Header Fields Layout- Hierarchy of Fields is not proper in Order Proposal

I have used the BADI /FRE/IF_EX_UI_RWB_BADI_004~GET_OPTIONAL_HEADER_FIELDS to set the visibility and hierarchy of fields .
Currently the layout I am getting is as follows
1
2
3
4
The desired layout is as follows
1 2
3 4

You can get Top-of-page easily by using the following code.
DATA: it_list_top_of_page TYPE slis_t_listheader,
          it_events TYPE slis_t_event,
          gs_layout TYPE slis_layout_alv,
          lwa_line TYPE slis_listheader.
FORM list_header USING lt_top_of_page TYPE slis_t_listheader.
lwa_line-typ = 'S'.
lwa_line-key = text-105.
CONCATENATE sy-datum+6(2) '.'
              sy-datum+4(2) '.'
              sy-datum(4) INTO lwa_line-info.
APPEND lwa_line TO lt_top_of_page.
CLEAR lwa_line.
lwa_line-typ = 'S'.
lwa_line-key = text-107.
lwa_line-info = sy-uname.
APPEND lwa_line TO lt_top_of_page.
CLEAR lwa_line.
IF gt_merge_01 IS INITIAL.
    ld_linesc = 0.
ENDIF.
lwa_line-typ = 'S'.
lwa_line-key = text-108.
lwa_line-info = ld_linesc.
APPEND lwa_line TO lt_top_of_page.
ENDFORM.                    "list_header
*&      Form top_of_page
      text
FORM top_of_page.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_COMMENTARY_WRITE'
    EXPORTING
      it_list_commentary = it_list_top_of_page
ENDFORM.                    "top_of_page
PLZ REWARD POINTS IF HELPFUL.....

Similar Messages

Delivery date does not match sales orders proposed delivery date

when i create sales order the requested delivery date by default is todays date and if nobody changes it, it will stay the same even after i save the order but the acutal delivery date is diffrent in the sales document or delivery document
can anyone please throw some light on it
Thanks in advance

Hi Raj,
Req D Date is the date on which teh custoemr wants the goods to be delivered. But it wont be possible always. So there will be an availability check on the stock of that material and based on the availability and transportation lead times, the possible delivery date will be determined and populated at the schedule line level of the document.
Hope this clarifies your doubt.
Reward if this helps.

Display output fields in Hierarchy format in ALV report

Hi,
I have a requirement to display the output fileds in ALV report, the output format is like this . The output field should be in ALV format, under each purchase order its corresponding line item should appear.
Pruchase Order 4700000581
company code        item
        9001                     10
        9001                     20.
        9001                     30.
Pruchase Order 4700000174
        9001                     10
        9001                     20.
Can any one please help me how to do this in ALV report.

