Hierarchical Library

Sorry if i'm in the wrong place and/or this topic was already open, i didn't find it. It's my first time here.
Will iTunes implement the function to choose from the classic view style of the library and a hierarchical view style?
The reason why i still don't use iTunes it's because i dislike the library, as i got lots of albums (and no spare files), and it's a problem for me to browsing/searching music to play, instead going by the tree structure...

Sorry, David, but if you're asking about whether some future version of iTunes might have any given feature, no one here could answer since no one outside of Apple knows anything about future product releases. Anything anyone here would post would be pure speculation which isn't allowed here (the Discussions are for technical support on existing products). There are a number of rumor sites which you can read, but as to whether any rumors they report have any validity, your guess will be as good as ours.
I presume you've discovered the Browse, which lists artists and albums in two top windows, allowing you to view only a single artists albums, and then only the tracks in that album?

Similar Messages

Need a Hierarchical Tree-type library for Nodes

Is there a good library out there (perhaps in java itself?) that will allow me to create Heirarchies of data using nodes? Kinda like C's glib GNode class maybe?
In other words, I need to be able to make nodes, give them information, add them to parent nodes, add children to them, find nodes, get all nodes at a certain level, etc.
Thanks for any pointers.

Thanks, I'll take a look at this, but just to make sure I'm not missing out, does anyone know of any other implementations that are better than this? More optimized or something? (I gotta check all my options)

Report performance with Hierarchies

Hi
How to improve query performance with hierarchies. We have to do lot of navigation's in the query and the volume of data size very big.
Thanks
P G

HI,
chk this:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1955ba90-0201-0010-d3aa-8b2a4ef6bbb2
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
Query Performance Is "Aggregates" the way out for me?
/people/vikash.agrawal/blog/2006/04/17/query-performance-150-is-aggregates-the-way-out-for-me
° the OLAP cache is architected to store query result sets and to give all users access to those result sets.
If a user executes a query, the result set for that querys request can be stored in the OLAP cache; if that same query (or a derivative) is then executed by another user, the subsequent query request can be filled by accessing the result set already stored in the OLAP cache.
In this way, a query request filled from the OLAP cache is significantly faster than queries that receive their result set from database access
° The indexes that are created in the fact table for each dimension allow you to easily find and select the data
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/1a6473e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/content.htm
° when you load data into the InfoCube, each request has its own request ID, which is included in the fact table in the packet dimension.
This (besides giving the possibility to manage/delete single request) increases the volume of data, and reduces performance in reporting, as the system has to aggregate with the request ID every time you execute a query. Using compressing, you can eliminate these disadvantages, and bring data from different requests together into one single request (request ID 0).
This function is critical, as the compressed data can no longer be deleted from the InfoCube using its request IDs and, logically, you must be absolutely certain that the data loaded into the InfoCube is correct.
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ca/aa6437e7a4080ee10000009b38f842/content.htm
° by using partitioning you can split up the whole dataset for an InfoCube into several, smaller, physically independent and redundancy-free units. Thanks to this separation, performance is increased when reporting, or also when deleting data from the InfoCube.
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/33/dc2038aa3bcd23e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Hope it helps!
tHAK YOU,
dst

Right way to manage ADF Library Dependencies

Hi,
I am working on an application where we are trying to components in individual Libraries for re-usability and logical grouping.
These jar files are then imported into parent projects which can result in different levels of dependency hierarchies.
From what I have seen there are different ways of importing components / libraries onto a project.
1. We can directly drag a component like Data control (from Data Control palette) from one project to a page on another (for example from a model project to a ui project)
2. Deploy the model project as a ADF library jar, go to the resource palette, create a connection, right click on the library and do an add to project.
3. From the resource palette, expand the library structure, locate the Data control and drag it onto the page of the parent project
My question is:
a> What is the difference between these three ways of importing components from one project to the other.
b> Which is the best way for deployment and future maintenance.
thanks
Edited by: user595592 on Aug 12, 2011 5:18 AM

