GR/IR Clearing not happening SAP

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem in GR/IR Clearing. When i run the program SAPF124, at first i got the error message entry missing in table TF123 and then i made necessary changes in OB74, but still the problem is not solved, i get the message "Only accounts with debit and credit postings are included" and it shows me the documents which is not been invoiced, but i have several document which has been GR and Invoiced, those documents are not appearing in the output for clearing. I am confused what's gone wrong.
Could somebody tell me why its happening and how to overcome this issue.
Thanks
Best Regards,
gj

Hi,
I think the issue is that you're clearing your invoices on a accounting point of view and not from an MM point of view.
In our business we have disabled this transaction precisely for this: clearance in accounting isn't reflected in the original PO.
What is the status of your PO in R/3 after clearing via MR11? Is it still to be invoiced or not? Is BW reflecting this situation properly? I mean if the PO is still to be invoiced in R/3 (ME23, ME23N) and BW is reflecting the same, then this is correct. You'll have then to report this from an AR/AP datasource....
Can you clear this PO on the MM side?
As far as I remember, one the table behind this is RSEG; perhaps creating another DSource and combining it with 2LIS_02 in a multi could reflect this! For instance with two key figs: Open Invoice Amount (MM) and Open (not cleared) Invoice (FI)...
just an idea....
hope this helps....
Olivier.

Similar Messages

  • Automatic clearing not happening while doing invoice cancellation

    Hi All,
    When I reverse a billing document [normal invoice], the accounting document which gets generated is not getting cleared with the previous accounting document. The accounting document type in both original and reversal is u2018DDu2019. I have also checked the reversing document type settings in OBA7.
    The above scenario is working fine with one company code [ABC], but with other company code [XYZ] the auto-clearing of accounting documents is not happening. The sales document types in both the cases are same.
    On further analysis, I found that the reversal accounting document is having posting key 11(credit memo) instead of 12(Reverse invoice), but in other company code[ABC] the posting key is appearing correctly in the reversal accounting document i.e. posting key as 12.
    Can you please confirm if this happening due to incorrect posting key? Also kindly suggest how this can be corrected?
    Thanks in advance.
    Dheeraj Tolani

    Dear,
    When I post the reverse billing, this message info me:
    Automatic clearing of billing document and canc. doc. 90601784 not poss.
    Automatic clearing of billing document 90601783 and canc. doc. 90601784 not poss.
        Message no. VF208
    Diagnosis
        The system cannot clear billing documents and cancellation documents
        because, for example individual item updating is deactivated.
    System Response
        The billing document can be created.
    Procedure
        The FI documents are cleared manually
    of curse, this message only occurs in company 1500, and in the other company 2000, the reverse billing can automatic clearing,  and have nothing message occurs.

  • GRIR clearing not happening

    Friends,
    I am facing the following problem. Please help me out
    While GR is made, vendor number is updated agaist each line item, i.e, 'inventory debit line item' and 'GRIR clearing line item' each has the vendor number.
    But while doing MIRO,
    only the line item for 'Vendor account debit' is having the vendor number against it . The 'GRIR clearing credit' line item is not having the vendor number against it. This is creating problem. We need to configure so that the vendor number is copied against this line item also.
    Beacause of this , the GRIR clearing account is not cleared automatically.
    Can anybody suggest what is to be done so that the vendor number is also updated in the accounting document generated while posting invoice (MIRO)

    Hi,
    the standard practice is just Assignment (ZUONR) which is in turn sort key 014 (PO + line). Re vendor, see my previous post. Re business area, that should not be a problem at all as the business area should be derived from the plant which is the same in the GR and in the IR documents, so if the PO line is the same, the BA cannot be different. Same is true for material, it is either empty (service PO's) or the same in GR and IR.
    There is one more thing to mention here: if you are using goods receipt based invioce verification (flag in he PO line, Delivery tab), then the matching of the GR/IR items should not be made on PO line level (= assignment), but also based on the goods receipt document number. I.e, an invoice must be assigned to a particular GR (and not to any GR). This is typical for scheduling agreements. Pls. refer to the F1-help on the checkbox "GR/IR account special process." on the selection screen of F.13, it should explain very well how it is working. No additional setup needed here, so the above are still valid: use only ZUONR and nothing else as the clearing criteria for GR/IR accounts.
    Hope that helps, points welcome
    Csaba

  • Automatic Cenvat Clearing Not Happening

    Dear All,,
    We made automatic clearing configuration for Cenvat clearing .In that i selected criteria EBELN, EBELP,PRCTR,XBLNR, But i am not able to clear cenvat clearing in F.13.
    Kindly tel me,Is there any setting is missing.
    Kindly suggest me for come out of this problem
    Thnaks and Regards
    Girish.

