GR Non valuated tick

Dear All,
I had created one PO with multiple account assignment but in that system has not ticked check box for GR non valuated.
But when i am creating the same now system is not allowing to uncheck the GR non valuated check box.
as per standard SAP system will bydefault tick GR non valuated if PO is raised for multiple account assignment but in first case how it has allowed?
is there any settings which is done afterwords due to which this is happening,
please clarify.
reagrds,
umesh

Hi
old PO for multiple account assignment Gr non valuated in unchecked
Did you check the GR accounting document created for this purchase order? If you use multiple acct assignment then no accounting entry will be generated in GR.
As you said no check for GR non-valuated so please check GR accounting entry is there. If there means check PO changes (header/ item) account split is done after GR/IV.
Check IMG - MM - Purchasing - account assignment- Maintain Account Assignment Categories - for account assignment used in PO - GR non-valuated is checked or not.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Purchase order created with gr non valuated ticked

i created a purchase order with gr non valuated ticked but after saving the purchase order the tick on the gr non valuated was removed.Is this a system error or what

OME9 (AAC settings) do not stop you from changing the GR non-valuated to on in a PO even for a valuated material at the plant. The stock accounts in this case will be hit during MIRO.
I checked this cycle in SAP because of the confusing answers on this thread. There is a configuration in OME9, for GR non-valuated firm which does not allow you to remove the tick in a PO, however, this is opposite of what you are trying to do.
The only thing I can think of is a custom validation in your PO. Please check with your ABAPer.

GR non valuated ticker in account assignment category

Dear Experts,
A customer have set up their own account assignment category. In this they have both the "GR non valuated" and "GR non valuated firm" ticker set.
I cannot see that this makes any difference to having only the GR non valuated firm ticker set?
If the "GR non valuated firm" ticker is set, you always have to have GR and also always non vaulated GR
With "GR non vaulated", you have to have non valuated every time to do GR (but it is optional to do GR)
So, if you have set the first, setting the second makes no difference?
Am I right?
rgds
GAR

Hi,
They are completely different setting (for different purpose). Once both indicators are set in OME9 for your related AAC, then when you are maintaining PO with such AAC, the GR-non-valuated indicator will be set defaulted and greyed out (i.e. you can't be able to deactivate). If only GR-non-valuated indicator is set, then this indicator checkbox will be defaulted (but not greyed out) and therefore, you can change if you wish to. Yet, these settings are not relevant to the case of raising multi account assigned PO as in this particular case, SAP will automatically set the GR-non-valuated indicator checkbox regardless of if you have made any settings in OME9.
Cheers,
HT

GR non valuated check box in PO

Dear All,
Our client has created a PO for Asset (Acct Assignment A) and Multiple acct assignment given in item detail.
After making GRN found that Accounting entry is not there.
When checked in PO GR-non valuated check box is checked.
After cancelling GRN and try to save the PO,again tick appears automatically.
When i check the Account assignment in SPRO, GR non valuated check box is not checked.
How to remove GR non valuated tick in PO?
Regards

Venkat,
I wrote the same issue to SAP and sap has confirmed that system will not generate the accounting documents at the time of MIGO for multiple account assignment.
Incase of multiple account assignment category, the Cost proportion will not be appearing at the time of MIGO. It will get updated only at the time of Invoice verification.
Just post the MIRO and then compare the account document at the time of MIRO with the single account assignment and multiple acc.assignmnet PO.Hope it will help.
If you want i can forward that response from SAP to u.
Edited by: Manish Kumar Agarwal on Jun 16, 2009 2:02 PM

In PO screen -GR Non valuated

Dear experts
GR- Non valuated Tick box in u201Cdisable modeu201D in the item level (delivery tab). How can I change as the editable mode ?
And what is the actual purpose?
Regards
Amsi

hi
plz check that If ur using multiple account ssignment for the asset
then this indicator will be in disply mode
plz corect me if i am worng on following statement
in 4.7 version if u select multiple acct assignment then this tick will be there and it will e in didply mode
i think in ECC 6.0 there are some corrections or some settings for this
regards
KI

GR non valuated help

hello to all,
Good day.
I have an issue with GR non valuated being ticked in a PO. I have one user request to have this field unticked. But based on checks done, seems that the PO has already been GR/IR. Can you still proceed with unticking the checkmark for the said GR non valuated field? How? And how do we go about this?
Thanks.