1. We can directly drag a component like Data control (from Data Control palette) from one project to a page on another (for example from a model project to a ui project)This will be applicable if you have a dependiency.. ro you have an adf library reference for your project..
datacontrol - Business components referenced in bc4j.cfg
other datacontrlols will be defined in DataBindings.cpx file
2. Deploy the model project as a ADF library jar, go to the resource palette, create a connection, right click on the library and do an add to project.This is through file connection.. This is the most prompt way of adding libraries.. to the project.. so that there wont be an absolute references..
3. From the resource palette, expand the library structure, locate the Data control and drag it onto the page of the parent projectagain same as poiint 2.. but for datacontrol..
a> What is the difference between these three ways of importing components from one project to the other. point 1 say dependecies.. in a single applicatioon between different project.. absoultely fine..
point 2.. will alway go with relative path.. and have an advantage of not having absolute path..
point 3. si same as 2
b> Which is the best way for deployment and future maintenanceI will suggest you to go for 2.. as its the standard way of adding libraries..

How can I move my old iPhoto library into a Referenced Library format and use that as my default?

Hi, I have been using iPhoto for photo management where all the jpegs have been living, in organized events by date and subject for some time. I recently upgraded to aperture and am using the same iPhoto library. The issue I have is that I use Carbonite for my cloud back up and I am able to look at the pictures I have on my PC with the same folder organization I have them on my PC hard drive. This is apparently not possible for iPhoto library. The only way to access a picture on the iPhoto library in the cloud is to go through the master and hope you can find the specific picture since they are not organized in a comprehensible manner (like events or folders) in there.
So the only solution I can think of is to move the current iPhoto library to a referenced image library and use that as my default library from now on. This way I get cloud access and the events will hopefully turn into folders with dates and subjects that I can continue to keep organized to satisfy my OCD tendencies.
So the question I have is that:
1. How can I make a reference Library for Aperture/iPhoto?
2. How do I move the current library to the Referenced Library in an Organized manner? My wish list would be a series of folders labeled with the date and the subject, like I have in my iPhoto library right now.
3. If there is any alternative, your suggestions and recommendations would be much appreciated.
My computer: Mac Mini (Mid 2012), Lion, 16GB RAM.
Thank you kindly,

Or is there a way to go through aperture to make a new reference library that I can move the masters into later?
you do not move the masters into a references library - you turn your current library into a referenced library. As Terence Devlin said:
File -> Relocate Masters
What you should set up:
Select a folder, where you want to store your referenced files - probably on an external drive.
Decide on a hierarchical folder structure inside this folder - that is completely up to you.
Select a project from your library and use the command "File -> Relocate Masters/Originals" to move the original image files to the folder where you want to go them to. Only take care not to send two projects to the same folder.
Alternatively, if you do not care about the folder structure Aperture will use, select all images at once from the "Photos" view and let Aperture decide how to assing the folders - in the "Relocate Originals" dialoge you can specify a subfolder format.
Regards
Léonie

How do I move photos from iPhoto Library to Finder?

When I got my Mac I wasn't sure how to transfer photos from my PC. I made the mistake of importing about 1/2 of them, abt. 19,000 into iPhoto.
I prefer to use Photoshop Elements and a hierarchical file system, ie. Pictures>Critters>wild birds>owls>Great Grey etc. None of iPhoto's little tricks like facial recognition are useful to me.
Can I just go into the iPhoto Library package and drag the Masters folder into my Pictures folder, then uninstall iPhoto?

