GRC 10.0 : BRM (Supress/Enfore fields)

Hi,
We have a requirement at our client to implement a BRM methodology, where "impact analysis" is a mandatory step in the process. For example, if we are creating/changing a business role through BRM, it should enforce a mandatory impact analysis on the business role and end user level, so that we have a complete visibility of all the SOD's that are likely to arise as a result of the new/change business role.Any ideas, around if such a configuration (field level settings) is possible within BRM.

Hello Naiyer,
Well, "impact analysis" is a little bit weird to me. I guess you mean "risk analysis". If I'm right, there's a parameter to set risk analysis mandatory. For my point of view, this is the nicest thing of GRC, you change a role and you're able to know in advance if you're introducing new risks. Check what Simon said here: GRC AC 10.0 Risk Analysis -Risk Terminator Vs BRM-Role Management
and refer to the "Maintaining Configuration Settings in Access Control 10.0" guide at http://service.sap.com/~sapdownload/011000358700000997872011E/AC10_MainConfigSettingSP07.pdf
Cheers,
Diego.

Similar Messages

I have to supress one field named PAYMENT GURANTEE PROCEDURE

hi,
i am trying to supress the field called payment gurantee procedure in CMR through OBD2.
but
unfortunately i am not able to find the field in customer master data in OBD2 in the relevant accoutn group.
help me on this..
regards,
balajit

Hi,
Go to OBD2 tcode and then double click on the Sales Data that is present under the Field Status Section.
Now, under the select Grouop section double click the Billing option.
Then you see the field "Hedging and credit contr. area", in that select the option Supress.
Note to ensure double click the field "Hedging and credit contr. area", you will find the Payment Guarantee Procedure field.
Regards

How to supress blank fields in report ??

Hi all,
           i am trying to build a report which should give only result row infront of each customer..i dont want any keyfigure details..i tried SUPRESS RESULT in CACULATE SINGLE VALUES AS in keyfigure properties but its giving blank fields in place of single values..How do i remove this blank fields..
Any idea pls share..
regards,
Rajendra

hi gill,
          yes the layout is same as u mentioned..
           ROWS   -
COLUMNS
customer-net due date----balance-formula-formula
net due date is used as replacement path variable to calculate other formulae.
if i take out net due date from rows my formulae are not working.
i tried SUPRESS RESULT in CALCULATE SINGLE VALUES AS..its giving only result BUT in place of single values its giving me blank fields..i dont want those blank fields..:-(
regards,
Rajendra

Supress Mandatory field for Service Entry Sheet Creation

Hi,
I am using BDC for Service Entry Sheet creation as BAPI cannot fulfill the Business needs.
During Recording when I click on Service Overview and click on Service Selection we provide the Model Service Specification Number there I can see the Services and select it, but when I select the service and adopt, an error message ocuured to enter the quantity.
Is there any way to supress the standard error message without using acess Key.
BR
Aviram

Hi Aviram,
Messages type 'E' , 'I' or 'W' are controlled through configurations. Please check with your functional consultant with the message number you want to supress. It can be made as 'I' or 'W' through configuration.
Similarly if you do not want that particular field as mandatory field ask functional consultant to make it optional.
Regards
Sachin
Edited by: sachin G patil on Mar 9, 2011 3:13 PM
Edited by: sachin G patil on Mar 9, 2011 3:20 PM

GRC AC 10 (BRM) Risk Analysis Report type is editable

Hi,
In GRC10 – BRM Risk analysis at “Action Level”, “Permission Level”, “Critical Action”, “Critical Permission” and “Critical Role/Profile” is editable.
When i start to create a role in the Risk Analysis step, Permission Level is always selected .Selection is fine as this is configured this way (Parameter in SPRO 1023 -Default Report Type for Risk Analysis). But exist the option to deselect "Permission Level".
As you can Permission level is always selected and not editable?
Regards

Hi,
I guess Cristian mentions attached BRM screen. I have same issue; how to change default values of report type in BRM like parameter 1023 changes in access request.
Also, if we change default value of check box, Cristian can set non-editable fields through SE80.

