, pay period, validity dates and the exempt amount.
Special Rules - Special rules for determining the garnishable amount can be stored. A special rule is used in cases where a model is not able to be used.
Federal Minimum Wage - You can indicate the minimum wage rate that is used in determining the garnishable amount in accordance with the Federal Minimum Wage.
The Model Non-Exempt is used to determine the garnishable amount. Here you can specify whether the minimum is exempt or non-exempt, a percentage or an amount, the federal minimum wage, and a Levy Form or Special Rule, if it applies.
Once a Model Non-Exempt is created, it is then attached to the Rule Non-Exempt to calculate the garnishable amount.

FM for updatting multiple calendar special rules.

Hello
i have requirement to create special rules for Factory multiple Calendar's.
could you please provide any FM or BAPI that can be used to update the special rules.
i found one FM FACTORYCAL_WRITE_DOCUMENT, but here we can update only one Calendar at once.
i tried to update form the BDC using transaction SCAL, here the issues is that to update multiple calendars we have to do from the begining for each calendar.
thanks for your feed back on this.

Hi,
naidu c wrote:
> i found one FM FACTORYCAL_WRITE_DOCUMENT, but here we can update only one Calendar at once.
>
> i tried to update form the BDC using transaction SCAL, here the issues is that to update multiple calendars we have to do from the begining for each calendar.
What is the issue with calling the FM or executing the BDC, several times?
Sandra

Forms central for non for profit organization

Hi Community,
as non payed volunteers - working for a non for profit organization - do we urgently need Adobe FormsCentral.
How could we buy this program not to much expensive.
thanks a lot for your assistance

Hi;
FormsCentral does not have any special pricing for non-profit or other groups.
Thanks,
Josh

Special Rule

Hello
How do i do?
For non exempt and professional exempt employees . Payment made for number of hours worked from 10pm to 6am.
NSN

Its seems related to Time Management.. Create a DWS, PWS, and WSR as per 10:00 to 6:00. In this u shld make seperate Emp Sub Group groupings.... for Non exemp and professional exempt

Factory calender special rules

Hi MM consultants,
We have one issue related to Factory calender.
We updated the special rules in factory caleder stating that palnt is clsoed for some time in christmas.
Now the issue is after creating schedulign agreement delivery schedule release were sent to vendor mentioning that delivery is required during holidays and caused confusion.
My question is which table i can see the special rule created to the factory calneder so that i can confirm the releases were created before the calender updation.
please reply
Thanks in advance
Yashwanth

Hi Yashwanth,
You can check the factory calendar and the special rules on SPRO > SAP NetWeaver > General Settings > Maintain Calendar.
There, select "Factory Calendar" and click on "display" button.
In the next screen, select your country and click on the "Calendar" button that is in the top of the screen.
In the next screen, make double click on the year 2012.
There you will see the Public Holidays of the Factory Calendar.
Now, yo check the special rules, go back to the screen that is showing the countries and make double click on the country selected.
In the next screen, click on the "Special rules" button and you will see the special rules for the country selected.
But, for the case of MM, the system is only sending a warning message when you are selecting a Public Holiday or Special Day in the delivery date. The message is as follow:
Delivery date: next workday is 10.04.2012
Message no. ME080
Diagnosis
The system has determined the next workday from the factory calendar that is assigned to the specified plant.
If you don't want that the Public holidays or Special days can be selected, you need to change this message as error message.
You can do this on SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Environment Data > Define Attributes of System Messages > System messages.
I hope this help.
Kind regards,
Sandra

Typing rules for assigning non-wildcards to wildcards

Hi all,
I have the following code:
public class A<T extends Number> {
     T t;
     public void foo() {
          Number number = null;
          Integer integer = null;
          A<? extends Integer> a1 = null;
          A<? super Integer> a2 = null;
          a1.t = null; // OK
          a1.t = integer; // Error
          a2.t = number; // Error
          a2.t = integer; // OK
}The code contains four assignments of a non-wildcard type to a wildcard type. Two of them are correct, two are wrong. Now, intuitively, the following rules seem to hold for such assignments to upper/lower bounded wildcards:
- Only the null-type can be assigned to an upper bounded (or unbounded) wildcard.
- A non-wildcard type can be assigned to a lower bounded wildcard iff it can be assigned to the wildcard's lower bound.
I think that the rules are quite intuitive but I would be interested in finding the formal typing rules for such assignments in the JLS. Can anyone provide a reference into the
JLS which which cover the semantics of the above assignments?
Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks a lot in advance!

kablair & dannyyates,
first of all, thanks a lot for taking you the time to explain the things to me that clearly! Sorry also for the somewhat confusing example by having chosen the final class Integer which is some kind of a special and limiting case.
In any case, I have gone through the JLS yesterday as I was particularly interested in the role of capture conversion to formally explain the correctness of the above code and here are my conclusions I want to share with you: Actually, there seem to be no subtyping rules for wildcards because you always apply capture conversion (JLS3 5.1.10) to wildcards before looking for their subtype relationship to other types. Capture conversion converts each wildcard to a new fresh synthetic type variable which has appropriate upper bounds and also a lower bound. Now, in the very last sentence of section 4.10.2 of the JLS3, it is stated that a type variable is a direct supertype of its lower bound which I think is the key point. This means that you can assign something to a type variable iff you can assign it to its lower bound.
Now, capture conversion converts every unbounded or lower bounded wildcard into a type variable which has the null type as its lower bound. This formally shows that you can really just assign null to them as in the code above. Contrary, every lower bounded wildcard is capture converted to a type variable whose lower bound is the lower bound of the wildcard. So, again, you can assign it every type you can assign to that lower bound. This is also reflected in the above code.
So, that's maybe the formal explanation for something which is intuitively clear anyway...

What are the special conversions for time in update rules?

What are the special conversions for time in update rules?

Hello,
Special conversions for time in update rules are automatically conversion rules.
Example: If the cube contains calendar month and your transfer structure contains date, the date to month is converted automatically.
Assign points if this helps,
Regards,
Jorge Diogo

How is exempt amount calculated for involuntary deductions?

How is the exempt amount calculated for involuntary deductions?
For child support CHILD_SUPP_CALCULATION_FORMULA fast formula can be used for getting the exempt amount?
What about other involuntary deductions like alimony, creditor debt, bankruptcy?
Can anyone please guide me to any documents concerning this.
Regards,
Manish.

When you define the deduction using the Deduction template, the formula are automatically get defined.
Ex in your case Creditor debt is an involuntary deduction and it should be paid using the third party payment, the priority of this deduction will be 1 and you also might need to define external organization to pay this amount.
You can refer the payroll user guide which might provide you few details of the involuntary deduction

Garnishment - Special Rule for Non-Exempt Amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for