Group condition calulation error

Hi Gurus
I am facing a problem while applying a group condition as discount at item level. Tried to search in the existing threads but no luck.
We have marked a discount condition as group condition with quantity scales.
Now if there are multiple line items in the sales order for the same material with different quantities, there is a strange system behaviour.
The line item with highest quanity gets the discount calulated with a conditon round diff populated (KOMV-KDIFF) with negative value in the sales order. Now when billing document is created for this sales order the same line item gets the condition round diff (KOMV-KDIFF) populated with positive value. This in turn results a difference in net value of sales order and billing document.
Pls advise what could be the possible cause and solution.
Thanks in advance,
Gaurav

Hi Nikhilesh
Thanks for ur early reply.
Yes there is a 1:1 relationship between sales order and invoice. Example is detailed below:
Line item Material Qty     Amount (GBP)
10           STL       6531   2220.54
20           STL       6770   2301.80
Now in the sales order, when the discount condition YGID is calulated on the above items @ 4.5%, discount value for line # 10 comes to 99.92 and discount value for line # 20 comes to 103.59 with -0.01 value in KOMV-KDIFF field.
Thereafter when billing document is created for this sales order, value in line # 10 for the discount remains same i.e. 99.92 but for line # 20 the discount value comes as 103.58 with +0.01 value in KOMV-KDIFF field.
This results in a difference in net values of sales order and billing document.
Regards
Gaurav

Similar Messages

Scale type D for group conditions

Hi all,
I am creating a new group condition and am trying to make it scale type D - graduated-to-interval scale. However because this is a group condition, SAP is giving me an error (Scale type 'D' cannot be used for group condition 'X').
What is the best solution to this?
I would like to give discounts based on:
Sales quantity:
1-100 = 15% off
101-200 = 25%
201-300 = 35%
301-400 = 45%

Hello
This is b'coz your condition type with active Group condition Indicator. That means, here the system calculates the basis for the scale value from more than one item in the document.
So, the scale D maintain in Scale basis for those condition type, does not go with it and throws an Error.
Thus, if you want to scale functionality for condition type with group condition indicators use GrpCond.routine to maintain routine.
Routine number for creating group key identifies a routine that calculates the basis for the scale value when a group condition occurs in pricing.
For instance.
Check routine 3-Mat.Pricing Group. This is an example of a structure of group key formula. A structure of group key formula can be used to influence the basis the system uses when reading the scale of a group condition. The formula is assigned to a group condition type in customizing.
Formula '3' adds up the quantities / values of all of the line items in the sales document that have the same material pricing group (field KONDM) as the current sales document line item.
A company defines a particular discount (condition type Z001) with scales based on weight. When a sales order line item is priced that is eligible for the Z001 discount, the user would like the system to read the scale with not just the weight of the current line item, but the combined weight of all items in the sales document that have the same material pricing group as the current line item. To accomplish this, the user defines condition type Z001 as a group condition and assigns structure of group key formula '3' to it in customizing.
I hope this assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Group condition summary by Year

Sum({Detail_positive_responses.A8RPositive},{Detail_positive_responses.Survey Date}, "Monthly")
I'm looking to be able to change this summary to Yearly. I tried just typing "Yearly", and Tried "Annually" but get an invalid Group condition error. is there a way to summarize by year?
Thanks much for any insight you can provide.

Hello,
I'd ask in the SQL Server forums over here:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/home
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book:
Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C406F75746C6F6F6B2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

CRM 5.0 IPC Group Condition

Friends,
We have a requirement to implement a group condition in CRM IPC 5.0. We have it implemented in R/3 and it works fine. We have replicated the code in the IPC and it is being hit. The code is quite simple. We copy to subtotal 1 a the net line value if the condition ZDC1 exists on the line. We then want the group basis calculation to only include the totalling of those lines that had ZDC1.
As I mentioned, this works fine in R/3. In CRM it is including the value of all the lines regardless of whether there is a ZDC1 condition or not. The Java code is getting hit and doing the transfer of the value to subtotal 1 at the right time.
Is there something else we should be setting up in the custom fromula for a group condition? I see in the IMG in CRM where I can add formula and implementation attributes. Is this something I need to do to get the group condition to work correctly?
Regards.
KB

We put code in to write the condition out to a log file to ensure that the correct values were being calculated. Once we did this, the condition started working. No clue why.