How to supress the Field in MIRO

Dear All,
There is requirement of our system auditor.In MIRO transaction they want " Invoicing party " in "details tab" to be supressesed .No body from accounts dept.while making invoice verification can enter another vendor in that field as this vendor comes frrom PO by default.
I checked in Customisation also but unable to found this field for making the same to be grey means supress.
Please help and guide me how to make this field supressed.
With Best Regards,
Rajesh

Hi,
when i referred to Screen variant: ZWHATEVER i meant that you have to create one (this means that you´ll be asked to create a transport request).
Once you have created it you justhave to assign this screen variant to the transaction MIRO In SHD0.
Check this:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/67/232037ebf1cc09e10000009b38f889/content.htm
Best regards.
Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Jul 7, 2009 10:17 AM

FCC in reciever File Adapter to supress a field output

Hi All ,
I am doing IDOC to File interface , and i also doinf variable substitution , so in target file structure i have a field called FileName , which is also coming in my output , even though i am not giving the name of the field in the HEADER.fieldNames, anyone please helpp me regarding for this
thanking you
Sridhar

Hi,
remove field FileName from target msg structure............in ID, in reciver file adpater, remove variable substitution and to get the filename dynamically, in revier file adatper, check the option Adpter spcefic msg attributes and in it FileName........then in msg mapping, create a UDF and in it using Dynamic Configuration, set the filename and map this UDF output to a header target node.........
Regards,
Rajeev Gupta
Edited by: RAJEEV GUPTA on Feb 6, 2009 9:40 AM

GRC 10.0: Customizing Reporting with field ID's

Hi everybody,
we need some reports which are delivering some special information. These informations aren't exist in any of the standard reports. So we would like to customize them.
I know there is a customizing table V_GRFNREPCOLUMN how to adjust the available reports and I do it like the instruction:
1) Copy an existing report
2) Check all the technical adjustments
3) change the columns for this report
But there is one problem: The field ID that I need is not available. There are more than 2000 field ID's but not the one that I need. I don't need a custom field because the information is still excisting in the data dictionary. I know the SAP table and the field ID.
For example:
We need a list/report where you could see all the control owners of every organisation. I couldn't found a report and I guess there is no one in the SAP standard. After copying a standard report I couldn't find the right field ID. There is one for owners of subprocess and processes and also one for cross regulation control owners, but not for the e.g SOX control owner.
I try to search in which SAP databse table the information is saved. It is HRP1852. The field ID is (I guess) USERNAME, but this field ID is not available in the customizing of the reports.
So is there a possibility to enlarge the range of the field ID's?
We could programm our own report, but this would be too expansive and I just want to use the possibility of the standard report customizing.
Thanks a lot
Regards Timo

Hi,
I have just checked my SICF settings and found that we have not actually activated those services at all and our NWBC sessions work fine now.
Have you activated the sap/bc/nwbc and sap/bc/webdynpro services?
Also, have you activated the required BC sets for the standard content on Access Controls? This removes the need to do a lot of the basic setups but you still need to follow through the event linkages to check the successful generation etc.
Simon
Edited by: Simon Persin on Sep 21, 2011 5:51 PM

GRC 10.0 - Insert a new field on the RISK/OPPORTUNITY

Hello All,
I have an activity to enhance the component below, to insert a new field on there.
The problem is that I don't know how to make it integrated with the save activity.
Embebbed with this component, I have the componet parent grrm_wd_rnp as shown below:
This component is called by the component POWL_UI_COMP. This screen below shows how this initial screen looks like:
Anybody knows how to implement this? It's confusing working with too many standard components conecting each other.
Regards,
Ricardo

Heinz,
You may investigate logic using UNIONs and a manual tabular form.
Something like:
--get all records above new row
select apex_item... column1
,apex_item... column2
from yourtable
where <logic to limit rows above new record>
union
--get the new row
select apex_item... column1
,apex_item... column2
from dual
where :REQUEST = 'ADDROW'
union
--get every row not in the top query
select apex_item... column1
,apex_item... column2
from yourtable
where <logic to pull all records not pulled above new record>
For this to work you'll need to add your own "Add Row" button and associate it with a branch. Notice the select between the two unions in the above query is a select against dual. This will be your new record when pressing your "Add Row" button (:REQUEST = 'ADDROW').
The following how-to link is a reference for some of the logic you'll need when creating a manual tabular form.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/howtos/tabular_form.html#MANUAL
Good Luck,
Todd

I want to make a field supress in sales order level

hi,
i want to supress a field in sales order for eg: requested delivery date.
where should i go and do it.
regards,

Hi Balaji,
There are two ways.
1)By using SHD0 T.Code.I am not going to discuss this as it is explained in the previous posts.Or you can search in the forum also.
2)By using SE51 T.code.
Goto SE51.
Enter the program name as "SAPMV45A" and screen number as "4440".
Select the layout editor.
Click on Change.
Double click on Req.Delivery Date filed.Attributes screen will be opened.
In that screen goto Display tab.Select the check box Invisible.
Save.
For this also you can take assistance from your ABAPer.
Among these two the first one is very easy and advisable.
Regards,
Krishna.