You can use Photoshop and the external editor from within iPhoto for seamless editing with PS. Just note the warnings in red in Step 3. Othere than that you have the best of both worlds.
Using Photoshop or Photoshop Elements as Your Editor of Choice in iPhoto.
1 - select Photoshop or Photoshop Elememts as your editor of choice in iPhoto's General Preference Section's under the "Edit photo:" menu.
2 - double click on the thumbnail in iPhoto to open it in Photoshop. When you're finished editing click on the Save button. If you immediately get the JPEG Options window make your selection (Baseline standard seems to be the most compatible jpeg format) and click on the OK button. Your done.
3 - however, if you get the navigation window
that indicates that PS wants to save it as a PS formatted file. You'll need to either select JPEG from the menu and save (top image) or click on the desktop in the Navigation window (bottom image) and save it to the desktop for importing as a new photo.
This method will let iPhoto know that the photo has been editied and will update the thumbnail file to reflect the edit..
NOTE: With Photoshop Elements the Saving File preferences should be configured as shown:
I also suggest the Maximize PSD File Compatabilty be set to Always. In PSE’s General preference pane set the Color Picker to Apple as shown:
Note 1: screenshots are from PSE 10
Note: to switch between iPhoto and PS or PSE as the editor of choice Control (right)-click on the thumbnail and select either Edit in iPhoto or Edit in External Editor from the contextual menu. If you use iPhoto to edit more than PSE re-select iPhoto in the iPhoto General preference pane. Then iPhoto will be the default editor and you can use the contextual menu to select PSE for your editor when desired.
However, it may be that iPhoto is not the application for you.

