Hard code spwr network card for 100-full

How can I hard code a spwr network card for 100-full duplex?
thanks,
Clark

The following lines added to /etc/system sets a hme network card to 100 full duplex,
set hme:hme_adv_autoneg_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_100T4_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_100fdx_cap=1
set hme:hme_adv_100hdx_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_10fdx_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_10hdx_cap=0

Similar Messages

Network card for G$

Can someone recommend a network card for a G4 ?
My built-in card died recently. I installed a DFE-530TX but couldn't get it to work with 10.3.9.
I am looking at some of the G-wireless options but not sure which one to select.
Any recommendation will be greatly appreciated.
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)
power g4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Hi alexago,
Welcome to the Discussions.
metaphyz had a page of Mac OS wireless compatibility list but it seems to be down. Google has it cacked though. Click on the words in blue above to see the cached page.
John

Hi, I got a gift card for 100 euro bought in Europe, but I can not put it on my U.S. account. What should I do? Thanks

Hi, I got a gift card for 100 euro bought in Europe, but I can not put it on my U.S. account. What should I do? Thanks

iTunes gift cards are only valid on accounts based in the country in which the card was issued - so if you have a US account then you can only use US gift cards. Do you know anybody in the country where you bought it from that you could sell or give it to ? Or you could try selling it on a site such as eBay.

Gift Card for $100.00

I'd like to know the status of my Gift Card for $100.00.

Hello RomyBenard,
I'll be more than happy to address your concerns. I will send you a private message to discuss your account information further.
Thank You!

Hard Drives and video card for new CS5 system

I've read through much of the threads in the hardware forums and find I still have questions. I am just beginning to learn how to edit and it is not a source of income for me at the moment. My sources will be from tapes from my Canon HV20 and at some point either a Panasonic GH2, Canon 60D or similar.
I have bought the following:
ASUS P6X58D-E motherboard
24 GB of Patriot Sector 7 DDR3 1333MHz memory (9-9-9-24)
Intel i7-950 3.06 GHz CPU
I plan to use Cineform NEO or maybe NEO HD to ingest my files.
I also have 4 Seagate 750GB 7200.11 hard drives I can use.
It seems like the best bang for the buck for a video card is a GTS 450 at about $100 because I can't find any data that indicates a GTX 460 or a GTX 570 would make any difference (see http://www.studio1productions.com/Articles/PremiereCS5.htm)
As far as hard drives goes, Harm's article on creating separate storage makes sense to me. It seems like I could create a "4 drive" system quite easily (see http://forums.adobe.com/thread/662972). Given that I am not ready to spend moeny on an Areca card until I can develop my skills, I am wondering if I should get one of the new WD Velociraptor 600GB (SATA 6) drives as my system drive for about $280, a 150 GB (SATA 3) Velociraptor drive for about $100, or some other fast drive.
Given that my motherboard can support RAID, should I consider RAIDing the "D" drive or the "E and F" drives?
Is there any value to using an SSD drive for the "E" drive (page file and media cache) [see http://forums.adobe.com/thread/662972]? Microcenter has a 64GB drive for $100.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Harm,
First let me say, I didn't mean to exclude Bill Gehrke. I just didn't know what was what. Thank you for explaining that to me. Let me also say the you and Bill have a great site.
I have a question for you, in the tests I have run with my systems, I am not seeing any speed difference between the 450 and 480. Now granted, they are AMD processors and I know they don't have the SSE 4.1+. Here are my systems that I ran the tests on:
An AMD X4 Quad Core computer running at 2.9 Ghz with 12 gigs of RAM and a single Samsung 7200 rpm SATA 3.0Gb/s hard drive
An AMD X6 Six Core computer running at 3.2 Ghz with 12 gigs of RAM and a single Samsung 7200 rpm SATA 3.0Gb/s hard drive
Both computers were running the same version of the NVidia driver and all non-essential programs were disabled.
When I test the 450 and the 480 in the AMD X4 system, they are turning in pretty much the same level of performance, in that system.
The same holds true with the AMD X6, the 450 and 480 turn in virtually the same level of performance, in this system.
The AMD X6 with either the 450 or 480 does turn in a better performance over the AMD X4 with either video card.
The question.... Are you seeing result that are like this? Where using the exact same computer, turns in the same results with different video cards.
From the number of emails I get about the article, other have reported this to me also. I have had a few people who said when they did see a minor speed increase when they did switch between a 450 and a 480 and a couple who did see a good speed increase.
I am working on changing the article to reflect this and would really appreciate your input or Bills input on this.
I have looked at your benchmark chart and read through the result, but one thing that concerns me when reading some of the results is what programs do they have running in background, if any. And how is that effecting their performance. That is why I used the two systems I listed above to do the tests with. It gives me a controlled enviroment to do test the performance of the video cards in.
As a side note, when I tested the 450 and 480 cards in a friends Intel I7 system, again we didn't see any performance difference between the two video cards, but he did have some programs running in background which may have caused the perfornce results I got.
Best Regards
David Knarr

