GRN ISSUE
Dear Gurus,
while GRN we have condition type WE01 before 1/11/2011 and on 3/11/2011 i change the condition type to WE03.
now my client are taking GRN,which PO's are created before 3/11/2011.In MB03, messages it is showing WE01 only.
can anyone plz explain why the GRN is not showing WE03.Did i miss any config??
thx in adv.............
Dear Padmasri,
I have created cond type everythg for WE03.now we are using WE03 only.it is working fine.
but what ever PO we have created old date , it is showing WE01.
Is ther any poss to do WE03 for old dated PO??
thx in adv....
Similar Messages
-
Hi,
We are facing an issue while doing the GRN(goods receipt note) against PO as "NO Data available Message no WRF_CONS010".
And for same case when we are trying to do the inward in other client, we are able to do inwarding.
Kindly suggest what to do!!
Thanks & Regards
Ritesh KumarEvery fresher is welcome, no doubt.
But you have to understand that SCN is not meant as a replacement for class room training.
And SCN is not your free of charge 1st level support either.
It is part of the forum rules that anybody has to search for an answer before posting a question
It was discussed several hundred times in SDN and SCN that it is important to search before posting. And this is activity which can even be achieved by newbies.
Read the Moderator spotlight blogs, read the Member of the Month blogs, almost all are expressing the same thoughts and said that they watched for many months before they posted the first time.
The part you made bold is just not understandable, try to read this question as if you see it the first time, do you really think that anybody is able to know what is meant. Except that everybody who has a basic training can know that VF02 is not a transaction to display accounting documents. Instead of putting everything into one sentence you should try to explain more clearer what you did and what you expect and what your question is.
Read this wonderful post, it explains it what is expected from everybody before posting:
Asking Good Questions in the SCN Discussion Spaces will help you get Good Answers
If someone still has doubts, here a few links where this was all discussed before:
IMPORTANT information regarding posting in this forum - please READ
Abuse Reports rejected without any reason
How to overcome a cultural or a knowledge gap
Endless thanks...
Posting links and the jungle you end up in..
Reporting Abuse.. are duplicate answers abuse...
Thoughts from a Forum Moderator
Dear Newbie - Welcome in SCN MM space
Landing page for the troublemakers -
WM- Production order GRN issue
Hi WM Gurus
i done goods isuue (261 movement type) TR, TO .After production completed i want to GRN..
i want to move the goods from storage type from 100 storage type to 916 storage type.
process is GRN from from production to FG storage location
with regards
dineshhi friend
thanks for your support
i have a confusion when do the GRN for purchase order iam using 101 movement type ..in the production
I do 261 movement type and do 101 movement using MB31. But 101 same movement type doing for GRN
Why is neccesary 801 movement type for production GRN. When i use 801 movementype
with regards
dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Jun 10, 2011 8:20 AM -
Hi Experts
We are facing an issue with regard to GRN reversal for a purchase order.
When we try to DO a GRN reversal the system message states " no suitable item found" .
The Po has multiple line items and Goods receipt Document for the line item for which we are trying to do reversal is created . Also we find that their is a confirmation control key "shipping notification" associated with this line item . Their are no inbound delivery details for this line item.
The Vendor master does have a confirmation control key in the purchasing data view but this was updated in vendor master after GRN date for the line item
Please suggest/advice how confirmation control key was activated for the line item in the Po whose GRN was already done
and now when we are trying to reverse it the system doesnot allow due confirmation control key activated in the line item
ThanksCheck it
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/explain-about-the-po-confirmation-control-key-in-detail.htm -
Free Issue - condition in purchasing pricing & GRN - IS-Retail
I am having following scenario in IS-Retail.
Whenever my client is purchasing articles, he is getting some free issue materials also from vendor alongwith actual po qty.
Say, if he is ordering 100 Boxes of Tiles, he is getting 10 boxes free from vendor. So total qty is 110 Boxes against PO qty 100 Boxes.
Stock needs to be updated thru' GRN as 110 Boxes whereas value need to be considered for 100 Boxes in same PO.
Client is not ready to go for "FREE ISSUE" PO for this qty 10 Boxes ( Free issue from vendor ) and he wants to track it in the same/actual PO.
How to handle this in IS-Retail in calculation Schema/Pricing Procedure?Hi,
Go to SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Discount in Kind (Discount in Form of Bonus Goods) > Perform following steps;
Maintain Discount-in-Kind Dependencies (Cond. Table)
> Field Catalog
> Create Free Goods Tables
> Display Free Goods Tables
Define Access Sequence And Discount-in-Kind Types
> Maintain Access Sequence
> Define Free Goods Types
Define And Assign Discount-in-Kind Schema
> Maintain Free Goods Schema
> Determine Free Goods Schema
XK02 - Under "Purchasing" Data of Vendor, activate "Grant discount in kind" field.