Hi
This can be achieved using the Heirarchial ALV list
see the sample and do it
REPORT ZALV5_OBJECTS.
TABLES : EKKO.
TYPE-POOLS : SLIS.
TYPES : BEGIN OF TY_EKKO,
EBELN TYPE EKPO-EBELN,
EBELP TYPE EKPO-EBELP,
STATU TYPE EKPO-STATU,
AEDAT TYPE EKPO-AEDAT,
MATNR TYPE EKPO-MATNR,
MENGE TYPE EKPO-MENGE,
MEINS TYPE EKPO-MEINS,
NETPR TYPE EKPO-NETPR,
PEINH TYPE EKPO-PEINH,
END OF TY_EKKO.
DATA: IT_EKKO TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_EKKO INITIAL SIZE 0,
IT_EKPO TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_EKKO INITIAL SIZE 0,
IT_EMPTYTAB TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_EKKO INITIAL SIZE 0,
WA_EKKO TYPE TY_EKKO,
WA_EKPO TYPE TY_EKKO.
DATA: OK_CODE LIKE SY-UCOMM, "OK-Code
SAVE_OK LIKE SY-UCOMM.
*ALV data declarations
DATA: FIELDCATALOG TYPE LVC_T_FCAT WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: GD_FIELDCAT TYPE LVC_T_FCAT,
GD_TAB_GROUP TYPE SLIS_T_SP_GROUP_ALV,
GD_LAYOUT TYPE SLIS_LAYOUT_ALV.
*ALVtree data declarations
CLASS CL_GUI_COLUMN_TREE DEFINITION LOAD.
CLASS CL_GUI_CFW DEFINITION LOAD.
DATA: GD_TREE TYPE REF TO CL_GUI_ALV_TREE,
GD_HIERARCHY_HEADER TYPE TREEV_HHDR,
GD_REPORT_TITLE TYPE SLIS_T_LISTHEADER,
GD_LOGO TYPE SDYDO_VALUE,
GD_VARIANT TYPE DISVARIANT.
*Create container for alv-tree
DATA: GD_TREE_CONTAINER_NAME(30) TYPE C,
GD_CUSTOM_CONTAINER TYPE REF TO CL_GUI_CUSTOM_CONTAINER.
*Includes
*INCLUDE ZDEMO_ALVTREEO01. "Screen PBO Modules
*INCLUDE ZDEMO_ALVTREEI01. "Screen PAI Modules
*INCLUDE ZDEMO_ALVTREEF01. "ABAP Subroutines(FORMS)
*Start-of-selection.
START-OF-SELECTION.
ALVtree setup data
PERFORM DATA_RETRIEVAL.
PERFORM BUILD_FIELDCATALOG.
PERFORM BUILD_LAYOUT.
PERFORM BUILD_HIERARCHY_HEADER CHANGING GD_HIERARCHY_HEADER.
PERFORM BUILD_REPORT_TITLE USING GD_REPORT_TITLE GD_LOGO.
PERFORM BUILD_VARIANT.
Display ALVtree report
CALL SCREEN 100.
*& Form data_retrieval
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
FORM DATA_RETRIEVAL .
SELECT EBELN
UP TO 10 ROWS
FROM EKKO
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_EKKO.
LOOP AT IT_EKKO INTO WA_EKKO.
SELECT EBELN EBELP STATU AEDAT MATNR MENGE MEINS NETPR PEINH
FROM EKPO
APPENDING TABLE IT_EKPO
WHERE EBELN EQ WA_EKKO-EBELN.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM. " data_retrieval
*& Form build_fieldcatalog
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
FORM BUILD_FIELDCATALOG .
Please not there are a number of differences between the structure of
ALVtree fieldcatalogs and ALVgrid fieldcatalogs.
For example the field seltext_m is replace by scrtext_m in ALVtree.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'EBELN'. "Field name in itab
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'Purchase Order'. "Column text
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 0. "Column position
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15. "Column width
FIELDCATALOG-EMPHASIZE = 'X'. "Emphasize (X or SPACE)
FIELDCATALOG-KEY = 'X'. "Key Field? (X or SPACE)
fieldcatalog-do_sum = 'X'. "Sum Column?
fieldcatalog-no_zero = 'X'. "Don't display if zero
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT.
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'EBELP'.
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'PO Iten'.
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15.
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 1.
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT..
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'STATU'.
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'Status'.
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15.
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 2.
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT..
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'AEDAT'.
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'Item change date'.
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15.
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 3.
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT..
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'MATNR'.
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'Material Number'.
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15.
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 4.
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT..
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'MENGE'.
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'PO quantity'.
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15.
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 5.
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT..
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'MEINS'.
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'Order Unit'.
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15.
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 6.
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT..
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'NETPR'.
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'Net Price'.
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15.
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 7.
FIELDCATALOG-DATATYPE = 'CURR'.
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT..
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
FIELDCATALOG-FIELDNAME = 'PEINH'.
FIELDCATALOG-SCRTEXT_M = 'Price Unit'.
FIELDCATALOG-OUTPUTLEN = 15.
FIELDCATALOG-COL_POS = 8.
APPEND FIELDCATALOG TO GD_FIELDCAT..
CLEAR FIELDCATALOG.
ENDFORM. " build_fieldcatalog
*& Form build_layout
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
FORM BUILD_LAYOUT .
GD_LAYOUT-NO_INPUT = 'X'.
GD_LAYOUT-COLWIDTH_OPTIMIZE = 'X'.
GD_LAYOUT-TOTALS_TEXT = 'Totals'(201).
gd_layout-totals_only = 'X'.
gd_layout-f2code = 'DISP'. "Sets fcode for when double
"click(press f2)
gd_layout-zebra = 'X'.
gd_layout-group_change_edit = 'X'.
gd_layout-header_text = 'helllllo'
ENDFORM. " build_layout
*& Form build_hierarchy_header
text
<--P_GD_HIERARCHY_HEADER text
FORM BUILD_HIERARCHY_HEADER CHANGING
P_HIERARCHY_HEADER TYPE TREEV_HHDR.
P_HIERARCHY_HEADER-HEADING = 'Hierarchy Header'(013).
P_HIERARCHY_HEADER-TOOLTIP = 'This is the Hierarchy Header !'(014).
P_HIERARCHY_HEADER-WIDTH = 30.
P_HIERARCHY_HEADER-WIDTH_PIX = ''.
ENDFORM. " build_hierarchy_header
*& Form build_report_title
text
-->P_GD_REPORT_TITLE text
-->P_GD_LOGO text
FORM BUILD_REPORT_TITLE USING PT_REPORT_TITLE TYPE SLIS_T_LISTHEADER
P_GD_LOGO TYPE SDYDO_VALUE.
DATA: LS_LINE TYPE SLIS_LISTHEADER,
LD_DATE(10) TYPE C.
List Heading Line(TYPE H)
CLEAR LS_LINE.
LS_LINE-TYP = 'H'.
ls_line-key "Not Used For This Type(H)
LS_LINE-INFO = 'PO ALVTree Display'.
APPEND LS_LINE TO PT_REPORT_TITLE.
Status Line(TYPE S)
LD_DATE(2) = SY-DATUM+6(2).
LD_DATE+2(1) = '/'.
LD_DATE3(2) = SY-DATUM4(2).
LD_DATE+5(1) = '/'.
LD_DATE+6(4) = SY-DATUM(4).
LS_LINE-TYP = 'S'.
LS_LINE-KEY = 'Date'.
LS_LINE-INFO = LD_DATE.
APPEND LS_LINE TO PT_REPORT_TITLE.
Action Line(TYPE A)
CLEAR LS_LINE.
LS_LINE-TYP = 'A'.
CONCATENATE 'Report: ' SY-REPID INTO LS_LINE-INFO SEPARATED BY SPACE.
APPEND LS_LINE TO PT_REPORT_TITLE.
ENDFORM. " build_report_title
*& Form build_variant
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
FORM BUILD_VARIANT .
Set repid for storing variants
GD_VARIANT-REPORT = SY-REPID.
ENDFORM. " build_variant
Reward points for useful Answers
Regards
Anji

