Garnishment deduction amount greater than non exempt amount ??

Hi all,
Here is my doubt .
Say my garnishment deduction is 150$ and the minimum limit(non exempt ) to be deducted is only 100$ ,
What will happen when I run the payroll for the employee ?
Will he be errored out and written to the match code ?
Will the amount be written to DDNT or ARRS table or only 100 $ will be deducted and no error will be displayed.
Can anyone please tel me what are the possible outcomes ?
Thanks.

I got the answer on my own.

Similar Messages

F-32 Partial payment amount greater than net amount

Hi Experts,
We have recently a problem in clearing up payments in F-32. When we double-click the item under Partial Payment Tab, the warning message displays "Partial payment amount greater than net amount" then the value in the Payment Amount Column becomes negative. The users need to activate 2 separate entries for partial payment but instead of . How can we do this?
We have to post like this in partial payment under same customer:
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     20.08.2009     20.08.2009     5,000.00-     1,295.12
20110225     1400010330     DZ     19     25.02.2011     25.02.2011     2,000.00-     1,295.12-
So the the Assigned Value should be zero to post.

Thanks @Atif. Ok so now I understand that the "Total Difference Posting" amount inf-32 will create the new amount of the residual payment with Document Type AB.
Now with the Warning Message "Partial Payment Amount greater than the net amount", this is in a overpayment amount that is reflected in transaction F-32, here are the entries:
Assignment Doc Num      Doc Type      Post Key    Net Amt         Partially Paid Amt Payment Amt
2133004220     90005448     RV     01     3,707.02      3,305.71      401.31
2133015007     90020098     RV     01     7,836.68      6,737.25      1,099.43
2133016757     90022362     RV     01     10,521.31      8,603.87      1,917.44
2133137046     90187172     RV     01     11,367.68      0.00      11,367.68
2133137047     90187173     RV     01     1,354.09      0.00      1,354.09
2133137048     90187174     RV     01     1,739.82      0.00      1,739.82
2133137049     90187175     RV     01     994.57      0.00      994.57
20110419     90187176     RV     01     6.42      0.00      6.42
20110421     90187177     RV     01     44.94      0.00      44.94
20110425     90187178     RV     01     19.26      0.00      19.26
20081216     1400003657     DZ     19     3,421.86-     3,394.04-     27.82-
20081222     1400003706     DZ     19     1,000.00-     1,033.17-     33.17-
20090310     1400004396     DZ     19     420.51-     401.25-     19.26-
20090630     1400005319     DZ     19     786.13-     705.94-     80.19-
20090702     1400005349     DZ     19     596.04-     535.88-     60.16-
20090820     1400005790     DZ     19     5,000.00-     6,295.12-     1,295.12-
20090824     1400005827     DZ     19     308.16-     295.32-     12.84-
20091027     1400006377     DZ     19     400.72-     375.04-     25.68-
20091215     1400006796     DZ     19     349.89-     337.05-     12.84-
20100608     1400008253     DZ     19     200.09-     189.39-     10.70-
20101019     1400009279     DZ     19     165.85-     155.00-     10.85-
20101019     1400009280     DZ     19     254.65-     238.00-     16.65-
20101019     1400009281     DZ     19     160.64-     157.00-     3.64-
20101130     1400009595     DZ     19     10,000.00-     5,440.92-     4,559.08-
How is this possible that Document numbers 1400003706 and 1400005790 has overpaid amount. And both of them are downpayment documents? Is there any way I can clear them with the Invoices, I am also lost with this kind of scenario?