Aperture Library/Database hacks

After one week playing around with aperture, i want to share my current insights with 'customizing' (my) aperture's way of dealing with my picture files.
Warning:
The following thoughts and arrangements are working for me, they're
undoubtly NOT supported by apple and the programmers of the aperture
application!
Reading a lot of articles in the forum when aperture hit the masses, i've been disappointed about how aperture will fit with me.
Over the years my growing picture collection moved over from one computer to the other, deploying more storage, and will continue to do so in the future. So the technical equipment has to be independent from the treasure's of my data, to follow state of the art hard- and software development.
For me, aperture approved to be of such a kind.
Despite aperture stores away all my digital masters into it's own Library, thus duplicating data during imports, it just brings in some kind of more detailed
directory hierarchies to my way of organizing my picture library. How does it do?
How do i store my Library?
Sorry to be that longish, but to explain my concepts i have to.
Modern operating systems distinguish private/personal and public/common data for their file storage locations. Hopefully they follow the 'FHS' (Filesystem-Hierarchical-Standard) brought up by linux, to name the diverse locations for classified data.
I do run mixed os'es within my networks, as no computer should be isolated from a networked environment anymore. But to be honest it's more a single-user situation in reality, then the multi-user aspects i always keep in mind when designing my infrastructure environment for a network.
My picture library/online-archive is classified 'common' data, so it stores outside my home-directory, and every user allowed to, has access to it. I do not support locales within my filenaming-conventions, users and me are german-spoken, so the 'common' data for my systems is always called
'/Bibliothek'.
Furthermore we're dealing with pictures (Bild), movies (Film), music (Musik) and documents (Dokumente) in all common used operting systems (os x, windows), storing private data to the home-directory within appropiate directories and public/common data to the equivalent directories at a common storage.
/Bibliothek
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv
/Bibliothek/Filmarchiv
/Bibliothek/Musikarchiv
BTW, i customized windows to reflect this filetree within explorer windows, so users click to 'Eigene Bilder' (my pictures) and 'Bildarchiv' (common pictures) there, to change between directories, making it very convenient to work with.
Especially the 'common' picture files are strongly organized by date, which is reflected at the directory-structure, for example:
'/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/2004/2004-04-17, make a good description/'
'/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/2005/2005-12-00, a bunch for the whole period/'
A descriptive directory name is highly portable between operating systems, applications and last but not least, users!
For now, aperture seems to be pretty much a single-user solution.
But it's library can be 'distributed' to accomodate my needs.
I started to import my data by drag'n'drop, which works best for me. I didn't like the import assistent, which seemed to result in a different structure of my data in aperture's 'all projects' list. By creating a folder in aperture for the year, then drag'n'drop the multi-selected directories from the finder, i got within aperture:
All Projects + * (<-Aperture)
<div class="jive-quote">Library (smart-albums, collapsed)
2005 (folder)
2005-11-00 (folder, nested)
2005-11-17, sample bla (project, from directory)
Images from 2005-11-17, sample bla (album, inherited)
2005-12-08, take a better name (project)
Images from 2005-12-08, take a better name
Using aperture's preferences to switch between libraries i did import to different aperture libraries for the years, resulting in a bunch of directories, each holding an 'Aperture Library.aplibrary' paket there.
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/2004/2004.aplibrary
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/2005/2005.aplibrary
Yes, the pakets can be renamed, to better reflect whats in there. Aperture has to be restarted to change from one library to another!
The total amount of imported data, yet: 130 GB, ~33164 pics.
I am working with a 15" powerbook, 1,5gb ram, 80 gb hdd on the road and a 200gb external drive at home/office.
to make me feel comfortable with aperture, i switched to (terminal hacking!):
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/2004/ ->
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/2004/2004.aplibrary
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/2005/ ->
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/2005/2005.aplibrary
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/Texturen/ ->
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/Texturen/Texturen.aplibrary
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/...
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/2004/2004.aplibrary
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/2005/2005.aplibrary
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/Texturen/Texturen.aplibrary ->
/Volumes/HD39.1/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/Texturen/Texturen Library.aplibrary
Linking folders to where i believe they are right placed in my systems.
Now aperture's settings don't have to be changed each time to switch between libraries. Not connecting the external hdd gives me grayedout
folders within aperture, for data stored on the external drive. Having a folder located on my inetrnal hdd and 'linked' to aperture:
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/local ->
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/working.local.aplibrary
i can work with aperture normally, even if the external drive is not available.
the grayedout folders/subfolders/projects are browsable, but all thumbnails are just gray rectangles with its 'version name' underneath. same with smart-albums. available pics have colored thumbnails, unavailable pics are gray, naturally.
And aperture's database? well, i am very happy with it, really. Compared to my pre-aperture structure all the above mentioned tweaking gave me:
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/Aperture.aplib/Library.apdb
This file is actually the sqlite3 database file. it's size is 111 MB now.
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/Local ->
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/Working.local.aplibrary
I can store pictures there into folders and projects when i am on the road, filling up my local harddisk. Inspecting the paket shows up how aperture differenciated my pre-aperture filestructure:
/Bibliothek/Bildarchiv/Working.local.aplibrary/2005-12-08, take a better name.approject/2005-12-08 @ 01/49/06 PM - 1.apimportgroup/DSC0168/dsc0168.nef
All nicely packed into a single unit from the finder, easily browsable from aperture, and searchable by sql queries. Every Master enclosed in its own folder box, hm. Every import of files seperated to one folder, which makes clearly apparent that we will import redundant(duplicate) files for ever.
Adding two/three levels to my previous filestructure, strange namings all inclusive. As i sort my files with aperture into projects, the files accordingly move around at the filesystem-level. I'll let them go. They are there if i need access to them in case of failure.
T H E G L I T C H E S
within my setup the most current sql database is stored at:
~me/Pictures/Aperture Library.aplibrary/Aperture.aplib/Library.apdb
importing the way i did results in a sqlite3-database file for each library i switched to before linking them together. Right after linking one of those aplibrary pakets as a new folder, aperture will rebuild the current database at startup, which can indepently be invoked with 'option command aperture' anytime the program is started.
Changes to the metadata of a picture are written to the current database aperture is running on, but can be transfered to any other database file
when rebuilding the library at startup (which can be a time-consuming thing!)
Even if the external hd is reconnected before startup, some thumbnails are not properly generated all the time. At the current state i don't have any glue what's the cause for this. All Versions are properly accessable anyway.
Once again,
DO THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK,
if you try some of the suggestions i've made. Better you know how to handle a terminal before you even think about what i told here. Don't bother me, if something does not work for you - it works for me.
I can do this because it's my data, i am the only one affected by failure and i still do have my data on my windows system as a backup, for now.
Do the same before you trash your treasures.
Why i did made this post? Aperture really lacks support for team-working now. I cannot see how aperture can be really employed to its potential for an environment with more than a single user?. The sqlite3 database is said to handle concurrent users, i read on its homepage. So i still hope, there will be a group-worked aperture someday.

