GR cost different from material cost

Hi,
I have few scenario below and hope to get clarification.
Below all correct?
Base on standard cost
1 MM03 $10 and purchase price is $8
   During GR it is debit stock $10 credit grc $8 and credit price diff of $2.
2 MM03 $10 and puchase price is $12
   During GR it is debit stock $10, debit price diff $2 credit grc $12
Base on MAP
3 MM03 $10 and purchase price is $8
   During GR it is debit stock $8 credit grc $8
4 MM03 $10 and puchase price is $12
   During GR it is debit stock $12 credit grc $12
Thanks

Hi,
I have few scenario below and hope to get clarification.
Below all correct?
Base on standard cost
1 MM03 $10 and purchase price is $8
During GR it is debit stock $10 credit grc $8 and credit price diff of $2.
2 MM03 $10 and puchase price is $12
During GR it is debit stock $10, debit price diff $2 credit grc $12
Base on MAP
3 MM03 $10 and purchase price is $8
During GR it is debit stock $8 credit grc $8
4 MM03 $10 and puchase price is $12
During GR it is debit stock $12 credit grc $12
very correct no issue
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Similar Messages

Challan material is different from material document----Message no. 8I572

Hi,
I am getting the following error in subcontracting process when reconciling through J1IFQ.
Challan material is different from material document----Message no. 8I572
After P.O. creation and issued the materials through 541 and created a subcontract challan 57f4 and G.R has been done when reconciling through J1IFQ i am getting the above mentioned error.
Thanks,
Kiran Bodla

Hi,
In spro --> taxon goods movemnt > indiac> business transaction --> subcontrcating --> maintain movement type grp
here miantain
0002     101
0002     542
0002     543     O
Hope help U !
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Challan material is different from material document

Dear All,
   When i going to reconciliation of subcontracting challan on t-code J1IFQ
*material document -MIGO Number(which was created at the time of MIGO)*
*Year-2009*
when i feel the detail like
year            challan no             Item
2009           00000001
it also show a warning message *material document MIGO Number(which was created at the time of MIGO) 2009 is allocated a challan during GR**
im getting a error message
challan material is different from material document
Pls Guide me
Thanks
Amin
Edited by: sekh amin on Jul 9, 2009 8:16 AM

M also facing the same problem and getting the same error message.
"Chalan material is different from material document"
But when I checked material and challan, everything was OK.
Can anyone guide me to solve the issue.
Regards
Edited by: sapsarang on Jul 13, 2009 8:14 AM

Challan Material is Different from Material Document Message No. : 8I 572..

Dear All,
Good afternoon. In my company, after version upgrade from ECC5.0 to ECC6.0, facing one peculiar issue i.e in MIGO for subcontract order : When I enter challan number for reference in pop-up, We are getting the below error
"Challan Material is Different from Material Document Message No. : 8I 572..."
Creation of preliminary activites before migo in one user login and if i try migo for the same in same login, no errors reported. but if I do the MIGO from different user login, i have noticed with above error and vice versa.
For this as a abaper, if I debug for trouble shooting from MIGO, no error noticed from any logins for the same activity.
Kindly help us.
Arunachalam S

Dear Hema,
Thanks for your reply.
As you mentioned, every thing has been checked and found okey.
The observation is with same authorization, User A can able to inward the sub-contracting material but User B coud'nt do so and noticed error of "Challan Material is Different from Material Document Message No. : 8I 572.."
Even thought,the input information for the both logins are same.
have a nice day.
Arunachalam S

"challan material is different from material document " error in GR

hi all..
when i am trying to do GR with respect to challan that i have created its showing
"challan material is different from material document "
if i didn choose the option "Refer sub-con challan" and tried to post it shows dump error of
"Exception condition "T681Z_MISSING" raised.".
dont we get the values while creating sun con challan in J1IF01 ?
can you suggest where i have missed the steps.
Thanks
r.Kannan.

Whenever inwarding the material against the Sub contracting , challen no to be given, but can you tell , which version you r working,
Its this problem continue for all the sub contracting & for only on login or many logins
Regards,
Suresh.P

[help]why data on table (master ) different from materialized view(slave)?

