Document Splitting with Different Business Area

HI
I have a situation, where i need to create a new document type and it needs to be configured in such a way that vendor invoices and credit notes can be booked with the correct doc splitting and using different Business Areas.
I like to know if this is possible, and if yes how.
Earlier the client used to post the transactions, with different business areas, as we get only a warning message to reset the business area of the vendor.
Now that we have activated New G/L accounting, with document splitting we get the warning message,
but then the profit center will not balance, so we have an error.
The client requires that they need to post to a different business area, and the document splitting should happen.
Any suggestions on this will be great.

Hi Srikanth,
In my config setting under Document Splitting i have the Zero Balance ticked for it.
My Scenario is as an Ex. I am debiting a G/L account for 1000, and giving Business Area X, with a cost Center which is assigned to Business Area X.
And Crediting a Vendor for 1000 with Business Area Y.
Will this scenario work with Document Splitting enabled, i am doubtful on this, but my client needs this.
Can you tell me if this is a possible scnerio.
If yes then how?

Similar Messages

*Billing Document Splitting with Credit control Area*

Hi
please give me solution for the following matter
there have some invoice splitting with credit control area from sales order header , because some orders available credit control area some order not available credit control area . can i create one billing document for those without splitting?
thanks
L.C

Hi L.C,
You can see VBAK-KNKLI field differs in sales document. The split is standard system behavior since
these are header fields. Please refer to note 11162 for details on split criteria for invoices.
In order to avoid the split you can either clear the fields in the copy control or you can change your credit management
configuration so that the credit accounts determined are the same.
I hope it can help you.
Regards
Ruy Castro

GR/IR Automatic Clearing for Different Business areas items

Hello All,
we have different business areas, and some times we create a PO for all business areas and invoice it in a specific business area
in F.13 automatic clearing:
for GR/IR account
Documents with different business area cannot be cleared.
any idea to solve this issue is appreciated,

Thanks for your reply,
I've tried such a solution with more parameters ( EBELN, XREF3 and EBELP)
but in F.13 :
- the document cannot be cleared when >>> selecting GR/IR account special process.
if we treat GR account as a normal GL account, I mean without selecting GR/IR account special process.
the document can be clear
i want to be able to clear the document with selecting GR/IR field ( is it possible )
and if it is not allowed, do we will face a problem by clearing GR account without selecting GR/IR parameter ??
Many Thanks

Number range based on different business area for same document type

Hi All,
The scenario is my client wants to give the different number range for a particular document type based on different business area.
Is there any user exit by which I can restrict the same.
Regards,
Meenakshi

Hello,
Document number ranges are created per company code and fiscal year. You cannot create / restrict the document number ranges per business area.
Business areas a independent of all organizational values, they cut across all company codes.
Regards,
Ravi

Prevent invoice split with different partners on item level

Dear Experts,
in a sales order we have different representatives (partner function "VE") on item level due to commission issues. Now we have the requirement to prevent the invoice split with different representatves on item in order-related billing. While in copy control it is easy to prevent invoice split due to different VBRK-fields we have not found a userexit ( or copy-control) to prevent invoice split with different partners.
Anybody has an idea to this issue?
Thanks for your help.
Mark

Dear Mark,
You are on the right-track.
As, there is no standard routine, you have to write your requirement in existing routine (i.e. modify standard routine with your requirement)
To do so, go to:
T. Code: VOFM --> Copying requirement(Menu-bar) --> Billing Document (Take help from ABAPer).
Write code as an implicit enhancement:
clear: KURGV-KUNNR
- {Please confirm the Table-Field name}
And if there is any further changes, ABAper will help you out.
Once modified, attach your routine in to Field: VBRK/ VBRP.
Best Regards,
Amit
Note: I think, following thread will help you and clear the requirement:
Re: Avoid invoice split (Please go-through it)

Different Business Area in Customer line item while Billing

Dear Friends,
We are on Ecc 6.0 and We have a requirement of Different Business Area in Customer line while billing. Since we had defined Business area location wise and requirement is Sundry Debtors should always book to Location as maintained in delivery plant field of sales area data in customer master.
Requirement:- Our material is assigned to Plant 115.In customer master, sales area data -> shipping tab -> Delivery Plant (KNVV- VWERKS), we are maintaining "112", Now while billing and while generating Accounting document account entry is
Customer 1000.00 (Business area=115)
sales 1000.00 (Business area=115)
But our requirement while accounting document after billing is
Customer 1000.00 (Business area=112), system should check and derive the same from TABLE KNVV - VWERKS(DEL PLANT)
sales 1000.00 (Business area=115).
Please revert.
Regards,
Sandeep

