Group ownership bug?

Hi there,
I'm having an issue on my OD Master where I have created two test groups and a number of test users in order to enable the Wiki functionality for groups.
Each group has one user assigned limited admin rights.
Each group has the same user assigned as group owner (or is it ownership of the group folder, I'm not quite clear on this)
Using the "All Records" tab in Workgroup Manager I can see that the correct (limited admin) user is set to HomeLocOwner for both groups.
Yet using the Directory application, the "Ownership" tab tells me that the group is owned by diradmin (Directory Administrator).
As a result, logging into the wiki as the groups owner/administrator gives no extra privileges above those of a standard user.
To get "Admin Functions" for the wiki I have to either log in as diradmin or set the users to be moderators in Server Admin/Web which allows them admin rights to all wikis. Not the behaviour I want.
Am I doing something wildly wrong in terms of group ownership?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ryan,
Your modified file worked for me as well and here is what I did:
1. Import the netlist generated by Multisim
2. Place all components from group 3 on the work area
3. Design>>Group Replica
4. Primary Group select Group 3
5. Secondary Group select Group 4
6. Make sure corresponding components from group 3 and 4 are on the same line, in this example D6 and D5 need to be on the same line and also check the other two transistors.
I think your problem is at step 6.
Tien P.
National Instruments

Similar Messages

How to preserve group ownership

I recently created a group called "special", added some users (including myself), and successfully created a directory where all users in the "special" group can read and write. The umasks have been changed from the default 0022 to 0002 in /etc/launchd-user.conf. Here's how I tested this:
$ mkdir myTestDir
$ ls -l | grep myTestDir
drwxrwxr-x   2 tdunlap staff   136 Jul 25 12:13 myTestDir
$ chown :special myTestDir
$ chmod g+s myTestDir
$ ls -l | grep myTestDir
drwxrwxs-x   2 tdunlap special   136 Jul 25 12:13 myTestDir
$ cd myTestDir
$ mkdir my2ndTestDir
$ touch myTestFile.txt
$ ls -l
drwxrwxr-x 2 tdunlap special 68 Jul 25 12:17 my2ndTestDir
-rw-rw-r-- 1 tdunlap special   0 Jul 25 12:17 myTestFile.txt
Here we see the group and appropriate permissions are created when performing tasks on the command line. The same has been confirmed when using Finder and TextEdit.app. But I noticed an issue of the group not being preserved when I use Applications like Chrome.app and Archive Utility.app to download and unzip files, respectively. Here's what happens:
drwx------@ 4 tdunlap staff         136 Jul 25 12:42 802.11
-rw-rw-r--@ 1 tdunlap staff    16833611 Jul 25 12:42 802.11.zip
drwxrwxr-x 2 tdunlap special        68 Jul 25 12:17 my2ndTestDir
-rw-rw-r-- 1 tdunlap special         0 Jul 25 12:17 myTestFile.txt
Notice the zip file I downloaded is saved with my Primary Group ID, not the group ID of the folder. And when I use the Archive Utility.app to unzip, the same thing happens. However, examine what happens when I use unzip from the command line instead of the Archive Utility.app:
$ unzip 802.11.zip
Archive: 802.11.zip
inflating: 802.11-2012.pdf
   creating: __MACOSX/
inflating: __MACOSX/._802.11-2012.pdf
inflating: 802.11v-2011.pdf
inflating: __MACOSX/._802.11v-2011.pdf
$ ls -l
total 95520
-rw-r--r--@ 1 tdunlap special 24739306 May 21 13:54 802.11-2012.pdf
-rw-rw-r--@ 1 tdunlap staff    16833611 Jul 25 12:42 802.11.zip
-rw-r--r--@ 1 tdunlap special   7329554 May 21 13:47 802.11v-2011.pdf
drwxrwxr-x 4 tdunlap special       136 Jul 25 12:40 __MACOSX
drwxrwxr-x 2 tdunlap special        68 Jul 25 12:17 my2ndTestDir
-rw-rw-r-- 1 tdunlap special         0 Jul 25 12:17 myTestFile.txt
Once again it appears that command line tools honor the group ownership, but GUI-based apps do not.
Can anyone suggest how I can ensure attachments downloaded into this directory honor the "special" group instead of saving as "staff"? I prefer not to change the Primary Group ID for each member of the "special" group. I could also run a periodic cron job looking for "staff" group on files and/or directories then performing a chown :special on the offenders. But there must be a better way.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Terry