Network Card for PowerBook G3

Hello everyone,
I have an older laptop and I have been told that I can only access the Internet with dialup because the computer does not have a network card.
Is there one available for the PowerBook G3. Better yet, can I get a wireless card?
Thank you very much
N
Macintosh PowerBook G3 Mac OS 8.6 or Earlier Mac OS 8.5.1

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
The Powerbook G3 has a built-in ethernet port. It is the same as a "network card" 10-base-T. It is slightly wider than the telephone cable though looks like a phone jack.
What age Powerbook G3 do you have? Some have a built-in port to insert an older style airport card (not the Airport Extreme), while others require using a PCMCIA WiFi card such as the Lucent Orinico Gold. See this article to identify your Powerbook G3:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=24604

Replacement network cards for MacPro

My question is for anyone who is familiar with the MacPro motherboard. Lightning blew out my dual ethernet card and the estimate to replace it is around $450. A friend told me I could purchase a compatible network card and plug it directly into one of the three available slots on the mother board. If this is true, could anyone suggest to me a network card that is compatible with the MacPro motherboard? I would appreciate any help with this issue!

Are you considering any particular cards ?
I have had good luck with DEC21040 (10baseT) and DEC21140 (100baseT) cards
in Solaris 7 through Solaris 10 on x86.
The same can be said for 3Com 3C905C-TX cards.
Solaris 8x86 will recognize many chipsets natively,
and a number of third party developers have created working driver packages.
Most of their driver packages are free, but a few are not free.
Solaris 9 works with a few more, and Solaris 10 works with yet more adapters.
The Solaris 8x86 HCL list has the native cards.
This other Sun web page can direct you toward 3rd party sites.

Network cards for Solaris 8 x86

Which network cards are supported by Solaris 8 x86 ?
Thank you !
dorin.

Are you considering any particular cards ?
I have had good luck with DEC21040 (10baseT) and DEC21140 (100baseT) cards
in Solaris 7 through Solaris 10 on x86.
The same can be said for 3Com 3C905C-TX cards.
Solaris 8x86 will recognize many chipsets natively,
and a number of third party developers have created working driver packages.
Most of their driver packages are free, but a few are not free.
Solaris 9 works with a few more, and Solaris 10 works with yet more adapters.
The Solaris 8x86 HCL list has the native cards.
This other Sun web page can direct you toward 3rd party sites.