Dear Friends,
One can do the same via using a userexit.
Regards,
Sandeep

Proper use of one table in different business areas

Hi
We will be using certain DB tables in several business areas and we are more than one person to define them.
If a table is loaded from the database for each of the business areas it will be numbered 'table 1, 2...' which does't seem very desirable. Also I'd rather define hiearchies only once and for all.
If a table is loaded only once and used for all the business areas all the joins which are necessary in the different business areas are shown. This will be confusing. If one of us considers a certain join unnecessary he might accidentially delete the wrong one belonging to a different business area.
Exporting the business areas including the joins regularly is probably not a great help if afterwards new joins for other business areas were added.(?)
Am I misunderstanding the concept of Discoverer?
How do you handle such a situation?
Advice appreciated
Franziska

Hi Michael, et al,
I'm just planning my EUL and your comments in the last post seem relevant.
My general plan is as follows:
(1) Create a BaseMaster BA which is used to bring and tables/views from the database into disco. The folders in here will be created with "New Folder from database" and be fairly straightforward, with only very simple calculations and no aggregations in calculations. The joins will echo the joins in the underlying database. This is not shared with Users.
(2) Create a CustomMaster BA which contains Custom Folders which consist of various SQL views of the database. The SQL in these may use have some more complex calculations and these calculations may include aggregation. This will not be shared with users.
(3) Create a CentralMaster BA which contains Complex Folders which are assembled from items from the BaseMaster BA and the CustomMaster BA. These folders may include more complex calculations and the calculations may include aggregated items.
(4) Create a number of User BA's. Using Manage Folders, share the relevant Folders from the Central Master.
I've got a few questions relating to this.
(a) Custom Folders based on Folders
It would seem nice to me if it were possible to create Custom Folders which were based on other Folders, rather than Database Views. Then, even if you need a view and a complex transformation of that view in your business area, you still only have one place where the EUL brings that view into disco. My understanding is that this is not possible. Am I right? I suppose there could be an argument that complex transformations should be pushed back to the DBA but it seems reasonable to me that sometimes this sort of thing could be within the remit of the disco admin?
(b) SQL Efficiency
Am I right in thinking that generally a complex folder is usually not much less efficient than using a base folder because the SQL interpreter ends up optimising the SQL?
And a last question which has turned out rather complex - by all means ignore it if you like - it's me getting to grips with the process.
(c) Nested Complex Folders
I presume that if a transformation is needed which would in a normal database environment would need a mainquery and a subquery, then this could be done in a
number of ways (adhering to the above methodology) by:
(i) Get the DBA to write a view which does both mainquery and subquery and then bring into the BaseMaster and then straight into the CentralMaster folder.
(ii) Get the DBA to write the subquery, bring this into the BaseMaster and then implement the mainquery in the CentralMaster.
(iii) Create a Folder in CustomMaster which implements both mainquery and subquery and then bring this into the CentralMaster folder.
(iv) Create a Folder in the CustomMaster which implements just the subquery and then implement the main query in the Central Master.
If you've got this far - thankyou for baring with me.
Perhaps there's something written about this sort of thing or maybe it's just a matter of practice!
Any thoughts on all this would be much appreciated.
Kind regards
Suhada

Not posted Treasury transactions- problem with new Business area (NewGL)

Hi all,
I have to change the Treasury account assignment objects due to a restructure. Currently, all TR transactions are assigned to one business area only.
In future, there will be 3 (different) business areas.
I have added new products, transaction tpyes etc and I have made further customising
settings. It looks ok and I can enter new transactions, settle and post them.
Problems I do have with already existing deals (fixed term and Forex transactions).
In here I get posting errors with message:
Balancing field "Business Area" in line item 001 not filled
Message no. GLT2201
I have added additional account assignment references for the new Business Areas
and assigned to product types and account assignment
What happens when I create a deal?
Is that information (product type/ transaction/ account assignment) alreaedy stored in a table and used, when processing the deal further?
Can I somehow change that original assignment per deal now?
I think my problem lies in that the system wants to use the old assignment but also the new and it comes to conflict in field business area.
Any hints much appreciated and will be reqarded as usual.
Thanks
Hein

Assign Business area in the following step (ECC 6.0)
SPRO - Financial Supply Chain Management - Treasury and Risk Management - Transaction Manager - General Settings - Accounting - Link to Other Accounting Components - Allocate Additional Account Assignments to Account Assignment References
Kalyan

Same folders in different business areas

Hi,
Is it possible to access folders across business areas?
I was not able to do the above so I created (New folder from database) the same folder into 2 different business areas. But I cannot have the same names. Why? I see some folders created previously with the same names in both the business areas. Is there some other way?
Thanks in advance.