When you remove querystring , then it displays all the data, so no dynamic filter required. But with Filter it reload the filtered data. That may be the reason for not keeping the states.
You can expand collapse the groups by using javascript code. You can either expand all rows or do some JS trick to store current expanded row state in some hidden control and re-expand them at load through you js code as explained below -
You can find image ID for the collapse-expand image (the '-' image) and can call a SP javascript function (ExpCollGroup()) to collapse/expand and loop it for all row.
$(function(){
ExpCollGroup('id..','img_...');
please check -
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/5935/expand-1st-group-and-collapse-2nd-group-in-list-view
http://alectang.com/blog/archive/2010/09/09/easy-expand-or-collapse-sharepoint-list-in-group-by-view.aspx
Thanks
Ganesh Jat [My Blog |
LinkedIn | Twitter ]
Please click 'Mark As Answer' if a post solves your problem or 'Vote As Helpful' if it was useful.

Group ownership for rdbms files in the diagnostic dest

Hi Gurus,
In my RAC environment I have notices that, group ownership for the files under $ORACLE_BASE/diag/orcl/orcl/ folder is set to ASMADMIN.
Is there any specific reason why oracle does it that way?
Do we have an article id which explains this .
Thanks.

Hi,
Please refer to the following for the same
Advanced Installation Oracle Grid Infrastructure for a Cluster Preinstallation Tasks
2.5.5.1.3 Oracle ASM Groups for Job Role Separation Installations
SYSASM is a new system privilege that enables the separation of the Oracle ASM storage administration privilege from SYSDBA. With Oracle Automatic Storage Management 11g Release 2 (11.2), members of the database OSDBA group are not granted SYSASM privileges, unless the operating system group designated as the OSASM group is the same group designated as the OSDBA group.
Select separate operating system groups as the operating system authentication groups for privileges on Oracle ASM. Before you start OUI, create the following groups and users for Oracle ASM:
The Oracle Automatic Storage Management Group (typically asmadmin)This is a required group. Create this group as a separate group if you want to have separate administration privilege groups for Oracle ASM and Oracle Database administrators. In Oracle documentation, the operating system group whose members are granted privileges is called the OSASM group, and in code examples, where there is a group specifically created to grant this privilege, it is referred to as asmadmin.If you have multiple databases on your system, and use multiple OSDBA groups so that you can provide separate SYSDBA privileges for each database, then you should create a separate OSASM group, and use a separate user from the database users to own the Oracle Grid Infrastructure installation (Oracle Clusterware and Oracle ASM). Oracle ASM can support multiple databases.Members of the OSASM group can use SQL to connect to an Oracle ASM instance as SYSASM using operating system authentication. The SYSASM privileges permit mounting and dismounting disk groups, and other storage administration tasks. SYSASM privileges provide no access privileges on an RDBMS instance.
Regards,
Vandana - Oracle

[svn:fx-trunk] 8287: Group mask bug

Revision: 8287
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-06-25 22:31:24 -0700 (Thu, 25 Jun 2009)
Log Message:
Group mask bug
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-21495 - Setting mask to null for a Group does not remove the mask DisplayObject
Remove the previous mask if it was parented by the Group.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: SDK-21495
Reviewer: Glenn
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-21495
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-21495
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/supportClasses/GroupBase.as

error dateField not selecion date 27/11/2002 ?
This is bug flex 3 ?
thanks

Group ownership of Service Requests

Hi All,
Does anyone know of a way to allow group ownership of a service request in Siebel? Failing this, is it possible to delegate ownership of a service request?
Regards,
Cameron

Cameron, what are you trying to accomplish? A service request can only have one owner and that owner assignment can be done manually, service request assignment rules, or workflow. If you are looking at visibility to service requests by a group of users then I would recommend using Book of Business.

Nokia X2 Android: SMS'ing groups? Bug?

Hi,
Created a group of my friends which I'd like to SMS.
How do you SMS a group on the X2?
PS. Yes it is possible to add people to an SMS one by one... but that's time consuming and you can make a mistake and leave someone off?
PPS. It looks like it might be a bug?
The butterfly effect

Not available on nokia x v1.x -so it might be unavailable on nokia x v2.x too.
Sorry, keep your query down regarding this bug.
No update will be available for your device.
A past Nokia X user, now a X user.

Contacts changes notes in intelligent groups (heavy bug)

I organize my 2.700 contacs with Contacts. But there is a heavy bug by filtering contacts with an keyword in the note section:
If I display an intelligent group and I change only one contact's note with one word, Contacts changes every note in the following entries (alphabetically ordered) with the same word.

