Hide indesign instance (Hide running application)

Hi
I am creating indesign instance using this code
INDESIGN::_Application oApplication;
oApplication.CreateDispatch(L"InDesign.Application") ==0);
Indesign application start successfully.
I want to hide the application means when i create instance then application should not visible
and run in backside.
for example
Dim objWord As Word.Application
Dim objDoc As Word.Document
Set objWord = New Word.Application
objWord.Visible = FALSE;
There is a Application property visible to set application visible.
i am using indesign.h and indesign.cpp file created from .tlb file of CS5(7.5).
In my .h and .cpp file there is no application visible function or application class property

The InDesign appliction's visible property is read only. Try to use minimize method like so:
app.documents[0].layoutWindows[0].minimize(); // this is JS, in VB it will be similar

Similar Messages

  • Hide an application so it can't be brought to front without a password...

    I've been searching for a solution to this problem: I would like to be able to hide a running application, so that it a password is required to access the application in the foreground again.
    So far, I have searched without results. Does anyone have an solution? It doesn't have to be elegant...
    Thanks in advance for any help on this.

    Hi Anton,
    when your window form load;
    my code is in VB,
    Me.WindowState = FormWindowState.Maximized
            Me.CenterToScreen()
            Me.WindowState = FormWindowState.Normal
            Me.TopMost = True
    hope this helps,
    nd.Q

  • Hide Running Apps from Standard Users

    Hello
    How can i hide running apps from a standard user?
    Ex
    I would like to have team viewer running in the background so anytime i want i can administrate the mac ..But if the user quit from app i'm not able to log in.
    So i'm thinking to make him unable to quit from the app either have the app running in the background..
    Any ideas?
    Thnx

    Be aware that the major difficulty in using your own encryption routines is key management.
    - If you store the key in the database, the DBA can obviously just call the appropriate decrypt routine, pass in the key, and see the data
    - If you store the key outside the database but expose it somehow in a way the database can see, you've got the same problem.
    - If you store the key outside the database in a way the database cannot access, then only the applications that know how to access the database and know how to access the key can decrypt the data. That can be annoying if you try to use a reporting package or other third party software that needs to see decrypted data and doesn't know how to decrypt the data. You'd also have to make sure that the DBA doesn't have access to whatever machine you're storing the key on for other reasons (i.e. because the DBA is the backup to the admin)
    - If you don't store the key at all, you can force users to pass it in when they want to decrypt data. That obviously runs the risk that someone forgets the password because not enough people know it or that so many people know it that its no longer a secret.
    - Plus, you have to deal with things like figuring out how you revoke/ change a key, how you synchronize backups of the database with backups of the key without DBA intervention, etc.
    These tend to be much harder problems than figuring out how to encrypt the data on the way in.
    Justin

  • Sticky hide show - application

    Dear all,
    I justed installed the sticky hide show - application to take advantage of the ajax and dhtml logic, but when I try to run the application or single pages I always get the ORA-01722: invalid number error message and I don't know the reason for that. My apex version is compatible with this demo version.
    Thanks
    Jens

    Rhodri
    Hi. Sorry post not clear - is exactly the same issue - get 'ORA-01722: invalid number'. on one ApEx installation but not on another. In fact this applies to the demo app that downloads from OTN for the sticky windows as well as our app after adding the "sticky" functionality.
    Mentioned page 101 as this is a system generated page (easily allows reproduction of the error in a test app) and this localises the 'ORA-01722 error in the process added as part of the sticky show-hide implementation. The only element of the "sticky" implemented by this point in the (first) app page is the application process triggered at page "On Load". See my post:
    If you set the app to use the Application Express authentication scheme and
    then run it, you get the error on page 101, followed by the process error
    message inserted for the SHOW_HIDE_OUTPUT "On Load" process. This
    implies the problem is in the show_hide_collection_output procedure in the
    package.You can check out the show_hide_collection_output procedure in the package using the apex object browser or sql*developer - its the one called at the point the error is generated.. The installed package supporting the sticky implementation is called "show_hide_memory"
    Cheers, Dave

  • I want to hide an application so that it doesn't show up on the iPhone (4S w/ iOS 6.1) or on the Apps screen when I sync my iPhone to the computer.  I used to be able to do this before the upgrade.  Is there a way?

