Heading 1 level missing from TOC?

I have this little RH 7 sample project.
When converting to PDF using 'Printed Documentation Wizard',
the primary Heading 1 level is NOT included in the MS Word/PDF
'Table of Contents'.
I'm not using any MS Word templates, just the project's CSS
styles.
Arcrobat PDFMaker settings in MS Word are set to default and
include Heading 1-9.
I've searched and searched but I don't know how to include
this Heading 1 level in the TOC.
When checking the MS Word 2003 document through Insert
>> Reference >> Index and Tables, the Heading 1 level
is missing from the tab 'Table of Contents'.
When adding the Heading 1 level there through 'Options'
button, the TOC updates correctly, but I don't know how to include
this Heading 1 level through RH.
Sample project
here
A note on the sample project:
You'll see that every topic title associated with TOC book is
excluded from PDF through conditional build tags.
This was done so prevent titles from being printed twice in
PDF.
For example, in the TOC there's an item titled 'Balance
sheet', the associated topic Balance_sheet.htm has exactly the same
title 'Balance sheet'.
To prevent this title from being printed twice in PDF, the
topic title was excluded through conditional build tag.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Herman

> > Are you sure the print layout is 100% the same on
both PCs, particularly the Build Expression?
> I'll check again this evening when I have access to the
other PC.
I took a copy of the project on the rogue machine, copied it
to the second machine, ran the printed documentation wizard and
checked the settings. The result is as expected. I get the TOC with
the correct headings, the second one in my PDF.
In the meantime I've also compiled the printed documentation
on a third PC (with XP + PDF plugin that comes with RoboHelp). The
result is the wrong TOC, the first one in my PDF.
> Try generating on the rogue machine to just Word, not
the PDF. When the document opens in Word instead of reinserting the
TOC, right click to the right of the TOC and select Update Field.
Does that correct it?
I'll try that tomorrow when I have access to that PC.
Very weird.
Thanks again Peter.
Herman

Similar Messages

  • P6WS "WSS header is missing from request. Can't do username token authentication."

    I am getting the error "WSS header is missing from request. Can't do username token authentication." when trying to connect with SOAP and use Token Auth. I can get Cookies to work just fine, but i need to be able to connect to both.
    testWebReference.Login clientLogin = new testWebReference.Login();
    testWebReference.LoginResponse clResponse = new testWebReference.LoginResponse();
    testWebReference.AuthenticationService authClient = new AuthenticationService();
    clientLogin.UserName = paUsername.Text;
    clientLogin.Password = paPassword.Text;
    clientLogin.DatabaseInstanceId = Int32.Parse(paDBI.Text);
    clientLogin.DatabaseInstanceIdSpecified = true;
    AuthenticationService service = new AuthenticationService();
    service.Url = proxy;
    service.SoapVersion = System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapProtocolVersion.Soap11;
    service.Login(clientLogin);

    I uploaded an example of usertoken on My Oracle Support community.
    TestUserToken.zip
    V/r,
    Gene

  • Don't heading levels convert to TOC?

    I just upgraded to RH7 from RH5. I'm on XP Pro 2002 SP 2, RH
    for Word v 7.0 Build 145. I've got a Word file I'm converting to
    FlashHelp. The word file has headings H1 H2 H3 tagged. I swear, in
    RH5 (it's been a while) when I imported, the topics broke at the
    headings and arranged themselves according to heading level; the
    TOC was indented to three levels where necessary and followed the
    chronological order of content in the Word file. Now in RH7 all the
    topics come in and don't appear in the TOC indented according to
    heading level. Was I hallucinating? I'd check RH5 myself but it no
    longer works on my cptr and Adobe won't support it. Last, I can't
    get the TOC to keep my topics in chronological order. My section A
    has only one level; my section B has three levels, etc and RH wants
    to put all the single-level topics together. Is there a way I can
    get my conversion and my TOC to behave the way I swear it behaved
    in RH5?