MM02 - Under "Purchasing" view of Material, specify indicator "2" for field "Qual.f.FreeGoodsDis."
Now Go to Purchase Info Record (ME11/ME12), under "Conditions" Tab, click on "Free Goods" Button (Ctrl+F1), and click on "EXCLUSIVE" button and maintain condition record for material, if Qty is 100 then 10 is fre of same material.
Now create PO for 100 qty, it will add a new line item of additional 10 qty auto with free indicator. -
RE:Invoice & GRN mismatch issue
Hi All,
one of my user is facing an issue with regards to Invoices not being allocated to the right GRNu2019s. This causes some invoices to be paid without approval, and other invoices that have been approved to be blocked for payment.
for ex:
We have a order of a quantity of 100
We receive an invoice (qty 10) this is posted
We complete the GRN (qty 10)
This should release for payment but unfortunately just prior to the bacs run and running MRBR to unblock any invoices we post another invoice for a qty of 10.
Now the total GRN and Inv values mismatch and no invoices will be paidu2026..
The cycle goes on and on and more invoices are blocked for payment, even though some GRNu2019s are completed.
is there any way we can apply a fix to force those invoices that match a GRN be approved for payment even if the totalu2019s donu2019t match (so the matches will occur line by line and not from the totals)?
ThanksMake sure you use goods receipt based invoice verification (set GRbasedIV flag in vendor master)
-
GOODS ISSUE AGAINST GRN NO.
Hello
Can we do Goods Issue against the GRN No. ???
Regards
Jay
Moderator message: locked because of violating forum rules - please read the rules before posting. Subject must not be in capital letters only
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Feb 22, 2012 3:31 PMHi,
No you can not do a goods issue against a GRN.
Goods iisue will be done against a account assignment like order, cost center, scrap, delivery etc .
Regards, -
Hi all,
One issue is there in the GRN print, suppose we have 4 GRN against a single PO. so how to calculate the freight, other charges and Insurance value as proportionate value for all GRN equally. Because on every print of GRN we are getting addition of all GRN against a PO. Printout of the same is attached.
Kindly suggest.
Regards
JaiHi all,
One issue is there in the GRN print, suppose we have 4 GRN against a single PO. so how to calculate the freight, other charges and Insurance value as proportionate value for all GRN equally. Because on every print of GRN we are getting addition of all GRN against a PO. Printout of the same is attached.
Kindly suggest.
Regards
Jai -
Issue with GRN..
Hi SAP Experts ,
There is a Scenerion at the clients site...where in user has created a GRN for 2 line items
Line item 1 , 8 pieces , Quantity in delivery note Maintained against line item 16
line item 2 , 8 pieces
later line item was canceeled by cancelling GRN.
Issue is Second line iten is not Getting cancelled..
it's a Asset P.O , *Quantity in delivery note in P.O Is zero against Asset it shows..*
Thanks and Regards
AdarshCheck in MB51 for cancel doc. Also check stock
Have u used Migo--cancellation.. -
Printing issue of grn document
Hi,
all the setting for print out of grn had been done ,spool request is also generating, but in mb90
after entering required data
i.e out type,t med,s order-01,p mode-1,mat doc yr-2009,
system give green message-no messages for initial processing exist.
thnx.Hi Amit ,
As per ur query , the messages were already processed.
If you wish to view the same, enter the processing mode as 2.
Hope it works.
Regards
Ramesh Ch -
GRN , Sales Return ,Issue ...
Dear Sir,
i am Facing the following Problem please give me the solution i am waiting for your reply.
I give you one Example.
In one Purchase order 100 items is there, but when GRN come for only One items . so i go to GRN and select the party and copy the data from Open Purchase Order at that time i will get 100 items in GRN now i delete the 99 Items from Grn And than add the GRn this is the Not right way to do this Please suggest me.
Regards
mangesh PagdhareHi Mangesh Pagdhare,
In this case you need not have to copy all data ie., all 100 items in to GR(PO), You go to GR(PO) Screen select the vendor, say copy from purchase orders, You will get Draw Document wizard, here you select Customize radio button and click next. You will get the list of all Items which are in Purchase Oder Screen, Here you can selet the Item which you want to copy into GR(PO). So Select the Item which you wanted in GR(PO) screen and Click Finish.
This will copy only those Item which You wanted in GR(PO) Screen.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Srikanth. -
Hello Gurus,
We have a issue on posting of MIGO. User have wrongly posted many PO's like below
Users have posted MIGO entry like below
Correct calculation
Quantity rate Calculation
41500 295 = 41500*295/1000=12242.50
Wrongly calculated in SAP
System calculated with 41500*295 = 122425000 instead of 12242.50 its happened because of selecting price unit as 1 while posting purchase order instead of entering 1000 as price unit.
