Thirdparty remittance for Garnishment

Hi Gurus,
Need your help on this. When a third party Posting is done for Garnishment. Can you let me know what is the format of Reference document number created by SAP in Posting run. It should be like this HRGRNXX3567 for Garnishment? We have a error on AP for reference document HR (SPACE) 3567.
Regards,
Fred

Hello Fred,
I am having the same problem that you described in your original post. What exactly did you do to resolve the problem.
regards,
mike

Similar Messages

Implementing ACH Payments for Garnishment Child Support in US Payroll

Hi Experts,
My client wants to implement ACH Payments for Garnishment Child Support in US Payroll instead of mailing live Checks.
Can you please provide me with the Standard config settings/SAP documentation needed to achieve this functionality.
I also need a questionaire to gather the Business Requirements.
Regards,
Somdeb.
Edited by: Somdeb Banerjee on Oct 1, 2010 12:09 AM

Hi Experts,
I have a few queries at this juncture:
1) For example, let's say there is vendor (say 108001 )and there are three employees whose Support Garnishments are going to this vendor.
Now If u201CIssue Separate Check to Vendor u201Cfield is checked in IT0194, does this ensure separate line items/entries for each employee in the ACH file format.
2) Can we assign only Vendor (say 108001 ) everytime in IT0194 for any employee with Garnishment Category u2013 Support.
3) Can a Vendor ask for the same ACH file in both the formats - CTX and CCD ? If yes, does that mean there will be two payment runs in FI, one for each format.
Can you please help.
Regards,
Somdeb.

Remittance for check to vendor with multiple invoices paid

SBO 2007A, PL15
If I print a vendor check to pay 10 or more invoices, the remittance portion prints 9 invoices on the stub and then prints the remainder of the invoices on the next check in the check run. How can I make the stub stop at 9?
Edited by: Rui Pereira on Jan 27, 2009 3:30 PM

Hi ,
It looks like print setup .
1.Go to administration >> System intialisation >> Print preference >> Documents >>Checks for payment
>> Overflow to Blank paper
2. It could be application error .
Suggestion :(Not necessary)
Please upgrade your patch level . You are in patch 15 and right now I believe is 45
Thank you
Bishal

How is the disposable net calculated for garnishment?

Hi experts,
In IMG, I tried to create new adjustment model for diposable net.
But I found out some entries are there trying to substract the
amount paid for other garnishment (such as child support).
So suppose I have two garnishments, one is Child support, another
is creditor. While when I was doing test I found out even the
wage type for the Child support wage type is put in the model as
deduction to calculate the creditor garnishment, it is actually
not substracted during payroll process.
Could anyone tell me how should this work?
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Johnson

Thank you Aniket. Just got time to test this.
In my test, the 'take home pay' is not deducted to zero or negative even both garnishments are fully deducted. The child support garnishment wage type is still not included in calculating creditor's disposable net. I checked processing class 59 for the child support garnishment wage type and it is set to 4. Everything looks ok, what could be the problem here?
Thank you and have a wonderful holiday.

Facing a problem to run the garnishment for third party remittances

Hi All,
When we try create a posting run using Progrm RPURMP00 for garnishment for third party remittances. We got an error messages as PERNO. ...... no link to payroll results.
Thanks,
-suresh

Did you carry out the following two activities?
1. The payroll run, the evaluation run and the store evaluation run must have been completed before you can remit anything.
2. Tables T51RL, T51RC, T51RH and T51RD must be maintained.

Garnishment Remittance Rules

My company requires remittance rules for garnishments that allow the payments to be issued (through FI Payment Processing) on the 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th of each month. Currently, when I review the configuration for Third Party Remittance Rules, our configuration is set up so that the, for example, our Remit on the 7th rule references:
H = End of Month - is the Transfer Interval
007 = 7 days - Number of Grace Period in Days
A = Calendar Days - is the Grace Period Type.
This is causing the payment to be issued the following month instead of the current month. We have tried changing the Transfer Interval to O = 4 times monthly (7, 14, 21, EOM) but that is causing the payment to the third party weekly instead of monthly.
Has anyone encountered this same issue and if so, how did you get the system to count 7 days (or 14, 21 or 28 days) from the BEGINNING of the month instead of the end of the month?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Anita Carlton

