GRN issue against PO

Hi,
We are facing an issue while doing the GRN(goods receipt note) against PO as "NO Data available Message no WRF_CONS010".
And for same case when we are trying to do the inward in other client, we are able to do inwarding.
Kindly suggest what to do!!
Thanks & Regards
Ritesh Kumar

Every fresher is welcome, no doubt.
But you have to understand that SCN is not meant as a replacement for class room training.
And SCN is not your free of charge 1st level support either.
It is part of the forum rules that anybody has to search for an answer before posting a question
It was discussed several hundred times in SDN and SCN that it is important to search before posting. And this is activity which can even be achieved by newbies.
Read the Moderator spotlight blogs, read the Member of the Month blogs, almost all are expressing the same thoughts and said that they watched for many months before they posted the first time.
The part you made bold is just not understandable, try to read this question as if you see it the first time, do you really think that anybody is able to know what is meant. Except that everybody who has a basic training can know that VF02 is not a transaction to display accounting documents. Instead of putting everything into one sentence you should try to explain more clearer what you did and what you expect and what your question is.
Read this wonderful post, it explains it what is expected from everybody before posting:
Asking Good Questions in the SCN Discussion Spaces will help you get Good Answers
If someone still has doubts, here a few links where this was all discussed before:
IMPORTANT information regarding posting in this forum - please READ
Abuse Reports rejected without any reason
How to overcome a cultural or a knowledge gap
Endless thanks...
Posting links and the jungle you end up in..
Reporting Abuse.. are duplicate answers abuse...
Thoughts from a Forum Moderator
Dear Newbie - Welcome in SCN MM space
Landing page for the troublemakers

Similar Messages

  • GOODS ISSUE AGAINST GRN NO.

    Hello
    Can we do Goods Issue against the GRN No. ???
    Regards
    Jay
    Moderator message: locked because of violating forum rules - please read the rules before posting. Subject must not be in capital letters only
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Feb 22, 2012 3:31 PM

    Hi,
    No you can not do a goods issue against a GRN.
    Goods iisue will be done against a account assignment like order, cost center, scrap, delivery etc .
    Regards,

  • How to restrict reversal of Goods issue against production order.

    Dear All,
    How to restrict reversal of Goods issue against production order if production order status is CNF or DLV.
    i want that user can not reverse the goods issued against production order, if they want to do so, then user has to reverse the GRN and reverse the GI then only.
    Please suggest the solution.
    Regards,
    Sandeep Dhruve

    Hy Sandeep,
    You have to use User Exit for this.
    The following enhancement is available for production orders:
    o   CCOWB001    User exit for modifying menu entries
    You can use this function module to deactivate menu entries or
    functions. The locked functions can then no longer be executed by the
    user.
    The enhancement CCOWB001 contains the following components:
    Function exit
    o   EXIT_SAPLCOWB_001   Good movement: Deaktivate functions
          Display documentation
    Regards,
    Dhaval
    Edited by: Dhaval Choksi on Aug 22, 2008 3:01 PM

  • Report for Material Issued against Service Orders But not Billed.

    Hi Experts,
    For CRM Service Orders Based on the Reservation number generated in CRM we will make the Goods issue document in ECC.
    My Question In CRM Do we have any standard report to see Material issued against CRM Service orders but not billed. i.e. Work in progress.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Abhinesh

    Hi Vivek,
    What I wanted to say that you won't get information from VAV about billing since as far as I know it doesn't contain any relevant table.
    You should try create a query using LIKP-LIPS-(joint type: left outer)-VBRK. This will connect deliveries to billing document, you can also get SO number. Please try this.
    (Sorrowully I don't know which logical database would be good for you)
    BR
    Csaba

  • PO number and material issued against this PO for subcontracting

    How to know the link in between the PO number and material issued against this PO for subcontracting.
    I have checked that PO history is not getting updated.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    We have 2 different scenarios where you can post a goods issue to Subcontract Venodrs.
    Scenarios 1: You can post the goods issue against a subcontrac vendor with out referencing the Subcon PO from ME2O, at this stage we will be knowing what is the stock at subcontract vendor but we will not be knowing the issues against which and how much Quantities are posted.
    So when we are post goods receipt, then we will come to know the consuption quantities.
    Scenario: 2, If we use the delivery concept then we can track the goods issues against the subcon POs.
    If you really keen to track the material issued to Subcon vendor against a PO so better use with delivery.
    Thansk,
    Satya.

  • Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

    Hello gurus,
    We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
    I will explain the business requirement.
    - We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
    - This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
    - Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed.  For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this.  This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit".  This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
    - During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
    Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue.  We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
    Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
    Thanks in advance

    Hi RJ,
    First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
    AS - IS
                   Business process
              From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
    e.g.
    Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
    Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
    Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
    Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
    Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40  Unit
    Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
    1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty  to (60+40) =100 or
    2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
    Pros & Cons
    if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
    if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
    Solution ::
    so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
    Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
    if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
    At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
    Hope this help

  • Dump while doing goods issue against order with movement type 261

    Hi Team,
    We are integrating Asset management process along with the goods issue against the order which is created with a business partner for movement type 261.
    when we try to complete the process the system gives us a dump as described below.
    please look through the dump and advice for the same.
    Short text
        The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.
    What happened?
        The current application program detected a situation which really
        should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was
        triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).
    Error analysis
        Short text of error message:
        System error in the FI/CO interface
        Long text of error message:
         Diagnosis
             Updating of the FI/CO interface was called with object type "MKPF"
             yet the checks were run for object type "AMBU".
         System Response
             Checking and updating must be for the same object type.
         Procedure
             It has to do with a system error from the calling applications.
        Technical information about the message:
        Message class....... "RW"
        Number.............. 103
        Variable 1.......... "MKPF"
        Variable 2.......... "AMBU"
       Variable 3.......... " "
       Variable 4.......... " "
    rigger Location of Runtime Error
       Program                                 SAPLMBWL
       Include                                 LMBWLU21
       Row                                     62
       Module type                             (FUNCTION)
       Module Name                             MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT
    46    IF xmkpf-xabln IS INITIAL.                               "note 434093
    47        CALL FUNCTION 'MB_XAB_NUMBER_GET'.                   "note 434093
    48    ENDIF.                                                   "note 434093
    49
    50 ENHANCEMENT-POINT MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENTS_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLMBWL STATIC.
    51
    52 ENHANCEMENT-POINT MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENTS_02 SPOTS ES_SAPLMBWL.
    53    CALL FUNCTION 'MB_CREATE_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_UT'
    54         EXCEPTIONS
    55           error_message = 4.
    56 *  As soon as we have started to put things into UPDATE TASK, we must
    57 *  ensure that errors definitely terminate the transaction.
    58 *  MESSAGE A is not sufficient because it can be catched from
    59 *  external callers which COMMIT WORK afterwards, resulting in
    60 *  incomplete updates. Read note 385830 for the full story.
    61    IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
    >>>       MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE x NUMBER sy-msgno WITH            "385830
    63                  sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
    64 *     MESSAGE A263.
    65    ENDIF.
    66 * Optische Archivierung
    67 * Spaete Erfassung mit Barcode
    68 * Redesign of barcode handling -> note 780365
    69   PERFORM barcode_update(sapmm07m) USING xmkpf-mblnr
    70                                          xmkpf-mjahr
    71                                          barcode.
    72
    73   MOVE-CORRESPONDING xmkpf TO emkpf.
    74   CALL FUNCTION 'MB_MOVEMENTS_REFRESH'
    75     EXCEPTIONS
    76       error_message = 4.
    77    MOVE-CORRESPONDING xmkpf TO emkpf.
    ource Code Extract
    ine  SourceCde
      32 *    BKPF as well. There is no other way to forward XBLNR to FI as not
      33 *    every document is posted by MB_CREATE -> a new function module in
      34 *    MBWL for transferring the information, called by FI, meant to load
      35 *    the complete function group for all MBxx postings when this isn't
      36 *    required (Performance). Would be the better way to transport the
      37 *    information after switching off MBxx in later release.
      38 *    corresponding IMPORT ... FROM MEMORY ... can be found in
      39 *    AC_DOCUMENT_POST (FORM FI_DOCUMENT_PREPARE (LFACIF5D))
      40      l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'.                                   " 641365
      41      EXPORT xblnr = xblnr_sd TO MEMORY ID l_mem_id.             " 641365
      42    ELSE.                                                        "1245374
      43      l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'.                                   "1245374
      44      FREE MEMORY ID l_mem_id.                                   "1245374
      45    ENDIF.