Hiding fields in contract management SRM.

Hi,
How can we hide fields in the item data in the process contracts.
the fields that i need to hide are:
product type
vendor number.
Can we achieve it without using the BADI ???
Thanks,
Pradeep.
Edited by: Pradeep Purushottam on Apr 22, 2008 11:28 AM

Hi,
Try the following steps.
1. Create implementation for BADI: BBP_UI_CONTROL_BADI
2. Filter: BUS2000113
3. Method: BBP_CTR_UI_CTRL
4. Here is a sample coding to supress Incoterms field in browser
if iv_fieldname = 'BBPS_CTR_UI_ITEM-INCOTERM_KEY' or
     iv_fieldname = 'BBPS_CTR_UI_ITEM-INCOTERM_LOC'.
     cv_invisible = 'X'.
     cv_input_ready = ''.
endif.
5. Comment ( ) the incoterm field in respective ITS template.
6. Publish the template.
The fields will be hidden.
Cheers, Renga
Award Points for usefull answers *

Supress some fiels in sales order? user exit?

can somebody help me regarding this. i want to supress some fields in a standard sales order. i dont want to delete . i just   want to supress some fields in a standard sales order. is there a user exit for it? if yes   do tell me which user exit is it and how to use it?

hi,
To make optional / mandatory you can use in IMG - S&D-> Basic > Functions-> Log of incomplete Procedures => select the fields > from the tables and the system will check for them (OVA2/VUA2)
To make a filed entry enabled or grey (non-entry allowed):
User exits in the program MV45AFZZ-USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION
This user exit can be used to modify the attributes of the screen fields.
To do this, the screen fields are allocated to so-called modification groups 1 - 4 and can be edited together during a modification in ABAP.
If a field has no field name, it cannot be allocated to a group. The usage of the field groups (modification group 1-4) is as follows:
Modification group 1: Automatic modification with transaction MFAW
Modification group 2: It contains 'LOO' for step loop fields
Modification group 3: For modifications which depend on check tables or on other fixed information
Modification group 4: is not used
The FORM routine is called up for every field of a screen. If you require changes to be made, you must make them in this user exit. This FORM routine is called up by the module FELDAUSWAHL.
Actually suppressing fielding sales orders userwise is quite easy. We are doing it in our company. For this we use userexit FORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION in MV45AFZZ.
Below is the sample code
IF SCREEN-NAME = 'VBKD-ABSSC'.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'ZMV45AFZZ' ID 'SCRFNAME' FIELD SCREEN-NAME.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
    SCREEN-INPUT = 1.
else.
    SCREEN-INPUT = 0.
ENDIF.
endif.
You place the authority check object in authorization profile in the role of the users, who should have access to the field (in this case it is VBKD-ABSSC), and there assign the corresponding fields that are to be accessed via this userexit.
pls reward points if the answer is helpful
REgards,
Murali

Unable to define connector for multiple backend systems in BRM

Hi,
I am on GRCFND_A V.11 and SP04
I have multiple backend systems integrated with GRC box. So far I was using one backend connector as default one for role maintenance but it is not feasible if you have to create roles in variuos backend connected systems. I know one way to do so, i can keep changing the default connectors whenever i need to create roles but that is obviously not at all the onw any one would like to go with.
So, I tried to create unique connector groups for every individul backend connectors. But the issue is, the moment i assign the backend connector to the respective connector groups, the same gets reflected to other connector groups as well. So, whenever i either add or delete some of the connectors to any connector groups it gets modified/changed from all of the connector groups.
These are the backend connectors where i have to create roles from BRM whenever needed.
These are the connector groups:
I followed to the ink: GRC AC 10 BRM: Default Connectors with Multiple Back-end R/3 Systems , which is the same as mine issue, but not able to come to the solution point.
would appreciate for your quick response.
Thanks,
Ameet

Could anyone suggest solution to the above mentioned issue please?