PO screen custom fields are not in correct order

Hi Experts,
After creating Shopping cart and purchase order successfully created.
Added my custom fields for PO structure INCL_EEW_PD_ITEM_CSD_PO fields are visible in PO screen automatically with out adding my custom fields in PO layout /SAPSRM/WDC_DODC_PO_I_BD
when i go to PO screen i can see my custom fields but all fields are not in correct order.How can my fields should be in order.
and i added two custom buttons in my PO layout for WD component /SAPSRM/WDC_DODC_PO_I_BD i am not able to see my buttons?
Could you please help me out in this issues its urgent.
Thanks,
Venkatesh G

I've had this problem. There may be a more elegant solution, but what I do is make a playlist of the album and put the movements in the correct order in the playlist. I've also put numbers (01, 02, etc.) in front of the name of the movements. Either one works.
Hope this helps.
Ben

Field name DUMMY is reserved (Do not use structure as include in DB table)

We are trying to add a custom field, e.g., called ZZZ in LIS Communication structure MCEKKO (Purchasing Document Header) by creating a new custom append structure and add the field ZZZ into it, then activate the new append structure, but get warning msg like "Field name DUMMY is reserved (Do not use structure as include in DB table)".
We do find a field called DUMMY in the structure MCEKKO. How to get rid of the warning msg and successfully activate the new custom append structure with the new field ZZZ?
We will give you reward points for correct solutions for the above problem!
Thanks

hi Dinesh,
But we wonder why this new custom field appended can not be seen from the right frame of the extraction structure in LBWE?
Any idea?
Thanks

Input field in Web Dynpro ALV does not have correct focus

Hello Friends,
Our client's SAP system is recently upgraded with ECC 6.0 SP 18.
After that the focus in the editable field of Web Dynpro ALV does not working properly by down arrow navigation.
The common scenario:
The ALV has more than one rows and one column is editable...
when user is selecting field of first row and making some entries...
after that pressing down arrow it is going to next row and coloring the field like focusing...
but the 'cursor' is not blinking so user can not make entry without clicking by mouse...
this was working Ok before upgrade...
Could you please anyone have a look and propose a suitable solution?
Thanks
Krish

Hello,
The problem was with Javascript....which play an important role in layout of web dynpro ALV...
which resides in MIME repository -> SAP ->PUBLIC - >BC ->NW5 ->JS ->SAPURI_Ie6....
We wrote to SAP for giving us the fix...
after we got a new file from SAP the problem is solved...
also we have to clear server cache through SMICM and client cache...
Thanks.
K.