my reports, just for the logs.
drwxr-xr-x 2 fo03c fo03c 68 Dec 19 20:15 ArchiveInfo
-rw-r--r-- 1 fo03c fo03c 362 Dec 19 20:17 DataModelVersion.plist
-rw-r--r-- 1 fo03c fo03c 173107200 Dec 20 00:26 Library.apdb
comparing the timestamps, the time needed to recreate 'my' library, is:
4h 11 min.
The sql database contains 972 projects with 57952 picture items, as the startup overlay tells me. not that bad, i think. depends on the situation, and how much zen you learned, if you can wait for the 'recreate'.
but i didn't stop to mature aperture!
i switched to one of my 'old' libraries (choosing from preferences panel) and set some new
a) ratings
b) keywords
c) deleted a master from that 'old' library.
after changing back to the 'linked' aperture database file (within my home-directory, as described previously), and restart aperture -
yes, it crashed! oops.
yet another try - crash. i realized, i deleted the first pic from the 'current view' aperture tries to load after relaunch. ?! =:-(
if the database is corrupted again, i would have to reinvest ~4 hours to recreate the database? but how about the preferences?
apple this is a bug! when i made the preferences file
~me/Library/Preferences/com.apple.Aperture.plist
UNAVAILABLE (delete or rename as you like), aperture starts with the import assistent, as at its first time.
Since then i can start aperture and navigate to the project i deleted the file from (very unpolitly). The corresponding thumbnail shows up with a new 'icon' to lower right corner of the thumbnail. It clearly means: this file is UNAVAILABLE.
YES =:-) i deleted it!
the rating and keywording on the 'old' database is gone -
thus making the precedence of the database against the sidecars obvious, doensn't it?
selecting the 'orphaned' thumbnail, now leaves aperture with the message 'loading', but it does not crash. Changes in ratings or keywording to the current library (the 'recreated' new one) on different files are persitent across restarts of aperture. btw, aperture restarts with the focus on the orphaned first thumbnail, now marked with the icon 'i am NOT available', but it does not crash anymore, when starting.
my conclusion:
someone in the forums pointed towards the difficulties maintaining a database of pictures and the separation of their storage, as users will delete or move files seperated from that database, breaking everything.
NO, aperture does widely tolerate such doing.
But why should we do so? =:-)f
For me: its fun, i will not complain about failure, when i do mature an application like this.

In a document library : group by view and manage metadata filter & Navigation problem

Hi all, I encounter a problem when configuring a document library using a group by view and in combination with the Managed Metadata filtering and
navigation :
- all the documents appear under my group by, even the ones that does not correspond
- In the other hand, the number in brackets shows the correct number of documents that should be shown
See screenshot below.
Did you already encounter that issue ? Is there a workaround ?

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to use a group by view and combine with the Managed Metadata filtering and navigation in a document library
to show the corresponding documents with the correct numbers in SharePoint 2013.
In my SharePoint 2013, I created a view which was group by two columns and combine with the Metadata Navigation Hierarchies and Key Filters some fields in a document
library. As a result, it showed only items matching the filter values.
So, I recommend that you can follow the steps to implement it in your environment.
Step1: Enable Metadata Navigation and Filtering:
Metadata Navigation and Filtering is a Site Feature that has to be activated for this to work.
And, the Metadata Navigation and Filtering feature is enabled by default on most sites.
If it is not enabled for your site, you can enable it on the Site Features pages for your site.
You must be a Site Owner or a Site Collection Administrator to enable Metadata Navigation and Filtering.
1. Go to “Site Settings” and click “Manage site features” under Site Actions.
2. Find “Metadata Navigation and Filtering” in the Features list and click “Activate”.
Step2:
Configure Metadata Navigation:
You must have a least the Manage Lists permission level to configure metadata navigation for a list or library.
1. Open the document library for which you want to configure metadata navigation.
2. Go to “Library Settings” of the document library and click “Metadata navigation settings” under “General Settings”.
3. In the Configure Navigation Hierarchies section, select the field or fields you want to display in the navigation hierarchy and then click “Add”.
4. By default, Folders are automatically displayed in the navigation hierarchy. If you do not want folders to display, select Folders, and then click Remove.
5. In the Configure Key Filters section, select the fields you want to add as Key Filters, and then click “Add”.
6. In the Configure automatic column indexing for this list, specify whether you want to automatically create indices on this list to increase the performance of the
queries that users will perform when they use the Navigation Hierarchy and Key Filter columns you've specified. It is recommended that you select the option “Automatically manage column indices on this list”.
7. Click “OK”.
Step3: Set a group by two columns by modifying view in the document library:
1. Go to the “LIBRARY” ribbon of the document library and click the “Modify view”.
2. Click the “Group By” and select up to two columns to determine what type of group and subgroup the items in the view will be displayed in.
3. Click “OK”.
Step4:
Go back to the document library, apply Navigation Hierarchies and Key Filters to do a test in your environment.
The result will like as below:
There is an article about how to apply Metadata Navigation Filtering in SharePoint 2013 for your reference.
http://blogs.interfacett.com/how-to-apply-metadata-navigation-filtering-in-sharepoint-2013
Best Regards,
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Organizing iPhoto Library Folders in iPhoto 6