    You either use
    the Export PDF function in the Tools panel on Adobe Reader
    do the conversion online after signing in to the https://cloud.acrobat.com/exportpdf site
    [topic moved to ExportPDF forum]

  • Books, Topics Missing from TOC

    Why when publishing and merging 2 projects, one of the projects does not completely publish?  When I publish each as a standalone project they each publish completely.
    Additional Info - Using RoboHELP Server Web Administrator, if I uncheck the "Automatically merger projects of the same type" and then View each project seperately each Project is complete (the TOC for each is complete).  If I check the "Automatically merger projects of the same type" and view the merged Project one of the Projects is only partially viewable.  In other words the TOC does not contain all the project books and pages.  Unchecking the "Automatically merger projects of the same type" and the TOC is once again complete.
    I applied a fix suggested by Adobe support and now I am getting the following message whenever I click on a Book in the TOC at any level, "Loading, click to cancel..."  BTW, clicking on the message does nothing.

    Hi, Cape Ops
    As Adobe support probably indicated to you, this is a known issue and I am working with several other folks on a similar fix. Please email me off-forum at my profile address which can be found by clicking on my forum picture. I'd like to know more details so I can consolidate my support requests. I'll let you know what solutions Adobe is working on and post them here at that time. I would particularly like to know how many levels your TOC has (i.e. what level of "nested" books do you have?)
    Thanks
    John Daigle
    Adobe Certified RoboHelp and Captivate Instructor
    Evergreen, Colorado
    www.showmethedemo.com

  • Book Missing from TOC after Compile

    Hi All,
    This is compltely baffling to me. I have a project with roughly 120 topics and a very large number of baggage files (mostly PDFs). The TOC divides the content into five main sections, an introductory section, and a section for the baggage files ("exhibits"). I divided the Exhibits/Baggage section into a further five sub-books, one for each main section.
    Here is a quick look at the structure (just the books/folders)
    00
    01
    01a
    01b
    01c
    01d
    02
    03
    04
    05
    Exhibits
    X01
    X02
    X03
    X04
    X04a (lots of exhibits in this section)
    X04b
    X04c
    X04d
    X05 (no longer displays in finished compile)
    For some reason, one of the TOC books does not display after compiling the project! It is there in the development interface and looking at the .hhc file in a text editor shows all the right contents there as well. My primary layout is WebHelp but it does not display when compiling to HTMLHelp either.
    I tried removing the TOC section, saving, compiling, and then readding the section and recompiling, but that didn't work.  I tried moving the TOC section and not only did that not work, but even in a new location of the TOC, it was that particular section that did not show up!
    I am using RH8.0.2 on a Win XP machine.
    Does anyone have any thoughts? I would appreciate any help.
    Thanks,
    -jeff

    Hello,
    We are having a similar issue. We recently upgraded from X5 to X8 and imported and converted our X5 project to X8 without any problems. After our conversion, we are having TOC issues. We patched up X8 to the latest version, 8.0.2.208.
    This is what we are using:
    XP Professional Service Pack 2
    RoboHelp 8.0.2.208
    RoboHelp Server 8
    This is our project info:
    1185 topic pages
    WebHelp Pro layout
    671 MB (Project size including baggage files, images, multimedia files, and topic pages)
    7,357 files
    174 folders
    Here is our issue. Not all of our TOCs are displaying when we veiw our project through the engine, but if we view the project without going through the engine, all of our TOCs display correctly.
    This is what our TOC looks like in our project:
    This is what our TOC looks like after compiled and going through the engine:
    This is what our TOC looks like after compiled and NOT going through the engine:
    I've tried creating a new TOC and checking the Copy existing Table of Content box and deleting the old TOC and that did not work. I also deleted the TOC and rebuilt it from scratch (within X8) thinking the TOC messed up when it converted from X5 to X8 and it still did not work. I removed the following characters in the TOC and file names (&, <, >,) and that did not work.
    We had 2 TOC pages linked directly to PDFs in our baggage files and I removed the TOC pages according to some ideas in this post, still no solution. I've tried Peter's suggestions #1, 2, and 3 without any success. I know this has been answered no, but it seems like the server is allowing a certain number of books and TOC pages to be published. I have checked to see if the pages have conditional build tags and they do not.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