Hello Giselle,
The payments should be issued once a month on the date specified by the remittance rule which is entered onto IT0194. For example,
Garnishment 1:
IT0194 is created June 1st and is set up to remit on the 14th of the month.
Garnishment 2:
IT0194 is created June 1st and is set up to remit on the 21st of the month.
I should see a third party payment to the vendor for Garnishment 1 on June 14th and then again on July 14th and so on. Likewise, I should see a third party payment to the vendor for Garnishment 2 on June 21st and then again on July 21st and so on.
Currently, our configuration is issuing the first payment on July 14th instead of June 14th (Garn 1) and July 21st instead of June 21st (Garn 2) and this is incorrect.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you
Anita

Field details for remittance.

hi All,
I need some additional information such
PAYERBANKACCNAME
PAYERBANKACCTYPE
PAYEEBANKACCNAME
PAYEEBANKACCTYPE
Presently i am fetching necessary bank detials from Reguh table.
Can any body provide me the idea as to which table i need to fetch this enteries
What is the name of the data element for these fields.
I am creating the remittance for the invoice whihc i have created and pull those remittance through the reports.
thanks,

Has anybody tried to bring the 3rd party remittance amount to display in the amount remitted field in Tax Form? Please let me know. I am working on a similar requirement

Third party remittance posting - FI payments

Hello experts,
I am facing a problem in 3PR posting for Garnishment data.
For few employees though the data has been paid by AP , Garnishment history report is showing the status as 'Posted to AP'.(correct status must be - 'Paid by AP')
From HR side i confirmed that the Garnishment data has been posted successfully.The end users confirmed that the vendor payment is done.
I could find out that in remittance table T51R5 there is a acknowledgement field (REMPN) which is confirmation sent by FI once the payment is run.But in this scenario the acknowledgement field is not getting updated.
Do you have any idea how payment is done in FI ( any program or utilility that is run ) and how the acknowledgement is passed to HR module?
Regards,
Malathi V.

Hello Experts,
I got the solution for the issue.
The payment program RFFOUS_T/ RFFOUS_C was not updating the payment acknowledgement number in T51R5 for 3PR Garnishments.
The SAP Note 1130975 contains the details about this problem.Application of this note must solve the problem.
Regards,
Malathi V.

Garnishment Vendor Advice Info Missing

Friends,
We have setup third party remittance for Garnishments and on Vendor check/Advice(F110) we are missing the employee information.
what we can see now is only "0003100070001510692340000689399900403" and "HRGRNX00031069".
Now in this "99900403" is employee code.
Instead of all this big information we need Employee Name / Garnishment Case Number on the Advice.
Configuration done :
a) T5UGI - Garnishment assigned to Letter Type 08/09 with UFG1.
b) Employee in P0194 has "Information on advice of vendor check" as Answer Letter Indicator.
Would appreciate the Help, let me know what i am missing.
aman

SPRO :-
Payroll: USA -> Garnishments -> Letters.
Assign forms to letter types (T5UGI) Type 08.
FI side:-
Copy of the FI advice form F110_US_AVIS to print the garnishment information. And Change section 625-HR of the form to add the text lines REGUD-TEXT1 through REGUD-TEXT9
Edited by: Aman Kumar on Aug 18, 2009 1:37 AM

ACH file IL Child support Garnishment

Hi,
I working on to activate the Third party remittance (US Payroll) functionality for garnishment. Every thing is working fine, but I am not able to produce correct format ACH file for IL Child support.
Should be <705DEDCSCSIL02101507400.00>
coming out <705RMROIHR0004300121*400.00>
I will appreciate any input to the matter.
Regards,
Rizwan

hi! Did you resolve the issue? Wud appreciate if you could share it with us/me. I have a similar kinda problem.
Regards and thanks in advance,

Garnishment_Third party remittance

Hi guys,
Hope you all doing fine.
I am working third party remittance. I think SAP reads HR payee for third party from IT0194. So is there any special config that we need to maintain to post garnishment to third party.
Please let me know.
Mayuresh

