Hiding G/L Account field in MB21 (Reservations)

Hi Gurus,
Does anybody know which transcation I could use to hide the G/L Account field in the reservation transaction.
Many thanks,
John.

Hi,
It depends on the Movement Type which you select during creation of Reservation.
Go to transaction code OMCJ (For Goods Receipt related movment types) and OMBW (For Goods Issue / Transfer Postings related movement types) and hide the G/L Account.
Also you can do the field selection per movement types in OMJJ but this will work for transaction MIGO
But in case of Goods Issue Moement Types "GL Account" field will always appear in MB21, it is not possible to avoid this in MB21 by configuration.

Similar Messages

Hiding G/L Account field in MIGO transaction (Goods Issue)

Dear Gurus,
Anyone knows how I can hide the G/L account in the MIGO transaction (Goods Issue).
Thanks,
John.

Hi
Try it in Tcode OMBW
In that select the particular field and change it to suppress..
It will work
Regards,
raman

User defined accounting fields from SRM to ECC

Hi!
We are running SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 with classic scenario
We have defined some accounting fields in SRM into structure BBP_PDS_ACC in an
include INCL_EEW_PD_ACC_CSF. New fields are also defined in tables BBP_C_ACC_F
and in BBP_C_ACCFD. New fields are also defined in srpo accounting.
In ECC same fields are defind in include CI_COBL.
When I create manual reservation in ECC using transaction MB21, I can use new fields properly
and they are restored in table RKPF - reservation header level just like cost center.
However, when I order my shopping cart with values in new fields, the values are not transferred into backend. Standard fields like cost center transfer nicely, but non of the user defined fields do that.
We have BADi BBP_CREATE_BE_RS_NEW active with manual ACCT_MAN indicator on and
movement allowed indicator on. In BADi wehave managed to to pass value from structure
IS_SC_DOCUMENT-account to structure cs_rs1_document-is_rs_header, but still not getting values to the backend. Is there some mapping done after BADi or how its done?
thanks,

Hi,
Please check the note 458951. Hope this information would be of some help.
Regards,
Kalyan

New Field in MB21 transaction

Hi Experts,
Our's is a Public Sector implementation. Client would like to use Reservation for Goods Issue. While creating a reservation manually with transaction MB21(Movement Type 201), user would like to enter 'Cost Center', 'G/L account' and 'Fund'. But there is no 'Fund' field available in MB21. Can some one help me how can I bring Fund field to MB21.
Thanks in Advance.
Vikram

Hello Vikram,
The technical name of field Fund is FINCODE.
Sometimes, this field is not available because one customer subscreen. If in this subscreen this field is not available and this subscreen has the highest priority, the field will be not showed.
You can check your subscreens in the following menu in SPRO:
Materials Management
-> Inventory Management and Physical Inventory
-> Movement Types
-> Set Subscreen for Account Assignment (Coding) Block
In addition, you should check in the following menu from PSM if this field is allowed to be used:
SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> General Settings for Public Sector Management -> Basic Settings: Account Assignment Elements -> Activate Account Assignment Elements
There, field Fund must be marked.
I hope it helps
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Greyout GL A/C field in MB21

Hi Experts,
We have one scenario I want to Grey out the G L Account field in Transaction code MB21(Create Reservation)
While user create Reservation system not allow to change the G L Account field.
Regards
Aamir

Hi,
Please use customizing (SPRO: Materials Management, Inventory Management
and Physical Inventory, Settings for Enjoy Transactions, Field Selection
per Mvt Type) to apply the field "KONTO" for the movement types you
want to see field G/L account.
You can see this by executing the transaction SHD0 and entering
MIGO in the "Transaction" field. (if you have transaction variant you can check it here aswell)
> Click in the icon to display it.
> You will be back into the main selection screen. Click again in the
display icon.
> You will see here the variant. If you scroll down in the field list
you can maintain the field 'G/L account no.' (GOITEM-KONTO) as your requirement.
Best regards
Erika

G/L Field of MB21

Hi Experts,
We have one scenario I want to Grey out the G L Account field in Transaction code MB21(Create Reservation)
While user create Reservation system not allow to change the G L Account field.
Regards
Vishal G