    Before I upgraded to iOS 6, there was a way to hide an application on my phone.  When you did this is only showed up in Featured Apps in the App Store and specifically, would only appear in "Hidden Apps".  Also, the app wouldn't show up at all on my device when I sync to the computer.  I can't figure out how to hide an app anymore.  Can anyone help?  Oh and I'm talking about purchased apps...not the ones that come standard with the iPhone.

    Seems that you can no longer hide them on your phone.  Try doing so in iTunes: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4919.

  • My Bridge CC opens in a locked mode - I cannot make any changes (dump cache) - it says "other instances of Adobe Application Manager are running, which must be closed." I have to force quit Bridge to get out of it. I tried to uninstall Bridge and re-insta

    My Bridge CC opens in a locked mode - I cannot make any changes (dump cache) - it says "other instances of Adobe Application Manager are running, which must be closed." I have to force quit Bridge to get out of it. I tried to uninstall Bridge and re-install it but it did the same thing. Any ideas where to go next?
    The fact that I uninstalled Bridge and reloaded it has me concerned as to what to do next.?

    You need to force quit all other (real or fake) instances of the Application Manager.  Instructions differ between Mac or Win.
    A lot more information about your hardware and software is needed.
    BOILERPLATE TEXT:
    If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
    such as your platform (Mac or Win),
    exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CC", but something like CC2014.v.2.2) and of Bridge,
    your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
    the type of file you were working on,
    machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
    what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
    what error message(s) you receive,
    if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
    if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
    a screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too,
    etc.,
    someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster, who is not a Windows user).
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    Thanks!

  • Only letting one instance of my application run

    hi guys,
    My application will allow the user to interact with the database. The database will be stored on a local machine, and not on a network, so that only one person can access it at a time.
    The problem is, I believe a user can launch two instances of my application simultaneously, and therefore there are potential problems.
    So I want the user to only ever be able to launch one instance of the JFrame through which all interactions to the DB are made.
    So MyApp.java contains
    class MyApp
    public void main (String[] args)
    MyFrame mF = new MyFrame();
    }Now, is it the right idea of mine to make mF singleton? Or is it the wrong approach?
    But what is confusing me is...if at the java prompt I type
    java MyApp
    and then I type, once again
    java MyApp
    will these two be treated as two completely different running of programs? Say I had mF as a singleton. Does this mean there can exist one instance of mF in each of my two different runnings of MyApp, or are the two somehow connected, which means that if I ran MyApp a second time theer'll be some sort of error cos mF already exists and cos it is a singleton, it can't exist twice?
    Sorry if I havent made myself clear. I'm very confused myself.
    Thanks.
    AU

    My application will allow the user to interact with
    the database. The database will be stored on a local
    machine, and not on a network, so that only one
    person can access it at a time.If using jdbc then local or remote only really effect your database driver choice not your code.
    The problem is, I believe a user can launch two
    instances of my application simultaneously,Yes.
    and therefore there are potential problems. Potential but not that difficult to avoid.
    So I want the user to only ever be able to launch one
    instance of the JFrame through which all interactions
    to the DB are made.If you think about responsibilities, then data integrity is not the responsibility of the UI, its the responsibility of the DBMS.
    Now, is it the right idea of mine to make mF
    singleton? Or is it the wrong approach?A Singleton will only ensure that a jre has a single instance. If you start multiple instances of the jre then there can be one instance of the application in each.
    The best solution is to use your databases normal locking process through the JDBC api
    The simplest solution is for your program to lock either the database, the table or the record you are interested in. You can do this by creating a lock record on a seperate table. If the insert fails to create the record, somebody else is already using the dataset. If it succeeds then is available. You will need a way to forcible clear the lock if your application stops unexpectedly.

  • HOW TO HIDE INSTALLED APPLICATIONS

    If i download and install any application and if i want nobody to know about that application, how to hide that application. Please help me

    For that you will need some 3rd Party Application.. Create another Folder and move all such applications there-in.. and you should be able to Password protact that folder...but the compatibility will depend upon your device. Check here after setting your Device Model...