  • 4-line e-mail header is missing from printed e-mail off hp e-printer

    This happened suddenly, from one day to the other.. Now when I receive an e-mail to my customized hp-eprint printer, there is no To / FROM / DATE / SUBJECT line anymore
    How can I restore it? Thank you.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Hey Nomadics!
    The email headers do not print when using ePrint. Only the body of the message/attachments print. If you were getting this information before, then it was contained in the body of the message. Your email client may have been doing that automatically so to restore it you might check your email settings. There is no way to turn this on through the ePrint feature at this time.
    Hope this helps!
    If I have solved your issue, please feel free to provide kudos and make sure you mark this thread as solution provided!
    Although I work for HP, my posts and replies are my own opinion and not those of HP.

  • OSB - Content length http header missing from business service out message

    Hi all,
    I am having some diffuclty with a business service in OSB. I created the business service from the wsdl and created a regular proxy service that just routes to the business service. When i run the test console i get the below fault.
    <faultcode>soapenv:Server</faultcode>
    <faultstring>BEA-380000: Length Required</faultstring>
    <detail>
    After some debugging i find that the content length http header is missing from the outbound message the business process creates and sends to the acutal web service which sends back the http 411 fault.
    Does anyone know how to configure the message flow of my proxy service to ensure that the outbound message sent from the business service contains that content length http header or any suggestions on how to fix this issue will be appreciated.
    Thanks

    Disable the "Use Chunked Streaming Mode" property in HTTP Transport Configuration of your business service. By default it remains enabled.
    Regards,
    Anuj

  • Column name missing from a View

    I tried to create a view based on another view but the column header is missing from the view.
    The view was create with the following statement:
    create view TEST.MDQ_VU_TEST2 (FXT_BANKCODE, FXT_FCY, FXT_FXINDICATOR, SUMFXT_FXFCYAMT, SUMFXT_FXLCYAMT, CASESTMT) as
    SELECT MDQ_VU_POS.FXT_BANKCODE,
    MDQ_VU_POS.FXT_FCY,
    MDQ_VU_POS.FXT_FXINDICATOR,
    MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXFCYAMT,
    MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXLCYAMT,
    ROUND( CASE WHEN (MDQ_VU_POS.CCY_BASE_CURRENCY = '1')
                THEN CASE WHEN (MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXFCYAMT = 0)
                          THEN MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXFCYAMT
                          ELSE MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXLCYAMT / MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXFCYAMT
                     END
                WHEN (MDQ_VU_POS.CCY_BASE_CURRENCY <> '1')
                THEN CASE WHEN (MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXLCYAMT = 0)
                          THEN MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXLCYAMT
                          ELSE MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXFCYAMT / MDQ_VU_POS.SUMFXT_FXLCYAMT
                     END
                ELSE 0
           END, MDQ_VU_POS.CCY_FXDECIMAL_PLACES) CASESTMT
    FROM TEST.MDQ_VU_POS;The view is created successfully, but the last column name does not appear as show below
    View TEST.MDQ_VU_TEST2:
      Columns:
        FXT_BANKCODE                    VARCHAR2 (12) INLINE NOT NULL
        FXT_FCY                         VARCHAR2 (3) INLINE NOT NULL
        FXT_FXINDICATOR                 VARCHAR2 (1) INLINE NOT NULL
        SUMFXT_FXFCYAMT                 NUMBER NOT NULL
        SUMFXT_FXLCYAMT                 NUMBER NOT NULL
                                        NUMBER NOT NULLAnyone knows why TimesTen unable to get the alias name for that particular column ?
    Thanks is advance.
    Regards,
    Gary

    Thanks Gary - I tried it on 11.2.2.2.0 64bit on Linux x86/64 but it again succeeded for me. That's probably due to my mocked up base table versus your real world definition.
    Would you be able to open an SR so we can investigate this properly? We'd need:
    ttCapture off the instance (so we get the correct DSN definition)
    base table and indexes SQL definition - a ttSchema taken off the datastore would suffice.
    Thanks.