Hi,
Normally you can suppres fields in customizing in transaction OMBW but
if the fields you want to hide or suppress are not avaliable in this
customizing you can´t hide them in the standard settings.
Other posibility is to create a transaction variant for hide the field.
I attached you a word document with an example that explain how to
create the transaction variant.
Best regards
Erika

Field enhancement in Reservation

Hi Friends,
How can I add new fields to the reservation transaction in MB21. I understand there may be some user exit or Badi for the same. has anyone ever used it. please throw some loght
thanks in advance

Hi
Application component: MM-IM-RS
In the transactions Create Reservation (MB21) and Change Reservation (MB22), it is now possible to prepopulate screen fields, or check the data entered in the dialog according to your own defined rules.
With the Business Add-In (BAdI) MB_RESERVATION_BADI, this is now possible for item data (but not at all for account assignment fields and is only restricted for header fields).
The Business Add-In offers two methods that are called on the item screen of transactions MB21 and MB22.
The method DATA_MODIFY is called before the user can make entries on the detail screen. It is therefore possible to prepopulate fields or postprocess entries from the multiple-entry screen.
In a second step, method DATA_CHECK can be used to check entries in header or item fields and output a message if necessary.
Regards
Antony

Report for finding G/L account per purchasing document / reservation

Is there a report to get a list of G/L account for Purchasing documents / Reservations? If not, can a new scope of list for any standard report such as ME2N / ME2B be created to include the G/L account list?

Hi,
As division is not header field of invoice it is not available in accounting document header as well. Thus it will not be available in any standard reports showning items per account. I'm affraid you need to develop your own report or try to extend existing using user-/customer-exits.
You can find more information in OSS note 13131.
Regards,
Marcin

Needed help in greying a out a field in mb21

hiii experts, i have got a requirement of greying out a field in mb21... the field is GL Account because sometimes users puts a GL in the entry and wrong GL is got hitted .... please provide steps how to do that.. providing a screenshot the field which is of mb21
Regards,
Abhay

SE93: Put the new tcode name and say create
Put some short text. Select variant transaction.
Choose your variant in the next screen and save:

Account field required for some users, not for others in URM when checking

I am running into a real show stopper. I have been working in our development database, and have tested checking in content multiple times with no problems. I recently turned it over to my users to begin testing and they can not even check in one document, because they receive an error stating that the account is required. I know just enough to be dangerous, so I am not quite sure how to solve this one. It makes no sense to me that on my check in screen, account is not required and yet on all of my users check in screens, not only is it required, but nothing they enter is accepted as a valid value, so they can't even get past it. I would just as soon not have account show up or be required, but have struggled with making that happen, since it is not a custom metadata field. It appears to be a delivered field used for security purposes? any help would be appreciated! Thanks.
One more thing that I noticed that may be helpful in diagnosing this is that my profile has no accounts, just #none,#all
whereas the user's profiles have a number of different accounts listed in their profile. Could this be part of the reason that they are forced to enter an account when checking in content and I am not?
If so, how can I get around this?
Edited by: user10985708 on Apr 7, 2009 12:21 PM

That´s a little strange behaviour becouse normally the account field is not required as default.
You could try a global rule setting the Account field not to be required with some IDOC.
But as you say you´re not using accounts anyway i´d suggest removing it from your server instance.
In the server\config\CONFIG.CFG file look for UseAccounts=true set it to false and the field won´t bother you anymore.

Populating the G/L account field based on Material in the SC

HI aLL,
We are runnin on SRM 4.0 (classic).I have a reqt wherein the G/L account which comes in the "Cost assignment details" should be populated at run time (when items are added to SC) based on the material no/Product ID....
I found out a BADI...BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT which is used to determine the G/L account but not sure at whci point this BADI is triggered...i inserted a poup message in a sample implementatiuon of this BADI..but it doesnt show me the popup message when i click on the "ADD TO SHOPPING CART" button on teh SC creatio screen wheerin i can test that this is the BADI which i s called at teh time items are added to teh SC and will populate the G/L account field with teh proper value form teh backend.
Also for the G/L account value for the Material,is there any std table which stores the link between product/valuation class and G/l account in SRM itself so that my RFC call to teh backend is saved in this BADI implementation??
regards,
Disha.