  • Hide related application region/link in email notifications

    Hi,
    Any pointers to hide related applications region/links in email notifications?
    Thanks upfront for the help!!

    Hello,
    Please see:
    How To Remove The Notification Details Attachment From Html Notifications (Doc ID 273518.1)
    Thank you,
    Deborah Bourgeois
    Oracle Customer Support

  • How to deploy and run application in user created OC4J instance

    Hello friends,
    I have created my own OC4J instance in Application Server Control.Now,how can I deploy and run application in this newly created OC4J instance.I need your help,it's
    urgent.
    Regards
    Prasenjit

    Hi Andreas,
    Thanx for your prompt reply.Yes,I had deployed the '.ear'in that.But I am not able to run the program in
    browser.Could you please elaborate more precisely.I wouuld be obliged.
    Regards
    Prasenjit

  • Why does "Hide all Applications" not hide all applications?

    Currently, when I invoke the "Hide all Applications" action, it leaves some apps visible. This happens all the time with Safari if it is open. This is clearly a bug -- is there a workaround for it?

    found this link a helpful workaround! (hint: use Option key when selecting apps and it closes them off desktop so you're left only with the one app window you want - not all of them)
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=3517319&#3517319

  • Can't Install Flash Player, What does "Only a single instance of this application can run" mean?

    I try to follow the steps 1-3, as it shows. After it downloads, after step 2, a dialog box pops up saying “Open Executable File? Then it says it may contain viruses or malicious code and to be careful when opening file.  So I click OK, then step 3 occurs, file name lists as: install_flashplayer11x32_mssd_aih(2).exe.  So then I hit “Run”.  Then another dialog box pops up titling “UI_FlashPlayerInstaller”, and it says “Only a single instance of this application can run”, “OK”. I’ve checked to see if there is another version installed, but I don’t see any.  I am operating a Windows 32 Bit, FireFox,

    Download the full installer from this FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/thread/909550
    Save it to disk, then close all browser windows and run the downloaded installer.

  • Why I can't install adobe keep getting: "only a single instance of this application can run"?

    Hello, Can someone help me with Adobe Flash Player installation ?
    I have tried too many things to install it but keep getting this message " only a single  instance of this application can run. 
    I can't see any Adobe applications, I've tried deleting all files adobe and still nothing.
    I have opened the task manager and try to end the processes related to Adobe manually by selecting 'End Process' and then try to install it, but nothing happened.
    I've tried 'clean boot' but neither worked.I downloaded the 'Adobe unistaller' from the official page and the 'latest version of flash player' but it doesn't work!.
    I've also went on the Adobe website and it said this error message was due to the flash application but I deleted all of those files to and still nothing.
    I've got firefox and windows 7.

    If you haven't done so already, reboot your computer, then re-run the installer you downloaded.

  • Not able to install Adobe 17x32.Getting message  only a single instance of this application can run

    Sir,I can't install Adobe 17X32.I have      Win 7 system.All previous versions have been uninstalled and yet I am getting a message--ONLY A SINGLE INSTANCE OF THIS APPLICATION CAN RUN.How do I remedy the situation?
    Thanks,
    Message was edited by: Maria Vargas
    Removed personal email address, which should not be included in a public forum.

    Hi Viraj,
    Please try the offline installer posted at the bottom of the Installation problems | Flash Player | Windows page, in the 'Still having problems' section.
    Maria

  • "Only a single instance of this application can run" error when installing Flash

    I deleted Flash Player when trying to solve a Shockwave Flash Google Chrome issue, and after being unable to solve it I switched to Firefox. I now can't get the installer to open. I double-click on it, it asks me if I want to run it. I click Yes, then the window closes and the installer doesn't open. When I try running the installer again, I get the error message "Only a single instance of this application can run". I have tried everything. I closed Firefox, restarted my computer, and ran the Flash Player uninstaller. I am running Windows 8.1 64-bit with Mozilla Firefox and I am trying to run the latest version of Flash Players as of October 26 2014. Please help!

    The download link has moved since then: http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/latest/help/install_flash_player.exe

Maybe you are looking for