Whenever I import photos off of my digital camera, iPhoto automatically puts them in folders by the date. You know, Library>Month>Day>Hour>Second>etc. This bugs me, because I like putting my photos under personalized folders, like "Mexico June06" or something within my Library folder. So now I get into the whole album thing and slideshow with music. I got all excited and then noticed that iPhoto copied every photo from my personalized folder into the standard Library>blah>blah folders again. So now I am stuck with two sets of photos. Is there any way that I can make an album without iPhoto copying all of my photos and putting them in those annoying folders? Please help! I would really appreciate it!

Crabbyhlovr:
If you're going to use iPhoto they you are going to need the Originals folder and the Modified folder. The Originals are the source files. Delete them and you've no longer have your image files. The Modified folder is needed so you can always revert back to the original, unedited source file in case you need to re-crop to print a different size or what ever. The subfolders in the year folders will have the same title as the roll in iPhoto that the represent. If you rename the roll in iPhoto those subfolders will be renamed also. It make it very easy to find a file. Actually all you need to do to find a file with the Finder is to Control-click on a thumbnail and select "Show file" in the contextual menu. You'll be immediately taken to the open folder that contains that file and it will be pre-selected.
If you want a hierarchical folder system you can do that in the Source pane by creating Folders and subfolder into which you can place albums. Those albums can represent entire rolls or specific selections of photos. To import a folder of photos into iPhoto and have it immediately be represented by an album just drag that folder into the Source pane and an album will be created (also a roll) with the same name as that folder. Saves a step or two.

MMS Hidden columns appearing in Document Library Settings / Column list

Hello all,
Before you read this please be aware that I have found a resolution (that might be helpful to others) but I am wondering if anyone else has experienced the same thing and the cause.
Our scenario is as follows:
We use a Content Type hub
Most Content Types include one or more Managed metadata columns
The MMS Notes (hidden) columns (e.g. mms_column_name_0) have appeared on the 'Document Library Settings page under 'Columns' for 2 document libraries only. They appear under the actual name of the column (e.g. mms_column_name).
They are NOT visible to the user however (i.e. they are not selectable to be used in a view)
Looking at SharePoint Manager the mms Notes column's are marked as being Hidden = false. Altering this to true has the desired effect.
But has anyone else experienced the same issue as I'm inquisitive as to the cause.
The only thing I can think of that caused this to happen was us using 'Metadata navigation settings' (which allows you to configure navigation hierarchies) for the first time on one of the 2 Doc Libs effected . However, on testing it on other document
libraries the unhiding of columns has not occurred.
Can anyone shed any why this may have occurred?
Jason

Hi jasonl27,
this behaviour:
This is by design. Two separate lists do not have any type of relationship established to distinguish that the
columns are the same. For example, take an arbitrary column called "Position" being created on two different custom lists. Because the column Position is a custom column created
in the list, it has no mapping to other lists. The "Position"
in one list could refer to a title of a person
in one list, or a physical location on a different list. SharePoint cannot tell if these two items are the same or completely different. As a result, a new column name is added when we move the item.
perhaps you may try to do these steps:
$site = Get-SPSite -Identity "http://......../"
$web = $site.RootWeb
$field=$web.Fields["column name"]
$field.Update($true)
$field.Hidden= "True"
$web.Dispose()
$site.Dispose()
Regards,
Aries
Microsoft Online Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Document Library Upload 'Choose Folder' programming Issues