Hi,
Arun: Thanks but I already have this document.
Saquib: I have already configured the payment program.
When I try to run PC00_M99_URME - Evaluate remittance (New) in ECC 6.0 I get message saying that No documents created. I am running this for person with Garnishment and I am selecting proper pay period and 4 as HR payee type.
Do i need to create number range and accumulators for garnishment?
Can you guys please help?
Mayuresh

Third Party Remittance Process

Hi All,
Wage type '/484' is a technical wage type used for one of the taxes in the US. Our client just started using this tax type for a new tax for the state of New York. SAP has the tax wage types set to post in third-party remittance by default, even though we do not use third-party remittance for taxes (we only use third-party remittance for garnishments).
To avoid using Third Party Remittance I have changed the processing class 78 value for '/484' from u201C2u201D to BLANK. So that this will stop it from being included in the third-party remittance process.
Actually, I have not worked much on this Remittance process. I have made changes in Development system but have not transported them to quality.
But, I want to know how would i test it. I need to test in two scenario's:
1. Testing in quality so that i can see remittance happening (When Processing Class '78' value is '2').
2. Testing again in quality how remittance is getting stopped for Wage Type '/484' (When Processing Class '78' value is '0').
So, basically I want to know how we can check (verify) for remittance happening in the system for a particular Wage Type.
Regards,
Avinash

transaction: PC00_M10_U500
This transaction runs the payroll driver (the same one that we run payroll with, program RPCALCU0). It defaults to the schema u201CU500u201D. Use this standard schema if no custom specific modifications are done.
The testing for this is to run the third-party remittance process and verify that the error no longer occurs for an employee with wage type /484.

Third party remittance issue - no documents created

hi All,
When I am excuting Third party remittance for an employee I am getting status as: Evaluated! no documents created. When I checked in PCP0, the document is created. After checking the status in PCP0 I am executing 3rd party payroll and below log is displayed:
Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
Status Evaluated ! No documents created
Personnel number selected: 1
Personnel number evaluated 1
personnel number rejected 0
personnel number skipped 0
Number of errors 0
No of warnings 0
Can an one please help me on this issue.
Thanks,
Sai

hi Michael,
The employee payroll has been successful. Post payroll execution we have done FI Posting and document has been created for the posting which we have checked through PCP0.
Can you please help on this issue.
Thanks,
Sai

Garnishment payments in AP - please help

Dear experts
I'm SAP Accounts Payable person. My client is implementing SAP AP as well as HCM. We had a discussion between two teams regarding how we wanted to handle the garnishment payments. In their current world, they run any type of payments via AP.. So they wanted to push a file from HCM to AP for all garnishment payments. They deduct part from the employee's check they wanted to create payes will be created as vendors in SAP AP and then will push a file from HCM to AP to run the payment run. HCM is saying that they can not run the payments in HCM. It has to be like run via AP. But, I'm not convinced that if they are running the payroll in HCM and garnishment payments are part of payroll process and why they have to created vendors and run the payment run in AP???
Can some one please explain this how it should be processing? I feel that this is not an ideal design...
Can the HCM completely handle the whol garnishment payments without hitting AP along with payroll run??
Please help..

No special config required from AP. The vendor record in AP will be referred in payroll run. It will replicate to AP then AP will run payment run for garnishment payment using rffous_T
Thanks,
Sri

Automatic e-mail of remittance advice to vendors following the Payment Run

Hi,
We are implementing the Automatic e-mail of remittance advice to vendors following the Payment Run(F110) for one of our company code located at UK.
But we have already implemented this process for one of the company code located in US using the Business transaction event 00002040 and it is working fine.
Now i want to find out if we could utilitize emailing the employee reimbursement remittances for UK as we do here in the US using the same BTE.
I just want to know if our current BTE (business transaction event) can be set up for their group also along with generating the SAP script to format the remittance.
Earliest reply will be appreciated.
With regards,
Shree.J

Hi,
do you mind share with me how did you implement the Automatic email of remittnance advice to vendor after payment run?
I am in process research this solution. appreaciate if you can share with me if you have any info.
+91 9791122480
Thanks in advance.
regards
v.krishnamoorthy

Thirdparty remittance for Garnishment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for