  • Heading level hierarchy errors when topics are in TOC more than once

    I have discovered that the hierarchy in the Heading levels in
    the Printed Documentation will differ from than in my online help
    table of contents hierarchy, and that the problem is due to topics
    that are intentionally in the TOC more than once.
    For example, in chapter 5 of a particular help system the
    hierarchy should be:
    Heading 1 < Chapter 5 title from top-level book>
    Heading 2 <title of second level book>
    Heading 3 <title of topic that appears under second-level
    book>*
    What I actually get is:
    Heading 1 < Chapter title from top-level book>
    Heading 2 <title of second level book>
    Heading 4 <title of topic that appears under second-level
    book>*
    * This same topic appeared in an earlier chapter. In that
    chapter it was really at a Heading 4 level.
    Due to company styles, etc. we use a numbering system at the
    headings and in the TOC, so instead of
    5
    5.1
    5.1.1
    I erroneously get
    5
    5.1
    5.1.1.1
    This type of hierarchy issue appears multiple times in this
    particular document (which I inherited by the way.)
    Other than restructuring the document to not reuse topics in
    different places in the TOC, is there a solution or a workaround
    for this problem?
    What I am doing so far, is generating the Print Documentation
    one chapter at a time. As long as a topic is not reused with the
    same chapter, my hierarchy of heading levels is maintained;
    otherwise, it is not. Then I can put the chapters back together
    after fixing the few places that still have heading level problems.
    This however, will be quite cumbersome as this document is
    translated into nine other languages.
    I am using RoboHelp X5 for Word / Word 2003 for the source
    and most of the translations; RoboHelp Asian Edition, Simplified
    Chinese / Word 2003 for the Chinese translation. The heading level
    hierarchy error occurs in both versions.

    >> AF: I've commented in sections...
    Without Maintain Heading Levels, RH will apply heading levels
    to the books and then the topic levels will get bumped down. So a
    top level book will be Heading 1 and the Headings in the topic will
    get bumped down to 2, 3 and 4 etc. If then you have another book
    one level down so that it gets Heading 2 applied, the same topic
    but under the level two book would then get 3, 4 and 5 applied.
    That is not the original problem but hopefully we are agreed
    that is how things work on that.
    >> Yes - that is the expected behavior. When it didn't
    happen as expected, that's what led me to the discovery of the
    cause of the problem (topic reuse).
    Your problem was that firstly Heading 3 got bumped to Heading
    4 if the same topic was inserted into the TOC twice. I assume it
    was OK in the first instance, or is it that when you add it twice
    it goes wrong everywhere?
    >> Your assumption is correct. First occurrence is
    correct. Second, third, and fourth (yes - there is one topic that
    is used 4 times! ) are not correct based on TOC hierarchy.
    On the numbering, nothing surprises me. If you look at my
    site you will see that for RH HTML, i gave up on getting it right.
    I have had many queries on this and more than a few people have
    indicated they will work on the problem and get it working. I'm
    still waiting. There are many posts about outline numbering
    problems. Has anyone got it working satisfactorily?
    >> I don't really have numbering problems. The
    numbering is following the RoboHelp-generated hierarchy and the
    .dot template that I apply. It's just that the RH-generated
    hierarchy and its heading levels don't correspond to the "real"
    hierarchy because of the reuse issue.
    I have seen various Word gurus maintain that numbering has
    not worked entirely satisfactorily since Word 2! Also enough posts
    to convince me this is a Word issue, not a RH issue.
    If you want to create a new project and knock something up
    that demonstrates this problem, by all means zip it up and send it.
    I'll assume it will be a small project and zip to less than 5mb. If
    more, contact me first.
    >> Unless you have RoboHelp X3 Asian Edition,
    Simplified Chinese, there is really no need. I plan to either avoid
    the reuse issue in the source, or build the print doc in sections
    which is easy enough in RoboHelp X5 for the non-Chinese languages.
    It is in the older Asian edition where the problems are compounded
    by the omitted reuse topics. If you do have RoboHelp X3 Asian
    Edition, Simplified Chinese and want to experiment, I can send you
    a cut-down version of the project. Don't feel obligated though;
    unless you can read Chinese (I can't) it is very tedious to work
    with.