Urgent ---group by syntax error

This is my syntax as below.But it doesn't work.Does anyone can tell me what's problem ? or it have another way to solve this quuestion? thanks .
sql syntax:
select a.txdate,a.costype,sum(cosamt) * (1+a.cosrate) as costamount
from sales_cost a
where a.txdate between '2003-01-01' and '2003-02-01'
group by a.txdate,a.costype;

Although more specifics might have helped, I am assuming based on the title of the post: "urgent ---group by syntax error" and my test of the original code that I have identified the error. See the example below for how the original code produces a group by error and how the solution I provided executes without error.
SQL> -- test data:
SQL> SELECT * FROM sales_cost
2 /
TXDATE      COSTYPE    COSAMT   COSRATE
03-JAN-03         1         3        .5
03-JAN-03         1         4       .25
03-JAN-03         2         4       .75
04-JAN-03         3         3        .5
04-JAN-03         4         4       .25
04-JAN-03         4         4       .75
6 rows selected.
SQL> --
SQL> --
SQL> -- wrong:
SQL> SELECT   a.txdate, a.costype,
2            SUM (a.cosamt) * (1 + a.cosrate) AS costamount
3 FROM     sales_cost a
4 WHERE    a.txdate BETWEEN '2003-01-01' AND '2003-02-01'
5 GROUP BY a.txdate,a.costype
6 /
         SUM (a.cosamt) * (1 + a.cosrate) AS costamount
ERROR at line 2:
ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
SQL> --
SQL> --
SQL> -- correct:
SQL> SELECT   a.txdate, a.costype,
2            SUM (a.cosamt * (1 + a.cosrate)) AS costamount
3 FROM     sales_cost a
4 WHERE    a.txdate BETWEEN TO_DATE ('2003-01-01', 'YYYY-MM-DD')
5                  AND     TO_DATE ('2003-02-01', 'YYYY-MM-DD')
6 GROUP BY a.txdate,a.costype
7 /
TXDATE      COSTYPE COSTAMOUNT
03-JAN-03         1        9.5
03-JAN-03         2          7
04-JAN-03         3        4.5
04-JAN-03         4         12

Getting "ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression" error in Inline query

Hello all,
The following query when run in SCOTT user gives "ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression" error.
If I remove the TRUNC function from the outer query's group by clause, then it fetches
(My actual query is something similar to the following query. I have given emp, dept tables for convenience's sake)
select e.empno,e.ename, AVG(e.SAL), trunc(e.hiredate),
(select sum(sal) from emp
where hiredate = e.hiredate) salary
from emp e
group by e.DEPTNO,e.EMPNO,e.ENAME, trunc(e.hiredate)
Pls suggest how this error can be avoided.
Regards,
Sam

Why not this?
satyaki>
satyaki>select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    10.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
Elapsed: 00:00:00.02
satyaki>
satyaki>
satyaki>select e.empno,
2         e.ename,
3         AVG(e.SAL),
4         trunc(e.hiredate),
5        (
6           select sum(sal)
7           from emp
8           where hiredate = e.hiredate
9        ) salary
10 from emp e
11 group by e.DEPTNO,
12           e.EMPNO,
13           e.ENAME,
14           e.hiredate;
     EMPNO ENAME      AVG(E.SAL) TRUNC(E.H     SALARY
      7934 MILLER         1887.6 23-JAN-82     5583.6
      7698 Glen             1848 23-JAN-82     5583.6
      7788 SCOTT          598.95 19-APR-87     598.95
      7900 JAMES          1379.4 03-DEC-81    6650.16
      7521 WARD           226.88 22-FEB-81     226.88
      7599 BILLY            4500 10-JUN-09       4500
      2222 sp               1200 14-SEP-09       1200
      7902 FORD          5270.76 03-DEC-81    6650.16
      7566 Smith            1848 23-JAN-82     5583.6
      7654 MARTIN           1815 28-SEP-81       1815
      7839 KING             7260 17-NOV-81       7260
     EMPNO ENAME      AVG(E.SAL) TRUNC(E.H     SALARY
      7844 TURNER           2178 08-SEP-81       2178
      7876 ADAMS          159.72 23-MAY-87     159.72
13 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
satyaki>Regards.
Satyaki De.