XPS 8700 - need additional network card for VMware Workstation

Hello -
I'm wanting to add either a dual or quad network card to my XPS 8700 so I can provide physical interfaces for some VMware Workstaion. Is there a specific band or model that is compatible..?
I've tried installing a spare Intel E1G42ET (dual port) card I had laying around, but the OS never saw it even with the drivers from Intel's website loaded up.
Any suggestions..? Thanks,

No - but it's just another card to the BIOS. Also, there's already a Wireless NIC and an Ethernet NIC in there. I appreciate the suggestion - I can test it,. but suspect the issue will remain the same.
Thanks,

Network board 10/100 full duplex

I have an issue with my system (solaris 8 sparc):
If I download a local file from a distant machine the file is going at about 100Mb. If I try to upload that same file then it is going at 10Mb.
I checked the cables etc but could not find anything.
ndd reports correct figures (100Mb and full duplex)
# ndd -get /dev/hme lp_autoneg_cap
1
# ndd -get /dev/hme lp_100fdx_cap
1
# ndd -get /dev/hme lp_100hdx_cap
1
# ndd -get /dev/hme lp_100T4_cap
0
# ndd -get /dev/hme lp_10fdx_cap
1
# ndd -get /dev/hme lp_10hdx_cap
1
Where should I look now?

Thank you for your help
With those parameters set, my bandwith is just worse so I came back to the previous configuration.
I tried hmeconfig (found on the web, a small perl script to display everything) and it showed:
hme0: using RJ-45 at 100 Mbps full-duplex
* RJ-45 Hardware supports: auto-neg, 100-full, 100-half, 10-full, 10-half
* Auto-negotiation is: ON
* Enabled modes: 100-full, 100-half, 10-full, 10-half
* Link Partner supports: auto-neg, 100-full, 100-half, 10-full, 10-half
with default values (nothing in /etc/system) and:
hme0: using RJ-45 at 100 Mbps full-duplex
* RJ-45 Hardware supports: auto-neg, 100-full, 100-half, 10-full, 10-half
* Auto-negotiation is: OFF
* Enabled modes: 100-full
* Link Partner supports: UNKNOWN - interface not in auto-negotiation mode
with the following in /etc/system:
set hme:hme_adv_autoneg_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_100T4_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_100fdx_cap=1
set hme:hme_adv_100hdx_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_10fdx_cap=0
set hme:hme_adv_10hdx_cap=0
This sounds normal except that the second one is just slower for ftp exchanges.
I cannot understand this.

Network Card for HP Laser Jet 2420

What type of network card do I need do I buy to put this printer on a network?

Hi,
Sorry, looks like no other choice since they (all models of the series) shown on the following links:
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/au/en/sm/WF10a/18972-18972-3328059-3328066-3328066-416419.html
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF13a/18972-236251-236263-14638-f51-416419.html
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

Teamed network cards for domain controllers?

can someone help me to resolve a debate we have: my colleage states that domain controllers (in our case Win2003SP2) should "not" have their network cards teamed for high availability (via HP's NIC teaming software).? I've not heard of this and cannot Bing/Google anything like this. I'm under the impression that a domain controller "should" have it's gigabit NICs teamed to make sure that directory services are highly available.
any information on this would be great. thanks...Peter A. Berger Jr.