Maybe this will solve it: https://discussions.apple.com/message/20452364#20452364

Default Group Ownership and Permissions

All new files created by a standard user (User1) have group assigned as "staff" and group permissions set to "Read only." How do I change the default group and ownership permissions for newly created files?
Said another way: I want new files created by User1 to have group = "Accounting Group" and group permisions = "Read & Write".

You can accomplish what you want to do by using ACLs. First go to System Preferences -> Users & Groups, and make a new group called "accountinggroup". Add the users you want to the group.
You will then need to make a folder in which to store all the files to be shared with this group. Put it in some easily accessible place like in /Users/Shared.
Then log in to an admin account and open Terminal. Paste in all of this and the press return:
sudo chmod -R +a "accountinggroup allow delete,chown,list,search,add_file,\
add_subdirectory,delete_child,file_inherit,directory_inherit" \
Then drag the folder into the Terminal window and press return again.
From then on, any file that is newly created in or copied to any location within that folder hierarchy will have read and write privileges for all users in accountinggroup.
You sir are a genius.
I have been trying to utilise a users iMac a "central file storage" for a small business client (all new Lion Machines). I was having so many issues with Lion's POSIXs permissions and also Lion's new versions feature.
Every time users saves files to the shared folder they would inherit permission from the computer that created the file. Thus is another user logged on and opened the file it would be 'Locked' and have to be duplicated or the users would have to manually edit permission using 'Get Info'
I have applied the ACL via terminal and now it works like a dream! All files have that are put into the shared folder have a group with 'custom' permissions and any one can use and modify the files, provided they have log in credentials.
The only trap i would warn people of is do not use typical group names like "Staff", "workgroup" etc. I found that using those was problematic. I opted for employees.
Thanks again Király

Group ownership of Distribution Group not working

Hi,
We recently migrated from Exchange 2007 to 2013 CU2. We have various security groups with permissions to edit various distribution lists; this is no longer working. I've already researched the problem and I understand two things are necessary for a
user to have permission to edit a distribution list:
1. User must have membership in the My Distribution Groups and My Distro Groups Membership roles. Already done.
2. User must be an owner of the distribution group.
The problem comes with the ownership. I'm assigning ownership of the distribution list to a security group, of which my test user is a member. Per
this article, groups can own groups again as of 2013 CU1.
If I directly assign a user ownership of the group, they can edit membership without issue, which means item #1 is satisfied. But they are not receiving ownership by way of membership in the group that owns the distribution list. Or put another way, their
group membership is not granting them ownership of the group as it should.
Any thoughts? Spent a good hour searching and can't come up with anything.
Thanks,
James

Hi -
That is correct, and is a problem with dozens of existing distribution groups.
For testing purposes I just did the following:
1. Created a new distribution group "Test Distro Group"
2. Created a new mail-enabled security group "Test Distro Group Owners"
3. Ran Set-DistributionGroup -Identity "Test Distro Group" -ManagedBy "Test Distro Group Owners"
4. Confirmed ownership via the shell:
Get-DistributionGroup -Identity "Test Distro Group" | fl
GroupType                               : Universal
SamAccountName                       : Test Distro Group
BypassNestedModerationEnabled  : False
ManagedBy                                 : {contoso.com/Users/Test Distro Group Owners}
5. Confirmed ownership via ECP:
6. Added a test user "_Sample Teacher" to the "Test Distro Group Owners" group. Confirmed membership via ECP:
7. Logged into OWA as "_Sample Teacher," went to Options, then Groups. "Test Distro Group Owners" is shown as a group that the user belongs to, however no groups are shown under "distribution groups I own."
8. If I add "_Sample Teacher" directly as an owner of "Test Distro Group," the group appears as expected as an owned group.
So in short...the user is a member of the security group, the security group owns distribution group; the user should then be an owner of the distro group via membership in the security group, however this is not working.
Thanks for any help you can provide. I'm not sure where to go next.
James

Send Button and XMLP_SCHEDULER group security bug

hi folks,
My BIP users are grouped into basic users who can just read reports and advanced users who can schedule them. Obviously i've done this using the XMLP_SCHEDULER group, no problem. Those in XMLP_SCHEDULER see the scheduler button and it works fine and those not in the group cannot see the schedule button.
However, the basic users who are NOT in the XMLP_SCHEDULER group still see the "send" button, but when they click on it it gives an error:
"Unauthorized Access: please contact the administrator."
I would like the basic users to be able to send, NOT to schedule. Or if this is not possible at least for them not to see the send button!
This seems like a bug in the security setup which i wonder if anyone else has managed to work around.
thanks
neil

Hi Saichand,
I have a related and one requirement on SEND button in BI Publisher. we want to disable SEND button for the users for few reports or enable for few reports.
I mean not taking of the buttion, anyways SEND buttion comes with the product. but they want to enable or disable the buttion for users.
Any ideas / thoughts would be greatly apprecated.
Thanks in advance
skat

Granting a group ownership of an item programmatically??