Analytical Services failed to get user's parent group tree with Error

Hi,
We have a frequent errror during our weekly batch for an application.
The context:
- Essbase Administration Services we are using is version is 9.3.1.
- 8 applications are calculated during the week-end. The scripts executed are exactly the same for the 8 applications.
- For example let's say that 5 scripts are launched during the night in the batch for each application (script 1, script 2 ... script 5)
- App1 and App2 are launched alone and before the 6 others applications as these applications database are 3 x bigger (App1 is calculated alone, then app2 is calculated alone, then app3 to app8 scripts are launched in the same time).
The issue :
- We don't see any issue for app3 to app8, the calculation are executed without any problem from script1 to script5.
- But we have an error in App1 and App2 log when the bath execute script 4 and we see the following error in the server log **
"Analytical Services failed to get user's parent group tree with Error".
(** : we don't see any log for script 4 in the application log - it's like the server bypass script 4 to go directly from script 3 to script 5 )
Nothing special is done in script 4 but just an aggregation of the Year dimension (using a @SUM(@RELATIVE(Year,0)) calculation.
I think that there is may be a synchronization error with Shared Services but what is strange is that it's always for the same script 4 and the batch is launched at different time every week-end.
Can the issue be linked to the size of the database of applications (8 Gb) and difficulties for the processor to executes aggregation in a large database volume ?

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that the error occurred when sending an email to the user in workflow.
Did you delete the existing Connections before setting NetBiosDomainNamesEnabled?
If not, I recommend to delete and recreate your AD connections, then set NetBiosDomainNamesEnabled to true.
Or you can delete the original User Profile Service Application and create a new one, then set the NetBiosDomainNamesEnabled to true and start the User Profile Service Application
synchronization.
More reference:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18060.sharepoint-20xx-what-if-the-domain-netbios-name-is-different-than-the-fqdn-of-the-domain-with-user-profile.aspx
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Shipment Cost: Group Condition Type calculated on a special weight...

Here is the scenario: A shipment (truck) combines multiple deliveries, grouped on a stage when same destination (happens often).
A condition per LB is to be calculated on the cumulated weight per destination (per stage) BUT not simply on the gross weight, but on the heavier of 2 special weights: the business here uses a special formula according to the packaging, and it gives 2 weights (stored in Z fields of LIKP), an actual weight and a cubic weight.
The purpose is to identify for each delivery the heavier weight and to use cumulated the weight across the deliveries to the same destination to calculate the per CWT cost.
This is my first issue: the condition type is defined at Delivery calculation base, Calculation Type Multi-dimensional, and as a group condition). How do I define to use the cumulated of each delivery heavier weight ? In the Scale for condition type view, I used the scale basis D Gross Weight (which is not right..), there is also a field for a Scale Base Value formula, I wondered if that is what I should use..
My 2d issue: once the cost is calculated, I have to re-distribute it on the deliveries as per the proportion of their heavier weight compared to the total weight used for the calculationShould that be an alternate Condition Base Value formula in the pricing procedure (where xkwert would be.the heavier weight.would that be then a new Z field to be filled in by the user exit determing the heavier value) ??
Thanks a lot, it is a tough one, I know...who is the best ever shipment cost pricing consultant ? !

Hi Guys
Unfortunately I do not think that you will get an answer now. Either your question is not simple or we do not know.
So in the interest of keeping the Forum tidy and easier to surf through could you please close your thread and either try one of the other forums or try another post. I do not think that most people will bother to look this far back anymore.
Sorry I cannot help as I would if I could.
Regards
Frenchy.