Hi
Generaly we set GR non valuated tick or untick based on account assignment
You need to make setting for Account assignment category under SPRO--> MM --> Purchasing --> Account assignment --> Define account assignment category
Here select account assignment category and in Details u can tick or untick <b>GR non valuated</b> which will be copied while PO creation
Vishal...

Non valuated sales order stock-help reqd

Dear Experts,
My client is into Pipe coating business who receives the pipe from the customers, coats it as per there requirements and dispatches it thereon. There is no concept of FG here as its only the service he is doing on it and also when he receives the pipe there is no raw material cost on it. Raw materials for him would be chemicals etc which he uses to coat the pipe.
This is the case of NON Valuated sales order stock.
1) non valuated GR will be done for customer stock -Only QTY update
2) sales order bom will be created with defined characteristic.
3) Plan cost of sales order will be updated based on Costing ID setting
4)Production order will be created based on Sales order.Good issue and Activity confirmation happen at Production order level but Good received only QTY but no value update.
5)Production order will be settled on sales order.Settlement profile of production order type must contain COST ELEMENT tick under settlement.
6)now my sales order contain actual cost of production.
7)No accounting document will be generated at PGI.
8)only accounting document will be generated at Billing.
9)Only COPA Document will be generated at Sales order settlement. I am going to create PA transfer structure in order to post COGM cost component wise.
Mi missing something?
Question
1) Whether all steps are correct
2) There will be no standard cost release and no variance calculation as well.
3)How can i use RA under non valuated sales order stock?.
4)HOw can i use customer stock under sales order bom with non valuated value?
5)How i will do Production order GR Only qty update?
regards
RK

Hi Raman
All steps are correct.. You seem to be an expert now!
THere wil be no Std cost release or variance calc
You can set up RA based on costs or Revenue... 1st of all check with your client whether they would like to have any WIP in this case
you can receive the customer supplied pipe using 501E movement as Non val
GR - Only Qty Update is controlled by Req Class... You need to leave Valuation field BLanlk in Req CLass and choose Acct Assn Catg E
br, Ajay M

Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

Hello guys,
Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

Hi,
No need to create material as UNBW type.
Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
In the BOM of FG or SFG goto item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
Regards,
Dharma

GR non-valuated box automatically set in backend PO

Hi ...
I am doing extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 system,
When I create a purchase order with multiple account assignments in SRM then the "GR non-valuated" box is set automatically in backend PO when the PO is replicated in SAP. From other SDN threads, I could see that this is a standard design. But couldn't accept that as business might want to have valuated goods receipt with cost distribution.
Are there any solution to fix this issue? Please suggest. Thanks.

Hi
GR Non Valuated indicator comes from account assignment
Please check account assignment configuration
SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Account Assignment>maintain Acc Assignment
Select your Acc Assginment and go to details and check whether the GR Non Valuated is ticked or not
Regards
Trinath

PO Item : Delivery Tab - Goods Receipt and GR Non-Valuated

Dear all,
User highlighted for a PO which she was not able to do GR. When checked, we found that the line item, with account assignment "K" - the Goods Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator is unticked. User further claim that, she did not untick both of these checkbox.
These were the steps which i have done:
1. Checked the config: IMG > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories.
Here i have confirmed that Goods Receipt, GR Non Valuated are already pre selected.
2. Scanned thru the whole list of User Exit found under ME21N. No enhancement related to these two fields were found.
3. Manually create a PO, with similar data in test server -- both the checkbox are pre selected by default.
Given the checking done above: If user did not manually untick the checkbox -- where else / how else can Good Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator be unticked ?
Please .. appreciate it if someone could shed some lights on this area.
Thanks in advance.

Dear All,
Many thanks for the prompt reply.
Siva,
In this case, the PO line item doesn't involve a material number. Therefore PIR is eliminated.
Jurgen,
Yes, i did actually simulate from scratch, the creation of this PO. Both the goods receipt and gr non valuated checkbox were actually ticked. It didn't jive with user's feedback which claim the boxes were originally unticked already.
Sudhir,
Yup, as material number is not involved, therefore PIR and material master is eliminated.
Thru out the day, am quite glad to make some discovery. The PO was actually converted from a PR. And guess what ?
In the PR itself, these two checkbox were already unticked ! I then simulated this scenario - create PR with untick checkbox and convert it to PO. And voila ! in the PO, both checkbox were untick as well.
Now am in the midst of finding out -- why in the PR, at the very first place, goods indicator and gr non valuated are unticked. Checking with the process owner, as the PR was generated automatically.
Thank you very much !