Garnishment - Special Rule for Non-Exempt Amount

There is calculation scheme for each special rule for non-exempt amount. For example federal rule for support is 04. The calculation scheme for this rule has 2 lines with operation multiplication and subtraction; and operand F1 and DN. Can someone explain to me what each line means and the cumulative effect of both the lines?
Thanks for your help!!
BBC

Hi,
Line 1 = F1 * DN i.e. Field 1 from infotype (IT0195 field 1 for fed exempt as per table T5UGA config) is multiplied by Disposable Net (wage type /G00) and stores result in R1 (intermediate result field)
Line 2 = DN - R1 i.e. subtract intermediate result stored from line 1 in R1 field from Disposable Net (/G00 wage type) to output result as minimum limit defined for nonexempt amount.
You can verify same in UGARN CALC (Garnishment Calculations section) in schema.
Thanks,
Ameet

Payment amount greater than net amount!

Payment amount greater than net amount! , i am receiving this error while doing partial payment.. plz help
Also reversed documents are not coming in partial payment tab in F-53 but it is showing as a open item in vendor balance.....

/hi,
First of all Check ur Clearig GL i.e Bank /Cash in that Relevant to cash Flow is ticked or not.If not ticked then tick it and then try again.
thanks
deepa

GR Cancellation amount greater than GR?

Hi Expert,
May I know in what situation the GR cancellation amount is greater than GR in PO history?
I am facing a problem that:
1. Create a PO for 4 pcs of Material A, 1000 USD total.
2. IV for the material A, 4 pcs also, 1000 USD. The date of IV was before the GR date.
3. GR (mvt type 101) material A, for 3 pcs, but is 250 USD.
4. GR cancellation (mvt type 102) material A for 4 pcs, 1000 USD.
This confuse me a lot because as I know we cannot maintain the material value in GR for PO, why mvt type 101 will come out a 250 USD?
I try to create the same senario again but everything is all right now without any setting. The MIGO also doesn't has a field for me to maintain price.
Any idea?
Thanks~!

from where exactly (which transaction, which field) did you pull the data?
4 pcs with a total of 1000 is just 250 per piece.
The 250 that you see for the movement, is that the price or the total value for the 3?
Usually SAP valuates the goods receipt with the invoice price if the IR was done before the GR, otherwise the GR is valuated with the PO price.
The reversal is done with the moving average.
You hide information in this example, as it is not logical to receive 3 but cancel 4.

Block Invoice amount greater than PO amount

Dear Expert,
Currently, I set a tolerance (incoming invoice--> define vendor-specific tolerance) to allow user to post Invoice greater than Amount received (case is PO service for partial receive). However, we want that it will block user to post invoice more then the total value of PO.
Currently, if I set the tolerance limit, then it's possible to post invoice More than PO value as long as the variance is under its tolerance limit.
Any advice?
thanks,
nasikhin

Hi Ajit,
thanks for your reply, could you please tell us which transaction key?? i've tried PP, BD, LA but nothing works.
Moreover, I wonder if the price variance occured because of this tolerance could be posted to the particular Expense/Inventory instead of new GL account for price variance.
Currently, it's posted to the GL account I set up on OBYC for transaction DIF..
And when I lookup to the PO history, the invoice amount is the same with amount received, although the real invoice amount is over.
Any suggestion will be very appreciated.
Thanks,
Nasikhin

Currency amounts greater than or equal to 15 digits and two decimals

Hi,
How do I handle currency amount (Indian Rupees) upto 15 digits and two decimals.
I need to upload the data through BAPI BAPI_ACC_DOC_POST.
But the F-02 transaction supports only 13 digits and two decimals.
how do I go about...
Please suggest..
thanks

This doesn't look like something specific to the API - does this happen with out-of-the-box Designer and Reporter?
If so, this should be asked in a different forum.
Also - the forums aren't an avenue for support. [Service Marketplace|https://service.sap.com] is.
Sincerely,
Ted Ueda

Invoice Tax amount difference than GR tax amount

Hi experts,
I got one issue from client the GR amount is 552873.75, and tax is93,988.54
and they got invoice from vendor showing amount 552873.75 and tax is93,988.50
when the user was trying to make the invoice verification he was trying to put 93,988.50
then mess were getting tax amount not correct 93,988.50(correct is93,988.54
we can resolve this by doing like this
we can make invoice verification as per GR amount and then balance we post through FB41.
IF IT is not right please let me know
Thanks
JC