Get Delivery date(EKET-EINDT) in MM Pricing routine(group condition)

Hi All,
I have created an MM pricing routine RV65A092 in VOFM. So when creating PO(ME21n), this routine will trigger..
Now the problem is I need EKET-EINDT for grouping condition. It was mentioned to call program SAPLMEPO and get EKET data.
Please help me how to get delivery date in that routine which is filled in Item level during PO creation
Thanks
Ram

Hi Ram,
For SD you have the SAP Note 531835 - Using field PSTYV in the condition access. For MM is simmilar, although you must use the enahncements. Instead use the userexits that note says, use the enhancement LMEKO001 (EXIT_SAPLMEKO_001) to populate fields ZZ in KOMK and LMEKO002 to populate KOMP.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Set up pricing - Group condition doesnt works

Hi Gurus,
Please provide me your inputs.
Can SAP determine the sales price as described in the below two cases.
Case 1:
Sales price for material M1, from 01.01.2011 u2013 31.07.2011
Quantity         Price
0                         100
25      90
100      75
Sales price for material M1, from 01.08.2011 u2013 31.12.9999
Quantity      Price
0      105
25      94
100      78
Sales order (note the difference in pricing date)
Total quantity = 38, second scale should be used
Item      Material      Pricing date      Quantity      Price
10      M1      31.07.2011      17      90
20      M1      31.08.2011      21      94
Many Thanks for your answers
Sharan

Dear Sumanth,
Thanks a lot for your answer. I am relatively new to this subject. Please elaborate your answer for me to maintain the settings in copy control.
The scenario is - New condition type ZPR0 is created with group condition. And the scales are maintained as mentioned in the problem.
Lets say Order is created on date - 23/11/2011 with two lines
Line 1 - Material M1 - Quantity 17 - Pricing date 31.07.2011(Maintained at item level)
Line 2 - Material M1 - Quantity 21 - Pricing date 31.08.2011(Maintained at item level)
With scales maintained, because of the pricing date , system picks up individual scales and it doesnt accumulates the quantity. How to tell system to accumulate quantity and then check scale based on the pricing date.
Thanks for your help again,
Sharan

Use of group conditions in subtotal KZWIW

Hi,
I have a specific trouble in the use of group condition in sales order and billing.
Condition Z001 is a group condition and should also update field kzwi2 as base information for condition Z002
Condition Z002 is not a group condition and is calculated based on informations stored in kzwi2.
When creating a document, the field kzwi2 is not updated directly (because Z001 is a group conditions) and the price should be redeterminated manually in order to allow the document to be considered as complete.
Is there any settings that can avoir the manual recalculation of the price?
Many thanks in advance,
Nathalie Winand

Hi Nathalie:
See Note 1022966 - FAQ for the 'Subto' column (KZWIW) in the pricing procedure
Perhaps it will help you
Regards
Eduardo

Not a group by column error message - cursor sharing

Hi,
Our database is Oracle 11g.
We faced problems about some sql's. These sql's were running in Oracle 10g.
Our sql statements are like the below query:
SELECT COLUMN_A,COLUMN_B,COLUMN_C,
TO_CHAR(OPERATION_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYYY'), CUSTOMER_NAME || '-' || CUSTOMER_SURNAME,
DECODE (IS_MANAGER, 0, ' Manager', 'Employee')
SUM(TOTAL), SUM(AMOUNT), AVG(SALARY),
FROM TABLES
GROUP BY COLUMN_A,COLUMN_B,COLUMN_C,
TO_CHAR(OPERATION_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYYY'), CUSTOMER_NAME || '-' || CUSTOMER_SURNAME,
DECODE (IS_MANAGER, 0, ' Manager', 'Employee')
ORDER BY COLUMN_A,COLUMN_B,COLUMN_C,
TO_CHAR(OPERATION_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYYY'), CUSTOMER_NAME || '-' || CUSTOMER_SURNAME,
DECODE (IS_MANAGER, 0, ' Manager', 'Employee')
When we remove order by or when we disabled cursor sharing, problem is fixed.
I think that sql looks correct. Why we are taking not a group by column error message?
How can we fix this problem without changing querys( we have other reports which gives same error message) or disabling cursor sharing?
Thank you, Bye