    HI Tammy,,
    thanks for immediate response...
    KIndly explain in detail..
    i already maintain 5 criteria in automatich posting configuration.COuld you tel me which filed common for Miro and excise invoice ..then we can clear automatically.
    While runing F.13 SYSTEME will check common referance for both dcoument means miro document and excise invoice document.
    in that which is common filed for this cenvat clearing.
    kindly suggest me..
    thanks and regards
    girish

  • Firefox thinks I am in Indonesia, how do I reset this to in US (all sites I access from firefox default to Indonesian, e.g. google and yahoo). I have cleared the cache. This does not happen on explorer on same laptop.

    I am based in the US. Since a business trip to Jakarta, everything I bring up in Firefox defaults to Indonesia, e.g. yahoo comes up in Indonesian id.yahoo.com, google displays as google.co.id.
    I have:
    - cleared the firefox cache.
    - searched settings for a country or language setting
    - searched firefox help archive
    This does not happen on explorer on the same pc.

    I believe that our “Werbung problem” adds an additional second hyperlink to the pop-up window. This second link is activated whenever you trigger a saved hyperlink to a Mail.com site.
    I had the same problem and eliminated it by deleting all bookmarks, hyperlinks and automatic links that take firefox to a mail.com address. So I just deleted all bookmarks I had saved for mail.com. I also changed my home page link because it also went to my email at mail.com. I then did a warm boot, opened firefox and re-saved my bookmarks and homepage to the desired addresses. Good luck.

  • Automatic clearing not happend for Rebate Accruals

    Hi SAP Experts,
    The rebate agreements are settled and payment is made for all rebate accrual posting for the previous quarter but automatic clearing has not happened.
    Can anybody give me some input where to check for the automatic clearing for the rebate accrual.
    Thanks in advance.
    Subho.

    Paymnet made means credit notes generaeted or only crdit memos been raised
    clarify me so
    BJ

  • When I try to open the "markets" page on the Firefox hompage, it displays for 3 or 4 seconds and then drops off; I get a white screen; this does not happen with Explorer.

    When I open "markets" from the homepage, it comes up but drops off after a few seconds and
    I get a white page. This does not happen with Explorer. A similar but much more extensive
    problem happened a month or so ago (I couldn't open attachments). I called Microsoft and the
    fellow messed about with my computer for an hour or so, but ended up saying he couldn't help
    me. However, when he went away, the problems went away.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == two weeks ago?

    ~~red:<u>'''''displays for 3 or 4 seconds and then drops off'''''</u>~~
    If you have RealPlayer Browser Record Plugin <u>'''extension'''</u>, disable/remove the RealPlayer Browser Record Plugin extension in the RealPlayer Preferences (RP: Tools > Preferences > Download & Recording) . Restart Firefox and test.
    <u>See Noah_SUMO's illustrated answer in this thread if the above is not clear:</u> https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/557689?
    The RealPlayer Browser Record Plugin <u>'''extension'''</u> adds some extra features like saving media files.
    Be sure not to get confused with the RealPlayer <u>'''plugin'''</u> (Tools > Add-ons > Plugins) that plays media files.
    https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/557689?
    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/459823
    https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/446905?
    https://support.mozilla.com/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?forumId=1&comments_parentId=472596
    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/461211
    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/forum/1/376867
    See [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] and [[Troubleshooting plugins]].
    ~~red:<u>'''''Other Issues'''''~~: to correct security/stability issues</u>
    <u>'''Update Java'''</u>: your ver. 1.6.0.17; current ver. 1.6.0.20 (<u>important security update 04-15-2010</u>)
    ''(Windows users: Do the manual update; very easy.)''
    See: '''[http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using+the+Java+plugin+with+Firefox#Updates Updating Java]'''
    Do the update with Firefox closed.
    <u>'''Update Shockwave for Director'''</u>: your version 11.0; current version 11.5
    NOTE: this is not the same as Shockwave Flash; this installs the Shockwave Player.
    SAVE the installer to your hard drive (Desktop is a good place so you can find it). When the download is complete, exit Firefox (File > Exit), locate and double-click in the installer you just downloaded, let the install complete.
    IMPORTANT: I have found it wise to always restart your system after doing anything with Adobe products.
    See: '''[http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using+the+Shockwave+plugin+with+Firefox#_Installing_Shockwave Installing Shockwave]'''