Hi joshi,
what you have told is right we can deactivate check box in ftxp tax code then we can able to make invoice i know.
but only for one document we cant do it right there will be impact on other documents also.
please let me know is there any alternative solution.
Regards
JC
Edited by: c naidu on Jan 5, 2010 4:44 AM

Garnishabl Amount - Non exempt and Disposable net

Hi all ,
Can any please explain me in detail or forward me suitable material where I can gain enough knowledge on
this Garnishable amount using the Disposable net and Non exempt amounts.
Can anyone explain me with an example how we do the config for Disposable amount and Non exempt amount.
Thanks.
Edited by: Daniel Ben on Feb 28, 2008 5:57 PM

Adjusting the disposable net is done with processing class 59.
The following are valid values:
'1' Transfer to disposable net with same sign
2' Transfer to disposable net with sign reversed
3' Completely non-exempt, used for non-exempt garnishment refund wage types
4' Used for garnishments, used for exempt garnishment refund wage types
Processing class 60 determines whether the garnishment wage type should be saved in the results table.
The disposable net is the basis of calculation for garnishable amounts.
Disposable net is determined by values 1' and 2'.
If you need to create your own model to adjust disposable net, check the value of processing class 59 after copying your wage type(s) and adjust the value accordingly.
An Adjustment Model determines how the disposable net is to be adjusted to fit your company's requirements.
Within the Non-Exempt Amount section, you can define the different ways of determining the garnishable amount and how it is calculated .
The garnishable amount can be determine using the following:
Levy - You can indicate the exempt amount for a levy for each levy form. This is done by indicating for each form the number of filing status, exemptions, pay period, validity dates and the exempt amount.
Special Rules - Special rules for determining the garnishable amount can be stored. A special rule is used in cases where a model is not able to be used.
Federal Minimum Wage - You can indicate the minimum wage rate that is used in determining the garnishable amount in accordance with the Federal Minimum Wage.
The Model Non-Exempt is used to determine the garnishable amount. Here you can specify whether the minimum is exempt or non-exempt, a percentage or an amount, the federal minimum wage, and a Levy Form or Special Rule, if it applies.
Once a Model Non-Exempt is created, it is then attached to the Rule Non-Exempt to calculate the garnishable amount.

The amount charged to our credit card was greater than the amount on our invoice.

This last month, our credit card was charged was charged an amount greater than what appeared on our invoice. Why did this happen, and how can we get a refund of the difference?

Yes, of course that's what I tried first. I attempted to use the Contact Support box in the lower right corner of:
https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/topics/getting-started.html
And got this:
We're sorry, but our records indicate you aren't eligible for this support option.
Experts are always available in our free community forums.
Hence my post here.
However, it appears that the URL you provided takes me to a completely different chat application, so perhaps I'll have better luck there. I'll give it a try.
Thanks for your help.

MM-PUR: GR amount is different from IR amount for PO

Problem statement:
The GR amount showing in the PO history is greater than the IR amount.
Root Cause:
The following steps were taken in chronological order for the PO line item (PO quantity is 1, amount is 100):-
1. Invoice post (MIRO) was carried out for the line item with amount 100 and quantity 1.
2. User then wanted to reverse the invoice posted, so Subsequent Credit (MIRO) was carried out for the line item with amount 100, which caused the following problem.
3. Invoice posted (MIRO) again for the line item with amount 100 and quantity 1. As subsequent credit in step 2 will not deduct the quantity, the system thinks the total quantity received is 2 now!
4. User cancel the invoice post by using MR8M which result in leaving amount 50 in GR/IR clearing account because the reversal quantity is 1, and the rest 50 was posted to stock account.
5. Invoice posted (MIRO) again for the line item with amount 100 and quantity 1. Now the amount in GR/IR clearing account is 150.
6. Goods Receipt (GR) was performed with amount 150 to clear the GR/IR account. Now the amount on the last invoice is 100, but GR shows 150.
Question:
1. How to resolve this difference (note: all the related account document have been cleared already)?
2. As stated in the online help, Subsequent Debit/Credit has no impact on quantity. But why the quantity field still shows -1 for the subsequent credit in the PO history tab?
Thank you in advance for your help! Any comments would be appreciated!
Cheers,
Aaron
Edited by: Yibing Wang on Jun 30, 2008 6:22 PM
Edited by: Yibing Wang on Jun 30, 2008 6:23 PM