Hello,
I have a document library with folders and subfolders and all folders have unique security inheritance applied. Administrator is able to upload to any folder using below dialog. I want everyone who does not have permission to the folders and subfolders to
upload file. So I decided to programmatically incorporate the ‘Choose Folder’ functionalities via SPSecurity.RunwithElivatedPrivillages(Delegate(){ “…” });
I incorporated fetching document library and populate hierarchies inside the security code so code run as system account. However when I call
LaunchPickerTreeDialog
it populates based on user permission and hence if user does not have permission to folder, it does not populate at
all.
How can I make sure to give this Upload file functionality to all users via dialog box with full permission so it generates all folders and subfolder of the document library when user select ‘Choose Folder’ option?
Please note that if I type the correct doc library folder url, it successfully uploads to any folders as my code is inside the elevated permission. It is not good approach to give textbox to end user to type as they might make a mistake, so I need to provide
a ‘Choose folder’ dialog functions but I want to run as elevated privileges as everyone who do not have permission also can upload the file.
I also tried using
http://howtosharepoint.blogspot.com/2010/02/sharepoint-2010-folder-selector-and.html but the following code can’t be resolved
if
(_hiddenSelectionField != null
&& !string.IsNullOrEmpty(_hiddenSelectionField.Value))
_listUrl.Text = GetObjectUrl(_hiddenSelectionField.Value);
_hiddenSelectionField.Value = string.Empty; }
How can I declare and make use of hiddenselectionField and
ListURL in my webpart?
Thanks

There's always a few challenges when trying to get around SharePoint's security model. Your options would be to try to extend the LaunchPickerTreeDialog if it's not sealed or to write a custom folder picker control. If you go the custom route, you could
even include it directly on that upload page to avoid the additional clicks.
Dimitri Ayrapetov (MCSE: SharePoint)

Successfully imported json bookmarks file into FF19, and library view shows folders correctly, but Sidebar view shows no folders and so loses my organization.

Longtime FF user. Still on 3.6.28 mostly, due to my need for my large collection of hierarchically organized bookmarks. I have 2000+.
Trying FF 19 today.
Successfully imported the json file from other system.
Via the Bookmarks menu, Show All reaches Library view and everything is there. Except for the fact that this FF design will not let me see the contents of more than one folder at one time. Which is why I've stayed with 3.6.28.
Now, a friend has shown me that I can see multiple folders AND the contents of multiple folders using Sidebar Bookmarks, just as I wish. Great! But after importing my bookmarks, all I see is a random list of bookmarks in the Sidebar view. There are no folders or subfolders so with this view I lose all the organizational structure I see in the Library.
Am I missing something? Is there a way (an addon) that would put everything in the Library Right Pane? instead of just one folder? That would be fine.
OR
Is there a way to preserve the organization of my bookmarks after importing them, in the Sidebar view? That would also be fine.
Thanks for any helpful answers. Otherwise, back to 3.6.28 I go.

In the Library view, everything functions as Mozilla would have it. Yes, individual bookmarks are not to be seen, except in the right side pane. And only from one folder at a time. Returning to the beginning, that was my complaint with Show All Bookmarks and why I've stuck with 3.6.28 coupled with Old Manage Bookmarks.
And that's why I asked if anyone is aware of an addon to make the contents of more than one folder visible in the right hand pane of the Library view in FF 4 and up. I've even tried Mike S's "hack" of OMB to see if I could make "Organize Bookmarks" return on FF19. No luck.
So Library View works as it "should". But that's insufficient for my needs.
You've indicated that Sidebar view SHOULD function as I wish. But so far, barring a fix, I don't see folders, subfolders nor individual bookmarks ''in the order'' that they started in, from PC1. I don't know why that failed. I'm happy to keep trying things, til the moon turns green.
Proceeding along -- sort Library? Yes, sorting works. But since the Library is functioning, unsorted is my preference. To make the Library View FULLY ADEQUATE though, I'd want to see bookmarks in different folders viewable at one time. What I need is the Sidebar view with all the folders showing, replicating the Library's View hierarchical structure.
HTML export and import? I'm sure I can import one into FF19. But I don't know how to export them from PC1 as my bookmarks are in .json format. When I try to do that, the dialog window confines me to selecting an HTML file, and so I can't export the .json file I have. I'm sure there's an easy answer, but its not intuitive.
Thx
P