I've imported a lot of data from another system. Now I need to
set the appropriate permissions on some of the items.
For instance I want to set group id 15 to be the owner of all
items that is a specific (custom) type, e.g. subtype=2442.
The code below is what I've tried, but I'm getting this error
message:
begin
"SUPPORT"."UPDATE_ITEM_PERMISSIONS";
end; (WWV-11230)
Unexpected error encountered in wwsec_api.set_group_acl (ORA-
06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number
conversion error) (WWC-41417)
Has anyone done this successfully?
Any ideas, tips etc is highly appreciated!
-Mats
Create or Replace PROCEDURE SUPPORT.UPDATE_ITEM_PERMISSIONS
as
CURSOR examples_cur IS
SELECT C.ID, C.NAME
FROM PORTAL30.WWV_THINGS C
WHERE SUBTYPE=2442;
begin
FOR ex IN examples_cur
LOOP
htp.p('Changing permission on: ' ||
ex.name || '<BR>');
wwsec_api.set_group_acl
p_group_id => 15,
p_object_type_name => wwsec_api.ITEM_OBJ,
p_owner => wwctx_api.get_product_schema,
p_name => ex.name,
p_privilege => wwsec_api.OWN_PRIV
END LOOP;
end;

You can't call htp.p from SQL*Plus - it must be called through
mod_plsql. Try executing the procedure from within the browser
(use the database navigator) - it should work.
Regards,
Jerry

Report Builder Group Footer Bug?

Data contained in a group footer does not print on a new page
when the group footer is the only section left to fill on the
current page. This is a serious problem when you embed a subreport
in a group footer because the subreport also fills on the same
column and overwrites the existing information instead of forcing a
new page.
Am I the only one experiencing this? Any suggestions?
Here is an example: Notice the data overwritten in the upper
right column. The footer info should have forced a new page.
Group
footer problem example

Try using the Properties Panel - Elements selector to select
the hidden text fields. You should be able to delete them once they
are selected.

BBM Group lists Bug

I have found 1 issue a lot "syncing" We have some group lists which are accessed by all the members. Now the list items updated by 1 member takes ages to update at global level and sometimes they doesn't even sync. Is there a solution to this issue so that all members can actually share the same info.
Also when a member reinstall BBM, groups lists doesn't restore completely.
Sachin Jain
http://BBIndia.net

I've seen similar issues, and of late several people have been reporting some delayed syncing and sending of BBM messages.
I don't know what to offer you other than to wait... adding a new member can take a while, even a few hours, for all the group content to sync.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

MIDI group MUTE bug in Logic 8

1. Create a brand new Logic song
2. Create a few External MIDI tracks
3. Use your pencil tool to create some random segments on these tracks in the Arrange Window
4. Mute some of these segments (not all of them)
5. Go into your group settings and assign all of your MIDI tracks to group 1 (be sure group 1 is enabled in group settings) and make sure "Mute" is checked in group settings as well.
6. Click on mute button on one of your tracks (should mute all of your MIDI tracks)
7. Save the song and close it.
8. Re-open the song
Notice the track mute buttons are deactivated and ALL of your segments in the song are Muted!
In Logic Pro 7, I could open the song again, unmute the tracks and the segments would still be muted and unmuted the same way I left them before saving...

Be sure to let apple know you want this fixed by sending
a description of it to them at the url below...
http://www.apple.com/feedback/logicpro.html

Rolling up Work for Grouped Tasks - Bug

Friends,
Scenario:
Step 1:
Group by any field and look at the Work rolled up value. In the case below it is 200 hours.
Step 2:
Inactivate one of the tasks
Rolled up Work value doesn’t change!?
I’d expect the rolled up value for Work to decrease down to 100 hours.
Is it by design?
Thanks,
Alex
All Tasks Active
One Inactive Task

Hi Rob,
If you work in standalone and it should not be too much complicated to edit it with Project 2013, assuming you have it.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, MCP |

Group ownership bug?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for