Hello everyone
Business area names, folder names, and join names are unique across the system. It is possible to have the same folder in multiple business areas and this is not uncommon. It is also possible to reference the same object using multiple folders, making sure the identifier and folder names are unique.
If you have a folder that you want to duplicate, rather than share between business areas, you can highlight the folder in one area, copy it using CTRL-C, and the using CTRL-V paste it into the other area. Doing this gives you a copy of the folder pointing at the same underlying object. This is useful if you want to reference the same object several times, say for aliasing purposes or for ease of querying. I do this all the time when working with fiscal time folders and it works like a dream.
Hope this helps
Regards
Michael

Treasury Management- split postings by business areas

Hi,
Currently we have the FSCM TM set up in a way that we do not differentiate by Business Areas. All postings go to central place and distributed later by percnetage base.
In additional account assignments we have only one receiver defined. So the number of posting references/ product Types/ transaction types is fairly smal
Because business requires better visibility and more exact assignment we would now have to differentiate in posting from Treasury a potential split.
To me it seems like we would need to have the differentiation enabled through creating new transaction types.
Is there a another way to achieve this? Can we use different separator fields? Is there a user exit we could use for this ?::::
Any hints highly appreciated
Thanks
Hein

Hi,
just to clarify:
One deal is per posting. There is a 1:1 between deal and business area, no split of this into multiples.
However, I do not have this field business area in the deal creation and as such it is not passed on through to FI postings.
As stated above there is an option to have this via posting reference and product and transaction type differentiated- but is there an easier way than having so many transaction types as business areas?
Issue is, we have about 10 different business areas that have treasury deals.
Any ideas?
Cheers
Hein

How can I determine which Layout Designer documents go with a business part

How can I determine which Layout Designer documents go with a business parter? I need to be able to query the database and make sure the right business partners are assigned to the right Layout Designer documents without going into the Layout Designer.
TJA

Hi,
You may check this thread:
Print Layouts related to Business Partners
Thanks,
Gordon

Payment clearing on amount with mismatching business areas

Hi, gurus:
We recently activated AR module under 4.6c.
We use automatic clearing which calls FB1D, based on amount match between the cash receipt and the invoice.
The invoice comes with an business area, but the cash receipt record (RM doc type) has a blank business area.
The payment will clear, but SAP actually creates a new WO record to clear the invoice. The WO record contains the business area from the invoice.
The RM cash receipt record has no business area after the payment clearance. This creates a problem for us during reporting for the business area, and the new WO record also screws up the real WO amount in our Write-Off reports.
Is there a user exit in FB1D(SAPMF05A) that would allow us to add the business area to the RM record during payment clearance, and avoid the creation of the WO record ?
Thanks.

May be you can use Substitutions:
http://webmailmty.softtek.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/5b/d231a843c611d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards.

Validation require for different business area in MRO

Dear friends
System is allowing posting of different business area in Miro (Line item & Header item).For disallowing I have checked Validation, I think it is not usable.Please suggest me another solution.
regds
sachin

Hello,
You can use MRM_HEADER_CHECK bAdI for this validation.
or
You can use Enhancement (CMOD transaction) LMR1M001 -EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 for this validation
Regards,
Burak

Document splitting with two characteristics Business area & Profit Center

Dear Experts,
is it possible to split the document with two characteristics .
Business area
Profit center
Can anyone suggest!!
Regards,
Naru

Hi,
Thanks for you immediate response...
i tried with this it is splitting only profit center and not splitting for business area, Please correct if i am wrong.
Amount
Business area
Profit center
Vendor A
4000
Expense
2000
A
A
Expense
2000
B
B
Should split like below
Vendor A
2000
A
A
Expense
2000
A
A
Vendor A
2000
B
B
Expense
2000
B
B

Error while posting billing document - Error belongs to Business area/G/L a

Hi All,
When i am posting the billing document i ma getting below error message:
Business Area must be entered, Pl check if the Business Area is correct Message no. ZT017
I think it is due to MWST tax condtion type and respective G/L account only.
When i post 17% tax of MWST i am able to post it - it is having one G/L account,
When i post 5% tax of MWST, i am not able to post it - Different G/L Account - I am getting above error.
Please suggest us to proceed further.
Regards
Lakshmikanth

Hi Lakshmipathi,
This is not at all related to VKOA settings, because the G/L account determination through OB40 here. But every thing is in place. A1 tax code with XXXXXX G/L account is working fine, A2 tax code with YYYYY G/L account is not working fine. If change A2 tax code G/L account to XXXXXX, it is working fine. Here only with YYYYY G/L account issue,
The error details already available in this thread.
Thanks and Regards
Lakshmikanth

Document Splitting with Different Business Area

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for