Option To Insert "/" Between Hierarchical Keywords

"Treat "/" as a keyword separator" works for me when importing on Vista. I would like to see it added as an option for export. For example, I have keyword hierarchies of Places/National Parks/Yellowstone and Wildlife/Bears/Grizzly in both LR and my Vista Photo Gallery. Having LR automatically insert "/" when I export would automatically add them to their proper place in Photo Gallery. I would expect that "Places/National Parks/Yellowstone,Wildlife/Bears/Grizzly" would pop up in Keyword Tags and that when exported the images would be added to their proper hierarchies. Of course, this should be optional.

So to sum up, I should be spending time devising a sensible keyword structure for the entire library, and then per project/import, select which keywords I'm likely going to use for this particular set of photos
Yes, find keyword sets for typical workflows - the ones you will need for family shots, for vacation trips, for specific projects you are working on.
That seems to make sense, however what happens if I have forgotten to add an already existing keyword to my button sets and add it later (using the textfield above the button set selector), will that duplicate the keyword (ie adding it again to the toplevel), or will it select the keyword from deep down in the already existing hierarchy (the preferred approach!)?
if you add an already existing keyword in the searchfield, the search will show all already defined versions of this keyword. You may have used it more than once - for example "Flower"
There are predefined keywords that may be using the same term. Click the one you want to use.
Then the existing keyword will be used.
You can add new keywords to the button set any time from the "Edit" panel:

Safari hierarchical menus not working correctly

Hello all,
I'm having a problem with Safari's hierarchical menus not working correctly. They pop out in odd positions, and--worst of all--the big ones (for folders that contain lots of bookmarks) pop out right on top of the main bookmarks menu, making it all but impossible to navigate that main menu. I've tried all the usual tricks: log out/restart the system, restart Safari, reset Safari, boot in safe boot mode, repair permissions, yank Safari's bookmarks prefs file, even reinstall Safari, and nothing worked. I've also noticed the same behavior in Camino. My system hierarchical menus work fine, though, so I'm thinking I have a corrupt prefs file somewhere. I'm using Safari 4.04 with no extra plugins beyond what come with it on 10.5.8. Does anyone know what's going on and how to fix this?

AFAIK, the submenu will pop on either side, depending on available space and if there are further subfolders, allowing them to continue in the same direction.
Since the new account doesn't exhibit the issue, there are two ways to attack the problem. One is to log into your new account, make a list of the preference files (plists) located in /username/Library/Preferences/, including any in the ByHost subfolder, log back into the original account, move everything not on that list into a newly created folder on the Desktop, log out and back in, and see if the problem goes away. If so, you can copy the ones in the Desktop folder (one at time) back into /Preferences/, restart, and see if the problem returns. If so, you've identified the corrupt/conflicting one. Continue with all of them until isolating the bad ones. That'll save you the trouble of resetting preferences.
The second way is much more detailed and I'll not burden you with the steps unless the above doesn't fix the issue.

Changing to time-dependent hierarchie of 0CUSTOMER

Dear Experts,
I like to change 0CUSTOMER to "entire hierarchie is time-dependent" <b>without losing any existing hierarchy or data</b>. Is that somehow possible? I tried changing the Radio Button, but could not activate the InfoObject;
<i>"The Hierarchy Table /BI0/HCUSTOMER must be converted incompatibly with an activation of characteristic 0CUSTOMER (changes to the key in the table). Table /BI0/HCUSTOMER contains data. Parts of this data were lost in the conversion."</i>
I already checked the whole forum and the SAP help, but could not find a suitable note.
Can someone plase help?
Thank you very much in advance
Martina

Hello Amit,
Try reading the help documentation for such queries. e.g. Publishing Time-Dependent XML Documents - Knowledge Management - SAP Library
Regards,
Lorcan.

Hierarchical Library

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for