  • Attachments at header level from SRM BI/BID  to ECC PO

    Hello All,
    Our landscape is SRM 5.0sp09 & backend ECC 6.0.
    SRM tech scenario - CLASSIC
    SRM business scenario - Sourcing with Bid Invitation
    We have set up DMS in ECC and are now able to transfer item level attachments from SRM BI and BID to ECC follow-on PO.
    Our customer desires header level attachments since they want to avoid DMS maintainance.
    We have checked this with sap OSS and the responce was---
    <b>this is a limitation/desired behavior. SRM is not
    passing the attachments as the same cannot be viewed at header level in
    PO(as indicated by you). Hence only the item level attachments are
    passed. I am not sure if the same is taken care in SRM 6.0.</b>
    Our customer is still insisting for header level attachments.
    Can anybody give relevant inputs?
    BR
    Dinesh

    Hi Dinesh,
    I am not sure about the exact technical details of the same. But i just know that SRM50 will not support this functionality. Sorry that i am not able to help you in this regard
    Hope we will get some other reply here....
    Thanks & Best Regards
    Raj

  • Modify Partner Function from Header level to Item level

    Hello experts,
    A help please!!!
    Scenery:
    I need to have: - When I create a Sales Order, I can have differents Carrier Partner Fuction for each line.
    Currently we have a Partner Function (Carrier) defined at Header Level.
    I need to modify it in order to have a Carrier Partner at Item Header.
    Many Thanks all,
    Barbara

    Hello Barbara,
    Go to SPRO - SD - Basic Functions - Partner Determination - Set Up Partner Determination -
    Select - Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Header
    Select TA - Standard Order & select "Partner Functions in Procedure" from left side.
    Go to the Partner Function of Carrer & make sure that there is NO TICK MARK in the "Not Modifiable" check box. (This will let you change the Carrier at Header level also, if required.
    Go to SPRO - SD - Basic Functions - Partner Determination - Set Up Partner Determination -
    Select - Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Item
    Select N - Standard Item & Select "Partner Functions in Procedure" from left side.
    Go to New Entries & Enter Carrier Partner Function & make sure that there is NO TICK MARK in the "Not Modifiable" check box. This will let you change the Carrier at Item level.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Jignesh Mehta

  • PCUI: Dates missing from header: Financing Quotations

    Hi there,
    In the CRM backend, in the header level, there are the dates information, however in the PCUI application, I can't seem to find the dates at the header level, for some reason this is hidden from the standard PCUI. Can someone shed some light on this?
    I can only think that the screen structure is CRMT_BSP_LAMF_DATES      and the MAC is CL_CRM_BSP_AM_HEADOM_1O....
    Please help!
    Thanks,
    Josh

    Hello Josh,
    Do you want the date to be displayed in the OIC2 I mean in the search result area or you are taking about the header details that gets displayed in CRM 5.0 detailed area.
    Regards,
    Hemanth

  • Can we perform Progress Order option from Order Header level?