    Couple of notes are mentioned (385830, 780365 etc) and check whether these notes are applied.  If so, check with the ABAPer and go through the source code corrections explained in the respective notes.
    You may also go through the following notes
    1)  Note 386656 - FBV4: RW103 'System error in the FI/CO interface'
    2)  Note 388316 - RW103 "System error in the FI/CO interface"
    3) Note 543463 - Inconsistent Posting in budgetary ledger and/or RW102/RW103
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Post a good issue against an outbound delivery with movement type 601 K

    Hello,
    according to my business scenario I need to manage the stock of different vendors into the client's location (plant) at storage location level and I need to post the good issue against an outbound delivery to decrease the stock level.
    Since the owner of the goods isn't my client the item is managed only at quantity level (not value) so I'm not interesed in the accounting document.
    To do it I'm using the functionality related to the vendor consignment stock but I'm not able to post the good issue against an outbound delivery using the movemement type 601 and the special stock indicator equal to K.
    In particular I've tried in two different ways:
    - setup the consignment stock indicator (= K) into the sales item category, but when I post the goods issue the system is not able to find out the right vendor
    - to create a stock determination rule instead of the setting previous described, but the system display an error message (Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct L534200770 differs for Cost center (010) ) even if the accouting is not relevant in my scenario
    Can you suggest me how the system has to be setup in order to cover my requirements?
    Thanks in advance,
    Alessandro

    Hi,
    Please clarrify which material type you are using in this scenario? I suggest you to use material type UNBW (no value updation will be there) and create a material master.  Use special stock indicator K. Proceed with 601K to do GI. Hope it works. Thanking you.

  • POST GOODS ISSUE AGAINST RESERVATIONS

    Dear All,
    I want to restrict the goods issue against the manual reservations.
    Logic:At the time of goods issue against the reservation system should check stock in hand(unrestricted stock)-all previous reservations.
    Eg:suppose unrestricted stock is 50kg
    Reservation 1 for 20 kg
    Reservation 2 for 30 kg
    Reservation 3 for 40 kg
    Reservation 4 for 10 kg
    When i do goods issue for Res :3
    System should check Uns Stock(50kg)-Previous Res(20kg+30kg)
    give error message stock insufficient.
    Waiting for the expert comment.
    Kind Regards,
    Sankar T

    Hi
       Let me tell you with that logic reservation works.
    While creating manual reservation, system checks whether material is available on specified date or not. In case material is available then system will allow to reserve the material otherwise not.
        Now take your case, if you have made following reservations
    1) 20 Kg
    2) 30 Kg
    3) 40 Kg
    4) 10 Kg
    This means against each reservation material will always be available for particular reservation (because no one can issue particular material by any other means)
    Now suppose in unrestricted use 50 kg of material is available and you want to issue the material against reservation No 3 then system will issue material from reserved material (Not from the un restricted use)
       This means the logic which you want to use is already applied by SAP in one step before (while creating reservation) so need not to apply same logic once again.
       and if you still want to use this logic , you take a help of ABAPer , he only can help you in this mater
    Reward if helpful

  • Goods Issue against outbound delivery from blocked stock

    Dear All
    I want to do goods issue against outbound delivery created without any reference from blocked stock of my storage location. Is there any way I can achieve this? I know normally SAP allows goods issue from unrestricted stock but my business scenario requires goods issue to be done from blocked stock against outbound delivery.
    Please let me know any solution for this.
    Thanks and Regards
    Satish Kumar

    Hi
    Check this link where similar issue has discussed and its resolved as well. Please try this and update the findings. If possible could you share the background of this strange requirement.
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/1541911
    Thank$

  • Account Detrmination for Goods Issue against Order

    Dear All,
    We have a requirement where goods issued against reservation created through plant maintenance order should hit repairs & maintenance account instead of default account such as consumption stores and spares.
    Can any changes be made in configuration so that the default account can be changed either while saving plant maintenance order or can the default be overwritten when material is issued through MB1A against reservation.
    Useful answers will be rewarded with points
    Regards
    Milind Nair

    Dear
    Your knowldge iam adding the points
    In materail master check the Valuation class 4 digits (ex: 2010)
    is assigned in material master . The same material will be used in many places , this valaution class depends Production created by Fi.
    This same will have assigned in G/L at OBYC t code. Here we assign as automatic posting. The same G/l account has given as automatic posting in G/L t code FS00.
    In obyc has many process example for goods issue it will come as BSX. costing difference PRD.
    your materails type is ERSA these types may bes used many plcaes other than Pm . If clinet interests you can assign valuation class with seperate G/l account for PM
    All the G/L , costing docuemnts will appear while doing migo (mb1a) 261 movements as per your obyc seetings
    Tell requirements with FI/MM

  • ABC Analysis of Planned Consumption(Issue against Reservation).