GR non valuated issue not cleared

I want to know which is the userexit or BADI for ME22n for all document type with refernce to Account assignment category "A".
It should CHECK(tick) "GR non-valuated" field under "delivery " of line item.
In our company first PR is created then it is converted to PO, so in this scenario sometimes a setting in SPRO doesn't work, so I have to enable it through userexit or badi...i have tried all the solutions which are posted in SDN.SAP in this link ->
Exit in Me21N
Kindly help me out..
How can I flag EKPO-WEUNB : Checkbox "GR non-valuated".
I am working in 4.7 System.
Moderator message: please use the spell checker and do not use SMS speak when posting, I have corrected it for you this time.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 29, 2010 1:24 PM

Hi Abhishek,
Also, please check the supplier setting in ECC (XK03).
Hope this helps
Cheers,
Yateesh

Non-stock purchase for the non-valuated item

For normal valuated items, if we make it account assigned on PO, it didn't update the inventory on receipt but rather gets charged to the cost object on the PO.
Can we have similar functionality for non-valuated item.
We are having a non-valuated but stock item purchasing scenario. For this we are updating only the quantity of receipt but the value is getting charged to the cost object on PO.
Now user wants to buy same item and charge it to the specific cost object (it's oka upto this point)..AND don't want to update the quanity in inventory.
So in short can we control the no qty. update for the non-valuated item as we can control for valuated item through account-assigned purchasing.

Hi,
But why u need quantity and value both of a material should not be updated ??
Ok...
Create a Material type and go to OMS2 and click Quantity upadating and Value updating in Dialog Structure .Now Check ur valuation Area( example Plant) and do not tick Quantity upadating and Value updating check box.
Now try ur transaction and it will work without affecting quantity and value.
If helpful then reward.
Regards,
Biju K

GR-Non valuated flag is checked when using Order as account assignment Cat

Hi,
We are creating a Purchase Req using a Work order, but under the valutaion tab GR-non Valuated is checked and greyed out so the user can't uncheck it. I want user to select just the Goods Receipt Check but not GR-Non Val.
I already chekced the configuration in OME9 and both are not checked . Also we are not using multiple accout assignment there is only one account assignment element which is that Work order number.
please advice...
thank you!

what is the account assignment category in your PR? if it is coming as checked by default then somebody must have ticked it in SPRO-MM-Pur-account assignment-Maintain Account assignment categories---there select your relevant account assignment category and you will see GR Non Val indicator TICKED, if you don't want it to be dafult in PR , remove it.
But first check why it has been ticked there , it is possible that based on business need all servies / stock purchase under that acnt *** cat need not to be valuated.
Yogesh

GR non-valuated indicator controlled by the Account Assignment Category

Dear Gurus,
In standard customizing, is it possible to do a configuration so that the GR non-valuated indicator in the PO is controlled by the Account Assignment Category. For example:
1. For Acct Assignment Category = A (Asset), the GR non-valuated indicator is disabled (grey out)
2. All other Acct Assignment Categories, the GR non-valuated indicator is enabled (not grey out)
Appreciate your kind feedback.

Which checkbox or radio button specifically ?
It's not the 'GR non-valuated' checkbox or the 'GR non-val binding' checkbox right ?
I can't find any radio button for 'GR non-valuated' so that I can set it to 'display' or 'hide' either.
Perhaps I should elaborate a bit more:
Disabled = Box is grey out = Non Modifiable = Cannot tick even if you wanted to, Cannot untick even if you wanted to
Enabled = Box not grey out = Modifiable = Can tick if you wanted to, Can untick if you wanted to

GR done as Non Valuated Goods Receipt

Hy Gurus,
We have rescently implimented MTO for all our 3 manufactruing plants.Problem is, during the GR of Header Materials we have noticed that GR is done as Non Valuated - there is an automatick tick activated for Goods Receipt, Non Valuated in Goods Reeceipt tab of Process Order.Due to which Accounitng document is not generate and also Problem is occure during Order Sattlement.
Note :- This problem is found only for one Plant not for all 3 plants.
Regards,
sdn Creture

Hy Pravin,
Yes we are using Strategy 20 - Make to order.
Did you want to say that idnicaor is activated incase of MTO orders ? Is it OK?
Becuase some time it actviates automatcially (Valuation done as non valuated Sales order stock with Sattlemetn rule SDI) and some times not (sattelement done with rule MAT).
We have check all the related master data and configue but no solution found.
Regards,
sdn_creature (Jimmy)
Edited by: sdn_creature on Aug 9, 2008 8:13 AM

GR Non valuated tick

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for