    Hi,
    Can any one let me know about the basic functionality of Progress Order and on which scenario we can apply this option and also please clarify me the below doubt.
    Our Functionality as follows:
    1. Once the Order is booked then Credit Hold is applied against to the Order at the Order Header Level
    2. We are releasing the Hold from Actions tab
    3. Now we are placing the cursor at each Line Level and Progressing the Order using the Progress Order Option to fulfill and close the Sales Order lines.
    Now what my doubt is Credit Hold is applied at Order level but we are performing the Progress Order option from Level. When I try to user the same option from Order Header level system is showing the following error message “APP-ONT-251015: There are no eligible activities to be completed. There is at least one deferred or externally notifiedactivity in this workflow. Please see the workflow monitor or status window for more information” because of this I am using progress order option for each line.
    I want Progress Order option to applicable for entire Order so that I can fulfill and close all Lines at one time.
    What is the best way to Progress Order for entire Order instead of selecting each line to Progress the Order.
    Please share your views.
    Regards,
    Kevin.

    Hi Kevin,
    I am not quite sure if I understood your issue correctly but if you are using R12, there is a check box available called "Progress Workflow" on Holds definition, which will progress the entire order.
    With Regards,
    Vishal Majithia

  • RFX Response Header : Fill Display Fields on Header Level

    Hi Gurus,
    There is a requirement at the client place to add the Display only field for RFx Response Header. Based on this required I have done the following activities.
    1. From 'Define Customer Display Fields on Header Level' in  SPRO i have appended the ZFIELD in the Response header structure.
    2. From 'Configure Control for Fields on Header Level' in SPRO i have made it visible true.
    3. From 'Fill Display Fields on Header Level' SPRO i have Enhanced the /SAPSRM/BD_PDO_FE_FILL_HEADER with implementation. And have given required filter criteria. In the implementation Class it has the return parameter as CS_HEADER_DATA. Where i could fill the my ZFIELD.
    The field is now displaying in the SRM portal. But the problem is that the ZFIELD is not being filled with any value, even though i supplied it.
    Is there any step that is missing to set the value?
    Regards,
    Hobs

    Hi,
    The main technique is to do your calculations in PAI of the screen for additional data B for the line item but as you said it is accessed only when you goto-> item -> additional dataB
    So you can do one more thing...do the calculation in PAI/PBO of the screen first and in userexit_save_document_prepare recalculate again and overwrite the old ones(or calculate for only the ones which are initial in the item) ..so if he goes to additional data B screen you give the user what he wants and if he doesn't userexit_save_document_prepare takes care of it
    user can go to additional dataB only a line item at a time so the chance that he takes all the line items one by one is less(for huge number of line items)..so you just calculate and overwrite the fields in the in the userexit if the field value is empty...or you can recalculate for all the cases and overwrite just in case there may be a problem....
    in the screen of the additional dataB
    Write logic for calculating the field values
    so in the userexit you write like
    if the fields are initial..
    calculate
    else
    *already calculated from the screen because user has viewed it
    endif.
    So you are safe that user can see what he wants and you can reassure that the value will be calculated and stored on the SAVE from user exit
    Please check,revert
    Reward if helpful
    Regards
    Byju

  • Multiple selection customer field at header level... Is it possible?

    Y'all,
    I would like to know if it's possible to append a table into the include structure (CUF) at header level in the contract and create a search help screen with multiple selection values return.
    This requirement comes because we have to mantain a 1:N relationship between a contract and customer field at header level.
    If you have any idea or comment please let me know.
    Best regards,
    Jerry.

    Hi
    <u>I have not tried, but seems to be possible.</u>
    <b>Please go through the SAP OSS Notes -></b>
    Note 672960 - User-defined fields 2
    Note 762984 - SRM40-SUS: Implementation of customer enhancement fields
    Note 882256 - SRM-SUS: Customer fields for SUS invoice header missing
    Note 749196 - SRM40-SUS: SP01 Redefining UI settings
    Note 809628 - Table like customer fields from bid invitation in bid
    Note 809630 - Customer field in bid invitation and bid - How does it work?
    Note 458591 - User-defined fields: Preparation and use
    Hope this will help. Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

Maybe you are looking for