    Hi Experts,
    Is there any standard report is available for ABC Analysis of Planned Consumption(material issued against Reservation)?
    thx in advance...

    Hi,
    I allready tested with Tcodes such as MC.9 (gives details of total & unplanned consump. not for Planned consump.) & MB51(gives details for only one Mov. Type say either 261 or 262 not possible to do ABC ana. for balance of both)
    Is there any other std report as ABC analysis of planned consp.
    Thx in advance...

  • Invoice no & grn no against PO

    Hi Experts,
      Is there any standrd report in 4.7E in which give the e invoice no & grn no against a PO(line item wist). In me2n, ME2L report, it show the graphical view in POH colome.I want this in list form.
    Regards,
    sp sahu

    Hi
    Table EKBE will give report as per your requirement. please check.
    regards
    Srinivas
    reward if it helps

  • Issues against Internal Order- AUC

    Dear Gurus,
    My client require the following when the goods issued against Internal Order(AUC) (MB1A, Movement Type: 261)
    The system has to post following entry 
    Consumption a/c Dr
    To Assets Under Construction a/c Cr
    How can we do that please help me.
    Reagrds
    Sreenivas.P

    Hi
    Why does the client wants to credit AUC a/c. It should normally be Inventory account.
    Normal scenario is that the costs gets debited to IO and on settling the IO it sits in the AUC asset. Then the AUC settlement is carried out thru AIAB & AIBU to real asset
    Thank You,

  • MM COnsigment stock: Unable to issue against reversation

    dear all ,
    we are trying to prototype a MM consigment stock process.
    we have done the following
    1. Purchase info record is created as consigment
    2. PO is created. while creating the PO, the net price is coming as Zero.
    3. Migo was possble with item category as K and movement type as 101
    4. Created a reversation
    5. finally tried to do a goods issue with special indicator as K
    we are getting error PO has zero price.
    we have tried all known settings and the net price in PO  is still coming as zero.
    kindly let us know where the issue could be . what setting need to be modified.
    regards

    Dear Friend,
    when the matl is in consignment sstores, it is not belongs to company. Vendor is the legal owner of the matls.
    you have to transfer from consignment stores to  company stock using 411-K mvt type( T-code= MB1B).
    *you can not do two transactions at single shot( i.e. both transfer posting and issue a matl against Resevastion)*
    In ur case upto 3rd step is OK.
    then,
    1.0 Transfer the matl to companys stock.
    2.0 Create a reservation against a cost center.
    3.0 issue a matl against ur reservation.
    OR
    **u can issue a matl directly to cost center using mvt 201-K in T- code= MB1A.**
    *By that time if u see the matl do. u wil see that stock changes from 101(K-) to 201(K+), but can not issue against reservation*
    It will solve ur problem.
    If u have any doubts, plse revert back.
    Reward if useful.
    Regards
    Viru

Maybe you are looking for

  • Delivery date in contract

    Dear Friends, Can we maintain one tentative Delivery date in contract? I know contract dont have schedule lines.....and wont transfer any reqirements .....but I need to give  one tentative delivery date ....just for the information to pass to the pro

  • Uploading a csv file through XDB FTP

    Hello I'm developing a project where i need to upload a big amount of data, contained in a CSV file, on the file system of a database server and it would be great if the FTP service provided with XDB could be used to achieve such a job. Does somebody

  • Not applied Patch 5117016 after 10.2.0.2 patch set.

    Hi , database has been upgraded to 10gR2 on solaris 64bit. Patch 5117016 has not been applied after 10.2.0.2 patch set applied. but after that DST patches were applied. here my concern is should i rollback DST patches in order to apply Patch 5117016.

  • Using basicStroke to draw the INSIDE of a polygon

    hello i have a polygon that i want to trace the inside of... using: g2.setStroke( new BasicStroke( 20, //float width, BasicStroke.CAP_SQUARE, //int cap, BasicStroke.JOIN_MITER, 1, new float[] { 12, 12 }, 1 g2.draw( myRect ); this code traces the shap

  • 1200 IOS - Web page not functional/different

    Hi folks, I run into a 1230 that would have a Web page completely different than the usual one. Instead of getting the normal User/pass menu and then the menu on the left side frame, you get this: Cisco Systems Accessing Cisco AIR-AP1220-IOS-UPGRD "1