  • Euro conversion is not happening in Excise invoice

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    When I am creating excise invoice for export order, the conversion maintained in OB08 for USD is happening in INR but the same is not happening for EURO. The EURO conversion is also maintained in OB08.
    When I am creating Sales order, the warning message is coming that 'Pricing/euro: Attention: Euro Customizing not maintained'.
    Kindly help me to sort out this problem.
    With Warm and Kind Regards
    BHIKSHAPATHI

    Hi
    go to transaction cose EWCF and select Confirm euro currency Customizing and  execute.
    hope this will solve ur problem.
    do revert
    regards
    chander

  • Overhead calculation not happening after using Overhead key and orgin group

    overhead calculation not happening after using Overhead key and orgin group.
    There was a runtime error earlier related to u201Cdefine credit u201C IMG node under costing sheet component and we have applied SAP note 769946 and that error was gone out of the way
    We want to apply/add Overhead to SFG/FG materials.
    We are using PP order with PCC(product cost collector) as the cost object , i.e costing by period.(system ECC 6)
    But our problem is with material standard cost estimate process.
    We have assigned overhead keys to the percentage rates in costing sheet for material standard costing and assigned the origin groups to the credits of costing sheet. But after running the cost estimate overhead is not taking into account for standard cost calculation.
    In the define credit entry table key field is valid to date strangly and actually system should allow one than one entry with same valid to date and same sec.Cost element(type-41) for different cost centers.
    But if we without using overhead key and origin group, the entire cost in that supporting cost center will come to all materials (SFG/FG) and we can not distinguish between different product materials(SFG /FG).
    We have checked all things as mentined below.
    Firstly that the correct costing sheet is assigned to the valuation
    variant.
    That the costing sheet is entered for the appropriate material type:
    Finished and semi finished or material components.
    All of the above can be checked and verified via transaction OKKN.
    In addition make sure that the base value maintained is present in the
    costing, for example the base may include an Origin group, is that
    origin group part of the materials being costed?
    Similarly if the base is found and values exist how is the overhead
    rate of the costing sheet set up, is it valid etc.
    And finally do a similar check for the credit.
    we doubt this as a programm error...
    So, request all experts to have ur feedback..

    Dear,
    Check your origin group & material unit of mesaurement is same.
    some time in costing sheet origin group is maintain in different unit & for materail it's maitain in other unit of mesaurement.
    You can see unit of measure for material in Additional data - unit of measure.
    Check BOM component material unit also.
    Check same  unit of measure is maintain in KZS2
    I hope above will useful.
    GOPAN

  • Overhead calculation not happening after using orgin group.