Fault Tolerance and Network Teaming
                Anyone who has called Microsoft for help with a networking problem has likely heard the question: "Are you using network teaming?" I have often heard this referred to by Microsoft's customers as a "quick out" or an excuse that Microsoft was looking to pass the responsibility on to someone else. As someone that has been on both ends of the phone, and at the highest escalation point within Microsoft's Network queues I can tell you that it is a question born of wisdom and tempered with experience. While working the phones at Microsoft, supporting the largest and most critical systems in the US it was rare to ever get a call about the same problem more than once. Even more rare was for everyone on our group to get the same calls, and have the same experiences. I recall it happening when we fought the blaster worm, and when Microsoft's "Scalable Networking Pack" was released with 2003 SP2. These were bad, but a few months went by and except for a few straggles the phone calls stopped, the world got wise to the issue and the problem was resolved. I was amazed though to experience 1-3 calls a week with network issues CAUSED by network teaming. I could not help but be blown away by the irony of a program meant to avoid network failure so often causing it. I talked to colleagues, (of which I have found no better single source in the industry than at Microsoft), and found that even the old timers having more than 15 years with the company had the same stories of problems caused by networking teaming as we are constantly experiencing today. I am amazed that an industry as wise and agile as the computer industry has been (and is), has stuck with such a poor technology. I always asked my customers as the called with problems, usually critical ones, "What is teaming these network cards getting you". Almost unanimously the answer would come fault tolerance, to which I would reply rhetorically "How often do you NICs or Switches fail and how often has teaming caused network failure?" In my opinion, it is unforgivable for an application to constantly cause the problem that it is written to avoid. It should cause pause and reflection as to whether the technology is well suited for its function, whether it is just written poorly or if all of its implementations have similar problems. Technology today is beyond network teaming. There are far better methods of providing fault tolerance with manual and automatic failover. Most application writers have taken into consideration fault tolerance at the service level superseding anything that network teaming offers, so that network teaming should be a dead technology, because it is killing us.
                Finally, if you are considering using network teaming, or have had reason to reconsider its use, maybe these questions will help your assessment:
                What is my goal with using network teaming?
                Can I gain Availability through use of a more capable NIC card?
                How often have my NIC cards failed?
                When NIC cards have failed were they the only failure, or was it in conjunction with a Motherboard or other failure causing the service to be unavailable?
                What are my needs for uptime for these services?
                Would a manual failover (the simplest of options) be viable for this service?
                What options for automatic failover do I have (since most applications can have multiple providers through configuration)?
                One other note to add. While working on the phones at Microsoft, and later as a consultant to large and federal organizations, I found one thing that seemed to be true most of the time. When a problem occurred, it was rarely the OS itself, but something unnatural to its processes. Simplicity and minimalism is really one of the keys to a healthy server and environment. Often it is necessary to introduce other applications and services, but I do not think near as often as we do.
Note: MSFT does not support network teaming, because they do not own the software that provides it. In certain instances though, like with OCS, they flat out will not support OCS if teaming is enabled on the server.
Note2: I realize my comments above are very general, and so I want to apply these to this exact question. When I consider AD and how to make it fault tolerant, I cannot help but realize that the protocols, clients and services that make up Directory Services, are beautifully fault tolerant. In most cases, the loss of any one DC would not greatly affect the user's ability to authenticate to a computer or service within the domain. Even more, Directory services is inherently so fault tolerant that it can still function with the loss of a major part of the servers that make it up.
Don't forget to give credit where credit is due, vote this as helpful if it helped you.

Where can I find an apple airport extreme wi-fi network card for my Mac pro 2x 2.26ghz nehalem?

I can't seem to locate the correct network card anywhere, so I assume I'm attempting to find it without all the information. Assistance as to which card is the right one and where I can find it would be appreciated.

You mean the card shown here and here?

Utlizing 4 network cards for SUN v245

Hi
I would like to check if using the 4 network cards binded to the same ip address would be able to utlilize 1000Mbps?
Or would just configuring 1 card be sufficient?
How is it done??
thanks

Did a traditional, JETless jump overnight, and had the same effect. So it's not JET.

"back to school 2012" redeem card for $100

I bought my mac last July and got this redeem card. But I left the U.S. a month later and I haven't got a chance to use that card. It seems that this card is only valid on U.S. itunes store, which means I can use it only when I am back to the U.S.
My questions are:
1. Does this card have a time limit for me to use that? Or the remainder in this card is available forever?
2. If I perchase an app which is not free on mac using this card, will my iphone and ipad also get this app for free synchronizedly via the same Apple ID?

I am trying to buy a case online for my new Macbook Pro with my given $100 gift card but am having some difficulties.
That is the Apple online store.
You can use your Back to School Gift Card to download apps, music, books, and more from the Mac App Store, the iTunes Store, the iBookstore, and the App Stores only.
From here > http://store.apple.com/us/browse/campaigns/back_to_school

Hard code spwr network card for 100-full

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for