solved

Error Message FF747 -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

Hello,
We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
Best Regards
Amit Kulkarni

Hello
This may be a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like this to be posted along with the expense item

Payment Amount is greater than invoice amount in sales order

Hi experts:
I have a Sales order that contained originally 3 lines of which the first 2 lines was delivered totally and the third was delivered partially.
The client decided to change the remaining quantity for another reference so the procedure in the sales order was to add another line and try to close the third line by right click and "close row" but the option is not available because there is a partial delivery, so the option was to update the inicial quantity in the third line at the same as delivered and update.
Like a result a I could close the third line and leave a fourth line available to delivery, however when I open this Sales order again an try to update a message "payment amount is greater than invoice amount" and appears inmediately the "Deposit on Order" window.
Other Information: The quantities delivered was invoiced but no payment has been received.
Checking in the SCN I have not found some related information with this case because the existing answers are related with incomming and outgoing payments but like I mentioned before this docuements already have not payments.
In relation with the decimal places, my original decimal places configuration was 2 and it was updated to 3, issue that neither is mentioned in previous answers.
I will appreciate your help,
Thanks,
Manuel

Hi Manuel,
Your case is complicated by the fact you have not only undated the Sales Order which is partially delivered but also updated decimal places during the process. In this case, you are probably the best person to figure out what is the system expected number. You may restore your production db to test environment first. Then do whatever you could to fix the problem. If no solution can be found, you have to log a message to SAP support.
A general advice: do not fight with system for what you think system should accept.
Thanks,
Gordon

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error when doing incoming payment
regards
kavitha S

Hi Kavitha,
please check in the OINV table the balance due on the invoice. This amount has to match the payment. If the problem is due to different decimal places & you are using a version lower than 2007 you will be able to change the decimal places for this particular payment. If you are using 2007, you will no longer be able to reduce the number of decimal places. In that case you could check out SAP note 1321183 & verify with your accountant that the workaround may be used.
All the best,
Kerstin

Amount to credit greater than credit balance - goods return to AP Cred Note

Hi All,
I've got the following scenario:
We have a AP Goods Return on the system which totals £12.94 with freight charges of -£3.75. We have copied this to a AP Credit Note, but have amended the freight from -£3.75 to -£3.00(UK VAT Rate 15% applicable throughout). The total credit field now shows £13.80 and the credit balance field shows £12.94. When you try to add the document it gives an error "amount to credit greater than credit balance". I'm using 2005A PL53.
Can anyone please advise the reason behind the error and also what the correct way of handling this kind of transaction would be?
Kind regards,
Matt

Hi Wesley,
I tried both methods and it doesn't resolve the issue. Spoke to SAP, they gave me a solution and workaround, the issue is a bit more complicated as what it may seem. You manually have to close the goods return, create a standalone service credit note with the appropriate GL account to reverse out the "goods clearing account" entry created by the reversal journal. The bahaviour has been changed in SBO 2007 and therefore the problem is not present in this version anymore. Thanks for your help anyway.
Kind regards,
Matt
Edited by: Greeff Matt on Jun 5, 2009 9:47 AM

Garnishment deduction amount greater than non exempt amount ??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for