Hi Disha
Not sure if I understood you right. I've implemented this BAdI BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT and it works fine so far. I can add an item to the SC and then go to the item details to see the accounting data. There the G/L account corresponds to the one that was determined at run time by the BAdI implementation.
The standard table in R/3 backend is T030. For described requirements (no known material id) you have to specify a product category. Valuation classes can be assigned to product categories in table T023 (in R/3 backend as well).
Unfortunately the SRM standards do not take into account the standard account determination as it is known and working in R/3 systems. For this you'll have to implement the BAdI BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT.
Maybe this thread is of interest for you?
How to have backend account determination working SRM
HTH
Renaud

How to use "Mail Merge for Word" to include only Account fields?

We're attempting to use the Mail Merge for Word template to create a document containing several fields from the Account object. We do not need any fields from the Contact object, and there are many contacts linked to each account.
When choosing "Get On Demand Data > Accounts", removing all the [Contacts] fields, selecting the necessary [Accounts] fields, then clicking "OK", a "List Download in Progress" window appears, followed by one that says "Microsoft Word - Subscript out of range". None of the [Accounts] fields are available in the downloaded data.
Can anyone tell me how to include the appropriate Account fields without any Contact fields (which pulls a separate Merge record for every Contact linked with the selected Account)?
Thanks.

Thanks for trying to help with this.
So far, we've been unable to pull even a SINGLE account record. So the problem is not related to data volume limitations. The tool seems to require that Contacts are selected, but for this application we only want a single merge document per Account.
If anyone else has had success using the Mail Merge for Word tool to pull only Account data, please give us your guidance. Thanks.

Disable G/L account field in Shopping cart screen

Hi SDN,
I am ABAP Developer and new to the SRM system, I got a requirement to disable G/L account field in the Shopping cart creation screen and overview screen and also I have to disable the message that is triggered when the G/L account field not entered .
Please guide me to achieve this requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Srinivas D.

Hi,
I guess you use current SRM 7.0 version.
You can control the field visibility by Meta Data customizing. SRM -> SRM Server -> Cross-Application Basic settings -> Extensions and Field Control(Personalization) -> Configure Field Control.
Regards,
Masa

GL account field Not Updated in Special Purpose ledger

Hi Experts,
We are using 4.7 Version in which we found difference in particular Month difference between FS10N and GD13 and GD20 Line Items of Particular Leder.
We Observed that the Documents are posted but , without being updating the GL Account field column. GL account field column is Blank and Hence it has not been carryforward to Subsequent years.
Our Questions
1) How It had happened, becase all the documents are updated except the 2 documents .
2) Is there any way to update GL account field in the Mentioned Documents.
3) Or do we need to Reverse the document and post again.
How to proceed on this issue.
regards
N.Kumar

I cannot answer question 1 but I can shed some light on the following ones.
There are methods to identify and correct Special Ledger document inconsistencies. Usually when I have SPL inconsistencies (such as a blank fund in the SPL document), It is caught quickly and I take the action to reverse the source document and re-post again. That would be my suggestion to follow if at all possible for your two documents.
If you take a look at notes 764523 and 697068, you will see the reports used to analyze and correct the inconsistencies. Read the notes thoroughly and look at report RGUREP13 in particular.
If your issue is re-occurring then you should get SAP to look into the matter via OSS and perhaps they could determine the cause.

Disable GL Account Field for editing in the Shopping Cart SRM 7.0

Hi,
We would like to disable the GL Account field for editing only on the Shopping Cart Approval Screen. I tried to implement this through configuration of Metadata Dynamic Class in SPRO->SRM Application Server ->Cross Application Basic Settings->Extension & Field Control ->Configure Control for Fields of substructure. But the class is not getting triggered.
Any help would be appreciated. We are on SRM 7.0
Thanks
Raghav

Hi Rohit,
Try to activate the view and component and then see. If this does not works, create an enhancement for the view and write the below code in method WDDOMODIFYVIEW
DATA btn_confirm TYPE REF TO cl_wd_button.
btn_confirm ?= view->get_element( 'AUTO_CONFIRMATION' ).
if btn_confirm is BOUND.
btn_confirm->SET_TEXT( value = 'Confirmation' ).
endif.
This code will set the button text as 'Confirmation' .
Regards,
Anubhav

Hiding G/L Account field in MB21 (Reservations)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for