We have had Oracle RAC 2 Groups (master and slave).
We have created materialized from slave to master. and I have created materialized view log on master .
When slave group job is broken a long time(12 Hrs). We refreshed job and runned job id.
But I have found database on materialized view (slave) different from TABLE on master group. (m$log =0row)
Please tell me how can we resolve Or because that problem is m$log

Yes I do have a unique identifier on each record in the base table and therefore also in the MV.
So now the Downstream application has to update some of its own database tables based on what is in the MV that I provide - just so I understand how would that work e.g.:
1. MV gets refreshed from my base table every minute
2. Some records are newly inserted and some simply updated
and this is the part I don't understand (I might be missing something obvious)....
3. Downstream application interrogates the MV every (say 1-2 minutes) and updates its own tables based on the data there.....but let's say MV contains 10,000 records and in the last minute 100 of those records have been updated and another 100 inserted - how will it know the 200 records it needs to pull?
Thanks again

Material Ledger Unit Of Measurement different from Material Master

Dear Team,
In my client, there is a difference between unit visible in CKM3N and MM03. The base unit of measurement in MM03 is MT. Other than that, there are some other units maintained (not M3) in additional data tab in material master. In CKM3N, the visible unit is M3. M3 is not present anywhere in MM03.
Why would such unit flow in material ledger table? (CKMLPP has unit M3). Please advise.
One more observation is that when there is some price change document in Material Ledger, the proper UoM (MT) is being captured. Only in the basic price determination structure visible unit for each head is M3. Please check the attached screen shot.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Jay Shah.

Hi..
Refer to Data Inconsistency of BUOM in Material Ledger Tables

Project stock - sub-contracting - Challan matl is different from matl doc

Hi,
We have sub-contracted with project stock ( Special stock Q ) materials to SC vendor.
While doing challan reconciliation with J1IFQ , we are getting the error
" Challan material is different from material document"
We are on ECC 6 support pack level 16.
Please advise solution.
Rgds,
Manohar

Number ranges maintained for 57FC
Ser Grp    No                  Year               From                     To            Current number
01              01     2009     0000000001     0000099999               226
11             01                          2009     0000000001     0000199999                  18
Is there a problem in this number range. For normal sub-contracting , we did not face any problem so far.
Please advise.
Rgds,
Manohar

Auto message determination for Freight Vendor when different from main ven

Hi All,
We have an issue with auotmatic output determination of a purchase order for a freight vendor, when the freight vendor is different from material vendor.
We are creating a PO for raw-material for vendor 'A'. In the same PO we are maintaining freight condition (FRA1/FRB1/FRC1) and for that condition we are maintinaing a different vendor (e.g Fedex). Now when we save the PO we want the system to output the PO via FAX to both the Vendors (without any manual intervention).
How can we achieve this?
Thanks in Advance
Venkat

Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for your reply.
as per my understanding, you mean to say that freight vendor has to be maintained as CR partner to the material vendor. If my understanding is correct, then the issue is that my client is not interested in maintaining Freight vendor as partner to the Material Vendor. And one more point to be noted is, most of the Purchase Orders are created automatically by MRP (Reorder point planning) . Freight vendor is maintained in the contract. MRP uses the contract as source and creates release orders.
is there any way to create new access sequence for message type NEU.so that system access the table KONV and field LIFNR to find the freight vendor.
As of now i am unable to find this table and field name in the field catalog for creating new condition table.
looking forward to hear from you soon.
Regards
Venkat

Cost Analysis result different from the cost estimate quantity structure re

Hi
Cost Analysis result different from the cost estimate quantity structure result in the same costing
run why this happen like this. ( in CK40N costing run result -- Cost analysis -- double click on costing result it shows cost estimate quantity structure result values different from cost analysis value )
Pls advice....
Regards
Kesharika

It depends on your costing variant. For sample, if you take the price in the 1° price estimated on the material view and this data has changed, you can have a difference between the first and the second estimate.
Perhaps also, it's just a definition of layout.
And 3rd hypothesis : you are looking on component in the ck40n and the variant don't take in account your cost component and just the material price.
Christophe