Blob dictates duplicate items in details section-based on supression

I was orginally having issues with my supression on this. I think I have it figured out. But..
I have parts that I request that sometimes have drawing with them. I created a table in Access with 3 columns - number, .bitmap., nameof drawing
I brought this table in. I place 1 drawing in the reports and this changes based upon the Paramter{drawing.id} that I have beeing selected. The problem is that I get duplicate fields produced in my details section. Now the blob sits in my report footer C. Can anyone suggest why or help with why my data is duplicating in my details section?
all items in my details section are duplicating
here is my sql if it helps:
max40385
SELECT "PR"."PRNUM", "COMPANIES"."NAME",
"COMPANIES"."ADDRESS1", "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS2",
"COMPANIES"."ADDRESS3", "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS4",
"COMPANIES"."PHONE", "COMPANIES"."FAX", "PR"."SHIPTOATTN",
"COMPANIES_1"."NAME", "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS1",
"COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS2", "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS3",
"COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS4", "PR"."ISSUEDATE", "PR"."CONTACT",
"PR"."REQUIREDDATE", "PRLINE"."ITEMNUM", "PRLINE"."ORDERUNIT",
"PRLINE"."ORDERQTY", "PRLINE"."DESCRIPTION",
"PRLINE"."UNITCOST", "PRLINE"."LINECOST",
"PRLINE"."PONUM", "LONGDESCRIPTION"."LDTEXT"
FROM   "MAXIMO"."PR" "PR", "MAXIMO"."COMPANIES" "COMPANIES",
"MAXIMO"."COMPANIES" "COMPANIES_1", "MAXIMO"."PRLINE"
"PRLINE", "MAXIMO"."LONGDESCRIPTION" "LONGDESCRIPTION"
WHERE ("PR"."VENDOR"="COMPANIES"."COMPANY") AND ("PR"."SHIPTO"="COMPANIES_1"."COMPANY") AND ("PR"."PRNUM"="PRLINE"."PRNUM") AND ("PRLINE"."LDKEY"="LONGDESCRIPTION"."LDKEY" ) AND "PR"."PRNUM"='25334'
C:\Documents and Settings\kpowell\My Documents\Drawings.mdb
SELECT `Parts_Drawings`.`ID`
FROM   `Parts Drawings` `Parts_Drawings`
Edit here-
Ok - I have 3 parameters
1- sets pr field ={?pr.num}
2.- mandatory answer determines a supress on fields(blob, and section blob is in) - supress statment is   - {?yes/no}=no - for both areas
the parameter is {?yes/no}
3. sets up the blob to put into the document base upon a field in the table
that I made in access (based upon column 1 in acces table) - user makese selection based upon yes or no above if no then just leave it as ......
The wired thing is when I have multiple line items in my Pr (purchase request)
if I included a drawing there are no duplicate details
If I dont include the blob (meaning I supress it based upon the answer in my parameter - all items in the details section duplicate ( i suppress these if duplicated but it leaves huge gaps in my report.... any help would be great!
Ok i figured it out. In my access table i created the 1st entry and left the bitmap entry empty and put a descrition of not needed. I selected this as my drawing in my 3rd parameter and it satifies the report as thinking it has a drawing in it even though there is not. So all my duplicate line item in my details section disappear. thanks all
Edited by: max274 on Mar 27, 2009 4:21 PM
Edited by: max274 on Mar 27, 2009 4:29 PM
Edited by: max274 on Mar 27, 2009 6:29 PM

I found the answer see my previous post in this.

PO no. field is mandatory PO, purchaser has to create a Down Payment Reques

Hi Guyas
whenever an advance is to be released against a
PO, purchaser has to create a Down Payment Request through t. code F-47.
Right now, PO no. field is not mandatory & system allows users to create
a down payment request due to which same cost isn't getting reflected in
the project structure report as well as in the PO history.
Please help me
JK

Hi,
I got your issue.
You are trying to create a down payment request for an asset PO.
As a standard behaviour of the system, it always allows you to create down payment requests without PO reference also.
If you make the field status mandatory for the PO number field for field status group used in your alternative recon GL account of vendors, then you cannot create further down payment requests without a PO reference.
One more issue is that, if you do a down payment req for a asset PO, then the asset used in that PO will be capitalised also during F-48, if u do F-48 with reference to F-47 DP request. But most the companies does not want the asset to be capitalised at the Down payment level.
So i have a solution to fix this issue. Which will post down pay req and down payments as like for normal POs.
First find the field status groups, which are used in your alternative recon accounts of spl GL indicator F and A.
Then go to OBC4, and choose those field status groups and go to asset accounting part and supress and fields ASSET NO and Sub number.
Then go to OBA5, enter message class as F5 and enter
There add an entry for message number 378 and change the message type as W.
Now do F-47. It will now be posted as like normal POs only. And the F-48 also will be fine.
This will completely resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu
SRB_ASSETPO

GRC 10.0 : BRM (Supress/Enfore fields)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for