Input Field Layout - Documementation For Various Address Cleanse Engine

Hi All,
Where I can get a documentation for input field layout for various address cleanse engine available in Global Address Cleanse transformation:
1. Australia
2. Canada
3. EMEA
4. Global Address
5. Japan
6.USA
Thnaks,
Amit

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I meant that both usa and germany address has only street and country information and without other information.
And of cos without sufficient information, global address cleanse would not be able to correct it.
The difference i am having is that, after global address cleanse, the PRIMARY_NAME1 field of the output field of the germany record is filled up as what we gave for the input However, the PRIMARY_NAME1 field of the output field of the USA record is blank.
Both records are of status info code 2000 (Unable to identify locality, region, and/or postcode information on input. )
So the question is that, if the USA engine is not able to cleanse the data, would it map the input street field onto the output PRIMARY_NAME1 field? Or would it give a blank PRIMARY_NAME1 field?

Custom fields in additional data B not displaying - Sales Order

Hi gurus,
I added some custom fields to the addtional data B tabstrip in sales order screen, but they didn't display. This is in the client's system. BUT in our own system it works perfectly. The screen has been activated.
Maybe it's because of the version difference?
Anyone experienced this before?
Any suggestion will be great.
Thanks

Resolved by myself.
For those who would have the same question, please refer to SAP note 386694.

Web form fields not staying in order

Does anyone know why the fields in my forms keep re-arranging themselves. For example I will move "Field 2" below "Field 6" and everything looks like it works but when I insert the form on a page the fields are not in the order I set. Any advice?

Hi,
That is a bit strange do you have an example form on your site that we can look into further?
Please also provide the exact steps that you are doing so we can closely replicate to see where the issue could be coming from.
Cheers!
-Sidney

My calculation "Total" box adds sum of all text fields whether they are visible or not, do I change

I have check boxes that show and hide text fields. (Thanks to Gilads Java script). In options I have a default value for each text field.
My "Total" Field field adds all fields even if they are not checked and visible. Need to have it only include them if they are checked and visible.

You can't attach forms by email, or any other means, so it didn't come through.
Since your fields have default values and aren't calculated based on the state of the corresponding check box, you will have to use a custom calculation script for the Total field that can check to see if any of the fields are hidden, and if so, don't include their values in the sum. For example:
// Custom calculation script
(function () {
    // Set up an array of field names to include in the total
    var aFields = ["text1", "text2", "text3", text4"];
    // Initialize variables
    var i, f, sum = 0;
    // Loop through the fields an calculate the sum
    for (i = 0; i < aFields.length; i += 1) {
        // Get the current field
        f = getField(aFields[i]);
        // Add the value of the current field to the sum if the field is visible
        if (f.display == display.visible) {
            sum += +f.value;
    // Set this field value to the sum
    event.value = sum;
You can send me a PM if you want help offline.

Balancing field "Segment" in line item 001 not filled while posting through

HI All,
I am experiencing the below error while processing FB70 transaction in Foreign currency with Tax codes (earlier this problem was not there, this is happening recently). The error description as given below.
"Balancing field "Segment" in line item 001 not filled
Message no. GLT2201
Diagnosis
The field Segment marked as balancing is not filled with any value in line item 001, even after document splitting.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
First check your entries.
Additional causes could be:
No value can be derived for this field from the current document data.
You have entered a document type that is not designed for this business purpose."
I have verified all the relevant settings like Classify G/L accounts for document Splitting and Document types etc and all settings are seems to be ok.
But in the below two instances, Iu2019m not getting any error:
If posting is done in company code currency with same tax codes.
If posting is done in foreign currency without tax codes
Your early respons is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Thanx & Regards
Ramesh

Hello
Have you chosen Segment as Mandatory for the Scenarios during Document splitting. If not then for the G/L account you are facing problems with goto the field status and make segment field optional.
Thanks and Regards

While Doing F-28 error-Balancing field "Profit Center" in line 002 not fill

Hello Sir,
I am doing F-28 Customer Incoming Payment , i have clear three invoice against payment.
So when i post that entry system gives me error Balancing field "Profit Center" in line 002 not filled".
so that entry could not found profit center. (Document Splitting Activate)
So can i assign Customer reconciliation account in T code - FAGL3KEH and assign Common Profit Center there.
Plz guide me , if i will assign there recon account ?.
reply soon
Thanks
J

Hi James,
According to me, you have two options, either enter the PC at the time of document entry or Go to doc.splitting & uncheck the PC mandatory field under doc. splitting characteristics for GL accounting.
Your problem will get resolve by doing this.
Thanks & Regards
Anuj Agarwal

Fields are bold for some users, not bold for others.