    overhead calculation not happening after using orgin group.
    There was a runtime error earlier related to u201Cdefine credit u201C IMG node under costing sheet component and we have applied SAP note 769946 and that error was gone out of the way
    We want to apply/add Overhead to SFG/FG materials.
    We are using PP order with PCC(product cost collector) as the cost object , i.e costing by period.(system ECC 6)
    But our problem is with material standard cost estimate process.
    We have assigned overhead keys to the percentage rates in costing sheet for material standard costing and assigned the origin groups to the credits of costing sheet. But after running the cost estimate overhead is not taking into account for standard cost calculation.
    In the define credit entry table key field is valid to date strangly and actually system should allow one than one entry with same valid to date and same sec.Cost element(type-41) for different cost centers.
    But if we without using overhead key and origin group, the entire cost in that supporting cost center will come to all materials (SFG/FG) and we can not distinguish between different product materials(SFG /FG).
    We have checked all things as mentined below.
    Firstly that the correct costing sheet is assigned to the valuation
    variant.
    That the costing sheet is entered for the appropriate material type:
    Finished and semi finished or material components.
    All of the above can be checked and verified via transaction OKKN.
    In addition make sure that the base value maintained is present in the
    costing, for example the base may include an Origin group, is that
    origin group part of the materials being costed?
    Similarly if the base is found and values exist how is the overhead
    rate of the costing sheet set up, is it valid etc.
    And finally do a similar check for the credit.
    we doubt this as a programm error...
    So, request all experts to have ur feedback..

    Dear,
    Check your origin group & material unit of mesaurement is same.
    some time in costing sheet origin group is maintain in different unit & for materail it's maitain in other unit of mesaurement.
    You can see unit of measure for material in Additional data - unit of measure.
    Check BOM component material unit also.
    Check same  unit of measure is maintain in KZS2
    I hope above will useful.
    GOPAN

  • Document splitting not happening in New G/L

    Hi
    I have done all the below settings for document splitting.But still document splitting is not happening for vendor.For example,I am posting  the following entry.
    Using FB60 Tcode
    Cr Vendor 100
    Dr G/L       60   (cost center 1)&(Profit center 1)
    Dr G/L       40   (cost center 2)&(profit center 2)
    when simulating I am expecting vendor entry also to be split and shown as
    Cr Vendor 60  (profit center 1)
    cr vendor  40 (profit center  2)
    Dr   G/L    60
    Dr   G/L   40.
    But it is not spliiting Vendor.It is showing vendor as 100 but splitting the 60&40  to the ZERO balance clearing account( as configured in  ZERO balance clearing account step.)
    why is vendor split not happening/Is there any thing I am missing?
    Config steps done are as below.
    The Steps to follow are:
    1. Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting
    2. Classify Document Types for Document Splitting
    3. Define Zero-Balance Clearing Account 4. Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting
    5.. Activate Document Splitting
    thanks

    Hi thanks all.
    Sorry,I am new to new G/L concept and document splitting.Can you please check my following settings and confirm if they are fine.(I am doing in plain IDES system).
    1.Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting>classify G/L Accounts  for document splitting>>
    I have classified G/L Expenses accounts which I am using under tcode FB60(for simulation of document splitting) with category as 20000 u2013expense.Also I have given Vendor reconciliation account under category 01000-balance sheet account?
    Please clarify how the G/L accounts classified here?
    2. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting> Classify FI document types for splitting.
    Many standard documents are defined.But I thought since I am using FB60 tcode it used doc type KR so mentioned mentioned transaction  as 0300 and variant as 0001 -Vendor invoice
    3. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting>>Define ZERO balance clearing account
    Here standard system has  account key 000(standard account for ZERO balance) with PK40/50  and G/L account for my chart of accounts is mentioned.
    4. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting >>Define splitting characters for G/Lu2019s
    Here I have mentioned Profit center field (ZERO balance ticked)&mandatory field ticked.no other fields defined.
    5. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting >>Edit constants for non assigned processes
    Here I have added my controlling area and left profit center field as blank.
    Please check above settings and suggest me if I am missing any thing?All I am trying to do is post a simple test entry using FB60 and show the document splitting  based on just profit center.
    regards

  • Clearing process in SAP

    Dear Experts,
    I am quiet confused about this clearing process in SAP.
    For example a cash discount in SAP is posted with the following entry
    01 Cust a/c 15000
    40 Cash disc a/c 3000
    50 Sales or revenue a/c 18000.
    The above open item in the customer account is cleared when payment is recieved from the customer. How the G/l and cash discount account are cleared. I know tcode F-03 clears a g/l account manually when there are debit and credit line items which balance to zero . In what cases the above tcode is used?
    Appreciate if you can explain me.
    Rgds
    Komal