If we change price unit as 1000 and post MIGO its posting correctly.
We can reverse the GR, But the problem is user has posted for more than 400 POS's for the same way.
Any input from your end in this regard will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
ShanthiHi,
I would not go for a manual adjustment of stock accounts.
If material are still in stock, you should reverse movement, correct PO and repost (using LSMW). That would be the best.
In any case, I guess you need to correct the price unit in the PO to get a correct invoice.
If material are already consumed and you cannot reverse the consumption:
- if they are valuated at standard price, you can decide to wait for the invoice to come before period end closing .This will trigger a variance due to GR/IR difference that will offset the variances you got when posting the good issue. You would have to allow such variance for these specific invoices.
- if invoice is not there at month end closing you can post a correction journal against a manual variance account and a manual GR/IR account, and reverse it the next month (until invoice is created).
- if they are valuated at moving average price, you can decide to wait for the invoice to come before period end closing . there should be no stock coverage and therefore the variance will be post in PL account that will offset the variance caused in the production. You would have to allow such variance for these specific invoices.
- if invoice is not there at month end closing you can post a correction journal against a manual variance account and a manual GR/IR account, and reverse it the next month (until invoice is created).
Not easy but in that way you don't mess with automatic accounts and you document the corrections.
Regards
Ali -
Issue with MB51 - Value in Amount in LC column- Reg
Dear ALL,
I have an issue from Materia Ledger - while executing the report MB51 to view the material document with relevant to MIGO process (GRN with movement type 101), it has been noticed that some items it is picking up the value in amount in LC column and for some items it is NOT picking up the value, for this client Material Ledger is activated, please share your views on the subject..
Thanks & Regards
RambabuHI
check there if any FI document created or not for your material document for which you are not getting value
I think there will not there will not any FI document and check you have storage location tab on where tab in MIGO
if no storage location tab then its consumption
Regards
Kailas Ugale -
Dear Gurus,
After I Made GRIR Clearing In F.13. still Both the GRN & MIRO Entry showing as a Open Items In FBL3N.
post automatically option is ticked in GR/IR clearing accounts in GL master data.
Kindly help me to resolve this issue. Many thanks.
Regards,
SidduHi,
Your invoices might not be getting due to minor differences. In this case you are requested to do following configuration for Define Tolerance Groups for G/L Accounts
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> General Ledger Accounting (New) --> Business Transactions --> Open Item Clearing -> Clearing Differences --> Define Tolerance Groups for G/L Accounts
After configuration of Tolerance Groups for G/L Accounts assign same in G/L master.
Once it has been assign, tick on Include tolerances while executing F.13
Hope, this solves your issue else revert.
Regards,
Tejas -
Hi Gurus,
I am doing a PO, say 36000rs for 100 KG materials with a tax amount of 720 rs. So while doing GRN, the accounting document will be as, Material account 36720rs debit and GR/IR account 36720rs credit. While doing invoice, i am changing the Tax code (which is 0%). Normally the accounting document should be as, 36000rs to vendor account, 36720rs to GR/IR Account and balance 720rs to material account. But this 720rs is going to two accounts. i.e 560rs to Material account and 160rs to Cost difference account. Why is it happening like this. No other issues are there in Calculation schema or condition types. Can anyone help me out.
Thanks and regards,
RPaccntg key is sued to guide amount to a specific g/l accnt like FR1 is anaccntng ket fr freight condition
NVV is for non deductible tax dstribution.
i think this is a case of price variance with Mov avg px
if the stock coverage is for only part of inv qty then system distributes the price diff to stock accnt and price diff accnt
what was ur stock qty at the time of invoicing? , it will be less than 100
Maybe you are looking for
-
When I set up my user account last year when I got this computer, I am pretty sure I remember a shortname being filled in or suggested to me, and it had an uppercase character for its first letter. So, my short name is "Name" -- except, you know, ins
-
Supported versions of JDBC driver?
Does anyone know what JDBC drivers are considered supported and which ones are considered EOL? With the release of 4.0 is 3.0 now considered EOL? How about 2.0? I tried looking at the Microsoft Product Lifecycle site, but it doesn't have anything fo
-
Hello, while trying to deploy the JRA on the 6.30 server, I encounter a version error. For the deployment of the JRA I followed the instructions in the help section of the Developer Studio. As the server did not come with the JRA installed, I copied
-
HT1338 no flash player on youtube?
Can't seem to download adobe flash player to allow videos on you tube..tried a few times, but no luck..any ideas?
-
Out of Office on OWA; Exchange 2010
We recently migrated from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 and were having issues with out of office. OOF works fine in outlook but when you try and run it from OWA we get internal server error 500. The OOF URL was pointing to the internal machine and