Post Author: karene
CA Forum: General
I have a report in Crystal reports XI using BusinessObjects. One of my users is complaining that one of the fields is bold. But it's not set to bold in the report, and when I run the same report, called the same way, with the same data, the field is not bold. We had a note about printer drivers, and he ran through our help on that, but it didn't change anything.
The field is actually a subreport, but I looked at that, and it is a straight database field (SQL Server 2000, memo type), not a formula, and it is not set to bold anywhere in Crystal, at least not that I can see. And besides, it doesn't print bold for me. He saved to a pdf and sent it to me, and it is bold. I saved the same data report to a pdf and it is not bold.
Does anyone have any ideas for a direction I should look? I think I recall seeing this field bold at some time on my machine, which makes me think it has something to do with a difference in Windows between our two machines. But that's pretty vague.
Here is some additional information. It's not always the same field. Sometimes two fields in a report are bold. It happens for users with both IE6 and IE7, although it's also not happening for some of us with IE6. We can set our IE6 settings to the same, and it happens for one and not for another.
-Karen

Post Author: karene
CA Forum: General
I'll ask about and check the Acrobat -- but we're using the ActiveX viewer -- so how does that matter? We've tried changing default printers before running the report, but it doesn't seem to make any difference. But... when I open the report to edit it, it does complain about me not having the printer that the report sees as a default, so it still may be related to printer drivers. I think that's a good direction to keep investigating.
I don't think the customer would like the entire report in bold, but that is an innovative solution!
I saw a post from about 6 months ago where it seemed like someone had the same problem, but there was no reply or solution. If I do figure it out (or if your help leads me in the right direction), I'll post the solution.
Thank you for the reply.
-Karen

IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_FI:Balancing field "Profit Center" in line 004 not filled

Hi All
We have set up dopcument splitting funtionality and it is working fine when document is posted through FB60.
When I am trying the same using Idocs, it is issuing error message "Balancing field "Profit Center" in line 004 not filled".
The processing routine for this idoc is IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_FI and process code is INVF.
I tried to debug it and found that the profit center is not being popoulated for vendor line item which is cautomatically calculated from the GL line items which are there in the idoc. This is the reason the error is issued.
I want to know why profit center is not populated for vendor item. When I do it from FB60, it is populated.
Can anyone help me here ?
Is there any SAP note related to this?

Hi
Pleaes note that it is not allowing me to enter the profit center, neither in PO nor in GR.
I created two different POs.
a. Both are for non stock material with account assignment category 'K'
b. Material group for both the POs are same.
c. GL Account i entered in both the POs are same.
d. CO area entered in both the POs are same.
e. Ogranizational details of both the POs are same.
f. Ofcourse 'Ordering Unit' is different in both the POs.
When i tried to make a GR for the first PO, it is automatically proposing the profit center and i can post the GR. But when i tried the second PO, it is nether defaulting the profit center nor asking for profit center. It is giving an error message "Balancing field Profit Center in the line item 001 not filled.
We have not changed the profit center or any configirutaions and when we tried to do the GR simultaniously for both the POs, one get posted correctly and the other one is giving this error message.
Can any one of you please let me know what should be the reason ?
Thanks
Venkat.

Balancing field "Segment" in line item 001 not filled

Hi Viewers,
I am getting the below error when i post following error.
Cr Vendor
DR AP Upload A/C
Balancing field "Segment" in line item 001 not filled
Message no. GLT2201
Diagnosis
The field Segment marked as balancing is not filled with any value in line item 001, even after document splitting.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
First check your entries.
Additional causes could be:
No value can be derived for this field from the current document data.
You have entered a document type that is not designed for this business purpose.
Procedure for System Administration
Customizing
I have given the profit center in the AP Upolad GL account. Where as if i am not giving the any profit center it posting the document, system is taking the defult profit center and segment from the Edit Constants for Nonassigned Processes.
Please help me to overcome this issue since it is affecting my UAT and Integeration testing
if i am getting any answers it would be highly appreciated
Thanks
Aswin

Hi, Check this note may help you
Note 1026966 - Document splitting: No segment derived
Summary
Symptom
You implement the central document splitting for segment in an ERP system. The segment is not derived from the profit center while you postprocess the document splitting. The error message GLT2 201: "Balancing field "Segment" in line item nn not filled" may be displayed.
FORM COMPLETE_ASSIGNMENT
Delta001Context Block
ls_key-splitmethd = id_method.
get linetypes that will be splitted
IF ls_key <> ss_key.
    ss_key = ls_key.
Delete Block
    LOOP AT it_control_split_tab ASSIGNING <lf_control>.
Insert Block
    REFRESH st_linetype.
    LOOP AT it_control_split_tab ASSIGNING <lf_control>.

Header Fields Layout- Hierarchy of Fields is not proper in Order Proposal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for