Messg-AAPO189 :Account object Cost Center differs from that in asset master

At the time of Asset Acquisition in T-Code F-90 using Internal order, the system throws the following error:
Message-AAPO189 :Account object Cost Center differs from that in asset master
But in Asset Master data and Internal Order Master data's Cost Centers are same.
And we are not facing this problem for all Assets (only for few asset class only we are facing this error).
Please guide on this.
Note:
We are not using Joint Venture Accounting.
Regards
JS
Edited by: JS on Aug 12, 2009 7:14 PM

Closed

Routing different from Standard Cost: Scrap Variance Calculation

Hi,
We have issue with Scrap Variance Calculation/WIP calculation when the Routing in the production order is different from the routing in th standard cost. When we run varaince calculation we are getting an error message saying that variance can be calculated as quantity structre of the production order is different from quantity structure of the standard cost. I understand that this is standard SAP. But routing changes seems to be pretty common acorss the Industries espcially when the demand is high and the manufacturing happens in different machines.Do any of you had similar issues and can you share how this can be resolved.
Thanks,Sasi

Hi Sasi
Go to OPR4_KKS AND OPR4_KKS1 and see... I think you can convert this msg into warning message..
Regards
Ajay M

Account assignment group is different in Intercompany Billing from Material Master

Hello,
Account assignment group is different in Intercompany Billing from Material Master.
Account assignment group in Billing and Intercompany Billing is feched from Material Master.
In Material Master, account assignment group is assigned as 12.
In Billing, account assignment group is 12 but in Intercompany Billing, account assignment group is 13.
Please help me to understand why in Intercompany Billing, account assignment group is 13.
Best Regards,
Debashri Dutta

Check the table MVKE for the values maintained for field KTGRM. You can see the sales org-DC combinations for which the AAG is maintained as 13 for this material. This may give you clues for investigation.

Urgent:Profit centre differing from SO to material master

Hi SAP Gurus
May i know where from Profit centre gets populated in the SO(Line item level-A/c assignment Tab-Profit centre field).
To my understanding it gets populated from material master.
But i have a sales order wherein the PC has PC$$$$ but when i checked the material master data ,i could find PC##### in the sales general plant view.
Why it is differing?
What i need to check further?
Regards
Sush
Edited by: Sushma Gopichetty Laxman rao on Oct 8, 2008 3:49 PM

Hello Sushma,
May i know where from Profit centre gets populated in the
SO(Line item level-A/c assignment Tab-Profit centre field).
To my understanding it gets populated from material master.
But i have a sales order wherein the PC has PC$$$$ but when
i checked the material master data ,i could find PC##### in the sales general plant view.
Why it is differing?
What i need to check further?
As you have cited that the profit Center set in Material Master record is different to the value available at Sales Order, please check in following points:-
1:- Check the Change History log of the particular Sales Order.
2:- Check whether there are any User exit being used which is altering the value of Profit Center of the Sales Order with the help of Technical consultant.
Kindly share you observation based upon these above pointers.
Regards,
Sarthak

Derivation rule for Product from Material Group

Dear All,
Is it possible derive product from Material Group. The scenario is as below.
We executed KE30 report (Classic Drill down) for Product, the we are able to see the profitability for different products, when we click on the list button (Find button) againist the product at the bottom we found not assigned, we selected that and we found there are some un assigned amounts (without product). when we see the line items for the same the line items are coming with out product ( product field is emply)
Another observation is we created profitability assessment cycle (KEU5) in which cost center is the sender and material group is the receiver. when we run this cycle system is not distibuting the costs to the products, in the sender and receiver its executed with zero values.
In derivation rule KEDR we gave the logic to derive product from material group.
please guide the way which we are following is correct or not. can we derive product from material group.
Thanks,
Siva Reddy.S

Hi
Yes you can derive using "Derivation" method in KEDR and maintain a mapping of Mat Grp to Product... But that is not the right way
You need to find out why some lines are posted w/o products.. They can be genuine cases....
Also for assessment, either specify the Product as receiver or run KE28 Top Down Dist in order to allocate values from Mat group to Products..... Deriving Product from Mat group does not seem to be the nice way
br, Ajay M

GR cost different from material cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for