Dear,
SELECT   column_a
        ,column_b
        ,column_c
        ,TO_CHAR (operation_date, 'DD/MM/YYYYY')
        ,customer_name || '-' || customer_surname
        ,DECODE (is_manager, 0, ' Manager', 'Employee')
        ,SUM (total)
        ,SUM (amount)
        ,AVG (salary)
    FROM TABLES
GROUP BY column_a,
         column_b,
         column_c,
         TO_CHAR (operation_date, 'DD/MM/YYYYY'),
         customer_name || '-' || customer_surname,
         DECODE (is_manager, 0, ' Manager', 'Employee')
ORDER BY column_a,
         column_b,
         column_c,
         TO_CHAR (operation_date, 'DD/MM/YYYYY'),
         customer_name || '-' || customer_surname,
         DECODE (is_manager, 0, ' Manager', 'Employee')Here you are grouping by
DECODE (is_manager, 0, ' Manager', 'Employee')What does represent the is_manager? it is a function ? it might be that you hit one of the group by restriction such as select are not allowed into the group by clause
Best regards
Mohamed Houri

Regarding group condition

hi friends
1.wht is header condition and group condition?
2. what r the condution types for header and group conditions?
3. give me some examples for useful of header condition and group conditon?
plz reply me
thanks in advance

Dear Venkata Ramana
1) Header Conditions
Header conditions are entered manually in order processing. Automatic pricing does not take header conditions into account; you can not create condition records for them in the standard system. R/3 includes the following header conditions:
- Percent discount (HA00)
- Absolute discount (HB00)
- Freight (HD00)
2) Group Conditions
Please check this help link
[Group Conditions |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/1c/8c8b518d8c11d199a30000e8a5bd28/frameset.htm]
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Group Condition at Header on Scale basis

Hi,
I want to know, how system assign the corresponding condition amount of header to individual item .
in our system
e.g in our system we have condition ZD22 for packainf and forwading charges as fixed amount and scale is qty
i have add Rs 300 at header and in my PO there are 3 item having qty,   100 ,100 and 2500   after adding condition amount at header as 300   when i checked the on individual item i found for first two item it 75.89 each and for third item the amount is 148.22
I want to know how system divides the header amount to individual item if scale is qty.
regards,
zafar

Hi
Kindly note this scenario
Condition value XXXX    180
Marked as Header + Group Condition
PO
Item 1       qty   1           Price 300
Item 2       qty   1           Price 100
Item 3       qty   1           Price 50
Ratio = Based on value =Qty*Value
300:100:50   = 6:2:1
Therefore XXXX distributed to items as   120 , 40,20

Creating Protection Group Fails with Error:360 The operation failed due to a virtual disk service error

Hello
I'm setting up a DPM server (2012 R2) at a remote site; everything goes well with no issues until a protection group is created, at which point I get the following error;
Create protection group: Protection Group 1 failed:
Error 360: The operation failed due to a virtual disk service error
Error details: The system cannot find the file specified
Recommended action: Retry the operation.
The environment is as follows;
- Virtual Machine Running Server 2008 R2 Fully updated
- Storage Pool is an iSCSI connection Thick Provisioned 1TB GPT and shows in Disk Management with no issues.
- Have connected to Session 0 (console)
- Error log shows The provider did not receive a Plug and Play service notification for the volume. volume=10 for the VDS Dynamic Provider
Can Anyone Help?
Thanks
.Adam Langdon

Hi,
Disk defrag is initiated when a volume shrink is attempted. See if there is any problem defragging a volume and correct any problems doing that.
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Regards, Mike J. [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Group condition calulation error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for