    Hello,
    There is no rule that each account needs to open item managed and cleared completely. There are number of accounts, you cannot maintain as open item managed. By default your customer and vendor accounts are created as open item managed.
    If every account cleared completely, then at the end of the year, you will not have any balances in your Trial Balance. In your case, for example the balances like like cash discount and sales will go to your profit and loss account and the profit or less for the financial year will be discovered.
    Let us take your example itself:
    Customer A/c Dr 15000
    Discount A/c Dr   3000
    Sales Account Cr 18000
    Now think that you have received payment from customer
    Bank A/c Dr. 15000
    Customer A/c 15000
    Presuming that you do not have any other transactions for the year.
    Your P&L Account (You have a profit of 15,000 = 18000-3000) have profit of 15000 and which will be moved to Liabilities side of your Balances sheet and against which you have 15000 bank balance.
    Hope this information clarifies your doubts.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • WD Java application translation to japanese not happening

    Hi All,
    I'm working on EP7.0 version and i need to do translation of webdynpro application into japanese.
    I've done the following:
    1.I created a new .xlf file "<>.wdview_ja.xlf" and translated the labels,text,buttons to "ja" characters.
    2.My folder has two xlf files:one default .xlf and other <>_ja.xlf
    3.I rebuild,reload and deploy the application.
    4.I changed the language of browser settings to ja.
    Now following is the issue:
    When the application is deployed,the standalone application shows all the translated texts,but when i access the same application through portal role i do not see the translation.
    I cleared all my browser cache,navigation cache.
    I tried to shut down my laptop and restart, one time it showed the translation but later on when tried to do the same thing translation was not happening.
    I checked the below thread internationalization problem - default language of wd in portal
    I do not exactly follow what needs to be done in my case.
    But when i checked the "current locale" in language resources it still shows "en" eventhough i changed the browser settings to"ja".
    Can anyone please help me out here.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Pradeep

    Pradeep,
    After rebuild, reload and deploy the application. Could you please check these steps once again?
    1.       Whenever you changed .xls view to ja_xls file
    1.1   Is it created Property file of ja_xls?
    2.       While login into portal, you are not able to see Japanese?
    2.1   Is it your Role, Worksets, Page and IView Names converted into Japanese Language?
    2.2   Check the User:- is it Username is changed to Japanese Language?
    Hope these steps helpful for you !!!
    Best Regards
    Vijay Kalluri

  • Reclassification of Debit & Credit balances TC:-FAGLF101 is not happening

    Hi
    We are trying to run the transction FAGLF101 for reclassification of debit and credit balances
    under one company we are have 4 company codes , we are able to post and generate entries for 3 company codes and not happening for one company code alone
    we have checked the setting in OBBU/OBBV/OBBW all are correct, kindly let me know
    1.Is there any particularly settings we have to make on company code basis ,
    2.what all the config in need to check out
    3. any config changes i need to make
    kindly do the needful
    thanks & regards
    salva bindu

    Hello Suresh
    Could you help me with these questions on the configuration of valuation method assigned to valuation area:-
    1. Significance of "determine exchange rate type from act bal" and "determine exchange rate type from invoice reference". How is exchange rate type determined at account balance? Is it that for regrouping of customer / vendor accounts it is required to detrmine exchange rate type from account balance?
    2. What is the significance of valuation area in regrouping? Can i not use the same valuation method mapped to valuation area as configured for foreign currency valuation i.e EVR (standard SAP)?
    3. What are the valuation method settings for US GAAP and IFRS for regrouping?
    Thanks
    Anisha

  • Asset Retirement for Interco Asset, Partner not in SAP

    Hello,
    We need to retire an asset to another affiliate that is not in SAP, that is defined as a customer. In this case, which transaction needs to be used for this asset retirement. F-92 or ABT1N ?
    What would be the difference ?
    Regards,
    Siri.

    Hi Siri,
    If you havent created affiliated company, then you can do it vide F-92.
    The difference is if you do vide ABT1N, you can transfer assets simultaneously you can create new asset in affiliated compnay's books and all balances will be transferred.
    If you do it vide F-92,Your affiliated company has to create assets separately and has to post acquisition entry in their books.
    Hope it is clear.
    Regards,
    G.Sethuraman

Maybe you are looking for